20060927Weber Additional Comment.pdf

vvVy
/1
(()~'- '
I: l..~
- H
Page 1 of
(J"-hGi(~( tUiV\W\&1 cr
Jean Jewell
From: john weber (js weber~hotmail.com)
Sent: Tuesday, September 19 20068:19 PMTo: Jean Jewell
Subject: RE: Your Comments Regarding Case No. IPC-06-
Dear Jean Jewell
Thank you for your e-mail. I'm glad you received the printed comments. If you did not receive the
revised e-mail it's possible Idaho Power,qi~Lrg~J.~l~g~wiJLr~send it to Maggie Brilz, Barton Kline, and
~~,
M()en'asreEi~ste(fby'the'appTi'cation.
""""""", ""., "" "" "
A small piece of useful information regarding the case. In the September "Customer Connection" by
Idaho Power it states "the first 300 KWH are billed at 5.4 cents per kwh, while every kwh used over 300
is billed at 6.1 cents per KWH", My neighbor runs his ac 24/7 and I'm guessing uses 80 KWH per day.
, in less than 4 days he is paying 6.1 cents per KWH. My point is Idaho Power is paying me 5.4 cents
per KWH and selling my surplus to my neighbor for 6.1 cents a KWH. Doing the math this is a 13%
markup (profit) for Idaho Power which differs from Idaho Power s statement "pays customers more than
the actual value of the generation itself'. On page 1 of the case.
,,-....-..,..--..-....,.."."".-........-.- ................ "'....-......-"....'.. ,....", "",....,.......-........................,.".....
Regards
John Weber
c""
..., .,.." ."......,....
Search-Your way, your world, rightnow!
9/21/2006