20080317DSM 2007 Report.pdf

e;IDA~PO~
An IDACORP Company
BARTON L. KLINE
Senior Attorney
'lUl1\ì Mt\R \ I. Pt'\ 4: 39
, "'-,, ",' 'r'L\C
un~H~~~J ¿dl.kM\SstO\
March 14,2008 IPC-E-03-19
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
P. O. Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
Re: 2007 Demand-Side Management Annual Report
Dear Ms. Jewell:
Enclosed please find eight copies of Idaho Power Company's 2007 Demand-
Side Management Annual Report filed in compliance with Order No. 29419. If you have
any questions regarding the content of the report, please direct them to Pete Pengily at
388-2881 or feel free to contact Tim Tatum at 388-5515.
Very truly yours,ß;a:~
Barton L. Kline
BLK:sh
Enclosures
cc: Ric Gale
Maggie Brilz
Theresa Drake
Pete Pengily
P&RS/Legal Files
P.O. Box 70 (83707)
1221 W. Idaho St.
Boise, 10 B3702
RECE $SIDA~PO$ZIJ08 MAR 14 Pii4:40 An IDACORP company
Demand-Side Management
2007 Annual Report
IPC-E-03-19
.
"i'ae ¡..\. ,
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables .............................................................,............................................................................... iii
List of Figues ......... ................. ........... ........... .... .............. ............. ............... ...... ......... ............ ................... iv
Glossary of Terms................................................ ...................................,....................................................v
Preface......................................................................:................................................................................... i
Executive Summar ..... ............... ................ .................. ......................... ................................................... ...3
DSM Program Portfolio Strcture .......... .................. .............. ...... .... ................. ....... .............................4
Demand Response Programs ....... ...... .............. ................. ........ .......................... ........ .....................4
Energy Efficiency Programs ................................................,...........................................................5
Market Transformation ........ ........... .... ................ .... ......... .......... ........ ..............................................5
Other Programs and Activities.........................................................................................................5
Program Pedormance .........................,............................................................:.....................................5
Regulatory Initiatives ............... ........................... ............. .... ..................................... .... ......................... 7
DSM Expenditures and Funding................... ............. ...................... ...... ........... ...... .........................7
Futue Plans.......................................................................................................................... ........... 7
Customer Satisfaction ...... ................................................................... ........... ................. .................8
DSM Anual Report Strcture...............................................,.........................................................9
Residential Sector Overview......................................................................................................................10
Programs...................................................................................................................... ...................... ..1 0
Results...........................................................................................................:......................................1 0
Residential Sector Programs........................................:...................................................................... .12
AIC Cool Credit .............................................................................................................................12
Energy House Calls................................................................................ ......................................... .14
ENERGY STARCI Homes Northwest............................................................................................16
Oregon Residential Weatherization ...... ........................ .................... ..................... ....... .................18
Rebate Advantage ....... ............. ............... ................ .... ...................... ...... ............... ....... .................19
ENERGY STARCILighting .............................................................................................................2i
Weatherization Assistance for Qualified Customers.................................................................... .23
Heating and Cooling Efficiency........................................................................................:............25
Commercial/Industrial Sector Overview .................................................................................................. .26
Programs ................ ............. .................. .................. ......................................................................... ....26
Results..................................................................................................................................................27
Commercial/Industral Sector Programs.................................... .......................................................... .28
Annual Report 2007 Page i
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Building Efficiency............. .......... ...... ...................................... .....................................................28
Easy Upgrades. .............. ................................................... ......................... ............ ............ ............29
2008 Strategies...............................................................................................................................30
Oregon Commercial Audits .......................................... .... ............. ...... ..........................................31
Custom Efficiency .........................................................................................................................32
Irrgation Sector Overview ....................................................................................................................... .34
Programs ..............................................................................................................................................34
Results..................................................................................................................................................34
Irrgation Sector Programs ...................................................................................................................35
Irrgation Peak Rewards.................................................................................................................35
Irrgation Efficiency Rewards........................................................................................................37
Market Transformation .... ............ ...................................... ............ ...... ......... ........... ....... ... ........................39
Northwest Energy Effciency Allance (NEEA)..................................................................................39
NEEA Activities ......................,.....................................................................................................39
Industrial Effciency Alliance (lEA) Activities in Idaho.........................................................39
Commercial Alliance Activities in Idao ................................................................................39
Distribution Effciency Initiative .........................................,...................................................39
Residential NEEA Activities in Idaho .......... ...........................................................................40
Other NEEA Activities in Idaho ............................................................................,.................40
NEEA Funding...... ... ......................... ........................... ...................... ......... ......... ..........................40
Energy Effciency Advisory Group (EEAG) ..................................... ...... ................ ............ ......................42
EEAG Program Recommendations ........................................................... ........... .......... ..... .... ............42
Residential Programs ....................................................................... ...... ................ ........................42
Commercial and Industral Programs ............................................................................................43
Irrgation Programs ........................................................................................:...............................44
Local Energy Efficiency Funds (LEEF) ........................................................... .............................44
Other Programs and Activities...................................................................................................................45
Residential Energy Efficiency Education Initiative.............................................................................45
Activities ...............................................................~........................................................................45
Commercial Education Initiative .................................................;........................................................45
Local Energy Efficiency Funds (LEEF) ............................................. .............. ...................................45
Regulatory Initiatives.................................................................................................................................47
Fixed-Cost Adjustment Pilot................................................................................................................47
Performance- Based DSM Incentive Pilot............................................................................................47
Page..ji An Repo 207
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Enhanced Commitment to Energy Effciency and DSM.....................................................................4 7
Availability of Effciency and Load Management Programs ............... .........................................48
Building Code Improvement Activity ...........................................................................................48
Pursuit of Appliance Code Standards ..................... .... ....... .......................................................... ..49
Expansion ofDSM Programs Beyond Peak-Shavingl Load-Shifting Programs...........................49
Third-Part Verification.... .......... ...................... ............ ................ ................. ................................49
IPC's Internal Energy Effciency Commitment.............................................................................50
Appendices..................................................................................................................................................52
Appendix 1. Idaho Rider, Oregon Rider, BP A, and NEEA Funding Balances ......... .........................53
Appendix 2. 2007 DSM Expenses by Funding Source (Dollars) ...........................................,...........54
Appendix 3. 2007 DSM Program Activity .........................................................................................55
Appendix 4. Historical DSM Expenses and Pedormance 2001-2007...............................................57
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. 2007 DSM Programs, Sectors, and Operational Type ...............................................................6
Table 2. 2007 DSM Energy Impact ............................................................................,............................6
Table 3. 2007 Sector Comparison............................................................................................................7
Table 4. 2007 DSM Expenses and Energy Impact ................ ..................................................................7
Table 5. Residential Sector Direct Expenses and Ranked Energy Savings ...........................................1 1
Table 6. 2007 Residential Sector Demand Reduction (kW).........................................,.......................1 1
Table 7. Energy House Calls 2007 Activity and Energy Savings Summary ................ .........................15
Table 8. Rebate Advantage 2007 Activity and Energy Savings Summary ...........................................19
Table 9. ENERGY STARCI Lighting 2007 Program Summary .............................................................21
Table 10. Weatherization Assistance 2007 Year-End IPC Expenses ......................................................23
Table 11. Weatherization Assistance 2007 Year-End Energy Savings ...................................................24
Table 12. Commercial/Industral Sector Energy Savings (kWh) ............................................................27
Table 13. Commercial/Industral Sector Demand Reduction (kW).........................................................27
Table 14. 2007 Irrgation Program Summary, Energy Savings (kWh) and Demand Reduction
(kW).........................................................................................................................................34
Table 15. 2007 IPC DSM Program Targets and Results .........................................................................5.1
Annual Report 2007 Page iii
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. DSM Anual Expense History 2001-2007 ...............................................................................3
Figure 2. DSM Anual Energy Savings 2001-2007.................................................................................4
Figure 3. 2007 Direct Program Expense ...................................................................................................8
Figure 4. Customer Perception ofIPC's Conservation Efforts.................................................................9
Figure 5. 2007 Commercial/Industral Sector Direct Program Expense ................... ................ ..............26
Figure 6. 2007 Custom Efficiency Measures Annual Energy Savings (kWh)........................................33
Pageiv -AnuaRei2D7
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
aMW-Average Megawatt
akW-Average Kilowatt
A/C-Air Conditioning
ASHRAE-American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers
BCA-Building Contractors Association
BEEP-Building Owners and Managers Association's Energy Effciency Program
BETC-Business Energy Tax Credit
BLC-Basic Load Capacity
BOC-Boise Operations Center
BOMA-Building Owners and Managers Association
BP A-Bonnevile Power Administration
BSU-Boise State University
CAe-Central Air ConditioninglConditioners
CAP-Community Action Partership
CAP AI-Community Action Partership Association of Idaho, Inc.
CCOA-Canyon County Organization on Aging and Community Services
CCNO-Community Connection of Northeast Oregon, Inc.
CFL-Compact Fluorescent Lighting
CHQ-Corporate Headquarters (Idaho Power Company)
CRC-Conservation Rate Credit
DOE-U.S. Departent of Energy
DSM-Demand-Side Management
DSR--Delivery Service Representatives
EEAG-Energy Efficiency Advisory Group
EI-Ada-EI-Ada Community Action Partnership
EEBA-Energy and Environmental Building Association
EICAP-Eastern Idaho Community Action Partership
Energy Plan-Also known as Integrated Resource Plan
ETa-Energy Trust of Oregon
FCA-Fixed-Cost Adjustment
H&CE-Heating and Cooling Efficiency Program
HCSCS-Harney County Senior and Community Services Center
HMCAA-Harney-Malheur Community Action Agency
Annual Report 2007 Page v
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
HVAC-Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
HVR-Home Voltage Regulator
lEA-Industrial Effciency Allance
IECC-International Energy Conservation Code
IESBP-Idaho ENERGY STARCI Builders Partership
IPC-Idaho Power Company
IPUC-Idaho Public Utilities Commission
IRP-Integrated Resource Plan (or Energy Plan)
kvar-Kilovolt ampere reactive
kW-Kilowatt
kWh-Kilowatt-hour
LED-Light- Emitting Diode
LEED-Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
LEEF-Local Energy Efficiency Funds
LDL-Lighting Design Lab
MCOA-Malheur Council on Aging
MW-Megawatt
MWh-Megavvatt-hour
NEEM-Northwest Energy Effcient Manufactued Housing Program
NEEA-Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
NWPCC-Northwest Power and Conservation Council
OER--ffce of Energy Resources (formerly the Idaho Energy Division)
ODOE-Oregon Departent of Energy
OPUC-Public Utility Commission of Oregon
PECI-Portland Energy Conservation, Inc.
PLC-Power Line Carrer
PTCS-Performance Tested Comfort System
RFP-Request for Proposal
RTF-Regional Technical Forum
Rider-Idaho Energy Effciency Rider and Oregon Energy Efficiency Rider
SCCAP-South Central Community Action Partership
SEER-Seasonal Energy Effciency Ratio
SEICAA-Southeastern Idaho Community Action Agency
SWAT-Savings With A Twist
Page vi Annu Rep 207
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
USB-Utility Sounding Board
V-Volt
WAQC-Weatherization Assistance for Qualified Customers
Annual Report 2007 Page vii
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
PREFACE
Idaho Power Company's (IPC) Demand-Side
Management (DSM) 2007 Anual Report
.provides a review of the financial and
operational performance of IPC' s DSM
activities and initiatives for the 2007 calendar
year. These programs provide. a wide range of
opportities for all customer classes to balance
their energy needs with best practice energy
usage to minimize consumption.
Durng 2007, IPC continued to expand the
programs that began with the 2004 Integrated
Resource Plan (IRP), also known as the Energy
Plan. IPC's 2006 Energy Plan included the
addition of three new DSM programs and the
expansion of one program. In addition to the
DSM programs identified in the Energy Plan,
IPC has also continued to pursue other
customer-focused DSM initiatives, including
programs that preceded the 2004 Energy Plan,
educational opportnities, and regional market
transformation efforts. Also in 2007, as part of
new regulatory initiatives, IPC committed to
enhance its efforts towards promoting energy
effciency.
IPC'g DSM activities throughout 2007 focused
primarily on enhanced program partcipation
and energy savings in the curent programs, and
design and implementation of new programs.
IPC also continued to fuher integrate IPC field
and support personnel to better facilitate the
building of customer awareness and
participation in the programs.
This DSMAnual Report is prepared to report
on IPC' s DSM activities and finances
throughout 2007, to express IPC' s future plans
for DSM activities, and to conform to the Idaho
Public Utilities Commission's (IPVC) Order
No. 29419 and the Public Utility Commission of
Oregon's (OPUC) Order No. 89-507.
Annual Report 2007 Page 1
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Page 2 AnnualReplt 207
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Idaho Power Company (IPC) considers energy
effciency to be an important and necessary part
of a balanced approach to meeting the growing
demand for electrcity. Consistent with this
view, energy efficiency is one of the
cornerstones supporting IPC's resource
acquisition strategy. Energy effciency is
recognized by IPC and its customers as
. providing economic, operational, and
environmental benefits. Therefore, the pursuit of
all cost-effective demand-side resources is a
primary objective for IPC.
In 2007, the energy savings from ipe's DSM
activities increased by 29% and the expenditues
on DSM-related activities increased by 36%,
compared to 2006. This increase in spending
included existing programs and the development
of new programs that wil result in savings in
the futue. DSM activities throughout 2007 were
focused predominantly on increasing program
participation, customer education, and the
planning and implementation of the new
programs. IPC completed its third full year of
implementation of programs identified in the
2004 Energy Plan. It was also the second year of
program implementation of the DSM resources
identified in the 2006 Energy Plan.
Figures 1 and 2 show the historical growth in
expenditures and resource acquisition from
2001 to the present.
IPC's two main objectives for DSM programs
are to 1) acquire cost-effective resources in
order to more effciently meet the electrcal
system's needs, and 2) provide IPC's customers
with programs and information to help them
manage their energy and demand use and lower
their bils.
IPC achieves these objectives through the
development and implementation of programs
with specific energy, economic, and customer
satisfaction objectives. When possible, IPC
implements identical programs in its Idaho and
Oregon service areas.
IPC relies on input from the Energy Effciency
Advisory Group (EEAG) to provide customer
and public interest review of DSM programs. In
addition to the EEAG, IPC solicits fuher
customer input through stakeholder groups in
Figure 1. DSM Annual Expense History 2001-2007
$18.00
$16.00
$14.00..c:
~ $12.00i
I $10.00c:
l $8.00
lI $6.00!
$4.00
$2.00
$0.00
201 20 20
15.66 .
20 2005 20720
Annual Report 2007 Page 3
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Figure 2. DSM Annual Energy Savings 2001-2007
100.00
90.00
f 80.00
lI 70.000
IIC
~60.00
i-50.00II01C40.00iø:0 30.00
e'aic 20.00w
10.00
0.00
2001
91.17
200 200
the residential, irrgation, commercial, and
industrial customer sectors. IPC also has
enhanced relationships with trade alles, trade
organizations, and regional groups committed to
increasing the use of energy efficiency programs
and measures to reduce electricity load.
During 2007, IPC continued its contractual
participation in, and funding of, the Nortwest
Energy Effciency Allance (NEEA). NEEA's
efforts in the Northwest impact IPC's customers
by providing behind-the-scenes regional market
changes, as well as strctural support, to
transform IPC'slocal markets.
In March 2007, the Bonnevile Power
Administration's (BPA) Conservation Rate
Credit(CRC) program was suspended. IPC
continued to operate the programs formerly
funded with CRC fuds, including Energy
House Calls and Rebate Advantage, utilizing
Energy Effciency Rider (Rider) fuding.
DSM Program Portolio
Structure
The programs within the DSM portfolio are
offered to each of the four major customer
sectors: residential, commercial, industrial, and
20 200 200 2007
irrgation. In 2007, the commercial and
industral energy effciency programs were
made available to customers in either sector,
expanding the availability of these programs.
Because of this change, the sector is now often
referred to as the èommerciai/industral sector.
Programs are categorized by the operational
method through which the savings are realized:
Demand Response, Energy Effciency, Market
Transformation, and Other Programs and
Activities. A brief description of each of these
operational categories follows.
Demand Response Programs
Demand Response programs are designed to
reduce participant electricity loads at specific
times of the day and year when electricity is
normally in short supply and the cost to supply
electrcity is high. The goal of Demand
Response programs within IPC's DSM portfolio
is to reduce the system summer peak demand,
thus minimizing the need for acquiring higher
cost, supply side alternatives, such as gas
tubine generation or open market electricity
purchases. Demand Response is usually
achieved through the use of load control devices
installed on customer equipment. The measure
of program pedormance is the number of
kilowatts (kW) of reduced demand during peak
Page 4 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company
periods. IPC currently offers two Demand
Response programs: one offered to residential
customers and one offered to irrigation
customers.
Energy Efficiency Programs
Energy Effciency programs focus on reducing
energy usage through identifying buildings,
equipment, or components where energy
effcient design, replacement, or repair can yield
significant energy savings. These programs are
applicable to all customer sectors. Typical
project measures range from entire building
constrction to simple light bulb replacement.
Savings from these programs are measured in
terms of reduced kilowatt-hour (kWh) usage, or
megawatt-hour (MWh) usage for larger projects.
These programs usually supply energy benefits
throughout the year. ¡PC's Energy Effciency
offerings include programs in residential and
commercial new constrction, residential and
commercial retrofit applications, and irrgation
and industrial systems improvement or
replacement.
Market Transformation
Market Transformation is a method of achieving
energy savings through engaging and
influencing large national and regional
organizations. These organizations are in a
position to impact the design of energy usage in
products, services, and methods that affect
electrcal power consumption. IPC primarily
achieves Market Transformation savings
through its participation in NEEA.
Market transformation can also be accomplished
by appliance or building code modifications or
enforcement. In 2007, with IPC support, the
State of Idaho adopted the International Energy
Conservation Code (IECC) 2006 building codes
for both residential and commercial building.
Also in 2007, IPC conducted an appliance
standards study to analyze the energy
consumption impact ifIdaho were to adopt the
appliance standards curently in effect in
Oregon.
Demand-Side Management
Other Programs and Activities
Other Programs and Activities represents a wide
range of small projects that are tyically
research- and development-oriented. This
category includes the Local Energy Effciency
Funds (LEEF), formerly called the Small
Projects and Education Fund, the Residential
Energy Effciency Education Initiative, and the
Commercial Educational Initiative. These
programs enable IPC to offer support for
projects and educational opportities not
normally covered under existing programs.
Table 1 provides a summary of the DSM
programs and their respective sectors, as well as
operational category. and the state in which each
was available in 2007.
Program Performance
DSM programs at IPC continue to grow in
participation and energy impact in the form of
energy savings and demand reduction. In 2007,
participation in the A1C Cool Credit program
increased by 155%. The Irrgation Peak
Rewards and A1C Cool Credit programs
combined resulted in estimated. summer peak
reduction of 48 MW, which represented a 29%
increase over 2006 results. The four Energy
Efficiency programs that were identified in the
2004 Energy Plan were the Industral Efficiency
(Custom Efficien~y), Building Effciency,
ENERGY STAR Homes Northwest, and
Irrgation Efficiency Rewards programs. These
programs resulted in total anual savings of
45,540 MWh in 2007, which was a 20%
increase over the 2006 energy savings of
37,814 MWh for these programs.
The Energy Effciency programs that originated
as a result of the 2006 Energy Plan were the
Heating and Cooling Effciency,
ENERGY STARCI Lighting, and the Easy
Upgrades programs. These programs resulted in
annual savings of 12,393 MWh in 2007.
Annual Report 2007 Page 5
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Table 1. 2007 DSM Programs, Sectors, and Operational Type
Sector Operational Type State
Residential Demand Response 10
Commercial/Industrial Energy Efficiency ID/OR
Commercial Other Programs and Activities ID/OR
Commercial/Industrial Energy Effciency ID/OR
Commercial/Industrial Energy Efficiency ID/OR
Residential Energy Effciency ID/OR
Residential Energy Effciency ID/OR
Residential Energy Effciency ID/OR
Residential Energy Effciency 10
Irrigation Energy Efficiency ID/OR
Irrgation Demand Response ID/OR
All Other Programs and Activities 10
All Market Transformation ID/OR
Commercial Energy Effciency OR
Residential Energy Effciency OR
Residential Energy Effciency ID/OR
Residential Other Programs and Activities ID/OR
Residential Energy Efficiency ID/OR
An expansion of the program formerly known
as the Industrial Effciency program was also
identified in the 2006 Energy Plan and, as a
result, the program was expanded in 2007 and is
now called the Custom Efficiency program.
In addition to the Energy Plan programs offered
durng 2007, IPC operated several other energy
effciency programs targeting residential
customers: Weatherization Assistance for
Qualified Customers (WAQC), Energy House
Calls, Rebate Advantage, and Oregon
Residential Weatherization. These energy
effciency programs added annual savings of
4,602 MWh in 2007.
Additional significant energy savings continue
to be realized through market transformation
partnership activities with NEEA. NEEA
estimated that 28,601 MWh were saved in IPC's
service area during 2007.
Table 2 shows the 2007 annual energy savings,
summer peak demand reduction, and average
megawatt (aMW) savings associated with each
of the DSM program categories. Unless
otherwise noted, all energy savings presented in
this report are measured or estimated at the
customer's meter, excluding line losses.
Table 2. 2007 DSM Energy Impact
MWh
Peak
MW
48
9
Demand Response....................
Energy Effciency.......................
Market Transformation...............
Other Programs and Activities....
Total 2007
62,535
28,601
9
91,145 57
Table 3 provides a comparison of the 2007
contrbution of each sector in terms of weather
adjusted energy usage and its respective size in
number of customers.
Page 6 Annual Report2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Table 3. 2007 Sector Comparison
Residential...... ..
Commerci.al .......
Industrial............
Irrigation ............
Total
Normalized
MWh
5,109,692
3,897,540
3,450,318
1,693,785
14,151,334
%of
Energy
Usage
36%
28%
24%
12%
100%
Average
Number of
Customers
397,286
61,640
126
16,665
475,717
Please note that energy, demand, and expense
data have been rounded to the nearest whole
unit, which may result in minor rounding
differences.
Regulatory Initiatives
IPC has aligned itself with the IPUC and the
members of the environmental community to
work toward creating a financial and regulatory
environment supportive of utility DSM resource
acquisition. Resulting from this collaborative
effort are two financial mechanisms designed to:
1) remove the financial disincentives to utility
DSM resource acquisition; and 2) provide a
financial incentive to share owners when DSM
programs perform above baseline goals. IPC is
optimistic that this effort will lead to a sustained
environment supportive of its plans to pursue all
cost-effective DSM opportities while
balancing its shareowner's financial objectives.
In response to these regulatory mechanisms,
IPC has committed to enhancing its efforts
toward promoting DSM and energy effciency
in several key areas, including a broad
availability of effciency and load management
programs, building code improvement activity,
pursuit of appliance code standards, expansion
of DSM programs beyond peak shavinglload
shifting programs, and third-part verification.
DSM Expenditures
and Funding
Funding for DSM programs in 2007 came from
several sources. The Idaho Energy Efficiency
Rider and Oregon Energy Effciency Rider
funds are collected directly from customers on
their monthly bils at a rate of 1.5% of base rate
revenues, with monthly caps on residential and
irrgation customer contrbutions. IPC also
received fuds from the BP A, which until
March 2007 were provided through BPA's CRC
program. DSM-related expenses not fuded
through the Rider or BP A funds, including costs
for administration and overhead, are included as
part of IPC' s ongoing operation and
maintenance costs. Total DSM expenses fuded
from these sources were slightly under
$16 milion in 2007.
Table 4 provides a summary of the 2007
expenses and energy savings by each funding
category.
Table 4. 2007 DSM Expenses and Energy Impact
Idaho Rider Funded.......
Oregon Rider Funded....
SPA Funded...................
IPC Funded....................
Total 2007
Expenses
$13,487,4eO
$409,188
$200,686
$1,565,043
$15,662,378
MWh Savings
81,883
4,364
1,560
3,338
91,145
Figure 3 shows the relationships among the
2007 DSM program expenditures by operational
category. Direct program expenses include
customer incentives and other program-specific
costs. Administrative and overhead costs are
non-direct program expenses or costs not
directly attibutable to a specific program.
Future Plans
Many ofIPC's DSM programs are selected for
implementation through its biennial Energy
Plan. The Energy Plan is a public document that
details IPC's strategy for economically
maintaining the adequacy of its power system
into the future. The Energy Plan process
balances risk, environmental, economic, and
other considerations in developing a preferred
portfolio of futue resources that meet the
specific energy needs of IPC and its customers.
Annual Report 2007 Page 7
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
The Energy Plan is normally updated every two
years to reflect changes in supply costs, demand
for electricity, and other factors; however, the
next full Energy Plan is scheduled to be
completed in June of2009. An update to the
2006 plan wil be complete in June of 2008. IPC
DSM staff wil be part of the collaborative team
compiling both the 2006 Energy Plan Update
and the 2009 Energy Plan.
Figure 3. 2007 Direct Program Expense
6% 1%
. Demand Respose
. . Energy Effciency
. Market Transformation
. Otr Prorams and Activites
Total Diret Proram Expenses
Administration and Overead
$4,042,035
$9,829,557
$893,340
$131,885
$14,89,817
$765,561
$15,66378
In 2008, IPC plans to continue to increase
participation and energy savings from existing
programs, continue to implement new energy
effciency programs, research possible new
demand response programs, complete a new
DSM potential study, and evaluate several
existing programs. IPC will participate in the
development of the Northwest Power and
Conservation Council's (NWPCC) Sixth Power
Plan, continue and enhance consumer education
on energy efficiency, and complete various
research and development projects.
Customer Satisfaction
Customer satisfaction is a key consideration in
IPC's program design, operations, and
management. IPC utilizes sureys, focus groups,
stakeholder input, and input from the EEAG and
IPC field personneL. This information and input
is used durng the design and modification
phases of program development and throughout
each program's life.
The Easy Upgrade program provides an
ongoing, Web-based customer surey for its
participants. The results of these sureys
indicate a general satisfaction with this program
and helps guide marketing efforts.
In early 2007, the WAQC program began
receiving satisfaction surveys from participating
customers. The results of this survey showed
that customers thought this program helped
them save energy, money, and educated them on
energy savings ideas.
An important measure of customer satisfaction
is the retention rate of ongoing programs. The
Irrgation Peak Rewards program has consistent
participation in the number of customers and the
number of service points since the program's
inception three years ago in 2005. Durng 2007,
the A1C Cool Credit program experienced high
customer retention, indicated through the low
program atttion rate of less than 1%, due to
factors other than customer relocation.
Results of IPC' s quarterly Customer
Satisfaction Survey have shown steady
improvement over recent years as the percent of
customers who have a positive perception of
IPC's energy conservation efforts has continued
to increase. Customers' positive perception of
IPC's conservation efforts increased from 39%
in early 2003 to 50% in late 2007, which is an
11 percentage point increase. This represents a
28% increase in positive customer perception.
IPC continues to expand its customer
satisfaction measurement activities to identify
actionable areas of improvement.
Figure 4 depicts biannual growth in the number
of customers who indicated IPC met or
Page 8 Anm.ialRepor 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Figure 4. Customer Perception of IPC's Conservation Efforts
60%
50%
39%
43%
40%~44%46%47%47%45%
50%457
40%-
30%
20%
10%
0%
Qtr2
2003
Qtr4
203
Qtr2
200
Qtr420 Qtr 2
205
Qtr4
2005
Qtr 2
2006
Qtr4
2006
Qtr2
2007
Qtr4
2007
exceeded their needs in regard to energy
conservation efforts encouraged by IPC.
including the Fixed-Cost Adjustment and
Performance- Based Incentive pilots.
Several programs, including NC Cool Credit,
Energy House Calls, Rebate Advantage, and
Building Effciency, were developing customer
sureys late in 2007. These surveys wil be
implemented in 2008. Survey results wil
measure customer satlsfaction and provide
guidance when futue modifications to programs
are considered.
DSM Annual Report Structure
The strcture of the first section of this report is
based on customer sectors (categorized by
residential, commercial/industrial, and
irrgation). The write-up for each sector contains
information about the specific programs unique
to that sector. Following the sector write-ups are
descriptions ofIPC's activities in Market
Transformation, Other Programs and Activities,
and IPC's recent Regulatory Initiatives,
Annual Report 2007 Page 9
Demand-Side Management
RESIDENTIAL SECTOR
OVERVIEW
Residential customers represent IPC's largest
customer segment with over 400,000 accounts
at the end of 2007, serving approximately
one millon people. Growth within this segment
slowed slightly in 2007 compared to recent
years. The number of residential customers in
2007 grew by approximately 2%, adding more
than 7,000 customers. The residential sector
represents approximately 36% of total system
energy sales.
Programs
Programs available to residential customers
include one demand response program, seven
energy efficiency programs, and an educational
initiative. program. The demand response
offering is the A1C Cool Credit program, which
achieves peak demand reduction by cycling
customers' central air conditioners. The
residential energy efficiency programs include
Energy House Calls, ENERGY STAR CI Homes
Northwest, Oregon Residential Weatherization,
Rebate Advantage, ENERGY STARCI Lighting,
W AQC, and Heating and Cooling Effciency.
New in 2007 was the Residential Energy
Efficiency Education Initiative, which provided
educational outreach to IPC residential
customers. Additionally, new programs under
development in 2007 were the Heating and
Cooling Effciency program and the Appliance
program.
IPCconducted approximately 20 regional
events in partnership with local community
retailers to educate and influence consumer
purchasing decisions relating to ENERGY
STARCI Lighting. IPC increased residential
program outreach efforts in 2007 through
parterships with Home Depot, Lowes,
Wal-Mart, and other retailers. These
parnerships were developed to educate
customers across IPC's service area about
Idaho Power Company
energy effcient lighting and increase the
adoption of energy effcient lighting by
residential customers.
Another addition in 2007 was the creation of the
ww.getpluggedin.com Web site and related
radio and TV advertising. These marketing
chanels were designed to educate customers
about various issues facing IPC, and
specifically, energy efficiency and the role it
plays in planning and managing growth.
Results
In 2007, the residential sector was responsible
for a 10% increase in energy savings from 2006
with 11,293,798 kWh savings in 2006 and
12,440,682 kWh in 2007. The peak demand
savings from this sector increased by 74% from
6.5 MW in 2006 to 11.4 MW in 2007.. Customer
paricipation in the demand response programs
increased by 155% for 2007, and compact
fluorescent light (CFL) bulb sales increased
by 23%.
Table 5 summarizes the residential sector's
expenses and energy savings for 2007. Table 6
shows the residential sector demand reduction.
Page 10 Annual Rep 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Table 5. Residential Sector Direct Expenses and Ranked Energy Savings
Expenses Energy Savings
Residential Sector Programs
ENERGY STARII Lighting.....................................
WAQC-ID...........................................................
Energy House Calls..............................................
ENERGY STARII Homes Northwest....................
Rebate Advantage................................................
WAQG-OR..........................................................
Oregon Weatherization.........................................
Heating and Cooling Effciency.............................
Appliance Program...............................................
Total
2007 Direct
Expenses
$557,646
$1,292,930
$336,372
$475,044
$89,269
$30,694
$3,781
$488,211
$9,275
$3,283,222
% of 2007
Expenses
14.5%
39.4%
10.2%
17.0%
2.7%
0.9%
0.1%
14.9%
0.3%
100.0%
2007 Energy
Savings
(kWh)
7,207,439
3,296,019
699,899
629,634
554,018
42,108
9,971
1,595
o
12,440,682
% of 2007
Energy
Savings
57.8%
26.4%
5.6%
5.3%
4.4%
0:1.0%
0:1.0%
0:1.0%
0:1.0%
100.0%
Table 6. 2007 Residential Sector Demand
Reduction (kW)
Summer
akW Peak kW
10,762
80
76 606
823
AlC Cool Credit.............................
Appliance Program........................
Energy House Calls.......................
ENERGY STARII Homes
Northwest......................................
ENERGY STARII Lighting .............
Heating and Cooling Efficiency.....
Oregon Residential
Weatherization............................. .
Rebate Advantage....... .... ....... .......
WAQC--ID....................................
WAQC-OR..................................
Total
63
376
5
1,425 11,368
Annual Report 2007 Page 11
Demand-Side Management
Residential Sector
Demand Response Program
AlC Cool Credit
air
Description
. AlC Cool Credit is a voluntar program for
residential customers. Originally developed as a
pilot program in 2003 and 2004, the program
was selected in the. 2004 Energy Plan for
implementation in 2005. The program, through
the use of communications hardware and
softare, enables IPC to cycle participants'
central air conditioners on and off via a direct
load-control device installed on the air
conditioning unit. Participants receive a
monthly, monetary incentive for participating in
the program during the summer season. This
program enables IPC to directly reduce system
peaking requirements during times when
summer system demand is high. In 2007, the
program was available in Ada County, Canyon
County, and the Emmett valley.
Cycling of air conditioning units is achieved
through the use of either individual radio-
controlled or power line carrer (PLC) switches
installed on customer air conditioning
equipment. Thes~ switches cycle customer air
conditioners using a schedule initiated on the
day before, or the day of, a cycling event. Under
Idaho Power Company
this program, IPC may cycle participants' air
conditioners for up to 40 hours each month for
the months of June, July, and August.
I~ 2007, marketing efforts were' significantly
increased in both the quantity and frequency of
mailings. A number of improvements in
developing target lists, updating program
materials, and tracking campaigns were made
over the course of the year. Response rates
ranged from less. than 1 % to over 6%,
depending on the time of year and the area.
Spring and early summer saw the highest
response rates. There were also higher response
rates in Eagle and North Boise.
An important activity in 2007 was building
relationships with the heating, ventilation, and
air conditioning (HVAC) community. IPC staff
attended the Idaho State HV AC Association
monthly meetings and several meetings with
individual HV AC companies. This has been
beneficial in creating an educated awareness of
the program and minimizing the amount of
unauthorized switch disconnects.
Two mitigation projects occurred prior to the
start of the cycling season. The first incident
that required mitigation involved an installer
whose work did not match what was reported.
A plan to correct the problem was put in place
when it was discovered. Quality checks were
completed on all service calls completed by the
installer. The vendor responsible increased
resources to prevent interference with normal
production plans. In total, 2,786 sites were
visited.
The second incident involved a radio signal
intended for a limited number of switches that
was accidentally received by all the switches,
causing some to become inactive. The basis of
the problem was determined, and a plan w~s put
into place to correct the issue and prevent it
from happening in the future. Each switch
required a physical. visit to reset and download
information. This involved servicing over
7,000 switches.
Page 12 Annual Repor 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Due to the above issues, many switches were
not operable for cycling at the start of June. In
both cases, the vendors mitigated the problems.
The unintended benefit of checking nearly all of
the radio-controlled switches was that
verification of these units was completed in a
comprehensive way in a very short period of
time.
Results
Participation
Program participants increased from 5,369 in
2006 to13,692 by the end of2007. This total
included 236 participating customers in the
Emmett valley using the PLC system.
Installations occurred year-round in 2007, a
result ofthe ongoing, direct-mail campaigns. As
expected, enrollments and installations were
lower during the non-summer months.
As enrollments declined due to the end of
summer and the start of cooler weather, an
alternative marketing effort was implemented.
A marketing door hanger was placed at
approximately ten (10) homes near each new
A1C Cool eredit installation, resulting in an
increase of 1.6% new sign-ups for the program.
Demand Impact
The estimated demand reduction in July 2007
was 10.8 MW, a substantial increase over
5.6 MW achieved in 2006. Cumulative savings
for customers enrolled. by year-end are expected
to provide an estimated 15 MW. Although
cycling appears to shift some usage from
cycling hours to non-cycling hours, the net
effect on kWh usage is negligible. IPC initiated
19 load-control events between June 20 and
August 30, 2007. The majority of control events
were four hours in duration at a 50% cycling
rate. However, when the temperature was
forecasted to be 100 degrees or more, IPC
cycled at a 33% rate to minimize customer
discomfort and reduce potential paricipant
atttion.
2008 Strategies
The 2008 A1C Cool Credit target is 16,000 new
participants. Since the target for 2007 was
approximately 12,000 new paricipants and
there were approximately 8,300 new
participants last year, this results in the need to
car over the shortage of approximately 5,000
partcipants into the 2008 sign-up target.
IPC wil continue to manage and monitor the
performance of the installation contractors to
ensure that customer satisfaction with the
program remains high as the number of
installations increases. As IPC increases its
marketing efforts in 2008, additional trained
installers wil be used to support the increased
participation targets.
Annual Report 2007 Page 13
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Energy House Calls
Description
Originally launched asa pilot in 2002, the
Energy House Calls program provides duct
sealing and additional efficiency measures to
IPC customers living in manufactued homes.
Due to the suspension of BP A funding in 2007,
this program was funded by the BP A the first
half of 2007 and by Rider funds the remainder
oftheyear.
Funds cover the participants' costs and include
the following services and products: duct testing
and sealing according to Performance Tested
Comfort System (PTCS) specifications endorsed
by the BP A, installation of five CFL bulbs,
provision of two fuace filters along with
replacement instrctions, water heater
temperatue test for proper setting, and
distrbution of energy efficiency educational
materials for manufactued home occupants.
Program management is under contract with
Ecos Consulting, a company with experience in
managing and supplying duct-sealing service
programs. This company coordinates providers
performing local weatherization and energy
efficiency services. Quality assurance is
conducted by third-part audits.
Results
Significant energy savings were realized during
2007, the fifth full year of operation for this
program. The number of CFL bulbs installed in
each home increased from three to five,
generating even greater energy savings.
Participation
Participation in this program exceeded
projections for 2007. IPC continued to focus on
recruiting rural customers and those living in
colder climates. This focus represented a shift
from the initial program target sector of
customers concentrated in communities of
manufactured homes. The shift in focus to
decentralized, rural manufactured housing units
required increased marketing effort and travel
time per housing unit.
In the past, new participants were recruited via
IPC bil stuffers, Customer Connection
newsletters, newspaper advertisements, and
field contractors. In 2007, IPC utilized a direct-
mail program targeted to customers on IPC's
customer information system whose house-tye
data indicated a mobile or manufactured home.
An analysis was conducted to fuher segment
this population into potential electrically-heated
homes based on energy use during winter
months. Response rates to this campaign have
been significant, far exceeding prior marketing
efforts.
Energy Impact
The annual energy savings increased by 13%
over the previous year, from 333,494 kWh in
2006 to 699,899 kWh in 2007. The primary
source of savings from the program came from
increasing the customers' effciency of their
heating systems through improving air delivery
from furnaces through the duct systems.
Improved delivery through.duct systems also
Page 14 AnnuaJReport200ì
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
provided energy savings associated with cooled
air where applicable.
The program's fuace fiter and water
temperature evaluation services educate the
occupants on maintaining energy effcient
practices in the futue. Energy impact of these
measures is not quantified or included in the
total energy impact of the program.
Table 7 summarizes 2007 program service
activity for Idaho and Oregon customers.
Table 7. Energy House Calls 2007 Activity and
Energy Savings Summary
Idaho Oregon Total
Activity
Test Only........................72 10 82
Test and Seal.................643 24 667
Total Duct Measur'es 715 34 749
CFL Bulbs.......................3,515 175 3,690
Furnace Filters..... ...........1,252 63 1,315
Total Other Measures 4,767 238 5,005
Water Temperature
(Average)........................128 127 128
Energy Savings kWh..........674,399 25,500 699,899
2008 Strategies
In mid-2007, IPC assessed thé market satuation
level of this program to determine whether or
not to continue Energy House Calls into 2008.
IPC identified a significant number of qualified
homes in the service area that can benefit from
this program. IPCplans to continue the program
for the full year in 2008 and focus greater
efforts on urban areas.
Another change for 2008 is an improvement in
how information is left with customers receiving
an Energy House CalL. Instead of numerous
loose papers, they wil now receive a packet of
materiaL. The leave-behind information educates
customers on services pedormed and ways they
can conserve energy.
Annual Report 2007 Page 15
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
ENERGY STAR(R Homes
Northwest
Description
The ENERGY STARCI Homes Northwest
program is a regionally coordinated initiative
supported by a partership of IPC, NEEA, and
the State of Idaho Office of Energy Resources
(OER) to improve energy effcient constrction
practices for single-family homes.
Selected for implementation in the 2004 Energy
Plan, the program's goal is to encourage the
purchase of homes that are 20% more energy
effcient than homes built to standard Idaho
residential code. This program specifically
targets the reduction of peak summer demand.
This is accomplished by increasing the
efficiency of residential building envelope
constrction practices, air conditioning
equipment, and air delivery.
In 2007, the program offered a $750 incentive
per qualifying home to participating builders
and a $1,000 incentive for Parade of Homes
units. Program activities included program
management services, coordination of local
parterships between ¡PC, builders, and real
estate service providers, education and training
activities for residential new constrction
industr parters, and consumer marketing
communications conveying the benefits of
ENERGY STARCI Homes.
Results
In 2007, the number of active ENERGY STARCI
builders increased from 119 to 132. However, as
a result of the housing downtu in the Treasure
Valley, the number of certified ENERGY
STARCI Homes in 2007 was 303, down from
439 homes in 2006.
IPC was instrmental in the formation of the
Idaho ENERGY STARCI Builders Partnership
(IESBP), comprised of builders committed to
building exclusively 100% ENERGY STARCI
homes. In 2007, IPC co-sponsored a cooperative
marketing campaign with IESBPand Northwest
ENERGY STARCI. This campaign consisted of
print advertising, radio, and a 100% ENERGY
STARCI tour of homes.
Participation
While builder participation increased, the
number of certified homes fell short of the level
needed to meet the 2004 Energy Plan energy
target of 1,414,166 kWh or 681 homes for 2007.
Nearly 90% of the ENERGY STARCI Homes
completed were built in the Treasure Valley.
The program's estimated market share in 2007
was approximately 5% of the total single- family
housing starts in IPC's service area, which is a
slight increase over 2006.
Energy Impact
Annual energy savings in 2007 were
629,634 kWh as compared to 912,242 kWh
savings in 2006. The demand reductìon in 2007
was 606 kW, and in 2006 it was 878 kW. This
decrease in both energy and demand savings can
be contributed to the downturn in the housing
market.
page 16 Annual Repo 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
2008 Strategies
In 2008, the incentive for builders wil change.
The 2006 International Energy Conservation
Code (IECC), which the State of Idaho has
adopted as its standard building code, took
effect January 1,2008. This new code meets.
ENERGY STARCI Homes Northwest program
standards in several key areas, which decreases
the incremental energy savings of each
ENERGY STARCI Home. As a direct result of
the upgrade in Idaho code and the resulting
reduction of energy savings, IPC has reduced
the incentive to $400 in 2008, down from the
$750 incentive previously offered. Incentives
for Parade of Homes units remain unchanged.
Based on curent market conditions, IPC' s
target for 2008 is to complete 380 certified
ENERGY STARCINorthwest Homes. In order
to achieve this target IPC plans to increase
awareness of the program, especially outside the
Treasure Valley. IPC wil continue to provide
realtor trainings, support Parade of Homes
events, support Building Contractors
Association (BCA) and realtor associations,
improve distrbution of marketing materials, and
continue to support the IESBP group and their
activities.
Annual Report 2007 Page 17
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Oregon Residential
Weatherization
Description
IPC offers free energy audits for electrcally
heated homes of customers within the Oregon
service area. Upon request, an IPC
representative visits the home to analyze it for
energy effciency. An estimate of costs and
savings for specific measures is given to the
customer. IPC offers financial assistance for a
portion of the costs for weatherization measures,
either as a cash incentive or with a 6.5% interest
loan.
Results
Participation
In 2007, a total of35 Oregon customers
responded to an informational brochure about
energy audits and home weatherization
financing in 2007. Each of the 35 customers
returned a card from the brochure indicating
they were interested in a home energy audit,
weatherization loan, or cash payment.
Twenty-two audits and responses to customer
inquiries to the program were completed.
Five customer responses were directed to
Cascade Natural Gas, and eight follow-up calls
to customers had no response.
Energy Impact
One of the 2007 audit participants chose to
implement energy-saving measures during the
year. This customer requested a loan for $1,808
to pay for ceiling and floor insulation used in
the home. Annual energy savings from this
program equaled 9,971 kWh.
Page 18 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Rebate Advantage
Program Ove
Target Customers...........Residential buyers of new
manufactured homes
... ....2003-0ngoing
Description
The Rebate Advantage program encourages
manufactued home buyers to purchase energy
effcient Super Good CentsCI and later ENERGY
STARCI manufactued homes. Effective
October 1, 2007, IPC began providing
incentives only on ENERGY STARCI-certified
manufactured homes.
Rebate Advantage promotes and educates
buyers and retailers of manufactued homes
about the benefits of owning energy effcient
models, and offers financial incentives.
Customers who purchase an ENERGY STARCI
home and site it in IPC's service area are
eligible for a $500 incentive. In addition,
salespersons receive a $100 incentive for each
qualified home sold.
Quality control and energy efficiency
specifications for qualified homes are
established by the Northwest Energy Effcient
Manufactured Housing (NEEM) program.
NEEM is a consortium of manufacturers and
state energy offices in the Northwest. In
addition to specifications and quality control,
Demand-Side Management
NEEM tracks the production and on-site
pedormance of ENERGY STARCI homes.
The license to use the Super Good CentsCI
designation in the Pacific Northwest was
discontinued as of September 30,2006. Initially,
BP A funding guidelines directed that, effective
October 1, 2006, new homes must be
manufactued under ENERGY STARCI
standards. Subsequent to this decision, BP A and
IPC decided to also accept the following homes
for credit until September 30,2007:
manufactured homes certified by NEEM as
Super Good CentsCI, and manufactued homes
sold as Super Good CentsCI homes prior to
October 1, 2006 that subsequently receive the
NEEM-certified designation.
Results
Participation
In 2007, there were 123 homes sold under this
program, compared to 102 homes in 2006. The
geographic reach of this program, as seen in
Table 8, shows 19% of the total homes
participating were in IPC"s Oregon servjce area.
Approximately one-third of all manufactured
home dealers with sales in IPC's service area
are paricipating in the program.
Table 8. Rebate Advantage 2007 Activity and
Energy Savings Summary
Idaho Oregon Total
Activity
Homes.........................99 24 123
Towns with 48 9 57
Homes Sited...............
Counties with 21 3 24
Homes Sited...............
Salespeople(1)............ .30 13 N/A
Dealers(1) ....................19 9 N/A
Manufacturers(1) .........12 7 N/A
Energy Savings kWh......465,882 88,196 554,018
(1) Some sales groups sell in both Idaho and Oregon.
Annual Report 2007 Page 19
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Energy Impact
The annual energy savings increased by 66%
over the previous year, from 333,494 kWh in
2006 to 554,018 kWh in 2007. Savings from
this program are largely due to improvements in
the shell of the home, resulting in more efficient
use of heating and cooling resources.
Manufacturers have some flexibility in how they
achieve a more efficient shell; however, a
common attrbute of all homes in the program is
a sealed-duct delivery system.
2008 Strategies
The 2008.target for this program is 150 certfied
homes. To accomplish this target, IPC wil
increase outreach to manufactued home
dealers. A new brochure is being developed to
assist manufactued home dealers in promoting
ENERGY STARI! manufactured homes and
IPC's Rebate Advantage program to their
customers.
Page 20 AnnuaRepørt2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
ENERGY STAR(ILighling
Description
The ENERGY STARCI Lighting program is
designed to achieve residential energy savings
through the replacement of less effcient lighting
with more effcient technology. The average
older home has 38 light bulbs. New homes have
an average of 77 light bulbs. Changing these
bulbs represents a low-cost, easy way for all
customers to achieve energy savings.
In 2007, the majority of energy savings were
achieved through ipe's participation in three
regional Change.A Light promotions sponsored
by the BP A. Additional energy savings were
achieved from carrover from the 2006 Savings
With A Twist (SWAT) promotion and limited
direct-install opportnities. Table 9 describes
the energy savings and the number of CFL bulbs
contrbuted to each segment of the program.
Table 9. ENERGY ST AR(! Lighting 2007 Program
Summary
Current Programs
Savings 'Nith A Twist(1) ..............
Change A Light Spring...............
, Change A Light Fall Spiral... ......
Change A Light Fall Specialty....
Light Bulb Direct-Install ..............
Total
kWh Energy # of CFL
Savings Bulbs
186,468
3,263,141
3,420,154
258,431
79,245
7,207,439
5,685
99,486
104,273
7,879
2,416
219,739
(1) 2006 carrover
Results
Energy Impact
ENERGY STARCI Lighting program activities
in Idaho and Oregon resulted in the installation
of219,739 CFLs for a savings of 7,207 MWh as
compared to 6,302 MWh in 2006. In 2007,
Idaho's portion included the'installation of
213,652 CFLsfor a savings of7,007 MWh,
while Oregon's portion consisted of the
installation of 6,087 CFLs and a savings of
200MWh.
BP A has calculated the energy impact of a CFL
at 32.8 kWhlbulb for its CRC program. This is a
regional average based on the wattage
difference between the incandescent and CFL
bulb, adjusted for heating impact, market
saturation rates, and hours of operation.
Although the BP A-CRC program was
suspended mid-year, the Oregon portion of the
spring Change a Light program was financed
with CRC funds.
Customer Satisfaction
In 2007, IPC developed a strategy to address
custonier concerns recognizing the role of state
and federal health and environmental
professionals in regard to risks posed by
mercur in CFLs. IPC informs customers of the
presence of mercur in bulbs and directs them to
the primary sources of environmental and health
information for specific questions related to
disposal, risk, and management.
Annual Report 2007 Page 21
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Cost continues to be a market barrer with
off-promotion CFLs priced at $2 to over $6 in
the marketplace.
2008 Strategies
ipC wil continue to promote ENERGY STARCI
Lighting in 2008 through participation in
regional lighting promotions and customer
education, while exploring new projects to
promote energy efficient lighting.
IPC wil provide customer education through
in-store events, targeting education efforts on
new bulb applications and emerging advances in
ENERGY STARCI lighting, including both CFL
and light-emitting diode (LED) technologies.
Additionally, IPC wil explore new programs
for ENERGY STARCI fixtues and ceiling fans,
and a light bulb program for smaller, rual
retailers.
Page 22 Annual Repo 2007
Idaho Power Company
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Weatherization Assistance
for Qualified Customers
Description
The W AQe program has been operating since
1989. The.program provides fuding for the
installation of cost-effective weatherization
measures in qualified owner-occupied and rental
homes that are electrcally heated.
Enhancements enable low-income families to
maintain a comfortable home environment,
while saving energy and money otherwise spent
on heating, cooling, and lighting.
WAQC is modeled after the U.S. Departent of
Energy (DOE) Weatherization Program. The
DOE program is managed through Health and
Human Services offices in Idaho and by the
Oregon Housing and eommunity Services in
Oregon.
IPC serves as the administrator ofWAQC in
conjuncti~ with Community Action '
Partership (CAP) agencies in the IPC service
area. Federal funds are allocated to the Idaho
Departent of Health and Welfare and the
Oregon Housing and Community Services, then
to CAP agencies based upon U.S. Census data
Demand-Side Management
of qualifying household income within each
CAp agency's geographic area. The CAP
agencies oversee local weatherization crews and
contractors providing implementations that
improve energy efficiency of the home"s.
Table 10 provides a summary ofWAQC IPC
2007 expenses.
Table 10. Weatherization Assistance 2007
Year-End IPC Expenses
2007
Projects Expenses
IPC Payments
CAP Agencies(1)
CCOA.............................
EI-Ada............................
EICAP.............................
SCCAP...........................
SEICAA..........................
10 Total
MCOA-OR...................
HCSCS-OR.................
CCNO-OR...................
OR Total
Total CAP Agencies
Non-Profit Projects
Non-Profits-I D ...............
Non-Profis-OR .............
Total Non-Profit
Total IPC Payments
IPC Administration(2)
TotaliPC Program Expense
(1) See Glossary for Community Action Partnership (CAP)
definitions.
(2) Includes BPA funding of $28,035 for 2007.
Results
120 $355,071
159 $473,288
6 $12,788
65 $171,830
47 $111,604
397 $1,124,581
9 $23,019
0 $0
2 $5,869
11 $28,887
408 $1,153,468
0 $75,760
0 $0
0 $75,760
408 $1,229,228
$94,395
$1,323,624
Participation
Durng 2007, Idaho CAP agencies weatherized
391 electrcally heated homes and six buildings
housing nonprofit agencies providing assistance
to special-needs customers. Oregon CAP
agencies weatherized 11 homes. In 2007, the
Annual Report 2007 Page 23
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
W AQC program completed a total of
408 weatherization jobs.
Energy Impact
The annual energy savings increased by 13%
over the prior year, to 3,338,126 kWh in 2007 as
compared to 2,958,024 kWh savings in 2006.
Table 11 provides W AQC 2007 energy savings.
Table 11. Weatherization Assistance 2007
Year-End Energy Savings
kWh Savings for 2007
CAP Agencies
CCOA.............................
EI-Ada ...........................
EICAP............................
SCCAP...........................
SEICAA..........................
10 Total
MCOA-OR...................
HCSCS-OR..................
CCNO-OR...................
OR Total
Total CAP Agencies
Non-Profit Projects
Non-Profis-ID ...............
Non-Profits-OR .............
Total Non-Profit
Total kWh Savings
1,304,375
1,181,873
20,525
286,709
203,916
2,997,399
25,921
o
16,187
42,108
3,039,507
298,619
o
298,619
3,338,126
Customer Satisfaction
In 2007, the W AQC program received
satisfaction surveys. from customers whose
homes had been weatherized through the
program. Customers were asked how much they
thought the weatherization had improved the
comfort of their home. Seventy-three percent of
the respondents replied that they thought the
improvements helped. Fifty-one percent of the
respondents also thought that weatherization
would reduce futue bills, and 93% reported
having tred energy-saving ideas in their home.
2008 Strategies
IPC staffwil continue'to work with Idaho
Department of Health and Welfare, Oregon
Housing and Community Services, CAP AI, and
individual CAP agency management and staff to
coordinate services and monitor the program to
best serve special-needs customers. '
Page 24 AnnualReprt 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Residential Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Heating and Cooling
Efficiency
Description
The Heating and Cooling Efficiency (H&CE)
program began in September 2007. The
objectives of this program are to acquire kWh
savings and reduce summer peak demand
through the implementation of energy-saving
HV AC measures in the residential sector. Cash
incentives are provided to residential customers
and HV AC contractors who install eligible
central air conditioners (CAC),heat pumps, and
evaporative coolers. Incentives are awarded for
qualifying heat pump tue-ups and CAC
tune-ups meeting IPC's program specifications.
All work must be performed by a participating
HVAC company.
The H&CE program is available to IPC
customers in Idaho and requires contractors to
become "participating" companies who must
sign an agreement with IPC. The participating
companies must ensure their service technicians
and installers attend required training on the
proper installation of air conditioners and heat
pumps. These companies must purchase and use
TrueFlow™ Meters to measure air flow, and
adhere to program specifications.
Durng fall 2007, IPC sponsored classes on the
proper sizing of equipment and over
200 technicians attended these classes.
Results
Four customer incentives were processed in
2007, resulting in a total energy savings of
1,595 kWh.
2008 Strategies
In 2008, IPC plans to increase awareness and
participation in the program by implementing a
comprehensive marketing/advertising strategy,
and by increasing the number of contractors
properly sizing and installing heating and
cooling equipment.
Annual Report 2007 Page 25
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
COMM ERCIAL/I N DUSTRIAL
SECTOR OVERVIEW
The commerciai/industrial sector consists of
approximately 62,000 customers, with
2,586 new customers added during 2007 for an
increase of about 4.4%. Energy usage of
customers within this sector varies from a few
kWh e()ch month to several hundred thousand
kWh per month. This sector represents
approximately 52% of IPC's total actual system
energy sales. The industrial customers in this
sector are IPC's largest individual energy
consumers. This group consists of
approximately 300 customers and accounts for
about 29% ofIPC's system energy sales.
Programs
Three programs targeting different energy
effciency activities are available to the
commerciai/industrial customers. The newest
program offered in this sector, Easy Upgrades,
was launched in Idaho in February 2007 and in
Oregon in May 2007. The program is designed
to deliver energy effciency and demand-side
savings to all existing commercial and industral
customers. Easy Upgrades offers a menu of
incentìves for lighting, HV AC, motors, building
shell, plug loads, and grocery refrgeration.
With the launch of this program, the former
Oregon School Effciency program was
discontinued since schools can now participate
in Easy Upgrades.
The Building Efficiency program for new
constrction projects achieves energy savings
that are cost-effective at the time of
construction. This program continues to offer
energy-saving improvements for lighting,
cooling, building shell, and energy control
effciency options.
Both Building Efficiency and Easy Upgrades
paricipants can receive incentives up to
$100,000 for any projects completed.
The Custom Efficiency program, formerly the
Industral Effciency program, was expanded to
include large commercial customers in 2007.
This program is intended for larger custom
projects.
IPC continues to offer its Oregon Commercial
Audits program to medium and small
commercial customers.
Commerciallindustral sector direct program
expenses are shown by program in Figure 5
below.
Figure 5. 2007 Commercial/Industrial Sector Direct Program Expense
0%
16%
Commercial/ndustrl ser Prorams
. Custom Effciency
. Easy Upgraes
. Building Effciency
. Oreon Commercial Audits
Total
2007
Expenses
$3.161,866
$711,494
$669.032
$1,981
$4,542,392
Pereentof
Expenses
69.6%
15.7%
14.7%
0.0%
100.0%
Page 26 Annual.Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Results
Total annual energy savings for the
commercial/industral programs increased by
about 88%, from 20,139,514 kWh in 2006 to
37,790,192 kWh in 2007. See Table 12. See
Table 13 regarding the demand reduction
attributable to 2007 commerciai/industral
program activity.
Table 12. Commercial/Industrial Sector Energy
Savings (kWh)
Building Effciency.................................
Easy Upgrades.................. ....................
Oregon Commercial Audits...................
Custom. Effciency..................................
Total
kWh
2,817,248
5,183,640
N/A
29,789,304
37,790,192
Table 13. Commercial/Industrial Sector Demand
Reduction (kW)
akW Summer
PeakkW
Building Efficiency.............................
Easy Upgrades..................................
Oregon Commercial Audits...............
Custom Effciency..............................
Total
322
592
N/A
3,401
4,314
454
780
N/A
3,622
4,856
Annual Report 2007 Page 27
Demand-Side Management
Commercial/Industrial Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Building Efficiency
Description
The Building Efficiency program is available to
commercial and industrial customers involved
in the constrction of new buildings or
constrctìon projects with significant additions,
remodels, or expansions. Under this program,
customers are able to apply energy effcient
design featues and technologies to their
projects that would otherwise be lost .
opportnities for energy savings. Launched in
Idaho in the spring of2005, the program
expanded to Oregon in January 2006.
Menu offerings within the Building Efficiency
program include measures and incentives for
lighting, cooling, building shell, and control
effciency options.
Program marketing enlists architects, engineer~,
and other local design professionals. Monthly
e-mail updates are sent to building developers,
design professionals, contractors, building
owners, IPC field personnel, and other
interested paries.
Idaho Power Company
Through this program, IPC is a primary sponsor
of the Boise Integrated Design Lab, which
provides technical assistance and training
seminars to local architects and designers. Much
of this activity is coordinated and supported
through NEEA's BetterBricksCI program.
Results
The success of the program in 2007 can partially
be attbuted to the addition of a group of three
control measures added to the menu of Building
Effciency incentive opportities.
Approximately 31 % of Building Efficiency
paricipants took advantage of the energy
management control system, the demand control
ventilation, and/or the variable speed drves.
These measures resulted in savings of over
1,500 MWh.
Partici pation
Durng 2007, a total of 81 applicants submitted
preliminary applications for projects to be
completed from 2007 to 2009. A total of
22 projects were completed and their incentives
awarded.
Energy Impact
The anual energy. savings increased by almost
300% over the prior year, from 704,541 kWh in
2006 to 2,817,248 kWh in 2007. The peak
demand reduction increased by 34%, from
338 kW in 2006 to 454 kW in 2007.
2008 Strategies
In 2008, IPC wil make minor modifications to
the program in order to accommodate Idaho's
recent adoption of the IECC, effective Januar
1, 2008. Eligibility requirements for three of the
14 measures changed for 2008.
Another change, effective February 1, 2008, is
that all final applications for incentive payments
must be submitted within 60 days of project
completion.
Page 28 Annual Hepor2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Commercial/Industrial Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Easy Upgrades
Description
In February 2007, Easy Upgrades was launched
in Idaho, followed by a May 2007 launch in
Oregon. The Easy Upgrades program was
designed to encourage commercial and
industral energy-saving retrofits. The program
has six menus of eligible, energy-saving
measures and incentives, covering various
commercial energy-saving opportnities in
lighting, HV AC, motors, building shell, plug
loads, and grocery refrigeration.
Program marketing included advertising in key
business publications and providing
10 workshops in February and September. The
workshops were designed to network with
contractors, vendors, and other trade alles,
inform them of the Easy Upgrades program, and
provide the tools to promote it. Additional
program-related communications went out to
trade allies, commercial customers, and IPC
field personneL.
As part of this new program, a special
promotion for directly installed
VendingMiser™ controls was started in
November, The energy-saving plug-in device
uses an occupancy-sensor based technology to
manage energy used by vending machines. By
the end of the year, over 1 ,000 controls were
installed.
IPC helps sponsor the Lighting Design Lab
(LDL) in Seattle through the Easy Upgrades
program. LDL provides technical assistance and
periodic local training seminars encouraging
energy-saving lighting. Additionally, IPC is a
sponsor ofNEEA's BetterBricksCI program,
disseminating general energy effciency
information to commercial customers.
IPC also offered a special promotion for LEDs.
This promotion focused on holiday lighting.
Through a' seasonal promotion, IPC provided a
per-bulb incentive to non-'residential customers
to replace incandescent holiday lights with more
effcient LED lights. Eight facilities parcipated
in this promotion, resulting in savings of
11,779 kWh. High-profie community displays
were targets for this promotion in order to
showcase the benefits of LEDs. The Winter
Garden Aglow display at the Idaho Botanical
Garden is a good example of that. They replaced
14,700 incandescent bulbs for an estimated
savings of7,996 kWh. Two local newspapers
covered this project. Signs posted near the
display educated over 26,500 attendees about
energy effcient LED lights.
Results
Participation
During the year, 219 pre-applications were
submitted and 104 projects were completed.
Those totals included eight pre-applications and
three completed projects in Oregon.
Energy Impact
The annual energy savings from the Easy
Upgrades program was 5,183,640 kWh, which
included the 1,116,288 kWh saved from
installng VendingMisers™. The peak demand
reduction impact fpr. the Easy Upgrades
program was 780 kW.
Annual Report 2007 Page 29
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Customer Satisfaction
Input is regularly solicited from program
participants to assess their satisfaction.
Approximately one month after they receive
their incentive payment, IPC provides each
participant with a customer survey Web link.
The surey asks a series of customer satisfaction
questions about their paricipation.
As of January 2008, responses indicate that 48%
of the respondents' first learned of the. Easy
Upgrades program from their contractor,
supplier, or vendor. The result supports IPC's
focus on marketing and communicating with
those same trade alles.
A key question asked on the surey was
"Overall, how much would you agree that you
received an excellent value from Idaho Power
through this program?" Nearly 73% ofthe
respondents replied "Strongly Agree," and
nearly 12% replied "Somewhat Agree."
2008 Strategies
IPC wil continue promoting the program to
business and professional associations, wil
coordinate with trade allies, and wil continue
the VendingMiser™ promotion until 2,500 units
are installed.
In 2008, several new featues wil be added. An
electronic lighting calculator for proposed
lighting retrofits will be offered to both
customers and lighting contractors. This tool
wil easily analyze a project's energy savings
potential, indicate incentives available, and
show the net retu on investment. The lighting
calculator wil be coupled with a Web-based
electronic application. This should make the
application process easier for customers and
reduce processing time for IPC staff. A series of
one-page testimonials from program participants
is being created to promote the program. These
success stories wil be available as printed
documents and displayed on theIPC Web site.
Page 30 Annual Rep 207
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Commercial/Industrial Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Oregon Commercial Audits
Description
Available to all Oregon commercial customers
since ì983, the Oregon Commercial Audits
program identifies opportnities. for commercial
building owners to achieve energy savings.
Evaluations, through energy audits, and
educational services are offered. Program
benefits and offerings are communicated to the
target market through an annual mailing to each
customer in the commercial sector.
As was done in 2005 and 2006, IPC offered the
Saving Energy Dollars publication to customers
who wanted more information on saving energy
and reducing expenses. New in 2007 was the
Building Energy Effciency Program (BEEP)
workshop, offered for free in lieu of an energy
audit, valued at $150 per participant. The
day-and-a-half workshop, held in Boise in
September, focused on proven, no-cost and low-
cost energy-saving techniques.
Results
In late August 2007, IPC mailed its annual letter
to all Oregon commercial customers. Customers
were notified of the availability of no-cost
energy audits and the IPC publication Saving
Energy Dollars. This mailing resulted in
16 customer responses for information or an
energy audit. Eight customers requested only
the Saving Energy Dollars publication. Eight
customers retued requests for energy audits.
IPC personnel conducted four of the. audits and
a third-part contractor conducted the other four
audits. One customer took advantage of the free
pass to the .BEEP workshop in September.
2008 Strategies
In 2008, the third-part energy auditing contract
is up for renewaL. IPC is planning to issue a new
Request for Proposal (RFP) from contractors for
futue energy audits. IPC is also evaluating the
potential for enhanced correlation between the
Oregon eommercial Auditprogram and the
EasyUpgrades incentive program by using the
energy audit as a tool to promote the Easy
Upgrades incentive program.
Annual Report 2007 Page 31
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Commercial/Industrial Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Custom Efficiency
Description
Initially implemented as a pilot program in
2003, the Industrial Effciency program was
selected for implementation as a result of the
2004 Energy Plan.. An expansion of this
program was identified in the 2006 Energy Plan
and, as a result, the program was expanded in
2007 and renamed the Custom Efficiency
program. It is offered to all large commercial
and industral customers in Idaho and Oregon.
The Custom Effciency program targets the
acquisition of peak demand reduction and
energy savings through the implementation of
customized energy effciency projects at
customer sites.
Operationally, the program provides training
and basic education on energy efficiency,
energy auditing services for project
identification and evaluation, and financial
incentìves for project implementation.
The key components in facilitating customer
implementation of energy efficiency projects are
energy auditing, customer training, and
education services.
Interested customers submit applications to IPC,
identifying potential projects applicable to their
facilities. The applications must provide
suffcient information to support the energy
savings calculations.
Project implementation begins after IPC's
review and approval of an application, followed
by the finalization of the terms and conditions of
the applicant's and IPC's obligations. When
possible, IPC conducts on-site power
monitoring and data collection, before and after
project implementation. The measurement and
verification process ensures that projected
energy savings are achieved. Verifying
applicants' information confirms that demand
reduction and energy savings are obtainable and
within program guidelines.
If changes in scope occur in a project, the
energy savings and incentive amounts are
recalculated based on the actual installed
equipment. Large, complex projects may take as
long as two years to complete.
In 2007, the Custom Effciency program
incorporated several changes. The program was
expanded to include all large commercial and
industrial customers. Previously, only customers
with a basic load capacity (BLC) of more than
500 kW were eligible to participate in the
program. Incentive levels were increased to
70% of the projectcost, or $0. 12/kWh,
whichever is less. The incentives previously
were capped at 50% of the project cost, or
$0. 12/kWh, whichever was less. In 2007, the
incentive cap was removed. Previously, the cap
was $100,000 per customer account.
The link between energy audits and completed
projects is historically strong; thus, IPC
expanded the number of contractors available to
do customer scoping audits from one company
in 2006 to four companies in.2007. Engineering
firms were chosen for their expertise in all
Page 32 Annual .Repor .2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
. major equipment areas and their ability to
. provide resources for customers throughout
IPC's service area.
Results
The Custom Efficiency program has achieved a
high penetration rate, approximately 25%, with
the large commercial and industrial customers.
Participation
IPC reviewed and approved 87 applications for
incentive projects in 2007. A total of 49 projects
were completed in 2007, consisting of
29 companies at 37 separate locations, and one
Oregon project. Three more Oregon project
applicants are scheduled for completion in early
2008.
increased by 45%. Figure 6 shows Custom
Effciency annual energy savings by measure.
2008 Strategies
In 2008, IPC plans to continue the expansion of
the Custom Effciency program through a
number of avenues. This wil include direct
marketing of the Custom Effciency program by
IPC field staff. IPC wil continue to provide site
visits and energy audits for project
identification, technical training for customers,
detailed energy audits for larger, complex
projects, and delivery of Industrial Effciency
Allance (lEA )-sponsored continuous energy
improvement practices to customers.
Energy Impact
The Custom Efficiency program increased
energy savings in 2007 by 55% over the prior
year, from 19,212 MWh to 29,789 MWh.
Additionally, completed projects increased by
23% and approved incentive applications
Figure 6. 2007 Custom Effciency Measures Annual Energy Savings (kWh)
Lighting
Refrgeration
Otr
Compressd Air
Pump
Fan
10,327,232
° 2,00,00 4,00,00 6,00,00 8,00,00 10,000,000 12,00,000
kWh
Annual Report 2007 Page 33
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
IRRIGATION SECTOR
OVERVIEW
The irrgation sector is comprised of agricultual
irrigation customers representing approximately
6,200 individuals with over 16,600 electrcal
service locations. Other irrgation users, such as
golf courses and parks, are assigned to other
sectors and are not eligible for DSM irrgation
programs.
In total, the irrgation sector represents
approximately 30% ofIPC' s summer peak load
and 12% of total system energy sales per year.
The load for this sector has not grown
significantly in many years; however, there is a
yearly variation in demand due primarily to the
impact of weather on irrgation needs.
Programs
IPC curently offers two programs to the
irrgation sector: Irigation Peak Rewards, a
demand response program designed to decrease
peak demand, and the Irrgation Effciency
Rewards, an energy effciency program
designed to encourage replacement or
improvement of ineffcient systems and
components.
Results
The Irrgation Peak Rewards program provided
significant peak reduction during the summer of
2007, with an average peak load reduction of
28.9 MW and a maximum summer peak
reduction of 37.4 MW. The maximum summer
peak reduction was approximately 18% higher
in 2007 than in 2006. This was due primarily to
changes in the program incentive structue,
which caused more two- and three-day-per-
week participants.
The Irrgation Effciency Rewards program had
strong participation in 2007. However, the
maturity of the program and the 'early adoption
of the menu options by irrgators have caused a
leveling off of projects in 2007. Program
redesign, implemented in 2006, offered
increased incentive levels and provided a menu
option program that is popular with irrgation
customers. The total energy savings for 2007
was 12,304 MWh on 819 projects across IPC's
service area. Table 14 shows the 2007 irrgation
sector's direct expenses, energy savings, and
summer peak demand reduction attributable to
Irrgation Peak Rewards and Irrgation
Effciency Rewards programs.
Table 14. 2007 Irrigation Program Summary, Energy Savings (kWh) and Demand Reduction (kW)
Direct
Expenses
kWh Energy kW Summer Peak
Savings Demand Reduction
Irrigation Effciency Rewards ................................
Irrigation Peak Rewards .. .....................................
Total
$2,001,961
$1,615,881
$3,617,843
3,407
37,441
40,848
12,304,073
N/A
12,304,073
Page 34 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Irrigation Sector
Demand Response Program
Irrigation Peak Rewards
Description
The Irrgation Peak Rewards program was
initially implemented as a pilot program in 2004
and fully implemented in 2005 as a result of the
2004 Energy Plan planning process. In 2006, the
program became available to IPC's Oregon
customers.
It is a voluntary program targeted toward
agricultual irrgation customers with pumps of
75 horsepower or greater. The program
objective is to reduce peak electrical load during
summer weekday afternoons. Preprogrammed
electronic time-activated switches tu off the
pumps of participating irrigation customers
durng intervals predetermined by IPC in
exchange for a financial incentive.
Participants select one of three different options
for the months of June, July, and August. A
monthly demand credit is associated with each
of the one-, two-, or three-day options and is
paid based on the participating customer's
monthly biling demand. Electric timers are
programmed to tu off irrgation pumps durng
preprogrammed time periods associated with the
selected option.
Durng 2007, the following options and
associated demand credit incentives were
available to customers from 4 to 8 p.m.
weekdays: a one-day-per-week, $2.01 per kW
demand; a two-days-per-week, $3.36 per kW
demand; or a three-days-per-week, $4.36 per
kW demand. Incentive. amounts credited to
customers' monthly bils are calculated
separately for each metered service point.
IPC made changes to the program in 2007, as
approved by the IPUC and OPUC.
Modifications increased the incentive amounts
for the two-days and three-days per week
options, and extended the program eligibility to
service locations with at least 75 horsepower, in
contrast to at least 100 horsepower required in
2006. A one-time $250 fee is required from
customers with pumps of75 to 99 horsepower
to help offset the cost of the switches and
maintain the program's cost effectiveness.
Results
Participation
Enlisted service points slightly increased during
2007, due to the lowered horsepower limit.
Participation rates show the program achieved
19.5% participation with 947 service points out
of4,852 eligible service points. In 2006, there
were 906 service points in Idaho and 13 service
points in Oregon. In 2007, there were
925 service points in Idaho and 22 service
points in Oregon.
Demand Impact
Each summer the program has produced
substantial and measurable impacts on peak
demand. During summer 2007, the program
produced an average load reduction across all
three months of 28.9 MW, with an average of
32.8 MW load reduction in the month of July.
Maximum load reduction occurred durng the
second half of June when an estimated
Annual Report 2007 Page 35
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
37.4 MW reduction was achieved. The
customers' peak reduction loads. are scheduled
evenly each day of the week by IPC, based on
historical information on system peaks.
2008 Strategies
IPC plans to operate the Irrigation Peak
Rewards program without any changes to its
structure for the 2008 irrgation season.
However, in cooperation with the Idaho
Irrgation Pumpers Association and IPUC staff,
IPC is putting together a working group in the
spring of 2008 to review the current program
and to investigate a dispatchable demand
response option for 2009.
Page 36 AnouaiRe 207
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Irrigation Sector
Energy Efficiency Program
Irrigation Efficiency Rewards
Description
Initially implemented as a pilot program in
2003, the Irrigation Effciency Rewards
program was fully developed following its
selection by the 2004 Energy Plan. Designed to
improve the energy effciency of irrgation
systems in IPC's service area, a wide range of
financial incentives and educational methods are
provided. The program has been offered in
Idaho since 2003 and in Oregon since 2006.
To meet the needs of various irrgation systems,
two separate options are available for major or
minor changes on new or existing systems.
The Custom Incentive Option provides
component upgrades and large-scale '
improvements. For new systems, the incentive is
$0.25 per kWh saved above standard installation
methods, not to exceed 10% of total project
cost. For existing system upgrades, the incentive
is $0.25 per kWh saved or $450 per kW,
whichever is greater, not to exceed 75% of total
project cost.
The Menu Incentive. Option is designed for
systems in which small maintenance upgrades
provide energy savings. Incentives vary based
on specific component replacement.
Payments are calculated on predetermined
average kWh savings per component. IPC
reviews and analyzes each proposal for a system
or component modification to determine and
verify the energy savings.
In addition to incentives, the program offers
customer education, training, and irrgation
system assessments. IPC agricultual
representatives sponsor, coordinate, conduct,
and present educational workshops for irrgation
customers, providing expert information and
training across IPC' s service area. Energy audits
are provided to prospective customers by IPC
agricultural representatives to evaluate potential
savings.
Agrcultual representatives from IPC also
engage agrcultual irrigation equipment dealers
in training sessions, increasing awareness of the
program and promoting it through the irrgation
equipment distribution channels.
Marketing efforts include direct mailings,
advertisements in agricultural publications, and
agricultual trade show participation.
Results
Participation
In 2007, a total of819 projects were completed
with irrgation customers, of which 120 were
under the Custom Incentive Option and
699 were under the Menu Incentive Option.
Incentive payments to customers in 2007 totaled
$1,744,260, down from $2,477,598 paid in
2006. The decrease was due to a decline in total
number of projects in 2007.
Energy Impact
The energy impact of the program was
12,304 MWh of energy savings and 3.4 MW of
peak load reduction in 2007. In 2006, the energy
Annual Report 2007 Page 37
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
savings was 16,986 MWh and 5.1 MW of peak
load reduction.
2008 Strategies
IPC plans to continue offering the program
without any changes in 2008. However, ongoing
IPC program reviews may result in adjustments
in the incentive levels, program strctue, and
marketing efforts. as operational experience
merits.
Page 38 Annual Rep 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
MARKET TRANSFORMATION
Northwest Energy Efficiency
Alliance (NEEA)
NEEA encourages and supports cost-effective
market transformation efforts in Idaho, Oregon,
Washington, and Montana. Through
partnerships with local utilities, NEEA
motivates marketplace adoption of energy
saving services and technologies, and
. encourages regional education and marketing
platforms. NEEA provides training and
marketing resources across residential,
commercial, and industral sectors.
IPC accomplishes market transformation in its
service area through membership and
coordinated activities with NEEA.
NEEA Activities
Industrial Efficiency Allance (lEA)
Activities in Idaho
The lEA is a multi-year strategic effort designed
to improve energy efficiency in two regional
industres considered heavy energy users: the
food processing and the pulp and paper
industres. The lEA also works with companies
that produce equipment and provide services for
these industres and with the utilities that serve
them.
Participants achieve cost savings through the
adoption of energy effcient business practices.
The lEA provides expert support, resources, and
services to give companies tools and training to
make energy effciency a core business value. In
exchange, participants are asked to commit to a
Continuous Energy Improvement Program,
which has the potential to increase production
capacity, improve equipment reliability, and
reduce operating costs and energy use by 5% to
20%. This effort is supported by providing
technical knowledge for individuals,
organizations, and manufacturing companies to
collaborate on energy efficiency
implementation. lEA members include the BP A,
regional utilities, the Energy Trust of Oregon
(ETO), the Oregon Departent of Energy
(ODOE), and the Idaho Offce of Energy
Resources (OER). Training activity in2007
included three industrial workshops
co-sponsored by the lEA, IPC, and others. This
training activity focused on pumps, motors, and
industrial refrigeration.
Commercial Allance Activities in Idaho
NEEA continued to provide support for
commercial energy efficient activities in Idaho
in 2007. NEEA continued fuding the Boise
Integrated Design Lab and local BetterBricksCI
trainings and workshops. NEEA sponsored
Idaho's Fourh Annual BetterBricksCI Awards,
issued in October in conjunction with the Idaho
Energy & Green Building Conference. IPC's
commercial programs, Building Efficiency and
Easy Upgrades, are designed to leverage NEEA,
BetterBricksCI, and Boise Integrated Design Lab
activities.
Distribution Efficiency Initiative
In 2007, IPC continued to participate with other
northwest utilities in NEEA' s Distrbution
Effciency Initiative project study.
Phase 1 Projects Completed
NEEA conducted a Distribution Effciency
Initiative Project study, which included a Load
Research project and Pilot Demonstration
projects. The Load Research project was
designed to establish the relationship between
applied voltage and energy, in addition to how
applied voltage affects demand for different
end-use load tyes such as electric heating,
electric water heating, and air conditioning. The
Pilot Demonstration projects controlled the
voltage at the substation in order to determine
the performance of different effciency methods.
Phase I was concluded in 2007.
The NEEA stuny's final report shows that
operating a utility distribution system in the
Annual Report 2007 Page 39
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
lower half of the acceptable voltage range of
120 through 114 volts saves energy (kWh),
reduces demand (kW), and reduces reactive
power (i.e., kilovolt ampere reactive (kvar))
requirements without negatively impacting the
customer. The energy savings results are within
the expected valuesofl % to 3% total energy
reduction, 2% to 4% reduction in kW demand,
and a 4% to 10% reduction inkvar demand.
As part of the completion of this project, the
66 Home Voltage Regulators (HVRs ) operating
in southern Idaho since March 2006 were
removed during the summer of 2007. The
purose of the HVR was to adjust service
entrance voltage at the residence.
Project for 2007
A new pilot wasimplemented durng the second
quarter of2007.to demonstrate remote
end-of-feeder control ofthe station transformer
load-tap changer. The project uses wireless
communication between the end-of-feeder and
the substation to adjust the substation voltage
based on the measured end-of- feeder voltage.
Application of technology allows better control
of theend-of- feeder voltage.
Residential NEEA Activities in Idaho
NEEA continues to provide support for two
programs offered by IPC: ENERGY STARCI
Homes Northwest and ENERGY STARCI
Lighting. In the ENERGY STARCI Homes
Northwest program, NEEA offers technical
assistance, · funding for certifications, and
builder and marketing support. In the Lighting
program, NEEA offers manufacturer and sales
coordination and marketing assistance through
its contractor, Fluid Market Strategies.
Other NEEA Activities in Idaho
In 2007, IPC participated with NEEA to develop
an RFP for the ENERGY STARCI Homes
Northwest impact evaluation. This study wil
provide estimates for whole-house energy
savings of ENERGY STARIS-certified homes in
the Northwest region. The evaluation approach
began development in November 2007.
Implementation of the analysis wil begin in
2008, and final results wil be provided in 2009.
Durng 2007, NEEA continued to support
building code improvements to jurisdictions in
Idaho in the form of funding for code training
and other activities. Funding supported the
efforts of the Idaho Building Code Coalition,
which was instrumental in moving the 2006
IECC through the Idaho legislative process. The
code was adopted durng the 2007.legislative
session and went into effect January 1, 2008. Its
purose is to increase energy effciency in new
constrction by requiring improved building
practices for the residential and commercial
sectors.
Each year, NEEA underwites the Idaho Energy
Conference through a contract with the
Association of Idaho Cities. NEEA continues to
provide general information support to the
region by funding the EnergyIdeas
ClearinghouseCI and ConWebCI.
NEEA also funded a variety of research projects
that were reported on in 2007. These reports are
valuable to IPC for providing information for
creating and evaluatingIPC's programs. These
research projects included the Existing
Multifamily Tenant Appliance Efficiency
Saturation Study; Single-Family Existing
Constrction Residential Stock Assessment;
Multifamily Residential New Constrction
Characteristics and Practices; and Residential
New Constrction Characteristics and Practices.
NEEA Funding
In 2005, IPC began the first year of the
2005-2009 contract and fuding agreement
with NEEA. Per this agreement, IPC committed
to fud $1,300,000 annually in support of
NEEA's implementation of market
transformation programs in IPC's service area.
Of this amount in 2007, 70% was funded
through the Idaho and Oregon Riders, and30%
Page 40 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
was fuded by a credit accumulated during the
previous contract period.
In 2007, IPC paid $891,472 to NEEA. The
Idaho jurisdictional share of the payments was
$846,898, while $44,574 was paid for the
Oregon jurisdiction. Other expeJ?ses associated
with NEEA activities, such as administration
and travel, are paid by IPC.
Preliminary estimates reported by NEEA
indicate that IPC' s share of regional market
transformation MWh. savings for 2007 is
28,601 MWh, or 3.3 aMW. IPC relies on NEEA
to report the energy savings and other benefits
ofNEEA's regional portfolio of initiatives.
For further information about NEEA, visit their
Web site at www.nwalliance.org.
Annual Report 2007 Page 41
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
ADVISORY GROUP (EEAG)
Formed in May 2002, the EEAG provides input
on formulating and implementing energy
efficiency and demand reduction programt;
funded by the Rider. Currently, the EEAG
consists of 12 members from across IPC's
service area and the Northwest. Members
represent a crosssection of customers, including
delegates from the residential, industral,
commercial, and irrgation sectors, as well as
representatives for the elderly, low income,
environmental organizations, state agencies,
public utility commissions, and IPC.
In 2007, the EEAG met three times: on
March 23, September 12, and November 14.
During the meetings, IPC requested
recommendations on neW program proposals,
provided a status of the Rider funding and
expenses, updated ongoing programs and
projects, and supplied information on
DSM issues.
EEAG Program
Recommendations
The following section provides a review of the
input provided to IPC by the EEAG regarding
major program implementation and operational
issues in 2007. Please note that all operational
DSM programs have been reviewed by EEAG;
however, only substantial changes or
modifications associated with EEAG input are
presented below.
Residential Programs
Residential programs reviewed in 2007 included
Heating and Cooling Effciency, ENERGY
STARCI Appliances, ENERGY STARCI Homes
Northwest, and AIC Cool eredit. In addition,
the group was provided updates for ENERGY
STARCI Lighting, Rebate Advantage, and
Energy House Calls.
Heating and Cooling Effciency
. Look to Delivery Service Representatives to
recommend program contractors in their
area. (Delivery Service Reps have been
assigned specifc DSM tasks and goals in
2007, which wil be tracked against actual
performance.)
. Contact outside sources for advice regarding
the design of the HV AC program.
(Contractors, other utilties, and regional
HVA C program experts were consulted
extensively for the design of the Heating and
Cooling Effciency program.)
. Implement quality assurance in the Heating
and Cooling program. (Quality assurance by
a third party wil occur in approximately 7%
of all installs for this program.)
. To accurately measure NC savings, strictly
measure using a Seasonal Energy Efficiency
Ratio (SEER) 13 baseline. (Cost
effectiveness for the Heating and Cooling
program used SEER 13 as the savings
baseline.)
. Implement a sales incentive for contractors
in the Heating and Cooling program.
(Contractors receive $50for services
related to this program.)
. Offer a design workshop and training to
HV AC contractors. (Training workshops for
each region in ¡PC were held in 2007, and
additional workshops are planned in 2008.)
ENERGY STARCI Appliances
. Take old refrgerators out of service.
(Currently exploring options to offer a
refrigerator recycling program.)
. Join with water utility to market clothes
washers. (No local water utilites in ¡PC
Page 42 Annual Repor 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
service area offer energy effciency
incentives at this time, but wil explore
avenues for joint marketing efforts.)
. Do not provide incentives for plasma
television sets. (It's unlikely that plasma TVs
would prove cost effective because of their
high energy use.)
. Collaborate with local appliance retailers.
(Developing relationships and materials for
appliance retailers to use as part of the
ENERGY STARCI appliance program.)
. An automated process would ensure that
applications and incentives are processed
effciently. (Incentive processing was
automated in 2007 to increase accuracy and
improve customer response time.)
ENERGY STARCI Homes Northwest
. Educate mortgage lenders about ENERGY
STARCI Homes Nortwest. (Lenders wil be
invited to realtor training sessions.)
· Several members suggested that the A1C
Cool Credit program be mandatory for
ENERGY STARCI Homes. It was also
suggested that customers who do not
participate in A1C Cool Credit have a higher
connection fee for their new homes. (IPC
has no plans to require customers to
participate in programs, the preference
being to pursue voluntary participation
which leads to better customer satisfaction.)
General Suggestions
· When a bil stuffer is sent out, follow up
with a co-marketing piece, like a radio or
newspaper ad. (Marketing plans wil include
opportunities for cross-marketing programs
through various media channels.)
. Perhaps limit the amount of information
included in the bils so that people are more
likely to read the bil stuffer. (Because of the
number of programs and the demandfor bil
stuffer area availabilty, most slots wil be
filled throughout the calendar year on the
bil stuffer calendar.)
. Target those markets where customers may
not be expecting energy efficiency
messages. (Currently exploring ways to
co-market a bil stuffer with other utilties in
Boise.)
Commercial and
Industrial Programs
At the September EEAG meeting,IPC
presented an Easy Upgrades program report,
and offered proposals for a single-measure
promotion for the VendingMiser™ program and
a Holiday Lighting program for commercial
customers. Members provided the following
suggestions:
. Encourage short-term promotions to take
advantage of the market environment, such
as the Christmas tree lights.
(VendingMiser™ program began in
December 2007 and wil go through
April 2008.)
. Large numbers of vending machines that
came out in the 1990s are about to be
refubished, and the region is looking at
partering with vending machine
manufacturers to improve energy effciency
in older models. (IPC wil investigate these
opportunites in the future.)
. The consensus of the group was to move
forward with the VendingMiser™
promotion, pending full, cost-effective
analysis. (The promotion launched in
December 2007.)
Annual Report 2007 Page 43
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Irrigation Programs
The Irgation Peak Rewards program is a
successful program, with visible megawatt
reductions in load observable at the system load
data level at 4 p.m. on scheduled summer
weekdays. A program update was provided at
the November EEAG meeting. Questions and
COllllents included:
. A question was posed regarding the
necessity of requiring customers to sign up
each year to participate in the Peak Rewards
program. (There are several reasons that
make it more effective to do it this way: crop
rotation, lease agreements that are not
finalized until the middle of the next year,
equipment issues, and quality assurance
issues.)
· Offer an increased incentive to customers to
entice them to sign up sooner. (An "early
install incentive" might get customers in the
program sooner, but not necessarily more of
them, because there are other constraints on
irrigators that prevent them from signing up.
One member stated that he has some
irrigation systems that wil never be put on
the program due to their complexity.)
Local Energy Efficiency Funds
(LEEF)
The EEAG was consulted regarding the purose
and project cap limit of the Small
Project/Education Funds, which are now called
the Local Energy Effciency Funds (LEEF).
When the Small ProjectlEducation Fund was
authorized in 2003, individual projects were
limited to $5,000. Aproposal was made to
increase individual expenditues through this
fud, as the number of requests greater than
$5,000 has increased over the years.
Discussion focused on the relative merits of the
fund, and its flexìbility in responding to
unsolicited proposals from customers.
The suggestion was made that if it looks like the
project could be turned into a program and made
available to others, that potential should be
pursued.
It was the general consensus of the group that
this fund should have the flexibility to fud
projects above $5,000 but, in most cases, not
exceed $10,000. It was also suggested that the
pool of fund dollars should be allowed to grow
as well so that funds are available for beneficial
projects.
fPC wil fund projects larger in scope in the
future, and solicit feedback from EEA G for
specifc proposals that exceed $10,000.
Page 44 Annual Repor 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
OTHER PROGRAMS AND
ACTIVITIES
Residential Energy Efficiency
Ed ucationl n itiative
IPC recognizes the value of general energy
effciency awareness and education in creating
customer demand for, and satisfaction with, its
programs. Increased awareness of energy
effciency and IPC's residential programs are
being achieved through the Residential Energy
Effciency Education Initiative.
Activities
Program activities durng 2007 included the
design and implementation of a five-class series
promoting energy effciency to an adult
audience, titled Fall Energy Effciency and
Sustainability Series. Topics covered included
simple no- and low-cost ways to save energy,
weatherization, insulation, ventilation, green
building, sustainable building with Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED),
easy ideas of ways to re-think, reduce, reuse,
recycle, net metering, and renewable energy
sources. The classes were well attended all five
nights, with 50 to 100 attendees per night.
Another outcome of this program was to
produce printed materials to improve customer
awareness of energy saving ideas, including the
Summer and Winter Energy Savings Tip cards
and the Home Energy Efficiency Audit
brochures.
Through use of the Internet, the Residential
Energy Efficiency Education Initiative program
reached out to IPC' s customers and others
offering energy effciency ideas and solutions.
The IPC Web site pages related to energy
efficiency information were evaluated and
updated.
In addition to conducting workshops and
seminars for local groups to promote IPC's
residential programs and energy savings ideas,
IPC conducted open houses and outreach
programs to build and foster employee
awareness for energy effciency. The primary
goal was to focus on general effciency and
increased participation in existing program
offerings.
Commercial Education
Initiative
IPC has long recognized the value and
importance of providing energy effciency
information to commercial customers. Efforts to
develop a commercial customer energy
education initiative began in the fall of2007.
The focus was on the development of a short-
term pilot program targeting small commercial
customers and the development of an energy
effciency education strategy for all commercial
customers.
Durng the fall of 2007, goals were established
and a marketing plan was developed to reach all
commercial customers with energy efficiency
education. Field research was conducted with
IPC personnel assisting in gauging the energy
education needs of the customers. Additional
research was conducted assessing the industr's
best practices for small business energy
effciency education. An implementation plan
was developed and is due to launch in 2008. The
main objectives are to increase participation in
existing commercial DSM programs, enhance
customer satisfaction, and reduce energy use for
this customer segment. The Commercial
Education Initiative wil compliment and
support existing DSM program activities.
Local Energy Efficiency
Funds (LEEF)
Formerly called the Small Projects and
Education Fund, the purose of LEEF is to
provide modest fuding for short-term projects
Annual Report 2007 Page 45
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
and activities that do not fit within other
categories of energy effciency programs but
stil provide a defined benefit to fuhering DSM
targets.
In 2007, one project met these criteria. The OER
arranged for the installation and long-term
monitoring of a Hallowell International cold
climate heat pump durng the 2007-2008
heating season in McCall, Idaho. The home was
previously heated with an electrc forced-air
fuace and was certified in 2006 as an
ENERGY STARCI home. In 2007, LEEF
awarded $7,500 to support the research project
and to test the new heat pump's effectiveness in
a cold climate. In retu, OER wil provide all
data, data analyses, and reports that result from
this study.
Page 46 Annual Re 2007
Idaho Power Company
REGULATORY INITIATIVES
This past year was the first of athree-year pilot
period during which IPC is testing the effects of
a Fixed-Cost Adjustment (FCA) and a
Performance- Based DSM Incentive. The two
pilots are being operated on a limited basis to
allow for a thorough evaluation to be conducted
prior to a broader application of the financial
mechanisms.
Fixed-CostAdjustment Pilot
The FCA is a tre-up mechanism that"d i" iecoup es, or separates, energy sa es from
revenue in order to remove the financial
disincentive that exists when IPC invests in
DSM resources. On March 12,2007, the IPUC
issued Order No. 30267 authorizing a three-year
pilot of theFCA within the residential and small
commercial customer classes. Under the FCA,
rates are adjusted annually up or down to
recover or refud the difference between the
fixed-costs authorized by the IPUC in the most
recent rate case and the fixed-costs that IPC
actually received through energy sales during
the previous year. Through the application of
this tre-up mechanism, IPC is not financially
harmed by decreases in energy sales within the
residential and small commercial customer
classes, thus removing any disincentives for IPC
to pursue DSM opportnities with those
customers.
TheFCA pilot is limited to the residential and
small commercial classes in recognition of the
fact that, for these customers, a high percentage
of fixed costs are recovered through energy
charges. Confining the pilot to the residential
and small commercial classes also allows the
tre-up mechanism to be tested on a limited
basis to minimize any unintended consequences.
Demand-Side Management
Penormance-Based DSM
Incentive Pilot
To compliment the FCA pilot, IPC is testing the
effects of a Performance-Based DSM Incentive
mechanism over thè same three-year period. On
March 12,2007, the IPUC issued Order
No. 30268 authorizing the implementation of a
Pedormance-Based DSM Incentive pilot that
allows IPC to retain a portion of the financial
benefits resulting from DSM activities when
energy savings targets are exceeded. IPC is also
subject to a penalty under the incentive pilot
should it fail to meet energy savings levels
previously achieved. During the pilot period, the
incentive mechanism is being applied only to
the ENERGY STARCI Homes Northwest
Program. By applying this mechanism on a
limited basis, IPC is able to gain a better
understanding of the effects of a performance
incentive while minimizing the potential impact
to customers. IPC ultimately intends to use the
information gained durng the pilot period to
develop a performance-based incentive
mechanism that can be applied to the entire
portfolio of DSM programs.
Enhanced Commitment to
Energy Efficiency and DSM
As part of the FCA implementation process, IPC
is committed to enhancing its efforts towards
promoting energy effciency in several key areas
including, but not limited to:
. A broad availability. of effciency and load
management programs.
. Building code improvement activity.
. Pursuit of appliance code standards.
. Expansion of DSM programs beyond peak
shaving/load shifting programs.
. Third-part verification.
Annual Report 2007 Page 47
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Throughout 2007, and increasingly during the
last three quarters of the year after issuance of
IPCU Order No. 30267, IPC actively pursued
numerous, additional opportities to promote
energy effciency.
Availability of Efficiency and Load
Management Programs
IPC offers an array of energy efficiency and
demand response programs spaning all of the
major customer segments. The majority of
IPC's DSM programs were available prior to
implementation of the FCA. However, since
implementation of the FCA, IPC has focused
additional resources toward energy effciency
education and program marketing.
IPC continued to increase energy effciency
awareness among its customers through a
variety of media outlets. Incremental education
and outreach activities in 2007 included
participation in Earth Day events, publication of
a Summer Tips card on energy effciency,
conducting a Fall Energy Efficiency and
Sustainability Series at the Boise Public Library,
and a publication of a Holiday Purchases
Energy Effciency Tips flyer. Additionally, the
publication of the Parers in Conservation
Calendar provided energy effciency
information to program participants, trade alles,
and IPC employees. IPC also distrbuted energy
effciency information via 22 media updates,
12 Customer Connection newsletters included in
monthly bils, six radio interviews, five bil
inserts, and one press release.
The promotion of energy efficient lighting
received additional focus in 2007. In the fall,
IPC sponsored a lighting workshop conducted
by the staff of the Seattle-based Lighting Design
Lab. IPC staff also conducted 17 in-store
customer education outreach events to inform
customers about the benefits of energy effcient
lighting. Furhermore, IPC developed and
implemented a communication strategy to
address customer concerns about the mercury
content of CFL bulbs and to educate customers
on the proper disposal of CFLs.
DSM staff provided program and general energy
effciency information to five engineering firms
and two state agencies. These direct marketing
efforts in 2007 within the commercial and
industrial customer segments were aimed at
architects and engineers to enhance their
awareness of IPC' s DSM programs and how
energy effciency can be incorporated into new
projects.
IPG also incorporated the offerings of the lEA
through NEEA to IPC food processing
customers. In 2007, there were 19 facilities in
the.IPC service area engaged in various degrees
with the lEA and the implementation of
Continuous Energy Improvement practices at
their facilities.
Other actions in 2007 included IPC joining the
BPA-sponsored Utility Sounding Board (USB).
Networking and regional coordination are
benefits of participation in this group.
IPC also brought grocery refrgeration experts to
Boise and put on grocery effciency trainings
and co-sponsored a BEEP workshop in
September.
Building Code Improvement
Activity
In 2007, the Idaho legislatue adopted the IECC
2006 Energy Code, which IPC staff supported
through the Idaho Building Code Coalition. The
new code went into effect in January 2008.
In 2007, IPC staff met with the Boise Climate
Protection Program Advisory Committee and
the Caldwell Planning Department to support
efforts by these groups to improve residential
and commercial building codes. Both of these
meetings were an opportity to educate staff
about the ENERGY STARCI Homes Northwest
program and discuss requiring all residential
Page 48 Annual Repor 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
new construction in their respective jurisdictions
to conform to the ENERGY STARCI Homes
Northwest standard.
Pursuit of Appliance Code
Standards
IPC contracted with Quantec, LLC, to conduct a
study of potential savings and costs associated
with enacting appliance efficiency standards in
Idaho similar to those recently enacted in
Oregon. The results of Quantec' s assessment
and recommendations wil be incorporated into
the 2009 Energy Plan to determine the
economic viability of adopting such standards in
Idaho.
~xpansion of DSM Programs
Beyond Peak-Shaving/
Load-Shifting Programs
IPC looks for opportnities to enhance or
expand its DSM program offering. For example,
in 2007 a new incentive-based holiday lighting
program was offered to commercial customers.
This program was implemented on an
accelerated schedule to provide additional
energy savings within the commercial customer
segment in 2007 and to raise awareness of LED
lighting among all customer classes.
Additionally, a direct-install VendingMiser™
promotion began in 2007 and wil continue in
2008. This promotion wil provide small and
large commercial customers with free controls
to cut energy use on their refrigerated beverage
vending machines. This promotion greatly
increased participation and energy savings. In
the firstseven months of this program, IPC
received 136 applications for VendingMiser™
installation, and in the last two months IPC,
through its vendor, installed
83 VendingMisers™.
Late in 2007, IPC issued an RFP seeking
professional services to determine potential
DSM energy savings and peak load reduction
within IPC's service area. Nexant, a San
Francisco-based consulting firm, was selected to
conduct the DSM potential study and provide a
DSM simulation model, along with DSM
program recommendations that can be
implemented to achieve the identified potèntiaL.
This project is expected to be completed by July
3 I, 2008. The information provided by the
potential study wil serve asthe basis for DSM
resource options analyzed in the 2009 Energy
Plan.
Third-Party Verification
IPC utilizes third-part consultants and agents
whenever possible, practical, and affordable.
Consultants verify the quality of work
conducted, the amount of energy savings
achieved, and also obtain data on energy
efficiency and demand response measures and
programs. The following are examples ofIPC's
ongoing utilization of third parties to monitor
and verify its DSM program pedormance:
. IPC is a fuder of, and paricipant in, the
Regional Technical Forum (RTF). The RTF
is an advisory committee established in 1999
to develop standards to verify and evaluate
savings of energy efficiency programs and
measures. IPC views the RTF as a reliable
third-part source for information on
programs and measures and used the RTF
databases to provide deemed savings for
some energy efficiency measures.
. In 2007, IPC contracted with a third-part
consulting firm, Ecotope Consulting, to
reevaluate the ENERGY STARCI Homes
Northwest measures and savings after the
new IECC 2006 building codes were
implemented in Idaho. This analysis resulted
in several program changes, including a
revised incentive and revised assumed
energy savings per home for 2008.
. The ENERGY STARCI Homes Northwest
program regularly utilizes certified Home
Pedormance Specialists for independent
Annual Report 2007 Page 49
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
third-part verification, ensurng that each
ENERGY STARCI home is being built to
ENERGY STARCI standards. The Idaho
OER then certifies each of these homes as
an ENERGY STARCI home.
· The Energy House Calls program contracts
with a third part consultant to do quality
assurance on 5% of homes serviced by the
program. This consultant visits the selected
sites within approximately one month of the
energy house call and verifies that the
energy effciency measures provided by
IPC's third-part installation contractor were
pedormed to program specifications.
· The Heating and Cooling Efficiency
program, new in 2007, has begu training a
third-part consultant to verify savings on
5-10% of all projects and plans on
implementing this process in 2008.
IPC's Internal Energy Efficiency
Commitment
IPC's commitment towards promoting energy
. effciency extends beyond encouraging,
incenting, and educating its customers. In 2007,
IPCcommitted to pilot an integrated design
approach for a new operations facility to be
constrcted in Lake Fork, Idaho. TheLong
Valley Operations Center wil be the first new
facility built by IPC to use this process. This
method of project development brings the
owner, design team, contractors, and
commissioning agent together at the inception
of the project to take advantage of their
combined expertise and maximize coordination
throughout the process. Initial meetings defined
IPC's goals for the project, and the goals were
linked to potential LEED credits. Results
support a strong case for LEED Silver
certification and the potential exists for LEED
Gold certification on the project.
The design team's goal is to pursue all
10 energy efficiency credits, which would make
the facility at least 42% more efficient than the
American Society of Heating, Refrgerating, and
Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 2003
standards. Opportnities for renewable
generation and other innovative design solutions
wil be investigated throughout the design
phase. In addition to energy effciency,' other
important IPC goals are to ensure the facility fits
well into the surrounding community while
providing local IPC employees with a fuctional
operations center. IPC's decision to take a
leadership position in high-performance
buildings and sustainable design for their own
facilities demonstrates not only enhanced
commitment to energy effciency but can serve
as a model for other companies.
In 2007, IPC began retrofitting its Corporate
Headquarters (CHQ) with energy effciency
projects. In 2007, IPC increased the energy
efficiency of the HV AC system at the CHQ by
installng a new system to centrally control and
better manage the system from an energy
perspective. IPC also implemented nighttime
lighting controls at the CHQ in order to gain
effcient use oflighting electrcity. IPC is
systematically replacing older, ineffcient
lighting in its facilities with more effcient
lights.
Table 15 shows IPC energy savings in 2007 as
compared to both IPC operational targets as
well as IRP targeted savings. The operational
targets for the commerciai/industral programs
were reduced from the original energy plan
targets to account for the timing of new program
development within the commercial sector.
Page 50 Annual Report 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Table 15. 2007 IPC DSM Program Targets and Results
Demand Response Programs
Residential and Irrigation ............................. ........ .........
Energy Effciency Programs
Residential................................................................... .
Commercial/Industrial.................................................. .
Irrigation ..............................................................;.........
Total
20071PC
Operational Targets
MW
47.8
MWh
11,231
21,447
11,940
44,618
2007 Energy
Plan Targets
MW
39.4
MWh
11,230
24,397
5,200
40,827
2007 Savings
MW
48.2
MWh
12,441
37,790
12,304
62,535
Annual Report 2007 Page 51
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
ApPENDICES
The following financial and performance tables
provide a summary of program activity,
including program expenses, fuding sources,
energy savings, and levelized costs for savings.
Page 52 Annual Repor 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
Appendix 1. Idaho Rider, Oregon Rider, BPA, and NEEA Funding Balances
2007 Beginning Balance........................................................................................................................ ....
2007 Funding plus Accrued Interest........... ........................... ......................................................... ............
Total 2007 Funds
2007 Expense............................................................................................. ...............................................
2007 Year.End Balance
$5,934,463.21
9,036,071.75
14,970,534.96
(13,487,460.38)
$1,483,074.58
2007 Beginning Balance....................................................................................................................... .....
2007 Funding plus Accrued Interest........ ..................... .... .... ....... ......................... ................. ...................
Total 2007 Funds
2007 Expense....,.................................................................................................................. .....................
2007 Year.End Balance
$393,731.19
425,682.64
819,413.83
(409,188.37)
$410,225.46
Total Funding and Accrued Interest October 2001-December 2006 .........................................................
2007 Funding plus Accrued Interest.... ............. ................................. .........................................................
Total Funds May2002-December 2007
Total Expense-Inception through December 2006...................................................................................
2007 Expense....................................................................................................................... .....................
Total BPA Fundéd Expenses ...........................................................................................................
2007 Year.End Balance(a)
$2,909,157.08
247,732.51
3,156,889.59
(2,909,157.08)
(200,685.96)
(3,109,843.04)
$47,046.55
2007 IPC Contractual Obligation................................................................................................................$1,300,000.00
Credit Applied tp 2007 Contractual Obligation....................................................................................
Interest Credit Applied to 2007 Contract Obligation ............................................................................
Interest Credit Applied to 2008 Contract Obligation(b).........................................................................
Total 2007 Cash Payments by IPC ..............................................................................................................
Credit Balance
Beginning Balance Funds Held by NEEA ...................................................................... ..'...................
2007 Credit Applied to Contract Obligation.........................................................................................
(325,588.00)
(68,159.00)
(14,781.00)
891,472.00
(976,771.00)
325,588.00
2007 Year.End Credit Balance ($651,183.00)
(a) The 2007 balance of SPA funds was committed to two Solar 4 R Schools projects prior to the suspension of SPA funding in 2007. These
projects are scheduled for completion in 2008.
(b) The fir~t quarter invoice for the IPC 2008 contractual obligation to NEEA was processed in December 2007 with the amount scheduled
to be amortized over the first quarter. Interest credit was immediately recognized in 2007.
Annual Report 2007 Page 53
Demand-Side Management Idaho Power Company
Appendix 2.2007 DSM Expenses by Funding Source (Dollars)
Idaho Oregon
Sector/Program Rider Rider BPA IPC Total Program
Energy Effciency/Demand Response
Residential
AlC Cool Credit..........................................2,421,461 0 0 4,692 $2,426,154
Appliance Program......................................8,746 460 0 69 $9,275
Energy House Calls..................... ................251,743 3,349 80,830 450 $336,372
ENERGY STAR~ Homes Northwest..........451,775 12,249 0 11,020 $475,044'
Heating and Cooling Efficiency.... ................482,051 3,289 0 2,871 $488,211
Oregon Residential Weatherization.............0 0 0 3,781 $3,781
Rebate Advantage.......................................58,854 4,609 25,073 733 $89,269
ENERGY STAR~ Lighting............................519,818 11,787 15,595 10,445 $557,646
WAQC..........................................................0 0 28,035 1,295,588 $1,323,624
Commercial/Industrial
Commercial Building Effciency....... .............661,485 5,766 0 1,781 $669,032
Easy Upgrades............................................680,376 28,014 0 3,105 $711,494
Oregon Commercial Audit................. .........0 1,800 0 181 $1,981
Custom Effciency........................................3,032,047 110,634 0 19,185 $3,161,866
Irrigation
Irrigation Efficiency Rewards.......................1,881,116 93,924 0 26,922 $ 2,001,961
Irrigation Peak Rewards......................... ......1,520,106 54,747 0 41,028 $1,615,881
Energy Effciency/Demand Response Total 11,969,578 330,627 149,534 1,421,852 $13,871,592
Market Transformation
NEEA...........................................................846,898 44,574 0 1,868 $893,340
Market Transformation Total 846,898 44,574 °1,868 $893,340
Other Programs and Activities
Commercial
Commercial Education Initiative...................25,427 1,314 0 82 $26,823
Other
BPA CRC Renewables .... ............................0 0 31,645 0 $31,645
Distribution Efficiency Initiative(a) .................6,514 343 0 2,130 $8,987
DSM Direct Program Overhead...................54,339 2,465 0 105 $56,909
LEEF(b) ..........,.............................................7,571 (50)0 0 $7,520
Other Programs and Activities Total 93,851 4,072 31,645 2,317 $131,885
Indirect Program Expense
DSM Accounting and Analysis.....................564,129 29,367 0 139,006 $732,503
Energy Effciency Advisory Group...............2,488 109 0 0 $2,597
Special Accounting Entries..........................10,516 439 19,507 $30,462
Indirect Program Expense Total 577,133 29,915 19,507 139,006 $765,561
Totals $13,487,460 $409,188 $200,686 $1,565,043 $15,662,378
(a)IPC portion of Distribution Effciency Initiative expenses wil be reversed in 2008.
(b)Oregon corrrection for 2006 entry for bulbs purchased and used in Idaho.
Page 54 AnnualReport 2007
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
II ~8 II ~N ..
~
(l s ~~co ('
- ~..~N I:S 0íi00z0z..;;l::c:fi ô fi fi fi fi fi fi ô fi
.. J
M '"M0uiJ:(l ~N ~co 0 (l (l co II ~N ~'i ~('..s ..N i.S ....
~0 0 0 z 0 0 a 0 z 0 0iiôôôôôôgfiôôfi;:M M M M M M M M
e;i l 0 II ~co II i.i.II N N ~N coNN..N ..N N ......
i .J
Z
-.. :!8 ;1 ß N ~II .i "~~E", C co ..,.
E II '"ri ('
lI åJ Do lOJC
!!~~~r:co (l ~co ~0 ~S0....- :0 ""ia (l 0 ..N! fl g oi I:oi ~i ~..g m ~C II N ..
.i if
co co N II N co ..~..ri Ñ i6 oi ÑN..
~~~(l (l ~..('0 i...i8 ~~co co (l ..~('s.\('~(l II ....co 0 ea ,.
~m (Ó e i6 Ñ ii i oi Ñ ..N tæ(l M co N co M ..~(':g Z4 ..~co ia 0 co::M M M ..M ..ti =0 M M
II Jiiul II N ~I ....(l co ,.N
~
..
~
..,.t;..Ie.co ..fa ~~~N C'C'0..:ã oi ~i6 ,.co ~(l ó ('I ........
l'M ,.II co co (l ~..M co 8('Z4 II Z4 M C't:..M M ..g &!5 M
II l ~I/.l l ~C ;;;;~;li .l
I/I Gl :=j 5 ..E E 5 'ë''ë'-0 ë'IL 0 0 0 ;;~~.c 0 .c .c .c .c Q.Q.Q.II Q.Q.
:~'"~g (l ..(',...N ~co ~(l
Do ('N ~..N ..ts ('~....co(lc:..N
E
~C)2 iñ la.i~1:g ~0 i IIenz.91 i ~"EC;Dl U
!c:IEi!;;,.5 w 3:0:Dl Dl ;:l0E.I J:::!:~/I -~g0t!¡¡\:\:8
Dl
LN0~i I/.91e3:~~/I
-8 Ei.ü ~ew Q.;;ø ø -0 !!0 ix IE I!E ~~c:/I ~J ¡¡8 wiif.~~II ix J w R~e c:E ~c ,.~~Cl c l Cl ::l ¡¡l C .2.-C .5"!.!l:c:0 /I l 0 iilã.w w i Dl ~~E J2 ,.icr/I l!.0 I/Dl~c:Z z !E .5 II 8 :§CD i w w W J:0 3:3:0 ai w 0 ":sa.Do u .5
et
Annual Report 2007 Page 55
"Uii10 CD oi0);i::Eat;;~g.I\~
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

3
.

2
0
0
7

D
S
M

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
To
t
a
l

Co
s
t
s
Le
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

C
o
s
i
(
a
)
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Su
m
m
e
r
Pe
a
k
De
m
a
n
d
(
d
)
Pr
o
g
r
a
.
U
t
i
l
t
y
b
)

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
c
)
(d
o
l
a
r
s
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
To
t
a
l
Ut
i
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
Pa
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
NE
E
A
(
3
)
$8
9
3
,
3
4
0

$
8
9
3
,
3
4
0
28
,
6
0
1
,
4
1
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
(
4
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i

I
n
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
Ot
h
e
r
SP
A

O
t
h
e
r

C
&
R
D

a
n
d

C
R
C
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
o
n

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
DS
M

D
i
r
e

P
r
o
r
a
m

O
v
e
r
h
a
d
Lo
c
a
l

E
n
e
r
g

E
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

F
u
n
d
s
To
t
a
l

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

D
i
r
e
c
t

E
x
p
e
s
e
In
d
i
r
e

P
r
o
r
a
m

E
x
p
e
n
s
e
To
t
l

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e
(a
)

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

C
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

I
n
t
e
g
r
a
e
d

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

P
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

I
n
c
l
u
d
e

U
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
.
(b
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

u
t
i
l
i
t
y

C
o
s
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

I
n
c
u
r
r
d

by

I
P
C

t
o

I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
u
r
c

C
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
l

e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C
a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(d
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

I
s

r
e
p
o
r
t

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.
(1
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

c
o
t
s

u
s
e
d

t
o

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
r
c

c
o
t

I
s

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d

a
t

2
4
%

o
f

U
t
i
l
i
t

c
o
t
.
(2
)

M
e
a
s
u
r
e

L
i
f
e

i
s

w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

e
n
e
r
g

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

o
f

c
u
s
t
o
m

o
p
t
i
o
n

(
1
5

y
e
a
r
s
)

a
n
d

m
e
n
u

o
p
t
i
o
n
s

(5

y
e
a
r
s
)
,
(3
)

T
h
e

k
W
h

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

a
r
e

p
r
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s

f
r
m

N
E
E
A
.

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
u
r
c

co
s
t
s

I
n
c
l
u
d
e

o
n
l
y

U
t
i
l
t
y

c
o
s
t
,

w
h
i
c
h

u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
s

t
h
e

a
c
t
u
a
l

t
o
t
l
.
(4
)

Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e

e
x
p
n
s
e
s

i
n

2
0
0
7

w
e
r
e

a
l
l
o
c
t
e
d

a
m
o
n
g

al
l

r
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

g
r
o
p
s
.
$2
6
,
8
2
3
$2
6
,
8
2
3
$3
1
,
6
4
5
$3
1
,
6
4
5
$8
,
9
8
7
$8
,
9
8
7
$5
,
9
0
9
$5
,
9
0
9
1
p
r
o
j
e
c
$7
,
5
2
0
.
0
0
$7
,
5
2
0
.
0
0
9,
0
0
0
7
$0
.
1
3
5
$0
.
1
3
5
$1
4
.
8
9
.
8
1
7
$2
5
.
9
3
8
.
5
5
0
91
,
1
4
5
,
3
5
6
57
.
0
7
2
$7
6
5
,
5
6
1
$1
5
,
6
6
2
,
3
7
8
o CD3ii::a.We:
CD s:ii::ii10 CD3 CD::-ã:
ii::o "U ~..C)o3"0ii::-.
;i::::c:~æ"0o::I\oo-."'Dl
CO CDoi-.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7
a.Dl::o "'o ~..
NQ
r
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
To
t
a
l

Co
s
t
s

sa
i
n
g
s
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
An
n
u
a
l
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Pe
a
k
Me
a
s
u
r
e
To
t
a
l
Pa
r
t
l
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
ut
i
i
i
t
e
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
En
e
r
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
Li
f
e
To
t
a
l

U
t
l
i
t
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(d
o
i
a
r
s
)
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
W
)
(k
W
)
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
($
/
W
h
)
($
/
W
h
)
Al
C

C
O
L

C
r
e
i
t
20
0
3
20
4
$2
7
5
,
6
4
5
$2
6
9
,
6
8
0
15
9
10
20
0
4
42
0
$2
8
7
,
2
5
3
$2
7
4
,
6
8
6
40
2
10
20
0
5
2,
3
6
9
$7
5
4
,
0
6
2
$7
1
7
,
9
0
2
2,
7
4
8
10
20
0
5,
3
6
9
$1
,
2
3
5
,
4
7
6
$1
,
1
3
1
,
4
3
9
5,
6
3
7
10
20
0
7
13
,
6
9
2
$2
,
4
2
6
,
1
5
4
$2
,
1
9
9
,
4
8
6
10
,
7
6
2
10
To
t
a
l
Nl
A
$4
,
9
7
8
,
5
8
9
$4
,
5
9
3
,
1
9
3
Nl
A
10
Ir
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

P
e
a
k

R
e
w
a
r
d
s
20
0
4
58
$3
,
7
1
4
$1
8
5
,
0
0
6
5,
5
9
7
10
(1
)
20
0
5
89
4
$1
,
4
6
,
2
8
2
$4
7
9
,
4
8
4
40
,
3
2
3
10
(2
)
20
0
90
6
$1
,
3
2
4
,
4
1
8
$2
3
9
,
9
7
7
31
,
8
3
6
10
(3
)
20
0
7
94
7
$1
,
6
1
5
,
8
8
1
$2
3
9
,
8
5
5
37
,
4
4
1
10
(3
)
To
t
a
l
Nl
A
$4
,
7
5
3
,
2
9
5
$1
,
1
4
4
,
3
2
2
Nl
A
10
()o3"0Dl::-.
(a
)

N
o
m
l
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
l
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

I
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

c
o
s
t

i
s

th
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

vi
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

:
:

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
l
u
d
i
n
g

ir
r
g
a
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a

D
e
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t

w
h
e
r

p
r
r
a

k
W

r
e
u
c
t
o
n
.
i
s

d
o
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r

d
e
a
n
d

r
e
p
o
n
s
e

I
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(1
)

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
s
t

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r

$
3
2
0
,
3
0
9

i
n

p
r
o
r

h
i
s
t
o
r
l

r
e
p
o
i
n
g

to

r
e
e
c
t

a
l
l

f
u
n
d
i
n
g

s
o
u
r
c
.
(2
)

P
e
a
k

k
W

a
c
h
i
e
v

b
a

o
n
m
l
d
-

l
o
a

r
e
u
c
i
o
n

s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
.
(3
)

M
a
m
u
m

s
U
m
m
e
r

p
e
k

k
W

a
c
h
i
e
v
e
d
.
o CD3 Dl
::a.ienei CD s:Dl::Dl
co CD3 CD::-
"Ui:
lC CD 0100 ):5 ~l ~o-.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
To
t
a
l

Co
s
t
s
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
!
f
)
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
Pa
r
t
l
c
l
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
W
)

(
k
W
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
ut
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
/
W
h
)

(
$
/
W
h
)
Ut
i
l
l
t
c
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
-(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
20
0
7
$9
,
2
7
5
To
t
l
$9
,
2
1
5
En
$
r

H
o
u
s
e

C
a
l
l
s
20
0
3
42
0
$1
6
7
,
0
7
6
$1
6
7
,
0
7
6
60
2
,
7
2
3
69
20
$0
.
0
2
3
$0
.
0
2
3
(4
)
20
0
1,
7
0
8
$7
2
5
,
9
8
1
$7
2
5
,
9
8
1
2,
3
4
9
,
7
8
3
26
8
20
$0
.
0
2
5
$0
.
0
2
5
(5
)
20
0
5
89
1
$3
7
5
,
6
1
0
$3
7
5
,
6
1
0
1,
7
7
5
,
7
7
0
20
3
20
$0
.
0
1
7
$0
.
0
1
7
20
0
81
9
$3
3
6
,
7
0
1
$3
3
6
,
7
0
1
77
7
,
2
4
4
89
20
$0
.
0
3
5
$0
.
0
3
5
20
0
7
70
0
$3
3
6
,
3
7
2
$3
3
,
3
7
2
69
9
.
8
9
9
80
20
$0
.
0
3
9
$0
.
0
3
9
To
t
l
4,
5
3
8
$1
,
9
4
1
,
7
4
0
$1
,
9
4
1
,
7
4
0
8,
2
0
5
,
4
1
9
70
8
20
$0
.
0
2
8
$0
.
0
2
8
(e
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

on

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u

f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s
2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

en
e
r
g
y

e
f
l
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

To
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
i
b
e
r
s
,
w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
e
pa
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a
D
S
M

p
r
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

as

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

"
A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

/
8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

O
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
m

k
W
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f
k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(4
)

U
t
i
l
t
y

c
o
s
t

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r
m

$
1
8
3
,
6
5
3

i
n

p
r
i
o
r

h
i
s
t
o
r
c
a
l

r
e
p
r
t
i
n
g
.
(5
)

U
t
i
i
t

c
o
t

r
e
s
t
a
e
d

f
r
m

$
7
2
5
.
7
3
2

i
n

p
r
i
o
r

h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l

r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
.
o CD3i:::a.ene:CD s:
i:::i:
lC CD3 CD::-a:
i:=ro "U ~..('o3'Ci:::-.
;i::::c:~æ"to;:I\oo--"0 Q)
CO CDui
(0
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.
5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
n
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
õ:Q)::o "0o ~..("o3"tQ)::o.
(e
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l

I
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u

f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
i
e
n
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
e
n
t
a
L
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t

a
c
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t

cu
s
t
o
m
e
r

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

De
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

/
8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
m

k
W
r
e
u
e
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
p
o
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
v
e
.
(6
)

E
n
e
r
g
y

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

N
E
E
A

s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
i
z
e
d

p
e
r

h
o
m
e

k
W
h

s
a
v
i
n
g
.
(7
)

R
e
v
i
s
e
d

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

h
o
m
e
s

r
e
p
r
t
e
d

c
e
r
t
e
d

t
o

2
0
0

f
r
o
m

2
0
3

t
o

a
l
i
g
n

w
i
t
h

i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
s

r
e
a
l
i
z
e
,

a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d
.
(8
)

U
t
i
l
i
t

c
o
t
s

a
n
d

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
u
r
c

c
o
t
s

a
r
e

o
v
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
d

b
y

$
1
,
5
0
0

d
u
e

t
o

p
a
y
m
e
n
t

e
r
r
r
s
;

s
a
v
i
n
g

a
n
d

l
e
v
l
l
z
e

c
o
s
t

h
a
v
e

b
e
n

a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d

t
o

r
e
f
l
e
c

c
e
r
t
e
d

h
o
m
e
s

o
n
l
y
.
Cl
CD3 Q)::a.
iena:
CD s:Q)::Q)
co CD3 CD::-
"U Q)
lC CD (Jo ~:ii:!l l 8"'
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
o
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
o CD3 Q)::0-Wa:
CD s:Q)::Q)
lC CD3 CD::-
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
a
l

i
n
p
u
t

f
r
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o

e
n
e
r

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
n
t
a
L
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

pr
o
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
e
c

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
n
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
s
s

m
u
l
t
p
l
e

y
e
a
l
'
.
(C
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

fo

a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

po
i
n
t

of

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

An
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

/
8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
u
d
i
n
g

i
m
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n

Î
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(9
)

U
t
i
l
i
t

c
o
t

r
e
f
l
e
c

c
o
l
l
e
c
e
d

f
u
n
d
s

o
n

p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s

b
a
d

l
o
n

w
r
e
o
f
f
.
(1
0
)

Ut
i
l
í
y

C
Q
t

r
e
f
l
s

o
n
l
y

a
u
d
i
t

a
n
d

a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

c
o
t
s
;

t
h
e
r
e

w
a
s

n
o

fu
r
t
h
e
r

a
c
t
i
v
t
i
y

i
n

2
0
0
6
.
(1
1

)

Le
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n

in
c
u
d
e

b
a
d

·

lo
a
n

w
r
t
e
o
f
f

e
x
p
n
s
e

a
n
d

.
f
u
n
d
s

c
o
l
l
e
t
e
d

f
r
m

l
o
a
n
s

p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y

w
n
t
e
n

o
f
f
.
(1
2
)

Ut
i
l
t
y

c
o
t

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r

$
3
7
,
3
1
9

t
o

r
e
f
l
c
t

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
s
e
.
e:Q):ro "U ~..("o3-0 Q)::-.
):
:J:Jc:!l ~"8;:I\oo-.~CO(1 O'..
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
ã:Q)::o "U ~..("o3"tQ)
:J-.
(ø
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e

c
o
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t

f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
a
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
y

e
f
f
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
e
n
t
a
L
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

r
e
f

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
r
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
s

m
u
l
t
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.

.
(e
)

T
h

T
o
t
a
l

u
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o

a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r
o

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(8
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e

I

8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r

p
r
o
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
u
m
e
n
t
e
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
a
n
d

r
e
p
o
n
s

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(1
3
)

E
n
e
r
g

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d

f
o
r

a
c
u
a
l

s
a
l
e

o
f

6
5
,
4
3

b
u
l
b
s

f
r

3
5
,
0
0
,

w
i
t
h

m
e
a
s
u
r
e

li
f
e

r
e
v
i
s
e
d

t
0
7

f
r

9

y
e
a
r
s
.
Cl
(13 Q):JC.
ena:
(1 s:Q):J Q)
co(13(1:J-
"UII
CO CD ~;i::::c~l 8..
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
o CD3II::0-
roa:
CD s:II::II
co CD3 CD::-
To
t
a
l

Co
s
t
s
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
Pa
r
t
l
c
l
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
(k
V
l
)
(a
k
W
)

(
k
W
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
/
V
l
)

(
$
/
W
h
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
-(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Ut
l
l
i
t
c
)
-(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

ef
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
n
t
a
L
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(C
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

co
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

fo
r
a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

of

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(1
4
)

T
o
t
a

Re
s
o
u
r
c

C
o
s
t
s

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

i
n

2
0
0
5

t
o

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

f
e
d
e
r
a
l

f
u
n
d
i
n
g

a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
e
r
e

b
y
.

C
A
P

a
g
e
n
c
e
s
;

2
0
0
3

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

n
o
t

r
e
p
o
e
d

d
u
e

t
o

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

f
u
e
l

t
y
p
e
s
.
(1
.
5
)

B
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g

i
n

2
0
0
5
,

S
P
A

f
u
n
d
s

w
e
r
e

n
o

l
o
n
g
e
r

a
p
p
l
i
e
d

t
o

C
A
P

a
g
n
c
y

p
a
y
m
e
n
t
s
.

S
P
A

e
x
p
n
s
e

I
n

s
u
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t

y
e
a
r
s

i
s

r
e
e
c
e
d

i
n

t
h
e

r
e
t
i
v
e

s
t
a
e

e
X
p
e
n
s
e
s
.
õ:
II::o "U ~..("o3"0II::-.
"Ui:
lC CD ~~i :il 8..
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.
5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
l
z
e
d
To
t
a
l

Co
s
t
s

Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Co
s
t
s
l
a
)
An
n
u
a
l
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Pe
a
k
Me
a
s
u
r
e
To
t
l
Pa
r
t
l
c
i
p
a
n
t
(
b
)
Ut
i
l
l
t
y
l
c
)
Re
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
En
e
r
g
y
De
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
Li
f
e
To
t
a
i

U
t
i
l
i
t
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
W
)
(k
W
)
(Y
e
s
r
s
)
($
/
W
h
)
($
I
k
W
h
)
Ea
s
y

U
p
g
r
a
d
s
20
0
$3
1
.
8
1
9
$3
1
.
8
1
9
20
0
7
10
4
$7
1
1
,
4
9
4
$1
,
8
8
2
,
0
3
5
5,
1
8
3
,
6
4
0
59
2
78
0
12
$0
.
0
1
5
$0
.
0
4
0
To
t
a
l
10
4
$7
4
3
,
3
1
3
$1
,
9
1
3
,
8
5
5,
1
8
3
,
6
4
59
2
78
0
12
$0
.
0
1
5
$0
.
0
4
0
Or
e
o
n

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
l
Au
d
i
t

(
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

8
2
)
20
0
3
21
$4
,
0
0
20
0
7
20
0
5
7
$5
,
4
5
0
$5
,
5
0
20
0
6
20
0
7
8
$1
,
9
8
1
$1
,
9
8
1
(1
6
)
To
t
l
49
$7
,
4
3
1
$1
1
,
4
3
1
(i
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
i
i
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
L
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(c
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r
e
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
l
"

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

/
8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
l
"
.

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

irr
g
a
t
i
o
n

de
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k
,

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r

p
r
o
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(1
6
)

.

T
h
i
s

i
s

a
n

O
r
e
g
n

s
t
a
u
t
o
r
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
.

T
h
e

c
o
p
a
n
y

d
o
e
s

n
o
t

m
o
n
i
t
o
r

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

a
u
d
i
t

r
e
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

t
h
u
s

d
o
e
s

n
o
t

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

s
a
i
l
i
n
g
s

f
o
r

t
h
i
s
pr
o
r
a
m
.

A
u
d
i
t

e
x
p
e
n
s
e

n
o
t

i
n
v
o
l
v
i
n
g

o
u
t
s
i
d
e

c
o
n
t
r
c
t
o
r

s
e
e
s

a
r
e

b
o
o
k
e
d

t
o

g
e
n
e
r
a
l

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

s
e
M
c
e
.

S
i
x

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

s
e
M
c
e

a
u
d
i
t
s

w
e
r
e

c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d

i
n

2
0
0
.
o CD3i:::a.ene:
CD s:
i:::i:
lC CD3 CD::-a:i:::o "U ~..()o3~::-.
):
::::c~::CD"'o;:I\oo-."'II CO CD cr(J
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
To
t
l

Co
s
t
s

Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
An
n
u
a
l
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Pe
a
k
Me
a
s
u
r
e
To
t
a
l
Pa
r
t
c
l
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
Ut
i
i
t
y
c
)
Re
s
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
En
e
r
De
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
a
n
d
(
f
)
Li
f
To
t
a
l

U
t
l
i
t
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
r
a
m
I
e
a
r
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(d
o
l
a
r
s
)
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
W
)
(k
W
)
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
($
'
W
h
)
($
'
W
h
)
or
e
n

S
c
h
o

E
f
f
i
c
n
c
y
20
0
5
0
$8
$8
20
0
6
$2
4
,
3
7
9
$8
9
,
7
7
1
22
3
,
3
6
25
12
$0
.
0
1
2
$0
.
0
4
To
t
a
l
8
$2
4
,
4
8
5
$8
9
,
8
6
22
3
,
3
"
26
12
$0
.
0
1
2
$0
.
0
4
(1
7
)
20
0
3
$1
3
0
3
$1
,
3
0
3
0
20
0
1
$1
1
2
,
3
1
1
$1
3
3
,
4
4
1
21
1
,
2
9
5
24
12
$0
.
0
5
8
$0
.
0
6
9
(1
8
)
20
0
5
24
$1
,
1
2
8
.
0
7
6
$3
,
6
5
3
.
1
5
2
12
,
0
1
6
,
6
7
8
1,
3
7
2
12
$0
.
0
1
0
$0
.
0
3
3
20
0
40
$1
.
6
2
5
,
2
1
6
$4
,
2
7
3
.
8
8
5
19
.
2
1
1
,
6
0
5
2,
1
9
3
12
$0
.
0
0
9
$0
.
0
2
4
20
0
7
49
$3
,
1
6
1
,
8
6
.
$
7
,
0
1
2
,
6
8
29
,
7
8
9
,
3
0
4
3,
4
0
1
3.
6
2
2
12
$0
.
0
1
2
$0
.
0
2
6
To
t
a
l
11
4
$6
,
0
2
8
,
7
7
1
$1
5
,
0
7
4
,
4
8
7
61
,
2
2
8
,
8
8
2
6,
9
9
0
3,
6
2
2
12
$0
.
0
1
1
$0
.
0
2
7
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l

l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
y

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
r
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.

.
(c
)

T
h

T
o
t
a
l

u
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

O
S
M
p
r
o
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
e
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
m

t
h
e

p
o
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
.
(8
)

A
v
e
r
a

De
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
ù
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

I

8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
n

d
e
m
å
n
d

r
e
u
c
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a

D
e
a
n
d

i
s

re
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r

p
r
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
o
n

I
s

d
o
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
.
(1
7
)

E
n
e
r
g

i
n
c
n
t
i
e
s

o
f

$
6
.
6
7
4

w
e

p
a
i
d

fo
r

th
i
s

p
r
o
r
a

u
n
d
e
r

th
e

E
a
s
y

U
p
g
r
a
e
s

p
r
r
a
m
.
.
(1
8
)

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y

r
e
p
o
e
d

e
x
s
e

a
n
d

e
n
e
r
g

i
n
c
l
u
d

a
c
r
u
e
d

a
m
o
u
n
t
s
,

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

h
e
e

t
o

a
l
i
g
n

w
i
t
h

a
c
u
n
t
n
g

r
e
r
d
s
.
ã:II:;o "'~..()o3"'II::-.o CD3II::c.&ie.CD :sII::IIco CD3 CD::-
""C)
co CD ~5'
::C~f;:I\~
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
l
z
e
d
To
t
a
l

Co
s
t
s

sa
v
i
n
g
s
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
An
n
u
a
l
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Pe
a
k
Me
a
s
u
r
e
To
t
a
l
Pa
r
t
i
c
l
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
Ut
i
l
l
t
(
c
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
En
e
r
g
y
De
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
Li
f
e
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
r
a
m
I
Y
e
a
r
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(d
o
l
a
r
s
)
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
"
,
(k
"
,
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
($
!
W
h
)
($
!
W
h
)
Ir
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y
Pr
o
r
a
20
0
3
2
$4
1
,
0
8
9
$5
,
6
0
9
36
,
7
9
2
18
15
$0
.
1
0
6
$0
.
1
4
1
(1
9
)
20
0
33
$1
2
0
,
8
0
8
$4
2
,
9
7
8
80
2
,
8
1
2
44
9
15
$0
.
0
1
4
$0
.
0
4
8
(2
0
)
20
0
5
38
$1
5
0
,
5
n
$6
7
,
4
6
0
1,
0
1
2
,
8
8
3
40
1
15
$0
.
0
1
4
$0
.
0
6
2
20
0
55
9
$2
,
7
7
9
,
6
2
0
$8
,
5
1
4
,
2
3
1
16
,
9
8
6
,
0
0
8
1,
9
3
9
5,
1
0
0
8
$0
.
0
2
4
$0
.
0
7
3
(2
1
)
20
0
7
81
6
$2
,
0
0
1
,
9
6
1
$8
,
6
9
4
,
n
2
12
,
3
0
4
,
0
7
3
1,
4
0
5
3,
4
0
7
8
$0
.
0
2
4
$0
.
1
0
3
To
t
a
l
1,
4
4
$5
,
0
9
,
0
5
5
$1
8
,
3
2
4
,
0
5
0
31
,
1
4
2
,
_
3,
3
4
9,
3
7
6
8
$0
.
0
2
4
$0
.
0
8
6
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g

O
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
Tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
20
0
3
71
$4
8
,
8
5
3
$4
,
8
5
3
1,
8
2
5
,
0
0
20
8
5
$0
.
0
0
6
$0
.
0
0
(2
2
)
20
0
26
$4
3
,
9
6
9
$4
.
9
6
9
65
0
,
0
0
74
5
$0
.
0
1
4
$0
.
0
1
4
20
0
5
7
$1
,
7
5
0
$4
.
4
8
0
43
4
,
1
6
7
50
5
$0
.
0
0
1
$0
.
0
0
2
To
t
a
l
10
4
$9
4
,
5
7
2
$9
7
,
3
0
2
2,
9
0
9
,
1
6
7
33
2
5
$0
.
0
0
7
$0
.
0
0
7
(s
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t

f
r
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

p
l
a
n

a
n
d
c
a
l
C
\
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
U
d
e

l
i
n
e

lo
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

fo
r

D
e
a
n
d

Re
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

ac
o
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

ye
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

u
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
C
\
r
r
e
d

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
r
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
e
.
(è
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

1
8
;
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

no
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(1
9
)

R
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r

$
1
1
,
1
9
0
.
(2
0
)

O
n
g
i
n
a
l
l
y

r
e
p
o
r
t

e
x
p
n
s
e

a
n
d

e
n
e
r
g
y

i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d

a
c
c
r
u
e
d

a
m
o
u
n
t
,

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

h
e
r
e

t
o

a
l
i
g
n

w
i
h

a
c
u
n
t
i
n
g

r
e
r
d
s
.
(2
1
)

.

M
e
s
u
r
e

U
f
e

i
s

w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d

l
i
f
e

(
b
a
s
e
d

o
n

en
e
r
g
y

s
a
v
i
n
g
s
)

o
f

c
u
s
t
o
m

op
i
o
n

(
1
5

ye
a
r
s
)

a
n
d

m
e
n
u

o
p
t
i
o
n
s

(5

ye
a
r
s
)
.
(2
2
)

.

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

e
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

e
n
e
r
g
y

i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d

a
c
c
e
d

a
m
o
u
n
t
s
;

2
0
0
3

r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d

f
r
o

$
3
8
,
0
8
,

2
0
0
4

r
e
t
a
t
e
d

f
r
o

$
4
,
8
5
3
.
o CD3 C)::a.ena:
CD s:C)::C)
co CD3 CD::-ã:C)::o ""~..("o3"'C)::
-o
~::::i:a1 ~'8;:I\oo~'"0)
(C CD 0)~
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
.
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7
'

(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
l
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
0-0)::o '"~..("o3"C0)::-.
Pr
o
r
a
m
I
e
a
r
To
t
a
l

Co
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
e

P
e
a
k
De
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
(a
k
~

(
k
~
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Li
f
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l

U
t
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
/
W
h
)

(
$
/
W
h
)
Co
m
m
e
r
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
o
n
In
i
t
i
a
v
e
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y
In
i
t
i
a
t
v
e
DS
M

D
i
r
e

P
r
o
r
a
m
Ov
e
r
h
d
Pa
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Ut
l
i
t
C
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
y
(k
\
M
)
Re
s
u
r
e
(
d
)
(d
o
l
J
a
r
s
)
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
$3
,
9
7
$4
,
6
6
3
$2
6
,
8
2
3
$3
4
,
9
8
3
$3
,
4
9
7
$4
.
6
6
3
$2
6
.
8
2
3
$3
,
9
8
3
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
a
l

i
n
p
u

f
r
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a

r
e
s
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o

e
n
e
r
y

e
f
f
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
s
e

p
r
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
r
i
b
e
.

w
h
i
c
h

.
m
a
y

r
e
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
s

m
u
l
t
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.

.
(e
)

T
h

T
o
t
l

U
t
i
l
i
t

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h

T

a
t
a
l

R
e
s
u
r
c

c
o
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y
/
a
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
i
n
g

i
m
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
o
n
.
(I
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

pr
o
r
a
m

k
W
r
e
u
c
t
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
n

o
f

k
W

f
r

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
o
20
0
5
20
0
To
t
a
l
$2
1
,
5
5
2
$2
4
,
3
0
6
$4
,
8
5
8
$4
3
,
9
6
9
$2
4
,
3
0
6
$6
,
2
7
5
o
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
$5
6
,
9
0
9
$5
,
9
0
9
o
o CD30)::0-00a:CD s:0)::0)
(C CD3 CD::-
lJni
co CD 0)
(X 5'
::i:9i l 8..
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
To
t
a
l

C
o
t
s
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
l
z
e
d
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
o CD3ni::a.iena:
CD~ni::ni
co CD3 CD::-
Pr
o
r
a
m
N
e
a
r
Pa
r
t
l
c
l
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
UU
l
i
t
(
c
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
An
n
u
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
(k
W
h
)
sa
v
i
n
g
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e

P
e
a
k
Oe
m
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Uf
e
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
To
t
a
l
To
t
l
l
J
l
l
i
t

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
($
/
W
h
)

(
$
/
W
h
)
20
0
3
20
0
20
0
5
20
0
20
0
7
To
t
a
l
o
$6
7
,
0
1
2
$1
0
8
,
1
9
1
$1
0
1
.
1
7
7
$1
2
4
,
9
5
6
$3
1
,
6
4
5
$4
2
,
9
8
1
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
In
i
t
a
t
v
e
20
0
5
20
0
To
t
a
l
o
$7
,
4
9
8
$5
6
,
7
2
7
$6
4
,
2
2
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(a
k
W
)

(
k
W
)
$6
7
,
0
1
2
$1
0
8
,
1
9
1
$1
0
1
.
1
7
7
$1
2
4
,
9
5
6
$3
1
,
6
4
5
$4
2
,
9
8
1
$7
,
4
9
8
$5
,
7
2
7
$6
,
2
5
5
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
s

f
r
o

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0
6

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
m
e
n
t
a
L
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
r
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(c
)

T
h

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

co
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
s
t

I
s

t
h

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r

a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

1
8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
n
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
é
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
a:ni::o lJ ~.,Cìo3'tni::i.
)::i:ic:!!~'8;:I\oo..1J Q)
(C CD Ol
CO
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
To
t
a
l

C
o
s
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
An
n
u
a
l
Av
e
r
a
e
Pe
a
k
Me
a
s
u
r
e
To
t
l
Pa
n
i
c
l
p
a
n
t
s
(
b
)
Ut
i
l
i
t
e
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
d
)
En
e
r
g
y
De
m
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
ut
To
t
a
l

U
t
l
i
t
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(d
o
l
a
r
s
)
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
W
)
(k
W
)
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
($
l
l
t
)
($
l
l
t
)
Lo
c
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

E
f
f
e
n
c
y
Fu
n
d
s
20
0
3
56
$5
,
1
0
0
$5
,
1
0
0
(2
3
)
20
0
0
$2
3
,
4
4
9
$2
3
,
4
4
9
20
0
5
2
$1
4
.
8
9
6
$2
6
,
7
5
6
78
,
0
0
0
9
10
$0
.
0
2
4
$0
.
0
4
2
20
48
0
$3
,
4
5
9
$3
,
4
5
9
19
.
0
2
7
2
7
$0
.
0
0
9
$0
.
0
0
9
(2
4
)
20
0
7
1
$7
,
5
2
0
$7
,
5
2
0
9,
0
0
0
1
7
$0
.
1
3
5
$0
.
1
3
5
To
t
l
53
9
$5
4
.
4
2
4
$6
6
.
2
8
4
10
6
.
0
2
1
12
9
$0
.
0
6
$0
.
0
8
1
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e

o
n

f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u

f
r
o

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

e
n
a
r
g
y

e
f
f
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
s
e

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
r
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

a
c
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

y
e
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h

T
o
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

co
s
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

O
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c

c
o
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
n
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o
r
a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r

t
h

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

vi
e
w

o
f

I
P
C

a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

e
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
g
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y
/
8
.
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

p
r
m

k
W

r
e
d
u
c
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

n
o
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(2
3
)

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

E
d
u
c
a
o
n

I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e

c
o
s
t
s

w
e
r
e

a
l
l
o
e
d

a
m
o
n
g

a
l
l

r
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

f
o

2
0
0
7
.
(2
4
)

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
n
s

b
a

o
n

d
i
r
e
c
t

p
r
o
r
a
m

c
o
s
t

o
n
l
y

(
$
1
.
0
0
)

a
s
s
t
e
d

w
i

s
p
e
i
a
l

C
F
L

t
r
e
s
h
o
w

d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
.
a:Q)
:To 1J ~..('o3"C Q):i-.o CD3 Q):ia.iena:
CD s:Q):i Q)
(C CD3 CD:i-
"U Q)
co CD..o ):êat ~~8..
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

4
.
.

.

5
-
Y
e
a
r

D
S
M

E
x
p
e
n
s
e

a
n
d

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

2
0
0
3
-
2
0
0
7

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
No
m
i
n
a
l

L
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d
To
t
a
l

Co
s
t
s

sa
v
i
n
g
s
Co
s
t
s
(
a
)
An
n
u
a
l
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Pe
a
k
Me
a
s
u
r
e
To
t
a
l
Pa
r
t
l
c
l
p
a
n
t
(
b
)
UU
l
i
t
c
)
Re
s
o
u
r
c
(
d
)
En
e
r
g
y
De
a
n
d
(
e
)

D
e
m
a
n
d
(
f
)
Li
f
e
To
t
a
l

U
t
i
l
i
t
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
r
a
m
l
Y
e
a
r
(N
u
m
b
e
r
)
(d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
(d
o
l
a
r
s
)
(k
W
h
)
(a
k
W
)
(k
W
)
(Y
e
a
r
s
)
($
I

kW
h
)

($
!
W
h
)
NE
E
A
20
0
3
$1
,
2
9
2
.
7
4
8
$1
,
2
9
2
,
7
4
8
12
,
0
5
0
,
1
5
7
1,
3
7
6
20
0
$1
,
2
5
6
,
6
1
1
$1
,
2
5
6
,
6
1
1
13
,
5
4
5
,
8
9
6
1,
5
4
6
20
0
5
$4
7
6
,
8
9
1
$4
7
6
,
8
9
1
16
,
2
9
7
,
2
3
5
1,
8
6
(2
5
)
20
0
$9
3
0
,
4
5
5
$9
3
0
,
4
5
5
22
,
3
3
7
,
4
7
7
2,
5
5
0
(2
6
)
20
0
7
$8
9
3
,
3
4
0
$8
9
3
,
3
4
28
,
6
0
1
,
4
1
0
3,
2
6
5
(2
6
)
To
t
l
0
$4
,
8
5
,
0
4
$4
,
8
5
0
,
0
4
92
,
8
3
2
,
1
7
4
10
,
5
9
7
20
0
3
0
$2
,
5
8
,
2
2
9
$3
,
1
1
9
,
6
0
18
,
7
1
2
,
9
1
9
2,
1
3
2
18
9
20
$3
,
8
0
7
,
8
8
8
$4
,
8
8
,
8
3
7
19
,
4
1
9
,
8
0
5
2,
1
2
5
8,
5
3
8
20
5
$8
,
5
2
3
,
3
4
9
$9
,
3
5
8
,
8
2
0
37
,
8
5
3
,
0
4
4,
2
0
5
44
,
0
3
4
20
$1
1
,
1
7
4
,
1
8
1
$1
9
,
7
8
1
,
6
3
3
70
,
7
8
5
,
8
2
5
8,
0
7
8
43
,
7
9
0
20
7
$1
4
,
8
9
8
,
8
1
8
$2
5
,
9
3
8
,
5
5
0
91
,
1
4
3
,
7
8
1
10
,
4
0
4
57
,
0
7
2
To
t
a
l

D
i
r
e
t

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
0
$3
8
,
9
8
,
2
8
3
$8
2
,
8
8
7
,
4
9
23
7
,
8
9
5
,
1
5
8
27
,
1
5
7
15
1
,
8
2
1
(a
)

N
o
m
i
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
i
z
e
d

c
o
s
t
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e

o
n

f
l
n
a
n
c
i
a
l

i
n
p
u
t
s

f
r
o
m

I
P
C
'
s

2
0
0

i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d

r
e
s
o
u
r
c

p
l
a
n

a
n
d

ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

l
i
n
e

l
o
s
s
e
s
.
(b
)

P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t

t
o
t
a
l
s

f
O
!

e
n
e
r

e
f
f
i
e
n
c
y

p
r
o
r
a
m
s

a
r
e

i
n
c
r
e
e
n
t
a
l
.

T
o
t
a
l
s

f
o
r

D
e
m
a
n
d

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

r
e
f
l
e
c
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

s
u
b
s
c
i
b
e
r
s
,

w
h
i
c
h

m
a
y

r
e
p
r
e
s
e
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
pa
r
t
i
c
l
p
a
n
t
a
c
s
s

m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e

ye
a
r
s
.
(e
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

u
t
i
l
i
t
y

c
o
t

i
s

a
l
l

c
o
t

i
n
c
u
r
r

b
y

I
P
C

t
o

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

a

D
S
M

p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
(d
)

T
h
e

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r

c
o
t

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

e
x
p
d
i
t
u
r
e

f
o

a

p
r
o
r
a
m

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

v
i
e
w

o
f

I
P
C
a
n
d

i
t
s

c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s

a
s

a

w
h
o
l
e
.
(e
)

A
v
e
r
a
e

D
e
m
a
n
d

=

A
n
n
u
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

/
8
,
7
6
0

a
n
n
u
a
l

h
o
u
r
s
,

e
x
c
U
d
i
n
g

i
r
r
g
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
(f
)

S
u
m
m
e
r

P
e
a
k

D
e
m
a
n
d

i
s

re
p
o
r
t
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

pr
o
g
r
a
m

k
W

r
e
u
c
i
o
n

i
s

d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
.

R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

k
W

f
r
o
m

d
e
m
a
n
d

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

i
s

no
t

a
d
d
i
t
i
v
e
.
(2
5
)

E
n
e
r
g

is

r
e
s
t
a
e
d

f
r
o
m

2
0
0
5

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

o
f

2
0
,
0
5
3
,
7
5
6

k
W
h
.
(2
6
)

E
n
e
r
g

i
s

a

p
r
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
o CD3 Q)=i0.
iena:CD~Q)=i Q)
co CD3 CD=i-e:Q)::o "U ~~("o3'0 Q)=i
'c
Idaho Power Company Demand-Side Management
r:r:~~
.
i - e ~l g1i-l- I ~QlE~i Il IIUI- ~~Ql
.5l! u 5 ~ëE:i i0
l ~Z Q.!
¡;!t!E
¡ iI Cl l .~l..~:I ..:i
øi l "t
E:j i~.i ~.i:g. .l j .f!· E ~Q. i!;:Ji =UIlii 0
8.;:j.i i i:li:.II i: "~II fI~t! C II
1i 1I ~i:
i il ~,g ë !II..Ql l-.!i'0 .a UI
CD E
í:i l!I!;:r:If ~f uII+=~:i ~r:II ~gi:
l8C C ~l 'õ "8oCwClg-Ql 0 l l..e gi 9:l0i'õ ai~ex "t !i:0 "t I i:ieilt!!i:II
l
1I 's i "Ò('::,g E 'õ !
J :g i!"t J!~0 .l É ë i:i:0 -...I!'s,.12 CD -N
B l s ii E ..ai ;:S
~.!e ~ai
.§~.~Q.:e aili:r:::E ai .f!l!~0 v a ..l"IS ø ~l"li CI ('~.g i:tV l t!..('co II Gl ..
i ~~lš Iêl-eo ~II ....N Gl q,l"l,g cõ cõ r:ø)~-i i !~Ñ II !
L g:g ..v 0 ::.g fß ..fi C'ø
~
ëfßfßfßÑ:i lI .,E CD ~l ~......i !---.....gCD--U Q.;:~.EQ.~.5 l 11 .,'0 :õ !~E jQ.II S l lr:1 't .5 UI !l!tV :i E 0 i:fl0;È i:
CD B.~l!9:II :iUJü~l!~1;i ~;Õr:i!i¡Q.
~ftCD..j i:
Co :.6 g -
ix1.!!.~l ~~w C'i i.
!§
..j l"i II i ..
~ ¡~8 8 ~!!8 11 l l l i::('('('~N -w!::. '"u ii i:en fil .f!.f!l..11 'i
§
;:c l l
i:~ii ~.!i:i-Õ -c 11 ¡tV Is E §~
n lCD"t
l
- UI "ti:is ~);11 Ii z; 0 i:11 ~l.1 0 == gi E
L ~..:t j¡ëë 5 ex i!:€ii ii 11..llll Ql ...!
¡l !~~õ ~~II
)C 'ü'ü l-f:a ::l !g 'E 'E CD .i El!If II f3 f3 ;:c ~~~z en
&ê ~-:g r:Q.~~s ~a.c(
Annual Report 2007 Page 71