Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090206PacifiCorp Motion.pdfJohn R. Hammond, Jr., ISB No. 5470 Local Counsel FISHER PUSCH & ALDERMAN, LLP U S Ban Plaza, 5th Floor 101 South Capitol Boulevard P.O. Box 1308 Boise, Idaho 83701 (208) 331-1000 (208) 331-2400 facsimile jrh(ifpa-law.com.com RECEi\! iOß9 fEß -5 Pr\ 4: S6 Mark C. Moench Daniel E. Solander 201 South Main, Suite 2300 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 220-4014 FAX: (801) 220-3299 Email: mark.moenchQlacifícorp.com daniel.solander~pacificorp.com Attorneys for Rocky Mountain Power BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT PETITION TO APPROVE A STIPULATION TO ADJUST PUBLISHED AVOIDED COST RATES ) ) CASE NO. GNR-E-08-02 ) ) MOTION TO CONTINUE ) DECISION IMPLEMENTING ) STIPULATION ) COMES NOW, Rocky Mountain Power, a division of PacifiCorp (the "Company"), and hereby requests that the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (the "Commission") stay its decision implementing the Stipulation entered into by and among Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power"), the Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities -- Commission ("Staff'), A vista Corporation ("A vista"), PacifiCorp ("PacifiCorp"), the~ :2 United States Deparment of Energy ("DOE"), U.S. Geothermal Inc. ("U.S.-(!-Ct o MOTION TO CONTINE DECISION IMPLEMENTING STIPULATION - 1 Geothermal"), Exergy ("Exergy"), Tuana Springs Energy LLC ("Tuana"), and Glen Ikemoto. Rocky Mountain Power is concerned that the overall Qualifying Facility ("QF") avoided cost price that the surrogate avoided resource ("SAR") methodology yields is too high, and accordingly, requests that the Commission stay the implementation of the Stipulation until the Parties have had a chance to discuss the effects that the curent economic downtrend wil have on the avoided cost price in Idaho. Alternatively, if the Commission determines it necessar to approve avoided costs based on the current Northwest Planning and Conservation Council's ("NPCC") forecast, Rocky Mountain Power requests that these avoided cost rates apply to small non-fuel projects of one megawatt or less. 1. On November 5, 2008, the Paries executed a Stipulation in which they agreed on the non-fuel related costs of the SAR methodology for determining avoided cost prices for QFs in Idaho. The Paries noted in the Stipulation that the fuel related costs in the SAR have a much greater impact on the published rates than the non-fuel related costs. 2. Although the Company agreed with the Stipulation's logic for computing and updating capital costs, heat rate, and O&M Costs in the SAR methodology, the Company is now concerned that the overall avoided cost price that the SAR methodology yields is too high. 3. The assumptions underlying the avoided cost prices in the Januar 26,2009, draft paper are representative of elevated pricing and bullish economic perceptions that are not representative of the dramatic recessionar environment that is forecast by most experts to be deep and long. The primar, but not sole drver to the high QF avoided costs in the MOTION TO CONTINE DECISION IMPLEMENTING STIPULATION - 2 Januar 26, 2009 draft paper is the result of using the NPCC Draft Fuel Prices for the Sixth Power Plan, December 29,2008. 4. The Company believes that the medium natural gas price cure from NPCC yields an avoided cost that is too high, and is not a tre reflection of current forward natural gas market prices and projections. The impact of using the draft medium NPCC fuel curve is approximately two-thirds of the 27% increase in the avoided costs and the Company feels that warants, at a minimum, postponing Commission approval of the gas curve component until the NPCC fuel prices are finaL. 5. Market forward prices for the balance of 2009 are considerably lower than even the low NPCC price forecast. Market forward prices in 2010 are most closely aligned with the low NPCC price forecast. Beyond 2010, the medium~low NPCC price forecast begins to align reasonably well with curent market forward prices. Over the entire NYEX strip, the NPCC medium case projection is considerably higher than current market. Given the NPCC's description of their low case forecasts, curent market "sign posts," and current market forwards, the Company believes that the low and medium-low NPCC price forecasts are a better indicator of current and projected market conditions than the medium case. 6. Just as the rapid decline in global economic conditions has influenced the natural gas market, the curent recessionar climate has led to extraordinar commodity price declines. With declining raw material prices, lower demand for electricity, and the potential for falling construction market premiums, the Company is concerned that the SAR capital cost assumptions may be also contributing to avoided cost prices that are too high. Presentation materials from the NPCC's Generating Resources Advisory MOTION TO CONTINE DECISION IMPLEMENTING STIPULATION - 3 Committee (GRAC) meeting on January 22, 2009, indicate that combined cycle plant costs are expected to decline in real terms over the entirety of their forecast horizon ("Uncertainty in the Regional Portfolio Model", slide 5). 7. The Company is also requesting that additional time be granted by the Commission in order to more thoroughly review all of the assumptions used in the NPCC forecast. Given the dramatic global economic downtur and extraordinary downward impact on commodity costs that has occured in the last few months, the Company questions the timing of an update that does not appear to reflect current market conditions and suggests the Commission consider updating the price forecast after conditions have become more stable. 8. An additional measure that might mitigate the impact of the use of the NPCC draft price curve would be to limit the size of QFs that are eligible for the published avoided cost price to 1 MW, rather than 10 MW, temporarly while the Commission considers the remainder of the issues raised by Rocky Mountain Power. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, Rocky Mountain Power respectfully requests: (l) that the Commission stay the implementation of the Stipulation in the above-captioned Docket; and (2) reevaluate its use of the. NPCC draft price cure before QF prices are established using these inflated costs so that Idaho customers are not impacted by potentially above market QF prices; or (3) limit the size of QFs eligible for the published rate to 1 MW. MOTION TO CONTINE DECISION IMLEMENTING STIPULATION - 4 DATED this 5th day of Februar, 2009. Respectfully submitted, Mark C. Moench Daniel E. Solander Attorneys for Rocky Mountain Power John . H mond, Jr:' Fis er PU$ch & Alderman LLP (J MOTION TO CONTINE DECISION IMPLEMENTING STIPULATION - 5 ~4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on theS day of February, 2009, I caused to be served a tre copy of the foregoing, by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Scott Woodbury Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 W. Washington (83702) P.O. Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0074 scott. woodburv(fÙpuc.idaho. gov Attorney for Commission Staff ( ) U.S. Mail ( ) Facsimile ( ) Overnight Delivery ( ~. Hand Delivery r 1 Email David J. Meyer, Clint Kalich Avista Corporation - MSC - 7 P.O. Box 3727 11411 E. Mission Street Spokane, WA 99220-3727 david.mever(iavi stacorp.com f\ U's. Mail ( ) Facsimile ( ) Overnight Delivery ( ) Hand Delivery ( ) Email Only Donovan E. Walker Baron L. Kline Idaho Power Company POBox 70 1221 W. Idaho Street (83702) Boise, ID 83707-0070 E-mail: dwalker~idahopower.com bkl ine(ci dahopower .com l\ U.S. Mail/( 1 Facsimile ( ) Overnight Delivery ( ) Hand Delivery ( ) Email Peter J. Richardson, Esq. Richardson & 0' Leary PLLC 515 N. 27th Street (83702) PO Box 7218 Boise,ID 83707- 1218 E-mail: peter~richardsonandoleary.com VI U.S. Mail ('1 Facsimile ( ) Overnight Delivery ( ) Hand Delivery ( ) Email TUANA SPRINGS ENERGY LLC Dean J. Miler McDevitt & Miler LLC 420 W. Banock Street (83702) POBox 2564 Boise, ID 83701 E-mail: ioe~mcdevitt-miller.com K U.S. Mail ( ) Facsimile ( ) Overnight Delivery ( ) Hand Delivery ( ) Email MOTION TO CONTIN DECISION IMPLEMENTING STIPULATION - 6 IDAHO WIN FARS LLC Glenn Ikemoto 672 Blair Avenue Piedmont, CA 94611 E-mail: glenncgmacbell.nct vr U.S. Mail t"3 Facsimile () Overnight Delivery ( ) Hand Delivery ( ) Email MOTION TO CONTINE DECISION IMLEMENTING STIPULATION - 7 /