20080317Youngblood Direct.pdf

r."-'1"'''''''''''"
I Lf ri'i 5: 03
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
OF IDAHO POWER COMPAN FOR
AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT FIXED COST
ADJUSTMENT (FCA) RATES FOR
ELECTRIC SERVICE FROM JUNE 1, 2008
THROUGH MAY 31, 2009
CASE NO. IPC-E-08-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
DIRECT TESTIMONY
OF
MICHAEL J YOUNGBLOOD
1 Q.Please state your name and business address.
2 A.My name is Michael J. Youngblood and my
3 business address is 1221 West idaho Street, Boise, Idaho.
4 Q.By whom are you employed and in what
5 capacity?
6 A.I am employed by Idaho Power Company as a
7 Senior Pricing Analyst in the Revenue Requirement section of
8 the Pricing and Regulatory Services Department.
9 Q.Please describe your educational background
10 and work experience with Idaho Power Company.
11 A.In May of 1977, I received a Bachelor of
12 Science Degree in Mathematics and Computer Science from the
13 Uni versi ty of Idaho. From 1994 through 1996, I was a
14 graduate student in the MBA program at Colorado State
15 University.
16 I became employed by idaho Power Company in
17 1977. During my career, I have worked in several departments
18 and subsidiaries of the Company, including Systems
19 Development, Demand Planning, Strategic Planning and IDACORP
20 Solutions. Most relevant to this testimony, is my
21 experience within the Pricing and Regulatory Services
22 Department.
23 From 1981 to 1988, I worked as a Rate Analyst
24 in the Rates and Planning Department where I was responsible
25 for the preparation of electric rate design studies and bill
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 1
Idaho Power Company
1 frequency analyses. I was also responsible for the
2 validation and analysis of the load research data used for
3 cost of service allocations. From 1988 through 1991, I
4 worked in Demand Planning and was responsible for load
5 research and load forecasting functions including sample
6 design, implementation, data retrieval, analysis and
7 reporting. I was responsible for the preparation of the
8 five-year and twenty-year load forecasts used in revenue
9 proj ections and resource plans as well as the presentation
10 of these forecasts to the public and regulatory commissions.
11 In 2001, I returned to the Pricing and
12 Regulatory Services Department and have worked on special
13 projects related to deregulation, the Company's Integrated
14 Resource Plan, various generation resource Requests for
15 Proposals, the Company's Fixed Cost Adjustment mechanism and
16 other filings with this Commission and the Oregon Public
17 Utility Commission.
18 Q.Are you the same Michael J. Youngblood that
19 provided direct testimony in Case No. IPC-E-04-15, the
20 investigation of Financial Disincentives to Investment in
21 Energy Efficiency by Idaho Power Company?
22 A.Yes I am.
23 Q.What was the final result in Case No. IPC-E-
24 04-15?
25 A.On March 12, 2007, the Commission issued
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 2
Idaho Power Company
1 Order No. 30267 approving the December 1, 2006 Stipulation
2 and the proposed three-year pilot program Fixed Cost
3 Adjustment (FCA) mechanism for Residential Service (Schedule
4 1, Schedule 4, and Schedule 5) and Small General Service
5 (Schedule 7) customers. The FCA pilot program was
6 implemented on January 1, 2007 and will run through December
7 31, 2009, plus any carryover. Pursuant to the Stipulation,
8 the first rate adjustment is scheduled to occur June 1,
9 2008, coincident with the 2008-2009 Power Cost Adjustment
10 (PCA) .
11 Q.What is the purpose of your testimony?
12 A.My testimony will discuss four areas related
13 to the FCA pilot Program. First, I will briefly discuss the
14 FCA mechanism itself and how a fixed cost adjustment is
15 determined. Second, I will discuss the results of the first
16 year of implementation of the FCA pilot program. Third, I
17 will discuss the calculation of the fixed cost adjustment
18 rate the Company is proposing to go into effect on June 1,
19 2008. And finally, as a result of the recent change in the
20 Company's general rates, I will discuss the associated
21 changes to the Fixed Cost per Customer (FCC) and Fixed Cost
22 per Energy (FCE) rates that will be in effect until the next
23 change in base rates.
24 FIXED COST ADJUSTMNT MECHAISM
25 Q.What is the purpose of a Fixed Cost
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 3
idaho Power Company
1 Adjustment true-up mechanism?
2 A. The FCA is a true-up mechanism that
3 "decouples" , or separates, energy sales from revenue in
4 order to remove the financial disincentive that exists when
5 the Company invests in Demand Side Management (DSM)
6 resources. Under the FCA, rates are adjusted annually up or
7 down to recover or refund the difference between the fixed
8 costs authorized by the Commission in the Company's most
9 recent general rate case and the fixed costs that the
10 Company actually received through energy sales during the
11 previous year. Through the application of this true-up
12 mechanism, the Company is not financially harmed by
13 decreases in energy sales wi thin the residential and small
14 general service customer classes.
15 Q.Please describe the Fixed Cost Adjustment
16 mechanism.
17 A.For both the residential and small general
18 service classes, the FCA mechanism is the same. The formula
19 used to determine the FCA amount is:
20 FCA = (CUST X FCC) - (NORM X FCE)
21 Where:
22 FCA = Fixed Cost Adjustment;
23 CUST = Average numer of customers, by class;
24 FCC = Fixed Cost per Customer rate, by class;
25 NORM = Weather-normalized energy, by class;
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 4
idaho Power Company
1 FCE = Fixed Cost per Energy rate, by class.
2 Q.How is the FCA true-up amount determined?
3 A.The FCA true-up is the difference between the
4 Company's "allowed fixed cost recovery" (CUST X FCC) and the
5 "actual fixed cost recovery" (NORM X FCE). The "allowed
6 fixed cost recovery" is determined by multiplying the
7 average number of customers for the year times the fixed
8 cost per customer (FCC) rate established as a result of the
9 outcome in the Company's general rate case. The "actual
10 fixed cost recovery" is determined by multiplying the
11 weather-normalized energy sales for the year times the fixed
12 cost per energy (FCE) rate. The FCE rate is also
13 established in the Company's general rate case.
14 Q.Can the FCA true-up amount be negative, and
15 if so, what does this mean?
16 A.Yes. The FCA can be either posi ti ve or
17 negative. If the adjustment amount were posi ti ve that would
18 indicate the Company's allowed fixed cost recovery amount
19 was greater than the fixed costs actually recovered through
20 the energy rate for that class of customers. This would
21 stem from the fact that the growth rate in weather-
22 normalized energy was less than the growth rate in
23 customers, i.e., the use per customer had decreased. This
24 would indicate that the Company had under-collected its
25 fixed costs and therefore, additional dollars need to be
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 5
idaho Power Company
1 collected from the customer class in order to make the
2 Company financially whole. In a similar fashion, if the FCA
3 were negative, that would indicate that the Company's
4 allowed fixed cost recovery amount was less than the fixed
5 costs actually recovered through the class energy rate and
6 would result in a refund of the adjustment amount to that
7 customer class.
8 Q.Does the Stipulation provide the Commission
9 with discretion to cap the amounts collected under the FCA?
10 A.Yes. The Commission has the authority to
11 limit rate increases under the FCA to 3%.
12 FIRST YEA PILOT RESLTS
13 Q.Please summarize the results from the first
14 year the FCA mechanism was implemented for the Company's
15 residential and small general service customers in Idaho.
16 A.The results from the first year of the FCA
17 true-up mechanism reflect more 'than just the financial true-
18 ups. The results also reflect the Company's enhanced
19 efforts towards promoting energy efficiency in several
20 areas. Throughout 2007, and increasingly during the last
21 three quarters of the year following the issuance of Order
22 No. 30267, the Company actively pursued numerous, additional
23 opportunities to promote energy efficiency. These enhanced
24 efforts are fully described in the Company's 2007 Demand
25 Side Management Annual Report. A copy of the report is
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 6
Idaho Power Company
1 attached as Exhibit 1.
2 Q.In which areas did the Company enhance its
3 ongoing efforts to promote energy efficiency?
4 A.Some of the key areas where the Company
5 enhanced its effort towards promoting energy efficiency
6 include:
7 . A broader availability of efficiency and load
8 managemen t programs
9 . Building code improvement acti vi ty
10 . Pursuit of appliance code standards
11 . Expansion of DSM programs beyond peak
12 shaving / load shi f ting programs
13 . Expanded third-party verification programs.
14 Further explanation of the Company's enhanced
15 efforts to promote energy efficiency in these areas can be
16 found in Exhibit 1, the 2007 Demand Side Management Annual
17 Report, on pages 47 through 50.
18 Q.Were there conditions and provisions of the
19 Stipulation for the FCA which required action by the
20 Company?
21 A.Yes. Between January 2006 when the Company
22 filed an Application requesting authority to implement the
23 FCAmechanism, and March 2007 when Order No. 30267 was
24 issued approving the Stipulation to implement the FCA, the
25 Company had settled its general rate case, IPC-E-05-28. In
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 7
Idaho Power Company
1 the Stipulation for the FCA, the Company was directed to
2 reconcile any differences between Schedules 1 and 7 class
3 revenue requirements approved by the Commission in Case No.
4 IPC-E-05-28and the corresponding FCC and FCE rates. This
5 was to be completed prior to using the FCC and FCE rates in
6 determining the 2007 FCA.
7 Q.Did the Company reconcile any differences
8 between Schedules 1 and 7 class revenue requirements and the
9 corresponding FCC and FCE rates prior to using the FCC and
10 FCE rates in dètermining the 2007 FCA?
11 A.Yes. Exhibit 2 is a two-page exhibit
12 detailing the determination of total fixed costs recovered
13 through the energy charge. On page 2 of Exhibit 2, lines 46
14 and 47, column D shows the FCE rates for the residential and
15 small general service classes as $31.-62 per MW and $41.54
16 per MW, respectively (3.1621 cents/kWh for residential FCE
17 and 4.1539 cents/kWh for small general service FCE). The
18 total fixed cost recovery can be calculated for each class
19 by adding the fixed costs recovered from energy charges
20 (Exhibit 2, column L, line 29 for residential and line 30
21 for small general service) to the additional fixed cost
22 recovery (Exhibit 2, column B, line 46 for residential and
23 line 47 for small general service). The total fixed cost
24 recovery for the residential class is $142,415,626 (Exhibit
25 2, column L, line 29 plus column B, line 46). For the small
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 8
idaho Power Company
1 general service class, the total fixed cost recovery is
2 $9,080,705 (Exhibit 2, column L, line 30 plus colum B, line
3 47).
4 Exhibit 3 details the monthly "shaped" FCE
5 rates that were used for month-to-month reporting purposes
6 during 2007. In addition, Exhibit 3 shows the monthly FCC
7 rates that were in used for month-to-month reporting
8 purposes in 2007. For the residential class, the monthly
9 FCC rate was $32.98 per customer ($142,415,626 fixed cost
10 recovery divided by 359,802 average number of residential
11 customers / 12 months). For the small general service
12 class, the monthly FCC was $24.49 ($9,080,705 fixed cost
13 recovery divided by 30,899 average number of small general
14 service customers / 12 months) .
15 Q.Why are "shaped" FCE rates used for reporting
16 purposes?
17 A.The FCE rates are shaped in order to better
18 match cause and effect for accounting purposes ,so that the
19 Company can adhere to Generally Accepted Accounting
20 Principles (GAAP) and better estimate the financial impacts
21 of the FCA calculation at year-end. The ultimate FCA
22 adjustment is determined annually, but is booked to Company
23 accounts on a monthly basis. This is similar to PCA
24 accounting practices.
25 Q.Has the Company been periodically reporting
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 9
idaho Power Company
1 the balance of the FCA true-up account to the Commission?
2 A.Yes. As part of the Stipulation to Case No.
3 IPC-E-04-15, Order No. 30267, the Company agreed to record
4 the FCA deferral as a separate line item in the monthly PCA
5 report provided to the Commission. Exhibit 4 is a copy of
6 the PCA report for December 2007. On line 108 of page 2,
7 Exhibit 4, the Company reported an FCA combined balance of a
8 negative $2,145,403.
9 Q.What are the FCA true-up amounts for the
10 calendar year 2007 for both the residential and small
11 general service classes?
12 A.Exhibi t 5 is a two-page exhibit showing the
13 monthly calculations and accounting entries which are the
14 basis for the line item reporting of the FCA on the PCA
15 Report (Exhibit 4). Line 32 on page 2 of Exhibit 5 shows
16 the December 2007 combined balance for the FCA true-up as a
17 negative $2,145,402.86. This is the same number as shown on
18 the PCA Report (Exhibit 4, line 108) as the total FCA
19 balance through December 2007 (rounded to the nearest whole
20 dollar). Exhibit 5 shows the derivation of the negative
21 $2,145,402.86. This amount includes a negative
22 $3,252,971.80 (Exhibit 5, line 7, column N) as the
23 accumulated balance for the residential FCA (not including
24 interest) and a positive $1,159,776.77 (Exhibit 5, line 21,
25 column N) for the accumulated balance for the Small General
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 10
Idaho Power Company
1 Service FCA (not including interest) .
2 Q.Were any adjustments made to these amounts
3 once the Company's books were closed at year-end?
4 A.Yes. Once the Company's books were closed at
5 year-end, the average prorated customer count and annual
6 weather normalized energy sales were determined. Once these
7 were determined, the "allowed fixed cost recovery" (average
8 prorated customer èount X FCC) and the "actual fixed cost
9 recovered" (annual weather normalized energy sales X FCE)
10 could be calculated. The difference between this year-end
11 determination of the FCA balances and the sum of the twelve
12 monthly estimates of the FCA balances, required adjustments
13 to the FCA deferral account.
14 Q.What were the adjustments made to the
15 residential and small general service FCA balances?
16 A.In February 2008, the Company booked the
17 adjustments to the residential and small general service FCA
18 balances. For the residential class, an adjustment of a
19 negative $186,827.79 was made (Exhibit 5, line 6, column P)
20 resulting in a total accrual of negative $3,439,799.59, not
21 including interest. For the small general service class, a
22 negative $20,401.58 (Exhibit 5, line 20, column P)
23 adjustment was made resulting in a total deferral of
24 $1,139,375.19, not including interest.
25 Q.What is the total amount of the Fixed Cost
YOUNGBLOOD, DIll
Idaho Power Company
1 Adjustment, including interest, the Company is requesting to
2 implement in rates on June 1, 2008?
3 A.Exhibi t 5 shows the FCA balances and
4 adjustments, plus interest calculated through May 2008. The
5 FCA for the residential class shows a refund of
6 $3,587,591.70 reflected on Exhibit 5, Line 15, Column T.
7 For the small general service class, an additional
8 $1,187,033.97 reflected on Exhibit 5, line 29, Column T,
9 will need to be recovered as part of the FCA true-up
10 mechanism. The net of both customer classes is a refund of
11 $2,400,557.73 reflected on Exhibit 5, Line 32, Column T.
12 Q.What is the significance of these numers
13 with respect to the Company's recovery of its fixed costs?
14 A.Since the residential true-up is a negative
15 number, it means that the rate of growth in the number of
16 residential customers was less than the rate of growth in
17 the energy sales for that class, i. e., the average use per
18 customer increased. Therefore the residential class will
19 receive a refund of the additional fixed costs collected
20 during the year. For the small general service class,
21 however, the true-up amount is posi ti ve. That means that
22 the use per customer for this class has decreased and the
23 Company has under-collected its fixed costs. Therefore, the
24 FCA mechanism will recover additional revenue from the small
25 general service class.
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 12
Idaho Power Company
1 CALULATION OF 2008-2009 FCA RATES
2 Q.Please describe the calculation of the fixed
3 cost adjustment rate the Company is proposing to go into
4 effect on June 1, 2008.
5 A.The FCA rate the Company proposes to go into
6 effect on June 1, 2008 is determined by taking the FCA true-
7 up balances and dividing by the forecasted load for 2008, by
8 class.
9 Q.What has the Company determined for the
10 forecasted load for both the residential and small general
11 service classes?
12 A.The Company's forecast of normalized sales
13 for 2008 is 5,065,086,947 kWh and 190,586,226 kWh for the
14 residential and small general service classes , respectively.
15 Q.What is the FCA the Company proposes to place
16 into effect on June 1, 2008 for the residential class?
17 A.The residential FCA would be a refund to the
18 residential class of $3,587,591.70. This would mean a rate
19 reduction of 0.070830 cents per kWh ($3,587,591.70 X 100 /
20 5,065,086,947 kWh). This represents a 1.17% decrease in
21 residential rates.
22 Q.What is the total FCA determination for the
23 small general service class?
24 A.The small general service FCA requires an
25 additional recovery of fixed costs in the amount of
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 13
Idaho Power Company
1 $1,187,033.97. This would mean a rate increase for the
2 small general service class of 0.622833 cents per kWh
3 ($1,187,033.97 X 100/190,586,226 kWh). This represents a
4 7.30% increase in the small general service rates.
5 Q.Is this the FCA the Company is proposing for
6 the small general service class?
7 A.No. Since the fixed cost adjustment for the
8 small general service class is greater than 3%, the Company
9 has anticipated that the discretionary 3% cap on the FCA
10 increase may be implemented. Therefore, the Company is
11 proposing a rate increase of 3% for the small general
12 service class.
13 Q.What is the FCA the Company proposes to place
14 into effect on June 1, 2008 for the small general service
15 class?
l6 A.With a 3% cap implemented, the Company is
17 proposing a rate increase for the small general service
18 class of 0.255804 cents per kWh. This is determined by
19 multiplying the total revenue expected for the small general
20 service class under rates established in IPC-E-07-08 by 3%,
21 and then dividing by the forecast of 2008 normalized sales
22 for the class. The result is multiplied by 100 tò determine
23 cents per kWh ($16,250,923 X .03 / 190,586,226 kWh X 100).
24 This FCA increase would recover $487,528 of the additional
25 fixed costs to be recovered from the small general service
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 14
Idaho Power Company
1 class as a part of the 2007 FCA true-up.
2 Q.Wha t would happen to the remainder of the
3 uncollected fixed costs from the small general service
4 class?
5 A.The remaining balance of $699,506 would
6 remain in the deferral account and continue to accrue
7 interest until next year's FCA adjustment.
8 Q.The Stipulation specified that the FCA rate
9 component should be combined with the Conservation Program
10 Funding Charge for purposes of customer bill presentation.
11 How will the Company conform to the Stipulation's
12 specifications?
13 A.The Company is proposing the FCA rate
14 component be combined with the Conservation Program Funding
15 Charge into a single line item and that the line item be
16 renamed "Energy Efficiency Services" to more accurately
17 reflects the nature of the combined charges.
18 PROPOSED CHAGES TO THE FCC AN FCE
19 Q.Is the Company proposing to use the same FCC
20 and FCE for determining the 2008 Fixed Cost Adjustment?
21 A.No. The FCA attempts to recover or refund
22 the difference between the fixed costs authorized by the
23 Commission in the Company's most recent general rate case
24 and the fixed costs that the Company actually receives
25 through energy sales during the year. With Order No. 30508,
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 15
Idaho Power Company
1 Case No. IPC-E-07-08, the Company's rates have changed.
2 Therefore the amount of fixed costs being recovered through
3 the new rates is not the same as those in 2007. The FCC and
4 FCE need to be adjusted to reflect the new energy rates now
5 in effect.
6 Q.How does the Company propose to adjust the
7 FCC and FCE to reflect the energy rates now in effect?
8 A.Exhibi t 6 shows the Company's determination
9 of the FCC and FCE rates associated with the energy rates in
10 effect as a result of the Company's recent general rate
11 case, IPC-E-07-08. Because the Company's general rate case
12 was settled, the Company does not have a jurisdictional
13 separation study or cost of service study which directly
14 tracks the rates implemented by the Settlement. Therefore,
15 the Company proposes using the same ratio of fixed cost
16 recovery to total revenue recovered through the energy rate
17 as was in place for 2007 rates. On Exhibit 6, the top block
18 of numbers labeled IPC-E-05-28 Rates shows the ratio of
19 fixed costs to revenue recovered through the energy rate as
20 57.1% for the residential class (the FCE rate of $0.031621 /
21 Effective Rate of $0.055356). The next line down shows the
22 ratio for the small general service class as 62.4% (FCE rate
23 of $0.041539 / Effective Rate of $0.066583).
24 Q.How are these ratios used in determining the
25 FCC and FCE for 2008?
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 16
idaho Power Company
1 A.The bot tom block of numbers on Exhibi t 6,
2 labeled IPC-E-07 -08, show the calculations for the ECC and
3 FCE the Company proposes for 2008. The residential FCE rate
4 is determined by multiplying the Effective Rate by 57.1%.
5 This results in a 2008 residential class FCE rate of 3.3288
6 cents per kwh ($0.058275 X 57.1% X 100). The next line
7 shows the 2008 small general service FCE rate of 4.4223
8 cents per kWh (effective rate of $0.070885 X 62.4% X 100) .
9 Q.How are the FCC rates for residential and
10 small general service classes determined for the rates in
11 effect in 2008?
12 A.In order to compute the FCC rates for 2008,
13 the imputed fixed cost recovery dollar amount must first be
14 determined. To determine the FCC for the residential class,
15 multiply the residential FCE times the test year energy.
16 The result is a calculated fixed cost recovery dollar amount
17 of $165,246,810 ($0.033288 X 4,964,097,044 kWh). This
18 amount, divided by the numer of residential customers in
19 the test year, results in a residential FCC for 2008 of
20 $428.85 per customer. In the same manner, the FCC for the
21 small general service class is determined to be $294.79.
22 Q.When does the Company propose using the
23 revised FCC and FCE rates to track the monthly fixed cost
24 adjustments it records on its books?
25 A.The annual FCA deferral is tracked on a
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 17
idaho Power Company
1 monthly basis for the calendar year 2008. The Company
2 proposes using the revised residential and small general
3 service FCC and FCE rates beginning in January 2008.
4 Q.Are you providing a tariff schedule that
5 reflects the 2008 FCA to be effective June 1 and the 2008
6 FCE and FCC rates to be used beginning January 1?
7 A.Yes. I have included Exhibit 7 which
8 contains a new Fixed Cost Adjustment tariff sheet (Schedule
9 54) for the Commissions review and acceptance.
10 Q.Does this complete your testimony?
11 A.Yes.
YOUNGBLOOD, DI 18
Idaho Power Company
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTiliTIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-08-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
EXHIBIT NO.1
MICHAEL J. YOUNGBLOOD
ø
An IDACORP Company
Demand-Side Management
2007 Annual Report
E 0,1
08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 1 of 80
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables.. .................... .............. .......................... ..................... ... ....... ......... ................ ....................... iii
List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ iv
Glossary of Terms................................................ ........................................................................................v
Preface..........................................................................................................................................................1
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... ...........3
DSM Program Portfolio Structure .........................................................................................................4
Demand Response Programs ...........................................................................................................4
Energy Efficiency Programs. ............ ......... ..... ..... .... ........ ... ..................... ................... .... .................5
Market Transformation ....... ... ... ................. ..... ............ ... ........ .................. ........................................5
Other Programs and Activities.............................................,...........................................................5
Program Performance ............................................................................................................................5
Regulatory Initiatives............................................................................................ .................................7
DSM Expenditues and Funding.....................................................................................................7
Futue Plans............................................................................................................................. ........ 7
Customer Satisfaction ... ... ...... ......... .................. ... .... ... .................... .............. ..... ..............................8
DSM Anual Report Structue.......... ...................... ........................... ........... ........... ........................9
Residential Sector Overview..................................................................................................................... .1 0
Programs ..............................................................................................................................................10
Results..................................................................................................................................................10
Residential Sector Programs ................................................................................................................12
AlC Cool Credit.............................................................................................................................12
Energy House Calls...................................................................................................................... ..14
ENERGY STARiI Homes Northwest............................................................................................16
Oregon Residential Weatherization............................................................................................. ..18
Rebate Advantáge ......................................................................................................................... .19
ENERGY STARiILighting ............................................................................................................21
Weatherization Assistance for Qualified Customers...................... ................. ................ .......... ....23
Heating and Cooling Efficiency....... ............... ....... ............................. ........... ..... ... ..................... ...25
Commercial/Industral Sector Overview.................................................................................. ............... ..26
Programs........................................................................................................................ ..................... .26
Results..................................................................................................................................................27
Commercial/Industral Sector Programs..................................................... .........................................28 Exhibit NO.1IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, ¡PC
Page 2of80
Annual Report 2007 Pagei
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Building Efficiency.................... .... ........ .... ... ...................... ... ... ......... ..... .... .... ....... ...... ............. .....28
Easy Upgrades .... ..... ...................... ... ...... ......... ....... .......... ... ..... ........... ........... .... ........ ...................29
2008 Strategies.. .... ................. ........ .......................... ......... ........... ....... ................... ..... ...................30
Oregon Commercial Audits...........................................................................................................3 1
Custom Efficiency........ .............. ... .............. ......... ............ ................. ........... ......... ......... ...... ...... ...32
Irrigation Sector Overview................. ....... ....................... ....................... ...... ..................... .......... .... .... .....34
Programs .................................................................................,............................................................34
Results..................................................................................................................................................34
Irrigation Sector Programs................ ...... ........................... ..... ................... ................................. ........ .35
Irrigation Peak Rewards.................................................................................................................35
Irrgation Efficiency Rewards........................................................................................................37
Market Transformation ............. ....... ...... ....................... ....... .......................... ................................... ..... ....39
Northwest Energy Effciency Allance (NEEA)..................................................................................39
NEEA Activities ............................................................................................................................39
Industrial Effciency Allance (IEA) Activities in Idaho.........................................................39
Commercial Alliance Activities in Idaho ................. ..................... ....................... ....... ........ ....39
Distribution Efficiency Initiative .............................................................................................39
Residential NEEA Activities in Idaho.....................................................................................40
Other NEEA Activities in Idaho........................................................................................... ...40
NEEA Funding..... ..... .... .................. ..... ... .......................... ............................... .......... ....................40
Energy Effciency Advisory Group (EEAG) .............................................................................................42
EEAG Program Recommendations .....................................................................................................42
Residential Programs .................... .... ............ ........ ...... ... .... ........ ... ...... ......... ...... ... .........................42
Commercial and Industrial Programs ............... .......... ........ .......... ........... ......... ......... ........ ............43
Irrgation Programs .. ........................ ......... ............... .......... .......... ........... ........ .... ............... ............44
Local Energy Efficiency Funds (LEEF) ........................................................................................44
Other Programs and Activities...................................................................................................................45
Residential Energy Effciency Education Initiative........ .................... ............... ................ .......... ........45
Activities ...... ....................... ....... ................... ......... ........................... .......................... ...................45
Commercial Education Initiative..... .................... ..... ........................... ........................... ....... ..............45
Local Energy Efficiency Funds (LEEF) .................... ............. ..... .......... .... ................... ....... ................45
Regulatory Initiatives.................................................................................................................................47
Fixed-Cost Adjustment Pilot................................................................................................................47
Performance-Based DSM Incentive Pilot................................................... .........................................47 Exhibit NO.1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 30f80
Pageii Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Enhanced Commitment to Energy Efficiency and DSM..........................................................:..........4 7
Availability of Effciency and Load Management Programs ........................................................48
Building Code Improvement Activity ...........................................................................................48
Pursuit of Appliance Code Standards ...................... ......................................... ........... .............. ....49
Expansion ofDSM Programs Beyond Peak-Shaving! Load-Shifting Programs...........................49
Third-Part Verification.................................................................................................................49
IPC's Internal Energy Efficiency Commitment.............................................................................50
Appendices.................................................................................................................................................52
Appendix 1. Idaho Rider, Oregon Rider, BPA, and NEEA Funding Balances ..................................53
Appendix 2. 2007 DSM Expenses by Funding Source (Dollars) .......................................................54
Appendix 3. 2007 DSM Program Activity .........................................................................................55
Appendix 4. Historical DSM Expenses and Performance 2001-2007...............................................57
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. 2007 DSM Programs, Sectors, and Operational Type...............................................................6
Table 2. 2007 DSM Energy Impact .........................................................................................................6
Table 3. 2007 Sector Comparison............................................................................................................7
Table 4. 2007 DSM Expenses and Energy Impact.................................................................................. 7
Table 5. Residential Sector Direct Expenses and Ranked Energy Savings ............. ........................ ......11
Table 6. 2007 Residential Sector Demand Reduction (kW) .................................................................11
Table 7. Energy House Calls 2007 Activity and Energy Savings Summary........ ....... ....................... ...15
Table 8. Rebate Advantage 2007 Activity and Energy Savings Summary .. ................. ........................19
Table 9. ENERGY STARiI Lighting 2007 Program Summary .............................................................21
Table 10. Weatherization Assistance 2007 Year-End IPC Expenses ......................................................23
Table 11. Weatherization Assistance 2007 Year-End Energy Savings ...................................................24
Table 12. Commerciallndustral Sector Energy Savings (kWh) ............................................................27
Table 13. Commerciallndustrial Sector Demand Reduction (kW).........................................................27
Table 14. 2007 Irrgation Program Summary, Energy Savings (kWh) and Demand Reduction
(kW).........................................................................................................................................34
Table 15. 2007 IPC DSM Program Targets and Results.. ................... .............. ............... .......... .............51
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood,lPC
Page 4 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page iii
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. DSM Annual Expense History 2001-2007 ...............................................................................3
Figure 2. DSM Annual Energy Savings 2001-2007 .................................................................................4
Figure 3. 2007 Direct Program Expense ...................................................................................................8
Figure 4. Customer Perception ofIPC's Conservation Efforts.................................................................9
Figure 5. 2007 Commercial/Industrial Sector Direct Program Expense ..... .......... ............. ................... ..26
Figure 6. 2007 Custom Efficiency Measures Anual Energy Savings (kWh)........................................33
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 5 of 80
Page iv Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
aMW-A verage Megawatt
akW-Average Kilowatt
AlC-Air Conditioning
ASHRAE-American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers
BCA-Building Contractors Association
BEEP-Building Owners and Managers Association's Energy Efficiency Program
BETC-Business Energy Tax Credit
BLC-Basic Load Capacity
BOC-Boise Operations Center
BOMA-Building Owners and Managers Association
BP A-Bonneville Power Administration
BSU-Boise State University
CAC-Central Air Conditioning/Conditioners
CAP-Community Action Partnership
CAP AI-Community Action Partership Association of Idaho, Inc.
CCOA-Canyon County Organization on Aging and Community Services
CCNO-Community Connection of Northeast Oregon, Inc.
CFL-Compact Fluorescent Lighting
CHQ-Corporate Headquarters (Idaho Power Company)
CRC-Conservation Rate Credit
DOE-U.S. Departent of Energy
DSM-Demand-Side Management
DSR-Delivery Service Representatives
EEAG-Energy Efficiency Advisory Group
EI-Ada~EI-Ada Community Action Partership
EEBA-Energy and Environmental Building Association
EICAP-Eastem Idaho Community Action Partership
Energy Plan-Also known as Integrated Resource Plan
ET0-Energy Trust of Oregon
FCA-Fixed-Cost Adjustment
H&CE-Heating and Cooling Efficiency Program
HCSCS-Hamey County Senior and Community Services Center
HMCAA-Hamey-Malheur Community Action Agency
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 6of80
Annual Report 2007 Page v
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
HV AC-Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
HVR-Home Voltage Regulator
IEA-Industrial Effciency Alliance
IECC-Intemational Energy Conservation Code
IESBP-Idaho ENERGY STARiI Builders Partership
IPC-Idaho Power Company
IPUC-Idaho Public Utilities Commission
IRP-Integrated Resource Plan (or Energy Plan)
kvar-Kilovolt ampere reactive
kW-Kilowatt
kWh-Kilowatt-hour
LED-Light-Emitting Diode
LEED-Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
LEEF-Local Energy Effciency Funds
LDL-Lighting Design Lab
MCOA-Malheur Council on Aging
MW-Megawatt
MWh-Megawatt-hour
NEEM-Northwest Energy Effcient Manufactued Housing Program
NEEA-Nortwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
NWCC-Northwest Power and Conservation Council
OER-Office of Energy Resources (formerly the Idaho Energy Division)
ODOE-ûregon Departent of Energy
OPUC-Public Utility Commission of Oregon
PECI-Port1and Energy Conservation, Inc.
PLC-Power Line Carrer
PTCS-Performance Tested Comfort System
RFP-Request for Proposal
RTF-Regional Technical Forum
Rider-Idaho Energy Effciency Rider and Oregon Energy Efficiency Rider
SCCAP-South Central Community Action Partership
SEER-Seasonal Energy Effciency Ratio
SEICAA-Southeastem Idaho Community Action Agency
SWAT-Savings With A Twist Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 7 of 80
Page vi Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
USB-Utility Sounding Board
V-Volt
W AQC- Weatherization Assistance for Qualified Customers
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 8 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page vii
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 9 of 80
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
PREFACE
Idaho Power Company's (IPC) Demand-Side
Management (DSM) 2007 Anual Report
provides a review of the financial and
operational performance ofIPC's DSM
activities and initiatives for the 2007 calendar
year. These programs provide a wide range of
opportnities for all customer classes to balance
their energy needs with best practice energy
usage to minimize consumption.
During 2007, IPC continued to expand the
programs that began with the 2004 Integrated
Resource Plan (IRP), also known as the Energy
Plan. IPC's 2006 Energy Plan included the
addition of three new DSM programs and the
expansion of one program. In addition to the
DSM programs identified in the Energy Plan,
IPC has also continued to pursue other
customer-focused DSM initiatives, including
programs that preceded the 2004 Energy Plan,
educational opportities, and regional market
transformation efforts. Also in 2007, as par of
new regulatory initiatives, IPC committed to
enhance its efforts towards promoting energy
effciency.
IPC's DSM activities throughout 2007 focused
primarily on enhanced program participation
and energy savings in the curent programs, and
design and implementation of new programs.
IPC also continued to fuher integrate IPC field
and support personnel to better facilitate the
building of customer awareness and
participation in the programs.
This DSM Annual Report is prepared to report
on IPC's DSM activities and finances
thoughout 2007, to express IPC's future plans
for DSM activities, and to conform to the Idaho
Public Utilities Commission's (IPUC) Order
No. 29419 and the Public Utility Commission of
Oregon's (OPUC) Order No. 89-507.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 10 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 1
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 11 of 80
Page 2 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Idaho Power Company (IPC) considers energy
efficiency to be an important and necessary part
of a balanced approach to meeting the growing
demand for electricity. Consistent with this
view, energy efficiency is one of the
cornerstones supporting IPC's resource
acquisition strategy. Energy efficiency is
recognized by IPC and its customers as
providing economic, operational, and
environmental benefits. Therefore, the pursuit of
all cost-effective demand-side resources is a
primary objective for iPC.
In 2007, the energy savings from IPC's DSM
activities increased by 29% and the expenditures
on DSM-related activities increased by 36%,
compared to 2006. This increase in spending
included existing programs and the development
of new programs that wil result in savings in
the future. DSM activities throughout 2007 were
focused predominantly on increasing program
participation, customer education, and the
planning and implementation of the new
programs. IPC completed its third full year of
implementation of programs identified in the
2004 Energy Plan. It was also the second year of
program implementation of the DSM resources
identified in the 2006 Energy Plan.
Figures 1 and 2 show the historical growth in
expenditues and resource acquisition from
2001 to the present.
IPC's two main objectives for DSM programs
are to 1) acquire cost-effective resources in
order to more effciently meet the electrical
system's needs, and 2) provide IPC's customers
with programs and information to help them
manage their energy and demand use and lower
their bils.
IPC achieves these objectives through the
development and implementation of programs
with specific energy, economic, and customer
satisfaction objectives. When possible, IPC
implements identical programs in its Idaho and
Oregon service areas.
IPC relies on input from the Energy Effciency
Advisory Group (EEAG) to provide customer
and public interest review ofDSM programs. In
addition to the EEAG, IPC solicits fuher
customer input through stakeholder groups in
Figure 1. DSM Annual Expense History 2001-2007
$18.00
$16.00
$1400iìc
g $12.00i
¡ $10,00
l $8.00w
:¡ $8.00
¡g
$4.00
$2.00
$0.00
201 2002 2003
15.66
200 200 Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-Q4
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 12 of 80
2007205
Annual Report 2007 Page 3
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Figure 2. DSM Annual Energy Savings 2001-2007
100.0
90,00
:ê 80.00
~
'õ 70,00
10i:
~60,00
i.50.001ICDi:40,00'i!'ø
""30.00
ei1lc 20.00w
10.00
0.00
201
91.17
202 2003
the residential, irrigation, commercial, and
industrial customer sectors. IPC also has
enhanced relationships with trade allies, trade
organizations, and regional groups committed to
increasing the use of energy efficiency programs
and measures to reduce electricity load.
During 2007, IPC continued its contractual
participation in, and funding of, the Nortwest
Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA). NEEA's
efforts in the Northwest impact IPC's customers
by providing behind-the-scenes regional market
changes, as well as strctual support, to
transform IPC's local markets.
In March 2007, the Bonnevile Power
Administration's (BPA) Conservation Rate
Credit (CRC) program was suspended. IPC
continued to operate the programs formerly
funded with CRC funds, including Energy
House Calls and Rebate Advantage, utilizing
Energy Efficiency Rider (Rider) funding.
DSM Program Portolio
Structure
The programs within the DSM portfolio are
offered to each of the four major customer
sectors: residential, commercial, industral, and
200 200 200720
irrgation. In 2007, the commercial and
industrial energy effciency programs were
made available to customers in either sector,
expanding the availability of these programs.
Because of this change, the sector is now often
referred to as the commercial/industral sector.
Programs are categorized by the operational
method through which the savings are realized:
Demand Response, Energy Efficiency, Market
Transformation, and Other Programs and
Activities. A brief description of each of these
operational categories follows.
Demand Response Programs
Demand Response programs are designed to
reduce participant electrcity loads at specific
times of the day and year when electrcity is
normally in short supply and the cost to supply
electrcity is high. The goal of Demand
Response programs within IPC's DSM portfolio
is to reduce the system summer peak demand,
thus minimizing the need for acquiring higher
cost, supply side alternatives, such as gas
turbine generation or open market electricity
purchases. Demand Response is usually
achieved through the use ofload control devices
installed on customer equipment. The measure
of program performance is the number of
k'l (kW) f d d d d d' k Exhibit NO.11 owatts 0 re uce eman unng pea IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, fPC
Page 13 of 80
Page 4 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company
periods. IPC currently offers two Demand
Response programs: one offered to residential
customers and one offered to irrgation
customers.
Energy Efficiency Programs
Energy Efficiency programs focus on reducing
energy usage through identifying buildings,
equipment, or components where energy
effcient design, replacement, or repair can yield
significant energy savings. These programs are
applicable to all customer sectors. Typical
project measures range from entire building
construction to simple light bulb replacement.
Savings from these programs are measured in
terms of reduced kilowatt-hour (kWh) usage, or
megawatt-hour (MWh) usage for larger projects.
These programs usually supply energy benefits
throughout the year. IPC' s Energy Efficiency
offerings include programs in residential and
commercial new constrction, residential and
commercial retrofit applications, and irrgation
and industrial systems improvement or
replacement.
Market Transformation
Market Transformation is a method of achieving
energy savings through engaging and
influencing large national and regional
organizations. These organizations are in a
position to impact the design of energy usage in
products, services, and methods that affect
electrcal power consumption. IPC primarily
achieves Market Transformation savings
through its participation in NEEA.
Market transformation can also be accomplished
by appliance or building code modifications or
enforcement. In 2007, with IPC support, the
State of Idaho adopted the International Energy
Conservation Code (IECC) 2006 building codes
for both residential and commercial building.
Also in 2007, IPC conducted an appliance
standards study to analyze the energy
consumption impact if Idaho were to adopt the
appliance standards currently in effect in
Oregon.
Demand-Side Management
Other Programs and Activities
Other Programs and Activities represents a wide
range of small projects that are typically
research- and development-oriented. This
category includes the Local Energy Efficiency
Funds (LEEF), formerly called the Small
Projects and Education Fund, the Residential
Energy Efficiency Education Initiative, and the
Commercial Educational Initiative. These
programs enable IPC to offer support for
projects and educational opportnities not
normally covered under existing programs.
Table 1 provides a summary of the DSM
programs and their respective sectors, as well as
operational category and the state in which each
was available in 2007.
Program Performance
DSM programs at IPC continue to grow in
participation and energy impact in the form of
energy savings and demand reduction. In 2007,
participation in the A/CCool Credit program
increased by 155%. The Irrgation Peak
Rewards and AlC Cool Credit programs
combined resulted in estimated summer peak
reduction of 48 MW, which represented a 29%
increase over 2006 results. The four Energy
Effciency programs that were identified in the
2004 Energy Plan were the Industral Effciency
(Custom Efficien~y), Building Efficiency,
ENERGY STAR Homes Northwest, and
Irrgation Efficiency Rewards programs. These
programs resulted in total annual savings of
45,540 MWh in 2007, which was a 20%
increase over the 2006 energy savings of
37,814 MWh for these programs.
The Energy Efficiency programs that originated
as a result of the 2006 Energy Plan were the
Heating and Cooling Effciency,
ENERGY STARiI Lighting, and the Easy
Upgrades programs. These programs resulted in
annual savings of 12,393 MWh in 2007.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 14 of 80
Annual Report 2007 PageS
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Table 1, 2007 DSM Programs, Sectors, and Operational Type
Program
NC Cool Credit.. ............ ...................................
Building Effciency Program...............................
Commercial Education Initiative ........................
Custom Effciency",..."...."..,"',.......,""',......,....
Easy Upgrades..,."..."....."..,...,..,',.......".."......,
Energy House Calls...................... .....................
ENERGY STAR'i Homes Northwest .................
ENERGY STAR'i Lighting .................................
Heating and Cooling Effciency..........................
Irrigation Effciency Rewards............... ..............
Irrigation Peak Rewards.................. .......... ........
Local Energy Effciency Funds ..........................
NEEA......,.,..,....."......,....,.....,.......,',.................
Oregon Commercial Audits .................. ........ .....
Oregon Residential Weatherization...... .............
Rebate Advantage...............,",........,"",.......,....
Residential Energy Effciency Education
Initiative ...,',...,'... ....... ......,,',.. ......,'" ........,",.....
Weatherization Assistance for Qualified
Customers........,"",......"..................,...,....,.."..,
Sector Operational Type State
Residential Demand Response ID
Commercial/Industrial Energy Effciency ID/OR
Commercial Other Programs and Activities ID/OR
Commercial/Industrial Energy Effciency ID/OR
Commercial/Industrial Energy Effciency ID/OR
Residential Energy Efficiency ID/OR
Residential Energy Efficiency ID/OR
Residential Energy Effciency ID/OR
Residential Energy Effciency ID
Irrigation Energy Effciency ID/OR
Irrigation Demand Response ID/OR
All Other Programs and Activities ID
All Market Transformation ID/OR
Commercial Energy Efficiency OR
Residential Energy Effciency OR
Residential Energy Effciency ID/OR
Residential Other Programs and Activities ID/OR
Residential Energy Effciency ID/OR
An expansion of the program formerly known
as the Industrial Effciency program was also
identified in the 2006 Energy Plan and, as a
result, the program was expanded in 2007 and is
now called the Custom Effciency program.
In addition to the Energy Plan programs offered
durng 2007, IPC operated several other energy
efficiency programs targeting residential
customers: Weatherization Assistance for
Qualified Customers (W AQC), Energy House
Calls, Rebate Advantage, and Oregon
Residential Weatherization. These energy
efficiency programs added annual savings of
4,602 MWh in 2007.
Additional significant energy savings continue
to be realized through market transformation
partnership activities with NEEA. NEEA
estimated that 28,601 MWh were saved in IPC's
service area during 2007.
Table 2 shows the 2007 annual energy savings,
summer peak demand reduction, and average
megawatt (aMW) savings associated with each
of the DSM program categories. Unless
otherwise noted, all energy savings presented in
this report are measured or estimated at the
customer's meter, excluding line losses.
Table 2. 2007 DSM Energy Impact
MWh
Peak
MW
48
9
Demand Response ............... .....
Energy Efficiency.................. .....
Market Transformation ..............'
Other Programs and Activities....
Total 2007
62,535
28,601
9
91,145 57
Table 3 provides a comparson of the 2007
contribution of each sector in terms of weather
adjusted energy usage and its respective size in
number of customers.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 150f80
Page 6 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Table 3.2007 Sector Comparison
%of Average
Normalized Energy Number of
MWh Usage Customers
Residential....... .5,109,692 36%397,286
Commercial...... .3,897,540 28%61,640
Industrial,..,.....,..3,450,318 24%126
Irrigation ............1,693,785 12%16,665
Total 14,151,334 100%475,717
Please note that energy, demand, and expense
data have been rounded to the nearest whole
unit, which may result in minor rounding
differences.
Regulatory Initiatives
IPC has aligned itself with the IPUC and the
members of the environmental community to
work toward creating a financial and regulatory
environment supportive of utility DSM resource
acquisition. Resulting from this collaborative
effort are two financial mechanisms designed to:
1) remove the financial disincentives to utility
DSM resource acquisition; and 2) provide a
financial incentive to shareowners when DSM
programs perform above baseline goals. IPC is
optimistic that this effort wil lead to a sustained
environment supportive of its plans to pursue all
cost-effective DSM opportnities while
balancing its shareowner's financial objectives.
In response to these regulatory mechanisms,
IPC has committed to enhancing its efforts
toward promoting DSM and energy efficiency
in several key areas, including a broad
availability of effciency and load management
programs, building code improvement activity,
pursuit of appliance code standards, expansion
of DSM programs beyond peak shaving/load
shifting programs, and third-part verification.
DSM Expenditures
and Funding
Funding for DSM programs in 2007 came from
several sources. The Idaho Energy Efficiency
Rider and Oregon Energy Efficiency Rider
funds are collected directly from customers on
their monthly bils at a rate of 1.5% of base rate
revenues, with monthly caps on residential and
irrigation customer contrbutions. IPC also
received funds from the BP A, which until
March 2007 were provided through BPA's CRC
program. DSM-related expenses not fuded
through the Rider or BP A fuds, including costs
for administration and overhead, are included as
part ofIPC's ongoing operation and
maintenance costs. Total DSM expenses funded
from these sources were slightly under
$ i 6 million in 2007.
Table 4 provides a summar of the 2007
expenses and energy savings by each fuding
category.
Table 4. 2007 DSM Expenses and Energy Impact
Idaho Rider Funded .......
Oregon Rider Funded ....
SPA Funded...................
IPC Funded....................
Total 2007
Expenses
$13,487,460
$409,188
$200,686
$1,565,043
$15,662,378
MWhSavings
81,883
4,364
1,560
3,338
91,145
Figure 3 shows the relationships among the
2007 DSM program expenditures by operational
category. Direct program expenses include
customer incentives and other program-specific
costs. Administrative and overhead costs are
non-direct program expenses or costs not
directly attibutable to a specific program.
Future Plans
Many of IPC' s DSM programs are selected for
implementation through its biennial Energy
Plan. The Energy Plan is a public document that
details IPC's strategy for economically
maintaining the adequacy of its power system
into the future. The Energy Plan process
balances risk, environmental, economic, and
other considerations in developing a preferred
portfolio of future resources that meet the Exhibit No, 1
specific energy needs of IPC and its customers. IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood. IPC
Page 16 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 7
Demand-Side Management
The Energy Plan is normally updated every two
years to reflect changes in supply costs, demand
for electrcity, and other factors; however, the
next full Energy Plan is scheduled to be
completed in June of 2009. An update to the
2006 plan wil be complete in June of2008. IPC
DSM staff wil be part of the collaborative team
compiling both the 2006 Energy Plan Update
and the 2009 Energy Plan.
Figure 3. 2007 Direct Program Expense
6% 1%
ii Demand Response
. Energ Effcìency
ii Market Transforation
ii Other Programs and Activities
Total Direct Proram EXPfnses
Admìnistration and Overhad
$4,042,035
$9,829,557
$893,340
$131.85
$14,896,817
$765,561
$15,662,378
In 2008, IPC plans to continue to increase
participation and energy savings from existing
programs, continue to implement new energy
effciency programs, research possible new
demand response programs, complete a new
DSM potential study, and evaluate several
existing programs. IPC wil participate in the
development of the Northwest Power and
Conservation Council's (NWPCC) Sixth Power
Plan, continue and enhance consumer education
on energy efficiency, and complete various
research and development projects.
Customer Satisfaction
Customer satisfaction is a key consideration in
IPC's program design, operations, and
Idaho Power Company
management. IPC utilizes surveys, focus groups,
stakeholder input, and input from the EEAG and
IPC field personneL. This information and input
is used during the design and modification
phases of program development and throughout
each program's life.
The Easy Upgrade program provides an
ongoing, Web-based customer survey for its
participants. The results of these surveys
indicate a general satisfaction with this program
and helps guide marketing efforts.
In early 2007, the WAQC program began
receiving satisfaction surveys from participating
customers. The results of this surey showed
that customers thought this program helped
them save energy, money, and educated them on
energy savings ideas.
An important measure of customer satisfaction
is the retention rate of ongoing programs. The
Irrigation Peak Rewards program has consistent
participation in the number of customers and the
number of service points since the program's
inception three years ago in 2005. Durng 2007,
the AlC Cool Credit program experienced high
customer retention, indicated through the low
program atttion rate of less than 1 %, due to
factors other than customer relocation.
Results ofIPC's quarterly Customer
Satisfaction Survey have shown steady
improvement over recent years as the percent of
customers who have a positive perception of
IPC's energy conservation efforts has continued
to increase. Customers' positive perception of
IPC's conservation efforts increased from 39%
in early 2003 to 50% in late 2007, which is an
11 percentage point increase. This represents a
28% increase in positive customer perception.
IPC continues to expand its customer
satisfaction measurement activities to identify
actionable areas of improvement.
Figue 4 depicts biannual growth in the number
of customers who indicated IPC met or Exhibit No, 1IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 17 of 80
Page 8 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Figure 4. Customer Perception of IPC's Conservation Efforts
60%
50%47%
50%45Y47%46%45%43%
40%~44%
39%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Qtr 2 Qtr 4 Qtr 2 Qtr 4 Qtr 2 Qtr 4 Qtr 2 Qtr 4 Qtr 2 Qtr4
2003 2003 200 200 205 2005 2006 2006 2001 2001
exceeded their needs in regard to energy
conservation efforts encouraged by IPC.
including the Fixed-Cost Adjustment and
Performance-Based Incentive pilots.
Several programs, including AlC Cool Credit,
Energy House Calls, Rebate Advantage, and
Building Effciency, were developing customer
surveys late in 2007. These surveys will be
implemented in 2008. Surey results wil
measure customer satisfaction and provide
guidance when future modifications to programs
are considered.
DSM Annual Report Structure
The strctue of the first section of this report is
based on customer sectors (categorized by
residential, commercial/industrial, and
irrgation). The write-up for each sector contains
information about the specific programs unique
to that sector. Following the sector wrte-ups are
descriptions ofIPC's activities in Market
Transformation, Other Programs and Activities,
and IPC's recent Regulatory Initiatives,
Exhibit No. 1
IPG-E-08-04
M, Youngbloo. IPC
Page 18 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 9
Demand-Side Management
RESIDENTIAL SECTOR
OVERVIEW
Residential customers represent IPC's largest
customer segment with over 400,000 accounts
at the end of 2007, serving approximately
one milion people. Growth within this segment
slowed slightly in 2007 compared to recent
years. The number of residential customers in
2007 grew by approximately 2%, adding more
than 7,000 customers. The residential sector
represents approximately 36% of total system
energy sales.
Programs
Programs available to residential customers
include one demand response program, seven
energy efficiency programs, and an educational
initiative program. The demand response
offering is the A/C Cool Credit program, which
achieves peak demand reduction by cycling
customers' central air conditioners. The
residential energy efficiency programs include
lIEnergy House Calls, ENERGY STAR Homes
Northwest, Oregon Residential Weatherization,
Rebate Advantage, ENERGY STARII Lighting,
W AQC, and Heating and Cooling Efficiency.
New in 2007 was the Residential Energy
Effciency Education Initiative, which provided
educational outreach to IPC residential
customers. Additionally, new programs under
development in 2007 were the Heating and
Cooling Effciency program and the Appliance
program.
IPC conducted approximately 20 regional
events in parnership with local community
retailers to educate and influence consumer
purchasing decisions relating to ENERGY
STAR lI Lighting. IPC increased residential
program outreach efforts in 2007 through
parterships with Home Depot, Lowes,
Wal-Mart, and other retailers. These
parterships were developed to educate
customers across IPC' s service area about
Idaho Power Company
energy efficient lighting and increase the
adoption of energy efficient lighting by
residential customers.
Another addition in 2007 was the creation of the
ww.getpluggcdin.com Web site and related
radio and TV advertising. These marketing
channels were designed to educate customers
about various issues facing IPC, and
specifically, energy effciency and the role it
plays in planning and managing growth.
Results
In 2007, the residential sector was responsible
for a 10% increase in energy savings from 2006
with 11,293,798 kWh savings in 2006 and
12,440,682 kWh in 2007. The peak demand
savings from this sector increased by 74% from
6.5 MW in 2006 to 11.4 MW in 2007. Customer
participation in the demand response programs
increased by 155% for 2007, and compact
fluorescent light (CFL) bulb sales increased
by 23%.
Table 5 summarizes the residential sector's
expenses and energy savings for 2007. Table 6
shows the residential sector demand reduction.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 190f80
Page 10 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Table 5. Residential Sector Direct Expenses and Ranked Energy Savings
Residential Sector Programs
ENERGY STARtB Lighting.....................................
WAQC-ID,......"',........"...."..".....,......,",........,,..
Energy House Calls..............................................
ENERGY ST ARtB Homes Northwest......... ......... ,.
Rebate Advantage"...."..,",.,"",.. ......,...,.....,',....,'
WAQC-OR......."',......,,....,"",......,..,..,..,",.........
Oregon Weatherization...""...."..,' ....... ..,.....,"',..,'
Heating and Cooling Effciency............. ................
Appliance Program"...,...,",......,.."....,..," ......., .....
Total
2007 Direct
Expenses
$557,646
$1,292,930
$336,372
$475,044
$89,269
$30,694
$3,781
$488,211
$9,275
$3,283,222
Expenses
% of 2007
Expenses
14.5%
39.4%
10,2%
17.0%
2,7%
0,9%
0,1%
14,9%
0.3%
100.0%
Energy Savings
2007 Energy % of 2007
Savings Energy(kWh) Savings
7,207,439 57.8%
3,296,019 26.4%
699,899 5.6%
629,634 5.3%
554,018 4.4%
42,108 001.0%
9,971 001.0%
1,595 001,0%
° 001,0%
12,440,682 100.0%
Table 6. 2007 Residential Sector Demand
Reduction (kW)
Summer
akW PeakkW
10,762
80
76 606
823
NC Cool Credit............,...... ..........
Appliance Program",....,"',......,"',.
Energy House Calls.............. .........
ENERGY STARtB Homes
Northwest.....,"",.,......,"',...,...".,.,.
ENERGY STARtB Lighting .............
Heating and Cooling Efficiency.....
Oregon Residential
Weatherization", ........,",.. .....,.....,.
Rebate Advantage........................, 63
WAQC-ID .......,"',......."..,............ 376
WAQC-OR.................................. 5
Total 1,425 11,368
Exhibit NO.1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 20 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 11
Demand-Side Management
Residential Sector
Demand Response Program
AIC Cool Credit
Description
AlC Cool Credit is a voluntary program for
residential customers. Originally developed as a
pilot program in 2003 and 2004, the program
was selected in the 2004 Energy Plan for
implementation in 2005. The program, through
the use of communications hardware and
softare, enables IPC to cycle participants'
central air conditioners on and off via a direct
load-control device installed on the air
conditioning unit. Participants receive a
monthly, monetary incentive for participating in
the program durng the summer season. This
program enables IPC to directly reduce system
peaking requirements durng times when
summer system demand is high. In 2007, the
program was available in Ada County, Canyon
County, and the Emmett valley.
Cycling of air conditioning units is achieved
through the use of either individual radio-
controlled or power line carrer (PLC) switches
installed on customer air conditioning
equipment. These switches cycle customer air
conditioners using a schedule initiated on the
day before, or the day of, a cycling event. Under
Idaho Power Company
this program, IPC may cycle participants' air
conditioners for up to 40 hours each month for
the months of June, July, and August.
In 2007, marketing efforts were significantly
increased in both the quantity and frequency of
mailings. A number of improvements in
developing target lists, updating program
materials, and tracking campaigns were made
over the course of the year. Response rates
ranged from less than 1 % to over 6%,
depending on the time of year and the area.
Spring and early summer saw the highest
response rates. There were also higher response
rates in Eagle and North Boise.
An importnt activity in 2007 was building
relationships with the heating, ventilation, and
air conditioning (HVAC) community. IPC staff
attended the Idaho State HV AC Association
monthly meetings and several meetings with
individual HV AC companies. This has been
beneficial in creating an educated awareness of
the program and minimizing the amount of
unauthorized switch disconnects.
Two mitigation projects occurred prior to the
start of the cycling season. The first incident
that required mitigation involved an installer
whose work did not match what was reported.
A plan to correct the problem was put in place
when it was discovered. Quality checks were
completed on all service calls completed by the
installer. The vendor responsible increased
resources to prevent interference with normal
production plans. In total, 2,786 sites were
visited.
The second incident involved a radio signal
intended for a limited number of switches that
was accidentally received by all the switches,
causing some to become inactive. The basis of
the problem was determined, and a plan w~s put
into place to correct the issue and prevent it
from happening in the futue. Each switch
required a physical visit to reset and download
information. This involved servicing over
7,000 switches.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 21 of 80
Page 12 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Due to the above issues, many switches were
not operable for cycling at the start of June. In
both cases, the vendors mitigated the problems.
The unintended benefit of checking nearly all of
the radio-controlled switches was that
verification of these units was completed in a
comprehensive way in a very short period of
time.
Results
Participation
Program participants increased from 5,369 in
2006 to13,692 by the end of2007. This total
included 236 participating customers in the
Emmett valley using the PLC system.
Installations occurred year-round in 2007, a
result of the ongoing, direct-mail campaigns. As
expected, enrollments and installations were
lower during the non-summer months.
As enrollments declined due to the end of
summer and the start of cooler weather, an
alternative marketing effort was implemented.
A marketing door hanger was placed at
approximately ten (10) homes near each new
A/C Cool Credit installation, resulting in an
increase of 1.6% new sign-ups for the program.
Demand Impact
The estimated demand reduction in July 2007
was 10.8 MW, a substantial increase over
5.6 MW achieved in 2006. Cumulative savings
for customers enrolled by year-end are expected
to provide an estimated 15 MW. Although
cycling appears to shift some usage from
cycling hours to non-cycling hours, the net
effect on kWh usage is negligible. IPC initiated
19 load-control events between June 20 and
August 30, 2007. The majority of control events
were four hours in duration at a 50% cycling
rate. However, when the temperatue was
forecasted to be 100 degrees or more, IPC
cycled at a 33% rate to minimize customer
discomfort and reduce potential participant
attition.
2008 Strategies
The 2008 A/C Cool Credit target is 16,000 new
participants. Since the target for 2007 was
approximately 12,000 new participants and
there were approximately 8,300 new
participants last year, this results in the need to
carr over the shortage of approximately 5,000
participants into the 2008 sign-up target.
IPC wil continue to manage and monitor the
performance of the installation contractors to
ensure that customer satisfaction with the
program remains high as the number of
installations increases. As IPC increases its
marketing efforts in 2008, additional trained
installers wil be used to support the increased
participation targets.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 22 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 13
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Energy House Calls
Description
Originally launched as a pilot in 2002, the
Energy House Calls program provides duct
sealing and additional effciency measures to
IPC customers living in manufactured homes.
Due to the suspension of BP A funding in 2007,
this program was fuded by the BP A the first
half of 2007 and by Rider fuds the remainder
of the year.
Funds cover the participants' costs and include
the following services and products: duct testing
and sealing according to Performance Tested
Comfort System (PTCS) specifications endorsed
by the BP A, installation of five CFL bulbs,
provision of two furnace filters along with
replacement instrctions, water heater
temperature test for proper setting, and
distribution of energy efficiency educational
materials for manufactured home occupants.
Program management is under contract with
Ecos Consulting, a company with experience in
managing and supplying duct-sealing service
programs. This company coordinates providers
performing local weatherization and energy
efficiency services. Quality assurance is
conducted by third-part audits.
Results
Significant energy savings were realized durng
2007, the fifth full year of operation for this
program. The number of CFL bulbs installed in
each home increased from three to five,
generating even greater energy savings.
Participation
Participation in this program exceeded
projections for 2007. IPC continued to focus on
recruiting rual customers and those living in
colder climates. This focus represented a shift
from the initial program target sector of
customers concentrated in communities of
manufactured homes. The shift in focus to
decentralized, rural manufactured housing units
required increased marketing effort and travel
time per housing unit.
In the past, new participants were recruited via
IPC bil stuffers, Customer Connection
newsletters, newspaper advertisements, and
field contractors. In 2007, IPC utilized a direct-
mail program targeted to customers on IPC's
customer information system whose house-tye
data indicated a mobile or manufactued home.
An analysis was conducted to fuher segment
this population into potential electrically-heated
homes based on energy use during winter
months. Response rates to this campaign have
been significant, far exceeding prior marketing
efforts.
Energy Impact
The annual energy savings increased by 13%
over the previous year, from 333,494 kWh in
2006 to 699,899 kWh in 2007. The primary
source of savings from the program came from
increasing the customers' efficiency of their
heating systems through improving air delivery
from furnaces- through the duct systems.
Improved delivery through duct systems also Exhibit NO.1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, ¡PC
Page 23 of 80
Page 14 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
provided energy savings associated with cooled
air where applicable.
The program's furnace filter and water
temperatue evaluation services educate the
occupants on maintaining energy efficient
practices in the future. Energy impact of these
measures is not quantified or included in the
total energy impact of the program.
Table 7 summarizes 2007 program service
activity for Idaho and Oregon customers.
Table 7. Energy House Calls 2007 Activity and
Energy Savings Summary
Idaho Oregon Total
Activity
Test Only........................72 10 82
Test and Seal.................643 24 667
Total Duct Measures 715 34 749
CFL Bulbs.......................3,515 175 3,690
Furnace Filters...............,1,252 63 1,315
Total Other Measures 4,767 238 5,005
Water Temperature
(Average).",.".................128 127 128
Energy Savings kWh.......... 674,399 25,500 699,899
2008 Strategies
In mid-2007, IPC assessed the market satuation
level of this program to determine whether or
not to continue Energy House Calls into 2008.
IPC identified a significant number of qualified
homes in the service area that can benefit from
this program. IPC plans to continue the program
for the full year in 2008 and focus greater
efforts on urban areas.
Another change for 2008 is an improvement in
how information is left with customers receiving
an Energy House Call. Instead of numerous
loose papers, they wil now receive a packet of
materiaL. The leave-behind information educates
customers on services performed and ways they
can conserve energy.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 24 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 15
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
ENERGY STAR(I Homes
Northwest
Description
The ENERGY STARiI Homes Northwest
program is a regionally coordinated initiative
supported by a partership of IPC, NEEA, and
the State of Idaho Office of Energy Resources
(OER) to improve energy effcient construction
practices for single-family homes.
Selected for implementation in the 2004 Energy
Plan, the program's goal is to encourage the
purchase of homes that are 20% more energy
efficient than homes built to standard Idaho
residential code. This program specifically
targets the reduction of peak summer demand.
This is accomplished by increasing the
efficiency of residential building envelope
construction practices, air conditioning
equipment, and air delivery.
In 2007, the program offered a $750 incentive
per qualifying home to participating builders
and a $1,000 incentive for Parade of Homes
units. Program activities included program
management services, coordination of local
parterships between IPC, builders, and real
estate service providers, education and training
activities for residential new constrction
industry partners, and consumer marketing
communications conveying the benefits of
ENERGY STARiI Homes.
Results
In 2007, the number of active ENERGY STARiI
builders increased from 119 to 132. However, as
a result of the housing downturn in the Treasure
Valley, the number of certified ENERGY
STARiI Homes in 2007 was 303, down from
439 homes in 2006.
IPC was instrumental in the formation of the
Idaho ENERGY STARiI Builders Partership
(IESBP), comprised of builders committed to
building exclusively 100% ENERGY STARiI
homes. In 2007, IPC co-sponsored a cooperative
marketing campaign with IESBP and Northwest
ENERGY STARiI. This campaign consisted of
print advertising, radio, and a 100% ENERGY
STARiI tour of homes.
Participation
While builder participation increased, the
number of certified homes fell short of the level
needed to meet the 2004 Energy PIau energy
target of 1,414,166 kWh or 681 homes for 2007.
Nearly 90% of the ENERGY STARiI Homes
completed were built in the Treasure Valley.
The program's estimated market share in 2007
was approximately 5% of the total single-family
housing starts in IPC's service area, which is a
slight increase over 2006.
Energy Impact
Anual energy savings in 2007 were
629,634 kWh as compared to 912,242 kWh
savings in 2006. The demand reduction in 2007
was 606 kW, and in 2006 it was 878 kW. This
decrease in both energy and demand savings can
be contributed to the downtu in the housing
market.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, ¡PC
Page 25 of 80
Page 16 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
2008 Strategies
In 2008, the incentive for builders wil change.
The 2006 International Energy Conservation
Code (IECC), which the State ofIdaho has
adopted as its standard building code, took
effect Januar 1,2008. This new code meets
ENERGY STARiI Homes Northwest program
standards in several key areas, which decreases
the incremental energy savings of each
ENERGY STARiI Home. As a direct result of
the upgrade in Idaho code and the resulting
reduction of energy savings, IPC has reduced
the incentive to $400 in 2008, down from the
$750 incentive previously offered. Incentives
for Parade of Homes units remain unchanged.
Based on current market conditions, IPC's
target for 2008 is to complete 380 certified
ENERGY STARiI Northwest Homes. In order
to achieve this target IPC plans to increase
awareness of the program, especially outside the
Treasure Valley. IPC wil continue to provide
realtor trainings, support Parade of Homes
events, support Building Contractors
Association (BCA) and realtor associations,
improve distribution of marketing materials, and
continue to support the IESBP group and their
activities.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 26 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 17
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Oregon Residential
Weatherization
Description
IPC offers free energy audits for electrcally
heated homes of customers within the Oregon
service area. Upon request, an IPC
representative visits the home to analyze it for
energy effciency. An estimate of costs and
savings for specific measures is given to the
customer. IPC offers financial assistance for a
portion of the costs for weatherization measures,
either as a cash incentive or with a 6.5% interest
loan.
Results
Participation
In 2007, a total of35 Oregon customers
responded to an informational brochure about
energy audits and home weatherization
financing in 2007. Each of the 35 customers
retued a card from the brochure indicating
they were interested in a home energy audit,
weatherization loan, or cash payment.
Twenty-two audits and responses to customer
inquiries to the program were completed.
Five customer responses were directed to
Cascade Natural Gas, and eight follow-up calls
to customers had no response.
Energy Impact
One of the 2007 audit participants chose to
implement energy-saving measures during the
year. This customer requested a loan for $ 1,808
to pay for ceiling and floor insulation used in
the home. Annual energy savings from this
program equaled 9,971 kWh.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 27 of 80
Page 18 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Rebate Advantage
Description
The Rebate Advantage program encourages
manufactured home buyers to purchase energy
efficient Super Good CentsiI and later ENERGY
STARiI manufactued homes. Effective
October 1, 2007, IPC began providing
incentives only on ENERGY STARiI-certified
manufactued homes.
Rebate Advantage promotes and educates
buyers and retailers of manufactued homes
about the benefits of owning energy efficient
models, and offers financial incentives.
Customers who purchase an ENERGY STARiI
home and site it in IPC' s service area are
eligible for a $500 incentive. In addition,
salespersons receive a $ 1 00 incentive for each
qualified home sold.
Quality control and energy effciency
specifications for qualified homes are
established by the Northwest Energy Efficient
Manufactured Housing (NEEM) program.
NEEM is a consortium of manufacturers and
state energy offices in the Northwest. In
addition to specifications and quality control,
Demand-Side Management
NEEM tracks the production and on-site
performance of ENERGY STARiI homes.
The license to use the Super Good CentsiI
designation in the Pacific Northwest was
discontinued as of September 30, 2006. Initially,
BP A fuding guidelines directed that, effective
October 1, 2006, new homes must be
manufactured under ENERGY STARiI
standards. Subsequent to this decision, BP A and
IPC decided to also accept the following homes
for credit until September 30,2007:
manufactured homes certified by NEEM as
Super Good CentsiI, and manufactured homes
sold as Super Good CentsiI homes prior to
October 1, 2006 that subsequently receive the
NEEM -certified designation.
Results
Participation
In 2007, there were 123 homes sold under this
program, compared to 102 homes in 2006. The
geographic reach of this program, as seen in
Table 8, shows 19% of the total homes
participating were in IPC's Oregon service area.
Approximately one-third of all manufactured
home dealers with sales in IPC' s service area
are participating in the program.
Table 8. Rebate Advantage 2007 Activity and
Energy Savings Summary
Idaho Oregon Total
Activity
Homes........................99 24 123
Towns with 48 9 57
Homes Sited...............
Counties with 21 3 24
Homes Sited...............
Salespeople(1)......,......30 13 NfA
Dealers(1) ....................19 9 NfA
Manufacturers(1) .........12 7 NfA
Energy Savings kWh ......465,882 88,196 554,018
(1) Some sales groups sell in both Idaho and Oregon,
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 28 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 19
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Energy Impact
The annual energy savings increased by 66%
over the previous year, from 333,494 kWh in
2006 to 554,018 kWh in 2007. Savings from
this program are largely due to improvements in
the shell of the home, resulting in more effcient
use of heating and cooling resources.
Manufacturers have some flexibility in how they
achieve a more effcient shell; however, a
common attrbute of all homes in the program is
a sealed-duct delivery system.
2008 Strategies
The 2008 target for this program is 150 certified
homes. To accomplish this target, IPC wil
increase outreach to manufactured home
dealers. A new brochure is being developed to
assist manufactured home dealers in promoting
ENERGY STARiI manufactured homes and
IPC's Rebate Advantage program to their
customers.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 29 of 80
Page 20 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
ENERGY STAR(ß'tighting
Description
The ENERGY STARiI Lighting program is
designed to achieve residential energy savings
through the replacement of less efficient lighting
with more effcient technology. The average
older home has 38 light bulbs. New homes have
an average of 77 light bulbs. Changing these
bulbs represents a low-cost, easy way for all
customers to achieve energy savings.
In 2007, the majority of energy savings were
achieved through IPC's participation in three
regional Change A Light promotions sponsored
by the BP A. Additional energy savings were
achieved from carrover from the 2006 Savings
With A Twist (SW A T) promotion and limited
direct-install opportnities. Table 9 describes
the energy savings and the number of CFL bulbs
contributed to each segment of the program.
Table 9. ENERGY STAR(ß Lighting 2007 Program
Summary
Current Programs
Savings With A Twist(1) ..............
Change A Light Spring ...............
Change A Light Fall Spiral.........
Change A Light Fall Specialty....
Light Bulb Direct-Install ..............
Total
kWh Energy # of CFL
Savings Bulbs
186,468
3,263,141
3,420,154
258,431
79,245
7,207,439
5,685
99,486
104,273
7,879
2,416
219,739
(1) 2006 carryover
Results
Energy Impact
ENERGY STARiI Lighting program activities
in Idaho and Oregon resulted in the installation
of219,739 CFLs for a savings of 7,207 MWh as
compared to 6,302 MWh in 2006. In 2007,
Idaho's portion included the installation of
213,652 CFLs for a savings of 7,007 MWh,
while Oregon's portion consisted of the
installation of 6,087 CFLs and a savings of
200MWh.
BP A has calculated the energy impact of a CFL
at 32.8 kWhlbulb for its CRC program. This is a
regional average based on the wattage
difference between the incandescent and CFL
bulb, adjusted for heating impact, market
satuation rates, and hours of operation.
Although the BP A-CRC program was
suspended mid-year, the Oregon portion ofthe
spring Change a Light program was financed
with CRC funds.
Customer Satisfaction
In 2007, IPC developed a strategy to address
customer concerns recognizing the role of state
and federal health and environmental
professionals in regard to risks posed by
mercury in CFLs. IPC informs customers of the
presence of mercur in bulbs and directs them to
the primary sources of environmental and health
information for specific questions related to Exhibit No, 1d. l' k d IPC-E-08-04isposa , ns , an management. M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 30 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 21
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Cost continues to be a market barrier with
off-promotion CFLs priced at $2 to over $6 in
the marketplace.
2008 Strategies
IPC wil continue to promote ENERGY ST ARiI
Lighting in 2008 through participation in
regional lighting promotions and customer
education, while exploring new projects to
promote energy efficient lighting.
IPC will provide customer education through
in-store events, targeting education efforts on
new bulb applications and emerging advances in
ENERGY STARiI lighting, including both CFL
and light-emitting diode (LED) technologies.
Additionally, IPC wil explore new programs
for ENERGY STARiI fixtures and ceiling fans,
and a light bulb program for smaller, rural
retailers.
Exhibit NO.1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 31 of 80
Page 22 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Weatherization Assistance
for Qualified Customers
Description
The W AQC program has been operating since
1989. The program provides funding for the
installation of cost-effective weatherization
measures in qualified owner-occupied and rental
homes that are electrcally heated.
Enhancements enable low-income families to
maintain a comfortable home environment,
while saving energy and money otherwise spent
on heating, cooling, and lighting.
W AQC is modeled after the u.s. Departent of
Energy (DOE) Weatherization Program. The
DOE program is managed through Health and
Human Services offices in Idaho and by the
Oregon Housing and Community Services in
Oregon.
IPC serves as the administrator of W AQC, in
conjunction with Community Action
Partnership (CAP) agencies in the IPC service
area. Federal funds are allocated to the Idaho
Departent of Health and Welfare and the
Oregon Housing and Community Services, then
to CAP agencies based upon U.S. Census data
Demand-Side Management
of qualifying household income within each
CAP agency's geographic area. The CAP
agencies oversee local weatherization crews and
contractors providing implementations that
improve energy effciency of the homes.
Table 10 provides a summary ofWAQC IPC
2007 expenses.
Table 10. Weatherization Assistance 2007
Year-End IPC Expenses
2007
Projects Expenses
IPC Payments
CAP Agencies(1)
CCOA.............,""',.........
EI-Ada"".......,..,.............
EICAP,..,....,..,...,.............
SCCAP...........................
SEICAA..........................
ID Total
MCOA-OR...................
HCSCS-OR.................
CCNO-OR...................
OR Total
Total CAP Agencies
Non-Profit Projects
Non-Profits-ID ........, .., ...
Non-Profis-DR .............
Total Non.Profi
TotallPC Payments
IPC Administration(2)
Total IPC Program Expense
(1) See Glossary for Community Action Partnership (CAP)
definitions.
(2) Includes BPA funding of $28,035 for 2007,
Results
120 $355,071
159 $473,288
6 $12,788
65 $171,830
47 $111,604
397 $1,124,581
9 $23,019
0 $0
2 $5,869
11 $28,887
408 $1,153,468
0 $75,760
0 $0
0 $75,760
408 $1,229,228
$94,395
$1,323,624
Participatiori
During 2007, Idaho CAP agencies weatherized
391 electrically heated homes and six buildings
housing nonprofit agencies providing assistance
to special-needs customers. Oregon CAP Exhibit No, 1
agencies weatherized 11 homes. In 2007 thf' IPC-E-08-04, '1i. Youngblood, IPC
Page 32 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 23
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
W AQC program completed a total of
408 weatherization jobs.
Energy Impact
The annual energy savings increased by 13%
over the prior year, to 3,338,126 kWh in 2007 as
compared to 2,958,024 kWh savings in 2006.
Table 11 provides W AQC 2007 energy savings.
Table 11. Weatherization Assistance 2007
Year-End Energy Savings
kWh Savings for 2007
CAP Agencies
CCOA""..,."........,.,.,..".,
EI-Ada ...........................
EICAP............................
SCCAP.......,',......,.......,"
SEICM...,.........,......"..,'
10 Total
MCOA-OR...................
HCSCS-GR....,',..,.,',....
CCNO-OR...................
OR Total
Total CAP Agencies
Non-Profit Projects
Non-Profis-ID ...............
Non-Profis-OR ............,
Total Non-Profi
Total kWh Savings
1,304,375
1,181,873
20,525
286,709
203,916
2,997,399
25,921
o
16,187
42,108
3,039,507
298,619
o
298,619
3,338,126
Customer Satisfaction
In 2007, the WAQC program received
satisfaction surveys from customers whose
homes had been weatherized through the
program. Customers were asked how much they
thought the weatherization had improved the
comfort of their home. Seventy-three percent of
the respondents replied that they thought the
improvements helped. Fifty-one percent of the
respondents also thought that weatherization
would reduce futue bils, and 93% reported
having tred energy-saving ideas in their home.
2008 Strategies
IPC staff will continue to work with Idaho
Departent of Health and Welfare, Oregon
Housing and Community Services, CAP AI, and
individual CAP agency management and staff to
coordinate services and monitor the program to
best serve special-needs customers.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 33 of 80
Page 24 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Heating and Cooling
Efficiency
Description
The Heating and Cooling Effciency (H&CE)
program began in September 2007. The
objectives of this program are to acquire kWh
savings and reduce summer peak demand
through the implementation of energy-saving
HV AC measures in the residential sector. Cash
incentives are provided to residential customers
and HV AC contractors who install eligible
central air conditioners (CAC), heat pumps, and
evaporative coolers. Incentives are awarded for
qualifying heat pump tue-ups and CAC
tue-ups meeting IPC' s program specifications.
All work must be performed by a participating
HVAC company.
The H&CE program is available to IPC
customers in Idaho and requires contractors to
become "participating" companies who must
sign an agreement with IPC. The partcipating
companies must ensure their service technicians
and installers attend required training on the
proper installation of air conditioners and heat
pumps. These companies must purchase and use
TrueFlow™ Meters to measure air flow, and
adhere to program specifications.
During fall 2007, IPC sponsored classes on the
proper sizing of equipment and over
200 technicians attended these classes.
Results
F our customer incentives were processed in
2007, resulting in a total energy savings of
1,595 kWh.
2008 Strategies
In 2008, IPC plans to increase awareness and
participation in the program by implementing a
comprehensive marketing/advertising strategy,
and by increasing the number of contractors
properly sizing and installing heating and
cooling equipment.
Exhibit NO.1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 34 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 25
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR OVERVIEW
The commercial/industrial sector consists of
approximately 62,000 customers, with
2,586 new customers added during 2007 for an
increase of about 4.4%. Energy usage of
customers within this sector varies from a few
kWh each month to several hundred thousand
kWh per month. This sector represents
approximately 52% ofIPC's total actual system
energy sales. The industral customers in this
sector are IPC's largest individual energy
consumers. This group consists of
approximately 300 customers and accounts for
about 29% ofIPC's system energy sales.
Programs
Three programs targeting different energy
effciency activities are available to the
commerciai/industrial customers. The newest
program offered in this sector, Easy Upgrades,
was launched in Idaho in February 2007 and in
Oregon in May 2007. The program is designed
to deliver energy efficiency and demand-side
savings to all existing commercial and industral
customers. Easy Upgrades offers a menu of
incentives for lighting, HV AC, motors, building
shell, plug loads, and grocery refrgeration.
With the launch of this program, the former
Oregon School Efficiency program was
discontinued since schools can now participate
in Easy Upgrades.
The Building Efficiency program for new
construction projects achieves energy savings
that are cost-effective at the time of
constrction. This program continues to offer
energy-saving improvements for lighting,
cooling, building shell, and energy control
efficiency options.
Both Building Efficien,?y and Easy Upgrades
participants can receive incentives up to
$100,000 for any projects completed.
The Custom Efficiency program, formerly the
Industral Efficiency program, was expanded to
include large commercial customers in 2007.
This program is intended for larger custom
projects.
IPC continues to offer its Oregon Commercial
Audits program to medium and small
commercial customers.
Commerciai/industrial sector direct program
expenses are shown by program in Figure 5
below.
Figure 5. 2007 Commercial/Industrial Sector Direct Program Expense
0%
16%
CommerciallIndustrial Sectr Programs
. Custom Effciency
mi Easy Upgrades
mi Buildìng Effciency
. Oregn Commercial Audits
Total
2007
Expenses
$3,161,866
$711,494
$669,032
$1,981
$4,542,392
Percnt ofExpe
69,6%
15.7%
14.1%
0,0%
100.0%
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngbloo, IPC
Page 35 of 80
Page 26 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Results
Total annual energy savings for the
commercial/industrial programs increased by
about 88%, from 20,139,514 kWh in 2006 to
37,790,192 kWh in 2007. See Table 12. See
Table 13 regarding the demand reduction
attibutable to 2007 commerciai/industral
program activity.
Table 12. Commercial/Industrial Sector Energy
Savings (kWh)
Building Effciency.................................
Easy Upgrades................,.,.......,...,.,.....
Oregon Commercial Audits ............. ......
Custom Efficiency........,',.............,.....,.,.
Total
kWh
2,817,248
5,183,640
N/A
29,789,304
37,790,192
Table 13. Commercialllndustrial Sector Demand
Reduction (kW)
akW Summer
Peak kW
Building Efficiency... ............... ....... ....
Easy Upgrades,........,',...........,""',....
Oregon Commercial Audits ...............
Custom Effciency...",.......,' ........,....,'
Total
322
592
N/A
3,401
4,314
454
780
N/A
3,622
4,856
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 36 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 27
Demand-Side Management
Commercial/Industrial Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Building Efficiency
Description
The Building Effciency program is available to
commercial and industrial customers involved
in the construction of new buildings or
construction projects with significant additions,
remodels, or expansions. Under this program,
customers are able to apply energy efficient
design featues and technologies to their
projects that would otherwise be lost
opportities for energy savings. Launched in
Idaho in the spring of2005, the program
expanded to Oregon in Januar 2006.
Menu offerings within the Building Efficiency
program include measures and incentives for
lighting, cooling, building shell, and control
efficiency options.
Program marketing enlists architects, engineers,
and other local design professionals. Monthly
e-mail updates are sent to building developers,
design professionals, contractors, building
owners, IPC field personnel, and other
interested parties.
Idaho Power Company
Through this program, IPC is a primary sponsor
of the Boise Integrated Design Lab, which
provides technical assistance and training
seminars to local architects and designers. Much
of this activity is coordinated and supported
. k iIthrough NEEA' s BetterBnc s program.
Results
The success of the program in 2007 can partially
be attributed to the addition of a group of three
control measures added to the menu of Building
Efficiency incentive opportnities.
Approximately 31% of Building EffCiency
participants took advantage of the energy
management control system, the demand control
ventilation, and/or the variable speed drives.
These measures resulted in savings of over
1,500MWh.
Participation
During 2007, a total of 81 applicants submitted
preliminary applications for projects to be
completed from 2007 to 2009. A total of
22 projects were completed and their incentives
awarded.
Energy Impact
The annual energy savings increased by almost
300% over the prior year, from 704,541 kWh in
2006 to 2,817,248 kWh in 2007. The peak
demand reduction increased by 34%, from
338 kW in 2006 to 454 kW in 2007.
2008 Strategies
In 2008, IPC wil make minor modifications to
the program in order to accommodate Idaho's
recent adoption of the IECC, effective Januar
1,2008. Eligibility requirements for three of the
14 measures changed for 2008.
Another change, effective February 1,2008, is
that all final applications for incentive payments
must be submitted within 60 days of project
completion.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-Q4
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 37 of 80
Page 28 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company
Commercial/Industrial Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Easy Upgrades
Description
In February 2007, Easy Upgrades was launched
in Idaho, followed by a May 2007 launch in
Oregon. The Easy Upgrades program was
designed to encourage commercial and
industrial energy-saving retrofits. The program
has six menus of eligible, energy-saving
measures and incentives, covering various
commercial energy-saving opportnities in
lighting, HV AC, motors, building shell, plug
loads, and grocery refrigeration.
Program marketing included advertising in key
business publications and providing
10 workshops in February and September. The
workshops were designed to network with
contractors, vendors, and other trade allies,
inform them of the Easy Upgrades program, and
provide the tools to promote it. Additional
program-related communications went out to
trade allies, commercial customers, and IPC
field personneL.
As part of this new program, a special
promotion for directly installed
VendingMiser™ controls was started in
November. The energy-saving plug-in device
Demand-Side Management
uses an occupancy-sensor based technology to
manage energy used by vending machines. By
the end of the year, over 1,000 controls were
installed.
IPC helps sponsor the Lighting Design Lab
(LDL) in Seattle through the Easy Upgrades
program. LDL provides technical assistance and
periodic local training seminars encouraging
energy-saving lighting. Additionally, IPC is a
sponsor ofNEEA's BetterBricksiI program,
disseminating general energy efficiency
information to commercial customers.
IPC also offered a special promotion for LEDs.
This promotion focused on holiday lighting.
Through a seasonal promotion, IPC provided a
per-bulb incentive to non-residential customers
to replace incandescent holiday lights with more
effcient LED lights. Eight facilities paricipated
in this promotion, resulting in savings of
11,779 kWh. High-profie community displays
were targets for this promotion in order to
showcase the benefits ofLEDs. The Winter
Garden Aglow display at the Idaho Botanical
Garden is a good example of that. They replaced
14,700 incandescent bulbs for an estimated
savings of7,996 kWh. Two local newspapers
covered this project. Signs posted near the
display educated over 26,500 attendees about
energy efficient LED lights.
Results
Participation
Durng the year, 219 pre-applications were
submitted and 104 projects were completed.
Those totals included eight pre-applications and
three completed projects in Oregon.
Energy Impact
The annual energy savings from the Easy
Upgrades program was 5,183,640 kWh, which
included the 1,116,288 kWh saved from
installng V endingMisers TM. The peak demand
reduction impact for the Easy Upgrades
program was 780 kW.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 38of80
Annual Report 2007 Page 29
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Customer Satisfaction
Input is regularly solicited from program
participants to assess their satisfaction.
Approximately one month after they receive
their incentive payment, IPC provides each
participant with a customer survey Web link.
The survey asks a series of customer satisfaction
questions about their participation.
As of Januar 2008, responses indicate that 48%
of the respondents first learned of the Easy
Upgrades program from their contractor,
supplier, or vendor. The result supports IPC's
focus on marketing and communicating with
those same trade allies.
A key question asked on the survey was
"Overall, how much would you agree that you
received an excellent value from Idaho Power
through this program?" Nearly 73% of the
respondents replied "Strongly Agree," and
nearly 12% replied "Somewhat Agree."
2008 Strategies
IPC wil continue promoting the program to
business and professional associations, wil
coordinate with trade alles, and wil continue
the VendingMiser™ promotion until 2,500 units
are installed.
In 2008, several new features wil be added. An
electronic lighting calculator for proposed
lighting retrofits wil be offered to both
customers and lighting contractors. This tool
wil easily analyze a project's energy savings
potential, indicate incentives available, and
show the net retu on investment. The lighting
calculator wil be coupled with a Web-based
electronic application. This should make the
application process easier for customers and
reduce processing time for IPC staff. A series of
one-page testimonials from program paricipants
is being created to promote the program. These
success stories wil be available as printed
documents and displayed on the IPC Web site.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 39 of 80
Page 30 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Commercial/Industrial Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Oregon Commercial Audits
Description
Available to all Oregon commercial customers
since 1983, the Oregon Commercial Audits
program identifies opportnities for commercial
building owners to achieve energy savings.
Evaluations, through energy audits, and
educational services are offered. Program
benefits and offering~ are communicated to the
target market through an anual mailing to each
customer in the commercial sector.
As was done in 2005 and 2006, IPC offered the
Saving Energy Dollars publication to customers
who wanted more information on saving energy
and reducing expenses. New in 2007 was the
Building Energy Efficiency Program (BEEP)
workshop, offered for free in lieu of an energy
audit, valued at $150 per participant. The
day-and-a-half workshop, held in Boise in
September, focused on proven, no-cost and low-
cost energy-saving techniques.
Results
In late August 2007, IPC mailed its annual letter
to all Oregon commercial customers. Customers
were notified of the availability of no-cost
energy audits and the IPC publication Saving
Energy Dollars. This mailing resulted in
16 customer responses for information or an
energy audit. Eight customers requested only
the Saving Energy Dollars publication. Eight
customers returned requests for energy audits.
IPC personnel conducted four ofthe audits and
a third-part contractor conducted the other four
audits. One customer took advantage of the free
pass to the BEEP workshop in September.
2008 Strategies
In 2008, the third-par energy auditing contract
is up for renewaL. IPC is planing to issue a new
Request for Proposal (RFP) from contractors for
futue energy audits. IPC is also evaluating the
potential for enhanced correlation between the
Oregon Commercial Audit program and the
Easy Upgrades incentive program by using the
energy audit as a tool to promote the Easy
Upgrades incentive program.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood,lPC
Page 40 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 31
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Commercial/Industrial Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Custom Efficiency
Description
Initially implemented as a pilot program in
2003, the Industrial Efficiency program was
selected for implementation as a result of the
2004 Energy Plan. An expansion of this
program was identified in the 2006 Energy Plan
and, as a result, the program was expanded in
2007 and renamed the Custom Effciency
program. It is offered to all large commercial
and industrial customers in Idaho and Oregon.
The Custom Efficiency program targets the
acquisition of peak demand reduction and
energy savings though the implementation of
customized energy efficiency projects at
customer sites.
Operationally, the program provides training
and basic education on energy effciency,
energy auditing services for project
identification and evaluation, and financial
incentives for project implementation.
The key components in facilitating customer
implementation of energy efficiency projects are
Page 32
energy auditing, customer training, and
education services.
Ipterested customers submit applications to IPC,
i~entifying potential projects applicable to their
trcilities. The applications must provide
spfficient information to support the energy
SrVingS calculations.
~roject implementation begins after IPC's
review and approval of an application, followed
~y the finalization of the terms and conditions of
t~e applicant's and IPC's obligations. When
Bossible, IPC conducts on-site power
monitoring and data collection, before and after
~roject implementation. The measurement and
'1erification process ensures that projected
energy savings are achieved. Verifying
a~plicants' information confirms that demand
rlduction and energy savings are obtainable and
'tithin program guidelines.
I
If changes in scope occur in a project, the
epergy savings and incentive amounts are
rtcalculated based on the actual installed
e~uipment. Large, complex projects may take as
l?ng as two years to complete.
i
I12007, the Custom Efficiency program
i~corporated several changes. The program was
~' panded to include all large commercial and
i dustrial customers. Previously, only customers
ith a basic load capacity (BLC) of more than
5,00 kW were eligible to paricipate in the
drogram. Incentive levels were increased to
10% of
the project cost, or $0.12/kWh,
whichever is less. The incentives previouslyjl ere capped at 50% of the project cost, or
0.12/kWh, whichever was less. In 2007, the
i centive cap was removed. Previously, the cap
as $100,000 per customer account.
I
te link between energy audits and completed
rojects is historically strong; thus, IPC
e panded the number of contractors available to
~ customer scoping audits from one company
i 2006 to four companies in 2007. Engineering Exhibit No, 1IPC-E-08-04
:trms were chosen for their expertise in all M. Youngblood, IPC
I Page 41 of 80
Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
major equipment areas and their ability to
provide resources for customers throughout
IPC's service area.
Results
The Custom Efficiency program has achieved a
high penetration rate, approximately 25%, with
the large commercial and industrial customers.
Participation
IPC reviewed and approved 87 applications for
incentive projects in 2007. A total of 49 projects
were completed in 2007, consisting of
29 companies at 37 separate locations, and one
Oregon project. Three more Oregon project
applicants are scheduled for completion in early
2008.
increased by 45%. Figure 6 shows Custom
Efficiency annual energy savings by measure.
2008 Strategies
In 2008, IPC plans to continue the expansion of
the Custom Effciency program through a
number of avenues. This wil include direct
marketing of the Custom Efficiency program by
IPC field staff. IPC wil continue to provide site
visits and energy audits for project
identification, technical training for customers,
detailed energy audits for larger, complex
projects, and delivery ofIndustral Efficiency
Allance (IEA)-sponsored continuous energy
improvement practices to customers.
Energy Impact
The Custom Efficiency program increased
energy savings in 2007 by 55% over the prior
year, from 19,212 MWh to 29,789 MWh.
Additionally, completed projects increased by
23% and approved incentive applications
Figure 6. 2007 Custom Effciency Measures Annual Energy Savings (kWh)
lighting
Refrgeration
Oter
Compressd Air
Pump
Fan
10,327,232
o 2,00,000 4,00,00 6,000,000 8,000,00 10,000,000 12,000,000
kWh
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 42 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 33
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
IRRIGATION SECTOR
OVERVIEW
The irrigation sector is comprised of agrcultual
irrgation customers representing approximately
6,200 individuals with over 16,600 electrical
service locations. Other irrgation users, such as
golf courses and parks, are assigned to other
sectors and are not eligible for DSM irrigation
programs.
In total, the irrgation sector represents
approximately 30% ofIPC's summer peak load
and i 2% of total system energy sales per year.
The load for this sector has not grown
significantly in many years; however, there is a
yearly variation in demand due primarily to the
impact of weather on irrgation needs.
Programs
IPC currently offers two programs to the
irrigation sector: Irrgation Peak Rewards, a
demand response program designed to decrease
peak demand, and the Irrgation Efficiency
Rewards, an energy efficiency program
designed to encourage replacement or
improvement of inefficient systems and
components.
Results
The Irrigation Peak Rewards program provided
significant peak reduction durng the summer of
2007, with an average peak load reduction of
28.9 MW and a maximum summer peak
reduction of37.4 MW. The maximum summer
peak reduction was approximately 18% higher
in 2007 than in 2006. This was due primarily to
changes in the program incentive strctue,
which caused more two- and three-day-per-
week participants.
The Irrgation Effciency Rewards program had
strong participation in 2007. However, the
maturity of the program and the early adoption
of the menu options by irrigators have caused a
leveling off of projects in 2007. Program
redesign, implemented in 2006, offered
increased incentive levels and provided.a menu
option program that is popular with irrgation
customers. The total energy savings for 2007
was 12,304 MWh on 819 projects across IPC's
service area. Table 14 shows the 2007 irrgation
sector's direct expenses, energy savings, and
summer peak demand reduction attributable to
Irrgation Peak Rewards and Irrgation
Effciency Rewards programs.
Table 14. 2007 Irrigation Program Summary, Energy Savings (kWh) and Demand Reduction (kW)
Irrigation Effciency Rewards................ ................
Irrigation Peak Rewards .......................................
Total
Direct
Expenses
kW Summer Peak
Demand Reduction
kWh Energy
Savings
12,304,073
N/A
12,304,073
3,407
37,441
40,848
$2,001,961
$1,615,881
$3,617,843
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 43 of 80
Page 34 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Irrigation Sector
Demand Response Program
Irrigation Peak Rewards
Description
The Irrigation Peak Rewards program was
initially implemented as a pilot program in 2004
and fully implemented in 2005 as a result of the
2004 Energy Plan planning process. In 2006, the
program became available to IPC's Oregon
customers.
It is a voluntary program targeted toward
agricultual irrgation customers with pumps of
75 horsepower or greater. The program
objective is to reduce peak electrcal load durng
summer weekday afternoons. Preprogrammed
electronic time-activated switches tu offthe
pumps of participating irrgation customers
during intervals predetermined by IPC in
exchange for a financial incentive.
Participants select one of three different options
for the months of June, July, and August. A
monthly demand credit is associated with each
of the one-, two-, or three-day options and is
paid based on the paricipating customer's
monthly biling demand. Electric timers are
programmed to tum off irrigation pumps durng
preprogrammed time periods associated with the
selected option.
During 2007, the following options and
associated demand credit incentives were
available to customers from 4 to 8 p.m.
weekdays: a one-day-per-week, $2.01 per kW
demand; a two-days-per-week, $3.36 per kW
demand; or a three-days-per-week, $4.36 per
kW demand. Incentive amounts credited to
customers' monthly bils are calculated
separately for each metered service point.
IPC made changes to the program in 2007, as
approved by the IPUC and OPUC.
Modifications increased the incentive amounts
for the two-days and three-days per week
options, and extended the program eligibility to
service locations with at least 75 horsepower, in
contrast to at least 100 horsepower required in
2006. A one-time $250 fee is required from
customers with pumps of75 to 99 horsepower
to help offset the cost of the switches and
maintain the program's cost effectiveness.
Results
Participation
Enlisted service points slightly increased durg
2007, due to the lowered horsepower limit.
Participation rates show the program achieved
19.5% participation with 947 service points out
of 4,852 eligible service points. In 2006, there
were 906 service points in Idaho and 13 service
points in Oregon. In 2007, there were
925 service points in Idaho and 22 service
points in Oregon.
Demand Impact
Each summer the program has produced
substantial and measurable impacts on peak
demand. During summer 2007, the program
produced an average load reduction across all
three months of28.9 MW, with an average of
32.8 MW load reduction in the month of July.
Maximum load reduction occured durng the
second half of June when an estimated
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 44 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 35
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
37.4 MW reduction was achieved. The
customers' peak reduction loads are scheduled
evenly each day of the week by IPC, based on
historical information on system peaks.
2008 Strategies
IPC plans to operate the Irrigation Peak
Rewards program without any changes to its
structure for the 2008 irrgation season.
However, in cooperation with the Idaho
Irrigation Pumpers Association and IPUC staff,
IPC is putting together a working group in the
spring of 2008 to review the curent program
and to investigate a dispatchable demand
response option for 2009.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngbloo, IPC
Page 45 of 80
Page 36 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Irrigation Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Irrigation Efficiency Rewards
Description
Initially implemented as a pilot program in
2003, the Irrgation Efficiency Rewards
program was fully developed following its
selection by the 2004 Energy Plan. Designed to
improve the energy efficiency of irgation
systems in IPC's service area, a wide range of
financial incentives and educational methods are
provided. The program has been offered in
Idaho since 2003 and in Oregon since 2006.
To meet the needs of various irrgation systems,
two separate options are available for major or
minor changes on new or existing systems.
The Custom Incentive Option provides
component upgrades and large-scale
improvements. For new systems, the incentive is
$0.25 per kWh saved above standard installation
methods, not to exceed 10% of total project
cost. For existing system upgrades, the incentive
is $0.25 per kWh saved or $450 per kW,
whichever is greater, not to exceed 75% of total
project cost.
The Menu Incentive Option is designed for
systems in which small maintenance upgrades
.
provide energy savings. Incentives vary based
on specific component replacement.
Payments are calculated on predetermined
average kWh savings per component. IPC
reviews and analyzes each proposal for a system
or component modification to determine and
verify the energy savings.
In addition to incentives, the program offers
customer education, training, and irrgation
system assessments. IPC agricultural
representatives sponsor, coordinate, conduct,
and present educational workshops for irrgation
customers, providing expert information and
training across IPC's service area. Energy audits
are provided to prospective customers by IPC
agricultual representatives to evaluate potential
savings.
Agrcultual representatives from IPC also
engage agricultural irrgation equipment dealers
in training sessions, increasing awareness of the
program and promoting it through the irrgation
equipment distrbution chanels.
Marketing efforts include direct mailings,
advertisements in agricultural publications, and
agricultual trade show participation.
Results
Participation
In 2007, a total of 819 projects were completed
with irrgation customers, of which 120 were
under the Custom Incentive Option and
699 were under the Menu Incentive Option.
Incentive payments to customers in 2007 totaled
$1,744,260, down from $2,477,598 paid in
2006. The decrease was due to a decline in total
number of projects in 2007.
Energy Impact
The energy impact of the program was
12,304 MWh of energy savings and 3.4 MW of Exhibit No, 1
peak load reduction in 2007. In 2006, the ener~ IPC-E-08-04
M. -Vóungblood, IPC
Page 46 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 37
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
savings was 16,986 MWh and 5.1 MW of peak
load reduction.
2008 Strategies
IPC plans to continue offering the program
without any changes in 2008. However, ongoing
IPC program reviews may result in adjustments
in the incentive levels, program strctue, and
marketing efforts as operational experience
merits.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood,lPC
Page 47 of 80
Page 38 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
MARKET TRANSFORMATION
Northwest Energy Efficiency
Allance (NEEA)
NEEA encourages and supports cost-effective
market transformation efforts in Idaho, Oregon,
Washington, and Montana. Through
partnerships with local utilities, NEEA
motivates marketplace adoption of energy
saving services and technologies, and
encourages regional education and marketing
platforms. NEEA provides training and
marketing resources across residential,
commercial, and industrial sectors.
IPC accomplishes market transformation in its
service area through membership and
coordinated activities with NEEA.
NEEA Activities
Industrial Effciency Allance (lEA)
Activities in Idaho
The IEA is a multi-year strategic effort designed
to improve energy efficiency in two regional
industres considered heavy energy users: the
food processing and the pulp and paper
industres. The IEA also works with companies
that produce equipment and provide services for
these industries and with the utilities that serve
them.
Participants achieve cost savings through the
adoption of energy efficient business practices.
The IEA provides expert support, resources, and
services to give companies tools and training to
make energy efficiency a core business value. In
exchange, participants are asked to commit to a
Continuous Energy Improvement Program,
which has the potential to increase production
capacity, improve equipment reliability, and
reduce operating costs and energy use by 5% to
20%. This effort is supported by providing
technical knowledge for individuals,
organizations, and manufacturing companies to
collaborate on energy efficiency
implementation. IEA members include the BP A,
regional utilities, the Energy Trust of Oregon
(ETO), the Oregon Department of Energy
(ODOE), and the Idaho Office of Energy
Resources (OER). Training activity in 2007
included three industral workshops
co-sponsored by the IEA, IPC, and others. This
training activity focused on pumps, motors, and
industrial refrgeration.
Commercial Allance Activities in Idaho
NEEA continued to provide support for
commercial energy effcient activities in Idaho
in 2007. NEEA continued funding the Boise
Integrated Design Lab and local BetterBricksiI
trainings and workshops. NEEA sponsored
Idaho's Fourth Annual BetterBricksiI Awards,
issued in October in conjunction with the Idaho
Energy & Green Building Conference. IPC's
commercial programs, Building Efficiency and
Easy Upgrades, are designed to leverage NEEA,
BetterBricksiI, and Boise Integrated Design Lab
activities.
Distribution Efficiency Initiative
In 2007, IPC continued to paricipate with other
northwest utilities in NEEA's Distribution
Efficiency Initiative project study.
Phase 1 Projects Completed
NEEA conducted a Distrbution Efficiency
Initiative Project study, which included a Load
Research project and Pilot Demonstration
projects. The Load Research project was
designed to establish the relationship between
applied voltage and energy, in addition to how
applied voltage affects demand for different
end-use load tyes such as electrc heating,
electrc water heating, and air conditioning. The
Pilot Demonstration projects controlled the
voltage at the substation in order to determine
the performance of different efficiency methods.
Phase I was concluded in 2007.
The NEEA study's final report shows that Exhibit NO.1
operating a utility distribution system in the IPC-E-08-04M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 48 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 39
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
lower half of the acceptable voltage range of
120 through 114 volts saves energy (kWh),
reduces demand (kW), and reduces reactive
power (i.e., kilovolt ampere reactive (kvar))
requirements without negatively impacting the
customer. The energy savings results are within
the expected values of 1 % to 3% total energy
reduction, 2% to 4% reduction in kW demand,
and a 4% to 10% reduction in kvar demand.
As part of the completion of this project, the
66 Home Voltage Regulators (HVRs) operating
in southern Idaho since March 2006 were
removed during the summer of 2007. The
purpose of the HVR was to adjust service
entrance voltage at the residence.
Project for 2007
A new pilot was implemented during the second
quarter of 2007 to demonstrate remote
end-of-feeder control of the station transformer
load-tap changer. The project uses wireless
communication between the end-of-feeder and
the substation to adjust the substation voltage
based on the measured end-of-feeder voltage.
Application of technology allows better control
of the end~of-feeder voltage.
Residential NEEA Activities in Idaho
NEEA continues to provide support for two
programs offered by IPC: ENERGY STARiI
Homes Northwest and ENERGY STARiI
Lighting. In the ENERGY STARiI Homes
Northwest program, NEEA offers technical
assistance, funding for certifications, and
builder and marketing support. In the Lighting
program, NEEA offers manufactuer and sales
coordination and marketing assistance through
its contractor, Fluid Market Strategies.
Other NEEA Activities in Idaho
In 2007, IPC participated with NEEA to develop
an RFP for the ENERGY STAR iI Homes
Northwest impact evaluation. This study wil
provide estimates for whole-house energy
savings of ENERGY STARiI-certified homes in
the Nortwest region. The evaluation approach
began development in November 2007.
Implementation of the analysis wil begin in
2008, and final results wil be provided in 2009.
During 2007, NEEA continued to support
building code improvements to jurisdictions in
Idaho in the form of funding for code training
and other activities. Funding supported the
efforts of the Idaho Building Code Coalition,
which was instrumental in moving the 2006
IECC through the Idaho legislative process. The
code was adopted during the 2007 legislative
session and went into effect January 1, 2008. Its
purpose is to increase energy effciency in new
construction by requiring improved building
practices for the residential and commercial
sectors.
Each year, NEEA underwites the Idaho Energy
Conference through a contract with the
Association of Idaho Cities. NEEA continues to
provide general information support to the
region by funding the EnergyIdeas
ClearinghouseiI and ConWebiI.
NEEA also fuded a variety of research projects
that were reported on in 2007. These reports are
valuable to IPC for providing information for
creating and evaluating IPC's programs. These
research projects included the Existing
Multifamily Tenant Appliance Effciency
Saturation Study; Single-Family Existing
Constrction Residential Stock Assessment;
Multifamily Residential New Constrction
Characteristics and Practices; and Residential
New Constrction Characteristics and Practices.
NEEA Funding
In 2005, IPC began the first year of the
2005-2009 contract and fuding agreement
with NEEA. Per this agreement, IPC committed
to fud $1,300,000 anually in support of
NEEA's implementation of market
transformation programs in IPC's service area.
Of this amount in 2007, 70% was funded
through the Idaho and Oregon Riders, and 30% r;~~~~~~o1
M. Youngbloo, IPC
Page 49 of 80
Page 40 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
was funded by a credit accumulated during the
previous contract period.
In 2007, IPC paid $891,472 to NEEA. The
Idaho jurisdictional share of the payments was
$846,898, while $44,574 was paid for the
Oregon jurisdiction. Other expenses associated
with NEEA activities, such as administration
and travel, are paid by IPC.
Preliminary estimates reported by NEEA
indicate that IPC's share of regional market
transformation MWh savings for 2007 is
28,601 MWh, or 3.3 aMW. IPC relies on NEEA
to report the energy savings and other benefits
of NEE A's regional portfolio of initiatives.
For further information about NEEA, visit their
Web site at www.nwalliance.org.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 50 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 41
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
ADVISORY GROUP (EEAG)
Formed in May 2002, the EEAG provides input
on formulating and implementing energy
effciency and demand reduction programs
fuded by the Rider. Currently, the EEAG
consists of 12 members from across IPC's
service area and the Northwest. Members
represent a cross section of customers, including
delegates from the residential, industral,
commercial, and irrigation sectors, as well as
representatives for the elderly, low income,
environmental organizations, state agencies,
public utility commissions, and IPC.
In 2007, the EEAG met three times: on
March 23, September 12, and November 14.
During the meetings, IPC requested
recommendations on new program proposals,
provided a status of the Rider funding and
expenses, updated ongoing programs and
projects, and supplied information on
DSM issues.
EEAG Program
Recommendations
The following section provides a review of the
input provided to IPC by the EEAG regarding
major program implementation and operational
issues in 2007. Please note that all operational
DSM programs have been reviewed by EEAG;
however, only substantial changes or
modifications associated with EEAG input are
presented below.
Residential Programs
Residential programs reviewed in 2007 included
Heatin~ and Cooling Efficiency, ENERGY
STAR Appliances, ENERGY STARiI Homes
Northwest, and AlC Cool Credit. In addition,
the group was provided updates for ENERGY
STARiI Lighting, Rebate Advantage, and
Energy House Calls.
Heating and Cooling Efficiency
. Look to Delivery Service Representatives to
recommend program contractors in their
area. (Delivery Service Reps have been
assigned specifc DSM tasks and goals in
2007, which wil be tracked against actual
performance.)
. Contact outside sources for advice regarding
the design of the HV AC program.
(Contractors, other utilities, and regional
HVA C program experts were consulted
extensively for the design of the Heating and
Cooling Effciency program.)
. Implement quality assurance in the Heating
and Cooling program. (Quality assurance by
a third party wil occur in approximately 7%
of all installs for this program.)
. To accurately measure A/C savings, strictly
measure using a Seasonal Energy Efficiency
Ratio (SEER) 13 baseline. (Cost
effectiveness for the Heating and Cooling
program used SEER 13 as the savings
baseline.)
. Implement a sales incentive for contractors
in the Heating and Cooling program.
(Contractors receive $50 for services
related to this program.)
. Offer a design workshop and training to
HV AC contractors. (Training workshops for
each region in ¡PC were held in 2007, and
additional workshops are planned in 2008.)
ENERGY STAR~ Appliances
. Take old refrgerators out of service.
(Currently exploring options to offer a
refrigerator recycling program.)
. Join with water utility to market clothes Exhibit NO.1
washers. (No local water utilities in ¡PCV YOu~:~~~~~¿
Page 51 of 80
Page 42 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
service area offer energy effciency
incentives at this time, but wil explore
avenues for joint marketing efforts.)
· Do not provide incentives for plasma
television sets. (It's unlikely that plasma TVs
would prove cost effective because of their
high energy use.)
· Collaborate with local appliance retailers.
(Developing relationships and materials for
appliance retailers to use as part of the
ENERGY STARiI appliance program.)
. An automated process would ensure that
applications and incentives are processed
efficiently. (Incentive processing was
automated in 2007 to increase accuracy and
improve customer response time.)
ENERGY STARiI Homes Northwest
· Educate mortgage lenders about ENERGY
STARiI Homes Northwest. (Lenders wil be
invited to realtor training sessions.)
· Several members suggested that the AlC
Cool Credit program be mandatory for
ENERGY STARiI Homes. It was also
suggested that customers who do not
participate in A/C Cool Credit have a higher
connection fee for their new homes. (IPC
has no plans to require customers to
participate in programs, the preference
being to pursue voluntary participation
which leads to better customer satisfaction.)
General Suggestions
· When a bil stuffer is sent out, follow up
with a co-marketing piece, like a radio or
newspaper ad. (Marketing plans wil include
opportunites for cross-marketing programs
through various media channels.)
. Perhaps limit the amount of information
included in the bills so that people are more
likely to read the bil stuffer. (Because of the
number of programs and the demand for bil
stuffer area availabilty, most slots wil be
filled throughout the calendar year on the
bil stuffer calendar.)
. Target those markets where customers may
not be expecting energy efficiency
messages. (Currently exploring ways to
co-market a bil stuffer with other utilities in
Boise.)
Commercial and
Industrial Programs
At the September EEAG meeting, IPC
presented an Easy Upgrades program report,
and offered proposals for a single-measure
promotion for the VendingMiser™ program and
a Holiday Lighting program for commercial
customers. Members provided the following
suggestions:
. Encourage short-term promotions to take
advantage of the market environment, such
as the Chrstmas tree lights.
(VendingMiser ™ program began in
December 2007 and wil go through
April 2008.)
. Large numbers of vending machines that
came out in the 1 990s are about to be
refurbished, and the region is looking at
partering with vending machine
manufacturers to improve energy effciency
in older models. (IPC wil investigate these
opportunites in the future.)
. The consensus of the group was to move
forward with the VendingMiser™
promotion, pending full, cost-effective
analysis. (The promotion launched in
December 2007.)
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, ¡PC
Page 52 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 43
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Irrigation Programs
The Irrigation Peak Rewards program is a
successful program, with visible megawatt
reductions in load observable at the system load
data level at 4 p.m. on scheduled summer
weekdays. A program update was provided at
the November EEAG meeting. Questions and
comments included:
· A question was posed regarding the
necessity of requiring customers to sign up
each year to participate in the Peak Rewards
program. (There are several reasons that
make it more effective to do it this way: crop
rotation, lease agreements that are not
finalized until the middle of the next year,
equipment issues, and quality assurance
issues.)
. Offer an increased incentive to customers to
entice themto sign up sooner. (An "early
install incentive" might get customers in the
program sooner, but not necessarily more of
them, because there are other constraints on
irrigators that prevent them from signing up.
One member stated that he has some
irrigation systems that wil never be put on
the program due to their complexity.)
Local Energy Efficiency Funds
(LEEF)
The EEAG was consulted regarding the purose
and project cap limit of the Small
Projectlducation Funds, which are now called
the Local Energy Efficiency Funds (LEEF).
When the Small ProjectlEducation Fund was
authorized in 2003, individual projects were
limited to $5,000. A proposal was made to
increase individual expenditures through this
fund, as the number of requests greater than
$5,000 has increased over the years.
Discussion focused on the relative merits of the
fund, and its flexibility in responding to
unsolicited proposals from customers.
The suggestion was made that if it looks like the
project could be tued into a program and made
available to others, that potential should be
pursued.
It was the general consensus of the group that
this fund should have the flexibility to fud
projects above $5,000 but, in most cases, not
exceed $10,000. It was also suggested that the
pool of fud dollars should be allowed to grow
as well so that fuds are available for beneficial
projects.
¡PC wil fund projects larger in scope in the
future, and solicit feedback from EEA G for
specifc proposals that exceed $10,000.
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 53 of 80
Page 44 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
OTHER PROGRAMS AND
ACTIVITIES
Residential Energy Efficiency
Education Initiative
IPCrecognizes the value of general energy
effciency awareness and education in creating
customer demand for, and satisfaction with, its
programs. Increased awareness of energy
efficiency and IPC's residential programs are
being achieved through the Residential Energy
Efficiency Education Initiative.
Activities
Program activities during 2007 included the
design and implementation of a five-class series
promoting energy efficiency to an adult
audience, titled Fall Energy Effciency and
Sustainability Series. Topics covered included
simple no- and low-cost ways to save energy,
weatherization, insulation, ventilation, green
building, sustainable building with Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED),
easy ideas of ways to re-think, reduce, reuse,
recycle, net metering, and renewable energy
sources. The classes were well attended all five
nights, with 50 to 100 attendees per night.
Another outcome of this program was to
produce printed materials to improve customer
awareness of energy saving ideas, including the
Summer and Winter Energy Savings Tip cards
and the Home Energy Effciency Audit
brochures.
Through use of the Internet, the Residential
Energy Efficiency Education Initiative program
reached out to IPC's customers and others
offering energy effciency ideas and solutions.
The IPC Web site pages related to energy
effciency information were evaluated and
updated.
In addition to conducting workshops and
seminars for local groups to promote IPC's
residential programs and energy savings ideas,
IPC conducted open houses and outreach
programs to build and foster employee
awareness for energy efficiency. The primary
goal was to focus on general efficiency and
increased participation in existing program
offerings.
Commercial Education
Initiative
IPC has long recognized the value and
importance of providing energy efficiency
information to commercial customers. Efforts to
develop a commercial customer energy
education initiative began in the fall of 2007.
The focus was on the development of a short-
term pilot program targeting small commercial
customers and the development of an energy
effciency education strategy for all commercial
customers.
During the fall of 2007, goals were established
and a marketing plan was developed to reach all
commercial customers with energy efficiency
education. Field research was conducted with
IPC personnel assisting in gauging the energy
education needs of the customers. Additional
research was conducted assessing the industr's
best practices for small business energy
efficiency education. An implementation plan
was developed and is due to launch in 2008. The
main objectives are to increase paricipation in
existing commercial DSM programs, enhance
customer satisfaction, and reduce energy use for
this customer segment. The Commercial
Education Initiative wil compliment and
support existing DSM program activities.
Local Energy Efficiency
Funds (LEEF)
Formerly called the Small Projects and
Education Fund, the purose of LEEF is to Exhibit No, 1. . . IPC-E-08-04
provide modest funding for short-term proJ~t~oungblood, ¡PC
Page 54 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 45
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
and activities that do not fit within other
categories of energy efficiency programs but
still provide a defined benefit to furthering DSM
targets.
In 2007, one project met these criteria. The OER
arranged for the installation and long-term
monitoring of a Hallowell International cold
climate heat pump during the 2007-2008
heating season in McCall, Idaho. The home was
previously heated with an electric forced-air
furnace and was certified in 2006 as an
ENERGY STAR(ß home. In 2007, LEEF
awarded $7,500 to support the research project
and to test the new heat pump's effectiveness in
a cold climate. In retu, OER wil provide all
data, data analyses, and reports that result from
this study.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, ¡PC
Page 55 of 80
Page 46 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company
REGULATORY INITIATIVES
This past year was the first of a three-year pilot
period during which IPC is testing the effects of
a Fixed-Cost Adjustment (FCA) and a
Performance-Based DSM Incentive. The two
pilots are being operated on a limited basis to
allow for a thorough evaluation to be conducted
prior to a broader application of the financial
mechanisms.
Fixed-Cost Adjustment Pilot
The FCA is a true-up mechanism that
"decouples," or separates, energy sales from
revenue in order to remove the financial
disincentive that exists when IPC invests in
DSM resources. On March 12,2007, the IPUC
issued Order No. 30267 authorizing a three-year
pilot of the FCA within the residential and small
commercial customer classes. Under the FCA,
rates are adjusted annually up or down to
recover or refund the difference between the
fixed-costs authorized by the IPUC in the most
recent rate case and the fixed-costs that IPC
actually received through energy sales during
the previous year. Through the application of
this true-up mechanism, IPC is not financially
harmed by decreases in energy sales within the
residential and small commercial customer
classes, thus removing any disincentives for IPC
to pursue DSM opportnities with those
customers.
The FCA pilot is limited to the residential and
small commercial classes in recognition of the
fact that, for these customers, a high percentage
of fixed costs are recovered through energy
charges. Confining the pilot to the residential
and small commercial classes also allows the
true-up mechanism to be tested on a limited
basis to minimize any unintended consequences.
Demand-Side Management
Penormance-Based DSM
Incentive Pilot
To compliment the FCA pilot, IPC is testing the
effects of a Performance-Based DSM Incentive
mechanism over the same three-year period. On
March 12,2007, the IPUC issued Order
No. 30268 authorizing the implementation of a
Performance-Based DSM Incentive pilot that
allows IPC to retain a portion of the financial
benefits resulting from DSM activities when
energy savings targets are exceeded. IPC is also
subject to a penalty under the incentive pilot
should it fail to meet energy savings levels
previously achieved. Durng the pilot period, the
incentive mechanism is being applied only to
the ENERGY STARiI Homes Northwest
Program. By applying this mechanism on a
limited basis, IPC is able to gain a better
understanding of the effects of a performance
incentive while minimizing the potential impact
to customers. IPC ultimately intends to use the
information gained during the pilot period to
develop a performance-based incentive
mechanism that can be applied to the entire
portfolio ofDSM programs.
Enhanced Commitment to
Energy Efficiency and DSM
As par of the FCA implementation process, IPC
is committed to enhancing its efforts towards
promoting energy efficiency in several key areas
including, but not limited to:
. A broad availability of efficiency and load
management programs.
. Building code improvement activity.
. Pursuit of appliance code standards.
. Expansion of DSM programs beyond peak
shaving/load shifting programs.
. Third-part verification.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 56 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 47
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Throughout 2007, and increasingly during the
last three quarters of the year after issuance of
IPCU Order No. 30267, IPC actively pursued
numerous, additional opportnities to promote
energy efficiency.
Availability of Efficiency and Load
Management Programs
IPC offers an array of energy effciency and
demand response programs spanning all of the
major customer segments. The majority of
IPC's DSM programs were available prior to
implementation of the FCA. However, since
implementation of the FCA, IPC has focused
additional resources toward energy efficiency
education and program marketing.
IPC continued to increase energy efficiency
awareness among its customers through a
variety of media outlets. Incremental education
and outreach activities in 2007 inch,lded
participation in Earth Day events, publication of
a Summer Tips card on energy effciency,
conducting a Fall Energy Efficiency and
Sustainability Series at the Boise Public Library,
and a publication of a Holiday Purchases
Energy Effciency Tips flyer. Additionally, the
publication of the Parters in Conservation
Calendar provided energy efficiency
information to program participants, trade alles,
and IPC employees. IPC also distrbuted energy
efficiency information via 22 media updates,
12 Customer Connection newsletters included in
monthly bils, six radio interviews, five bil
inserts, and one press release.
The promotion of energy efficient lighting
received additional focus in 2007. In the fall,
IPC sponsored a lighting workshop conducted
by the staff of the Seattle-based Lighting Design
Lab. IPC staff also conducted 17 in-store
customer education outreach events to inform
customers about the benefits of energy effcient
lighting. Furthermore, IPC developed and
implemented a communication strategy to
address customer concerns about the mercury
content of CFL bulbs and to educate customers
on the proper disposal of CFLs.
DSM staff provided program and general energy
effciency information to five engineering firms
and two state agencies. These direct marketing
efforts in 2007 within the commercial and
industrial customer segments were aimed at
architects and engineers to enhance their
awareness of IPC' s DSM programs and how
energy efficiency can be incorporated into new
projects.
IPC also incorporated the offerings of the IEA
through NEEA to IPC food processing
customers. In 2007, there were 19 facilities in
the IPC service area engaged in various degrees
with the IEA and the implementation of
Continuous Energy Improvement practices at
their facilities.
Other actions in 2007 included IPC joining the
BPA-sponsored Utility Sounding Board (USB).
Networking and regional coordination are
benefits of participation in this group.
IPC also brought grocery refrigeration experts to
Boise and put on grocery efficiency trainings
and co-sponsored a BEEP workshop in
September.
Building Code Improvement
Activity
In 2007, the Idaho legislature adopted the IECC
2006 Energy Code, which IPC staff supported
through the Idaho Building Code Coalition. The
new code went into effect in January 2008.
In 2007, IPC staff met with the Boise Climate
Protection Program Advisory Committee and
the Caldwell Planning Departent to support
efforts by these groups to improve residential
and commercial building codes. Both of these
meetings were an opportnity to educate staff
about the ENERGY STARiI Homes Northwest Exhibit No. 1
program and discuss requiring all residential, YOu~:~~~~~6
Page 57 of 80
Page 48 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
new constrction in their respective jurisdictions
to conform to the ENERGY STARiI Homes
Northwest standard.
Pursuit of Appliance Code
Standards
IPC contracted with Quantec, LLC, to conduct a
study of potential savings and costs associated
with enacting appliance effciency standards in
Idaho similar to those recently enacted in
Oregon. The results of Quantec's assessment
and recommendations wil be incorporated into
the 2009 Energy Plan to determine the
economic viability of adopting such standards in
Idaho.
Expansion of DSM Programs
Beyond Peak-Shaving/
Load-Shifting Programs
IPC looks for opportnities to enhance or
expand its DSM program offering. For example,
in 2007 a new incentive-based holiday lighting
program was offered to commercial customers.
This program was implemented on an
accelerated schedule to provide additional
energy savings within the commercial customer
segment in 2007 and to raise awareness of LED
lighting among all customer classes.
Additionally, a direct-install VendingMiser™
promotion began in 2007 and wil continue in
2008. This promotion will provide small and
large commercial customers with free controls
to cut energy use on their refrigerated beverage
vending machines. This promotion greatly
increased participation and energy savings. In
the first seven months of this program, IPC
received 136 applications for VendingMiser™
installation, and in the last two months IPC,
through its vendor, installed
83 VendingMisers™.
Late in 2007, IPC issued an RFP seeking
professional services to determine potential
DSM energy savings and peak load reduction
within IPC's service area. Nexant, a San
Francisco-based consulting firm, was selected to
conduct the DSM potential study and provide a
DSM simulation model, along with DSM
program recommendations that can be
implemented to achieve the identified potentiaL.
This project is expected to be completed by July
31,2008. The information provided by the
potential study wil serve as the basis for DSM
resource options analyzed in the 2009 Energy
Plan.
Third-Party Verification
IPC utilizes third-part consultants and agents
whenever possible, practical, and affordable.
Consultants verify the quality of work
conducted, the amount of energy savings
achieved, and also obtain data on energy
effciency and demand response measures and
programs. The following are examples ofIPC's
ongoing utilization of third parties to monitor
and verify its DSM program performance:
. IPC is a funder of, and participant in, the
Regional Technical Forum (RTF). The RTF
is an advisory committee established in 1999
to develop standards to verify and evaluate
savings of energy efficiency programs and
measures. IPC views the RTF as a reliable
third-par source for information on
programs and measures and used the RTF
databases to provide deemed savings for
some energy effciency measures.
. In 2007, IPC contracted with a third-part
consulting firm, Ecotope Consulting, to
reevaluate the ENERGY STARiI Homes
Northwest measures and savings after the
new IECC 2006 building codes were
implemented in Idaho. This analysis resulted
in several program changes, including a
revised incentive and revised assumed
energy savings per home for 2008.
. The ENERGY STARiI Homes Nortwest
program regularly utilizes certified Home
Exhibit No, 1Performance Specialists for independent IPC-E-08-u
M. Youngbloo,lPC
Page 58 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 49
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
third-part verification, ensuring that each
ENERGY STARiI home is being built to
ENERGY STARiI standards. The Idaho
OER then certifies each of these homes as
an ENERGY STARQ! home.
. The Energy House Calls program contracts
with a third part consultant to do quality
assurance on 5% of homes serviced by the
program. This consultant visits the selected
sites within approximately one month of the
energy house call and verifies that the
energy efficiency measures provided by
IPC's third-part installation contractor were
performed to program specifications.
· The Heating and Cooling Efficiency
program, new in 2007, has begu training a
third-part consultant to verify savings on
5- 10% of all projects and plans on
implementing this process in 2008.
¡PC's Internal Energy Efficiency
Commitment
IPC's commitment towards promoting energy
efficiency extends beyond encouraging,
incenting, and educating its customers. In 2007,
IPC committed to pilot an integrated design
approach for a new operations facility to be
constrcted in Lake Fork, Idaho. The Long
Valley Operations Center wil be the first new
facility built by IPC to use this process. This
method of project development brings the
owner, design team, contractors, and
commissioning agent together at the inception
ofthe project to take advantage of their
combined expertise and maximize coordination
throughout the process. Initial meetings defined
IPC's goals for the project, and the goals were
linked to potential LEED credits. Results
support a strong case for LEED Silver
certification and the potential exists for LEED
Gold certification on the project.
The design team's goal is to pursue all
10 energy efficiency credits, which would make
the facility at least 42% more effcient than the
American Society of Heating, Refrgerating, and
Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 2003
standards. Opportnities for renewable
generation and other innovative design solutions
wil be investigated throughout the design
phase. In addition to energy effciency, other
important IPC goals are to ensure the facility fits
well into the surrounding community while
providing local IPC employees with a functional
operations center. IPC's decision to take a
leadership position in high-performance
buildings and sustainable design for their own
facilities demonstrates not only enhanced
commitment to energy efficiency but can serve
as a model for other companies.
In 2007, IPC began retrofitting its Corporate
Headquarters (CHQ) with energy effciency
projects. In 2007, IPC increased the energy
effciency of the HV AC system at the CHQ by
installing a new system to centrally control and
better manage the system from an energy
perspective. IPC also implemented nighttime
lighting controls at the CHQ in order to gain
efficient use oflighting electrcity. IPC is
systematically replacing older, inefficient
lighting in its facilities with more efficient
lights.
Table 15 shows IPC energy savings in 2007 as
compared to both IPC operational targets as
well as IRP targeted savings. The operational
targets for the commerciai/industrial programs
were reduced from the original energy plan
targets to account for the timing of new program
development within the commercial sector.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 59 of 80
Page 50 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Table 15, 20071PC DSM Program Targets and Results
20071PC
Operational Targets
Demand Response Programs
Residential and Irrigation ... ...........................................
Energy Efficiency Programs
Residential..........."..,',..,"',..........,"'" ......,',..,"",..,",....
Commercialllndustrial ..,',..... ,..,'" ,..,.,........,',.. "",..,""',.
Irrigation""",...,',....,',...,"'" ....,........".. ......,',..,..,..,"",...
Total
MW
47,8
MWh
11,231
21,447
11,940
44,618
2007 Energy
Plan Targets
MW
39.4
MWh
11,230
24,397
5,200
40,827
2007 Savings
MW
48.2
MWh
12,441
37,790
12,304
62,535
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 60 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 51
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
ApPENDICES
The following financial and performance tables
provide a summary of program activity,
including program expenses, funding sources,
energy savings, 'and levelized costs for savings.
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 61 of 80
Page 52 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Appendix 1. Idaho Rider, Oregon Rider, BPA, and NEEA Funding Balances
2007 Beginning Balance ......,"',.. .....,"",......,..... ............,""""",..,...,""',..".,',.."...."..," ......"......,',..."..,..,
2007 Funding plus Accrued Interest."",....,',.............."..,"'" ..,'.. '.....,""',..,'" ,...".."...,..,............,..,....."..,.,
Total 2007 Funds
2007 Expense"...,..,.."..,."..,"",......".,",......"..,..,...,"",.,",.......,..,',...,..,.,"',..."......,"",..,"',. ",.,..,.."...."...
2007 Year-End Balance
$5,934,463.21
9,036,071,75
14,970,534,96
(13,487,460.38)
$1,483,074.58
2007 Beginning Balance"...."',..........,..,..,...,""',.....,"",......,......,.."........".,,..,",........,..,""" .....,' .......,...".
2007 Funding plus Accrued Interest.",,',..,..,""",....,""" .....,.......,"',.......,.,",..".,....,',...... ..'..,............'.....,'
Total 2007 Funds
2007 Expense",..,.,.."."..,....".".".,""",..,...,""',.,.,.,.,.,....,.,..,...,.".,......".,',...,"',..........,.,..". ........,...".,..,..
2007 Year-End Balance
$393,731,19
425,682.64
819,413.83
(409,188.37)
$410,225.46
Total Funding and Accrued Interest October 2001-December 2006 .........................................................
2007 Funding plus Accrued Interest.".......,..,",...........,................,',......,",..,......,'""',..,........,',.................
Total Funds May 2002-December 2007
Total Expense-Inception through December 2006",....,',........,""',......,"',....,..,.....,',.."......,....,..."..........
2007 Expense.., ........,",........,... ........"., ......,",...........,"...,.. ........,.,' .......,.,......,...,", ....................,.......,....,'
Total BPA Funded Expenses ...........................................................................................................
2007 Year-End Balance(a)
$1,300,000.002007 IPC Contractual Obligation....,..,........,...........,..,.....,',......,..".......,"",......,',........."...,........................
Credit Applied tp 2007 Contractual Obligation..... ........ .......... ............. ................... ........... .................,
Interest Credit Applied to 2007 Contract Obligation ....................................... ......................... ............
Interest Credit Applied to 2008 Contract Obligation(b).........................................................................
Total 2007 Cash Payments by IPC ............................................................................................................
Credit Balance
Beginning Balance Funds Held by NEEA ............. ........ ........ ............... ....... ............. ...................... .....
2007 Credit Applied to Contract Obligation .... ......... ......... ........... ................. ............... ............ ....... .....
$2,909,157.08
247,732.51
3,156,889.59
(2.909,157.08)
(200,685,96)
(3,109,843.04)
$47,046.55
(325,588.00)
(68,159.00)
(14,781.00)
891,472.00
(976,771,00)
325,588.00
2007 Year-End Credit Balance ($651,183.00)
(a) The 2007 balance of SPA funds was committed to two Solar 4 R Schools projects prior to the suspension of SPA funding in 2007. These
projects are scheduled for completion in 2008,
(b) The first quarter invoice for the IPC 2008 contractual obligation to NEEA was processed in December 2007 with the amount scheduled
to be amortized over the first quarter. Interest credit was immediately recognized in 2007,
Exhibit No, 1
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 62 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 53
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Appendix 2.2007 DSM Expenses by Funding Source (Dollars)
Idaho Oregon
Sector/Program Rider Rider SPA IPC Total Program
Energy Efficiency/Demand Response
Residential
AlC cooi Credit....................... ....................2,421,461 0 0 4,692 $ 2,426,154
Appliance Program.......... ........ ............. .......8,746 460 0 69 $9,275
Energy House Calls.. ................. ......... .........251,743 3,349 80,830 450 $336,372
ENERGY STAR'" Homes Northwest... ........451,775 12,249 0 11,020 $475,044
Heating and Cooling Effciency.... ................482,051 3,289 0 2,871 $488,211
Oregon Residential Weatherization.. ...........0 0 0 3,781 $3,781
Rebate Advantage.......................................58,854 4,609 25,073 733 $89,269
ENERGY STAR'" Lighting............................519,818 11,787 15,595 10,445 $557,646
WAQC,...,......,...".,"""',...,."..,...,",."..,..,,",.0 0 28,035 1,295,588 $1,323,624
Commercial/Industrial
Commercial Building Efficiency..... ..............,661,485 5,766 0 1,781 $669,032
Easy Upgrades ...............................,............680,376 28,014 0 3,105 $711,494
Oregon Commercial Audit..... ......................0 1,800 0 181 $1,981
Custom Effciency....,...................................3,032,047 110,634 0 19,185 $ 3,161,866
Irrigation
Irrigation Effciency Rewards .......................1,881,116 93,924 0 26,922 $ 2,001,961
Irrigation Peak Rewards............. ..................1,520,106 54,747 0 41,028 $1,615,881
Energy Efficiency/Demand Response Total 11,969,578 330,627 149,534 1,421,852 $13,871,592
Market Transformation
NEEA......",..............,',...............,.,",.......,""846,898 44,574 0 1,868 $893,340
Market Transformation Total 846,898 44,574 0 1,868 $893,340
Other Programs and Activities
Commercial
Commercial Education Initiative...................25,427 1,314 0 82 $26,823
Other
BPA CRC Renewables ........,.......................0 0 31,645 0 $31,645
Distribution Efficiency Initiative(a) .................6,514 343 0 2,130 $8,987
DSM Direct Program Overhead......, ...........,54,339 2,465 0 105 $56,909
LEEF(b) ..,....."..,"'............,....,"'..,.....,,"',.....7,571 (50)0 0 $7,520
Other Programs and Activities Total 93,851 4,072 31,645 2,317 $131,885
Indirect Program Expense
DSM Accounting and Analysis.. ........... ........564,129 29,367 0 139,006 $732,503
Energy Efficiency Advisory Group ...... .........2,488 109 0 0 $2,597
Special Accounting Entries ........ .......... ........10,516 439 19,507 $30,462
Indirect Program Expense Total 577,133 29,915 19,507 139,006 $765,561
Totals $13,487,460 $409,188 $200,686 $1,565,043 $15,662,378
(a)lpC portion of Distribution Effciency Initiative expenses wil be reversed in 2008.
(b)Oregon correction for 2006 entry for bulbs purchased and used in Idaho,
Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 63 of 80
Page 54 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
ll ~~S l"to ~~
-.0 (l N 0 ~u:..
e ¡8 ,.~~l"N).,~0l,l z 0 z 0 0 0 z ,.:i g ci g ci ci g g g g ci gII0~Ul Ul Ul EI0t-!0
i ~~S ~N ~re 0 (l ir l(to ~N ~4i ~?,.0 ~'l ..i s:z z 0 z 0 0 0 0 z 0 0
..;:~ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci g ci ci:i Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul fi Ul .,"-
II W..:i ~\I ~~0 to I"00 to to to to N N ~N 00tiNN,.N "I N N ,.....II ..~z ZII
:&..
..:'N ..u:"I 0 N I"II .i ":(0 ;0 'f ~N 0e (I c ~I"(0 u:"I
e ll II 0 ~....
:i A-S ~,.
ti en ll
CJ Qc
'S;8l ~~to t:00 (l i:i:~0 ~N)II (l ....0 ~I"
en ii :0
¡
00 (0 "I ~(l 0 0 ..N)q:i 2'g ai ~ai ~g t¡i-..m ~c II ~..00(l N N Il ..I".i c ~,.r?N ió cÐ NwN..
æ to N I"ig 0)(J N (j ('0 to ..æ N
:I I"~CD CD to "l 0 M CD I"'û .,M i-'"to ....(0 10 0 a,(0 I"
1;'P cÐ cÐ tJ ti a:-.1l N -.Î æ N ..N -.(l I'~ig $¡..00 to IJ (;ø,.N ..":IJ ~(0..tl N Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul ~i~~
....Ul Ul Ul
ti II ..-iiti00l .,;to N ~~....$10 i-Pl ~..
~-~to I"~-r IJ ,.g ~..i:~N l"N 0 0 "'l-i 'P ti ió ~ió ,.tJ r?cÐ Ò t"cÐ ..~..8N1õ_.,¡to IJ Ul o:0)..§,.Ul ~.J!"I_M to ~Ul ~.,I"ll ll Ul ("f)s ~~(;;¡Ul..
~
,!'8-B '"
¡r 2l :6 s S IV Sciß13ææißl(:t ,~it 1l l l ,¡!§E ~E E Ii E E E E 'ë"'ë'
~
0 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 e e;:"-......0 ........Q.Q.0-II Q.Q.:t CD ~(l::II "t ~l"S ~~"I M S;..N C!
13 A-t ~
i
N ..N Q;to l"I"..M ..r?cÐ-e ~....N
E ""
een
I
e 1õ c:0-j l~ã ~~c:-I:(J Z .!!II '"
¡
oi :5 :ci '"'"c ~æ '0II~..E i §E w ;:ii~'",2 Q -=!i0Ei
~
:i -l c
~.
II -(t ""0 CD ~E g giil!~~0)N tg .l c ti 1\.91xi:
g¡¡!¡!0 1\i:1I II E 1\l!æ Æ :i ft ci 13 e E 'õ ~e-::en en '0 ti ;;
j IE IE0Q.0 C ~~J ~
0Õi:1i 21 :i )-)-ft W æ 0 w
~.!!E 0 0 ;i i:
2'~C)Q
8,.æ Q ;:I:1i ~i:
l!0 i c ,!l ii c II C 8i ¡0"'II 'l .l 0
~
'6 ""c ë ~:5 i II W W II !~
e '5 ti !ti ¡Q
:E i c z z CD CD e 1I :i ::Cl :EG)c(W W w :i 0 ii 8 co w 0 '0 0
:EQ.A-.5 Exhibit No,1
Q.IPC-E-08-04c(M.Youngblood,IPC
Page 64 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 55
lJ Q)
co CD 010)
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

3
.

2
0
0
7

D
S
M

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Su
m
m
e
r
Pe
a
k
De
m
a
n
d
1
d
l
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Ut
i
l
i
y
b
)

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
1
ç
l
(O
O
/
l
a
r
s
)

(
O
O
/
J
a
r
s
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
Pa
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)

(
U
n
i
t
s
)
(k
W
h
)
(k
\
i
NE
E
A
(
3
)
$8
9
3
,
3
4
0

$
8
9
3
,
3
4
0
28
,
6
0
1
,
4
1
0
Re
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
(
4
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
o
n

I
n
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
Ot
h
e
r
SP
A

O
t
h
e
r

C
&
R
O

a
n
d

C
R
C
$2
6
,
8
2
3
$2
6
.
8
2
3
$3
1
,
6
4
5
$8
,
9
8
7
$5
6
.
9
0
9
$7
.
5
2
0
,
0
0
$2
5
,
9
3
8
,
5
$
0
$3
1
,
6
4
5
$8
,
9
8
7
$5
,
9
0
9
$7
.
5
2
0
.
0
0
$1
4
,
8
9
6
.
8
1
7
$7
6
5
,
5
6
1
$1
5
,
6
6
2
,
3
7
8
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
o
n

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
DS
M

D
i
r
e
c

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

O
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
Lo
c
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

E
f
f
e
n
c
y

F
u
n
d
s
To
t
a
l

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

D
i
r
e
c
t

E
x
p
e
n
s
e
In
d
i
r
e
c
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

E
x
p
e
n
s
e
To
t
a
l

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e
1
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
9,
0
0
91
,
1
4
5
,
3
5
6
5'
r
.
7
2
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
--
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
Le
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

C
o
s
t
/
a
)
To
t
a
l
Ut
i
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
ï
l
N
h
)

(
$
ï
W
h
)
7
$0
.
1
3
5
$0
,
1
3
5
~:Jc:!l::CD
'8;:!'oo..
(a
)

L
e
v
e
l
ì
z
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

In
p
u
t
s

f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

P
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
,
(b
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

C
o
s
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
,
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

C
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o

a

p
r
o
r
a

f
r
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

I
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

as

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(d
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

W
i

r
e
d
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.
(1
)

P
a
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t

c
o
s
t
s

u
s
e
d

t
o

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

T
o
t
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
O
O
t

i
s

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d

a
t

2
4
%

o
f

U
t
i
l
t
y

c
o
t
(2
)

M
e
a
s
u
r
e

L
i
f
e

i
s

w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

e
n
e
r
g
y

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

o
f

cu
s
t
o
m

o
p
t
i
o
n

(
1
5

ye
a
r
s
)

a
n
d

m
e
n
u

o
p
t
i
o
n
s

(
5

y
e
r
s
)
.
(3
)

T
h
e

k
W
h

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

a
r
e

p
r
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s

f
r
o
m

N
E
E
A
.

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
O
$
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

o
n
l
y

Ut
l
i
t
y

c
o
t
.

w
h
i
c
h

u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
s

t
h
e
a
e
t
u
a
l

t
o
t
l
.
(4
)

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e

e
x
p
e
s
e
s

i
n

2
0
0
7

w
e
r
e

a
l
l
o
e
t
è
d

a
m
o
n
g

a
l
l

r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

g
r
o
p
s
.
¡:~
"0

c
:
ni

:
:

-

m
CO
C
O

"
O
x
C1

!
2

C
1
:
:
~8

m
2
:
..
.

a
.

i

-
O'

O
z
;;
;
;
6
~
o
C
1
.
i
.
.
o CD3 Q):Ja.i(Ja:CD š:Q):JQ)
co CD3 CD:J-ã:Q)::o lJ ~CD.,()o3 -g:J-.
5'::c:!!:;(l
"0o;:Noo-.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-

Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7
To
t
a
l

Co
s
t
s
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
a
e
d
Co
s
t
(
a
)
Så
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k
Oe
m
.
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
!
)
(a
k
l
l

(
k
i
l
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
(Y
f
:
r
'
)
Pa
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t
(
b
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Ut
i
l
l
t
(
e
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Rø
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
Al
C

C
o
o
l

C
r
e
i
t
20
0
3
20
4
$2
7
M
4
5
$2
6
9
,
8
0
15
9
10
20
0
4
42
0
$2
8
7
,
2
5
3
$2
7
4
,
6
8
6
40
2
10
20
0
5
2.
3
6
9
$7
5
4
,
0
6
$7
1
7
.
9
0
2
2.
7
4
8
10
20
0
6
5.
3
6
9
$1
,
2
3
5
,
7
6
$1
,
1
3
1
,
4
3
9
5,
6
3
7
10
20
0
7
13
.
6
9
2
$2
,
4
2
6
,
1
5
4
$2
,
1
9
9
,
8
6
10
,
7
6
2
10
To
t
a
l
N/
A
$4
,
9
7
8
,
5
8
9
$4
,
5
9
3
i
9
3
NJ
A
10
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

P
e
a
k

R
e
w
a
r
d
s
20
0
4
58
$3
,
7
1
4
$1
8
5
,
0
0
5.
5
9
7
10
20
0
5
89
4
$1
,
4
6
,
2
8
2
$4
7
9
,
4
8
4
40
.
3
2
3
10
20
0
6
90
$1
.
3
2
4
,
4
1
8
$2
3
9
.
9
7
7
31
,
8
3
6
10
20
0
7
94
7
$1
.
6
1
5
.
8
1
$2
3
9
,
8
5
6
37
,
4
4
1
10
To
t
a
l
NJ
A
$4
,
7
5
3
,
2
9
5
$1
,
,
1
4
4
.
3
2
2
N/
A
10
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
l
i
t
y

R
.
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
!
W
h
)

(
$
!
W
h
)
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l

l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
,
(l
:
)

P
e
r
l
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

ef
f
c
i
è
r
e
y

pr
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c

a
n
n
u
å
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

W
I
i
c
:
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
.
(e
)

T
h

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
s
t

i
l
u
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
f
'
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

O
S
M

p
l
'
g
r
a
m
,
(d
)

T
h

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
r
a
m

fr
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
$
i
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d
"

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

/
8
.
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
i
o
n
.
(I
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

W
I
e
r

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
t
o
n

i
s

d
o
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(1
)

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
s
t

r
e
s
t
a
e
d

f
r
o
m

$
3
2
0
,
3
0
9

i
n

pr
i
o
r

h
i
s
t
o
r
l

re
n
g

t
o

r
e
f
f
e
c
t

a
l
l

f
u
n
d
i
n
g

s
o
u
r
c
e
.
(2
)

P
e
a
k

k
W

a
c
h
i
e
v
e
d

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

m
i
d
-
w
e
k

l
o
a
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

s
c
h
e
d
U
l
e
,
(3
)

M
a
x
i
m
u
m

s
u
m
m
e
r

p
a
a
k

k
W

a
c
h
i
e
v
e
d
.
"U Q)
co(l oi-.
~d
'"

c
:
Il
:
:

-
m
CO
C
O

'
"
x
co

!
2
0
:
:
o
i

_
.
~8
.

r
:
~
0-

°
z
;=
e
6
~
oO
.
¡

.
.
õ:Q)::o "U ~.,()o3"0 Q)::-.
(1
)
(2
)
(3
)
(3
)
o(l3 Q)::a.
i(ja:(l š:Q)::Q)
co(l3(l::-
lJ Dl
co CD oi()
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-

Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
n
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
l
z
e
d
Co
s
t
S
(
8
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
¡
i
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Ut
l
i
(
C
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e
De
m
a
n
d
C
e
)
Pe
a
k

M
e
a
s
u
r
e
De
m
a
'
f
i
i
:
l
(
f
)

L
I
f
e
(k
l
A

(
Y
e
a
r
s
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
t
y

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
!
W
h
)

(
$
!
W
h
)
Ap
p
l
i
a
n
c
e

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
$9
,
2
7
5
$9
,
2
7
5
En
e
r
g
y

H
o
u
s
e

C
a
l
l
s
20
0
3
20
0
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
$1
6
7
.
0
7
6
$7
2
5
,
9
6
1
$3
7
5
,
6
1
0
$3
3
6
,
7
0
1
$3
3
6
,
3
7
2
$1
,
9
4
1
,
7
4
0
42
0
1,
7
0
8
89
1
81
9
70
0
4,
5
3
8
$1
6
7
,
0
7
6
$7
2
5
,
9
8
1
$3
7
5
,
6
1
0
$3
3
6
,
7
0
1
$3
3
6
,
3
7
2
$1
,
9
4
1
,
7
4
0
(a
k
l
A
60
2
,
7
2
3
2,
3
4
9
.
,
7
8
3
1.
7
7
5
,
7
7
0
71
7
,
2
4
4
69
9
,
8
9
9
6,
2
0
5
,
4
1
9
69
26
8
20
3 89 80
70
8
20 20 20 20 20 20
$0
.
0
2
3
$0
.
0
2
5
$0
,
0
1
7
$0
.
3
5
$0
.
0
3
9
$0
.
2
6
$0
.
0
2
3
S0
.
2
5
$0
.
0
1
7
$0
.
0
3
5
SO
.
0
3
9
$0
.
0
2
6
Ca
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l

l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

I
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o
m

¡
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d
c
:
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

lo
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
o
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

Y
f
l
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
t
y

c
o
s
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t
i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
,
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
â
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

¡
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a
w
n
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

,
.

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
.

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
i
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

Î
$

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
,

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

'
'
f

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
Q
n
s
e
i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
,
(4
)

U
t
i
i
t

c
o
t

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r
m

$
1
8
3
.
6
5
3

i
n

p
r
i
o
r

h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l

r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
.
(5
)

U
t
i
l
i
t

c
o
t

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r
m

$
7
2
5
,
7
3
2

i
n

p
r
o
r

h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l

r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
.
;i::::Cæ.~'8;:I\oo-.
~~
"O
c
.g

e
.

'
õ

¡
p
co

2
:

0

:
:
o
i

_
.
~8
.

r
;
g
s.
-
-
~
~
00

"
0
6
,
00
"
"
.
.
(4
)
(5
)
o CD3 Dl::a.i(Ja:CD :sDl::Dl
co CD3 CD::-a:Dl
:To lJ ~..()o3'0Dl::
'c
):::::c:æ.
::CD
"8;:Noo..
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
a:
II=ro iJ ~..()o3'0II::-.
N:
o
m
l
n
a
l

L
e
V
é
l
i
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
l
a
)
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k

M
e
a
s
u
r
e
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
l
)

L
i
f
e
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l
U
t
i
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
/
k
W
h
)

(
$
!
W
h
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
Pa
n
l
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Ut
i
l
l
t
y
(
e
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
f
Y
e
a
(k
V
V
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(a
k
V
V
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
EN
E
R
G
Y

S
T
A
R
I
$

H
o
m
e
s
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
20
0
20
0
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
°
$1
3
,
5
9
7
$1
3
,
5
9
7
0
44
$1
4
0
.
1
6
5
$3
3
5
A
3
7
10
1
,
2
0
0
12
88
25
$0
.
1
0
3
$0
.
2
4
6
($
)
20
0
$.
2
5
3
.
1
0
5
$3
1
5
,
3
1
1
41
5
,
6
0
0
47
40
0
25
$0
.
4
5
$0
,
0
5
6
m
43
9
$4
6
9
.
6
0
9
$6
0
2
,
6
5
1
91
2
.
2
4
2
10
4
87
8
25
$0
.
0
3
8
$0
.
0
4
9
(a
)
30
3
$4
7
5
.
0
4
$5
6
6
,
2
4
7
62
9
.
6
3
4
72
60
6
25
$0
.
0
5
6
$0
.
0
6
7
98
&
$1
,
3
5
1
,
5
2
0
$1
,
8
3
3
,
2
4
2,
0
5
8
,
6
7
6
23
5
1,
9
7
2
25
$0
.
4
9
$0
.
0
6
6
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l

l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o

¡
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c

pl
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e
l
O
$
e
s
,
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
C
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

¡
P
C

an
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

wh
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d
'
"

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
.
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
.

e
x
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
,

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
O
f
k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

is

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
,
(6
)

E
n
e
r
y

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

N
E
E
A

s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
i
z
e
d

p
e
r

h
o
m
e

k
W
h

s
a
v
i
n
g
s
.
(7
)

R
e
v
i
s
e

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

h
o
m
e
s

r
e
r
t
e
d

c
e
r
t
i
f
i
e
d

t
o

2
0
0

f
r
o
m

2
0
3

t
o

a
l
i
g
n

w
i
t
h

i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s

r
e
a
l
i
z
e
d
.

a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d
.
lS
)

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
s
t
s

a
n
d

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

o
v
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
d

b
y

$
1
.
5
0
0

d
u
e

t
o

p
a
y
m
e
n
t

e
r
r
r
s
;

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

a
n
d

l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t

h
a
v
e

b
e
e
n

a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d

t
o

r
e
f
l
e
c

c
e
r
t
e
d

h
o
m
e
s

o
n
l
y
.
~co CD 01(0
o CD3II::i:i(/a:
CD s:II::IIco CD3 CD::-
~-.o
iJ

i
:
~c
5

'
6
~
(1

s
z

(
"

:
T
o
i

_
.
~8
.
r
:
g
;
o.

O
z
;;

=
¡

6

~
o(
"
,
¡
.
.
"'Q)
co CD 0)o
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e
De
m
a
n
d
(
E
I
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
é
v
e
l
l
z
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
Pe
a
k

M
e
a
s
u
r
e
De
m
a
n
d
(
f
)

L
i
f
e
(k
l
N

(
Y
e
a
r
s
)
Pa
i
1
l
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
l
N
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

R
é
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
ì
W
h
)

(
$
I
k
W
h
)
Ut
i
l
l
t
y
(
C
l
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
l
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Or
e
o
n

W
e
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
(S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

7
8
)
Re
b
a
t
e

A
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
20
0
3
20
0
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
l
20
0
3
20
0
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
0
$(
9
4
3
)
0
(9
)
4
$1
.
0
5
7
$1
,
0
5
7
0
0
4
$6
1
2
$3
,
0
8
7,
9
2
7
1
25
$0
.
0
0
6
$0
.
0
3
4
0
$4
,
1
2
6
$4
,
1
2
6
0
(1
0
)
1
$3
,
7
8
1
$5
,
5
8
9
9,
9
7
1
1
25
$0
.
0
2
8
$0
,
0
4
2
9
$8
,
6
3
4
$1
4
,
3
8
17
,
8
9
8
2
25
$0
.
3
6
$0
.
0
6
0
(1
1

)
73
$2
7
.
3
7
2
$7
9
,
3
9
9
22
7
,
4
3
4
26
45
$0
.
0
0
8
$0
,
0
2
2
(1
2
)
10
5
$5
2
.
1
8
7
$1
7
8
,
7
1
2
33
2
,
5
8
7
38
45
$0
.
0
1
0
$0
.
0
3
4
98
$4
6
,
1
7
3
$1
5
8
,
4
6
2
31
2
,
3
1
1
36
45
$0
.
0
0
9
$0
.
0
3
2
10
2
$5
2
.
6
7
3
$1
4
0
,
2
8
9
33
3
,
9
4
38
45
$0
.
0
1
0
$0
.
0
2
7
12
3
$8
9
.
2
6
9
$1
8
2
,
1
5
2
55
4
,
0
1
8
63
45
$0
,
0
1
0
$0
,
0
2
1
50
1
$2
6
7
.
6
1
5
$1
3
9
,
0
1
4
1.
7
5
9
,
8
4
20
1
45
$0
.
1
0
$0
.
0
2
7
(8
)

N
o
m
ì
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e

o
n

f
i
n
a
r
i
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

lo
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
o
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
,

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
í
b
e
r
s
.

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
a
s
e
n
t
l
t
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
,
(c
)

T
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

co
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

in
c
u
r
r
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
,
(d
)

T
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
l

e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
a

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
o

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

f
P
C

a
n
d

I
t
s

o
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
,
(&
)

A
v
e
r
a
g

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

/
8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
t
í
o
n
,
(1
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
e
l
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
,

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
M
e

i
$

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(9
)

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
s
t

r
e
f
e
c
t
s

c
o
l
l
e
c
e
d

f
u
n
d
S

o
n

p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s

b
a
d

l
o
a
n

w
r
i
t
e
o
f
f
s
,
(1
0
)

W
i
l
y

C
O
$
t

r
e
f
l
s

o
n
l
y

a
u
d
i
t

a
n
d

a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

c
o
s
;

t
h
e
e
r
e
e

w
a
s

n
o

f
u
r
t
h
e
r

a
c
t
i
i
t
i
y

i
n

2
0
0
6
,
(1
1
)

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
o
n

i
n
o
l
u
d
e
s

b
a
d

l
o
a
n

w
r
t
e
o

e
x
p
n
s
e

a
n
d

f
u
n
d

c
o
l
l
e
c
e
d

f
r
o
m

lo
a
n
s

p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y

w
r
i
e
n

o
f
f
.
~
(
1
2
)

U
t
i
l
t
y

c
o
t

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r
o

$
3
7
,
3
1
9

t
o

r
e
ß
e
c

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
e
n
s
e
.
¿
"0

c
:
Il
:
:

-
m
ec
c
e

"
O
x
CD
!
2
0
:
:
~8

r
\
ê
:
..

0
.

i

-
a_
_
i
$
g
:
CI

"
0

b
'
oO
.
r
.
.
5'::c:!!;0 CD
'8::Noo..
o CD3 Q)::e¡(Ja:CD š:Q)::Q)
co CD3 CD::-0-Q)::o "'~CD.,b'3i:Q)::i.
5'::i:9l::CD
-g;:l\oo-.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
a
n
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
U
Z
è
Co
s
t
s
!
.
)
To
t
l

C
o
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
n
i
g
e

P
e
a
k
Oe
m
a
n
e
l
(
e
)

O
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
LI
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
!
W
h
)

(
$
I
k
W
h
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
(k
W
h
)
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Ut
l
i
t
y
C
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
(a
k
W
)

(
k
W
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
He
a
t
i
n
g

a
n
d

C
o
o
l
i
n
g
Ef
f
c
i
e
n
c
y
20
0
6
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
$1
7
,
4
4
4
$1
7
,
4
4
0
4
$4
8
8
.
2
1
1
$4
9
4
,
9
8
9
1,
5
9
5
0
18
4
$5
0
5
,
6
5
6
$5
1
2
,
4
3
3
1,
5
9
5
18
12
,
6
6
3
$3
1
4
,
6
4
1
$4
,
0
5
9
3,
5
9
6
,
1
5
0
41
1
7
$0
.
0
1
4
$l
l
0
2
1
43
.
7
6
0
$7
3
,
1
5
2
$1
0
7
.
8
1
0
1,
7
3
4
.
6
4
19
8
0
7
$0
.
0
0
7
$0
.
0
1
0
(1
3
)
17
8
,
5
1
4
$2
9
8
.
7
5
4
$5
3
9
.
8
7
7
6.
3
0
2
.
7
9
4
71
9
7
$0
.
0
8
$0
.
0
1
4
21
9
,
7
$
9
$5
5
7
,
6
4
6
$6
,
7
5
6
7,
2
0
7
,
4
3
9
82
3
$0
.
0
1
2
$0
.
0
1
5
45
4
,
6
1
6
$1
,
2
4
4
,
1
9
3
$1
,
7
8
0
,
5
0
1
18
,
8
4
1
,
0
2
9
2,
.
1
5
1
7
$0
.
1
1
$0
.
0
1
5
99
$6
,
6
8
7
$1
0
,
4
9
2
14
,
4
5
4
2
12
12
$0
.
5
1
$0
.
0
7
9
99
$6
,
6
8
7
$1
0
,
4
9
2
14
,
4
5
2
12
12
$0
.
0
5
1
$0
.
7
9
EN
E
R
G
Y

S
T
A
R
e
.

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
20
0
3
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
l
Wi
n
d
o
w

A
1
C

T
r
a
d
e
-
p
Pi
l
o
t
20
0
3
To
t
a
l
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t

f
r
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
s
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
d

b
y

i
p
e
t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
,
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

fo
r
a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
o

t
h
e

p
o
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

W
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
l
'
e

D
e
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
.
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

is

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
l
i
v
e
.
(1
3
)

E
n
e
r
g

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d

f
o
r

a
c
t
u
a
l

s
a
l
e
s

of

65
,
4
3
0

b
u
l
b
s

fr
o
m

3
5
.
0
0
8
,

w
i
t
h

m
e
a
s
u
r
e

l
i
f
e

r
e
v
i
s
e
d

t
o

7

f
r
o
m

9

y
e
a
r
s
.
'"tico CD O'~
~¿
lJ

c
:
Il
:
:

-
m
co
C
O
l
J
x
CD

Q
:

(
'

:
:
~~

n
i
g
a:
.
~
~
o:
l
J
6
'
o(
'
,
¡
.
.
õ:
ti=so '"~CD.,('o3'0ti::""o CD3ti::a.,(fe:CD s:
ti::tico CD3 CD::-
lJll
(0CD(jN
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-

Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k

M
e
a
s
u
r
e
De
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)

L
i
f
e
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
($
l
W
h
)

(
$
l
W
h
)
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
Pa
r
l
i
c
l
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
Ut
U
i
y
C
)
(d
o
t
J
a
r
s
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(a
k
W
)
(k
W
)
WA
a
e
-
D
20
0
3
20
8
$2
2
8
,
1
3
4
$4
8
3
,
3
6
9
0
20
0
26
9
$4
9
8
,
4
7
4
$8
5
9
,
4
8
2
1,
2
7
1
.
e
n
14
5
25
$0
.
0
2
9
$0
,
0
5
0
20
0
5
57
0
$1
,
4
0
2
,
4
8
7
$1
,
9
2
7
,
4
2
4
3,
1
7
9
,
3
1
1
36
3
25
$0
,
0
3
3
$0
.
4
5
(1
4
)
20
0
54
0
$1
.
4
5
5
.
3
7
3
$2
.
2
3
1
,
0
8
6
2,
9
5
8
.
0
2
4
33
8
25
$0
.
0
3
7
$0
,
0
5
6
20
0
7
39
7
$1
,
2
9
0
.
1
6
$1
,
7
5
4
,
1
9
1
3,
2
9
6
,
0
1
9
37
6
25
$0
.
0
2
9
$0
.
0
4
0
To
t
a
l
1,
9
8
4
$4
,
8
7
4
,
4
8
$7
.
2
5
5
,
5
5
2
10
,
7
0
s
.
3
1
1,
2
2
25
$0
-
3
4
$0
.
0
5
0
WA
a
u
-
R
20
0
3
29
$2
2
.
2
5
5
$4
2
,
3
3
5
10
2
,
6
4
3
12
25
$0
.
0
1
6
$0
.
0
3
1
20
0
17
$1
3
,
4
6
9
$2
5
,
4
5
2
28
,
4
3
6
3
25
$0
.
0
3
5
$0
.
0
6
7
20
0
5
28
$4
,
3
4
8
$5
9
,
4
4
3
94
,
2
7
9
11
25
$0
.
0
3
5
$0
.
0
4
7
(1
5
)
20
0
0
N/
A
Nl
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
20
0
7
11
$3
3
.
6
0
7
$4
,
6
1
3
42
,
1
0
8
5
25
$0
,
0
5
9
$0
.
0
7
9
T"
o
t
a
l
85
$1
1
0
,
7
6
6
$1
6
8
,
9
3
0
26
1
,
4
6
6
31
25
$0
.
3
1
$0
.
0
4
7
:i:J:Jc:!!~'0o;:Ng-.
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t

f
r
o
m
l
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

ar
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
I

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
.

w
h
I
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
n

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
a
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
è

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
i
t
u
r
e
f
o
r

a

p
r
g
r
a
m

f
r
o

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(E
I
)

A
v
e
r
a

D
e
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
.

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

wh
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
ì
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
p
o
n
s
e

I
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
,
(ì
4
)

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
u
r
c

C
o
s
t
s

r
e
t
a
t
e
d

i
n

2
0
0
5

t
o
i
n
c
I
U
d
e

f
e
d
e
r
a
l

f
u
n
d
i
n
g

a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
e
r
e

b
y

C
A
P

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
;

2
0
0
3

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

n
o
t

r
e
p
o
r
e
d

d
u
e

t
o
.

in
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

fu
e
l

t
y
p
e
s
,
(1
5
)

B
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g

i
n

2
0
0
5
.

B
P
A

f
u
n
d
s

w
e
r
e

n
o

l
o
n
g
e
r

a
p
p
l
i
e
d

10

C
A
P

a
g
n
c
y

p
a
y
m
e
n
t
s
,

S
P
A

e
x
p
e
n
s
e

I
n

s
u
b
s
e
u
e
n
t

y
e
a

i
s

~
è
e
e
d

l
n
t
h
e

r
e
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e

s
t
a
t
e

e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
,
~~
"t
C
Il
:
:

-
m
CO
C
O

"
t
x
CD

s
;
n
:
:
o
i

_
.
~8
.
n
i
g
;
0-

°
z
;=
Ö
b

~
o
n

~
.
.
CJ CD3ll:J 9-(ja:CD s:
ll:Jll(0 CD3 CD:J..õ:
ll:To lJ ~..('o3 ~:J-.
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
.."0
Q):;c:Ë
8..
Ql
i l Ie ¡:::~0 ~I-II'i .~;;:ij 1'i ~c (,~.a ¡¡:;0 "i ~z Õl-
e i'.::~II I.I'..~Ql
:E ..
£.:i:~c
II ri
0-S :e
i!
Ql ~II a.i:~a.l!.ccri ~1 Ql l -5~fI
"i :i
¡::eic!c .~.c w
íiW 1!e:i ..
=
Õ
.J ~
~Il
()l û .~I-l'~l ~"'
Âl 1!Q)!t
:2 ~1:-.
L.
..
~
~I
~N II M "l ~~pj ~8 3 B S 0 0 0 0ggòg0gggg....
,..'C "...C'M (l (0 ~0 ..N N N èS 10 ~0 0 0 0 0 0cici~ci 0 ci ci g ~th EI W ....EI
10 ll ~0 0 N N N NNN............
~~~;¡..M "l CD
~ ~ ~
;;(l 0....10 (l IIMi.iNNN..A
l(á CD..A(l CIcôi...0 0 ..;;;¡ti
l(10 T"(l co cocoIX,.ai ai ø)..;i m~..
f. ~ Ii
ro 8 -
~ N !
'" ~a. ~
j~oii
~~
.."l lß 2 ~!ro
$..~~"'N io N 0~~,.ò(l ......i-co.0N~
~(l 0 0 ..~i-0 ~i-(0
eõ M M ai
it£1 (f (0
fg£1 ~..4f
T'
¡g 8 ~~Nco 0 0 ~eõ ~..aiN(l to !.....M C'ti ti ....
0 N 0 N t!....N
Q)E11If
Q);5iø
~
!!:.mE.i,g ~i :;
~é 'Q
en 'iø.D gB'i:0
en B ,!!i::i II
!
.:øilii l'Q:i :i
~i:c:11 !!m (/(/li m "2c:ei~'"il
51lEøii.'QE!e ::
'Q oi 0
i:~~~'"
"2 gi:iI''õli
8-
m g~i:il
;§e ie ~::Õ00:'t ::'QII'Q ~i:il!i¡11 0:'Q 'S:E i:oS l õ -P l1!E c .§J to !!'8.
ll
J2 'l E.5 e ::ti ll oi g
~l ci :5 :~'tI-::E
f
,!l
..f1 Š ~g ã(.
~
I'E 13Q:1:!!::
E ll oi 'Q
g !æ ~é !!0 ~.5 ii ::.I 11 0::e .s ...iciri.s æ
L
E.5 ..!!!!
l!~(.eQ:~i:
g 11 cie~i:011
~Ie 4)i:li¡¡ci 'Qi:a-~lD eõ i0l!¡i:13 :.
J
~,,.5 .9 eiøIE to ~'"~l.a Ql I w;:. :.0 ,!/iir!=æ i;::.!lIIi:
"2i;il .!8 ~8 mtoE§~II
51¡S!fI 'Q!!If ~::
¡¡0
i .f e i .x,g g 5 Q)l ii:
1: ..19 19
a.
~l! i:4'4i'õl!0 l:r'e ¡~l-E
Q)Q)l!E0FF::z a. l!'"ø
.. e.S:E ~ £Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 72 of 80
r-oo
~ooN
8c:ro
Ë
.g
æ.
"0c:
CO
~
55
~::
~
"-
~
..
.!Si:c:i
.î
iig
CD
~
Annual Report 2007
8 ~ i.~ .&
~ i ::~ f. ~
.. 0 ..
~ ~ l 8 8 ~ ~ lN N N ,~ Fo
~a.
Æ
!!
~
~
(;
!wmE.5 !!lëai a.
Page 63
"'Ql
(0 CD ~
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

an
d

Pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
To
t
a
l

Co
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k
Oe
m
a
n
e
l
(
l
l
)

O
e
a
n
e
l
(
f
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
(S
l
W
h
)

(
$
I
k
W
h
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
Pa
r
t
l
c
i
p
a
n
t
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Ut
i
l
l
~
C
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
W
)

(
k
W
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
(d
o
l
a
r
s
)
Ea
s
y

U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
$3
1
,
8
1
9
$7
1
1
,
4
9
4
$7
4
3
,
3
1
3
$3
1
,
8
1
9
$1
,
8
8
2
,
0
3
5
$1
,
9
1
3
,
8
5
4
59
2
59
2
78
0
12
$0
.
1
5
$0
,
0
4
0
78
0
12
$0
.
1
5
$0
.
0
4
0
5,
1
8
3
,
6
4
0
5,
1
8
3
,
6
4
10
4
10
4
Or
e
g
o
n

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Au
d
i
t

(
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

8
2
)
20
0
3
20
0
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
21 7 7 6 8 49
$4
,
0
0
0
$5
,
4
5
0
$5
,
4
5
0
$1
.
9
8
1
$7
,
4
3
1
$1
,
9
8
1
$1
1
,
4
3
1
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o
m

l
P
G
'
s

2
.
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

lo
s
s
e
s
,
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
C
i
p
a
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
l
i
c
h

m
a
y

re
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

co
s
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o
ì
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
s

O
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
r
a
m

f
r
o

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
l
o
l
e
,
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
y

1
8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
o
n
,
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
l
t
m

p
r
o
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

I
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(1
6
)

T
h
i
s

i
s
'

a
n

O
r
e
o
n

s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
.

T
h
e

co
m
p
a
n
y

d
o
e
s

n
o
t

m
o
n
i
t
o
r

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
i
o
n

o
f

a
u
d
i
t

r
e
c
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

t
h
u
s

d
o
e
s

n
o
t

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

f
o
r

t
h
i
s
pr
o
g
r
a
m
,

A
u
d
i
t

ex
p
e
n
s
e

n
o
t

i
n
v
o
l
v
i
n
g

o
u
t
s
i
d
e

c
o
n
t
r
a
c
o
r

s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s

a
r
e

b
o
o
k
e
d

t
o

g
e
n
e
r
a
l

c
U
$
t
o
m
e
r

s
e
r
v
,

S
i
x

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

s
e
r
i
c
e

a
u
d
i
t

w
e
r
e

c
o
p
l
e
t
e
d

i
n

2
0
0
6
,
5'
::c:~;;CD
"8;:Noo-.
~~
"0

c
:
Q)

:
:

-

m
(Q
(
Q
"
O
x
(1

g
:

(
"

:
:
~
g

i
T

§
:
..

0
.

i

.
.
O.

°
z
..
-
0
)
0
CX
"
l
o
'
0(
"

"
'

.
.
(1
6
)
o CD3Ql::a.,(fei CD :¡Ql::Ql
(0 CD3 CD::..ã:Ql::o "'~..()o3i:Ql::-.
:i:J:JC!l::CD
'0o;:Noo..
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

Pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
s
)
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
To
t
a
J
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
I
W
h
)

(
$
l
k
W
h
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
,
y
(k
W
h
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
Pa
r
t
l
c
l
p
a
n
t
(
b
)
(N
u
m
o
o
r
)
Ut
l
l
t
y
(
Ç
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
f
Y
e
a
r
(a
k
L
t

(
k
L
t
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Or
e
g
o
n

S
o
h
o
o
l

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y
20
0
5
20
0
To
t
a
l
0
S8
6
$S
I)
$2
4
,
3
7
9
$8
9
,
7
7
1
22
3
,
3
6
8
25
12
$0
,
0
1
2
$0
.
0
4
4
6
$2
4
,
4
6
5
$8
9
,
8
5
8
22
3
,
3
6
8
2S
12
$0
.
0
1
2
$0
,
0
4
4
(1
1
)
Cu
s
t
o
m

E
f
f
n
c
y
20
0
3
20
0
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
$1
,
3
0
3
$1
,
3
0
3
0
1
$1
1
2
,
3
1
1
$1
3
3
.
,
4
4
1
21
1
,
2
9
5
24
12
$0
,
0
5
8
$0
,
0
6
9
(1
8
)
24
$1
,
1
2
8
,
0
7
6
$3
,
6
5
3
,
1
5
2
12
,
0
1
6
,
6
7
8
1,
3
7
2
12
$0
,
0
1
0
$0
.
3
3
40
$1
,
6
2
5
,
2
1
6
$4
.
2
7
3
,
8
8
5
19
,
2
1
1
.
6
0
5
2.
1
9
3
12
$0
.
0
0
9
$0
,
0
2
4
49
$3
,
1
6
1
.
8
6
6
$7
.
0
1
2
,
6
8
6
29
,
7
8
9
,
3
0
4
3,
4
0
1
3,
6
2
2
12
$0
.
0
1
2
$0
,
0
2
6
11
4
$6
,
0
2
8
,
7
7
1
$1
5
,
0
7
4
,
4
6
7
61
,
2
2
8
,
8
8
2
6,
9
9
0
3,
6
2
2
12
$0
-
1
1
$0
.
0
2
1
(8
)

N
O
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
i
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t

f
r
O
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
r
r
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
,
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
t
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(ç
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
s
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
o

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
,
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
y

J

8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
,

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o

d
e
m
a
n
d

re
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
l
v
e
,
(1
7
)

E
n
e
r
g
y

i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s

o
f

$
,
6
7
4

w
e
r
e

p
a
í
d
f
o
r

t
h
i
s

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

u
n
d
e
r

t
h
e

E
a
s
y

U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
"
(1
&
)

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y

r
e
p
o
r
e
d

e
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

è
n
e
r
g
y

I
n
c
l
u
d
e
d

a
c
r
u
e
d

a
m
o
u
n
t
s
,

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

h
e
r
e

t
o

a
l
i
g
n

w
i
t
h

a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g

r
e
c
o
d
s
,
"'Dl
co CD 0)()
~~
II

i
:
tI
:
:

-
m
CO
C
O

l
l
x
CD

2
:

(
'

:
:
-;

8

m

2
:
..

0
.

i

.
.
s.
-
-
g
~
OJ

"'
6
.
0(
'

.
¡

.
.
ã:Dl::o "'~CD..()o3'0 Dl:J-.o CD3Dl
:Ja.ien õ:CD ~Dl
:J Dl
co CD3 CD:J-
-0Q)
(C(I 0)0)
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
l
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
)
To
t
a
'
i
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t

R
l
$
o
u
r
c
e
(!
!
W
h
)

(
$
I

kW
h
)
Pe
a
k
De
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
(d
o
l
l
(
f
f
'
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
(k
\
t
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
Ut
I
i
t
c
)
(d
o
f
J
a
r
s
)
(a
k
\
t
Ir
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

E
f
f
c
i
n
c
y
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
20
0
3
2
$4
1
,
0
8
9
$5
4
,
6
0
9
36
,
7
9
2
18
15
$0
.
1
0
6
$0
.
1
4
1
(1
9
)
20
0
33
$1
2
0
.
8
0
8
$4
2
,
9
7
8
80
2
.
8
1
2
44
9
15
$0
.
0
1
4
$0
.
0
4
(2
0
)
20
0
5
38
$1
5
0
.
5
7
7
$6
5
7
,
4
6
0
1.
0
1
2
,
8
8
3
40
1
15
$0
.
0
1
4
$0
.
0
6
2
20
0
6
55
9
$2
,
7
7
9
,
6
2
0
$8
,
5
1
4
,
2
3
1
16
.
9
8
6
,
0
0
8
1,
3
9
5.
1
0
0
8
$0
.
0
2
4
$0
.
0
7
3
(2
1
)
20
0
7
81
6
$2
.
0
0
1
,
9
6
1
$8
,
.
6
9
4
,
7
7
2
12
.
3
0
4
,
0
1
3
1,
4
0
5
3,
0
1
8
$0
.
0
2
4
$0
.
1
0
3
To
t
l
1,
4
4
$5
,
0
9
4
,
0
5
5
$1
8
,
3
2
4
,
0
5
0
31
,
1
4
2
,
5
6
8
3,
3
4
9,
3
1
6
8
$0
.
0
2
4
$U
8
6
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g

O
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
Tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
20
0
3
71
$4
8
,
8
5
3
$4
8
.
5
3
1,
8
2
5
,
0
0
0
20
8
20
0
26
$4
3
,
6
9
$4
3
,
9
6
9
65
0
,
0
0
74
20
0
5
7
$1
,
1
5
0
$4
,
4
8
0
43
4
,
1
6
7
50
To
t
l
10
4
$9
4
,
5
7
2
$9
7
,
3
0
2
2,
9
0
9
,
1
6
7
33
2
$0
.
0
0
6
$0
.
0
1
4
$0
.
0
0
1
$0
.
0
1
(2
2
)
$0
.
0
6
$0
.
0
1
4
$0
.
0
0
2
$0
.
0
7
5 5 5 5
):::::c:~~'8;:Noo..
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l

l
e
v
e
t
l
l
e
d

c
o
t
s

a
t
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

I
n
p
u
t

f
r
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
$
O
u
r
c
e
p
i
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

lo
s
s
e
s
,
(b
)

P
a
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o

e
n
e
g
y

e
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
c
l
.

R
$
&
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
.

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
s
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

fO
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
r
i
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

cu
s
t
o
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
e

D
e
a
r
d
"

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
.
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
.

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
r
i
g

l
r
r
ì
g
a
t
i
o
n

c
l
e
m
a
n
d

!
'
u
c
t
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
,

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(1
9
)

R
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

fr

$
1
1
.
1
9
0
.
(2
0
)

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y

r
e
p
o
r
t

e
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

e
n
e
r
g
y

i
n
e
l
l
J

8
C
e
d

a
m
o
u
n
t
,

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

h
e
r
e

t
o

a
l
i
g
n

wi
h

a
i
:
e
o
u
n
t
i
n
g

r
e
r
d
s
.
(2
1
)

M
e
a
s
u
r
e

l
i
f

i
s

w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d

l
i
f
e

(
b
a
s
e
(
l
(
)

e
n
g
y

s
a
v
i
n
g
s
)

o
f

c
u
s
t
o
m

o
p
t
i
o
n

(
1
5

y
e
a
r
s
)

a
n
d

m
e
n
u

o
p
t
o
n
s

(
5

y
e
a
r
s
)
.
(2
2
)

O
r
i
g
n
a
l
l
y

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

e
x
p
e
n
S
e
a
n
d
e
n
e
r
g
y

i
r
i
u
c

a
c

a
m
o
u
o
t
s
;

2
0
0
3

r
e
a
t
e
d

f
r
o

$3
6
,
0
8
4
,

2
0
0
4

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r
o
m

$
4
,
8
5
3
,
;i ¿
'U

c
:
Dl

:
:

-

m
CO
C
O

'
U
x
(l

2
:

(
)
:
:
~8
.

~
~
O.

°
z
-.
_
c
o
o
oo
'
U
o
'
°
(
)
.
¡
.
.
o(I3 Q)::a.,(fa:
(I š:Q)::Q)
(C(I3(I::-a:Q)::o -0 ~-.()o3 ~::
'c
);:i:ic:~::CD
'8;:Noo-.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

Pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
To
t
l

C
o
s
t
s
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
l
z
e
d
Co
s
(
a
l
e:Ql::o "'~..()o3"0 Ql:io.
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
l

D
e
l
l
a
n
d
(
f
l
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
W
)

(
k
W
)
Pa
r
t
c
l
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Ut
l
l
l
t
(
C
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
o
n
In
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
$3
,
4
9
7
$4
,
6
6
3
$2
6
,
8
2
3
$3
4
,
9
8
3
$3
,
4
9
7
$4
,
6
6
3
$2
6
,
8
2
3
$3
,
9
8
3
o
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
n

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y
In
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
20
0
5
20
0
To
t
a
l
$2
1
,
5
5
2
$2
4
,
3
0
6
$4
,
8
5
8
$4
3
,
9
6
9
$2
4
,
3
0
6
$6
8
,
2
7
5
o
DS
M

D
i
r
e
c
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Ov
e
r
h
e
a
d
20
0
7
To
t
l
$5
6
,
9
0
9
$5
6
,
9
0
9
o
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
Y

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
I
W
h
)

(
$
I
W
h
)
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

lo
s
e
s
,
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

ef
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t
a
n
n
l
.
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
E
l
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
l

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M
p
r
o
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
r
a
m

f
r
o

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

i
i
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

it
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

/
8
.
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
t
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
"'Ql
(Q CD 0)-.
~~
'"

c
:
~~

'
i
~
(l

2
:

(
'

:
T
;:

8

r
\

1
2
..

a
.

I

,
.
Q.
:
-

g

i
š
CD

"
'

b
.
0(
'
"
"
'
'
oCD3Ql:ia.iena:CD s:Ql:i Ql
(Q CD3 CD:i-
"'i:
(Q CD 0)CO
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
o CD3i:::a.i(/a:CD~i:::i:
(Q CD3CD::-
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
Pa
r
t
l
c
l
p
a
n
b
(
D
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Ut
l
l
i
t
y
(
C
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Re
s
.
C
l
u
r
e
.
C
d
)
(d
o
J
l
a
n
;
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
l

U
t
i
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
/
W
h
)

(
$
/
W
h
)
Ot
e
r

c
a
R
D

a
n
d

C
R
C
BP
A
(a
k
\
1

(
k
\
l
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
o
$6
7
.
0
1
2
$1
0
8
,
1
9
1
$1
0
1
,
1
7
7
$1
2
4
,
9
5
6
$3
1
.
6
4
5
$4
2
,
9
8
1
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
In
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
20
0
5
20
0
To
t
a
l
o
$7
,
4
9
8
$5
6
,
7
2
7
$$
4
,
2
2
5
$6
1
,
0
1
2
$1
0
8
,
1
9
1
$1
0
1
,
1
n
$1
2
4
,
9
5
6
$3
1
.
6
4
5
$4
3
2
,
9
8
1
$7
,
4
9
8
$5
6
,
7
2
7
$6
4
,
2
5
5
(i
l
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l

l
e
v
e
l
i
i
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
i
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
.
(D
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

en
e
r
g
y

e
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
.
r
e

i
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
U
b
$
c
n
b
e
r
s
,

wh
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
o
i
p
a
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(0
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

fo
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
o

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

à

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

'
"

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

1
8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f
k
W

f
r
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
,
):::::c~::CD
"C g.Noo..
~¿
"
c
:
~.
5
ï
j
~
(l

!
2
(
"
:
:
:j
§
.
n
i
~
o.

°
z
;;
;
6
~
O(
"
,
¡
.
.
ã:i:::o "'~CD..("o3"Ci:::~
5'::c:9l::CD
"Co;:Noo"'
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-

Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
'
l

L
e
V
e
l
l
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
l
i
)
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
l

U
t
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
I
k
W
h
)

(
$
/
W
h
)
Pe
a
k

M
e
a
s
u
r
e
De
m
a
n
d
(
f
)

L
i
(k
W
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
Ut
i
l
l
t
y
(
e
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
(
d
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
)
Pa
r
t
l
c
l
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Pr
o
r
a
l
Y
e
a
r
(a
k
W
)
Lo
c
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

E
f
f
i
e
n
c
y
Fu
n
d
s
20
0
20
0
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
l
56
$5
,
1
0
0
$5
,
1
0
0
(2
3
)
0
$2
3
,
4
4
9
$2
3
,
4
4
9
.2
$1
4
.
8
9
6
$2
6
.
7
5
6
78
,
0
0
0
9
10
$0
,
0
2
4
$0
,
0
4
2
48
0
$3
A
S
9
$3
.
4
5
9
19
,
0
2
7
.2
7
$0
,
0
0
9
$0
.
0
0
9
(2
4
)
$7
,
5
2
0
$7
,
5
2
0
9,
0
0
0
1
7
$0
.
1
3
5
$0
.
1
3
5
53
9
$5
4
,
4
2
4
$6
6
,
2
8
4
10
6
,
0
2
7
12
9
$0
.
0
6
6
$0
.
0
8
1
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l

l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
I
a
l

I
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o
m

I
.
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

I
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

lo
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
y

e
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
L
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

r
e
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
r
i
b
e
r
s
.

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

sa
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

b
y

¡
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

Re
s
ö
u
r
c
e

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
o

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

vi
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

wh
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
a
n
d

.
.

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
.

e
x
c
l
u
d
n
g

i
r
n
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
,

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

ad
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(2
3
)

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
i
o
n

I
n
i
t
a
t
i
v
e

c
o
s
t
s

w
e
r
e

a
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
d

a
m
o
n
g

a
l
l

r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

f
o

2
0
0
7
.
(2
4
)

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

d
i
r
e
c
t

p
r
o
r
a
m

c
o
s
t

o
n
l
y

(
$
1
,
0
0
8
)

a
S
$
O
i
a
e
d

w
i
t
h

s
p
e
i
a
l

C
F
t

t
r
e
s
h
o
w

d
i
s
t
r
I
b
u
t
i
o
n
.
-0 Ql
(Q CD 0)co
~¿
"0

c
:
Q)
:
l
-
m
CO
C
O

"O
x
CD

2
:
(
"
:
:
o
i

_
.
~8
.
n
i
g
;
o.

0

z
;;
'
5
6
9
o(
"
~
.
.
õ:Ql':o -0o ~..()o3"CQl::-.o CD3Ql::0.i(Jõ:
CD š:Ql::Ql
(Q CD3 CD::-
"U Dl
(0 CD--o
o CD3Dl::a.,(ja:CD š:Dl::Dl
(0 CD3 CD::-
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

an
d

Pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
U
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e
De
a
n
d
(
e
)
Pe
a
k
De
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
!
W
h
)

(
$
!
W
h
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
Pa
r
t
l
c
l
p
a
n
t
(
O
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Re
a
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Ut
l
l
t
y
(
C
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
$
)
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
(a
k
W
)
(k
W
)
NE
E
A
20
0
3
20
0
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
1
To
t
a
l

0
$1
.
2
9
2
,
1
4
8
$1
,
2
9
2
,
7
4
8
12
.
0
5
0
,
1
5
1
1,
3
1
6
$1
,
2
5
6
.
6
1
1
$1
,
.
2
5
6
.
1
1
13
,
5
4
5
,
8
9
1,
5
4
6
$4
7
6
.
8
9
1
$4
7
6
,
8
9
1
16
,
2
9
7
,
2
3
5
1.
8
6
0
(2
5
)
$9
3
0
,
4
5
5
$9
3
0
,
4
5
5
22
.
,
3
3
7
,
4
7
1
2,
5
5
0
(2
6
)
$8
9
3
,
3
4
0
$8
9
3
,
3
4
0
28
,
6
0
1
,
1
0
3,
2
6
5
(2
6
)
$4
,
8
5
0
,
0
4
4
$4
,
8
5
0
,
0
4
92
,
8
3
2
,
1
7
4
10
,
5
9
7
$2
,
5
6
6
,
2
2
9
$3
,
1
1
9
,
6
0
9
18
,
7
1
2
,
9
1
9
2,
1
3
2
18
9
$3
.
8
0
7
,
6
8
8
$4
,
6
8
8
,
6
3
7
19
,
4
1
9
,
6
0
5
2,
1
2
5
6,
5
3
6
$6
,
5
2
3
,
3
4
$9
,
3
5
8
,
6
2
0
37
,
8
5
3
,
0
4
4,
2
0
5
44
,
0
3
4
$1
1
,
1
7
4
,
1
8
1
$1
9
,
7
6
1
,
6
3
3
70
,
1
6
5
,
8
2
5
8,
0
7
8
43
,
7
9
0
$1
4
,
8
9
6
,
8
1
6
$2
5
,
9
3
8
,
5
5
0
91
,
1
4
3
,
7
6
1
10
,
4
0
57
,
0
7
2
$3
8
,
9
6
8
,
2
6
3
$6
2
,
8
6
7
,
0
4
9
23
7
,
8
9
6
,
1
5
6
27
,
1
5
7
15
1
.
,
6
2
1
20
0
3

0
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
To
t
a
l

D
l
r
ø
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

0
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l

l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
E

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
l
n
a
o
o
l
l
a
l

i
n
p
u
l
$
f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
O
d
è
~
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
,
(0
)

P
a
r
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
L
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t

a
n
n
L
l
a
I

s
u
b
s
c
r
b
e
r
s
.

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
E
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

S
a
m
e
pa
.
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(i
:
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

b
y

I
P
C
t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
L
l
r
c

c
o
s
t

I
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
e
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o

a

p
r
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

It
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
a
n
d
"

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
.

7
6
0

an
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
E
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
o
n

is

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

l
'
p
o
n
$
e

i
$

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(2
5
)

E
n
e
r
g
y

i
s

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r
o
m

2
0
0
5

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

o
f

20
,
0
5
3
,
7
5
6

k
W
h
,
(2
6
)

En
e
r
g
y

i
s

a

p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
a:Dl;;o "U ~..
):::::c~:;CD
"8::Noo--
()o3 -g::o.
¡¡-(o
"O
c
~.
s

=
¡

ç
¡
C1

2
:

(
"
:
:
~§
.

r
t
~
0-

°
z
__
0
0
0
00
"
0
0
'
o(
"
.
¡
.
.
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
t:~~
."ii e ;¡:i :i.õ 0,!:l-ll ~G)il ãì '-""E:0
.3 Il ii
!Q)ii i =i:(,~1:"ë ;;:i G)0 IIZl~eCo!
ìff-~E::J!.sIIQ)(,I':J ~jl~
.,tisQ)G)l .0.:"~.1:i:
BI'I'GlIVE~,§Q.:i
i!II01!'t::.!Õ c:..s I:II r "~col:i:'"ljCI'"'c:II j~~l ,!~..-"0 :i '"().s E::~l!c "i ::~æ+:e'~ec::11 CoClDc:~8 i:c ~-11oiIo15 I:..-
~8-"'~0 ::S 0 0:0 '"'tl'1 ~~I:e
l
I'tl i:i 1š0ti=~c:0 ..C\~ii :5 s'"8 (,
~llc~0 ~N -e :g I ~~~..NcoÛw(D ..(l ......fI !9EI-l'l5 1.(l Qi 1.to ~~;:...,
q5 q5 r-oi iò ¡.,~ro t (,
~
..l ~to .,I'(;(l lÐ ;:it ..!!
.g li ;;;;..I'0 to ~EliliNl'vi ..!!....0 ....g()0 tl (,
Q.l .i
-0 .:2?Co 11CIl1:.s '"ro i:!l E
()!l!ø :2 ~11 ~C ~I:
()1:o¡Co
I'§~0.Q.I:X i ,!l .W ('8 io 8 to ..¡I/l g II l2?8 8 8 ;:8 11~;:igNNNNNNNNNN;~-",(J
lü ~!ci .s ~I:~..õ OI
co 0 .e E(,()'0
~::I:'")0 II I:1l eib~;:'ä S (,i ji II..ë C..i €I'
:!
Ql ~1l CoÒtsI:'õM:E ï~:¡f ::!j 0 '¡iëen~/i z D.C c:
CD ~ê:Q.Q.
Q..c
¡'tm0c:
.re
jj 01
0 ~.s 8.~
co ~øI'"0
l
c:I'i"l E;;,g(,~.~
~§'ÒI''ü 'õ 0
~i:'r::i ~Gl
ë Co
'õ ::gi"i
.1
i:iI'0:E 'Ò-Q)e0".l ~Ê ..
rš
c:
lJ .5:Ql
8-¡¡E ..i::i .2eG)CD
~Co ..:i;i::
~
CD .!~l f5
:i
UI'E ~ñii!::i:"0 Gll~.iê !:5::~.çI'0 'D,5 "".s.2 ¡¡E ¡S e æ l!01(,æ e:è i:e!!"0 II Co ~~i.~Ql '"
"0 f'Q;1$
.~~as i c:-.
I::1l êl i~g G)1:
~l i:8.Iw!u .!!¡¡l'i "l ::.!!i:~.!8 I:
l '"11 tl
~
II E !"0 Ql~i c:¥li .:
~01 l lB "00:c:
S ~
0-m
0 l ti .!l-I-E .?
~~~§~'"en
t:£::s'!£~Exhibit No. 1
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 80 of 80
Annual Report 2007 Page 71
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-08-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
EXHIBIT NO.2
MICHAEL J. YOUNGBLOOD
ID
A
H
O

P
O
W
E
R

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
Fi
x
e
d

C
o
s
t

D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
IP
C
-
E
-
O
S
.
Q
S

S
e
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t

-

0
6
/
1
6
/
0
6
A
I
B
I
C
I
0
I
F
I
H
I
J
I
K
I
L
I
M
1
Cl
a
s
s

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
z
e
d

C
o
s
t
s
2"
'3
CO
S

D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

%

F
i
x
e
d

%

F
i
x
e
d

%

F
i
x
e
d
"T
Re
v
e
n
u
e

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

T
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n

G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n

T
o
t
a
l

D
i
s
t
.

A
n
d

C
u
s
t
.

T
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n

I
n
c
.

G
e
n
.

%

T
o
t
a
l
5"
Re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

C
o
s
t
s

C
o
s
t
s

C
o
s
t
s

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s
"6
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

2
5
0
,
7
8
4
,
4
8
4

9
8
,
0
8
1
,
5
2
0

2
2
,
7
7
4
,
2
9
9

3
1
,
2
7
5
,
4
9
5

1
5
2
,
1
3
1
,
3
1
4

3
9
,
1
%

9
.
1
%

1
2
,
5
%

6
0
.
7
%
7
Sm
a
l
l

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

1
5
,
0
1
1
,
2
5
6

7
,
2
5
9
,
6
6
1

1
,
1
5
9
,
6
7
9

1
,
6
5
0
,
7
0
5

1
0
,
0
7
0
,
0
4
6

4
8
.
4
%

7
,
7
%

1
1
.
0
%

6
7
,
1
%
T
La
r
g
e

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

1
2
9
,
4
2
4
,
8
7
9

2
5
,
8
4
3
,
0
6
4

1
3
,
8
3
6
,
0
1
2

1
9
,
7
9
6
,
5
2
7

5
9
,
4
7
5
,
6
0
3

1
8
.
8
%

1
0
,
8
%

1
5
.
5
%

4
5
,
1
%
9
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

6
3
,
9
1
7
,
3
1
3

7
,
2
7
1
,
6
7
7

6
,
2
0
3
,
0
5
6

9
,
2
2
1
,
4
4
4

2
2
,
6
9
6
,
1
7
7

1
1
.
4
%

9
,
7
%

1
4
.
4
%

3
5
,
5
%
10
Ir
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

8
8
,
6
9
6
,
3
6
9

2
5
,
3
1
4
,
9
1
6

1
0
,
1
1
1
,
9
9
9

1
5
,
9
3
5
,
4
6
0

5
1
,
3
6
2
,
3
7
5

2
8
.
5
%

1
1
.
4
%

1
8
,
0
%

5
7
,
9
%
lt
54
7
,
8
3
4
,
3
0
1

1
6
3
,
7
7
0
,
8
3
9

5
4
,
0
8
5
,
0
4
5

7
7
,
8
7
9
,
6
3
1

2
9
5
,
7
3
5
,
5
1
6
1213~14
Re
q
u
e
s
t
e
d

R
e
v
e
n
u
e

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t

w
i
t
h

F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
z
e
d

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s
1516
Al
l
o
w
e
d

T
o
t
a
l

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

%

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

%

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

%

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

%

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
s
17
Re
v
e
n
u
e

F
i
x
e
d

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d

f
r
o
m

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d

f
r
o
m

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d

f
r
o
m

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d

f
r
o
m

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d

f
r
o
m

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d

f
r
o
m

o
f

R
e
v
e
n
u
e
18
Re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t

~

F
i
x
e
d

C
h
a
r
g
e
s

D
e
m
a
n
d

C
h
a
r
g
e
s

E
n
e
r
g
y

C
h
a
r
g
e
s

F
i
x
e
d

C
h
a
r
g
e
s

D
e
m
a
n
d

C
h
a
r
g
e
s

E
n
e
r
g
y

C
h
a
r
g
e
s

R
e
g
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
19
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

2
6
6
,
7
2
8
,
0
2
9

1
5
2
,
1
3
1
,
3
1
4

1
7
,
4
9
1
,
0
8
4

-

1
3
4
,
6
4
0
,
2
3
0

1
1
,
5
%

0
.
0
%

8
8
.
5
%

5
7
.
0
%
20
Sm
a
l
l

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

1
6
,
0
3
9
,
9
3
7

1
0
,
0
7
0
,
0
4
6

1
,
4
9
2
,
3
8
2

-

8
,
5
7
7
,
6
6
4

1
4
.
8
%

0
.
0
%

8
5
.
2
%

6
2
,
8
%
2t
La
r
g
e

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

1
3
0
,
3
5
4
,
5
2
2

5
9
,
4
7
5
,
6
0
3

3
,
3
0
7
,
9
4
7

2
4
,
3
6
5
,
3
2
0

3
1
,
8
0
2
,
3
3
6

5
.
6
%

4
1
,
0
%

5
3
.
5
%

4
5
,
6
%
2i
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

6
3
,
5
5
1
,
4
5
7

2
2
,
6
9
6
,
1
7
7

2
7
5
,
2
2
4

1
6
,
9
6
7
,
7
9
9

5
,
4
5
3
,
1
5
4

1
.
2
%

7
4
,
8
%

2
4
.
0
%

3
5
,
7
%
23
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

7
1
,
7
8
7
,
6
7
2

5
1
,
3
6
2
,
3
7
5

1
,
2
5
2
,
5
0
1

1
4
,
2
3
3
,
4
2
1

3
5
,
8
7
6
,
4
5
3

2
.
4
%

2
7
,
7
%

6
9
,
8
%

7
1
.
5
%
"2
54
8
,
4
6
1
,
6
1
7

2
9
5
,
7
3
5
,
5
1
6

2
3
,
8
1
9
,
1
3
8

5
5
,
5
6
6
,
5
4
0

2
1
6
,
3
4
9
,
8
3
8
2526
~g::

-
m
"'c
o

"
'
)
(
&
~
n
~
(I

8
.

r
:
;
:
;;
-
-
~
i
:
-"
'
0
'
N(
"
'
¡
N
1
o
f

2
ID
A
H
O

P
O
W
E
R

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
Fix
e
d

Co
s
t

D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
IP
C
.
E
.
O
S
-
o
S

S
e
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
.

0
6
/
1
6
/
0
6
A
I
B
I
c
I
D
I
F
I
H
I
J
I
K
I
L
I
M
27
Cl
a
s
s

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t

R
a
t
e

D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
-
FC

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
FC

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
FC

L
o
s
s
FC

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
FC

L
o
s
s
Ba
s
e

R
a
t
e
fr
o
m

F
i
x
e
d
fr
o
m

D
e
m
a
n
d
Re
v
/
M
W
h
fr
o
m

E
n
e
r
g
y
Re
v
/
M
W
h
28
Ra
t
e

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
CO
S
Di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
To
t
a
l

F
i
x
e
d
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
!D
e
m
a
n
d
)
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
í5
29
Ra
t
e

01

26
6
,
7
2
8
,
0
2
9
25
0
,
7
8
4
,
4
8
4
16
,
0
2
2
,
8
8
7
15
2
,
1
3
1
,
3
1
4
17
,
4
9
1
,
0
8
4
-
13
4
,
6
4
0
,
2
3
0
$
29
.
8
9
3õ
Ra
t
e

0
7
16
,
0
3
9
,
9
3
7
15
,
0
1
1
,
2
5
6
1,0
3
6
,
6
2
5
10
,
0
7
0
,
0
4
6
1,
4
9
2
,
3
8
2
-
8,
5
7
7
,
6
6
4
$
39
,
2
4
31
Ra
t
e

0
9
8
11
8
,
6
4
3
,
2
5
9
11
7
,
8
3
1
,
3
0
6
82
2
,
6
2
2
54
,
5
6
9
,
0
0
4
3,
0
1
4
,
8
8
9
21
,
0
2
1
,
0
1
4
7.
2
5
30
,
5
3
3
,
1
0
1
$
10
,
5
4
~
Ra
t
e

0
9
P
,
T
11
,
7
1
1
,
2
6
3
11
,
5
9
3
,
5
7
3
11
7
,
7
4
0
4,
9
0
6
,
5
9
9
29
3
,
0
5
8
3,
3
4
4
,
3
0
6
10
,
1
5
1,
2
6
9
,
2
3
5
$
3,
8
5
33
Ra
t
e

1
9

8
,
P
,
T
63
,
5
5
1
,
4
5
7
63
,
9
1
7
,
3
1
3
(3
3
9
,
3
1
9
)
22
,
6
9
6
,
1
7
7
27
5
,
2
2
4
16
,
9
6
7
,
7
9
9
8.
2
5
5,
4
5
3
,
1
5
4
$
2,
6
5
34
Ra
t
e

2
4
8
71
,
7
8
7
,
6
7
2
88
,
6
9
6
,
3
6
9
(1
6
,
9
0
0
,
4
3
3
)
51
,
3
6
2
,
3
7
5
1,
2
5
2
,
5
0
1
14
,
2
3
3
,
4
2
1
9,
0
4
35
,
8
7
6
,
4
5
3
$
22
.
7
9
35it
Ar
e
a

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
93
8
,
9
5
6
41
0
,
2
9
1
52
8
,
6
6
5
93
8
,
9
5
6
(9
3
8
,
9
5
6
)
37
Un
-
M
t
r

G
e
n

8
v
c
87
3
,
3
8
7
77
3
,
1
4
9
10
0
,
2
3
8
87
3
,
3
8
7
(8
7
3
,
3
8
7
)
38
Mu
n
i

8
t
-
L
g
h
t
1,
9
5
4
,
0
4
3
1,
8
6
8
,
9
8
8
85
,
0
5
5
1,
9
5
4
,
0
4
3
(1
,
9
5
4
,
0
4
3
)
41
,
2
7
4
39
Tr
a
f
f
c

C
t
r
l
27
0
,
0
8
7
26
9
,
9
2
2
16
5
27
0
,
0
8
7
(2
7
0
,
0
8
7
)
80
40
IN
E
L
5,
1
6
2
,
1
6
2
5,
4
2
5
,
2
5
1
(2
6
3
,
0
8
9
)
5,
1
6
2
,
1
6
2
(5
,
1
6
2
,
1
6
2
)
(1
2
7
,
6
6
9
)
4T
8i
m
p
l
o
t
4,
6
4
5
,
1
9
0
4,
9
7
1
,
2
6
2
(3
2
6
,
0
7
2
)
4,
6
4
5
,
1
9
0
(4
,
6
4
5
,
1
9
0
)
(1
5
8
,
2
3
2
)
42
Mi
c
r
o
n
17
,
9
1
7
,
7
4
7
18
,
7
4
0
,
0
7
1
(8
2
2
,
3
2
4
)
17
,
9
1
7
,
7
4
7
(1
7
,
9
1
7
,
7
4
7
)
(3
9
9
,
0
4
8
)
43
To
t
a
l
58
0
,
2
2
3
,
1
8
9
58
0
,
2
9
3
,
2
3
5
70
,
0
4
6
44..
Ad
d
t
'
l

F
C

L
o
s
t
To
t
a
l

F
C

L
o
s
t
To
t
a
l

B
a
s
e
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Re
v
/
M
W
h
Re
v
/
M
W
h
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l

V
C
Ra
t
e

R
e
v
e
n
u
e
45
Ra
t
e

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
Fi
x
e
d

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
(E
n
e
r
g
y
)
(E
n
e
r
g
y
)
VC

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
MW
h
To
t
a
l

B
a
s
e

R
a
t
e
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r

A
d
j
.
Re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
~
Ra
t
e

0
1
7,
7
7
5
,
3
9
6
$
1.
7
3
$
31
.
6
2
98
,
6
5
3
,
1
6
9
8,
2
4
7
,
4
9
1
4,
5
0
3
,
8
6
5
$
55
,
3
6
(7
9
,
3
4
2
)

$

2
6
6
,
7
2
8
,
0
2
9
E.
Ra
t
e

0
7
50
3
,
0
4
1
$
2,
3
0
$
41
.
5
4
4,
9
4
1
,
2
1
0
53
3
,
5
8
4
21
8
,
6
0
6
$
66
,
5
8
(7
,
9
4
4
)

$
16
,
0
3
9
,
9
3
7
~
Ra
t
e

0
9
8
39
9
,
1
9
2
$
0.
1
4
$
10
,
6
8
63
,
2
6
2
,
3
0
2
42
3
,
4
3
0
2,
8
9
7
,
5
9
2
$
39
,
9
1
(1
0
,
6
6
9
)

$

1
1
8
,
6
4
3
,
2
5
9
~
Ra
t
e

0
9
P
,
T
57
,
1
3
6
$
0,
1
7
$
4.
0
3
6,
6
8
6
,
9
7
4
60
,
6
0
5
32
9
,
5
2
7
$
34
,
6
5
(5
0
)

$
11
,
7
1
1
,
2
6
3
~
Ra
t
e

1
9

8
,
P
,
T
(1
6
4
,
6
6
1
)

$
(0
,
0
8
)

$
2,
5
7
41
,
2
2
1
,
1
3
5
(1
7
4
,
6
5
8
)
2,
0
5
6
,
6
5
9
$
30
,
7
8
(2
6
,
3
7
)

$
63
,
5
5
1
,
4
5
7
~
Ra
t
e

2
4
8
(8
,
2
0
1
,
2
4
1
)

$
(5
,
2
1
)

$
17
,
5
8
37
,
3
3
3
,
9
9
4
(8
,
6
9
9
,
1
9
2
)
1,
5
7
4
,
1
0
0
$
44
,
8
2
(8
,
2
6
4
)

$
71
,
7
8
7
,
6
7
2
-¥
To
t
a
l

M
e
t
e
r
e
d

R
a
t
e
s

$

5
4
8
,
4
6
1
,
6
1
7
~
To
t
a
l

N
o
n
-
M
e
t
e
r
e
d

&

S
p
e
c
i
a
l
s

$
31
,
7
6
1
,
5
7
2
54
To
t
a
l

R
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d

R
e
v
e
n
u
e

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t

$

5
8
0
,
2
2
3
,
1
8
9
~
Fi
x
e
d

&

V
a
ñ
a
b
l
e

%

C
a
l
c
Fi
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
Va
r
i
a
b
l
e
I2
56
Ra
t
e

1
9

8
,
P
,
T
22
,
6
9
6
,
1
7
7
41
,
2
2
1
,
1
3
5
63
,
9
1
7
,
3
1
3
57
Ra
t
e

2
4
8
51
,
3
6
2
,
3
7
5
37
,
3
3
3
,
9
9
4
88
,
6
9
6
,
3
6
9
58
To
t
a
l
74
,
0
5
8
,
5
5
2
78
,
5
5
5
,
1
3
0
15
2
,
6
1
3
,
6
8
2
59
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
48
,
5
3
%
51
,
4
7
%
10
0
,
0
0
%
~I g='
-

m
\l
c
c

\
l

x
c2
~
c
;
~
(1

0

r
:
;
:
i'
F
l
o
z
o
-
C
f
o
¡;
t
l
~
N
2o
f
2
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-08-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
EXHIBIT NO.3
MICHAEL J. YOUNGBLOOD
ëi.~
CD ItEO en
E "' eng~000
o ~ C"_ enëi ~
Ern
QO~ "'
)- :g gZ iu Nc: · ..
a. ~ .E:E ~ gi
o o:e
o "C 0"" CD Q... II CDW IV 0:~ lX ~
;: 11-
o CD:5
a. 1â C
o 0: ~..w.... 00c: u. -C ~"i011o :iu.
co
.!l N_~NC It 0
CD .. QO"C e ~._ ~ enII N ItCD e C"
0: i;
~
CD
~(,
CD0:
1; ~o CDo E
"C .s~ II
ii c3
"C _~ 0.¡: ¡
o .Q
:5 E
:J :Jc: Z
_ CD..O)O..OOOOCDNOO..CDCOII ~NN"'C"NN"'"-C"NN"'",o CD "'. "'. "'. "'. "'. "'. "'. 1'. 1'. 1'. 1'. 1'. ~o ::CDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDO"C 8~~~~~~~~~~~~:g~ CD~EF.Hl~~~~~~~~~~aiii 0: ~
ëi.~
CD
E
Eoo
ëi
Ern
I' CD C" 0 00 N 10 CD 00 0) .. CDCDOOCDOIOCDOOOIO"'''CD
~I ~ ~ dÇ ~ ~ æ ;; ~ ~ ¡g t; $u.888gggggggg8óciooooooóooo~~~~~~~~~~~~
10 .. 10 C" I' 0 0 "' 00 .. 10 CD ItI' 0 0 CD CD 0) 00 CD 10 0) C" 0) N~OO N "' 0 00 CD 00 I' .. I' 0 0 QO.. Ñcõiñcõc0oc0-.iñ-.ocõiñCD .. N I' CD 00 10 C" "' CD 0 0 C" 0C N. ~ ... ~ ~ 10. e. ~ OC 10. ~ CD. ~
W N .. 0) CD 10 10 I' 00 I' CD I' 0 QOC'N~~~~~~~~T'N~N
0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
"' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "'01"'"' .,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,ONNNNNNNNNNNNu. ~~~~~~fßfßfß~~~
00 I' C" I' 00 I' 10 N 0 C" 10 e en- ..C""'001'00)C"0)C"C"01tII ~01'000)00)000)1'00"'C"
8 ~ cõ r- r- r- cõ r- cõ cõ r- r- r- cõ iñ"C oææææææææææææ~CD ~ ........................ Ñ)(""T'T'T'T'T'T'T'T'T'T'T"T'oqii "'~~~fß~fß~~fßfß~~..~
IV~C
CD"C
¡¡¡
~
I'N"'IOI'CDCDN"'IO....o)",o)OI'O)e..OOo)OOIOOOeNOOCDO)"'~æ~~~~~;;~;;~00000C!C!C!000000000000000~~~~~~~~fß~~~
o
WI~ONu. ~
OO......CD IOI'"'o) N 0)1'0
..0 C"CDOO"'C""'o)O OO..C"
0) o)"' No)l'N 000 C"C"..N~.. cô c0 m cõ"" r- cô c0 -. cô iñ iñ.. "' 00 CD C" C" .. CD I' NOON 0 CO
CD "'C""' C"IO "'C""'CD IONOQOC.............W.. "' N "'.. 0) 10 I' 0 0) 0)00 C"NI'NCD..OONCD"'o)C""'O1O"'''C'C'NC'C'C'NC'''1t ..
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 000) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)olN N N N N N N N N N N NOC"C"C"C"C"C"C"C"C"C"C"C"U. ~~~fß~~~~fßfßfß~
~~IV ~ .c:J"'(,,_~CDC.Ql;a,IVC~~~c:~";
(¡ .....Q .. ~ ~- E CD .. ..II E E
:JCD.Q CD CD-~CJQ..s::(,S:J:JCD(,OCDO..c:rnOzc..
¡;N~
enC"It.."'oo~
QO
QO
MenN~
r:
CON~
..NCO..C"oo~
N
QOirenC"~
CD(,Cf
~Õ
WoU.
"CC
IVooU.
ëi:JCCc:Exhibit NO.3
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngblood, IPC
Page 1 of 1
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-08-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
EXHIBIT NO.4
MICHAEL J. YOUNGBLOOD
A
B
C
0
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
1 P
o
w
e
r

C
o
s
t

A
d
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
2 A
D
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

I
h
r
u

M
a
r
c

2
0
AD
r
"
Ma
v
Ju
n
e
Ju
l
Au
o
u
s
t
Se
o
t
e
m
b
e
r
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
Ja
n
u
a
r
v
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
v
Ma
r
c
h
To
t
a
l
s
3 4
p
e
A

R
e
v
e
n
u
e
5
N
o
r
m
a
l
i
z
e
d
Sa
l
e
s
89
7
,
4
0
0
95
4
,
8
8
6
1,0
7
4
,
2
5
2
1,2
7
3
,
9
7
7
1,2
9
5
,
4
8
0
1,1
6
8
,
3
6
7
99
6
,
8
1
2
91
2
,
3
3
6
1,
0
2
1
,
0
5
6
1,0
9
6
,
4
0
1
1,0
3
2
,
6
6
3
97
1
,
5
3
3
12
,
6
9
5
,
1
6
3
6
"'
,

U
U
!
U
U
!
'2
.
5
0
7
f2
.
5
0
T
1.
8
8
8
1.
8
8
8
1.
8
8
8
1.
8
8
8
1.
8
8
8
1.8
8
8
1.8
8
8
1.8
8
8
1.8
8
8
1.8
8
8
7
R
¡
¡
i
i
í
ì
û
e
/
'
U
(2
,
2
4
9
;
1
8
1
.
0
0
)
(2
)
9
:
~
;
8
9
9
.
2
0
)
2,0
2
8
,
1
8
7
.
7
8
2,
4
0
5
,
2
6
8
.
5
8
2,
4
4
5
,
8
6
6
.
2
4
2,
2
0
5
,
8
7
6
.
9
0
1,8
8
1
,
9
8
1
.
0
6
1,
7
2
2
,
4
9
0
.
3
7
1,9
2
7
,
7
5
3
.
7
3
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
9,9
7
3
,
7
4
3
.
6
6
8
""
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
,
'
,
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
9
L
o
a
d

C
h
a
n
g
e

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
1 0

A
c
t
u
a
l

F
i
r
m

L
o
a
d

-

A
d
i
u
s
t
e
d
Mw
h
1,0
8
4
,
8
4
2
1,3
6
2
,
8
6
2
1,5
2
9
,
7
7
1
1,8
1
6
,
2
2
4
1,6
0
1
,
8
4
8
1,2
3
5
,
7
3
2
1,1
1
0
,
7
5
9
1,
1
7
1
,
4
3
3
1,
3
6
7
,
7
6
4
0
0
0
12
,
2
8
1
,
2
3
5
11

N
o
r
m
a
l
i
z
e
d

F
i
r
m

L
o
a
d
Mw
h
1,0
5
8
,
8
4
5
1,2
1
4
,
5
1
8
1,3
9
5
,
6
1
7
1,5
6
7
,
7
8
3
1,4
8
2
,
8
9
6
1,
1
8
5
,
5
9
4
1,0
8
0
,
8
6
8
1,
1
2
2
,
4
6
4
1,
2
7
4
,
1
0
8
1,2
6
5
,
0
9
1
1,0
9
2
,
6
4
5
1,0
7
8
,
7
2
3
14
,
8
1
9
,
1
5
2
12

L
o
a
d

C
h
a
n
o
e
Mw
h
25
,
9
9
7
14
8
,
3
4
4
13
4
,
1
5
4
24
8
,
4
4
1
11
8
,
9
5
2
50
,
1
3
8
29
,
8
9
1
48
,
9
6
9
93
,
6
5
6
(I

,
2
6
5
,
O
H
1

ì
(1
,
O
H
2
,
6
4
5
'
(1
,
0
7
8
.
7
2
:
.
\
)
12
.
5
3
7
9
1
;
13

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

A
d
u
s
t
m
e
n
t

(
t
w

2
9
.
4
1
'7
6
4
,
5
7
1
.
7
7
)
(4
,
3
6
2
.
7
9
7
.
0
4
)
(3
,
9
4
5
,
4
6
9
.
1
4

)
(7
.
3
0
6
,
6
4
9
.
8
1
)
(3
,
4
9
8
,
3
7
8
,
3
2
)
(1
,
4
7
4
,
5
5
8
.
5
8
j
(8
7
9
,
0
9
4
.
3
1
)
(1
,
4
4
0
,
1
7
8
.
2
9
)
(2
,
7
5
4
,
4
2
2
.
9
6
'
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
14 15

A
c
t
u
a
l

N
o
n
o
Q
F

p
e
A
16

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

A
d
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
$
(7
6
4
.
5
7
1
.
7
7
)
(4
,
3
6
2
.
7
9
7
.
0
4
)
(3
,
9
4
5
-
4
6
9
.
1
4
)
(7
,
,
3
0
6
,
6
4
9
.
8
1
)
(3
,
4
9
8
,
3
7
8
.
3
2
)
(1
,
4
7
4
,
5
5
8
.
5
8
'
)
(8
7
9
,
0
9
4
.
3
1

)
(1
,
4
4
0
,
1
7
8
.
2
9
)
(2
,
7
5
4
,
4
2
2
,
9
6
)
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
(2
6
,
4
2
6
,
1
2
0
.
2
2
)
17

W
a
t
e
r

L
e
a
s
e

P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
$
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0,0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
18

C
l
o
u
d

S
e
e
d

in
a

P
r
o
a
r
a
m
$
38
,
1
5
0
.
6
3
13
4
,
4
0
9
.
8
1
14
,
4
0
4
.
1
3
20
,
8
2
0
.
9
0
36
,
6
0
9
.
7
8
35
,
6
1
3
.
6
6
32
,
8
1
6
.
0
1
62
,
6
0
5
.
3
9
17
2
,
2
4
5
.
1
2
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
54
7
,
6
7
5
.
4
3
19

F
u
e
l

E
x
p
e
n
s
e
-
C
o
a
l
$
7,
0
5
4
,
8
1
6
.
3
1
6,
8
6
4
,
1
1
8
.
9
2
9,
9
9
3
,
7
0
4
.
3
9
10
,
0
7
0
,
1
5
4
.
1
8
10
,
9
2
3
,
8
6
8
.
4
9
10
,
0
4
4
,
2
8
7
.
3
3
10
,
3
3
5
,
3
0
5
.
8
2
10
,
2
6
6
,
5
8
2
.
1
8
10
,
0
0
8
,
6
0
4
.
7
6
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
85
,
5
6
1
,
4
4
2
.
3
8
20

D
a
n
s
k
i
n
w
G
a
s
$
21
8
,
0
7
5
.
9
0
86
,
1
6
0
.
7
6
31
7
,
4
9
9
.
2
5
1,
3
3
9
,
2
9
1
.
5
8
1,
1
8
2
,
4
6
3
.
2
8
10
7
,
9
9
8
.
5
9
32
7
,
8
7
4
.
9
8
65
,
8
2
8
.
7
0
72
,
1
7
6
.
3
9
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
3,7
1
7
,
3
6
9
.
4
3
21

B
e
n
n
e
t
t

M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
-
G
a
s
$
47
6
,
4
1
0
.
4
2
1,0
3
0
,
4
4
7
.
4
0
1,5
4
6
,
9
4
6
.
7
3,6
2
8
,
1
0
6
.
2
6
3,
9
1
3
,
6
1
3
.
7
5
1,
5
0
7
,
9
3
2
.
0
2
33
0
,
9
4
5
.
9
0
27
5
,
5
0
2
.
5
5
80
2
,
3
3
0
.
2
1
0,0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
13
,
5
1
2
,
2
3
5
.
2
8
22

N
o
n
w
F
i
r
m

P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
$
16
,
4
0
6
,
5
9
3
.
6
9
18
,
7
7
1
,
5
8
9
.
5
0
30
,
6
4
5
,
1
2
0
.
0
5
37
,
4
9
0
,
5
7
8
.
9
9
34
,
7
1
3
,
0
2
7
.
4
0
19
,
3
6
1
,
4
2
2
.
7
12
,
7
1
6
,
7
9
9
.
0
6
15
,
6
2
0
,
1
3
2
.
2
6
25
,
6
2
4
,
2
0
6
.
8
6
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
21
1
,
3
4
9
.
4
7
0
.
5
8
23

T

e
l
o
c
a
s
e
t

W
i
n
d

P
o
w
e
r

P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
3,5
4
0
.
2
2
73
7
,
8
9
2
.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
74
1
,
4
3
2
.
2
2
24

S
u
r
p
l
u
s

S
a
l
e
s
$
(1
1
,
7
1
)
9
,
1
:
\
4
.
0
2
'6
,
4
9
1
,
ü
J
1
.
4
T
'1
7
.
0
0
2
,
0
2
9
.
1
1

'
¡
i3
,
3
3
6
,
4
B
O
.
4
J
'
)
11
0
.
7
8
8
,
9
0
2
.
6
6
)
(1
4
,
1
:
1
:
1
.

13
(
1
.
f
3
H
)

11
:
.
\
,
1
0
8
.
7
0
8
.
(
9
)
(8
,
4
;
:
H
;
i
,
9
1
7
.
7
1
ì
(1
5
,
S
H
7
,
5
ß
2
.
5
3
ì
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
(1
0
e
,
2
7
7
,
ì
2
:
1
.
5
0
'
25

T
o
t
a
l

N
o
n
~
Q
F
$
11
,
6
4
0
,
3
4
1
.
1
6
16
,
0
3
2
,
8
9
7
.
8
8
21
,
5
6
9
,
3
7
6
.
3
4
36
,
9
0
5
,
8
2
1
.
6
7
36
,
4
8
2
,
3
0
1
.
7
2
15
,
4
9
,
5
5
8
.
9
1
9,
1
5
5
,
9
3
8
.
7
7
16
,
4
1
4
,
0
9
5
.
3
0
19
,
0
7
5
,
4
4
9
.
8
5
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
18
2
,
7
2
5
,
7
8
1
.
6
0
26 27

B
A
S
E
28

F
u
e
l

E
x
p
e
n
s
e
-
C
o
a
l
$
7,0
9
5
,
5
3
6
.
0
0
6,
7
8
8
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
6,3
4
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
8,7
1
4
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
8,7
2
0
,
3
0
8
.
0
0
8,4
4
8
,
9
0
8
.
0
0
8,7
2
6
,
4
0
8
.
0
0
8,4
4
2
,
4
0
8
.
0
0
8,7
2
6
,
6
0
8
.
0
0
8,4
5
3
,
5
0
8
.
0
0
7,
3
7
2
,
8
0
8
.
0
0
7,
2
8
2
,
4
0
8
.
0
0
95
,
1
1
1
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
29

D
a
n
s
k
i
n
~
G
a
s
$
26
4
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
27
6
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
27
5
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
27
9
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
28
0
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
26
4
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
27
2
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
26
4
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
27
3
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
27
2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
25
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
27
3
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
3,2
5
5
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
30

B
e
n
n
e
t
t

M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
w
G
a
s
$
32
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
25
7
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
40
6
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
25
3
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
25
6
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
20
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
22
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
6,
1
0
0
.
0
0
99
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
51
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
26
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
51
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
1,4
8
3
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
31

N
o
n
-
F
i
r
m

P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
$
26
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
58
6
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
2,
7
1
5
,
0
0
.
0
0
3,1
6
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
2,7
6
5
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
47
9
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
35
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
60
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
84
1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
38
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
84
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
72
8
0
0
.
0
0
11
,
7
6
4
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
32

C
l
o
u
d

S
e
e
d
i
n
a

E
x
o
e
n
s
e
$
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0,
0
0
16
7
,
4
2
3
.
0
0
16
7
,
4
2
3
.
0
0
16
7
,
4
2
3
.
0
0
16
7
,
4
2
3
.
0
0
16
7
,
4
2
3
.
0
0
16
7
,
4
2
3
.
0
0
1,0
0
4
,
5
3
8
.
0
0
33

C
l
o
u
d

S
e
e
d
i
n
'
o

B
e
n
e
f
i
$
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
(3
1
6
,
6
6
6
.
6
7
)
'3
1
6
,
6
6
6
.
6
5
)
34

S
u
r
p
l
u
s

S
a
l
e
s
$
'9
,
Z
I
4
,
O
O
O
.
O
O
'
l
6,7
9
2
.
9
0
0
.
m
)
'
(4
,
8
3
1
.
5
0
0
.
0
0
1
(2
,
5
4
2
2
0
0
.
0
0
i
(\,
6
0
1
.
0
0
.
0
0
)
(5
,
7
3
6
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
(5
,
O
'
l
,
2
0
(
)
,
O
O
)
(8
,
1
5
5
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
\
35

N
e
t

9
0
%

Ite
m
s

$
(1
,
8
1
4
,
ì
6
4
.
0
0
1,1
1
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
4,9
0
7
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
9,8
7
1
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
8,4
2
1
,
9
0
8
.
0
0
3,4
7
7
,
6
0
8
.
0
0
3,
8
9
5
,
6
4
.
3
3
7,7
4
7
,
0
6
4
.
3
3
6,3
4
7
,
4
6
4
.
3
3
3,
1
2
5
,
2
6
4
.
3
3
(1
8
4
,
7
3
5
.
6
7
j
(6
2
4
,
0
3
5
.
6
5
)
46
,
2
8
4
,
3
3
8
.
0
0
36 37
,
""
,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
13
,
4
5
5
,
1
0
5
.
1
6
14
,
9
1
8
,
8
9
7
.
8
8
16
,
6
6
1
,
6
7
6
,
3
4
27
,
0
3
4
,
4
2
1
.
6
7
28
,
0
6
0
,
3
9
3
.
7
2
11
,
9
7
1
,
9
5
0
.
9
1
5,2
6
0
,
4
7
4
,
4
4
8,6
6
7
,
0
3
0
.
9
7
12
,
7
2
7
,
9
8
5
.
5
2
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
13
8
,
7
5
7
,
9
3
6
.
6
1
38
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
39

S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
13
,
4
5
5
,
1
0
5
.
1
6
14
,
9
1
8
,
8
9
7
.
8
8
16
,
6
6
1
,
6
7
6
.
3
4
27
,
0
3
4
,
4
2
1
.
6
7
28
,
0
6
0
,
3
9
3
.
7
2
11
,
9
7
1
,
9
5
0
.
9
1
5,2
6
0
,
4
7
4
.
4
4
8,6
6
7
,
0
3
0
.
9
7
12
,
7
2
7
,
9
8
5
.
5
2
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
13
8
,
7
5
7
,
9
3
6
.
6
1
40 41

S
h
a
r
i
n
i

P
e
r
c
n
t
a
Q
8
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
90
.
0
%
42
Id
a
h
o

A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
43 44
No
n
-
Q
F

D
e
f
e
r
r
a
l
$
11
,
3
9
5
,
1
2
8
.
5
6
12
,
6
3
4
,
8
1
4
.
6
1
14
,
1
1
0
,
7
7
3
.
6
9
22
,
8
9
5
,
4
5
1
.
7
1
23
,
7
6
4
,
3
4
7
.
4
4
10
,
1
3
9
,
0
4
5
.
2
3
44
5
5
,
0
9
5
.
8
0
7,
3
4
0
,
1
0
8
.
5
3
10
,
7
7
9
,
3
3
0
.
9
4
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
11
7
,
5
1
4
,
0
9
6
.
5
1
45~
Ac
t
u
a
l

O
F

I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s

N
e
t

M
e
t
e
r
i
n
a
)
$
3,1
1
3
,
3
2
0
.
5
5
4,3
3
4
,
6
3
2
.
4
1
6,2
0
6
,
6
7
2
.
8
9
6,5
0
8
,
8
0
8
.
5
0
6,0
3
7
,
6
4
6
.
0
8
4,
7
2
9
,
0
9
1
.
5
3
3,0
6
9
,
8
9
3
.
8
6
2,
2
6
3
,
4
4
6
.
6
7
2,
6
0
3
,
2
1
6
.
2
4
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
38
,
8
6
6
,
7
2
6
.
7
3
.g
Ba
s
e

O
F
$
3,0
1
1
,
5
0
3
.
0
0
4,5
3
7
,
8
1
4
.
0
0
7,2
9
2
,
8
2
9
,
0
0
7,5
4
0
,
6
6
4
.
0
0
7,1
5
8
,
6
6
1
.
0
0
5,5
0
3
,
7
6
8
,
0
0
4,5
6
1
,
8
5
3
.
0
0
3,
2
3
9
,
5
9
3
.
0
0
3,4
8
3
,
8
6
3
.
0
0
3,0
3
6
,
4
1
0
.
0
0
2,9
5
7
,
5
9
5
.
0
0
2,3
0
7
,
6
0
4
.
0
0
54
,
6
3
2
,
1
5
7
.
0
0
~
10
1
,
8
1
7
.
5
5
(2
0
3
,
1
8
1
.
5
9
)
(1
,
0
8
6
,
1
5
6
.
1
1
j
('1
,
0
3
1
,
8
5
7
,
5
0
(1
,
1
2
1
,
0
1
4
.
9
2
)
(7
7
4
,
6
7
6
.
4
7
)
'1
,
4
9
U
)
S
9
.
1
4
ì
(9
7
6
,
1
4
6
.
3
3
)
(8
8
0
,
6
4
6
.
i
6
j
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
(7
,
4
6
3
.
B
2
1
.
2
I
)
49 50

S
h
a
r
l
n
a

P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
o
e
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
10
0
.
0
%
51

I
d
a
h
o

A
l
l
o
a
t
i
o
n
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
%
94
.
1
0
/
0
52 53

Q
F

D
e
f
e
r
r
a
l
$
95
,
8
1
0
.
3
1
í1
9
1
,
1
9
3
.
8
8
(1
,
0
2
2
,
0
7
2
.
9
0
97
0
.
9
7
7
.
9
1
)
(1
,
0
5
4
,
8
7
5
.
0
4
'
'7
2
8
.
9
7
0
.
t
:
o
$
)
(1
,
4
0
3
,
9
3
3
.
5
5
)
19
1
8
,
5
5
3
.
7
0
1
18
2
8
,
6
8
8
.
6
0
\
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
(7
,
0
2
3
.
4
5
5
.
8
3
'
54 55 56

T
o
t
a
l

D
e
f
e
r
r
a
l
$
13
,
7
4
0
,
7
2
0
.
6
7
14
,
8
3
7
,
5
1
9
.
9
3
11
,
0
6
0
,
5
1
3
.
0
1
19
,
5
1
9
,
2
0
5
.
2
2
20
,
2
6
3
,
6
0
6
.
1
6
7,
2
0
4
,
1
9
7
.
7
1,
1
6
9
,
1
8
1
.
1
9
4,6
9
9
,
0
6
4
.
6
8,0
2
2
,
8
8
8
.
6
1
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
10
0
,
5
1
6
,
8
9
7
.
0
2
~
..
_
-
-
,
-
~
-
-
~
.
~
~
-
_
.
~
~
--
--
_
.
-_
.
_
_
.
.
58 59

P
r
i
n
c
i

a
l

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
60 61
J'
0.0
0
13
,
7
4
0
,
7
2
0
.
6
7
28
,
5
7
8
,
2
4
0
.
6
0
39
,
6
3
8
,
7
5
3
.
6
1
59
,
1
5
7
,
9
5
8
.
8
3
79
,
4
2
1
,
5
6
4
.
9
9
86
,
6
2
5
,
7
6
2
.
7
6
87
,
7
9
4
,
9
4
3
.
9
5
92
,
4
9
4
,
0
0
8
.
4
1
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
62 63

A
m
o
u
n
t

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
$
13
,
7
4
0
,
7
2
0
.
6
7
14
,
8
3
7
,
5
1
9
.
9
3
11
,
0
6
0
,
5
1
3
.
0
1
19
,
5
1
9
,
2
0
5
.
2
2
20
,
2
6
3
,
6
0
6
.
1
6
7,2
0
4
,
1
9
7
.
7
7
1,
1
6
9
,
1
8
1
.
1
9
4,
6
9
9
,
0
6
4
.
4
6
8,0
2
2
,
8
8
8
.
6
1
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
10
0
,
5
1
6
,
8
9
7
.
0
2
64 65

E
n
d
i
n
a

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$
13
,
7
4
0
,
7
2
0
.
6
7
28
,
5
7
8
,
2
4
0
.
6
0
39
,
6
3
8
,
7
5
3
.
6
1
59
,
1
5
7
,
9
5
8
.
8
3
79
,
4
2
1
,
5
8
4
,
9
9
86
,
6
2
5
,
7
6
2
.
7
6
87
,
7
9
4
,
9
4
3
.
9
5
92
,
4
9
4
,
0
0
8
.
4
1
10
0
,
5
1
6
,
8
9
7
.
0
2
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
66 67

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
~69
0.
0
0
(3
.
3
1
.
\
)
57
,
2
5
1
.
7
4
17
6
,
3
2
2
.
8
6
34
0
,
1
5
0
.
1
8
58
6
,
6
4
0
.
5
3
91
7
,
5
7
5
.
7
2
1,2
7
8
,
4
0
3
.
1
7
1,6
4
4
,
2
2
9
.
8
4
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
70 71

M
o
n
t
h
l
v

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

R
a
t
e

*
*
5.0
%
5.
0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.
0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.
0
%
5.
0
%
5.
0
%
72 73

M
o
n
t
h
l
v

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

I
n
c
/
(
E
x
p
$
0.
0
0
57
,
2
5
3
.
0
0
11
9
,
0
7
6
.
0
0
16
5
,
1
6
1
.
4
7
24
6
,
4
9
1
.
5
0
33
0
,
9
2
3
.
1
9
36
0
,
9
4
0
.
6
8
36
5
,
8
1
2
.
2
7
38
5
,
3
9
1
.
7
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
2,0
3
1
,
0
4
9
.
8
1
74

P
r
i
o
r

M
o
n
t
h
'
s

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
$
3.:
H
J
)
2.1
2
14
.
8
1
l
)
(1
;
;
1
3
4
,
1
5
)
1.1
5
12
.
0
0
('1
1

~
~
,
2
3
14
.
4
0
19
.
8
6
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
1,4
0
B
.
4
1
i
75
To
t
a
l

C
u
r
r
e
n
t

M
o
n
t
h

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
$
(3
,
3
8
ì
57
,
2
5
5
.
1
2
11
9
,
0
7
1
.
1
2
16
3
,
8
2
7
.
3
2
24
6
,
4
9
0
.
3
5
33
0
,
9
3
5
.
1
9
36
0
,
8
2
7
.
4
5
36
5
,
8
2
6
.
6
7
38
5
,
4
1
1
.
5
6
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
2,0
2
9
,
6
4
1
.
4
0
76 77

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

A
c
c
r
u
e
d

t
o

d
a
t
e
$
:\
3
8
57
,
2
5
1
,
7
4
17
6
,
3
2
2
.
8
6
34
0
,
1
5
0
,
1
8
58
6
,
6
4
0
.
5
3
91
7
,
5
7
5
.
7
2
1,
2
7
8
,
4
0
3
.
1
7
1,6
4
4
,
2
2
9
.
8
4
2,0
2
9
,
6
4
1
.
4
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
78 19

B
a
l
a
n
c
e

i
n

A
l
l

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
$
13
,
7
4
0
,
7
1
7
.
2
9
28
,
6
3
5
,
4
9
2
.
3
4
39
,
8
1
5
,
0
7
6
.
4
7
59
,
4
9
8
,
1
0
9
.
0
1
80
,
0
0
8
,
2
0
5
.
5
2
87
,
5
4
3
,
3
3
8
.
4
8
89
,
0
7
3
,
3
4
7
.
1
2
94
,
1
3
8
,
2
3
8
.
2
5
10
2
,
5
4
6
,
5
3
8
.
4
2
0.
0
0
0.
0
0.
0
0
10
2
,
5
4
6
,
5
3
8
.
4
2
s:
"'

:
.
:
:

ç
r
~
g

n
2
:
CP
c
5

r
r
g
"'
O
'
°
Z
o
õ
'
t
f
o
~8
.
~
~
PC
A
A
B
C
0
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
1
P
o
w
e
r

C
o
s
t

A
d
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
2 A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7

t
h
r
u

M
a
r
c
h

2
0
0
8
Ao
r
t
l
Ma
v
Ju
n
e
Ju
t
v
Au
a
u
s
t
Se
n
t
e
m
b
e
r
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
Ma
r
c
h
To
t
a
l
s
80 81

T
r
u
e
.
U
p

o
f

T
r
u
e
-
U
p
$
(7
,
9
4
1
.
0
9
3
.
6
8
)
35
,
3
9
6
,
8
8
4
.
1
6
36
,
6
3
5
,
3
1
3
.
8
4
10
,
5
7
0
,
6
4
2
.
7
8
9,
5
3
3
,
3
8
6
.
1
0
8,7
9
1
,
0
9
0
,
2
4
8,
1
3
5
,
5
1
5
.
1
1
7,6
3
1
,
3
9
3
.
8
9
6,9
7
5
,
4
9
1
.
2
1
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
(7
,
9
4
1
J
)
9
3
.
B
8
)
82

A
d
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
:
83
20
0
6
-
0
7

p
e
A

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

p
e
r

O
r
d
e
r

N
o
,
$
42
,
1
1
5
,
2
7
9
.
6
3
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
42
,
1
1
5
,
2
7
9
.
6
3
84
Ta
x

s
e
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t

t
r
u
e
-
u
p

p
e
r

O
r
d
e
r

N
o
;

3
0
0
4
1
0.0
0
0.0
0
27
.
)
2
5
,
0
1
2
.
4
9
1
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
(2
7
,
0
2
5
,
0
1
2
.
4
9
'
85
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
86
34
,
1
7
4
,
1
8
5
.
7
5
35
,
3
9
6
,
8
8
4
.
1
6
9,
6
1
0
,
3
0
1
.
3
5
10
,
5
7
0
,
6
4
2
.
7
8
9,5
3
3
,
3
8
6
.
1
0
8,7
9
1
,
0
9
0
.
2
4
8,
1
3
5
,
5
1
5
.
1
1
7,6
3
1
,
3
9
3
.
8
9
6,
9
7
5
,
9
1
.
2
1
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
7,1
4
9
,
1
7
3
,
2
6
87 88

M
o
n
t
h
l
y

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

Ra
t
e

5.
0
%
5.0
%
5.
0
%
5.
0
%
5.0
%
5.
0
%
5.
0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
89 90

M
o
n
t
h
l

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
$
14
2
,
3
9
2
.
4
4
14
7
,
4
8
7
,
0
2
40
,
0
4
2
.
9
2
44
,
0
4
4
.
3
4
39
,
7
2
2
.
4
4
36
,
6
2
9
.
5
4
33
,
8
9
7
.
9
8
31
,
7
9
7
.
4
7
29
,
0
6
4
.
5
5
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
54
5
,
0
7
8
.
7
0
91 92
$
i1
,
0
3
0
,
3
0
5
.
9
7
'
1
1,0
9
0
,
9
4
2
.
6
6
)
(9
2
0
,
2
9
8
.
5
1

)
1,
0
8
1
,
3
0
1
.
0
2
78
2
,
0
1
8
.
3
0
69
2
,
2
0
4
.
6
7
53
8
,
0
1
9
.
2
0
68
7
,
7
0
0
.
1
5
41
4
,
0
1
9
,
1
3
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
1,1
0
3
.
7
1
5
.
3
3
93 94

M
o
n
t
h
l
v

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n

A
p
p
l
i
e
d

T
o

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
$
14
2
,
3
9
2
.
4
4
14
7
,
4
8
7
.
0
2
40
,
0
4
2
.
9
2
44
,
0
4
4
.
3
4
39
,
7
2
2
.
4
4
36
,
6
2
9
.
5
4
33
,
8
9
7
.
9
8
31
,
7
9
7
.
4
7
29
,
0
6
4
.
5
5
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
~
M.n
i
l
1
l
y
q
a
l
l
!
Î
C
I
"
'
'
'
I
¡
Î
W
\
ô
d
'
T
o
'
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
if
-(1

;
2
2
2
.
r
;
9
-
-
~
~
Z
T
j
--
-
T
i
~
i
:
~
Ü
~
4
-
2
9
ß
t
~

)
-T
0
6
(
)
:
'
:
~
4

T
,

4
:
~
)
i ,
0
3
7
,
2
5
6
6
8

.
74
2
.
2
9
5
.
8
6
65
5
,
5
7
5
1
3
50
'
4
)
2
1
2
2
.,
.

6
5
5
:
9
0
2
6
8

.
'3
8
(
9
5
4
:
8
._
.
.

.
,

'
0
:
0
0
--
-
'
o
:
o
¡
l
..

,
.
.
.
.
.

'
0
:
0
55
8
,
6
3
6
6
3
~97 98

E
n
d
i
n
g

T
r
u
e
~
U
p

o
f

t
h
e

T
r
u
e
-
U
p

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$
35
,
3
9
6
,
8
8
4
.
1
6
36
,
6
3
5
,
3
1
3
.
8
4
10
,
5
7
0
,
6
4
2
.
7
8
9,5
3
3
,
3
8
6
.
1
0
8,7
9
1
,
0
9
0
.
2
4
8,1
3
5
,
5
1
5
.
1
1
7,6
3
1
,
3
9
3
.
8
9
6,
9
7
5
,
4
9
1
.
2
1
6,5
9
0
,
5
3
6
.
6
3
0.0
0
0.
0
0
0.0
0
6,
5
9
0
,
5
3
6
.
6
3
99
10
0
. N
e
g
a
t
i
v
e

a
m
o
u
n
t
s

I
n
d
i
c
a
t
e

b
e
n
e
f
i
t

t
o

t
h
e

r
a
t
e
p
a
er
s
.
10
1
**

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

r
a
t
e

c
h
a
n
g
e
d

p
e
r

I
P
U
C

O
r
d
e
r

2
9
9
3
2
10
2~
-'.
Ao
r
l
J
Ma
v
Ju
n
e
Ju
l
Au
a
u
s
t
Se
o
t
e
m
b
e
r
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
Ma
r
c
h
To
t
a
l
s
10
4
Fi
x
e
d

C
o
s
t

A
d
u
s
t
m
e
n
¡
-
-
-
-
~
~
-
-
-
-

"
-
~
10
5
Be
a
i
n
n
i
n
o

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
0
(9
5
7
,
3
5
0
)
(8
3
4
.
2
7
4
:
(1
.
0
8
8
,
6
5
1

)
(1
1
7
7
,
5
3
1
)
(1
.
5
7
3
.
6
4
4
)
(1
.
7
2
4
3
1
7
)
(1
,
6
1
2
,
8
2
7
;
(1
,
7
9
6
,
5
'
1
1
)
0
0
0
0
10
6
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

F
C
A

d
e
f
e
r
r
l
u
.
(1
,
2
7
6
,
6
6
'
1
)
(1
1
,
Ð
1
1
)
Ci:
(
)
.
9
4
7
:
16
3
B
5
5
i
(4
9
1
1
1
5
1
25
5
,
1
8
0
)
(l
7
)
6
f
-
(:l
1
;
~
,
~
ì
4
:
.
\
)
(4
r
.
1
.
,
~
ì
1
7
)
0
0
0
F:U
2
9
,
'
1
(
1
)
10
7
Sm
a
l
l

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

F
C
A

d
e
f
e
r
r
a
l
u
.
31
9
,
3
1
7
13
4
,
9
8
8
78
,
5
7
0
72
,
9
7
5
95
,
0
0
2
10
4
,
5
0
6
12
9
,
2
5
7
12
9
,
6
5
8
11
9
,
4
2
6
0
0
0
1,
1
8
3
,
6
9
9
10
8
En
d
i
n
g

F
C
A

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(9
5
i
,
;
.
l
5
0
'
'8
3
4
,
2
7
4
'
(1
,
0
8
t
ì
.
6
5
1
1
(1
,
'
1
ì
7
,
5
3
'
1
)
(1
,
5
7
:
,
6
4
4
\
'1
,
7
2
4
,
~
ì
1
7
)
'1
,
6
1
2
,
8
2
7
)
'1
,
7
9
6
,
5
1
1
'
2,
1
4
5
.
4
W
1
0
0
0
'2
,
1
4
5
.
4
0
:
)
10
9
11
0
11
1
*u

A
p
r
i

a
m
o
n
t

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s

J
a
n
u
a
r
y

t
h
r
o
U
Q
h

A
p
r
i
l

D
e
f
e
r
r
a
l
s
s:
'1
:
"

'
õ

~
~
g
)
)
2
:
ro

r
.

r
:

g
;
i'
C
T
O

Z
o
Õ
c
¡
O
;:

8
.

~
:
i
PC
A
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-08-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
EXHIBIT NO.5
MICHAEL J. YOUNGBLOOD
~~c:::

-
m
"0

(
Q

"
0
)
(
&
~
n
g
;
CD

8
.

r
:

;
:
-"
-

O
z
o
-
C
P
O
¡;
t
l
~
U
i
ID
A
H
O

P
O
W
E
R

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
Fi
x
e
d

C
o
s
t

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t

M
o
n
t
h
l
y

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g

R
e
p
o
r
t
A
B
C
0
I
E
F
I
G
H
I
i
J
K
1
Fi
x
e
d

C
o
s
t

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
Ja
n
u
a
r
v
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
v
:
Ma
r
c
h
Ao
r
i
l
Ma
v
Ju
n
e
,
Ju
l
v
Au
o
u
s
t
Se
o
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
fo
r

t
h
e

v
e
a
r

e
n
d
e
d

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

3
1
,

2
0
0
7
I
:
3
1
i
4
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

F
C
A
:
,
(1
,
2
7
3
,
4
6
8
,
1
6
'

!
5
B
e
o
i
n
n
i
n
o

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$
0,0
0
14
2
1
,
6
1
0
.
3
1
\
'
18
6
7
,
6
4
4
.
2
3
.
(1
.
0
7
0
.
0
4
2
,
9
6
)
1
1,2
6
6
,
8
3
5
.
1
6
\
(1
,
5
9
9
,
1
0
9
.
1
6
)
(1
,
7
5
6
,
3
0
1
.
1
0
)
(2
,
2
4
0
,
0
9
8
,
0
3
)
6
A
m
o
u
n
t

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
$
42
1
.
8
1
0
.
3
1
.4
4
6
,
0
3
3
.
9
2
\
1
12
0
2
,
1
9
8
.
7
.
'1
9
6
,
7
9
2
.
2
0
)
1
(6
.
6
3
3
,
0
0
\
(3
2
5
,
6
4
1
.
0
0
'

:
1'1
5
7
,
1
9
1
.
8
4
)
14
8
3
,
7
9
6
,
,
1
3
)
24
5
.
8
4
5
.
3
7
7
E
n
d
i
n
o

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$
(4
2
1
,
8
1
0
.
3
1
(8
6
7
.
3
4
4
.
2
3
\
1
'1
,
0
7
0
,
0
4
2
.
9
6
)
1,2
6
6
,
8
3
5
.
1
6

1
11
,
2
7
3
,
4
6
8
.
1
6
'
.1
,
5
9
9
,
1
0
9
.
1
6
)
(1
,
7
5
6
,
3
0
1
.
1
0
)
2,
2
4
0
,
0
9
8
.
0
3
)
(2
,
4
8
5
.
9
4
3
.
9
0
)
8
:
1
9
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
:
10
Ac
c
r
u
a
l

t
h
r
u

P
r
i
o
r

M
o
n
t
h
f
0.
0
0
0.
0
0
11
.
7
5
7
.
5
4
(5
.
3
7
3
.
5
6
\
19
.
8
3
2
07
'
.
.

(
2
"
7
"
,
"
6
"
7
'
9
'
:
'
6
2
'
)
'

"
.
.
i
:
ï
4
j
g
i
5
4
11
Mo
n
t
h
l
v
5.0
%
5.
0
%
5,
0
%
5,0
%
0%
5.
0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
12
Mo
n
t
h
l
v
$
'Ò
.
Ò
Ò
(1
.
5
7
.
5
4
13
:
6
1
6
.
0
2
1
(4
.
4
5
8
.
5
1
(5
.
2
7
:
48
1
(5
.
3
0
6
.
1
2
\
16
.
6
6
2
.
9
5
\
17
.
3
1
7
.
9
2
\
19
.
3
3
3
.
7
4
13
0.
0
0
(1
.
7
5
7
.
5
4
\
(5
,
:
;
7

:
.
5
6
1
(9
,
8
3
2
0
7
~
--_
.
_
-
,
.
.
~
.
.
15
To
i
a
i
i
~
i
i
'
¡
i
d
e
'
;
t
i
a
i
ï
:
c
Ä
:
"
"
'
"

.
.
.
'
'
,
.
.
'
.
.
.
.
.
'
42
1
,
8
1
0
.
3
1
)
(8
6
9
,
6
0
1
.
7
7

:
(1
,
0
7
5
.
4
1
6
.
5
2
'
(1
.
2
7
6
,
6
6
7
.
2
3
)
1
(1
,
2
6
3
5
7
8
.
7
1
)
16
1
9
.
5
2
5
.
3
3
\
1
11
.
7
3
3
,
3
8
0
.
7
2
(2
.
2
7
4
,
4
9
5
.
5
7
1
(2
5
2
9
,
6
7
5
.
1
8
)
16
i
I
,
17
,
:
18
Sm
a
l
l

C
o
m
m
e
r
i
c
a
l

F
C
A
:
I
I
I
19
8e
i
i
i
n
n
i
n
Q

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$
0.
0
0
53
,
5
3
2
.
3
5

I
11
6
,
0
3
6
.
2
5
22
8
,
0
7
6
.
3
4

1
31
7
,
6
6
0
.
6
3
45
1
,
3
2
4
.
6
4

I
52
8
,
0
1
4
.
3
1
59
8
,
7
8
8
.
9
1
69
1
,
2
9
5
.
4
8
20
Am
o
u
n
t

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
$
53
5
3
2
.
3
5
62
5
0
3
.
9
0

:
11
2
0
4
0
.
0
9
89
,
5
3
4
.
2
9

1
13
3
,
6
6
4
.
0
1
76
,
6
8
9
.
6
7

I
70
,
7
7
4
.
6
0
92
,
5
0
6
.
5
7
10
1
,
6
2
6
.
0
3
21
En
d
i
n
g

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$
53
,
5
3
2
,
3
5
11
6
,
0
3
6
.
2
5

I
22
8
,
0
7
6
.
3
4
31
7
,
6
6
0
.
6
3

I
45
1
,
3
2
4
.
6
4
52
8
,
0
1
4
.
3
1

i
59
8
,
7
8
8
.
9
1
69
1
,
2
9
5
.
4
8
79
2
,
9
2
1
.
5
1
22 23
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
:
I
24
Ac
c
r
a
l

t
h
r
u

P
r
i
o
r

M
o
n
t
h
$
0.
0
0
0.
0
0

'
22
3
.
0
5
70
6
,
5
3

'
1,
6
5
6
.
8
5
2,
9
8
0
.
4
4

I
4,
8
6
0
.
9
6
7,
0
6
1
.
0
2
9,
5
5
5
.
9
7
25
Mo
n
t
h
l
v

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

R
a
t
e
5.
0
%
5.0
%
,
5.0
%
5.
0
%
5,
0
%
5.
0
%
1
5.
0
%
5.
0
%
5.0
%
26
Mo
n
t
h
l
v

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

I
n
c
l

E
X
D
)
$
0,
0
0
22
3
.
0
5

'
48
3
.
4
8
95
0
.
3
2
13
2
3
.
5
9
1 8
8
0
.
5
2

:
22
0
0
.
0
6
24
9
4
.
9
5
28
8
0
.
4
0
4
i.
n
,
~
~
~
!
.
i
'
.
"
,
!
~
.
e
'
!
.
!
o
.
.
.
q
!
,
!
.
e
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
.
_
.
,
.
.
.
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
L.
.
,
..
.
.
,
.
"
.
.
,
.
9
"
0
.
0
.
,
..
.
,

.
,
.
"
,
.
~
~
~
.
Q
S
,
+
"
'
,
.
,
.
.
.
,
l
Q
§
.
.
,
S
~
,
",
.
,
'
"

.
:
i
,
&
S
§
'
(
l
'
S
'
i
-
-
,
.
.
,
.
,
;
~
,
l
!
9
"
~
.
'
!
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.

,
,
~
l
e
.
6
9
:
~
q
,
.

.
"
Z
'
.
o
.
e
,
1
.
(
j
O
?
__
,

.
.
~
,
5
,
5
.
S
.
~
7
.
...
.
.

.
.
.
_
_
1
.
2
Æ
6
c
.
n
28A
T~
!
~
L
S
~
!
!
I
!
'
Ç
,
,
,
!
"
,
!
~
r
ç
,
i
!
!
t
~
£
A
;
,
.
_
_
,
_
_
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
..,
-
_
.
.
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
53
,
5
3
2
.
3
5
11
6
2
5
9
.
3
0

!
22
8
7
8
2
,
8
7
31
9
3
1
7
.
4
8

1
45
4
3
0
5
.
8
53
2
,
8
7
5
.
2
7

,
60
5
8
4
9
.
9
3
70
0
,
8
5
1
.
4
5
80
5
3
5
7
.
8
8
30
!
31
,
i
32
To
t
a
l

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
l
$
"3
6
8
,
2
7
7
9
6
)
'1
5
3
,
3
4
2
.
4
7
1
'8
4
6
,
6
3
3
,
6
5
\
95
7
,
3
4
9
.
7
5
83
4
.
2
7
3
.
6
3
'
1,
ü
8
6
,
6
5
0
.
5
6
)
1
(1
,
1
7
7
,
5
3
0
.
7
9
\
(1
.
5
7
3
.
6
4
4
.
1
2
1,
7
2
4
,
3
1
7
.
3
0
'
-#
_._
,
-
,
.
_
-
~
,
-
~
-
"
_
.
+
.
,
-
,
-
-
,
_
.
.
.
.
~
-
-
,
.
.
_
.
.
_
-
-
-
-
+
,
-
'
~
'
-
-
-
,
+
-
"
'
-
-
-
'
_
.
~
,
-
-
'
-
-
-
"
-
-
'
-
'
-
-
-
'
-
-
'
-
.-
-
.
,
.
.
.
,
".
'
-
-
,
.
.
.
,
.
,
.
.
.
,
-
-
,
.
,
"
.
"
.
,
.
.
.
,
.
,
-
,
.
.
34~
i:
'
l
t
r
y
.
t
i
-
'
:
i
.
o
,
I
i
~
.
t
o
.
,
~
r
i
o
.
r
y
'
r
,
a
.
2
ç
l
:
_
_

.
.
.
"

.
,
.
"
.
.
'
--
.
.
,
.
,
-
-
-
'
.
.
.
36
Or
.

5
9
9

X
O
O
0
0
1

9
9
9

2
5
4
3
0
2
--
37
Cr
.

5
9
9

X
O
O
O
O

1

9
9
9

2
5
4
3
0
3
I
~
.'-
-
-
-
-
.
'
-
-
-
-
.
'
-
-
-
"
"
"
-
-
.
'
-
.

r
-
"
"

-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
,
.
,
.
,
-
-
.
'
-
.
'
-
,
,
-
,
.
.
.
---
"
-
-
_
.
"
.

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,
-
-
-
,
-
,
-
_
.
.
,
-
-
-
-
-
-
,
-
-
39
'E
,
;
¡
'
i
e
.
s
:
"
'
-
-
"
"
'
-
-
'
,
.
.
-
-
-
-
"
"
'
"

.
.
,
"
-
-
.
38
5
,
0
6
4
.
5
1

I

9
3
,
2
9
1
.
1
8
.
40
Or
.

5
9
9

X
0
0
0
0
1

9
9
9

1
8
2
3
0
2

1
2
5
4
3
0
2
36
8
,
2
7
7
9
6
11
0
,
7
1
6
.
1
0
I
1
2
3
,
0
7
6
.
1
2
12
5
2
,
3
7
6
.
9
3

i
(9
0
,
8
8
0
.
2
3
(3
9
6
,
1
1
3
.
3
3
15
0
,
6
7
3
.
1
8
41
Cr
.

5
9
9

X
0
0
0
0
1

9
9
9
4
0
7
4
0
5
36
8
,
2
7
7
.
9
6
38
3
,
5
3
0
.
0
2

'
90
,
1
5
8
.
6
4
10
7
,
2
0
7
.
9
1
(1
2
7
,
0
3
1
.
0
1
24
8
,
9
5
1
.
3
3

!
86
,
4
1
7
.
3
4
39
1
,
2
9
0
.
3
6
14
4
,
2
1
9
.
8
4
42
Cr
,

9
9
8

X
0
0
0
0
1

9
9
9
4
2
1
0
0
6

4
3
1
0
1
3
.
1,
5
3
4
.
4
9
3,1
3
2
.
5
4
3,5
0
8
.
1
9
3,
9
5
4
.
8
9
3,4
2
5
.
6
0

!
4,
4
6
2
.
8
9
4,
8
2
2
.
9
7
6,
4
5
3
.
3
4
43
I
~g::

-
m
1)
(
0

1
)

x
~
~
n
2
:
tD
8
.
r
;
g
;
:;
:
.
~
~
;;
~
~
(
¡
ID
A
H
O

P
O
W
E
R

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
Fi
x
e
d

C
o
s
t

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t

M
o
n
t
h
l
y

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g

R
e
p
o
r
t
A
B
L
M
N
0
P
Q
R
S
T
1
Fi
x
e
d

C
o
s
t

A
d
l
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
Ja
n
u
a
r
v

2
0
0
8
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
v

2
0
0
8
Ma
r
c
h

2
0
0
8
Ao
r
i
l
2
0
0
8
Ma
v

2
0
0
8
To
t
a
l
s
2
fo
r

t
h
e

v
e
a
r

e
n
d
e
d

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

3
1
,

2
0
0
7
-
3 4
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

F
C
A
:
(3
,
4
3
~
9
,
7
9
9
~
W
-"
5
B
e
o
i
n
n
i
n
o

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$
12
,
4
8
5
,
9
4
3
.
9
0
)
"2
,
4
9
3
,
3
5
1
.
5
9
)
(2
,
7
0
0
,
3
0
5
.
6
2
)
13
,
2
5
2
,
9
7
"
j

.
8
0
)
3,
2
5
2
,
9
7
1
.
8
0
)
13
,
4
3
9
,
7
9
9
.
5
9
)
(3
,
4
3
9
,
7
9
9
5
9
6
A
m
o
u
n
t

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
$
7,4
0
7
.
6
9
)
(3
0
2
,
9
5
4
.
0
3
)
14
5
6
.
6
6
6
,
1
5
.
0,0
0
r1
8
6
8
2
7
.
7
9
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
nA
3
9
,
7
i
:
9
~
5
9
'
-+
Er
i
.
'
i
n
g

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
,-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,
-
-
l.
_
_ß
4
9
3
,
3
5
1
,
5
9
)
~~
i
L
~
_(
:
5
2
,
9
7
1
8
0
--
3
,
2
5
2
,
9
7
1
.
8
0
\
(3
,
4
3
9
,
7
9
9
,
5
9
)
(3
.
4
3
9
,
7
9
9
.
5
9
'
(3
,
4
3
9
,
7
9
9
,
5
9
)
(3
,
4
3
9
.
9
9
.
5
9
1
8
--
--
-
,
-
--
-
,
-
-
9
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
:
10

A
c
c
r
u
a
l

t
h
r
u

P
r
i
o
r

M
o
n
t
h
'$
I.
'

T
d

?
A
\
.
,
.
,

(
5
4
6
8
9
3
8
'.
'
i
5
4
,
4
7
i
ü
4
'i
7
6
,
i
2
9
5
f
'8
9
,
5
8
3
5
6
)
,-

-
-
-
-
ï
i
-
ü
¡
:
7
9
4
.
'
6
1
-
)
".
,

'
l
1
i
9
,
i
2
7
1
1
"
"
"
"
T
i
à
3
'
:
4
5
9
~
"
6
T
)
11
5.0
%
5,
0
%
5,
0
%
5,
0
%
5.
0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5,0
%
12
11
1
6
5
1
,
2
7
)
11
4
7
.
7
9
2
.
13
I to

da
t
e

,(
;
¡
~
,
Q
a
e
3
.
8
)
,.
,

,

,
.

(
e
~
.
~
?
a
.
~
~
)
.
,
.
,
.

.
,
'

(
?
e
,
g
e
e
,
1
)
,
(
a
,
e
,
e
8
:
i
e
¡
;
)
."
.

,
j
1
Q
~
J
e
4
¡
;
1
)

.
,
'
(1
1
9
,
1
2
7
1
1
)

.
,
_
L
l
~
~
_
,
_
4
.
?
~
,
:
,
e
J
)
i
_
.
--(1
4
7
.
7
9
2
.
1
1
)
~
--,
-
_
.
_
,
.
,
.
_
,
.
15
rõ
i
à
ï
'
R
e
.
ï
d
ë
n
t
i
a
i
F
C
A
:

,
.
-
-
,
-
-
-
-
,
-
-
,

"'-

(2
,
5
4
7
,
4
4
0
.
9
7
'
(2
,
8
6
0
.
7
8
3
.
9
i
3
3,3
2
9
,
1
0
1
.
4
1
1
'3
,
3
4
2
6
5
5
-
4
6
'
13
,
5
4
4

5
9
4
.
2
0
í3
5
5
B
,
9
2
6
,
7
0
)
13
,
5
7
3
,
2
5
9
.
2
0
.
'
13
,
5
8
7
,
5
9
1
.
0
'
(3
,
5
3
7
,
5
9
1
.
7
0
16 17 18

S
m
a
l
l

C
o
m
m
e
r
i
c
a
l

F
C
A
:
19
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$
79
2
,
9
2
1
.
5
1
91
8
,
8
7
4
.
2
6
1,
0
4
4
,
7
0
3
,
8
7
1,
1
5
9
,
7
7
6
,
7
7
1,
1
5
9
,
7
7
6
.
7
7
1,1
3
9
,
3
7
5
,
1
9
1,1
3
9
,
3
7
5
,
1
9
1,1
3
9
,
3
7
5
.
1
9
20
Am
o
u
n
t

D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
$
12
5
,
9
5
2
.
5
12
5
,
8
2
9
,
6
1
11
5
,
0
7
2
,
9
0
0,
0
0
20
,
4
0
1
.
5
8
)
0.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
11
3
9
,
3
7
5
,
1
9
21
En
d
i
n
o

B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$
91
8
,
8
7
4
.
2
6
1,
0
4
4
,
7
0
3
,
8
7
1,
1
5
9
,
7
7
6
.
7
1,
1
5
9
,
7
7
6
.
7
1,
1
3
9
,
3
7
5
.
1
9
1,1
3
9
,
3
7
5
.
1
9
1,1
3
9
,
3
7
5
.
1
9
1,1
3
9
,
3
7
5
.
1
9
22 23
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
:
24
Ac
c
r
u
a
l

t
h
r
u

P
r
i
o
r

M
o
n
t
h
$
12
,
4
3
6
,
3
7
15
,
7
4
0
.
2
1
19
,
5
6
8
.
8
5
23
,
9
2
1
.
7
8
28
,
7
5
4
.
1
8
33
,
4
1
6
.
5
8
38
,
1
6
3
,
9
8
42
,
9
1
1
.
3
8
25
Mo
n
t
h
l
v

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t

R
a
t
e
5,
0
%
5.
0
%
5.0
%
5,
0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%
26
Mo
n
t
h
l
v

I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
l
n
c
l

E
x
o

1
$
33
0
3
.
8
4
38
2
8
.
6
4
43
5
2
,
9
3
4,8
3
2
.
4
0
46
6
2
.
4
0
47
4
7
.
4
0
4,
7
4
7
.
4
0
4,
7
4
7
.
4
0
47
6
5
8
.
7
8
4
1!
,
l
e
!
_
e
~
!
.
~
~
~
,
c
1
,
l
!
_
a
!
'
t
"
,
_
"
_
_
_
,
,
,
_
_
_
,
_

.
,
'
,
'
,
'
L,
_
_
_,
_
_
,
_
_
l
S
i
?
~
,
Q
:
:
¡
1
.
__
_
.
,
,
_
J
.
~
,
s
§
.
e
&
S
,
,_
,
.
.
_
_
,
.
2
~
J
,
~
?
!
,
?
!
L
__
.
_
_
,
?
e
i
?
S
~
,
1
e
,
.
,_
"
'
_
_
_
3
.
3
.
,
~
J
,
S
,
s
L
,
""
,
_
i
e
,
!
.
6
,
3
.
:
~
j
l
,
'"

_
_
4
,
?
,
~
J
L
3
.
S
,
,,
_
_
,

,
~
7
&
5
.
a
:
?
!
1
.
28~
!5
'
,
t
~
l
.
!
r
n
"
-
I
I
.
i
;
,
c
:
I
1
,
'
!
"
!
ç
i
"
-
I
,
~
,
i
;
~
-
,
,
_
_
_
,
_
,
_
,
,
,
,
,
.
93
4
6
1
4
.
4
7
10
6
4
2
7
2
7
2
1,
1
8
3
6
9
8
.
5
5
11
8
8
5
3
0
.
9
5
11
7
2
,
7
9
1
.
7
7
1,1
7
7
,
5
3
9
,
1
7
1,
1
8
2
,
2
8
6
,
5
7
1,
1
8
7
,
0
3
3
,
9
7
1 1
8
7
,
0
3
3
.
9
7
30 31 32
To
t
a
l

F
i
x
e
d

C
o
s
t

A
d
J
u
s
t
m
e
n
l
$
1,
6
1
2
,
8
2
6
.
5
0
'
1,
7
9
6
,
5
1
1
.
2
4
12
,
1
4
5
,
4
0
2
.
8
6
'
(2
,
!
5
4
,
-
1
2
4
5
1
'
(2
,
3
7
1
,
6
0
2
4
3
'
12
,
:
3
8
1
,
3
8
7
,
5
3
)
'2
.
3
9
0
,
9
7
2
,
6
3
)
2.4
0
0
,
5
5
7
,
7
3
)
(2
,
4
0
0
,
5
5
7
.
7
3
)
33 34~
r=
-
"
l
r
y
J
c
:
.
r
n
(
)
,
~
e
J
o

.
e
r
i
c
:
r
,
.
I
.
"
,
~
~
t
.
_
_
"

.
'
.
.
_
'
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
,
.
,
.
-
._
-
-
,
.
,
.
,
.
,
.
.
.
,
.
"
.
,
.
,
.
_
,
.
,
.
_
,
.
,
.
.
.
,
.
.
_
-
36
Dr
.

5
9
9

X
0
0
0
0
1

9
9
9

2
5
4
3
0
2
. "
'
i
:
i
4
5
;
4
0
i
:
i
i
E
j
'
37
Cr
,

5
9
9

X
0
0
0
0
1

9
9
9

2
5
4
3
0
3
(2
,

'
1
4
5
,
4
0
2
.
8
6
)
~
_._
-
-
-
"
'
-
,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,
-
-
,
.
,
-
-
-
,
-
-
-
-
_
.
--
'
-
"

-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-

-
-

~
-
-
-
,
-
_
.
,
-
-
,
,
-
39
'Ë
ñ
t
¡
:
i
e
s
:
'
"
-
'
~
-
'
-
'
-
'
"
'
'
'
.
-
.
_
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
'
-
.
,
-
-
-
-
'
-
-
'
-
-
-
'
-
-
-
-
-
-
"
_
.
,
.
"
-
_
.
,
-
-
,
.

-
-
-
40
Dr
.

5
9
9

X
0
0
0
0
1

9
9
9

1
8
2
3
0
2

2
5
4
3
0
2
1
11
1
,
4
9
0
,
8
0
18
3
,
6
8
4
,
7
4
34
8
,
8
9
1
.
6
2
18
,
7
2
1
,
6
5
21
7
,
6
7
7
.
9
2
19
,
5
8
5
.
1
0
9,
5
8
5
.
1
0
9,
5
8
5
,
1
0
2,4
0
0
,
5
5
7
,
7
3
41
Cr
.

5
9
9

X
0
0
0
0
1

9
9
9
4
0
7
4
0
5
(1
1
8
,
5
4
5
,
0
6
17
7
,
1
2
4
.
4
2
34
1
,
5
9
3
,
2
8
20
7
,
2
2
9
,
3
7
-
2,3
0
0
,
4
2
4
.
4
0
42
Cr
.

9
9
8

X
O
O
O
O
1

9
9
9
4
2
1
0
0
6

(
4
3
1
0
1
3
7,
0
5
4
.
2
6
6,5
6
0
.
3
2
7,2
9
8
,
3
4
8,7
2
1
,
6
5
10
,
4
4
8
.
5
5
9,5
8
5
,
1
0
9,
5
8
5
.
1
0
9,
5
8
5
,
1
0
10
0
,
1
3
3
.
3
3
43
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-08-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
EXHIBIT NO.6
MICHAEL J. YOUNGBLOOD
ID
A
H
O

P
O
W
E
R

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
De
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

2
0
0
8

F
C
C

a
n
d

F
C
E

R
a
t
e
s
Ra
t
e

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Sm
a
l
l

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Te
s
t

Y
e
a
r
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
Co
u
n
t
35
9
,
8
0
1
,
5
30
,
8
9
9
.
2
Te
s
t

Y
e
a
r
En
e
r
g
y
4,
5
0
3
,
8
6
5
,
2
3
0
21
8
,
6
0
5
,
8
2
5
Ba
s
e

R
a
t
e~
$
2
6
6
,
7
2
8
,
0
2
9
$
1
6
,
0
3
9
,
9
3
7
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r~Ch
a
r
g
e
$
1
7
,
4
9
1
,
0
8
4
$
1
,
4
9
2
,
3
8
2
IP
C
-
E
-
0
5
-
2
8

R
a
t
e
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Re
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
th
r
o
u
g
h
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r

E
n
e
r
g
y
Ad
j
u
s
m
e
n
t

C
h
a
r
g
e
$
(
7
9
,
3
4
2
)

$

2
4
9
,
3
1
6
,
2
8
7
$
(
7
,
9
4
4
)

$

1
4
,
5
5
5
,
4
9
9
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e

R
a
t
e
$0
.
0
5
5
3
5
6
$0
,
0
6
6
5
8
3
Fi
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
$
1
4
2
,
4
1
5
,
6
2
6
$
9
,
0
8
0
,
7
0
5
IP
C
-
E
-
0
5
-
2
8
E£
$0
,
0
3
1
6
2
1
$0
.
0
4
1
5
3
9
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

o
f
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e

R
a
t
e
57
,
1
%
62
.
4
%
IP
C
-
E
-
0
5
-
2
8
.E
$3
9
5
.
8
2
$2
9
3
.
8
8
IP
C
-
E
-
0
7
-
0
8

R
a
t
e
s
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Sm
a
l
l

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ev
e
n
u
e
Re
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
Te
s
t

Y
e
a
r
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
th
r
o
u
g
h
IP
C
.
E
-
0
5
.
2
8
C
!
:
Te
s
t

Ye
a
r

Ba
s
e

R
a
t
e
~
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
En
e
r
g
y
Pe
r
c
e
n
t

o
f
IP
C
.
E
-
0
7
.
0
8
Fi
x
e
d

C
o
s
t
IP
C
.
E
.
0
7
.
0
8
Co
u
n
t
En
e
r
g
y
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Ch
a
r
g
e
Ad
j
u
s
m
e
n
t
Ch
a
r
g
e
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e

R
a
t
e
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e

R
a
t
e
FC
E
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
.E
38
5
,
3
2
4
,
6
4,
9
6
4
,
0
9
7
,
0
4
4
$
3
0
7
,
9
0
9
,
9
3
3
$
1
8
,
6
2
4
,
8
1
7
$
-
$
2
8
9
,
2
8
5
,
1
1
6
$0
,
0
5
8
2
7
5
57
.
1
%
$0
.
0
3
3
2
8
8
$
1
6
5
,
2
4
6
,
8
1
0
$4
2
8
.
8
5
31
,
2
0
9
,
5
20
8
,
0
4
3
,
3
9
2
$
16
,
2
5
0
,
9
2
3
$
1,
5
0
3
,
8
2
3
$
-
$
1
4
,
7
4
7
,
1
0
0
$0
,
0
7
0
8
8
5
62
.
4
%
$0
,
0
4
4
2
2
3
$
9,
2
0
0
,
2
3
8
$2
9
4
,
7
9
~~c:::

-
m
"0
(
0

"
0
)
(
~
~
n
g
;
CD

8
.

i
;

;
:
;:
-
~
~
-"
0
0
'
..

(
"

.
i

O
J
Ex
h
i
t

6
.
x
l
s
.
3
1
1
4
1
2
0
0
.
m
b
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-08-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
EXHIBIT NO. 7
MICHAEL J. YOUNGBLOOD
Idaho Power Company
I.P.U.C. No. 29. Tariff No. 101 Original Sheet No. 54-1
SCHEDULE 54
FIXED COST ADJUSTMENT
APPLICABILITY
This schedule is applicable to the electric energy delivered to all Idaho retail Customers
receiving service under Schedules 1, 4, or 5 (Residential Service) or under Schedule 7 (Small General
Service).
FIXED COST PER CUSTOMER RATE
The Fixed Cost per Customer rate (FCC) is determined by dividing the Company's fixed cost
components for Residential and Small General Service Customers by the average number of
Residential and Small General Service customers, respectively.
Residential FCC
Effective Date
January 1, 2008
Rate
$428.85 per Customer
Small General Service FCC
Effective Date
January 1, 2008
Rate
$294.79 per Customer
FIXED COST PER ENERGY RATE
The Fixed Cost per Energy rate (FCE) is determined by dividing the Company's fixed cost
components for Residential and Small General Service customers by the weather-normalized annual
energy load for Residential and Small General Service customers, respectively.
Residential FCE
Effective Date
January 1, 2008
Rate
3.3288Ø per kWh
Small General Service FCE
Effective Date
January 1, 2008
Rate
4.4223Ø per kWh
ALLOWED FIXED COST RECOVERY AMOUNT
The Allowed Fixed Cost Recovery amount is computed by multiplying the annual average
number of Residential and Small General Service customers by the appropriate Residential and Small
General Service FCC rate.
Exhibit NO.7
IPC-E-08-04
M. Youngblood, IPC
Page 1 of2
IDAHO
Issued - March 14, 2008
Effective - June 1, 2008
Issued by IDAHO POWER COMPANY
John R. Gale, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
1221 West Idaho Street, Boise, Idaho
Idaho Power Company
I.P.U.C. No. 29, Tariff No. 101 Original Sheet No. 54-2
SCHEDULE 54
FIXED COST ADJUSTMENT
(Continued)
ACTUAL FIXED COSTS RECOVERED AMOUNT
The Actual Fixed Costs Recovered amount is computed by multiplying the annual weather-
normalized energy load for Residential and Small General Service customers by the appropriate
Residential and Small General Service FCE rate.
FIXED COST ADJUSTMENT
The Fixed Cost Adjustment (FCA) is the difference between the Allowed Fixed Cost Recovery
Amount and the Actual Fixed Costs Recovered Amount divided by the estimated annual weather-
normalized energy load for the following year for Residential and Small General Service Customers.
The monthly Fixed Cost Adjustment for Residential Service (Schedules 1, 4, and 5) is (0.0708
cents) per kWh. The monthly Fixed Cost Adjustment for Small General Service (Schedule 7) is 0.2558
cents per kWh.
EXPIRATION
The Fixed Cost Adjustment included on this schedule will expire May 31, 2009.
Exhibit No, 7
IPC-E-08-04
M, Youngbloo, IPC
Page 20f2
IDAHO
Issued - March 14, 2008
Effective - June 1,2008
Issued by IDAHO POWER COMPANY
John R. Gale, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
1221 West Idaho Street, Boise, Idaho