Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIPC-S-P-Sept-21-2012.pdfSummary: Idaho Power Co. Primary Credit Analyst: Michael T Ferguson, CFA, CPA, New York (1) 212-438-7670; michael_ferguson@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Gerrit W Jepsen, CFA, New York (1) 212-438-2529; gerrit_jepsen@standardandpoors.com Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research www.standardandpoors.com 1 © Standard & Poor's. All rights reserved. No reprint or dissemination without Standard & Poor’s permission. See Terms of Use/Disclaimer on the last page. 1014637 | 300642892 Summary: Idaho Power Co. Credit Rating:BBB/Stable/A-2 Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services bases its 'BBB' corporate credit rating on Idaho Power Co. (IPC) and its parent IDACORP Inc. on our view of the company's consolidated credit profile. This profile consists primarily of integrated regulated electric utility operations at IPC, and reflects an "excellent" business risk profile and "aggressive" consolidated financial risk profile under our corporate risk profile matrix. IPC's electric utility normally provides more than 99% of IDACORP's earnings and most of its consolidated cash from operations. IPC serves retail electric customers in Idaho and Oregon, which account for about 95% and 5% of regulated assets, respectively. We base our assessment of IDACORP's and IPC's business risk profile on their fully regulated monopoly utility operations, featuring both a low-cost hydroelectric generation base and a credit-supportive regulatory climate in Idaho. Hydro generation provides about one-half of total generation needs under normal water conditions, but we expect that the proportion will lessen as loads grow and as non-hydro-generating resources are added. The utility has some of the lowest average retail customer rates in the U.S. as a result of its abundant hydroelectric generation. This exposes the company to substantial replacement power price risk when low water flows lead to reduced generation, though the risk will partially abate with the 2012 completion of the Langley Gulch natural gas plant. Idaho regulators have authorized a robust power cost recovery mechanism to assist in absorbing variations and limiting financial exposure, and have granted the company a $60 million rate hike to pay for the Langley Gulch plant. IPC's revised annual power cost adjustment (PCA) mechanism in Idaho supports credit quality and reduces the undercollection of power costs. The most significant credit-supportive components of the annually filed Idaho PCA are a sharing provision that reduces the company's exposure to 5% of undercollected Non-Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) power costs and 0% of undercollected PURPA costs, and a forecast cost methodology designed to reduce deferrals and collection lag. In exceptionally low water years, deferrals can weaken cash flows and credit metrics, but Standard & Poor's generally views such collection delays as temporary because we anticipate that the company will collect more than 95% of costs above base rates over 12 months, with a carrying charge. The PCA has a long history of support and no instances of material disallowances. The aggressive financial risk profile of IDACORP and IPC reflects our view of low cash-flow-based credit metrics and above-average adjusted debt leverage, based on our indicative corporate financial ratios. Credit measures bottomed out in 2007, but have rebounded somewhat over the past few years because the company has taken steps to stabilize returns and bolster cash flows with updated base rates and a modified power cost mechanism. Slower expense growth, robust hydro output in the past few years, and tax benefits have also helped cash flows. We do not consider load loss stemming from the company's significant energy efficiency spending a significant risk due to a the revenue decoupling Standard & Poor’s | Research | September 20, 2012 2 © Standard & Poor's. All rights reserved. No reprint or dissemination without Standard & Poor’s permission. See Terms of Use/Disclaimer on the last page.1014637 | 300642892 mechanism that the IPUC approved in March 2012. This mechanism is also referred to as a fixed cost adjustment. For the 12 months ended June 30, 2012, IDACORP's consolidated adjusted funds from operations (FFO) to total debt was 13.0%, slightly lower than the previous year, as a result of decreased deferred taxes (We adjust credit metrics to include the debt equivalent of leases, purchased power obligations, and postretirement benefit obligations.) We believe that the company should maintain average adjusted FFO to debt of at least 12% to sustain the ratings but the ratio is likely to trend higher as pending rate cases take effect. The company's consolidated adjusted debt to total capitalization was 54.5% as of June 30, 2012. Adjusted debt leverage remains aggressive, while reported debt leverage declined to 48%. The company appears to be targeting a balanced unadjusted capital structure and has taken steps to maintain it, even while executing an ambitious capital investment program. We expect capital expenditures to decrease after the completion of Langley Gulch in 2012. Capital spending for the 12 months ended June 30, 2012, totaled $262 million, down from $357 million in the year preceeding June 30, 2011. If slow growth rates continue over the next few years, the size of IPC's planned capital expenditures and expected internal cash funding ability should increase cash flows, limiting the need for external capital. If major transmission proposals in the Northwest move forward, IDACORP may need more external equity to support the credit rating. Such investments are uncertain and are unlikely to occur until after 2013. Liquidity The short-term rating on IDACORP and IPC is 'A-2'. Liquidity is strong, based on an analysis of sources and uses, absent access to capital markets. Companies with strong liquidity should be able to withstand substantially adverse market circumstances over the next 24 months while still having sufficient liquidity to meet their obligations. Our analysis results in coverage that is above 1.5x for the upcoming 12 months. Even when measured over the next 24 months, it remains above 1x. On Oct. 26, 2011, IDACORP and IPC individually entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement. The credit agreements mature on Oct. 26, 2016, and provide as much as $125 million at IDACORP and $300 million at IPC. At June 30, 2012, IDACORP had no amounts outstanding under its credit facility and $53.7 million of commercial paper outstanding, and IPC had no amounts outstanding under its credit facility and $10 million of commercial paper outstanding. Each credit agreement contains a covenant requiring a leverage ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated total capitalization of no more than 65% at the end of each fiscal quarter. At June 30, 2012, IDACORP and IPC were compliant with all facility covenants. Recovery analysis We rate IPC's first mortgage bonds (FMB) 'A-', two notches higher than the issuer credit rating, with a recovery rating of '1+'. We assign recovery ratings to FMBs issued by U.S. utilities, and this can result in issue ratings being notched above the corporate credit rating on a utility, depending on the category and the extent of the collateral coverage. We base the investment-grade FMB recovery methodology the ample historical record of nearly 100% recovery for secured-bond holders in utility bankruptcies and our view that the factors that supported those recoveries (small size of the creditor class and the durable value of utility rate-based assets during and after a reorganization, given the essential service provided and the high replacement cost) will persist. Under our notching criteria, we consider the limitations of FMB issuance under the utility's indenture relative to the value of the collateral pledged to bondholders, management's www.standardandpoors.com 3 © Standard & Poor's. All rights reserved. No reprint or dissemination without Standard & Poor’s permission. See Terms of Use/Disclaimer on the last page.1014637 | 300642892 Summary: Idaho Power Co. stated intentions on future FMB issuance, and the regulatory limitations on bond issuance when assigning issue ratings to utility FMBs. FMB ratings can exceed a corporate credit rating on a utility by as much as one notch in the 'A' category, two notches in the 'BBB' category, and three notches in speculative-grade categories. IPC's collateral coverage of more than 1.5x supports a recovery rating of '1+' and an issue rating of 'A-', two notches above the corporate credit rating. Outlook The stable outlook reflects our expectation of sufficient operating cash flows to support financial measures that are adequate for the ratings, the ability to internally fund a significant portion of capital expenditures, and adequate management of regulatory relationships. In our base case we expect FFO to debt of 16% and debt to EBITDA of 4.7x in 2013, declining to 4.5x in 2014. We could lower the ratings if the company does not carefully manage costs and investments to ensure full recovery and the maintenance of credit measures, including FFO to debt of at least 12%. We could raise the ratings if the company is able to consistently achieve significantly stronger results, including adjusted FFO to debt of 20% or more and adjusted debt to capital of 50% or less, in addition to effectively managing regulatory relationships. However, we consider higher ratings to be unlikely in the near term, though we expect some credit improvement. Related Criteria And Research ·Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded, Sept. 18, 2012 ·Liquidity Descriptors For Global Corporate Issuers, Sept. 28, 2011 ·Analytical Methodology, April 15, 2008 Standard & Poor’s | Research | September 20, 2012 4 © Standard & Poor's. All rights reserved. No reprint or dissemination without Standard & Poor’s permission. See Terms of Use/Disclaimer on the last page.1014637 | 300642892 Summary: Idaho Power Co. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P’s opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Copyright © 2012 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC (S&P), a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. www.standardandpoors.com 5 1014637 | 300642892