Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070723Idaho Winds LLC comments.pdf...;~~.:: . "i 3: ;:U ;J"iiL i Idaho Winds LLc 19 July 2007 Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington Street O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 Sent via e-mail to jean.jewell~puc.idaho.gov Attention: Ms. Jean Jewell, Secretary Subject: .tCase No. IPC-06-34, Hot Springs Windfarm, LLC Case No. IPC-06-, Bennett Creek Windfarm, LLC Comments of Idaho Winds LLC First Amendments to Firm Energy Sales Agreements Dear Ms. Jewell: Please find attached for filing in the above referenced matters the Comments of Idaho Winds LLC ("Comments") to Idaho Power Company s July 11 , 2007 Motions for Approval of Amendments of Firm Energy Sales Agreements in connection with the Hot Springs Windfarm and Bennett Creek Windfarm projects. An original and seven (7) copies of our Comments for each Case are also being sent to you via S. mail. Please contact me if you have any questions at 925.388.0072. Sincerely, Idaho Winds LLC William Damon Vice President 5356 N. Cattail Way. Boise, Idaho 83714 phone 208.853.4602 . e-mail wd~powerworks.com . www.powerworks.com William Damon, Vice President Idaho Winds LLC 5356 N. Cattail Way Boise, Idaho 83714 Phone: 925.388.0072 Fax: 925.388.0073 wd~powerworks.com , .. , 0 , ,'" ' 00 ,-.. ' i ; L.., ,.. , , '".. ," '", , ' BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A) FIRM ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC ENERGY BETWEEN IDAHO POWER COMPANY AND HOT SPRINGS WINDFARM, LLC IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A) FIRM ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC ENERGY BETWEEN IDAHO POWER COMPANY AND BENNETT CREEK WINDFARM, LLC CASE NO. IPC-O6- COMMENTS OF IDAHO WINDS LLC TO IDAHO POWER'S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT OF FIRM ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT CASE NO. IPC-O6- COMMENTS OF IDAHO WINDS LLC TO IDAHO POWER'S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT OF FIRM ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT COMES NOW Idaho Winds LLC ("Idaho Winds ) and submits the following comments to the July 11 , 2007 motions ("Motions ) of Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power" or the Company ) for orders of the Idaho Public Utility Commission (the "Commission ) approving amendments ("Amendments ) to those two certain Firm Energy Sales Agreements , both dated December 20 2006 , between Idaho Power and Hot Springs Windfarm , LLC ("Hot Springs ), on the one hand, and Bennett Creek Windfarm , LLC ("Bennett Creek"), on the other hand (individually, an "Agreement," and collectively, the "Agreements Comments of Idaho Winds LLC INTRODUCTION These comments of Idaho Winds apply identically to both Motions of Idaho Power, in connection with the Hot Springs Windfarm and Bennett Creek Windfarm projects, given that the subject matter and details of both Motions and projects are identical. The Motions of Idaho Power request that the Commission issue orders approving the Amendments to the Agreements that (1) revise the wind turbine manufacturer and specifications; (2) revise the scheduled operation date; and (3) provide liquid security ("Delay Security ) in the amount of estimated Delay Liquidated Damages (as defined in the Agreements). Idaho Power further requests in Section 11 of the Motions that the Commission concur that Idaho Power propose a similar resolution in the form of Delay Security for those other wind projects facing similar delays due to unanticipated interconnection delays. Idaho Winds desires to comment only on the Delay Security matter. BACKGROUND Idaho Winds and Idaho Power have entered into that certain 20-year Firm Energy Sales Agreement dated December 12 2006 (or power purchase agreement, "PPA") for the 18 MW Alkali Wind Farm (the "Project"), which the Commission approved by Order No. 30253 on February 26 , 2007 (Case No. IPC-06-36). This Project is one of the "other wind projects in the same area" that Idaho Power refers to in Section 11 of its Motions that face "similar delays due to unanticipated (by the developer) interconnection delays." Idaho Winds is currently in discussions with Idaho Power s delivery business unit and , like Hot Springs and Bennett Creek it has become apparent that the Project will require network upgrades in order to accommodate the Project's generation and the time required for completion of necessary studies and the construction of necessary interconnection facilities and network upgrades will delay the Project's online date beyond the December 31 , 2007 Scheduled Operation Date, triggering Delay Liquidated Damages (the foregoing capitalized terms are as defined in the PPA). Comments of Idaho Winds LLC DELAY SECURITY UNFAIR AND OF NO VALUE Even if Hot Springs and Bennett Creek are willing to provide Delay Security for their projects, Idaho Winds should not be forced to do the same for its Project, or other developers for their projects, because the imposition of a Delay Security is unfair to the developer. The need for network upgrades , and the attendant studies , construction activities , and time schedules, is determined by and through the control of Idaho Power-so why should the developer, like Idaho Winds, be punished with the requirement to provide Delay Security? The developer has not caused the delay. Idaho Power claims in Section 10 of its Motions that it believes the Delay Security provision "provides value for the Company and its customers " but Idaho Power offers no substantiation of this value. Idaho Winds contends that the provision is of no value because, as the Commission is reminded, the PPA includes a Delay Liquidated Damages provision and Idaho Winds is contractually bound to pay such damages , if any, regardless of the posting of any Delay Security. In its Order No. 30253, the Commission s staff supported the inclusion of this Delay Liquidated Damages provision in the PPA as it believed "it is reasonable for Idaho Power to begin inserting damage provisions into PURPA contracts to provide a mechanism for the Company to be made whole if it incurs higher costs to acquire replacement power " and with no need for any type of Delay Security. As Idaho Power further states in Section 10 of its Motions, this "provision is not currently in this or other OF contracts " but no overriding reason is offered as to why it must be included in these Agreements or any other OF contracts. CONCLUSION If not for delays caused by Idaho Power s delivery business unit, the Alkali Project would meet the Scheduled Operation Date. If Idaho Winds is not causing the delay, why should it be punished by being required to provide Delay Security? Moreover, the Delay Liquidated Damages provision of Alkali Project's PPA is adequate to protect Idaho Power and its customers from any excess costs that might be incurred to purchase replacement power due to Comments of Idaho Winds LLC any Project startup delays for which Idaho Winds would be responsible, and the Commission does not need to impose any unfair and extraneous Delay Security provision upon Idaho Winds and its PPA, or upon any other developer in a similar situation. DATED this 19th day of July, 2007 By:tJ~ ;to -'1 William Damon , Vice President Idaho Winds LLC 5356 N. Cattail Way Boise , Idaho 83714 P: 925.388.0072 F: 925.388.0073 E: wd~powerworks.com Comments of Idaho Winds LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 19th day of July, 2007, I caused to be served, via the methodes) indicated below, true and correct copies of the foregoing document, upon: Jean Jewell , Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington Street O. Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0074 jean.jewell~puc.idaho.gov Scott Woodbury Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission O. Box 83720 Boise , ID 83720-0074 scott. wood bu ry~puc. idaho .gov Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney Monica B. Moen, Attorney II Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street O. Box 70 Boise, ID 83707 bkline~idahopower.com mmoen~idahopower.com Ric Gale VP-Pricing and Regulatory Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street O. Box 70 Boise, ID 83707 c/o rallphin~idahopower.com Dean J. Miller Attorney for Hot Springs and Bennett Creek McDevitt & Miller LLP 420 W. Bannock Boise, ID 83701 c/o joe~mcdevitt-miller.com By: Hand Delivered U~S~.Maitx. Fax Fed. Express EmailX Hand Delivered S. Mail Fax P(39.E~press EmaH Hand Delivered S. Mail Fax Fed. Express EmailX Hand Delivered S. Mail Fax Fed. Express Em&ilFx Hand Delivered S. Mail Fax P~.Express EmailX 'W~.;?'. D William Damon , Vice President Idaho Wind LLC Comments of Idaho Winds LLC