Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20031031Application.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSIONER HANSEN COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL WORKING FILE FROM:DANIEL KLEIN IPc.'f.- o~~/7 DATE:OCTOBER 31, 2003 RE:FORMAL COMPLAINT OF YOLANDE BENNETT On October 10, 2003, the Commission received a request to file a fonnal complaint (attached) ITom Ms. Yolande Bennett against Idaho Power. Ms. Bennett is requesting that charges for electrical service ITom May 2003 to July 2003 be adjusted to the same amounts billed for the same time period in 2002. BACKGROUND Ms. Bennett left her home March 26 to travel to California. Ms. Bennett maintains she turned everything off but her refrigerator and water heater. Her bills were being forwarded to California, and she noticed her bills were quite high for her not being at home. Ms. Bennett was in contact with Idaho Power during her absence and voiced her concerns with the high bills. Ms. Bennett maintains she was overbilled approximately $150. In response to Ms. Bennett's concerns, Idaho Power verified meter reads after the May and July bills were issued. After Ms. Bennett spoke with a Customer Service Assistant Coach on July 8, 2003 , a neighbor went into the house at Ms. Bennett's request to make sure everything but the reftigerator was turned off at the breaker. Upon Ms. Bennett's return home, an Idaho Power Delivery Service Representative met her at home on July 25 , 2003 to check for problems inside the residence. At that time, the meter was showing very little usage. The residence is an all-electric two-bedroom townhouse with baseboard heating and no air conditioning. The Delivery Service Representative set up a watt per hour meter on the refrigerator to determine usage. No problem was identified. DECISION MEMORANDUM OCTOBER 31 2003 On July 29, the customer s meter was replaced and sent to Boise for testing. The old meter tested at 99.55% accurate. Idaho Power maintains that the baseboard heating must have been left on during the customer s absence. The Company maintains that degree-day data supports this theory. STAFF ANALYSIS Commission Staff has been in contact with both Ms. Bennett and Idaho Power. Ms. Bennett's usage during the period in question is considerably higher than in the past. 2002 2003 1409 1253 April 856 JuneMarchMay 590 1399 270 1689 July 129 670 August 329 730 230 The cause of the discrepancy between this year s and past year s usage, however, has not been determined. Idaho Power s meter test indicates that the customer s usage was accurately measured. There is no evidence that Idaho Power incorrectly billed the customer or failed to respond to the customer s concerns about her bill. The parties have attempted to reach an agreement informally and have been unable to do so. Staff recommends that the Commission not initiate a formal complaint. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to accept Ms. Bennett's request to file a formal complaint? Does the Commission have a sufficient record to rule on this issue if it declines to accept the formal complaint? Or, should a summons be issued? 9-J~0- Daniel Klein l:udmemos/dec mem bennett DECISION MEMORANDUM OCTOBER 31 , 2003