Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191216final_order_no_34507.pdfOffice of the Secretary Service Date December 16,2019 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION )OF AVISTA CORPORATION DBA AVISTA )CASE NO.AVU-E-19-04 UTILITIES FOR AUTHORITY TO )INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR )ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ELECTRIC )ORDER NO.34507 CUSTOMERS IN THE STATE OF IDAHO ) On June 10,2019,Avista Corporation dba Avista Utilities ("Avista"or "Company") applied for authority to increase its rates for electric service in Idaho. The Commission issued a Notice of Application and granted intervention to the CommunityAction Partnership Association of Idaho,Inc.("CAPAI")and several other parties. See Order Nos.34368,34369,34374 and 34384. On October 15,2019,the parties submitted a Stipulation and Settlement ("Settlement") resolving all issues between them to the Commission for its review and approval.On October 28, 2019,the Company filed an amended Settlement that corrected minor errors in the original document.The Commission held public hearings and a technical hearing on the amended Settlement. On November 29,2019,after consideringthe record,the Commission issued Order No. 34499 approving the amended Settlement.On the same date,CAPAI timely filed a Petition for Intervenor Funding. CAPAPS PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING CAPAI's Petition for Intervenor Funding seeks an award of $14,160.00.See CAPAI's Petition for Intervenor Fundingat 3. CAPAI states it fullyparticipated in every aspect of this proceeding and provided input and asserted issues not raised by Staff and other parties,including requesting an increase to Avista's Low Income Weatherization Assistance program.Petition at 4.CAPAI claims that its position materially differed from that taken by Commission Staff.Id.For example,CAPAI asserts that it was the only party in the proceeding to advocate for the interests of low-income residential ORDER NO.34507 1 customers.Id.CAPAI asserts the intervenor funding requested is reasonable based on the foregoing and the experience of its counsel.Id.at 3-6. COMMISSION FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION Intervenor funding is available under Idaho Code §61-617A,which declares it is the "policy of [Idaho]to encourage participation at all stages of all proceedings before the commission so that all affected customers receive full and fair representation in those proceedings."The statute empowers the Commission to order any regulated utility with intrastate annual revenues exceeding $3.5 million to pay all or a portion of the costs of one or more parties for legal fees,witness fees and reproduction costs not to exceed a total for all intervening parties combined of $40,000.Id. The Commission's determination on an intervenor fundingrequest shall be based on the following considerations: (a)The intervenor's participation materiallycontributed to the Commission's decision; (b)The costs of intervention are reasonable in amount and would be a significant financial hardship for the intervenor; (c)The intervenor's recommendation differed materially from Commission's Staff's testimony and exhibits;and (d)The intervenor's testimony and participation addressed issues of concern to the general body of users or consumers. See Idaho Code §61-617A(2).To obtain an intervenor funding award,an intervenor must comply with Commission Rules of Procedure 161 through 165.Rule 162 provides the form and content for the petition.IDAPA 31.01.01.162. We find that CAPAI's Petition satisfies the intervenor funding requirements.CAPAI intervenedand participated in all aspects of the proceeding,with a focus on low-income customers. CAPAI's Petition shows CAPAI worked closely with Avista and Staff throughout the case. CAPAI noted its role in the Company agreeing to increase funding to the Low Income Weatherization Assistance Program. The Commission finds that CAPAI has materially contributed to the Commission's decision.CAPAI's recommendations materially differ from Staff's recommendations,and CAPAI's participation addressed issues of concern to the general body of customers.Finally,we ORDER NO.34507 2 find the costs and fees incurred by CAPAI are reasonable in amount,and that CAPAI,as a non- profit organization,would suffer financial hardship if the request is not approved. Accordingly,we find it reasonable to award CAPAI $14,160.00 in intervenor funding, with the amount to be recovered from Avista's residential electric customers. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that CAPAI's Petition for Intervenor Funding is granted in the amount of $14,160.00to be recovered from Avista's residential electric customers. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER.Any person interested in this Order may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21)days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order.Within seven (7)days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration,any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration.See Idaho Code §61- 626. DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise,Idaho this day of December 2019. PAUL KJ I ÀN ,PRESIDENT KRIhINE RÅÌER,C MMΊSIONER ERIC ANDERSON,COMMISSIONER ATTEST: Diane M.Hanian Commission Secretary I:\Legal\LORDERS\AVUE1904_jh_IntervenorFundingOrder.doc ORDER NO.34507 3