Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180510Comments (2).pdfDiane Holt From:phil16@reagan.com Sent:Thursday,May 10,2018 4:29 PM To:BeverlyBarker;Diane Holt;Matthew Evans Subject:Case Comment Form:Elizabeth Doering Name:Elizabeth Doering Case Number:Avista case Number AVU-E-17-Og Email:phil16@reagan.com Telephone: Address:6205 N Sunrise Terrace Coeur d'Alene Idaho,83815 Name of Utility Company:Avista Comment:Sirs: I question why a US utility would even be considered in a merger with a foreign entity.US utilityand power companies should remain totally in US control and ownership.This Canadiancompany,especially,seems to be managedvery poorly,and the reasoning behind the merger (to add renewable credits)does not agree with common sense.So called renewable energy sources are notoriously ineffective in power production,must be subsidized heavily and are a constant drain on the economy.Please do not let this merger go forward. Respectfully yours, Elizabeth Doering Unique Identifier:98.146.208.225 Diane Holt From:tomweems@hughes.net Sent:Wednesday,May 9,2018 6:24 PM To:Beverly Barker;Diane Holt;Matthew Evans Subject:Case Comment Form:Tom Weems Name:Tom Weems Case Number:AVU-E.-17-09 Email:tomweems@hughes.net Telephone:208-245-5018 Address:280 Casita Lane Calder Idaho,83808 Name of Utility Company:Avista Comment:I am very much against the selling of Avista to hydro one.Idaho needs to keep control of our own water and power.This is a very bad deal for us and shouldn't even be considered I Tom Unique Identifier:72.168.160.165 1