20070829press release.htm

./082907_IPCoCassiaupgrades_files/filelist.xml IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
9.35 pt 2 IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Case No. IPC-E-06-21, Order No. 30414 August 29, 2007 Contact: Gene Fadness [phone], 890-2712

Website:
http://www.puc.idaho.gov/www.puc.idaho.gov

Settlement between Idaho Power, wind developers OK’d

The Idaho Public Utilities Commission today approved a negotiated settlement between wind developers and Idaho Power Co. over who should pay for transmission upgrades required to accommodate about 200 megawatts of new wind generation planned in the Magic Valley.

To prevent transmission overload that could take place with the new projects, Idaho Power maintained it needed to upgrade its transmission system in the area at a cost of $60 million, a cost to be borne primarily by wind developers. Jared Grover, a developer for the Cassia Gulch Wind Park and Cassia Wind Farm, filed a complaint with the commission stating all Idaho Power ratepayers, not just developers, would benefit from the upgrades and should help pay for them. Further, Grover argued, requiring developers to pay for the upgrades would threaten the economic viability of his projects and stifle further development of renewable energy in Idaho.

Idaho Power has the transmission capability to handle the anticipated 200 MW in new generation under normal circumstances. However, existing transmission capacity is not sufficient to meet the company’s required reliability standards during times of emergency, such as when transmission lines are out of service.

After settlement discussions, Idaho Power and wind developers agreed that the installation of equipment that would allow the wind generators to reduce output during times of transmission constraint would significantly reduce the amount of transmission upgrades required. The equipment, to be installed at wind developers’ expense, would allow the wind generators to reduce output when they receive a “redispatch” notice from Idaho Power at least 10 minutes in advance of the time output needs to be reduced.

“The parties agree that redispatch should be a rare occurrence,” the commission said. “If it proves otherwise, the commission expects to be notified by the utility.”

With the ability to curtail generation during times of transmission overload, the cost of needed upgrades is reduced from $60 million to $11 million. The parties agreed on a formula to pay for the remaining $11 million. Idaho Power will pay all the costs for the first phase of a planned five-phased upgrade. For the remaining four phases, 25 percent of costs would be provided by the developer and 25 percent by Idaho Power Co., the latter to be included in rate base for future recovery from customers systemwide. The remaining 50 percent would be advanced by the developer, but refunded over a term not to exceed 10 years after the projects are commercially viable. The refunded amounts would then be included in rate base.

Requiring the wind developers to pay for at least 25 percent of upgrade costs is beneficial to all customers, the commission said, because it creates an incentive for developers to consider economic efficiencies when they choose locations for their wind farms. That reduces the potential for the shifting of costs from the developers to the company and its customers, which could occur if no upgrade costs were assessed against developers, the commission said.

“We congratulate the parties on fashioning what we find to be a workable, least-cost and reasonable solution to capacity and operational constraints on the transmission system that will benefit Idaho Power, its customers and Cassia,” the commission said.

The transmission upgrades, Idaho Power said, will provide the company with a more robust transmission system serving the Magic Valley and the Wood River Valley. 

A complete copy of the commission’s order is available on the commission’s homepage at
http://www.puc.idaho.gov/www.puc.idaho.gov. Click on the electric icon, then on “Electric Cases,” and scroll down to Case No. IPC-E-06-21.