20130930Drake Exhibit 2.pdf

Avista Utilities
Demand Side
Management
Programs
Idaho
2010-2012
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AW-E-I3 AW-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Scfiedule 1, Page I of76
09-26-2013
Table of Contents
Residential Home lmprovement - Electric... ................3
Residential Home lmprovement - Natural Gas............. .................6
Residential New Construction - Electric..... ................. 9
Residential New Construction - Natural Gas............. ................... 10
Residential Energy Staro Homes - Electric... .............. 11
Residential Energy Starc Homes - Natural Gas ............. ................ 13
Residential tighting - Electric..... ............ 14
Residential Energy Staro Appliances - Electric and Natural Gas............. .........17
Residential Appliance Recycling - Electric .................20
Residential Geographic Saturation - Electric..... ........22
Low lncome - Electric .........24
Low lncome - Natural Gas............. ........26
Non Residential - Prescriptive Clothes Washers Electric and Natural Gas............. .............28
Non Residential - ENERGYSMART Grocer - EIectric..... ................ 30
Non Residentia!- ENERGYSMART Grocer - Natural Gas.............. ....................33
Non Residential- Food Service Equipment - Electric ...................35
Non Residential- Food Service Equipment - NaturalGas............. ..................39
Non Residential - Green Motors Rewind - Electric..... ..................42
Non Residential HVAC Variable Frequency Drives - Electric...... .......,...............43
Non Residential - Standby Generator Block Heater - Electric... .......................45
Non Residential - Power Management for PC Networks - Electric...... ............46
Non Residentia! - Demand{ontrolled Ventilation - Electric .......48
Non Residential - Demand-Controlled Ventilation - Natural Gas............. ......50
Non Residential- Prescriptive Windows and lnsulation - Electric...... .............52
Non Residential- Prescriptive Windows and lnsulation - NaturalGas.............. .................54
Non Residential- Premium Efficiency Motors - Electric ..............55
Non Residential - Prescriptive Side-Stream Filtration - Electric .......................58
Non Residential - Prescriptive Lighting - EIectric... .......................60
Non Residential - tED Traffic Signals - Electric .........64
llPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1,Page2of 76
Non Residential - Prescriptive HVAC - Natural Gas ............. ........ 66
Non Residential - Prescriptive Steam Trap Replacements - Natural Gas.............. .............. 68
Non Residential - Site-Specific - Electric ...................70
Non Residential - Site-Specific - Natural Gas............. .................. 73
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 3 of 76
2lPage
RESIDENTIAL HOME IMPROVEMENT - ELECTRIC
Electric Home lmprovement 2012 20tt 2010
Participants (rebates)931 1,054 2.29r
Energy Savings (kwh)1,068,185 L,646,287 3.807.586
Energv Savings (Therms) - interactive I14.9621 (16,886)(30.124)
Non-energv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio o.7L L.24 2.88
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 1.19 3.30 5.26
Participant B/C ratio 1.48 2.20 5.20
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.60 0.55 L.46
Net-to-sross factor - HE Eouipment 45.5o/o'45.5%'6L.O%
Net-to-eross factor - Weatherization 68.3%',68.3%"63.9%o
Discount Rate 7.OL%',6.80%6.80%
Non-lncentive Exoenses"Ss21,98s s6s.636 s328.338
lncentive Exoenses 5219,378 52s2,Ltg s627,3s7
Program Description
Rebates are available for energy efficiency improvements on existing residential homes that heat
primarily with Avista electricity. A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of purchase and other
appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from the installation of the
equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The following are the measures that were eligible for electric
rebates in2OLZ in this category. Any differences from the 2012 program offering will be addressed by
year later in this document
l Since the Net-to-Gross (NTG) on 2012 participation were not yet available, NTG from the most recent study was
used.
2 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
3 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
a Since the Net-to-Gross (NTG) on 2012 participation were not yet available, NTG from the most recent study was
used.
4 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared
5 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
6 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
7 Historically, Avista used the discount rate used for the lntegrated Resource Plan. Discount rate changed from the
last lRP.
8 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on avoided
costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level. This
includes labor.
3lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 4 of76
Electric to Natural Gas Conversion - Space Heat:
r Replacement of straight resistance electric heat with a central heat pump or replacement of
straight resistance electric heat with a central naturalgas heating system; Rebate 5750o Replacement of an electric tanked water heater with a natural gas tanked water heater; Rebate
Szoo
High Efficiency HVACo lnstallation of ducted air source heat pump with HSPF of 8.5 (manufactured homes must have
HSPF of 7.7 and 13 SEER); Rebate 5400. lnstallation of ductless heat pump with HSPF of 9.0; Rebate 5200o lnstallation of variable speed motor incorporated into a primary heating system; Rebate 5100
High Efficiency Water Heaters. lnstallation of high efficient tank water heater with an efficiency rating (EF) of 0.93 or greater;
Rebate S50
Weatherization I mprovements
Contactor installed either fitted/batt or blown-in insulation material
o Attic: R-10 or greater where less than R-19 exists; Rebate SO.ZS per square foot
o Wall/Floor: R-10 or greater where less than R-5 exists; Rebate SO.SO per square foot
Fireplace Damper
o lnstallation of fireplace dampers to reduce the amount of heat loss through a chimney with
existing wood burning fireplaces; only available for retrofit situations. Not allowable if there are
combustion appliances using the chimney as an exhaust; Rebate 5200 - Discontinued March 1
20L2
Program Activity
The Fireplace Damper rebate was discontinued in March of 20t2. This was the only change to this group
of rebates. Other activities in 2012 included multiple meetings to provide information to vendors from a
variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation, builders) about the Avista programs and protocols. An on-line
rebate application process also went live in 2012 to provide an electronic means for customers to
submit their projects for consideration.
Program Changes
The Electric Home lmprovement Program is on-going and changes are made as needed. The 2012
rebates mentioned in Program Description were available in 2011 and 2010. Listed below are the
notable differences in the measures offered and the rebates available in those prior program years.
20L\
Electric to Natural Gas Conversions
o Water heater conversion rebate reduced from 5250 to 5200 (April)
Weatherizationo High Efficiency Windows - Discontinued - lnstallation of u-value windows of .30 or lower;
Rebate S3.OO per sq ft (April)
4lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 5 of 76
. lnsulation projects; must be contractor installed; no longer allow "do-it-yourself' to be eligible
for rebate consideration (April)
Shade tree
o Spokane County Conservation District (SCCD) for planting qualifying shade trees - Rebate S18
per tree. SCCD worked with customers to identify potential sites and the appropriate tree in the
right location for energy savings. The siting is 15-30 feet to the south of the home and avoiding
overhead electrical and other utility lines. Discontinued for March 2012.
2010
HVAC Conversiono Rebate for electric to natural gas forced air furnace was reduced from 51,000 to 5750 (March)
High Efficiency HVACo Ground source heat pump of 13.6 HSPF (heating efficiency) or higher - Discontinued - Rebate
S1,5oo (March)
o High efficient central air conditioning of 14.0 SEER or higher - Discontinued - Rebate SSSO -
should replace old but functioning central air conditioning system Central air conditioning in this
case is defined as a ducted air conditioning system of 1.5 tons (18,000 BTUs) cooling or higher,
conditioning at least 75o/o of the home (March)
Water Heatero Tankless water heater with 0.82 EF or higher - Discontinued - Rebate 5200 - Discontinued during
2010; not cost effective (March)
Home Electric List of Measureslm
Measure Descriotion
UES (annual
kwhle
Non-Enerry
Benefits
Measure
Lifelo
E Air Source Heat Pumo 336.52 n/a 15
E Attic lnsulation w Electric Heat 0.5Usq ft n/a 18
E Ductless Heat Pump 184.63 nla 15
E Electric to Air Source Heat Pump 5,589.31 nla 15
E Electric to Natural Gas Furnace L2,0L2.42 nla 20
E Electric to Natural Gas Water Heater 4,O3L.L7 nla 20
E Elecric Water Heater 119.10 n/a 13
E Floor lnsulation w Electric Heat 1.83/sq ft nla 18
E Variable Speed Motor 438.55 nla 15
E Wall lnsulation w Electric Heat 1.83/so ft nla 18
E Fireplace Damper w Electric Heat (discontinued)163 nla 18
e Unit Estimated Savings (UES) are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after
their evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency programs.
to Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency programs.
5lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 6 of76
RESIDENTIAL HOME IMPROVEMENT - NATURAL GAS
Natural Gas Home lmprovement 20L2 20Lt 2010
Particioants ( rebates)L,267 L,994 2,7L0
Enersv Savinss (kwh) - interactive (t69,2281 613,L72 379,420
Enersv Savines (Therms)LL8,607 133,399 239,321
Non-enersv Benefits n/a nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.s0 t.o4 2.36
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 0.78 2.66 2.80
Participant B/C ratio 2.38 L.34 4.70
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio o.4L 0.81 t.78
Net-to-gross factor - HE Equipment 45.5"45.5o/o"67.0%
Net-to-gross factor - Weatherization 69.3'"683%"63.80/o
Discount Rate 5.37o/o 4.L7%4.L70/o
Non-lncentive Expenses"s240,969 s351,306 5297,988
lncentive Expenses s458,333 s697,016 S887,783
Program Description
Rebates are available for energy efficiency improvements on existing residential homes that heat
primarily with Avista natural gas. Rebates are provided to customers after proof of purchase and other
appropriate documentation has been submitted. Customers have 90 days from the installation of the
equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The following are the measures that were eligible for natural
gas rebates in 20L2 in this category. Any differences from the 2OL2 program offering will be addressed
by year later in this document
High Efficiency HVACr Natural gas furnace or boiler with 90% AFUE or better; Rebate 5400 - Discontinued November
2072
High Efficiency Water Heaterso lnstallation of natural gas tank water heater with an efficiency rating (EF) of 0.62 for 40 gallon or
0.60 for 50 gallon; Rebate S30 - Oiscontinued November 2012
" Since NTG results on 2OL2 programs were not yet available, Avista used NTG factors from the most recent study.12 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,20L2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
13 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
'o Since NTG results on 20L2 programs were not yet available, Avista used NTG factors from the most recent study.
1s Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
16 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.t' lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
SlPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 7 of76
Weatherization I m provements
Contactor installed either fitted/batt or blown-in insulation material
r Attic: R-10 or greater where less than R-19 exists; Rebate 50.25 per square foot
r Wall/Floor: R-10 or greater where less than R-5 exists; Rebate SO.SO per square foot
Discontinued for natural gas heated homes November 2012
Fireplace Damper
o lnstallation of fireplace dampers to reduce the amount of heat loss through a chimney with
existing wood burning fireplaces; only available for retrofit situations. Not allowable if there are
combustion appliances using the chimney as an exhausU Rebate SZOO - Discontinued March
20t2
Program Activity
All rebates related to natural gas heated homes were discontinued in November. The Company's
integrated resource plan for natural gas was evaluated in 2OL2 and identified a significant drop in
avoided costs. As a result, naturalgas rebate programs would not pass the cost effectiveness criteria.
The Company filed a request to the Commission to "discontinue" natural gas rebate programs
temporarily. ln the event natural gas avoided costs start to rise, these programs will be re-evaluated for
cost effectiveness. This filing was approved and natural gas rebates were no longer available as of
November 1.
Other 2012 activities included meetings to help educate vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC,
insulation, builders) about Avista programs and protocols. An on-line rebate application process went
live in 2012 to provide an electronic means for customers to submit their project for consideration.
Program Changes
The Natural Gas Home lmprovement Program was on-going and changes are made on as needed. The
2012 rebates mentioned in Program Description were available in 2011 and 2010. Listed below are the
notable differences in the measures offered and the rebates available in those prior program years.
201L
Weatherization I mprovementse High Efficiency Windows - Discontinued - lnstallation of u-value windows of .30 or lower;
Rebate 53.00 per sq ft (July)
o lnsulation projects; must be contractor installed; no longer allow "do-it-yourself' to be eligible
for rebate consideration (July)
2070
High efficiency water heaterso Tankless water heater rebate available for 5200 with 0.82 EF or greater - discontinued March
2010 due to cost-effectiveness concerns
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 8 of 76
TlPage
Home
Measure Descriotion
UES (annual
thermsl18
Non-Energy
Benefits
Measure
Lifele
G 40 Gallon Natural Gas Water Heater 8.80 nla 13
G 50 Gallon Natural Gas Water Heater 9.04 nla 13
G Attic lnsulation w Natural Gas Heat 65.55/home nla 18
G Floor lnsulation w Natural Gas Heat 65.55/home nla 18
G NaturalGas Boiler 93 nla 20
G Natural Gas Furnace"103 nla 20
G Wall lnsulation w NaturalGas Heat 66.56/home nla 18
G Fireplace Damperw NaturalGas Heat (discontinued)5.56 nla 18
G Replc Windows (discontinued)22.46lhome nla 20
Natural Gas List of Measures
" UES are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their evaluation of Avista's
2011 energy efficiency programs.
" Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficienry programs.
'o This measure has negative interactive kWh of 165.10 per home due to the percentage of homes found to be
getting air conditioning/heat pumps at the same time. This was discovered during the 2011 evaluation.
8tPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page I of76
RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION - ELECTRIC
Please refer to Residential Home lmprovement - Electric for historical statistics on this program. The
new construction category has not been tracked separately within Avista's database nor reported
separated.
Program Description
Rebates are available for energy efficiency improvements on new construction residential homes that
heat primarily with Avista electric. A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of purchase and
other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from installation of the
equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The following are the measures that were eligible for electric
rebates in2Ot2 in this category. Any differences from the 2012 program offering will be addressed by
year later in this document
High Efficiency HVAC
o lnstallation of ducted air source heat pump with HSPF of 8.5 (manufactured homes must have
HSPF of 7.7 and 13 SEER); Rebate 5400o lnstallation of ductless heat pump with HSPF of 9.0; Rebate 5200o lnstallation of variable speed motor incorporated into a primary heating system; Rebate S100
High Efficiency Water Heaters
. lnstallation of high efficient tank water heater with an efficiency rating (EF) of 0.93 or greater;
Rebate S50
Program Activity
Activities in 2OL2 included multiple meetings to provide information to vendors from a variety of sectors
(HVAC, insulation, builders) about the Avista programs and protocols. An on-line rebate application
process went live in2Ot2 to provide an electronic means for customers to submit their projects for
consideration. There was not any notable change to rebates within the Electric New Construction offers.
Program Changes
The New Construction Program is on-going and changes are made on as needed. The 2012 rebates
mentioned in the Program Description were available in 2011 and 2010. Listed below are the notable
differences in the measures offered and the rebates available in those prior program years.
20!L
No changes to note
20LO
Ground source heat pump rebate available for St,500 for installation of a high efficiency ground source
heat pump of 13.5 HSPF (heating efficiency) or higher. A comparable Coefficient of Perfomance rating
would be a 3.5 COP or higher. This may not be combined with any other high efficiency incentives.
(discontinued Morch 2070 due to cost effectiveness)
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 10 of76
9lPage
RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION - NATURAL GAS
Please refer to Residential Home lmprovement - Natural Gas for historical statistics on this program.
The new construction category has not been tracked separately within Avista's database nor reported
separated.
Program Description
Rebates are available for energy efficiency improvements on new construction residential homes that
heat primarily with Avista natural gas. A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of purchase and
other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from installation of the
equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The following are the measures that were eligible for natural
gas rebates in 2OL2 in this category. Any differences from the 2072 program offering will be addressed
by year later in this document
High Efficienry HVACo Natural gas furnace or boiler with 90% AFUE or better; Rebate 5400 - Discontinued November
20L2
High Efficiency Water Heaterso lnstallation of natural gas tank water heater with an efficiency rating (EF) of 0.62 for 40 gallon or
0.60 for 50 gallon; Rebate S30 - Oiscontinued November 2012
Program Activity
All rebates related to naturalgas heated homes were discontinued in November. The Company's
integrated resource plan for natural gas was evaluated in 2Ot2 and identified a significant drop in
avoided costs. As a result, natural gas rebate programs would not pass the cost effectiveness criteria.
The Company filed a request to the Commission to "discontinue" natural gas rebate programs
temporarily. ln the event natural gas avoided costs start to rise, these programs will be re-evaluated for
cost effectiveness. This filing was approved and natural gas rebates were no longer available as of
November 1.
Other 2012 activities included meetings to help educate vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC,
insulation, builders) about Avista programs and protocol. An on-line rebate application process went
live in 2012 to provide an electronic means for customers to submit their projects for consideration.
Program Changes
The New Construction Program is on-going and changes are made on as needed. The 2012 rebates
mentioned in the Program Description were available in 2011 and 2010. Listed below are the notable
differences in the measures offered and the rebates available in those prior program years.
20LL
No changes to note
2010
High Efficiency Water Heaters - Tankless water heater with 0.82 EF or greater; rebate available for 5200
- Discontinued March 2010 due to cost-effectiveness
10!Page
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 11 ol76
Electric Energry Staro Homes 2012 2011,2010
Particioants (rebates)L7 13 32
Enersy Savinss (kwh)24,698 46,568 7\,507
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive 406 768 3,749
Non-energv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.66 1.51 0.70
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio L.26 4.66 2.27
Participant B/C ratio t.23 2.33 12.LL
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.59 0.76 0.92
Net-to-gross factor 73.60/0 73.6%73.6yo"
Discount Rate 7.OL%6.80%6.80%
Non-lncentive Exoenses"s15,840 53,223 StJoq
lncentive Exoenses s9,9oo S11,400 s28,250
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STAR@ HOMES. ELECTRIC
Program Description
The Energy Star@ Home program is available to builders of new construction homes that have Avista
electricity for space and water heating needs that meet the criteria and are certified as an Energy Star@
Home.
This 5900 rebate may not be combined with any other incentive offered under the Residential New
Construction Program or the Energy Star@ Appliance Program.
Program Activity
This is the local version of NEEA's Northwest Energy Staro Homes initiative. Much of the information
around this offering is funneled through that information channel. Vendor meetings held in 2012
referenced the program's availability and requirements.
Program Changes
The Energy Staro Homes Program is on-going and is reviewed on as needed. The 2012 rebates
mentioned in Program Description were available in 2011 and 2010. There are no other notable
changes to report.
21 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
22 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
This includes labor.
11 lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 12ot76
Homes-
Measure Description uEs (kwh)23
Non-Energy
Benefits
Measure
Lifea
Enersv Staro Home - All Electric 2,5L0 nla 25
Energy Staro Home - Electric & Natural Gas 1,054 nla 25
Starc Homes - Electric List of Measures
" UES are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their evaluation of Avista's
2011 energy efficiency programs.
'o Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency programs.
12 lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 13 of76
RESIDENTIAT ENERGY STAR@HOMES - NATURAL GAS
Natural Gas Enerw Staro Homes 2012 20tt 20to
Particioants (rebates)7 13 15
Enersv Savinss (kwh) - interactive nla nla nla
Enercv Savines (Therms)1,423 1,665 2,453
Non-enersv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.72 1.30 7.04
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio t.27 2.33 2.07
Participant B/C ratio 2.37 1.88 I7.56
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.45 0.94 0.11
Net-to-sross factor 73.6%73.60/o 73.60/,"
Discount Rate 5.37o/o 4.t7%4.L7%
Non-l ncentive Expenses'o S3,332 ss,638 s3,038
lncentive Exoenses Sq,sso sg,45o S9,zso
Program Description
The Energy Star@ Home program is available to builders of new construction homes that have Avista
natural gas for space and water heating needs that meet the criteria and are certified as an Energy Staro
Homes.
This 5650 rebate may not be combined with any other incentive offered under the Residential New
Construction Program or the Energy Star@ Appliance Program.
Program Activity
This is the local version of NEEA's Northwest Energy Staro Homes initiative. Much of the information
around this offering is funneled through that information channel. Vendor meetings were held in 2Ot2
referencing the availability and requirements of the program.
Program Changes
The Energy Staro Homes Program is on-going and is reviewed on as needed. The 2012 rebates
mentioned in Program Description were available in 2011 and 2010. There are no other notable
changes to report.
StaroHomes - Natural Gas List of Measures
Measure Descriotion
UES (annual
therms)27
Non-Energy
Benefits
Measure
Life28
E Energv Staro Home - Natural Gas Onlv 203.3 nla 25
2s Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
26 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
This includes labor.
" UES are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their evaluation of Avista's
2011 energy efficiency programs.
" Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency programs.
13tPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page'14 ot 76
RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING - ETECTRIC
Program Description
This program is intended to prompt the customer to increase the energy-efficiency of their lighting
equipment through financial incentives at the manufacturing level or through distribution of product. lt
indirectly supports the infrastructure and inventory necessary to ensure that customers install high-
efficiency lamps.
Simple Steps, Smart Sovings -Retoil Buy-down Program:
This program provides Avista and its customers with a simple delivery mechanism for customers to
purchase CFLs and showerheads that have the incentive incorporated into the manufacturer markdown
2e lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
'o Since net-to-Gross results on 20L2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.3'lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
rclelte
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 15of76
Simple Steps Smart Savings 2012 20tt 2010
Participants (simple steps bulbs)L37,024 L57,7tO 69,555
Enerey Savines (kwh)2,997,434 4,620,825 L,736,608
Enersv Savinss (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-energv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio L7.04 1.95 4.36
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 77.04 1.95 4.36
Particioant B/C ratio nla n/a nla
Rate lmoact Measure B/C ratio 6.4r 0.53 0.84
Net-to-eross factor nla nla nla
Discount Rate 7.Ot%6.80%6.80%
Non-l ncentive Exoenses"s43,996 s268,686 S102,933
lncentive Exoenses s109,383 Sszs,889 5L7t,Lzq
CFI Mail Distribution 2012 20tL 2010
Participants (cfl mail distribution bulbs)nla 758,935 nla
Enersv Savinss (kwh)nla L3,290,L18 n/a
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-enersv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla 3.46 nla
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio n/a 3.46 nla
Participant B/C ratio nla n/a nla
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio nla 0.60 nla
Net-to-sross factor nla 65.9'u nla
Discount Rate nla 6.80%nla
Non-l ncentive Expenses"'n/a s301,571 n/a
lncentive Expenses nla $989,922 nla
promotions. This program is intended to prompt the customer to increase the energy-efficiency of their
lighting and hot water use through financial incentives provided upstream to manufacturers in order to
offer participating regional retailers efficient product at decreased prices. These reduced prices are
passed onto customers. lt also indirectly supports the infrastructure and inventory necessary to ensure
that the installation of high-efficiency lighting a viable option for the customer through local retailers.
Measure lncentive
General Purpose CFL so.so
Specialtv CFL s2.00
LED Lamp s3.oo
LED Fixture S8.oo
Measures Measures kontinued)
Twists:12.20.26 watt $Way
9W Soira| CFL 33W 3-Wav
13W Soiral CFL 12.23.29 watt $Wav
14W Spiral CFL 12. 23. 34 watt 3-Wav
15W Spiral CFL 1 lW R20 Reflector
18W Soiral CFL 14W Reflector
20W SDiral CFL 15W R30 Reflector
23W Soiral CFL z3w R3E Reflector
30W Soiral CFL 26W R38 Refleclor
4OW SDiraI CFL 26W R40 Reflector
13W Davlioht 23W Outdoor Reflector
23W Davliqht 26W Outdoor Reflector
9WA-lamo 23W R38 Hioh Heat Refleclor
15 WAlamD 7W Candelabra
14WA19 9W Candelabra
Snacialtu CFI s'13W Candelabra
14W Candle Base BW 12W Globe
16W R30 Flood 15W Globe
23W R40 Flood
CFL Recycling Progrom:
CFL Recycling program has no energy efficiency measures. CFL recycling locations are being provided to
customers as a convenience, throughout Avista's service territory, while Avista is promoting the use of
CFLs.
Program Activity
Portfolio acquisition and cost-effectiveness projections are closely related. The screening of
measures and programs to exclude those that are not anticipated to be cost-effective on a net TRC
basis (absent reasonable exceptions) clearly have an influence upon acquisition. Shifting cost-
effectiveness is most frequently the result of changing technologies, the cost of those technologies,
avoided costs, measure life and energy savings.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 16 of76
TRC cost-effectiveness rtlsults measure from the most recent business
Proqrom
Overoll portfolio gross sub-
TRC w/o NIUC
Overoll portfolio gross sub-
TRCw NIUC
Overoll portfolio net sub-TRC
w NIUC
Res-Lighting 2.06 1.75 1.50
Event CFL Distribution L1.70 11,.70
15 lPage
Program Changes
20Lt
lmplemented a Direct MailCFL Distribution effort (July)
20L2
Added (January) and later removed (February 2013) showerheads as part of the Simple Steps, Smart
Savings Program and discontinued Dollars for Change-School CFL Fundraising Program2013 due to cost-
effectiveness (see table below for the statistics on the showerhead distribution through Simple Steps)
32 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
15 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 17 of76
Simple Steos Smart Savings 2012 2011 2010
Participants (simple steps showerheads)L,250 n/a nla
Energy Savings (kwh)301,130 n/a nla
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-energv Benefits n/a nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 7.30 nla nla
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 7.30 nla nla
Participant B/C ratio nla nla nla
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.88 nla nla
Net-to-gross factor nla n/a nla
Discount Rate 7.O7%nla n/a
Non-l ncentive Exoenses Sz,ore nla n/a
lncentive Exoenses s77,447 nla nla
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STARo APPLIANCES - ELECTRIC and NATURAL GAS
Discontinued m
Electric ES Appliances 2012 20tL 2010
Participants (rebates)L,79L 2,870 3,801
Energy Savings (kwh)380,897 342,497 438,818
Energv Savings (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-energv Benefits 36,356 n/a nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.69 0.49 0.54
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 1.36 2.O4 2.46
Participant B/C ratio 1.2t 0.76 L.32
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.59 0.50 0,42
Net-to-gross factor 41.9o/o 4L.g%o""52.0o/o""
Discount Rate 7.OL%6.80o/o 6.80%
Non-l ncentive Expenses"S135,704 s13,520 522,L88
lncentive Exoenses S50,77o s95,910 s123,390
Natural Gas ES Appliances 20L2 20tl,2010
Participants ( rebates)532 L,2OO 1,608
Enersv Savinss (kwh)L25,LOg L9,174 25,972
Enersv Savinss (Therms) - interactive 3,256 7,794 9,983
Non-enersv Benefits 363 nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.82 0.3s 0.27
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 4.02 t.22 1.04
Participant B/C ratio 1.13 0.s1 L0.77
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.28 0.52 0.03
Net-to-sross factor 47.9%4L.g%o""52.0o/o"'
Discount Rate 5.37%4.t70/o 417%
Non-lncentive ExDenses'o s3,804 s10,710 So,gag
lncentive Expenses $L7,47s s48,27s s5s,12s
Program Description
Currently, Energy Staro rated freezers, refrigerators, dishwashers and clothes washer rebates have been
discontinued, as of March 1,20L3. This program was designed for ease of use by Avista electric and
natural gas residential customers in ldaho and Washington. Rebates were applicable to new or existing
33Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.s Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.tt lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
" rbid.
37 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
38 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
lTlPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 18 of76
Measures within the 2072-March 7,2073
Measure lncentive
Refrigerators s2s.00
Freezer s20.00
Clothes Washers ss0.00
single and multi-family residences, including manufactured, modular homes and domestically used in
businesses. Appliances for both new construction and retrofit purchases were eligible. Key external
stakeholders included homeowners, landlords (and renters) and businesses. Key internal stakeholders
included contact center, accounts payable, marketing and corporate communications.
Program Activity
Avista has historically evaluated the DSM portfolio based upon varying levels of net-to-gross
scenarios. With the compilation of the 2011 Cadmus net-to-gross study it was possible to substitute
those estimates into the net cost-effectiveness calculations. This study revealed low NTG which led
to the discontinuation of this measure.
-effectiveness results
Program Changes
Due to the low sub TRC results for the clothes washers and other Energy Staro Appliances it was decided
to discontinue the Energy Staro Appliance Rebate Program and the program ended March 1, 2013. The
customers and retailers received 90 days advance notice of the discontinuation of the Energy Star@
Appliance Rebate Program. Customers had 90 days to submit the form under old requirements. Direct
mail communication was sent to retailers as well as, internal forms and website updates addressed the
discontinuation of the Energy Star@ Appliance Program.
20L2
Clothes washers incentive was reduced from SS0 to S25 (January) and dishwashers were discontinued
(January).
3' Discontinue d in 2OL2 for freerider concerns - recent Net-to-Gross study found that this market had been
transformed.
lSlPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 19of76
Medsures within the zo70-2077
Measure lncentive
Refrigerators s2s.00
Freezer s20.00
Dishwaher s2s.00
Clothes Washers ss0.00
TRC cost measure in the 2013 business plan estimated the followi
Meosure pockoge Overoll portfolio gross sub-
TRC w/o NIUC
Overoll portfolio gross sub-
TRCw NIUC
Overoll portfolio net sub-TRC
w NIUC
Clothes Washer o.79 o,72 0.52
RefrigeratorlFreezer 1.10 1.06 1.03
Appliance
Dishwasher3e
Electric
* UES are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their evaluation of Avista's
2011 energy efficiency programs.
o' Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency programs.o' UES are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus
2011 energy efficiency programs.
o' Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency programs.
lglPage
by Cadmus after their
after their evaluation of Avista's
by Cadmus after their
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 20 ol 76
star0 List ot Measures
Measure Description
UES (annual
kwh)40
Non-Energy
Benefits
Measure
Lifeal
E Clothes Washer w Electric Water Heater 490.14 nla 10
E Freezer 46.52 nla 20
E Refrigerator 6s.52 nla 20
E Dishwasher w Electric Water Heater 62 nla 9
Staro - Natural Gas List of Measures
Measure Descriotion
UES (annual
thermsla2
Non-Energy
Benefits
Measure
Lifea3
G Clothes Washer w Natural Gas Water Heater 318 n/a 10
G Dishwasher w Natural Gas Water Heater L.29 nla 9
RESIDENTIAT APPLIANCE RECYCLING - ETECTRIC
Electric Appliance RecYcling 2012 20tL 2010
Participants (rebates)426 554 392
Energy Savings (kwh)442,944 575,209 457.357
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive nla n/a nla
Non-energv Benefits nla n/a nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 4.31 2.90 3.45
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 3.46 2.L3 3.00
Participant B/C ratio nla -2.98 -20.99
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio o.76 1.19 0.80
Net-to-gross factor 4L.O%4L.O%nla
Discount Rate 7.OL%6.800/0 6.80%
Non-l ncentive Expenses"'Ssz,sss 5+s,gtt s78,30s
lncentive Exoenses iLz,l80 S16,612 Srr,zso
Program Description
This program is applicable to residential electric or electric/natural gas combo customers seeking to
recycle energy inefficient refrigerators or freezers, in Washington and ldaho. Key external stakeholders
include JACO Environmental lnc (JACO), homeowners, renters and landlords. This program is intended
to prompt the customer to decrease their energy used on inefficient second refrigerators or freezers by
recycling and receiving financial incentives. JACO picks up a maximum of two Refrigerators and/or
Freezers (units) from a custome/s home when they request a pick-up. The pick-up service is free to the
customer. A S30 rebate is provided for each operational refrigerator and/or freezer, up to two per
household. The pre-1995 refrigerator(s) or freezer(s) are picked up and delivered to a recycling facility
operated by JACO. JACO recycles nearly 95 percent of each refrigerator, and safely disposes the toxins
and ozone-destroying chlorofluorocarbon gases from foam insulation. JACO works with local businesses
to recycle glass, plastic and metal.
Program Criteria:
o The refrigerator or freezer needs to be in working condition and between 10 to 30 cubic feet in
size. Units also must be 1995 models or older.
o The program is for Avista Electric or Electric/Gas customers only.o Customers must own the unit(s) being recycled, with a limit of two units per account.
o The S30 rebate check will be mailed to the customer within 4 to 5 weeks after the appliance
collection.
s Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 20L2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
as lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
20 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 21 ol 76
Messures within the 2010-2013
Measure lncentive
Refrigerators s30.oo
Freezer s30.00
Program Activity
Portfolio acquisition and cost-effectiveness projections are closely related. The screening of
measures and programs to exclude those that are not anticipated to be cost-effective on a net TRC
basis (absent reasonable exceptions) clearly have an influence upon acquisition. Cost-effectiveness
variability results from technology changes, the cost and customer acceptance of those
technologies, avoided costs, measure lives and changes in energy savings estimates.
Program Changes
There have been no significant changes to this program from 2010 to date.
- Electric List of Measures
Measure Descriotion
UES (annual
kwhl45
Non-Energy
Benefits
Measure
Life{7
E Recvcled Freezer 880.59 nla 6
E Recvcled Refriserator 1.082.99 nla 9
ot UES are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their evaluation of Avista's
2011 energy efficiency programs.o'Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency programs.
21 lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 22 ol 76
RESIDENTIAL GEOGRAPHIC SATURATION - ELECTRIC
20!2 20tt 2010
Participants (rebates)673 2,960 5,445
Energy Savings (kwh)10,09s 58,016 L29,972
Enersv Savinss (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-energv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio t.47 2.90 5.95
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio t.47 2.L3 5.95
Participant B/C ratio nla nla nla
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.s6 1.19 0.97
Net-to-gross factor nla nla nla
Discount Rate 7.070/0 6.80%6.8004
Non-l ncentive Expenses S1,334 s822,984 9,279
lncentive Exoenses s1,334 54,29L 5,445
Program Description
This program was intended to prompt and encourage Avista customers to increase the energy efficiency
of their residences. As part of this strategy, the "Something for Everyone" or "Geographic Saturation"
events promote energy efficiency measures and programs offered by Avista as well as other low cost
measures that customers can implement in their homes.
Examples of events include:
o The program educates and gives an effective way to communicate energy efficiency and
modifies behavior through awareness and product knowledge.o Avista participates in workshops, conferences, energy fairs and community events throughout
Avista's service territory in Washington and ldaho, to spread the energy efficiency message.r Distributes energy efficiency materials, such as, CFLs and weatherization products to introduce
the use of such products to our customers.o lnforms residential customers about the energy efficiency options and rebates available to them
through Avista rebates.
a8 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
22lP ase
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 23 ol 76
Meosures within the Prcgrom: 2O7O-2073
Measure-Weatherization Prod uct Distribution lncentive(Product Cost)
CFL s2.00
Rope Caulk s1.00
Window Seal s5.oo
Showerheads s3.00
Draft Stopoers s1.oo
V-Seal s2.00
Program Activity
Residential programs have benefitted from the sustained customer outreach campaign, Geographic
Saturation, which educates the customer on the availability of Avista's energy efficiency programs.
This program encourages customers to take action through participation in currently offered
programs. lt has also provided customers with energy efficiency information.
Program Changes
The 2010 business plan included a planned reduction in the number of scheduled events. Consequently,
Avista scaled down its Geographic Saturation Program by participating in 41 community events
throughout its service territory. ln the few years priol Avista participated in twice as many events.
During those years we had reached and educated a significant number of customers. Avista concluded
that we had succeeded in our goal to provide significant outreach to both rural and urban Avista
customer communities and it was time to scale down the outreach efforts.
ln 2011, Avista coordinated the community outreach program and developed a new approach, known as
"outreach in a box". The "outreach in a borC' can be used by the DSM or other Avista departments to
promote current rebates and educate customers about energy efficiency. During 2011, DSM staff
participated in selected community energy fairs and public engagements.
ln 2072, Avista continued its approach to limit DSM-led outreach to select community events and
focused on energy fairs and vendor outreach. Avista also continued to maintain DSM tools for other
departments to leverage for use at their public engagements. This approach also known as "outreach in
a box" was well received as DSM-led events reduced from over 50 to less than a dozen while making
DSM messaging and support available to other Avista departments wanting to include energy efficiency
awareness in their efforts.
Electric ofSaturation - Electric List of Measures
Measure Description
UES (annual
kwhl4e
Non-Energy
Benefits
Measure
Lifeso
CFL Bulb 23.74 nla 7
o' UES are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their evaluation of Avista's
2011 energy efficiency programs.
to Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency programs.
23!Page
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 24 ol 76
tOW INCOME - ELECTRIC
Electric Low lncome 2012 20Lt 2010
Particioants (rebates)2L4 378 191
Enersv Savinss (kwh)274,949 236.767 78,835
Enersv Savinss (Therms) - interactive (7,78L1 n/a nla
Non-enersv Benefits S167,83G s40.587 5ta,su
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio t.o7 0.43 0.83
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 0.67 0.38 0.46
Participant B/C ratio nla 6.74 nla
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.48 0.25 0.35
Net-to-sross factor"1.00 1.00 1.00
Discount Rate 7.OL%6.800/o 6.80o/o
Non-l ncentive Expenses"529,284 s31,937 s63,563
lncentive Expenses s385,955 5383,244 s194,983
Program Description
Avista contracts with one community action agency to serve our ldaho service territory low income
customers from Grangeville to Sandpoint and Post Falls to Wallace. This same agency also serves a
small county in Washington state. The agency has the infrastructure in place to income qualify potential
participants as well as provide the audit and installation of the identified measures.
A list of Avista approved measures with a high predictability of adequate cost-effectiveness is provided
to the agency each year. Other measures may be submitted for approval if cost-effectiveness is in
question. Health and human safety measures that are necessary to ensure the habitability of the home
in order for residents to benefit from energy saving investments are allowed under these programs.
The agency completes installation of efficiency measures at no cost to qualified customers.
Administrative fees are paid to the agency for delivery of these programs.
Below is the "Approved" Measure list for installation by the agency in Avista electrically heated homes:e insulation for ceiling, wall, floor and duct
o air infiltrationo electric to natural gas conversions for space and water heat
o high efficient electric water heaters. Energy Star@ doors. Energy Staro windows
Below is the " Pre-Approval" Measure list (must receive Avista authorization before installation):o electric resistance heat to air source heat pump conversiono high efficient air source heat pump installation. Energy Star Energy Staro refrigerators
sr The net-to-gross factor is assumed to be 1 for low income.
s2 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
24 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 25 ot 76
Program Activity
lnitial results of impact and process evaluations were becoming available in 2012. The amount of
energy savings for measures being claimed in the low income residence was often in excess of what was
being used by the entire home. Adjustments were made mid-way through 2OL2to modify the unit
energy savings (UES) amounts for measures in the event the actual residence was utilizing far less
energy than the savings that were being claimed. This was an attempt to provide more accurate
estimates of energy savings and improve realization rates for the evaluation on 2012 participation.
Program Changes
The Low lncome Program is on-going and is reviewed on as needed. The 2012 measures mentioned in
the Program Description were available in 2011 and 2010. The notable change began in 2010 to try to
manage towards a better Total Resource Cost test. The development of the "Low lncome Total
Resource Cost Calculato/' (LITRCC) occurred in late 2009/early 2010 and has been revised and improved
over time to have a better working knowledge of where the program may be in the realm of cost-
effectiveness at any given time during the program. This process is still in place at this time.
Low lncome - Electric List of Measures
Measure Description
UES (annual
kwhl53 Non-Energy Benefitss
Measure
Lifess
E Air lnfiltration 0.3Usq ft nla 20
E Enersv Staro Doors 248.21 Rebate Amt - S50 45
E Enersv Staro Windows 0.33/sq ft Rebate Amt -(Sq Ft {' 53.99)45
E HE Water Heater 105 Ssoo 13
E Insulation - Ceilins/Attic 0.5Usq ft nla 45
E lnsulation - Duct 0.53/sq ft n/a 18
E lnsulation - Floor 1.83/so ft nla 45
E lnsulation - Wall 1.83/so ft nla 45
E Electric to Natural Gas Furnace
Conversion
8,213.81 S1,5oo 25
E Electric to Natural Gas Water
Conversion
3,042.63 Ssoo 13
t' UES are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their evaluation of Avista's
2011 energy efficiency programs.
sa Other than Health & Human Safety, which is considered a dollar for dollar NEB, low income NEBs for each
measurewere calculated and provided byprogram implementation based on incremental costdifference between
h igh-effi ciency a nd sta n d effi ciency options.tt Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency programs.
25 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 26 of 76
LOW INCOME - NATURAT GAS
Natural Gas Low lncome 2012 20tt 2010
Particioants ( rebates)257 28L 22s
Energy Savings (kwh) - interactive -485 nla nla
Energy Savings (Therms)9,353 12,835 8.885
Non-enersv Benefits 5722,99L Soq,qoq nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.s3 0.53 0.47
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 0.19 0.54 o.42
Particioant B/C ratio n/a 2.82 nla
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.15 o.37 0.31
Net-to-sross factodo 1.00 1.00 1.00
Discount Rate 5.37%4.17o/o 4.L7%
Non-lncentive Expenses''s45,200 S43,570 S60,839
lncentive Exoenses s3L4,027 527L,706 Stg+,sgt
Program Description
Avista contracts with one community action agency to serve our ldaho service territory low income
customers from Grangeville to Sandpoint and Post Falls to Wallace. This same agency also serves a
small county in Washington state. The agency has the infrastructure in place to income qualify potential
participants as well as provide the audit and installation of the identified measures.
A list of Avista approved measures with a high predictability of adequate cost-effectiveness is provided
to the agency each year. Other measures may be submitted for approval if cost-effectiveness is in
question. Health and human safety measures that are necessary to ensure the habitability of the home
in order for residents to benefit from energy saving investments are allowed under these programs.
The agency completes installation of efficiency measures at no cost to qualified customer.
Administrative fees are paid to the agency for delivery of these programs.
Below is the "Approved" Measure list for installation by the agency in natural gas heated homes:o insulation for ceiling, wall, floor and duct
r air infiltration. Energy Staro doors. Energy Staro windows
Below is the "Pre-Approved" Measure list the agency may consider (must receive Avista authorization
before installation):o furnaces. water heaters
r wall heaters
s6 The net-to-gross factor is assumed to be 1 for low income.
s7 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
26 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 27 ol 76
Program Activity
lnitial results of impact and process evaluations were becoming available in 20L2. The amount of
energy savings for measures being claimed in the low income residence was often in excess of what was
being used by the entire home. Adjustments were made mid-way through 2072to modify the unit
energy savings (UES) amounts for measures in the event the actual residence was utilizing far less
energy than the savings that were being claimed. This was an attempt to provide more accurate
estimates of energy savings and improve realization rates for the evaluation on 2012 participation.
Program Changes
The Low lncome Program is on-going and is reviewed on as needed. The 2012 measures mentioned in
the Program Description were available in 2011 and 2010. ln 2010 an effort began to try to manage
towards a better Total Resource Cost test. The development of the "Low lncome Total Resource Cost
Calculato/' (LITRCC) occurred in late 2009/early 2010 and has been revised and improved over time to
have a better working knowledge of where the program may be in the realm of cost-effectiveness at any
given time during the program. This process is still in place.
Low tncome - Natural Gas List of Measures
tt UES are drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their evaluation of Avista's
2011 energy efficiency programs.t' Measure lives were drawn from Avista's Technical Reference Manual as updated by Cadmus after their
evaluation of Avista's 2011 energy efficiency protrams.* Since no natural gas UES was available in the TRM, Avista used the BTU-equivalent of the electric UES.t'rbid.
t'rbid.
tt Assumed the same measure life as was used for electric duct sealing in low income homes.s Assumed the same measure life as was used for electric floor insulation in low income homes.tt Since no natural gas UES was available in the TRM, Avista used the BTU-equivalent of the electric UES
2TlPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 28 ot 76
Measure Descriotion
UES (annual
therms)58 Non-Energy Benefits
Measure
Lifese
G Air lnfiltration 0.0Usq ftil n/a 20
G Enerev Staro Doors 9.476',Rebate Amt - S50 45
G Enerev Staro Windows 22.46/home Rebate Amt -(Sq Ft * 53.99)45
G HE Furnace 103 Rebate Amt - 5700 20
G nsulation - Ceiline/Attic 56.55/home nla 45
G nsulation - Duct O.O2/sqft6z nla 1gu'
G nsulation - Floor 66.55/home nla 45*
G nsulation - Wall 66.55/home nla 45
G Programmable Thermostat t4 nla 10
Electric Clothes Washers 20L2 20tL 2010
Participants (rebates)0 0 2
Energy Savings (kwh)nla nla L0,t52
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-enerqv Benefits nla nla S3,334
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla n/a 2.07
Prosram Administrator Cost B/C ratio nla n/a 2.74
Participant B/C ratio nla n/a 3.41
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio nla n/a 0.89
Net-to-gross factor n/a'o 67.4%87.Oo/oo"
Discount Rate 7.OL%6.80%6.80o/o
Non-l ncentive Expenses nla nla SzEz
lncentive Expenses nla nla S2,s3o
NONRES - PRESCRIPTIVE CLOTHES WASHERS ELECTRIC & NATURAL GAS
tt Since net-to-Gross results on 2Ot2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
57 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
58 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
6e lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the seBment level rather than program level.
70 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2012 as
prepared by Cadmus.
71 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
72 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
23lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 29 oI 76
Natural Gas Clothes Washers 2012 20L1 20to
Participants (rebates)0 0 2
Enersv Savines (kwh) - interactive nla nla nla
Enersv Savines (Therms)nla nla 506
Non-enerev Benefits nla nla 5s,202
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla nla 1.05
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio nla nla L.44
Particioant B/C ratio n/a nla 7.42
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio nla n/a 0.61
Net-to-sross factor 67.4%67.4%87.0o/o''
Discount Rate s37%4.L7%4.L7%
Non-l ncentive Exoenses"nla nla s323
lncentive Exoenses n/a nla 5L,677
Program Description
Rebates are available for the installation of qualifying new equipment in commercial facilities with
electric service on a commercial rate schedule provided by Avista for the hot water heater. A rebate is
provided to the customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate documentation has been
provided. Customers have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The
following are the measures that were eligible for electric rebates in20L2 in this category. Any
differences from the 20L2 program offering will be addressed by year later in this document.
Clothes Washers that either meet the Energy Star@ or the Consortium for Energy Efficiency
Specifications for commercial clothes washers are eligible for a 5200 incentive per unit.
Program Activity
All rebates related to natural gas were discontinued in November 20L2. The Company's integrated
resource plan for natural gas was evaluated in 2OL2 and identified a significant drop in avoided costs. As
a result, natural gas rebate programs did not pass the cost effectiveness criteria. The Company filed a
request with the Commission to "discontinue" natural gas rebate programs temporarily. ln the event
natural gas avoided costs start to rise, these programs will be re-evaluated for cost effectiveness. This
filing was approved and natural gas rebates were no longer available as of November L,2OL2.
Other 2012 activities included meetings to help educate vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC,
insulation, builders) about Avista programs and protocol.
Program Changes
The Commercial Clothes Washer Program is on-going and changes are made on an as needed basis.
Listed below are the notable differences in the measures offered and the rebates available in those prior
program years.
20LO
The specifications for commercial clothes washers changed in 2010 and the program was modified in
May from the measures and incentive provided below to what they are currently.
5250 lncentive for Energy Star@ Equipment
5250 tncentive for CEE Tier 1 Equipment
$3S0 tncentive for CEE Tier 2 Equipment
5400 tncentive for CEE Tier 3 Equipment
Estimated Savings and Cost-effectiveness Components
RTF recommends a UES of 828 kwh at site and a measure life of 7 years. The two projects reported in
2010, one had a seven year estimated useful life and one had a ten year estimated useful life. Estimated
useful life is one of many data input for each project. Non-energy benefits were provided for each of
these projects. These were different amounts and provided by individual customers. The savings
claimed were calculated using a prescriptive clothes washer calculator.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 30 of 76
29!Page
NON RESI DENTIAL -EN ERGYSMART G ROCER ELECTRIC
2012 20tt 2010
Participants (rebates)88 L44 145
Energy Savings (kwh)1,596,096 2,430,3L3 4,872,650
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive (8e2)(8,317)(9,667)
Non-energv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 2.06 t.22 2.29
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 3.75 2.34 4.O7
Participant B/C ratio 2.65 1.98 2.30
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 1.18 0.84 1.45
Net-to-eross factor 96.00/o 96.OYo"90.004''
Discount Rate 7.0t%6.800./0 6.80%
Non-lncentiv€ EXpsl'15s5"571,797 5226,L63 ss43,484
lncentive Expenses s228,L79 s343,040 s633,453
Program Description
Customers are eligible to receive rebates and incentives on energy-efficient upgrades through the
EnergySmart Grocer Program. The program helps grocery stores, supermarkets, convenience stores, and
other customers with commercial refrigeration save money by reducing their energy use. The program
offers personalized facility assessments to identify efficiency opportunities and incentives to offset the
upfront costs of efficiency projects, making it easy and affordable for participating businesses to achieve
significant savings on their utility bills. To be eligible for incentives, customers must be Avista electric
customers on a nonresidiential rate schedule.
The following are measures that were eligible for electric rebates in20L2 through this program:
o Low Temp Open Case to Reach-in Case S1SO per linear foot of caser Medium Temp Open Case to Reach-in Case S50 per linear foot of caseo Low Temp Reach-in to High Efficiency Reach-in Case 5150 per linear foot of caseo Low Temp Coffin to High Efficiency Reach-in SSS per linear foot of caser Medium Temp Open Case to High Efficiency Open Case S20 per linear foot of caseo Special Doos with Low/No ASH for Low Temperature Reach-in 5200 per dooro Add doors to Medium Temp Walk-in Reach-in Case 5120 per linear foot of caseo Reach-in Case Light: T12 to Low Power LED, Retrofit S3t per linear foot of LEDo Reach-in Case Light: T12 to High Power LED, Retrofit SZt per linear foot of LEDo Reach-in Case Light: T8 to Low Power LED, Retrofit $21 per linear foot of LEDo Reach-in Case Light: T8 to High Pwer LED, Retrofit $tZ per linear foot of LEDo Reach-in Case Light: T8 to Low Power LED, New Case 521 per linear foot of LEDo Reach in Case Light: T8 to High Power LED, New Case S12 per linear foot of LED
73 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
7a Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
7s lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
30 lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 31 of76
r Reach-in Case Light: Add Motion Sensor to Low Power LED 51 per linear foot of LED
o Reach-in Case Light: Add Motion Sensor to High Power LED 52 per linear foot of LED
c T-LOlLZto T8, 5ft $30 per lamp
o T-tOlL2 to T8, 5 ft S30 per lampo T-LOlL2toT8,4ft S30perlampo Anti-Sweat Heat with Energy Management System $14 per linear foot of case
r Anti-Sweat Heat without Energy Management System- Med Temp S+0 per linear foot of caser Anti-Sweat Heat without Energy Management System- Low Temp SSO per linear foot of caser Evaporated Fan- Walk-ln ECM Controller- Low Temp- L|TO-L|IO HP S35 per motor controlledr Evaporated Fan- Walk-ln ECM controller- Med Temp- LllO-L120 HP S35 per motor controlledr Controls-Visi cooler SgO per controller
. Strip Curtains for Supermaket Walk-in Cooler 55 per square foot. Strip Curtains for Supermaket Walk-in Freezer 55 per square foot
. Strip Curtains for Convenience Store Walk-in Freezer SS per square foot. Strip Curtains for Restaurant Walk-in Freezer 55 per square foot
o Gaskets for Walk-in Cooler-Main Door $25 per dooro Gaskets for Walk-in Freezer-Main Door 565 per door
o Gaskets for Reach-in Glass Door, Medium Temp $25 per doorr Gaskets for Reach-in Glass Door, Low Temp $40 per door
r Auto-closers for Walk-in Freezer 5250 per closere Auto-closers for Walk-in Cooler $ZS per closer
. Auto-closers for Glass Reach-in Doors- Freezer $40 per closer. Auto-closers for Glass Reach-in Doors- Cooler $40 per closer
r Evaporator Motors- Shaded Pole to ECM in Display cases S55 per motoro Evaporator Motors- Shaded Pole to ECM in Walk-in $t+O per motor
o Evaporator Motors- Shaded Pole to PSC in Display cases $ZS per motorr Evaporator Motors- Shaded Pole to PSC in Walk-ins $+0 per motor. Condenser Fan-VSD $t00 perfan hp
r EMCs for Compressor Head Fans $80 per motor
. High Efficiency Multiplex Compressor System 5235 per tonr Efficient/Oversized Condenser for Multiples 5110 per ton
r Controls-Floating Head Pressure with Variable Freguency Drive (VFD) S80 per hpo Controls-Floating Head Pressure without VFD 560 per hp
o Controls-Floating Suction Pressure S15 per hpr Floating Head Pressure on Singles, LT condensing Unit $tOO per hpr Floating Head Pressure on Singles, MT condensing Unit $f00 per hpr Floating Head Pressure on Singles, LT Remote Condenser $t00 per hpr Floating Head Pressure on Singles, MT Remote Condenser 5100 per hpo Efficient Compressors- Low Temp $45 per ton
Program Activity
Activities in 2012 included vendor meetings with vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders)to educate about Avista programs and protocols.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 32 ol 76
31 lPage
Program Changes
The Commercial EnergySmart Program is on-going and changes are made as needed.
No significant changes have occurred.
Esti mated Savi ngs a nd Cost-effectiveness Com ponents
No UES exist for the regional EnergySmart Grocer program since this is implemented by a third-party
contractor. Therefore, the estimated savings for this program are subject to annua! evaluation. For
purposes of the most recent annual report, a 15 year useful measure life was used.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 33 of76
32 lPage
NON RESI DENTIAL -E N ERGYSMART G ROCER NATU RAt GAS
20L2 2OLL 2010
Participants (rebates)0 0 1
Enerev Savines (kwh) - interactive nla nla nla
Enersv Savinss (Therms)nla nla 2,457
Non-enerqv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla nla o.44
Prosram Administrator Cost B/C ratio nla nla 2.43
Participant B/C ratio nla nla 0.47
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio nla nla 0.77
Net-to-gross factor 96.00/o 96.4%90.oo/,"
Discount Rate 5.370/0 4.770/o 4.77%
Non-l ncentive Expenses'o nla n/a s3,349
lncentive Expenses nla n/a s3,790
Program Description
Customers are eligible to receive rebates and incentives on energy-efficient upgrades through the
EnergySmart Grocer Program. The program helps grocery stores, supermarkets, convenience stores, and
other customers with commercial refrigeration save money by reducing their energy use. The program
offers personalized facility assessments to identify efficiency opportunities and incentives to offset the
upfront costs of efficiency projects, making it easy and affordable for participating businesses to achieve
significant savings on their utility bills. To be eligible for incentives, customers must be Avista retail
natural gas customers on a non-residiential rate schedule. Naturalgas measures are done on a custom
basis.
Program Activity
All rebates related to natural gas were discontinued in November 20L2. The Company's integrated
resource plan for natural gas was evaluated in 2Ot2 and identified a significant drop in avoided costs. As
a result, natural gas rebate programs would not pass the cost effectiveness criteria. The Company filed a
request to the Commission to "discontinue" natural gas rebate programs temporarily. ln the event
natural gas avoided costs start to rise, these programs will be re-evaluated for cost-effectiveness. This
filing was approved and natural gas rebates were no longer available as of November 1,20L2.
Other 2012 activities included vendor meetings with vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders) to educate about Avista programs and protocols.
Program Changes
The Commercial EnergySmart Grocer Program is on-going and changes are made as needed.
76 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
77 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
78 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
33!Page
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 34 o'176
Estimated Savi ngs a nd Cost-effectiveness Co mponents
No UES exist forthe regional EnergySmart Grocer program since this is implemented by a third-party
contractor. Therefore, the program is subject to annual evaluation and a 15 year measure life is used for
cost-eff ective ness pu rposes.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avisla
Schedule 1, Page 35 of76
34 lPage
NONRESIDENTIAL - FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT ELECTRIC
2012 20Lt 2010
Particioa nts (rebates)2L 31 28
Enersv Savinss (kwh)111,500 242,269 7t0,27L
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-energv Benefits s9,7s3 sL3,720 s8,436
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio L.77 1.68 2.O7
Prosram Administrator Cost B/C ratio 4.6t 4.85 7.65
Participant B/C ratio 2.OL 2.05 1.26
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 7.O7 0.98 \.76
Net-to-gross factor 67.40/o 67.4o/o""87.Oo/o
Discount Rate 7.O7o/o 6.8oo/o 6.80%
Non-lncentive Expenses"'s4,985 Ss,38s s3.98s
lncentive Expenses s12,060 s22.169 s13,03s
Program Description
Rebates are available for the installation of qualifying food service equipment in commercial facilities
with electric service on a commercial rate schedule provided by Avista. A rebate is provided to the
customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers
have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The following are the
measures that were eligible for electric rebates in 2012 in this category. Any differences from the 2012
program offering will be addressed by year later in this document.
Commercial Frver (Electric)
The commercial fryer must meet ENERGY STARo specifications for energy efficiency or must have a
tested heavy load cooking energy efficiency of >80% utilizing ASTM Standard F1351. lncentive is S150
each.
Commercial Steam Cooker (Electric)
The commercial steam cooker must meet ENERGY STARo specifications for energy efficiency or must
have a tested heavy load potato cooking energy efficiency of >5O% utilizing ASTM Standard F1484.
lncentives are S+50 for a 3 Pan Steam Cooker, $570 for a 4 Pan Steam Cooker, 5540 for a 5 Pan Steam
Cooker and $720 for a 5 Pan Steam Cooker.
" Since net-to-Gross results on 20L2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
80 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
81 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
82 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
35 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 36 of76
Hot Food Holdine Cabinets (Electric)
The hot food holding cabinets must meet ENERGY STARo specifications for energy efficiency. lncentives
are 5300 for an electric hot food holding cabinet 9 to 12 feet, 5400 for an electric hot food holding
cabinet 12 to 18 feet, and SSOO tor an electric hot food holding cabinet over 8 feet.
Commercial Solid Door and Glass Door Refrigerators
The refrigeration system must be built-in (packaged). Cases with remote refrigeration systems do not
qualify. ENERGY STARo product lists for qualifying commercial refrigerators can be found at
www.enerqvstar.sov. lncentives are S50 for a solid 1 door Energy Star refrigerator, S70 for a solid 2 door
Energy Star refrigerator, S90 for a solid 3 door Energy Star refrigerator, S50 for a glass 1 door Energy
Star refrigerator, S80 for a glass 2 door Energy Star refrigerator and St00 for a glass 3 door Energy Star
refrigerator.
Commercial Solid Door Frezers
The refrigeration system must be built-in (packaged). Cases with remote refrigeration systems do not
qualify. ENERGY STAR product lists for qualifying commercial freezers can be found at
www.energvstar.sov. lncentives are S70 for a solid 1 door Energy Star freezer, SttO for a solid 2 door
Energy Star freezer and 5140 for a solid 3 door Energy Star freezer.
Vent Hood Controls
This rebate applies toward the purchase and installation of a new commercial kitchen exhaust hood
control system installed in a dedicated commercial kitchen exhaust hood and make-up air system. lf the
vent hood has a dedicated make-up air unit (MAU)then the MAU fan must also be controlled to receive
rebate. ln this case, rebates are available for vent hood controls as well as for the installation of a VFD
on the make-up air unit. lncentives are S6SO/kCFM for Vent Hood Variable Speed Control with Electric
Space Heat and S650/kCFM and S130/HP for Combined Variable Speed Control of Vent Hood Make-Up
Air Unit and Vent Hood Variable Speed Control with Electric Space Heat.
Commercial Convection Oven (Electric)
The tested oven must meet or exceed heavy load potato cooking energy efficiency of >7O% utilizing
ASTM Standard F1495. lncentives are 5400 each.
Com mercial Combination Oven (Electric)
The tested oven must meet or exceed heavy load cooking energy efficiency of >600A utilizing ASTM
Standard F1639. lncentives are 51,000 each.
Commercial Griddle (Elecffic)
The tested griddle must meet or exceed heavy load cooking efficiency of 27Ooti utilizing ASTM Standard
FL275. lncentives are 5250 each.
Commercial Dishwashers
Qualifying dishwashers must meet ENERGY STARo specifications. lncentives are 5250 each for under
counter, 51,000 for Single Tank Door Type, $1,500 for Single Tank Conveyor and 52,000 for Multi Tank
Conveyor.
Commercial lce Machines
Qualifying ice machines must be ENERGY STARo (or equivalent CEE Tier 2) or CEE Tier 3. Air-cooled
machines (self-contained, ice making heads or remote condensing) are eligible. Water-cooled machines
36!Page
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AW-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 37 ol 76
are eligible if they are installed on a closed loop or remote evaporative condenser system. The test
method must be in accordance with the Air Conditioning and Refrigeration lnstitute (ARl) Standard 810.
To qualify, the entire ARI tested ice making system must be purchased. Remote machines must be
purchased with qualifying remote condenser or remote condenser/compressor units. lncentives are as
follows:
ENERGY STARo or CEE Tier 2 lce Machines
o $100/Each for a 101-200 lbs/day capacityo $L2SlEach for a 201-300 lbs/day capacityo $125/Each for a 301-400 lbs/day capacityo $125lEach for a 401-500 lbs/day capacityc $L2S/Each for a 501-1000 lbs/day capacity
o $200/Each for a 1001-1500 lbs/day capacityo S380/Each for a Over 1500 lbs/day capacity
Super Efficient CEE Tier 3 lce Machines
o $200/Each for a 101-200 lbs/day capacityo S2OOlEach for a 201-300 lbs/day capacityo $200/Each for a 301-400 lbs/day capacityc $200/Each for a 401-500 lbs/day capacity
. |z}OlEach for a 501-1000 lbs/day capacity. S300/Each for a 1001-1500 lbs/day capacity
. S500/Each for a Over 1500 lbs/day capacity
Program Activity
Activities in 2OL2 included vendor meetings with vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders) to educate about Avista programs and protocols.
Program Changes
The Commercial Food Service Equipment Program is on-going and changes are made on an as needed
basis. Listed below are the notable differences in the measures offered and the rebates available in
those prior program years.
20LO
August 1,2O7O, Avista eliminated Hot Water Circulating Pump Time clocks and the CEE Tier 2
Refrigerators and Freezers. The incentives were changed for the solid door refrigerators as follows:
Solid l Door
Solid 2 Door
Solid 3 Door
was S7owas SgOwas S14o
changed to SSO
changed to SZO
changed to S90
Avista eliminated the stand alone measure of Variable Speed Control of Vent Hood Make-Up Air Unit
and added two new additional measures to combine this measure with Vent Hood Variable Speed
Control with Electric Space Heat.
The measures above were offered at the following incentives:
3TlPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule '1, Page 38 of 76
Time clock Control of Electric Hot Water Heater Circulating Pump - The time clock is to turn off the DHW
recirculation pump after facility operating hours. lncentive is $40 per unit.
CEE Tier 2Freezer, Solid l Door
CEE Tier 2Freezer, Solid 2 Door
CEE Tier 2Freezer, Solid 3 Door
Stso each
5200 Each
5250 Each
CEE Tier 2 Refrigerator, Solid 1 Door 5100 Each
CEE Tier 2 Refrigerator, Solid 2Door S1SO fach
CEE Tier 2 Refrigerator, Solid 3 Door 5200 Each
CEE Tier 2 Refrigerator, Glass 1 Door St00 fach
CEE Tier 2 Refrigerator, Glass 2 Door StS0 fach
CEE Tier 2, Refrigerator, Glass 3 Door 5200 Each
Esti mated Savi ngs a nd Cost-effectiveness Co m ponents
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive food service program but is rather calculated through a
prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are subject to annual evaluation.
Historically, Avista has used a L2 year useful measure life for cost-effectiveness purposes.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 39 of76
38!Page
20L2 20tL 2010
Participants (rebates)6 10 7
Energy Savings (kwh) - interactive nla n/a nla
Energy Savings (Therms)10,159 5,340 L2,721
Non-enersv Benefits 52,2L0 S10,533 54,397
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.74 1.08 0.89
Prosram Administrator Cost B/C ratio 1.86 2.38 3.99
Participant B/C ratio L.42 L.44 L.O2
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.57 0.81 0.87
Net-to-sross factor 67.4o/o""67.4%*87.Oo/o""
Discount Rate 5.37o/o 4.L7%4.L7o/o
Non-l ncentive Expenseso"s14,688 58,2s2 S3,349
lncentive Expenses s8,041 S10,47o s12,365
NONRESIDENTIAL - FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT NATURAL GAS
Program Description
Rebates are available for the installation of qualifying food service equipment in commercial facilities
with retail natural gas service provided by Avista. A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of
purchase and other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from
installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate.
The following are the measures that were eligible for naturalgas rebates in20L2 in this category. Any
differences from the 2OL2 grogram offering will be addressed by year later in this document.
Commercial Frver (Natural Gas)
The commercial fryer must meet ENERGY STARo specifications for energy efficiency or must have a
tested heavy load cooking energy efficiency of 25Oo/o utilizing ASTM Standard F1361. lncentive is SSOO
each.
Commercial Steam Cooker (Natural Gas)
The commercial steam cooker must meet ENERGY STAR@ specifications for energy efficiency or must
have a tested heavy load potato cooking energy efficiency of 238o/o utilizing ASTM Stand ard F7484.
lncentive is 5500 for 3 Pan Steam Cooker, SS+0 for a 4 Pan Steam Cooker, SSSO for a 5 Pan Steam
Cooker and 5630 for 5 Pan Steam Cooker.
t'Since net-to-Gross results on2OL2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.e Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 20L2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
8s Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
85 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
3glPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 40 of 76
Vent Hood Controls
This rebate applies toward the purchase and installation of a new commercial kitchen exhaust hood
control system installed in a dedicated commercial kitchen exhaust hood and make-up air system. lf the
vent hood has a dedicated make-up air unit (MAU)then the MAU fan must also be controlled to receive
rebate. ln this case, rebates are available for vent hood controls as well as for the installation of a VFD
on the make-up air unit. lncentives are S550/kCFM for Vent Hood Variable Speed Control with Natural
Gas Space Heat and S540/kCFM & S130/HP for Combined Variable Speed Control of Vent Hood Make-
Up Air Unit and Vent Hood Variable Speed Controlwith Natural Gas Space Heat
Commercial Convection Oven (Natural Gas)
The tested oven must meet or exceed heavy load potato cooking energy efficiency of >40% utilizing
ASTM Standard F1496. lncentives are 5500 each.
Commercial Combination Oven (Natural Gas)
The tested oven must meet or exceed heavy load cooking energy efficiency of 24O% utilizing ASTM
Standard F1639. lncentives are S1,000 each.
Commercial Rack Oven (Natural Gas)
The tested rack oven must meet or exceed baking energy efficiency of 25Oo/o utilizing ASTM Standard
F2093. lncentives are S1,000 for a single oven and 52,000 for a double oven.
Commercial Griddle (Natu ral Gas)
The tested griddle must meet or exceed heavy load cooking efficiency of >40% utilizing ASTM Standard
Ft275. lncentives are 5250 each.
Com mercia I Dishwashers
Qualifying dishwashers must meet ENERGY STARo specifications. lncentives are S2S0 each for
undercounter, 51,000 for Single Tank Door Type, $1,500 for Single Tank Conveyor and S2,OOO for Multi
Tank Conveyor.
Program Activity
All rebates related to natural gas were discontinued in November 20L2. The Company's integrated
resource plan for natural gas was evaluated in 2072 and identified a significant drop in avoided costs. As
a result, natural gas rebate programs would not pass the cost effectiveness criteria. The Company filed a
request to the Commission to "discontinue" natural gas rebate programs temporarily. ln the event
natural gas avoided costs start to rise, these programs will be re-evaluated for cost effectiveness. This
filing was approved and naturalgas rebates were no longer available as of November L,2OL2.
Other 2012 activities included meetings to help educate vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC,
insulation, builders) about Avista programs and protocol.
Program Changes
The Commercial Food Service Equipment Program is on-going and changes are made on an as needed
basis. Listed below are the notable differences in the measures offered and the rebates available in
those prior program years.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule'1, Page 4'l of 76
40 lPage
2010
August L,2OLO Avista eliminated the High Efficiency (HE) Natural Gas Hot Water Heaters and Hot Water
Circulating Pump Time clocks and the HE Gas Char Broiler. Avista eliminated the stand alone measure of
Variable Speed Control of Vent Hood Make-Up Air Unit and added two new measures to combine this
measure with Vent Hood Variable Speed Controlwith Natural Gas Heat.
The measures above were offered at the following incentives:
High Efficienry Gas Hot Water Heaters - To qualify for a rebate, the hot water heater must have an
energy factor of equal to or greaterthan 64%. Qualifying hot water heaters can be determined using
GAMA's Consume/s Directory of Certified Efficiency Ratings for Heating and Water Heating Equipment
www.samanet.ors. lncentives of S50 per unit.
High Efficiency Condensing Natural Gas Hot Water Heater, Over 75,000 BTU/HR - To qualify for a rebate,
the hot water heater must have an energy factor of equal to or greater than 90%. Qualifying hot water
heaters can be determined using GAMA's Consume/s Directory of Certified Efficiency Ratings for
Heating and Water Heating Equipment www.samanet.ors. lncentives are S50 per unit. lncentives are
51,000 for 75,000 BTU/hr to 250,000 BTU/hr capacity and 52,000 for units over 250,000 BTU/hr
capacity.
Point of Use Natural Gas Hot Water Heater - To qualify for a rebate, the tankless hot water heater must
have a thermal efficienry of equal to or greater than 83% or and energy factor of equal to or greater
than 69%. Qualifoing hot water heaters can be determined using GAMA's Consume/s Directory of
Certified Efficiency Ratings for Heating and Water Heating Equipment www.samanet.ors. lncentives are
$60 per unit.
Timeclock Control of Natural Gas Hot Water Heater Circulating Pump - The timeclock is to turn off the
DHW recirculation pump after faciltiy operating hours. lncentive is $40 per unit.
High Efficiency Natural Gas Char Broiler - The char broiler cooking energy density is not to exceed 10.4
kBTu/fr/sq/ft or cooking grid area. The efficiency must be based on the ASTM Standard Test Method
F1595-03. lncentive is 5400 per unit.
Estimated Savings and Cost-effectiveness Components
No UES exists for the natural gas prescriptive food service program but is rather calculated through a
prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are subject to annual evaluation.
Historically, Avista has used a L2 year useful measure life for cost-effectiveness purposes.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 42 oI 76
41 lPage
NONRESIDENTIAL- GREEN MOTORS REWIND ELECTRIC
2012 20tt 2010
Particioants ( rebates)L4 38 19
Enersv Savinss (kwh)14,481 29,990 57,425
Enersv Savines (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-enersv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 1.85 L.42 2.99
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 3.76 3.57 4.01
Participant B/C ratio 2.04 1.61 5.58
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio L.2L 1.04 1.38
Net-to-eross factor 67.4o/oo'67.4o/oo"87.0%
Discount Rate 7.0L%6.80%6.80%
Non-lncentive Exoenses"Ss+e Ssss 54,t24
lncentive Expenses 5L,740 S3,3oo s5.750
Program Description
lncentives of $1 per horsepower are available for Green Rewinds of NEMA rated motors from 15 hp -
500 hp. lncentives are paid as an instant rebate on the invoice from a participating service center. To be
eligible for this rebate, you must be an Avista electric customer on a non-residiential rate schedule.
Program Activity
2012 activities included meetings to help educate vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders) about Avista programs and protocol.
Program Changes
This program has had no significant changes during the 2010-2012 time period.
Estimated Savings and Cost-effectiveness Components
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive green motors rewind program. The estimated savings are
calculated through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are
subject to annual evaluation. Historically, Avista has used a 10 year useful measure life for cost-
effectiveness pu rposes.
t' Since net-to-Gross results on 20L2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
88 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
8e Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.s lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
42 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 43 ot 76
NONRESTDENTTAL- HVAC VARIABLE FREqUENCY DRTVES ELECTRTC
20L2 20tt 2010
Particioants (rebates)2 13 5
Enersy Savings (kwh)61,555 !,473,L47 t39,626
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-enersv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 3.19 2.55 5.24
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 6.80 6.54 8.51
Participant B/C ratio 2.78 2.6t 6.18
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 1.55 t.28 t.75
Net-to-gross factor 67.4o/o"67.4yo"87.0o/o'"
Discount Rate 7.Ot%6.80%6.8004
Non-l ncentive Expenses'"S3,4s9 s42,3ss S5,716
lncentive Expenses s4.sss S118,29s S11,o4o
Program Description
lncentives apply to retrofits of variable frequency drives installed on commercial heating, ventilation and
air conditioning equipment served on an Avista nonresidential rate schedule. New construction projects
are not eligible for incentives. lnclude primary pumps and fans only; secondary or spare pumps or fans
do not qualify. A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate
documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply
for an Avista rebate.
The following are the measures that were eligible for rebates in 2Ot2 in this category. Any differences
from the 2OL2 program offering will be addressed by year later in this document. Rebates are for the
following applications:
o Supply fan or supply air handler
o Boiler feed water pump
. Supply fan on VAV packaged or rooftop HVAC unit
o Cooling tower pump
o Return fan of return air handler
o Chilled water pump
o Return fan on VAV packaged or rooftop HVAC unit
r Condensing water pump
o Building exhaust fan
t' Since net-to-Gross results on 2Ot2 programs was not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
e2 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2012 as
prepared by Cadmus.
e3 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.s lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
43 lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 'l , Page 44 0'176
lncentives are paid at S80/HP for VFD Fans, S85/HP for VFD Cooling Pump only and $100/HP for VFD
Heating Pump only or Combined Heating and Cooling Pump.
Program Activity
Activities in2Ot2 included vendor meetings with vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders) to educate about Avista programs and protocols. Mailings to vendors and past participants
went out in 2011to inform of program changes.
Program Changes
This program was modified in April of 2Otlto only allow for retrofits due to new construction code
changes that occurred in 2010.
Esti mated Savi ngs a nd Cost-effectiveness Co m ponents
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive HVAC VFD program. The estimated savings are calculated
through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are subject to
annual evaluation. Avista engineers estimate the useful life for each nonresidential project. For VFDs
the estimated useful life varies from 10 to 15 years.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 45 of 76
tl4lPage
NONRESIDENTIAI- STANDBY GENERATOR BLOCK HEATER ELECTRIC
20t2 20tL 2010
Participants (rebates)5 4 nla
Enercv Savinps (kwh)9,442 6,t12 nla
Enersv Savinss (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-energv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio L.94 0.59 nla
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 3.25 2.43 n/a
Participant B/C ratio 3.61 0.65 nla
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.94 0.80 nla
Net-to-cross factor 67.4o/o 67.4o/o'"87.Oo/o''
Discount Rate 7.07%6.80%6.80o/o
Non-l ncentive Exoenses Sszr st74 nla
lncentive Exoenses Sz,ooo s1,500 nla
Program Description
lncentives are available for a retrofit from a thermosiphon circulating block heater to a pump driven
circulating block heater that operates continuously. Rebates are available for commercialfacilities with
electric service provided by Avista Utilities on a nonresidential rate schedule. lncentives are offered at
S+00 per heater. A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate
documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply
for an Avista rebate.
Program Activity
2012 activities included meetings to help educate vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders) about Avista programs and protocol. Mailings to vendors and customers that may have a
standby generator went out when the program was rolled out.
Program Changes
This program was rolled out in April of 2011 and has had no changes.
Esti mated Savi ngs a nd Cost-effectiven ess Com ponents
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive standby generator block heater program. The estimated
savings are calculated through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this
program are subject to annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 16 years for cost-
effectiveness pu rposes.
" Since net-to-Gross results on 2OL2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
e5 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June 12, 2012 as
prepared by Cadmus.
e7 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
e8 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
45tPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 46 of 76
NONRESIDENTIAT - POWER MANAGEMENT FOR PC NETWORKS ETECTRIC
2012 20tt 20LO
Pa rticipants ( rebates)1 nla nla
Enersv Savinss (kwh)2L,OOO nla n/a
Energv Savinss (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-enersv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.98 n/a nla
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 3.70 n/a nla
Participant B/C ratio 0.85 nla nla
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 1.10 nla nla
Net-to-sross factor 67.4o/o"67.4%o'u"87.lo/o'ut
Discount Rate 7.070/o 6.80%6.800./0
Non-l ncentive Expenses"'s544 n/a n/a
lncentive Expenses S2,1oo nla n/a
Program Description
Rebates are available for the installation of qualifying software in commercialfacilities with electric
service provided by Avista on a commercial rate schedule. This incentive is for installing a network
based power management software solution. The software must provide regular energy use reports
with overall average personal computer (PC) energy savings. The software must control every available
level of power management offered by the PC hardware and monitor at the time of installation. Achieve
a minimum average savings of 100 annual kWh per controlled PC. Provide usage data prior to
installation of controls for two consecutive weeks during a normal operating period. This data will be
used for comparison of usage once controls are installed. Software must remain operational for a
minimum of 3 years with the ability for continued reporting every six months of savings/use data upon
Avista's request. lncentives are paid at S10 per controlled PC. A rebate is provided to the customer after
proof of purchase and other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days
from installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate.
Program Activity
Activities in 20t2 included vendor meetings with vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders) to educate about Avista programs and protocols.
Program Changes
There have been no significant program changes.
* Since net-to-Gross results on 20t2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
1m Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
101 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus,
102 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
45 lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 47 ot76
Esti mated Savi ngs a nd Cost-effectiven ess Com ponents
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive standby power management for the PC networks program.
The estimated savings are calculated through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings
for this program are subject to annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 8 years for
cost-eff ectiveness pu rposes.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, AMsta
Schedule 1 , Page 48 of 76
4TlPage
NON RESI DENTIAL - DEMAN D.CONTROLLED VENTI LATION E LECTRIC
20L2 20tt 2010
Participants ( rebates)nla 3 4
Energy Savings (kwh)nla 29,483 23,676
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-energv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla 3.53 2.51
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio n/a 7.24 5.05
Participant B/C ratio nla 5.38 2.64
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio nla L.t4 7.37
Net-to-eross factor 67.4Yo'u"67.4%87.0%
Discount Rate 7.07%6.80%6.80%
Non-l ncentive Exoenses"o nla s842 ssss
lncentive Exoenses nla 5z,oqz s3.275
Program Description
Avista offers incentives for installing ventilation controls on existing buildings that use carbon dioxide
levels to measure occupancy and modify the percentage of outside air based on variable levels. Rather
than setting intake rates for maximum occupancy levels at alltimes, demand-controlled ventilation
measures the approximate number of people occupying a space and resets the intake rates based on
that measurement. ln order to be eligible for incentives, conditioned spaces must be kept between 55
and 75 degrees during operating hours. lncentives are based on the total square footage ofthe
controlled conditioned space with a 2,000 square feet minimum. lncentives will be paid at a rate of S.25
per square foot with a cap of 2,500 square foot per sensor. lf the space has portable walls, each room
must be controlled separately. Controlled space must meet a minimum of ASHREA 62 standards. This
program is available where the fuel source used to heat the conditioned space must be purchased from
Avista, A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate
documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply
for an Avista rebate. The incentive for this measure is the square feet of controlled space times .25.
Program Activity
We did not have any activity for this program in 2072, as the program was discontinued in 2011.
Program Changes
The Demand Controlled Ventilation program ran the same in 2010 and 2011. The program was
discontinued in September of 2OLL and customers had until December to submit paperuvork for rebates.
'ot Since net-to-Gross results on 20L2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-
to-gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
1@ Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June t2,2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
10s Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
106 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
48 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 49 of76
Esti mated Savi ngs a nd Cost-effectiveness Components
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive demand-controlled ventilation program. The estimated
savings are calculated through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this
program are subject to annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 16 years for cost-
effectiveness purposes.
6i ril;
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AW-E-1 3 AW-GI 3
C. Drake, Avista
Sdtedule 1, Page 50 of76
NONRESIDENTIAL - DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION NATURAL GAS
2012 20tt 2010
Pa rticipants ( rebates)nla 2 3
Energy Savings (kwh)- interactive nla nla nla
Enersy Savinss (Therms)nla 783 1.3L4
Non-enersv Benefits n/a nla Sq,ggt
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla 1..32 0.45
Prosram Administrator Cost B/C ratio nla 3.19 o.79
Participant B/C ratio nla L.75 1.10
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio nla o.92 0.43
Net-to-sross factor 67.4%67.4o/o 87.Oo/o
Discount Rate 5.37o/o 4.L7%4.t7%
Non-l ncentive Expenses'nla Sr,gzs s7s2
lncentive Expenses nla ses0 s8.100
Program Description
Avista offers incentives for installing ventilation controls on existing buildings that use carbon dioxide
levels to measure occupancy and modify the percentage of outside air based on variable levels. Rather
than setting intake rates for maximum occupancy levels at all times, demand-controlled ventilation
measures the approximate number of people occupying a space and resets the intake rates based on
that measurement. ln order to be eligible for incentives, conditioned spaces must be kept between 65
and 75 degrees during operating hours. lncentives are based on the total square footage ofthe
controlled conditioned space with a 2,000 square feet minimum. lncentives will be paid at a rate of S.25
per square foot with a cap of 2,500 square foot per sensor. lf the space has portable walls, each room
must be controlled separately. Controlled space must meet a minimum of ASHREA 52 standards. This
program is available where the fuel source used to heat the conditioned space must be purchased from
Avista. A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate
documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply
for an Avista rebate. The incentive for this measure is the square feet of controlled space times .25.
Program Activity
We did not have any activity for this program in 20L2, as the program was discontinued in 2011.
Program Changes
The Demand Controlled Ventilation program ran the same in 2010 and 2011. The program was
discontinued in September of 20L7 and customers had until December to submit paperwork for rebates.
'o' Since net-to-Gross results on 2O!2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
1m Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June t2,2Ot2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
1@ Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
110 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
50 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule '1, Page 51 of 76
Esti mated Savings a nd Cost-eff ectiveness Co m ponents
No UES exists for the natural gas prescriptive demand-controlled ventilation program but is rather
calculated through a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are subject to
annual evaluation. Historically, Avista has used a 16 year useful measure life for cost-effectiveness
purposes.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 52o176
51 lPage
NONRESIDENTIAL - PRESCRIPTIVE WINDOWS & INSULATION ETECTRIC
2012 20Lt 2010
Participants ( rebates)19 18 nla
Energy Savings (kwh)96,189 40,687 nla
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-enersv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 2.8L L.92 nla
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 4.77 4.89 nla
Participant B/C ratio 3.95 3.04 nla
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 7.29 0.86 nla
Net-to-gross factor 67.4o/o"'67.40/o 87.0o/o
Discount Rate 7.OtYo 6.8Oo/o 6.80%
Non-l ncentive Expenses s6.737 S1,515 nla
lncentive Expenses s1s,808 S6,12s nla
Program Description
Rebates are available for the installation of qualifying insulation and window measures in commercial
facilities with electric service as the primary heat source provided by Avista. A rebate is provided to the
customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers
have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The following are the
measures that were eligible for electric rebates in 2OL2 in this category. Any differences from the 2012
program offering will be addressed by year later in this document.
New Construction Windows with a U-Factor less than or equalto 0.30 and a solar heat gain coefficient
less than or equal to 035 is eligible for an incentive of St.OO per square foot.
Retrofit Windows with a U-Factor less than or equal to 0.30 and a solar heat gain coefficient less than or
equal to 0.35 is eligible for an incentive of 53.40 per square foot.
Wall lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R4 or less and new R-Value at least R11 and up to
R18 is eligible for an incentive of 50.30 per square foot.
Wall lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R4 or less and new R-Value at least R19 or greater is
eligible for an incentive of 50.35 per square foot.
Attic lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R11 or less and new R-Value at least R30 and up to
R44 is eligible for an incentive of 50.28 per square foot.
"' Since net-to-Gross results on 2OL2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-
to-gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
112 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June t2,2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
113 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
114 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
52 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 53 of 76
Wall lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R11 or less and new R-Value at least R45 or greater is
eligible for an incentive of 50.35 per square foot.
Roof lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R11 or less and new R-Value at least R30 or greater is
eligible for an incentive of S0.28 per square foot.
Program Activity
Activities in 2OL2 included meetings to help educate vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders) about Avista programs and protocols.
Program Changes
The CommercialWindows and lnsulation Program is an on-going program and changes are made as
needed. This program was rolled out in January of 2011 and no significant changes have been made.
Estimated Savings and Cost-effectiveness Components
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive demand-controlled ventilation program. The estimated
savings are calculated through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this
program are subject to annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 22 years for cost-
effectiveness pu rposes.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 'l, Page 54 of 76
53 lPage
NONRESIDENTIAL - PRESCRIPTIVE WINDOWS & INSUIATION NATURAI GAS
2012 20tt 20to
Participants (rebates)2t t4 nla
Energy Savings (kwh) - interactive nla nla nla
Enersv Savinss (Therms)8,737 2,333 nla
Non-enersv Benefits nla n/a nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.59 L.72 nla
Prosram Administrator Cost B/C ratio 1.29 3.58 nla
Participant B/C ratio L.4L 2.67 n/a
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.48 0.94 nla
Net-to-gross factor 67.4o/o"'67.4o/o""87.0o/o"'
Discount Rate 5.37%4.L7%4.17o/o
Non-l ncentiv€ Expenses's19,898 53,2L7 n/a
lncentive Expenses s24,242 S5,t95 nla
Program Description
Rebates are available for the installation of qualifying insulation and window measures in commercial
facilities with electric service as the primary heat source provided by Avista. A rebate is provided to the
customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers
have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The following are the
measures that were eligible for natural gas rebates in 2OL2 in this category. Any differences from the
2OL2 program offering will be addressed by year later in this document.
New Construction Windows with a U-Factor less than or equal to 0.30 and a solar heat gain coefficient
less than or equal to 035 is eligible for an incentive of 51.00 per square foot.
Retrofit Windows with a U-Factor less than or equal to 0.30 and a solar heat gain coefficient less than or
equal to 0.35 is eligible for an incentive of $3.40 per square foot.
Wall lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R4 or less and new R-Value at least R11 and up to
R18 is eligible for an incentive of 50.30 per square foot.
Wall lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R4 or less and new R-Value at least R19 or greater is
eligible for an incentive of SO.ES per square foot.
Attic lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R11 or less and new R-Value at least R30 and up to
R44 is eligible for an incentive of 50.28 per square foot.
"t Since net-to-Gross results on 2012 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
116 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
117 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
'18 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
54 lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 55 of 76
Wall lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R11 or less and new R-Value at least R45 or greater is
eligible for an incentive of 50.35 per square foot.
Roof lnsulation for retrofits with existing insulation R11 or less and new R-Value at least R30 or greater is
eligible for an incentive of 50.28 per square foot.
Program Activity
All rebates related to natural gas were discontinued in November 20t2. The Company's integrated
resource plan for natural gas was evaluated in 2Ot2 and identified a significant drop in avoided costs. As
a result, natural gas rebate programs were not passing the cost effectiveness criteria. The Company filed
a request to the Commission to temporarily "discontinue" natural gas rebate programs. ln the event
natural gas avoided costs start to rise, these programs will be re-evaluated for cost effectiveness. This
filing was approved and natural gas rebates were no longer available as of November L,2Ot2.
Other 2012 activities included meetings to help educate vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC,
insulation, builders) about Avista programs and protocols.
Program Changes
The Commercial Windows and lnsulation Program is an on-going program and changes are made as
needed. This program was rolled out in January of 2011 and no significant changes have been made.
Esti mated Savings a nd Cost-effectiveness Co m ponents
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive demand-controlled ventilation program. The estimated
savings are calculated through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this
program are subject to annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 22years for cost-
effectiveness pu rposes.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 56 of76
55 lPage
NONRESIDENTIAL - PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTORS ELECTRIC
2012 20tt 2010
Participants (rebates)nla 10 L4
Enersv Savinss (kwh)n/a L48,436 308,757
Enersv Savines (Therms) - interactive nla nla nla
Non-enersv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla t.94 3.58
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio nla 3.48 6.96
Participant B/C ratio n/a 3.09 2.85
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio n/a 1.01 1.89
Net-to-sross factor 67.4o/orre 67.4o/o12o 87.OYo"'
Discount Rate 7.01o/o 6.80%6.80o/o
Non-l ncentive ExDenses"'nla s8,061 s10,884
lncentive Exoenses nla s2o,43o s43,020
Program Description
Rebates are available for new motors that are in continuous operation only and must be listed on the
CEE Premium Efficiency Motors list. The new motor must be in a commercial facility with electric service
provided by Avista on a commercial rate schedule. A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of
purchase and other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from
installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The following are the measures and
incentives that were eligible for rebates in2012 in this category. Any differences from the 2012
program offering will be addressed by year later in this document.
Program Activity
ln 2011, activities included vendor meetings with vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders) to educate about Avista programs and protocols. ln addition, mailings were sent to vendors
and past participants to inform them of program changes. Program manager visited motor distributors
to educate and get input regarding program changes.
Program Changes
The Premium Efficiency Motor Program is on-going and changes are made on an as needed basis. Listed
below are the notable differences in the measures offered and the rebates available in those prior
program years.
"' Since net-to-Gross results on 2OL2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-
to-gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
120 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's2OtL Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
121 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
122 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
56!Page
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-'|3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule I, Page 57 ot76
20LL
This program was modified in July of 201t due to standard changes that occurred in December of 2010.
We changed our program to stilloffer incentives for motors that were above standard efficiency. The
rebate was also changed to require that all motors be in continuous operation and be between 1 and
200 horsepower. To qualify, motors must be on the CEE Premium Efficiency Motors List.
2010
The incentives that were offered are listed below.
HorsePower
7
1.5
2
3
ODP inc
sso.oo
TEFC inc
sso.oo
s2s.00
s20.00
s2s.oo
sroo.oo
s14o.oo
S2oo.oo
s3oo.oo
s2s0.00
S19o.oo
s2so.oo
s5s0.00
s6s0.oo
ssso.oo
STso.oo
5
7.5
10
15
20
25
30
40
50
50
75
100
125
150
200
sloo.oo
s11o.oo
s80,oo
s10s.00
slso.oo
s180.00
S2oo.oo
s2so.oo
s2s0.00
s2s0.00
s4oo.oo
SsTs.oo
s640.oo
s87s.00
Esti mated Savings a nd Cost-effectiveness Com ponents
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive premium efficiency motors program. The estimated savings
are calculated through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are
subject to annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 15 years for cost-effectiveness
purposes.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 58 of76
5TlPage
NON RESI DENTIAI - PRESCRI PTIVE SI DE.STREAM FI TTRATION ELECTRIC
20L2 20tL 2010
Particioants (rebates)nla 2 nla
Enerev Savinss (kwh)nla 155,730 nla
Enerev Savinss (Therms) - interactive nla nla n/a
Non-enersv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla 0.57 n/a
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio nla 3.67 nla
Particioant B/C ratio nla o.4t nla
Rate lmoact Measure B/C ratio nla L.14 nla
Net-to-sross factor 67,4%67.4o/o 87.0o/o
Discount Rate 7.070/o 6.80%6.800/o
Non-l ncentive ExDenses"o nla 5+,zzt nla
lncentive Exoenses nla s24,300 nla
Program Description
Avista offers incentives forthe installation of permanent side-stream filtration systems on open loop
chiller/coolinB tower systems. Side-stream filtration systems are easily installed on new or existing
systems. Side-Stream filtration does not replace normal maintenance, but helps the equipment operate
more efficiently between normal cleaning and inspections. This program helps keep the exterior water
loop cleaner and therefore makes the exchange of heating or cooling more efficient. Customers must
have Avista electric service, a minimum filter efficiency of at least 75 percent, must filter at least 2
percent of the full chilled water circuit flow and must have automatic backwash system and controls.
The filter medis must remove particles 0.5 microns and greater in size. lf chiller and cooling tower
systems are interconnected, the entire system must be filtered. This incentive is only available for open
loop evaporative cooling tower/chiller systems. Normal annual teardown, inspection and maintenance
of the chiller must still be performed and upon request, a copy of the annual maintenance report must
be provided to Avista for two years after completion of the measure. A rebate is provided to the
customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers
have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The incentives for this
measure are S18 per ton or 50 percent of the installed cost, whichever is less.
Program Activity
There was no activity for this program in 2072, as the program was discontinued in 2011. There were no
ldaho participants in 2010.
t" Since net-to-Gross results on 20L2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-
to-gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
124 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
12s Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
12t lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
58 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 59 of 76
Program Changes
The Side Stream Filtration program ran the same in 2010 and 2011. The program was discontinued in
September of 2011 and customers had until December to submit paperuork for rebates.
Estimated Savings and Cost-effectiveness Components
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive premium efficiency motors program. The estimated savings
are calculated through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are
subject to annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 15 years for cost-effectiveness
purposes.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-'|3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 60 of 76
59 lPage
NONRESIDENTIAL - PRESCRIPTIVE LIGHTING ELECTRIC
20L2 20Lt 2010
Pa rticipants ( rebates)t,2L3 282 429
Energy Savings (kwh)L0,922,065 3,2L9,736 4,520,538
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive -75,2L3 -20,2L0 -26,809
Non-enersv Benefits 5168,279 S61,346 $qg,sqz
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio L.42 2.Os 3.07
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 2.08 4.06 6.19
Participant B/C ratio 2.58 3.83 3.34
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.91 0.90 L.37
Net-to-eross factor 67.4%67.40/o"'87.o%',
Discount Rate 7.O1o/o 6.800/o 6.80%
Non-l ncentive Expenses"'s488,468 S71,380 s131,10s
lncentive Expenses s3,056,199 s329,636 s53o,oo4
Program Description
This program is intended to prompt commercial electric customers to increase the energy efficiency of
their lighting equipment through direct financial incentives. lt indirectly supports the infrastructure and
inventory necessary to ensure that the installation of high-efficiency equipment is a viable option for the
customer.
There is significant opportunity for lighting improvements in commercial facilities. Avista has been
offering site specific incentives for qualified lighting projects for many years. ln an effort to streamline
the process and make it easier for customers and vendors to participate in the program we developed a
prescriptive approach, which began in 2004. This program provides for many common retrofits to
receive a pre-determined incentive amount. lncentive amounts were calculated using a baseline
average for existing wattages and replacement wattages. Energy savings claimed are calculated based
on actual customer run times using the averages as calculated for incentive amounts.
Below is the Measure list:
Measure lncentive
Exterior
70-90 watt HID Fixture to 10-20 watt approved LEIJ $75.00
100 watt HID Fixture to 20-25 watt lnduction Fluorescent Fixture $100.00
150-175 waft HID Fixture to 20-30 watt aoDroved LED Wall Pack Fixture s175.00
175 watt HID Fixture to 40 watt lnduction Fluorescent Fixture $150.00
250 watt HID Fixture to 50-60 watt LED Fixture $200.00
250 watt HID Fixture lo 75-85 watl LED Fixture s175.00
400 watt HID Fixture to125 watt aDDroved LED s275.00
400 watt HID Fixture to 250 watt Diqital HID $175.00
750 watt HID Fixture lo 21O-24O watt aooroved LED s350"oo
750 watt HID Fixture to 320-400 watt dioital HID s300.00
1000 watt HID Fixture to 400-470 watt approved LED $475.00
127 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's2OtL Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,7OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
128 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
'2e lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
60 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 61 of76
'1000 watt HID Fixture to 450- 575 watt Diqital HID Fixture $400.00
20-30 wati lncandesceni sion liohtino to LED or Low-Wattaoe Eouivalent s10.00
20-60 watt lncandescent sion liohtino to Cold Gathode $10.00
lnterior
250 watt HID Fixture to 4-Lamp T8 Fixture HO or 2-Lamp TSHO S-foot Fixture $55.00
250 watt HID Fixture to 4-Lamp T8 Fixture HO or 2-Lamp TSHO s-foot Fixture with OC Sensor s90.00
400 waft HID Fixture to 4-LamD T5 Hioh-OutDut Fixture s110.00
400 waft HID Fixture to 4-Lamo T5 Hiqh-OutDut Fixture with OC Sensor $150.00
400 watt HID Fixture to 6-Lamp IE Hiqh Penormance Fmure (4-l-oot Lamps)$'t00.00
400 watl HID Fixlure to 6-LamD TB Hioh Performance Fixture (4-Foot Lamos) with OC Sensol s140.00
400 watt HID Fixture to 8-LamD TB Hiqh Performance FDilure (4-Foot LamDs $120.00
400 watt HID Fixture to 6-LamD TE Hiqh Pefiormance Fixure (4-Foot Lamps) with OG Sensor $155.00
Over 100 Watt to 200 uatt lncandescent to Compact Fluorescent Lamp or Fixture (40-55 watt)s30.00
Over 200 waft lncandescent to Comoact Fluorescent LamD or Fixture (55-65 waft)s40.00
60 watt or oreater lncandescent to Dimmable ComDact Fluorescent. LED or Cold Cathode'*$10.00
100 watt or oreater incandescent llood to Ceramic Metal Halide (25 watt)$20.00
150 watt or qreater incandescent to New Linear Hiqh Performance T8 Fluorescent or LED Fixture $40.00
90 watl or oreater incandescent to 1 5 watt or less LED s3s.00
120 watt or oreater incandescent to 30 watt or less LED $45.00
lncandescent exit sion to new LED exit sions $20.00
Fixture with no occupancv sensor to over 170 watts on occupancy sensor $30.00
Activity
Portfolio acquisition and cost-effectiveness projections are closely related. The screening of
measures and programs to exclude those that are not anticipated to be cost-effective on a net TRC
basis (absent reasonable exceptions) clearly have an influence upon acquisition. Shifting cost-
effectiveness is most frequently the result of changing technologies, the cost of those technologies,
avoided costs, measure life and energy savings.
TRC cost-effectiveness results in the most recent business plan for the overall Prescriptive
Commercial Lighting lncentive Program:
Program Changes
ln December 2012, the T12 to T8 lighting conversion program ended. The non-T12 Prescriptive
Commercial Lighting incentives offerings for both Exterior and lnterior energy efficient lighting retrofits
have been changed and expanded. To describe the numerous program changes, the T12 Prescriptive
Commercial Lighting lncentives announcements for 2012 and 2013 have been included on the following
pages.
Estimated Savings and Cost-effectiveness Components
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive lighting program. The estimated savings are calculated
through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are subject to
annual evaluation. Non-energy benefits are specific to the project and are provided by the various
customers where applicable. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 12 years for cost-effectiveness
purposes.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 62 ot 76
Meosure pockoge Overoll portfolio gross sub-
TRC w/o NIUC
Overoll portfolio gross sub-
TRCw NIUC
Overall portfolio net sub-TRC
w NIUC
PSC-tighting 5.33 4.19 4.06
61 lPage
G OM M ER C IAL 1I G HTI ]I G I ]I C E ]IITIIIES P RO G RATI Ail 1{ O U ]T CE ME ]'IT
Act Nowl Bcginning Jrnurry l.?Ul2,lot a limitd tmr, thrn will b.
! ]IGREASED I ]I GETIIYES FOR IOST N2 FlU ORESGEilT G O]II'ERSIOTS
Avllta k pbasd b otlbr lrtcsndrros lor on€igy oticl3nt llohtog upgndgt to our valued oomrnemlal curfumera.
lncantvs forT12 and ofier eneroy sfildoflt llohtno rofioitt ant undeqolq dungps.Ilib now have trvo Commerdal
Lhhtru lrlosillvoAor€ernsnt hms (Erlclosod,:
. T12 Fluorgr€rrtconvorllms. lntedor end ExErlor for NonTl2 Ughtlng Cm\rertlons
Pt€so mE th€ llohtm prcoram change llrted beloru
Addton 1000 rYett Hlt)'O(H75 rEtt Dlgltel HID $500 Exbrlo?Rffilt
AililflqT (X! rvat HID 2E0 wat Dlottal HID s200 ExtBdor Rsfoflt
Addton 260wEtt HID TffiwrnLEDI st75 Exbrlor Rebollt
Ad.lttlon 2EOwEn HlD E(H)wanLEDI $200 Exbrlo? Rffdlt
Arldton 175nstr HID AF26wattLED}$r75 ExbdorRsdlt
A.ldton 7G€Onat HID lO-15 wstt LED*$75 ExbilorRffollt
Addtlon 175wat HID .Owatt lndrEtbn $50 ExbrlorRfrollt
Alltlon rcowrr HID 2(F25wef hducdon $r00 E(biorReuollt
DLconthll.d 1(x)0weuHlD tOO rYet lnductlon $0 Eflbcdve 2-lSl2s
Olrcoilfrll.d 'lO0 rEtHlD 2fl, wett lnductlon 30 Etlbctw 2-15-12x
Db@ntnu.d 100 wet or lesslncande$ont g, mft or le8s CFL $o E'ttscdve 2-15-l2n
15w qrtiloltr olSlb-So.clilCx]8'T12 HO&VHO
& orGrlorTl2 Othof \,brles Sse Avlrta Amunt EErrdvE
bsforo stardno omloct
Tatrpor.rylnontrYrlnctt*r T12la'or8'lfxturE TB (tl' o? 8'l tlxturoEplac€/rut,Dfit SoAgrEornent Endr 12-31_tztror
fmlpo?.rylnc.Dtva Increaa Tl2 l{'or8'lfxtur€
T6 (4' or 5'l flxtuE
mpl8e/rctrDilt S€eAg,pement Ends 1231-t2firr
ftmporrflnc.llilYa lncrlaaa
T12 14'or8'lfixtu,B L"EDquallflodl flxture Sc
AgrE€ment Ends 12€l-l2n*
'lhrrrqrircntourqrhdl&Fcrnooi{onntinrrdlhirglat I6.dpmilllpt!.ffihtmg&irnffcmaffirhinldilrsEr. Eocrirrd hcrJrrd b-&.il}ttlnr, isir prmtrilbrrqa ud rl}[Srp.tiaomdf hprogn
"' hrmcr irhrrain ot 8b€fi6cptqiom, Cen*b2cffi lrrotrurrrtrx Errr frirrrrf,gr- &onnn mr bourplrrd rrdr*nitd oAb Lf l2al{0t4 rp oclolo.TBin
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule I , Page 63 of 76
62 lPage
C O M M E RG IAL LI G HTI ]T G I N G EITTI UE S P RO G RAM AIII N O U N C E M E ilT
Avlsta ls pleasad to oflbr lncendws for onelly efrlchnt llghdrE upgrEdes b our Elued oomrnsrclal cusbmeG. On
December 31 , 2012, pr€scrlNw lnoentws forTl2 convElElms ended; hotwver, pleaca keep ln mlnd that Avlsta
ofiers I vadety of prsscrlpd\,g lncantves lor Non-Tlz LIghUng Etrofits. ln 2013, Avlsta has expanded fie lnbrtor
end exEdor ln€nuvs ofions wtlci ar€ now avalleble on tryo $paruts Prescrlpu\,B Commorcrlsl Lhhtlm lrlc€fltlve
A0reement Foms l€ncl6€d):e Commerclal Lhhtm lncentlvEAOreemeot- lnterlor Llgtillng Program
. @mmerclel Llghtm lncsntlrreAoroom€ot- Exterlor uohilng Program
Ple8se noto ths llghtng gogram changer lBEd belolv. ln ord€r b qualfy for tfi€ old lnc€ndve lsvBl $,horc lncondy€s
haw docr€ssed, submlt a Commerclal Ughtng lncsntv€ - lntorlor end Exbrlor appllcetan byApdl 30, 2013. tl€w
m€a8urse or lncreassd lnc€nthr€s ars e{lectlv€ February l, 2013.
DsnrrdlncantYa L.vol 1000 wet HID tto05r6tvEtt Dloltal
HID s600 $400 ExErlo.
Mdltlon 1000 wett HID .OG470 wefi LEDi N/A $475 Exterlor
Addltlon 760watr HID 320400watt Dlgltal
HlD N/A $300 Exterlor
Addltlon 76Owat HID 21G2{O rmtt LED*N/A ssEO Exterlor
D.ctl.rdlncrnilvr Lrvol t 00watt HID 250 watt Dlgltal HID $200 sl50 Ext€rlor
Addltlon 4O0watt HID 126 watt LED*N/A $275 ExtBrlor
Modlfld Ellglblllty |5O-l7Ewafr HID 2O-3{, wafi LED+
\'I''sllPacI N/A $175 Exterlor
Modllld Ellolbllltv 70-90 wEtl HID 1G2O wat LEDT iI/A $-,5 ExtBrlor
lncrrrld
IncmtYr Lrv.l 400w8fi HID 4lampTS $loE $110 lnterlor
lncnrrd
lncen0ve Lryd 'mOwatt HID 8 lamp Hlghfrrtormano6Tgt*t100 3120 lrilerlor
Modlfld Ellglblllty lnGrlor HID Hlgh Pertomance*
TB now reoulrcd N/A Vades lnterlor
Vrdod lnontl$c
Lcvol lntedor HID
I5 or Hlghhrrormencsr*TB wlth
OccuDancy Sensor
N/A $H6 lntertor
llEmardlmrntve Lcvcl otter 100-2ll0wafr
lncandosoent rl&55 rEtt CFL/FlxturB sl5 sro lnterlor
lncnerd!rcentvr Level
Over 200 wett
lncand€rcent 6646 rEtt CFl/Flxture $25 s40 Intorlor
Decnardlmentve Lcvcl
lql wett or over
lncendescsnt
25 wat Csramlc Metal
Hellde $30 s20 IntBrlor
lmrrrdlnc.n0vi LoY.l
90 YEt orover
lncandssoent
20 wat or l6s LED*
Lamp or Flxhrr€sa4 $35 !nterlor
lncrtard
lncentvo Lrvrl 120 or ovBr tffinflxturs 30 wat or less LEDI
Flxturc $34 s45 lnErlor
Dcctla3adlncandv. Laval
lncandescont ExltSlgn New LED Extt Slgn $25 t20 InErlor
Modltl.d Ellolbilty No Occupancy
Sensor
@er 170 watts on
Occupancy Sensor N/A $30 lntsrlor
r I ir r rrqdrrmr* t rr qrIfird lfr. For tmr iilonnrim rd lhip of qr.Ifi.d po&rrr go rt rw.Iglriigd.rirnLhomc rwdrhnlhl*r.org" ffi ftrfrmrorrtrlr rw rqrirrd. fu nrqr inbnr*mqrqdinrd eo*nt pr m*slonr
"'loordrroqlfifuhsold itn rif,lmli, pblrAnitrOorrrrirl ligldng lE dy.-lra trrdEfiir+eficthn bvAedlS,2O|3,"'llrr in-r,iF.trbrfrc f,*nryy 1,ffi,
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 64 of 76
53 lPage
2012 2011,2010
Particioants (rebates)0 4 8
Enersv Savines (kwh)n/a 534.358 208.668
Energv Savings (Therms) - interactive nla nla n/a
Non-enersv Benefits nla sL,L09,728 s7s0.238
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla L4.47 13.65
Prosram Administrator Cost B/C ratio nla 2.92 3.85
Participant B/C ratio nla 49.72 24.O0
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio nla 0.67 0.87
Net-to-sross factor 67.40/o 67.4%87.OYo'
Discount Rate 7.OLYo 6.80%6.80%
Non-lncentive Expenses"'nla Sr+,sgs 53,2q0
lncentive Expenses nla s47,8s0 s208.668
NONRESIDENTIAT -LED TRAFFIC SIGNALS ELECTRIC
Program Description
Rebates are available for the replacement of incandescent traffic signals with new LED signals.
lncentives are paid for pedestrian signals, red, yellow and green traffic signals and traffic arrows. This
program is available to traffic signal owners where the signal is operated with Avista electricity. A
rebate is provided to the customer after proof of purchase and other appropriate documentation has
been provided. Customers have 90 days from installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista
rebate.
The measures and incentives are listed below:
LED Pedestrian 9 inch Signal
LED Pedestrian 12 inch Signal
535 Each
S45 Each
LED Traffic Signal 8 inch Green Signal S35 Each
LED Traffic Signal 8 inch Red Signal S25 Each
LED Traffic Signal 8 inch Yellow Signal StO gach
LED Traffic Signal 12 inch Green Signal S55 Each
LED Traffic Signal 12 inch Red Signal S30 Each
LED Traffic Signal 12 inch Yellow Signal S10 Each
LED Traffic Arrows 8 inch Green Arrow StO each
L LED Traffic Arrows 8 inch Red Arrow $ZS fach
ED Traffic Arrows 8 inch Yellow Arrow $t0 fach
LED Traffic Arrows 12 inch Green Arrow S30 Each
"o Since net-to-Gross results on 2012 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-
to-gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
131 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista'sZOLL Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,2OL2as
prepared by Cadmus.
132 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
133 lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
54 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 65 of 76
LED Traffic Arrows 12 inch Red Arrow S30 Each
LED Traffic Arrows 12 inch Yellow ArrowS30 Each
Program Activity
This program was discontinued in 2011.
Program Changes
The LED Traffic Signal program ran the same in 2010 and 2011. The program was discontinued in
September of 2011 and customers had until December to submit papenrork for rebates.
Esti mated Savings a nd Cost-effectiveness Com ponents
No UES exists for the electric prescriptive LED traffic signals program. The estimated savings are
calculated through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are
subject to annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 8 years for cost-effectiveness
purposes.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AW-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 66 of 76
65 lPage
NONRESIDENTIAL - PRESCRIPTIVE HVAC NATURAL GAS
2012 20Lt 2010
Participants (rebates)24 72 nla
Energy Savings (kwh)- interactive nla nla n/a
Energy Savings (Therms)L2,8LO 4,726 nla
Non-energv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 1.17 2.07 nla
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 1.68 3.94 nla
Particioant B/C ratio 5.32 3.97 nla
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.50 0.86 n/a
Net-to-eross factor 67.4o/o 67.4o/o'"'87.0o/o'"o
Discount Rate 5.37%4.17o/o 417%
Non-l ncentive ExDenses'"'523,372 S3,695 nla
lncentive Exoenses s16,615 56,246 nla
Program Description
Rebates are available for the installation of qualifying new equipment in commercial facilities with retail
natural gas service provided by Avista. A rebate is provided to the customer after proof of purchase
and other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers have 90 days from installation of
the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The following are the measures that were eligible for
natural gas rebates in 2072 in this category. Any differences from the 2OL2 program offering will be
addressed by year later in this document.
Heating System lncentive per lnput kBtu
90o/o-94.9% AFUE NG Single Stage Furnace <225 kBtu/hr Sg.ZS
95% AFUE or greater NG Single Stage Furnace <225 kBtu/hr 54.25
9O%-94.9%AFUE or greater NG Multi Stage Furnace <225 kBtu/hr 54.25
95% AFUE or greater NG Multi Stage Furnace <225 kBtu/hr 55.25
85%-89.9% AFUE NG Boiler <300 kBtu/hr 56.00
90% AFUE or greater NG Boiler <300 kBtu/hr 5l.ZS
Program Activity
All rebates related to natural gas were discontinued in November 2OL2. The Company's integrated
resource plan for natural gas was evaluated in 2012 and identified a significant drop in avoided costs. As
a result, naturalgas rebate programs would not pass the cost effectiveness criteria. The Company filed a
request to the Commission to "discontinue" natural gas rebate programs temporarily. ln the event
'* Since net-to-Gross results on 2OL2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
13s Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
135 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
"' lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
66 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 67 of76
natural gas avoided costs start to rise, these programs will be re-evaluated cost effectiveness. This filing
was approved and natural gas rebates were no longer available as of November L,2072.
Other 2012 activities included vendor meetings with vendors from a variety of sectors (HVAC, insulation,
builders) to educate about Avista programs and protocols. ln addition, mailings were sent to vendors
and past participants to inform them of program changes.
Program Changes
The Commercial Natural Gas HVAC Program is on-going and changes are made on an as needed basis.
This program was rolled out in January of 2OLL.
Listed below are the notable differences in the measures offered and the rebates available in those prior
program years.
20L2
A90% or greater Thermal Efficiency NG Unit Heater offered at 55.00 per kBtu was offered as a market
transformation measure when the program was first rolled out and removed from the program in March
of 2OL2.
95% AFUE or greater NG Multi Stage Furnace <225 kBtu/hr offered at 55.25 per kBtu was added to the
program in April of 20L2.
20LL
A90% or greater Thermal Efficiency NG Unit Heater offered at 55.00 per kBtu was offered as a market
transformation measure when the program was first rolled out.
ln July of 2OLL the incentives for natural gas boilers were reevaluated and increased due to incremental
cost changes. We had processed one rebate at the old rate and we refigured that rebate at the new rate
and sent the customer the difference. The original incentives were:
85o/o-89.9% AFUE NG Boiler <300 kBtu/hr
90% AFUE or greater NG Boiler <300 kBtu/hr
s1.2s
S1.7s
Esti mated Savi ngs a nd Cost-effectiveness Com ponents
No UES exists for the natural gas prescriptive HVAC program. The estimated savings are calculated
through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are subject to
annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 16 years for cost-effectiveness purposes.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-'!3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 68 of 76
6TlPage
20L2 20Lt 2010
Pa rticipants ( rebates)nla n/a L
Energy Savings (kWh) - interactive nla nla nla
Energy Savings (Therms)nla n/a 42,088
Non-energv Benefits nla nla nla
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio nla nla 5.72
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio nla nla 5.82
Particioant B/C ratio nla nla 386.59
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio nla nla 0.72
Net-to-eross factor 67.4%67.4%87.l%o'""
Discount Rate 5.37%4.t70/o 4.L7%
Non-lncentive Exoenses nla nla s17,752
lncentive Exoenses n/a nla s5.120
NONRESIDENTIAT - PRESCRIPTIVE STEAM TRAP REPLACEMENTS NATURAL GAS
Program Description
Avista offered incentives for repair or replacement of failed steam traps. Steam systems with faulty
steam traps can waste significant amounts of energy and maintenance on steam traps is often ignored.
The steam trap incentive program is intended to increase awareness and incentivize customers and
vendors to take action that previously had not been taken. Where steam traps are to be replaced, only
new working valve traps are eligible and traps must have a strainer. A minimum of 95 percent of the
steam generation must be provided by Avista retail natural gas. A rebate is provided to the customer
after proof of purchase and other appropriate documentation has been provided. Customers have 90
days from installation of the equipment to apply for an Avista rebate. The incentives for this measure
are below:
Pipe Size %inch
Pipe Size 3/4 inch
Pipe Size 1 inch
Pipe Size L% inch
Pipe Size t%inch
Pipe Size 2 inch
Stzo each
St+o Each
Stos rach
5200 Each
S2z0 rach
S3so rach
Program Activity
There was no activity for this program in 20t2, as the program was discontinued in 201L. ln addition,
there were no ldaho participants in 2011,
"t Since net-to-Gross results on 2OL2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
13e Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.
1m Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April L9,2Ott as
prepared by Cadmus.
1ot lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
SSlPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 69 of76
Program Changes
The Steam Trap Replacement program ran the same in 2010 and 2011. The program was discontinued in
September of 2011 and customers had until December to submit papenivork for rebates.
Esti mated Savings a nd Cost-effectiveness Co m ponents
No UES exists for the natural gas prescriptive HVAC program. The estimated savings are calculated
through the use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are subject to
annual evaluation. Avista uses an estimated useful life of 5 years for cost-effectiveness purposes.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 70 ol 76
69 lPage
NONRESIDENTIAL - SITE SPECIFIC ELECTRIC
20L2 2011.2010
Participants (rebates)t22 139 204
Energy Savings (kwh)5.860.004 5.208.9s3 6,968.310
Energy Savings (Therms) - interactive -53.134 -22.873 -13,865
Non-energv Benefits Sss,rsg s63,870 5160,472
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 1.85 1.42 1.88
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 4.O2 4.6t 6.86
Participant B/C ratio 1.91 1.58 1.15
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 1.19 1.05 1.58
Net-to-gross factor 833%83.3%74.2%
Discount Rate 7.O1o/o 6.800/o 6.80%
Non-l ncentive Exoenses'"'s327,40L Srza,sro Srso,zoo
lncentive Exoenses s880,266 Szrs,aro sL.026.974
Program Description
The site specific program is available to all non-residential retail electric customers. This is the most
comprehensive commercial/industrial program offerings and brings in the largest portion of energy
savings to the overall energy efficiency portfolio. Commercial customers receive technical assistance
and incentives in accordance with Schedule 90. The majority of site specific kilowatt hour savings are
comprised of appliances, compressed air, HVAC, industrial process, motors (non-prescriptive), shell
measures and custom lighting (non-prescriptive). The following is an outline of the 2012 program
activity. Any differences in previous program years will be addressed, by year, later in this document.
Program Activity
Measures not covered by prescriptive program offers are evaluated under the site specific program. ln
accordance with Schedule 90 measures are eligible for incentives that show an energy efficiency savings
of over a one year simple payback and under an eight year simple payback for lighting. Other measures
must demonstrate over a one year simple payback and under a 13 year simple payback for incentive
qualification.
The incentive is capped at fifty percent of the customer incremental cost of the efficiency investment.
Avista's Account Executives work with nonresidential customers to provide assistance in identifying
energy efficiency opportunities. Customers receive technical assistance in determining potential energy
and cost savings and potentially an incentive. The Avista Utilities website is also used to communicate
program requirements, incentives and provide forms. The Every Little Bit Campaign is a broad-based
'o' Since net-to-Gross results on 2012 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used the net-
to-gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
143 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2011 Demand-Side Management Programs dated June t2,2OL2 as
prepared by Cadmus.14 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
los lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
T0 lPage
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 71 ot76
approach about energy efficiency and may feature Avista's nonresidential customers with testimonials
or case studies as to how energy efficiency has benefitted their business.
Program Changes
2OLL
The Site Specific Program operated in the same manner as outlined in 2Ot2.ln March 2011 the
implementation of new incentive levels and simple pay-back criteria for electric efficiency measures
went into effect. ln November 2010, the Company filed with the Commission to reduce the incentive
level and the simple payback criteria for eligible projects. Prior to this filing, the Company's approach to
energy efficiency was to pursue all cost-effective kilowatt hours by offering financial incentives for most
energy saving measures with a simple financial payback of over one year and to use the most effective
"mechanism" to deliver energy efficiency services to customers. The revision to Schedule 90 incentive
levels would no longer incentivize electric efficiency measures with a simple payback period of greater
than 13 years. These projects may have longer periods of payback, and may not always be TRC cost-
effective. The incentive level guidelines filed by the Company in November 2010 with implementation
in March 2011 are still based upon the simple payback of the measure prior to the application of an
incentive, and standardized measure cost(s).
2077 - Measures Simple Pov-Back lncentive Level kents 'vear kWh sovinas)
Electric Efficiency 1 to under 2 years
2 to under 4 yeors
4 to under 6 years
6 to under 8 yeors
6 to under 13 yeors*
8 yeors ond over+
7 to under 2 yeors
2 to under 4 yeors
4 to under 6 years
6 to under 73 yeors
73 yeors ond Over
5o.oe
s0.12
s0.16
so.20
50.20
$o.oo
So.ot
So.os
so.os
so.o7
So.m
Fuel Efficiency
2010
The Site Specific Program operated in the same manner as outlined in 2011 with a notable exception.
lncentives for electric efficiency measures were at a higher level in 2010 than in 2011. Prior to this filing,
the Company's approach to energy efficiency was to pursue all cost-effective kilowatt hours by offering
financial incentives for most energy saving measures with a simple financial payback of over one year
and to use the most effective "mechanism" to deliver energy efficiency services to customers. The
revision to Schedule 90 incentive levels would no longer incentivize electric efficiency measures with a
simple payback period of greater than 13 years. These projects may have longer periods of payback, and
may not always be TRC cost-effective. The incentive level guidelines have always been based upon the
simple payback of the measure, prior to the application of an incentive, and standardized measure
cost(s). Below find the incentive level available for program year 2010:
2010 - Measures Simple Pov-Bock lncentive Level (cents '"'.st vear kWh sovinosl
Electric Efficiency 7 to under 2 yeors 50.08
2 to under 4 years 50.12
71 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 72 ot 76
FuelEfficiency
4 to under 6 yeors
6 to under 70 yeors
Over 70 yeors*
Over 70 yeors+
7 to under 2 yeors
2 to under 4 yeors
4 to under 5 yeors
Over 6 yeors
50.16
So.zo
$0.20
$0.12
$o.ot
$o.os
So.os
So.ot
Estimated Savings and Cost-effectiveness Components
No UES exists for the electric site-specific program. The estimated savings are calculated through the
use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are subject to annual evaluation.
Avista uses various estimated useful lives depending on end-use and technology for cost-effectiveness
purposes.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 73 ol 76
72lP age
NONRESIDENTIAL- SITE SPECIFIC NATURAL GAS
2012 20tL 2010
Particioants (rebates)24 53 L23
Energv Savinss (kwh) - interactive nla -L6.978 -2,589
Energy Savings (Therms)63,922 tLL,987 L32,907
Non-enersv Benefits nla 5.151 se1,899
Total Resource Cost B/C ratio 0.62 0.64 o.76
Program Administrator Cost B/C ratio 1.33 2.21 2.86
Participant B/C ratio 1.33 0.59 0.91
Rate lmpact Measure B/C ratio 0.s3 0.91 0.80
Net-to-sross factor 83.3%83.3o/o 87.Oo/o
Discount Rate 5.37%4.770/o 4.L7%
Non-l ncentive Expenses'*'5723,253 5234,994 Sttz,tzq
lncentive Expenses 5L43,7s7 5332,932 s342.335
Program Description
The site specific program is available to all non-residential retail natural gas customers. This is the most
comprehensive program in the commercial/industrial offers and brings in the largest portion of energy
savings to the overall energy efficiency portfolio. Commercial customers receive technical assistance
and incentives in accordance with Schedule 190. This approach allows a flexible response to any energy
efficiency project that has demonstrable therm savings within allowable simple payback requirements.
The majority of site specific therm savings are comprised of a variety of measures including but not
limited to: appliances, HVAC, industrial process, and insulation. The following is an outline of the 2012
program activity. Any differences in previous program years will be addressed by year later in this
document.
Program Activity
Measures not covered by prescriptive program offers are evaluated under the site specific program. ln
accordance with Schedule 190 measures are eligible for incentives that show an energy efficiency
savings of over a one year but may not exceed 13 year simple payback. The incentive is capped at fifty
percent of the customer incremental cost of the efficiency investment. Avista's Account Executives
work with commercial customers to provide assistance in identifying energy efficiency opportunities.
Customers receive technical assistance in determining potential energy and cost savings and potentially
an incentive if the project is greater than a 1 year but less than a 13 year simple payback. The Avista
Utilities website is also used to communicate program requirements, incentives and forms. The Every
Little Bit Campaign is a broad-based approach about energy efficiency and may feature Avista's
t* Since net-to-Gross results on 2OL2 programs were not available at the time of this report, Avista used net-to-
gross factors from the most recent net-to-gross study.
147 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's2OLL Demand-Side Management Programs dated June L2,20L2 as
prepared by Cadmus.14 Per Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista's 2010 Demand-Side Management Programs dated April 19, 2011 as
prepared by Cadmus.
'ot lncentives are directly charged while the non-incentive utility costs provided here are allocated based on
avoided costs since the utility charges and tracks expenditures at the segment level rather than program level.
T3 lPage
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 74 oI 76
commercial customers with testimonials or case studies as to how energy efficiency has benefitted their
business.
ln November,2OL2 all rebates related to natural gas buildings were discontinued. Avista's integrated
resource plan (lRP) for natural gas was evaluated in 2012 and identified a significant drop in avoided
costs. As a result, natural gas rebate programs would not pass the cost effectiveness criteria. The
Company filed a request to the Commission to "discontinue" natural gas rebate programs temporarily.
ln the event natural gas avoided costs start to rise, these programs will be re-evaluated cost
effectiveness. This filing was approved and natural gas rebates were no longer available as of November
L,2012.
Program Changes
20LL
The Site Specific Program operated in the same manner as outlined in 2012. ln March 2011the
implementation of new incentive levels and simple pay-back criteria for naturalgas efficiency
measures went into effect. ln November ZOLO, the Company filed with the Commission to
reduce the incentive level and the simple payback criteria for eligible projects. Prior to this
filing, the Company's approach to energy efficiency was to pursue all cost-effective therms by
offering financial incentives for most energy saving measures with a simple financial payback of
over one year and to use the most effective "mechanism" to deliver energy efficiency services
to customers. The revision to Schedule 190 incentive levels would no longer incentivize natural
gas efficiency measures with a simple payback period of greater than 13 years. These projects
may have longer periods of payback, and may not always be TRC cost-effective. The incentive
level guidelines filed by the Company in November 2OLO with implementation in March 2011
are still based upon the simple payback of the measure prior to the application of an incentive,
and standardized measure cost(s).
2077 - Meosures Simple Pov-Back lncentive Level (dollors ' * vear therm sovinasl
Notural Gas Efficiency 7 to under 2 years SZ.OO
2 to under 4 yeors 5Z.SO
4 to under 6 yeors 53.00
5 to under 73 years SS.SO
73 yeors ond over SO
2010
The Site Specific Program operated in the same manner as outlined in 2011with a notable
exception. lncentives for natural gas measures were at a higher level in 2010 than in 2011.
The revision to Schedule 190 incentive levels would no longer incentivize naturalgas efficiency
measures with a simple payback period of greater than t3 years. These projects may have
longer periods of payback, and may not always be TRC cost-effective. The incentive level
guidelines have always been based upon the simple payback of the measure, prior to the
application of an incentive, and standardized measure cost(s). Below find the incentive level
available for program year 2010:
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1 , Page 75 ol 76
74!Page
2070 - Measures Simple Pav-Bock lncentive Level Hollors ''''st veor therm sovinasl
NoturalGos Efficiency 7 to 2 yeors
2 to 4 yeors
4 to 6 yeors
Over 6 years
Sz.oo
Sz.so
5E.oo
Se.so
Estimated Savi ngs a nd Cost-effectiveness Co m ponents
No UES exists for the natural gas site specific program. The estimated savings are calculated through the
use of a prescriptive calculator. The estimated savings for this program are subject to annual evaluation.
Avista uses various estimated useful lives depending on end-use and technology for cost-effectiveness
purposes.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 1, Page 76 of76
T5 lPaee
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
MEMORANDUM
Lori Hermanson, Avista
Danielle Kolp and Hope Lobkowicz, Cadmus
2012 Process Evaluation Memorandum
August 2,2013
Cadmus' 2012 process evaluation activities for the Avista nonresidential portfolio included the following:
o A Best Prodice Comporotive Review (memo delivered in February 2013)
o ln-person interviews with program stakeholders
. Database and realization rate review
Because Cadmus is not developing a formal process evaluation report for Avista until 2014, this memo
presents the findings of the staff interviews and database and realization rate review conducted for the
2012 program year. Our objective is to provide key personnel at Avista with findings now to assist them
in improving program processes in real-time.
Key Findings
lnterview Findings: Large Project Review Challenges and Changes
ln August 2011, Avista instated a new internal system to independently review site-specific projects with
incentives greater than SSO,OOO. This review stemmed from a recommendation in the 2010 Moss Adams
process report, pursuant to the 2010 Washinglon Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) rate
case settlement terms. The objective of the independent review was to examine project evaluation
reports prior to entering into contract with the customer, to ensure that:
o All supporting documentation was in place,
o Savings calculations were reasonable and well supported, and
o The project complied with tariff rules.
720 5W Washington Streel
Suite 400
Portland, OR 972O5
Voice: 503.467.71OO
Fax: [phone]
An Employee-Owned Compony
ww.cadmusgroup.com
Corporate Headquarters:
IOO 5th Avenue, Suite IOO
Waltham, MA O245'l
Voice: 617.673.7000
Fa\:617 -673-7OO1
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-'|3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 1 ol 23
Redacted
Avista staff who participated in the review process experienced multiple challenges, which are discussed
in more detail below. By the end of 20L2, staff concluded that the review process was not functioning
efficiently, nor did it align with the intention of the Moss Adams report recommendation. Avista
suspended the review process on January L,2OL3. ln 2013, Avista intends to implement a new approach
for reviewing site-specific projects, with the goal of balancing customer service and expediency with a
sound review. ln June 2013, Avista demand-side management (DSM) staff were finalizing this new
approach.
Review Process Challenges ldentified by Avista
Cadmus interviewed five Avista DSM staff who were involved in the review process. During the
interviews, we discussed several core areas of concern with the process and determined that the
intended protocol was not being followed. The process dictated that the Planning Policy, and Analysis
(PPA) team independently review the energy savings and proposed incentive levels of all site-specific
projects with incentives greater than 550,000, to ensure these impacts were calculated reasonably. ln
2012, only one-third of projects that met the criterion were sent to PPA for review.
When Cadmus asked staff about the challenges with this review process, the following four main issues
surfaced:
L. Dffirentlocused ottention ocross teoms. One staff person reported that the key personnel
within the DSM department involved in the review had different focused attention, which in
some cases translated to varying objectives for reviewing and approving projects. This is a
problem across many organizations and is, by no means, limited to Avista. While
implementation teams are most concerned with customer satisfaction and speedy and efficient
delivery planning and evaluation teams are most concerned with compliance. At Avista, the
lmplementation team was focused heavily on the customer relationship, while PPA was focused
on ensuring compliance with the tariff, minimizing the risk of uncertainty associated with
claimed savings, and navigating relationships with regulatory bodies and stakeholders. This is
not to say that neither team was unconcerned with the other's objectives. While staff agreed
that their roles support the comprehensive functions and o// overarching goals of Avista's DSM
programs, specific daily priorities added to misunderstandings about the value of the review
and, in some cases, differing opinions on how and when to resolve issues.
Trunsryrency, Some staff who were heavily involved in Avista's site-specific projects reported
not understanding the purpose, actions, or outcomes of the review. Without program-
stakeholder buy-in at all levels of the process, successful implementation was challenging. One
particular concern was a lack of information regarding how long the review would take to
complete for each project; this made it difficult to communicate accurate information to
customers on the status oftheir projects and the expected timeline.
Time log ond tlme commitment. A common obstacle cited by all staff interviewed by Cadmus
was that the review process took too long to complete for each project. Often, the issues
identified during the review required further discussion to understand the assumptions behind
the savings estimation, new data or information requests from the customer, or new analysis,
2.
3.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 2 ot 23
Redacted
which caused delays. Another challenge was the volume of the projects and limited staff
resources. Having only one engineer dedicated to reviewing the large projects was problematic
and often caused bottlenecks.
4. Llnking revlew wlth concrete octions. The review process lacked a formal follow through
procedure for problems uncovered during the review. This caused frustration as, at times,
findings and recommendations were not implemented. lnterviews and documentation of the
review process indicated that the e)cent to which the issues were resolved varied. For enhanced
delivery of DSM services, there needs to be an agreement regarding the best path forward for
calculating savings.
lssues ldentified Through the large Project Review
One of the major findings of the review was the overall reliance on customer-supplied data and the
need for a reliable and replicable approach to source that data. Avista staffwere in agreement that
increasing the clarity and transparency about where engineering assumptions and inputs were coming
from was a needed improvement and a successful outcome of the review process.
Cadmus reviewed the communication logs for 22 projects that undenrvent the internal review. ln
addition to the above issue of reliance on customer-supplied data or assumptions (which was inaccurate
in some cases), the following issues were documented for these projects:
. lnteractive effects were accounted for incorrectly
. Projects had missing documentation, such as invoices
r Engineering errors resulted in incorrect claimed savings and incentive amounts (the significance
of these errors varied in size)
Planned Process lmprovements
ln 2013, Avista staff worked together to design a new system to address the challenges cited and issues
discovered with the 2012 review process. The staff is currently implementing a two-step review process
for all site-specific projects that entails a technical review by the engineering team and an administrative
review by program staff.
o Technlcol Revrew, Ensures that savings and incentive calculations in a project's Evoluotion
Report are well-supported, and calculated according to tariff terms and Dual Fuel lncentive
Calculator policy. The new system includes a checklist with questions that guide the review,
along with instructions and policy guidelines, The Technical Review will be completed before the
evaluation report is sent to the customer, which contains estimated energy savings and the
corresponding incentive level.
c Admlnlstrotlve Review: Ensures that minimum requirements are met before a contract is issued
with a customer and before an incentive is paid.
ln the new process, PPA conducts random spot-checks to QA,/QC projects, and ensures that the review
process is smooth and effective. A main distinction between the 2012 and 2013 process is that this
random spot-check is intended to happen after the project has entered contract, or, in some cases, after
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 3 ot 23
Redacted
the incentive has been paid. According to implementation staff, this will help overcome bottleneck
challenges.
Both checklists (the Technical Review and Administrative Review) will be formalized documents known
as Top Sheets, which will be attached to project documentation through the life ofthe project. Avista
intends to synchronize the Top Sheet information with Tracker, the engineering database, and with
SalesLogix, the customer information system that houses nonresidential rebate and incentive
information. ln June 2013, the lmplementation team began using Top Sheets for all projects.
2077-2072 Databdse dnd Redlization Rate Review
As part ofthe 2012 process evaluation, Cadmus reviewed Avista's 2012 nonresidential project database
and the 2011 and 2012 realization rates for the nonresidential portfolio. The documents that were part
ofeach effort and our associated research questions are listed in Table 1.
Database Review
Realization Rate
Review
2012 SalesLogix
Database Extract
2071 and2Ol2
lmpact Evaluation
Sample
Are data being tracked accurately and consistently?
Are contracts issued in accordance with Avista policy?
Do incentives comply with tariff rules for Washington and ldaho?
Why do some projects have a very low or very high realization rate?
Are there opportunities for Avista to improve the process of
calculating reported savings to improve the realization rates?
Table 1. Database and Realization Rate Review Activities
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 4 ot 23
Redacted
Database Review
Tariff Schedules 90 and 190 govern how Avista can spend funds from the Energy Efficiency Rider
Adjustment paid by Washington and ldaho ratepayers.l To assess compliance with these Tariff
Schedules, we examined two main indicators:
1. Project incentive amount: electric and natural gas project incentives should not exceed 50% of
the incremental cost of the project (pp. 3 of Schedule 90; pp. 2 of Schedule 190).
2. Project simple payback
a. For lighting measures, the simple payback period must be a minimum of one year and
should not exceed eightyears. (pp.2 ofSchedule 90)
b. For non-lighting electric and natural gas measures, the simple payback period must be a
minimum of one year and should not exceed 13 years. (pp. 2 of Schedule 90; pp. 2 of
Schedule 190)
The tariff rules make exceptions for the following programs or projects (pp. 3 of Schedule 90; pp. 2 of
Schedule 190):
o DSM programs delivered by community action agencies contracted by Avista to serve limited
income or vulnerable customer segments, including agency administrative fees and health and
human safety measures;
. Low-cost electric/natural gas efficiency measures with demonstrable energy savings (e.g.,
compact fluorescent lamps); and
. Programs or services supporting or enhancing local, regional, or national electric/natural gas
efficiency market transformation efforts. lln 2Ot2, Avista considered new construction fuel
conversions in multifamily building projects and T12 to T8 commercial lighting conversion
projects as market transformation efforts.)
Applicobility ol Toriff to Prescriptive Proiects
At the time of this memo, Avista's tariff was undergoing revisions and a new tariff was filed on June 26,
20L3.
Avista uses the tariff provisions to: 1) design prescriptive measure offerings and incentive amounts and
2) evaluate the eligibility of site-specific projects on a project-by-project basis to ensure compliance
before approving them. Cadmus does not believe the tariff language was clear enough on the topic of
compliance to conclude whether individual prescriptive projects should be subject to the simple payback
period and incentive cap restrictions at the time of rebate application approval. lnternally, Avista staff
also expressed disagreement on this matter.
' Schedule 90: Electric Energy Efficiency Programs, washingon. Available at:
htto://www.avistautilities.com/services/enersvoricinq/wa/elect/Documents/WA 090.odf; Schedule 190:
Natural Gas Energy Efficiency Programs, Washington. Available at:
htto://www.avistautilities.com/services/enerqvoricins/wa/Eas/Documents/WA 190.odf: and Schedule 90:
Electric Energy Efficiency Protrams, ldaho. Available at:
htto://www.avistautilities.com/services/enerqvoricinq/idlelect/Documents/lD 090.odf
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedufe 2, Page 5 ol 23
Redacted
For purposes ofthis review, Cadmus evaluated both prescriptive and site-specific projects against the
provisions of the tariff described above, to allow Avista to review the findings and incorporate them into
their planning. lt should be clear that by presenting the prescriptive findings below, Cadmus is simply
suggesting that better clarity is needed and not necessarily that these projects were out of compliance.
Avista's proposed tariff clarifies that moving forward, site-specific projects are subject to the incentive
cap and simple payback periods at the time of project approval, while these parameters will be used in
the planning process for prescriptive measure offerings and incentive amounts.
Slmple Pay&ack Flndlngs
The majority of projects were in compliance with simple payback rules. Cadmus found that all site-
specific projects met the 13-year and eight-year payback periods, with the exception of some legacy
projects that were initiated before the new tariff rules took effect on January L,zOtL.
Less than 10% of prescriptive projects exceeded tariffsimple payback periods. Table 2 summarizes our
findings.
Site-Specific Projects
Prescriptive Lighting
(includes market
transformation and T12
projectslt
Prescriptive Non-Lithtint
(excludes multifamily)
Total
4,438,942 kwh t3% s8ss,s3s
113.398 kwh 2%572,73r7,810therms 7%
4.552.:140 kwh 12%
--.-. s927,6667,810themE 7%320 8%
* Avista's database extract does not denote which projects involved T12-T8 lighting conversions.
Upon reviewing a sample of 10 prescriptive lighting projects that exceeded the eight-year simple
payback period, Avista found that five projects involved a T12 to T8 conversion and three projects
contained database errors that inflated the simple payback period. ln these cases, what should have
been entered as months were assumed to be years, and multiplied by 12.
The sample size for this manual review was not large enough to e)drapolate findings to the full
population. However, based on the review findings, it is probable that a large proportion of the projects
included in Table 2 involved T12 to T8 conversions and/or experienced database errors, thus
significantly lowering the impact on energy savings and incentive costs.
tgt6.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 6 of 23
Table 2. 2012 Projects Exceeding Simple Payback Periods
Redacted
Proied I nce ntive Findings
Slte Speclflc
The vast majority of site-specific projects had incentive costs that were compliant with the tariff rule not
to exceed 50% ofthe incremental project cost. lnitially, Cadmus found 74 site-specific projects (19%)
that exceeded this cap. Upon reviewing these projects, however, we found that nearly half experienced
a rounding error from Avista's Dual Fuel lncentive Calculator that put them over the 50% limit by just
S0.zS (see Figure 1). Avista staff reviewed the remaining projects to understand why they exceeded the
incentive cap, and found that the majority were incorrectly entered in Saleslogix. Avista reported that
these projects had been calculated and processed as prescriptive projects, but incorrectly entered into
the database as site-specific,
Figure 1. Range of lncentive Amounts Exceedlng 50% of lncremental Costs,2012 Slte-Speclflc Projects
60
-50!ao
Eroo820t10
0
."..c "-.."ulr""lu{"d
Prescrlptlve
Significantly more prescriptive projects (74%) exceeded the 50% cap. As noted above, this finding was
expected because Avista's program design and delivery strategy did not consider prescriptive payments
as being subject to the tariff rules, and the lighting market transformation effort exceeded 50% by
design. Table 3 outlines the incentive payment and energy savings impacts from projects that exceeded
the 50% incentive cap.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, PageT ot23
Redacted
Table 3. 2012 Prescriptive Projects Exceeding 50% lncentive Cap
Prescriptive Lighting
(includes market
transformation and T12
projects)t*
2,574 80% 26,747,96skwh 8t% 52,290,8r
Prescriptive Non-LiShting
(excludes multifamily) 349
Tot lPr$criptlw 2,923
D,968,669 !ilh 77't74% 16,684therms 14% s2'765A68
3.220.704 kwh50%16,684 therms
58%
5475,43774%
* Cost impact represents the ag8retate amount exceeding 50% of the incremental cost.ti Avista's database extract does not denote which projects involved T12-T8 lighting conversions.
Again, Avista manually reviewed 10 lighting projects that were over the 50% cap, and found that eight
were T12 to T8 conversion projects, considered market transformation. Based on these findings, it is
probable that a large proportion of the lighting projects listed in Table 3 involved T12 to T8 conversions,
which would greatly reduce the cost impacts and energy saving impacts of from lighting projects over
the 50% cap.
Doto Entry ond Dato Trocking
ln addition to assessing policy conformance, Cadmus reviewed the 2012 database for data accuracy and
completeness. We found that:
. 8 projects were recorded as paid before construction was completed (most of these were entry
errors)
c \2% of all projects were missing Construction Complete dates
. 44 projects lL% of all projects) were missing incremental cost data
. 18% ofsite-specific projects were missing contract date fields in SalesLogix
o 44% ol site-specific projects were missing post-verification dates (and it is Avista's policy to
conduct post-installation inspections of all site-specific projects)
Avista reviewed 20 prescriptive lighting projects to determine whether they were market-
transformation projects (as noted above). They also uncovered several data errors with these specific
projects. ln all 20 projects, at least one of the following issues was found:
o Simple payback periods were entered in the database in years instead of months,
r Simple payback periods were entered incorrectly (SalesLogix data fields were not consistent
with calculations),
o Prescriptive projects were entered as site-specific projects,
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 8 of 23
Redacted
o lnformation from invoices regarding quantity and type of light fixtures was not transferred to
prescriptive incentive forms and SalesLogix correctly,
o lneligible measures were rebated, and
o lncentives were calculated incorrectly.
Realization Rate Review
Cadmus' impact evaluation methodology consisted of validating the reported savings for a sample of
projects by conducting independent meterin8, simulation, or regression analysis and by visiting the
proiect sites to verify that equipment was installed and operating as intended. The result of our project-
level measurement and verification tasks is a verified, ot ex post, savings value for each project in the
sample. The ratio ofverified savings to reported savings is the ptoject's reolizotion rote. A realization
rate of 100% indicates that no adjustments were made to the reported savings value.
ln 2011, Cadmus' nonresidential impact evaluation sample consisted of 179 electric and gas projects.2 Of
those, the majority (n=112) required a saving adjustment by more than 10%. That is, 63% of projects
had realization rates of either 110% or greater, or 90% or lower, Specifically, just 35% of electric projects
and 42% of gas project realization rates ranged between 90% and 110%. This changed in 2OL2, when the
majority of projects (64 of 101)3 experienced realization rates between 90% and 110% (see Figures 4 and
5 below).
Cadmus analyzed how frequently the evaluation resulted in an upward or downward adjustment of
reported savings, by how much, and the reasons behind the discrepancy between reported and
evaluated savings. The purpose of this review is to provide Avista with information to assist in improving
the reliability ofthe reported savings in the future, thereby improving realization rates for the
nonresidential portfolio.
Direction, Frequency, ond Mognitude of Verilied Sovings Adjustments
Cadmus determined that when savinBs needed to be adjusted by more than 10%, they were more likely
to decrease than increase. ln other words, most reported savings for projects in this group were being
overestimated, and the verification process resulted in a downward adjustment. This was true for all
2011 projects, and for all 2012 electric projects. ln20L2, gas projects required more upward
adjustments.
2011 Prorects
Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of realization rates in increments for 2011 projects. ln 2011, 51
electric projects had a realization rate below 90% (42%), while 27 electric projects had a realization rate
This number reflects projects with gas savings and electric savings. We actually evaluated 157 unique projects,
some of which achieved dual-fuel savings. For the purpose of the realization rate review, we treated gas
savin8s separately from electric savings.
The full 2012 impact evaluation sample contained 109 projects. We excluded eight projects from our analysis
that still had measurement and verification activities occurrinB at the time of writing this report.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page I ol 23
Redacted
above 110% (23%). 6as projects exhibited a similar pattern, with 25 projects having a realization rate
below 90% (ru%) and eight having a realization rate above ILO%ll4%1,
Figure 2. Dlstrlbutlon of 2011 Reallzatlon Rat6 by lncrements for Electrlc and Gas Prolectsr
r0r 90 to 110%
Electric Projects (n=120)
Proportion of Reported
kwh
I Below 5096
tlor'tot2S%
I50to75% !75to9o%
r125%to 150% lOverlSO%
Gas Projects (n=59)
Proportion of Reported
Therms
'Note: Percentag$ may not match ebove tert exactv due to rounding
For electric projects, the relative proportion of reported kWh savings in each increment was relatively
consistent with the number of projects in that increment. However, for gas projectt the relative
proportion of reported therm savings in each increment dld not accurately represent the corresponding
number of projects. For example, while just 19% of gas projects experienced a realization rate of below
5096 (but more than 0%), these projects represented 47% of reported savings.
Dividin8 the projects by increments revealed that a large portion of the projects whh realization rates
below 9096 were in fact below 50%, and most of the projects with realization rates over 110% were
actually over 150%. This indicates that not only was the range of realization rates large, but a significant
portion of reported savings values were sufutortidlly dillercnlfiom verified savings, requiring an
adjustment of 50% or Sreater,
2012 Prolccts
ln 20L2, realization rates improved. Rates were less variable, and projects required smaller reported
savings adjustments than those in 2011. For example, 61% of electric projects and 57% of gas projects
had a realization rate between 90% and 110%, leaving only approximately one,third of projects that
required an adjustment over 10% (see Figure 3).
Ofthe 2012 elecric proiects that required an adjustment over 10%, most required a downward
adjustment (18 projects; 31%). This is consistent with 2011 results. Ofthose 2012 gas projects that
required an adjustment over 10%, the direction was upward (eight projects; 19%).
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AW-E-13 AVU-C-I 3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 1 0 of 23
Redacted
Flgure 3. Dlstribution of 2012 Realizatlon Rates by lncrements for Electric and Gas Projects
t0
I 90% to 110%
Electric Projects (n=59)
Proportion of Reported kwh
Gas Projects (n=42)
Proportion of Reported Therms
! Below 50%
110%to!25%
a50%to75% .75%to9()%
atzs%to150% !Over 150%
rilote: Percenta8es may not match above text exactly due to roundinS
Cotologing Proieds with High ond Low Reolizqtion Rotes
To understand more about the projects that had severe adjustment factors (very high or very low
realization rates), we conducted a desk review of the project files and engineering analyses for a sample
of projects from 2011 and 2012. Specifically, this sample entailed projects with electric savings that had
been adjusted by over 25% in either direction (a realization rate below 75% or above 125%).
The original sample size was 75 projects; 57 from 2011 and just 18 from 2012. Upon reviewing the 2011
project files, we found that seven projects did not have sufficient reported savings documentation to
accurately conclude the reason for the savings adjustment. Therefore, the final 2011 sample size was 5Q
leading to an overall sample size of 58.
Based on our review, Cadmus concluded that there were nine main reasons for the savings adjustments;
these are outlined in Table 4.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page'11 of 23
Redacted
Table 4. Reason Categories for Variable Realization Rates
1. Participant Operator Error
2. Calculation Error in Reported
SavinSs
3. ENERGY STAR' Appliances
Deemed Savings Update
4. Cadmus Metering Results vs.
Avista Simulation or Analysis
5. Cadmus Metering Results vs.
Avista Metering Results
6. Database Error
7. Cadmus Calculation
Methodology vs. Avista
Calculation Methodology
8. I naccurate Lithting Hours-of-Use
(HOU) Estimates
9. Equipment verification
Savings required adjustment due to customer actions, such as installing or
operating equipment incorrectly
Reported savings calculations or assumptions were incorrect
Cadmus used updated deemed savings values for ENERGY STAR clothes
washers, dishwashers, freezers, and refrigerators to verify savings,
requiring an adjustment from the reported values, which relied on older
deemed savings estimates
Cadmus used metering results to inform verified savings, while Avista used
other tools to generate reported savinSs estimates
Both Cadmus and Avista used metering results to inform savings values;
however, the companies' parameters or timing differed
Some values in the database extract were erroneous due to a database
error, not a human error, and savings needed adjustment to reflect the
accurate value
Cadmus and Avista used different methodologies to calculate savings (i.e.,
regression analysis versus simulation), creating different results
The reported savings for some lighting projects were based on incorrect
HOU assumptions
The on-site equipment parameters (size and efficiency) differed from the
assumptions used in the original savints estimate
ln 2011, the most frequent reasons for savings adjustments of 25% or greater were due to metering
results being over the original estimates formed using simulation or analysis (n=10) and calculation or
assumption errors in the reported savings values (n=10). Other top reasons included ENERGY STAR
deemed savings updates (n=9) and differences in Cadmus' and Avista's calculation methodology (n=8).
ln 2OL2, there were far fewer projects with adjustment factors of 25% or greater. The top reason
categories in 2012 stayed relatively consistent with those in 2011, excluding the ENERGY STAR deemed
savings updates.
Figure 4 illustrotes the number of projects in each ol the redson categories
outlined in Table 4, ocross both years, Appendix A
Table 8 catalogues the projects requiring a savings adjustment of 25% or greater.
Table 8, at the end of the memo, lists the specific projects included in the review and a description of
each project's specific savings adjustment.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 12ot23
Redacted
Figure 4. Number of Projects with Savings Adjustments of 25% or Greater by Category,2oll-20t2
.20L2
r 2011
ts8'0
E bo
on-4
E
z
2
:i-"':""'::"..'"-"":d-.P"
.a"'
' .o9{
*."""*
.o
""E'
d$
"'"-l' .o9
,."tt"
.L'
qQ
o
0t-
t'""-"
"dJ'a"""'
lmpod on Gross Sovings
While the majority of savings adjustments in 2011 resulted in decreased savings, certain reason
categories experienced realization rates higher than L}O%, on average. For example, three reason
categories (Cadmus Metering Results vs. Avista Simulation or Analysis, ENERGY STAR Appliances
Deemed Savings Update, and Equipment Verification) resulted in increased savings. ln otherwords, the
projects in these groups experienced realization rates higher than L@%, on average.
ln 2012, just one reason category (Cadmus Metering Results vs. Avista Simulation or Analysis) resulted in
increased savings. Projects in the other 2012 reason categories (Calculation Error in Reported Savings,
Cadmus Calculation Methodology vs. Avista Calculation Methodology, and Participant Operator Error)
resulted in decreased savings.
The aggregate kWh impact for each 2011 reason category is listed in Table 5. The aggregate kWh impact
for each 2012 reason category is listed in Table 6.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AW-E-13 AVU-G-I3
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 13 of 23
Redacted
N(A G(Y).F;N2,i EB
=l lrt€> o-E<t g
[! o; (E
Ho".;3e
;9oEzu)oo(Eo
xts
.JtEf
Y<!
< 8,3qgYEt!i:<{
"ioz
6
E x ** re *aNtsddOQ
r6dNOodqNOd66dNdO6C€N6d6nFNoNo@-o-dh€0600dilr@oF@o€..,6.!tf?
>R >e x * a xx x xa6NoQOOOOOFdcicid
ooo(,
ox
o
EoE
E
u't
G
':3
ooc
o
.gooooLJEooot
.:ito
.g
o
E';o
Eo
'Eo
Eg6!o
oCIod
o
vis!6F
ci
=a
U
@o{,NNo$9<oNFONN.ioiq'so
:-
>e x x xa }s 88.;ooNrH*oi:o
Eo
ceo6NN6Hc'n!6@Fd@40A'NtrNo0>F: N- oo'ui d ui o
6QOF@O6' a h f 3E'.E
.g6600HodoP+otFoHoc6r{oHFd-- 6- oo' .i N i.iSsNHr0CdHH$O-.t t3
dHNmNo--E6Ordoo@a=-NoNouloq;.idoo'drrr-;60@ooo-HOrH@dO 60
o € @ oN - *B#
o
ouo3,iB_:oEs sgB ,E fc= E
=E=OiLOl.=dE,'.E-<Ep € :*PE E;-Ht;E=' EpEHE i833:5e-r:55E EPH;itiEgtCEi,;
=33:8EEe33A,sPr
ei.eP
€EE3<&dbc
.=oo
9E,iEET
ETEPE,gg;G>Od
oilododNOONoJ
nlRor
60@drd€' o'o6
OHooOHoi ra6t
ao@otsNdiil@F
.i.i
oo
'oI
oB
E
E'oo(EEot
c\t (', o c.),0gt
-- -6€> oFfi:E $
4t <-l ",;fe=,;92-E
o,o(l,o
I XXdo6
:eo x 'x
oo06c+ooatot66d<oFd66'.6
od
h
drN,o+r4tsNN@@oido'N6N6d+o
x x x xxdtdOOa;a
EG
c.9
o3moNo6=NN606=odOOdA)di d o' irrls+MtsNFY+ n I ?H.
E'' od+@,oEtsN@OPH+ts6r6' oo' d F.' ;6@+FilNOm0-HO>
d6ooqqH6OON.YNONOFIE$ s R'ESEot{a-H d o jjo
6ohHo!!Ht
o
ooh8.9o;.e€ ;t 3i*E E ; s
=:boi:Ei?. s ! 5E:eE : E E.=Oh=O.riEE*aJ o- H5E8:€E -E i2t52t !xoii. .eESEEEEHET€6 > 6;: C 6 6 0-U<U'ZU6LF*
I'ooo1'ot
ooo(9
ox6
o
o
E
E
.:3
o'd
n
o
.g
oUoo(J
Eoood,s.=3Eo
.g
o
U
.E
o
E.9IEo
I'ceEotooo4
o
qiglt6F
Figure 5 illustrates 2011 projects in each reason category as a percentage ofthe total sample compared
to the percentage of each categories' net kwh impact. While the ENERGY STAR Appliances Deemed
Savings Update category contained nine projects (representing about 8% ofthe total sample), the net
difference in ex onte and ex posf savings was actually minimal: a gain of 1,151 kWh (see Table 5), less
than 0.07% of savings in the impact evaluation sample. The Cadmus Calculation Methodology vs. Avista
Calculation Methodology category had similarly minimal savings despite containing a relatively large
number of projects (eight). On the other hand, the Cadmus Metering Results vs. Avista Simulation or
Analysis and Participant Operator Error cate8ories represented 8% and3% of projects, respectively, but
the net differences in ex onte and ex post savings represented L3% and 7% of the total verified savings in
the impact sample, respectively.
ln 2072, the percentage of projects in each category was higher than the respective percentage of kwh
savings in each category (see Errorl Not a valld bookmark self-reference.). For example, the Cadmus
Metering Results vs. Avista Simulation or Analysis and the Cadmus Calculation Methodology vs. Avista
Calculation Methodology categories both represented 10% of all projects in the evaluation sample, but
their net differences in ex onte and ex post savings were relatively small, representing only 2% and 4% of
the total verified savings in the sample, respectively.
76 Exhibit No.3
Cose Nos. AVU-E-L3- AVU-G-13-
L. Hermonson, Avisto
Schedule 4
Redocted
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Orake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 16 ot 23
Figure 5. Relative Proportions of Projects and Savings lmpacts by Reason Category, 20U
I Metering vs. Simulation
ES Appliances Update
lnaccurate HOU
oatabase Error
! Calculation Error, Rprt'd Savingsr Diff. MethodologyI Participant Error
Diff. Metering Results
Net Difference as
% of Verified
Savings in Sample
% of Total Projects
in Sample
Redacted
Figure 6. Relative Proportions of Projects and Savings lmpacts by Reason CateBory 2012
I Meterint vs. Simulation I Calculation Error, Rprt'd Savings Diff. Methodology I Participant Error
Net Difference as % of Verified Savings in
Sample
% of Total Projects in Sample 10%
I
E
Con cl usi ons d nd Recom m enddtions
Based on the above findings, we offer the following conclusions and encourage Avista consider the
recommendations listed below to improve their internal processes.
large Project Review Process
Conclusion: Avista's 2011 Large Project Review process was not implemented successfully due to a
series of communication issues and the absence of a mechanism to address concerns about project
parameters and correct mistakes. ln the first halfof 2013, Avista has been designing a new process for
all site-specific projects. While this process is underway, we have several recommendations may assist
Avista with successful implementation and an effective process.
Recommendations:
. Elfedively communicate the new proied review process to oll key teom members, Many of the
issues identified through Avista staff interviews regarding the prior review process centered on
communication challenges. When implementing the new process, ensure that all stakeholders
have a clear understanding of the review goals and correct protocol.
. Ensure therc are cleor protocols in ploce lor oddressing issues identlffed durlng the review ond
the spot<heck, To ensure that Avista and its customers are benefiting from the time and
resources dedicated to this process, consider implementing some check-points and policies to
clarifo how and when to alter project savings and incentive levels if issues arise during the
review. This may include designating a senior-level point person to serve as the decision-maker
for questions or disagreements regarding a project or its calculation methodology. Consider
identifying methods to ensure that all issues are discussed and resolved before incentive
amounts are communicated to the customer.
. Estoblish o gool lor the number or percentage of projects that should undergo o rondom spot-
check. Avista's new process dictates that the PPA team will independently review a sample of
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 17 oI 23
Redacted
projects, in addition to the peer review process. We suggest establishing a clear metric for the
number or percentage of projects this sample will include, such as five projects or 10% of all
projects.
Estobllsh o reasonoble gool lor how long the revlew process should toke. A core challenge with
the prior review process was the time lag. Keeping in mind that any process aimed at improving
the quality and accurary of incentive payments and claimed savings will add time to existing
procedures, Avista should internally discuss the amount of delay that is reasonable. lt may be
beneficial to create objectives for how long various steps of the process should reasonably take.
For example, Avista could establish one goal to complete the first Top Sheet review within a
certain timeframe, then establish another goal to guide how long it should take to resolve any
issues, if identified.
Consider adoptlng o tlercd opproach to the review so thot lotger, hlgh+isk projeas recelve
more scrutlny before controcts ore lssued and incentives ore pld, Under the planned
approach, all site-specific projects will undergo peer review. Often, utilities employ a risk-
mitigation approach to ensure that the largest and most expensive projects receive the most
rigorous review before they are approved, Avista might explore adjusting their review process to
focus the most time and resources on larger projects. An example of this type of approach is
provided in Table 7.
Peer Review
Second Engineering Review
Third Engineering Review
PPA Review
Pre-lnstallation Visits
Random Audit (spot-check)
All projects
Projects above $50,000
Projects above S75,OOO
Projects above S1OO,Ofi)
Projects above $100,000, plus others as needed
5 projects or 10% of all projects
. Conslder sttuctuilng rondom spot-check, or "oudits," to occut ot vorlous tlmes oI the prccess.
The current review structure plans to have some projects receive independent review after the
project evaluation report is complete or after the project is paid, so that any mistakes can be
corrected for future projects. However, it may be beneficial to stagger projects so that a
random portion also receives independent audits before incentive information is communicated
to the customer.
Database and Realization Rate Review
Concluslon: The accuracy of Avista's claimed savings, measured by realization rates, improved
significantly from 2011 to 2012. Three of the four main reasons for large savings adjustments in 2012
are largely outside Avista's control. However, Avista can still improve the reliability of claimed savings
estimates falling into the reason category of Calculation Error in Reported Savings.
Exhibit No.2
Case Nos. AVU-E-13 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 18 oI 23
Table 7, Example of Tiered Approach to large Project Review
Redacted
Recommendatlon:
. Continue to move fonivard implementing the new review process to identify and resolve savings
calculation errors.
Conclusion: Most of the nonresidential projects were compliant with the 2012 tariff rules, but
disagreement among DSM staff on tariff interpretation makes it difficult to draw conclusions about
prescriptive projects. Avista has already begun updating the tariff to address this concern and create a
more coherent policy. There are several improvements Avista can make to data tracking activities to
clarifo policy compliance on a project-by-project basis and improve data collection overall.
Recommendatlons:
Clearly document legocy prolecb or morket tronslormotion Nolects ln SolesLogix. Avista's
tracking system specifies measure type, but lacks detailed information such as whetherthe
project involved a T12 to T8 lighting conversion. This makes it challenging to understand which
projects are considered market transformation. Further, legacy projects are not specified. To
streamline internal tracking, auditin& and evaluation, consider adding a field to denote which
projects are eligible for transition policy (legacy projects) and which projects are considered
market transformation, as well as any other project characteristics that warrant exception to
tariff rules under Avista's new policy.
Contlnue to lmprove doto entry ln Sdleslogtx to reduce mrssing or lncorrect fields ond enhonce
the com$ehensive dotoset.
Exhibit No. 2
Case Nos. AVU-E-I3 AVU-G-13
C. Drake, Avista
Schedule 2, Page 19 ot 23
Redacted
(\t(') (Ed)
esE:
E; ts
fiil8 $!"&4 <-: "c
=o;92A
3(Uo
h A A h h h b dc i c c L- c s t'd o o o o o o oo o o o o o o oGE oE o!E ESsEeEaEaSaEaEaEarEa!!6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 c.E c.E c.E e.E c.5 c.5 c.5 c.EE E E r- c- E E 8.9e.9 e.e e.e e,9 e.9 e.9 e.9 eo o o o o o a o:6E6Eqx616l:6?i646
U S E E E H U E#E;E.*E.#E€E.#E.#E.fiE.d d a o o o o ou&oEo E9GUGoEoGoc
sE I Eq,g g = * g St nseic"EEtt estsE"* s
E==="--:=cE="EEE E g EEEEEEE
+do@ododH@60ts6NONON@CNHOo@@oHeHNO@6O@o66@OO+@@@O606dmdNo606N
HdddHHdiHdHHddddHHddHdHdooooooooooooNNNdNNNNNNNN
x$n $ x $ H $ $ s 6 5H$n*
Ieee 5i5 3
ooooNNNN
TE:
Y<EI et< 83,S6A
9b3T<{
uio?
o
Ngsnn -ra s * r $ H
$.ss$ x+$ [ $ $ ; H s i $ g.
N66-oo
to
otq3333e3
E
.Eo
IGoli)]o'toGootgE8.9o6o=sG6O;Eo.=NEE€
9Ea9!u!- .qoOfoi'E oddoqioo
PF
'=go
o'6
ooE
o<3-o.t;t6
oocL@q€<i
6HNN66@Fd@@mot+6
EoooE(,u
N(') 60
:4gE
E; o6t
fixE $r-ot4t o ",iPo,
,;P2E
o)o(Eo
ooooooooon PZ66OOO6GGGE!!!!EE!!Ec6
o o f I f f :) I = f ) ae
=eEa 6 o 6 fl @E:E:E* H H H H H H H H H EEisisisi
sssgf;f; ; fi ; fr fr F fi ; ; aEE;E;E;E
EN
aaa@@@NN
a@a
N
N N il $ i$ * * 3$$ *B* il t $ il N
H S R g$ $ E. ft5
n !!o!lI. 3[X = H R R H Hx 1i,i9
HsH$$$$HH;eNo xxxooN*6@
I 33=
A E E E 9=bE t;€ Eo =-o € E Ernt ! !-EE E EP ..? ? ..-...? ? :fiFE H E g
- X c c E - A o 6 6 6 o 6 o 6 o 6 6 ><- tr = c c'E -*.E .A =* fi - fifi fi -6 -ai6ia'od -6 - E: E .q .q I 8t-i8 3 H a.Eaihg6Engagn9a"Ea.EtE; U U E.E$B=
='sEggEggeSEEEEEEESggESE$
f sfE
<60toon@ddoosooo6{666FNts6dFt@NOt@dnO6--6000@oooo6do6@oNNNFFNF€h6NN@OOO{Ooo6600660000000060
dddddddHHddHddHddHHddHdddiHddHddddHiddooooooooooooooooooo-----ilNdNNNNNNNNNNN
$e B]33
oE6!
Eo)ooEq)u
N(') (oC.,
:4gEE3;N
fisE $
I t-l ";3e
aPoEza(,oC'o
>>-ubba 3 3 aE Asg C € € €,; 6 ;,;,i vi E E E ET IgU U E P !q ici]cici-iqls q 9 9 I 1'1 ots-. : P P Eo uo @o uo uo @o gr.9 ts t t ts ts 6 E E 6 E E -PE trE EE CE cE CE CE U U U U U E ; ; X O A OE;E;E;E;E;E;E: : : :; i:?:3 :A 5 : =EgEEEg;gEgEgsE E E EE EEE F E E E
E H H $ H $s $ * $F $ss 5 6 $ $
tfi.$3$$
@NP-::rrqhoo6n $ ;' A'Fi fr'3 i-+@*tH
$ $ E A E f,P. E { Ht stqA q q frP E E H 3 ila ;'H ;"."'$Es il il s
E E s .e 6 6 b E Eb i .: - tE c o o o s E tr tr trtr 3qc<t .> .> E€ f E E E € EgEgIgEEgEEEE E E IhXoooE E o o 9 E roEg,.spEproEr"i E9 E E 8eu u buEuEsu .Eb;E.Eb.E.Eb.Eu4bu ! ! uii f gfsfgfi =69=ag=sg=s=ss'i"=5gf A ; +
6oo6+S 8-q $-ooodoNo
- >= = = -3 3== = = B 3
+ N N d o @ r o o r @ F @ oo d N <N 6 ts r F I O r O O H d F tsO @ O is q + { * @ H t 6 H o o o ds o @ o6 6 ts N r O I @ @ r @ @ d H6 N 6 do m m o o N o o o 6 0 6 0 No o 6 6
HHdHdddddddHdHHNNNddHHdHdddHdHdHddHHoooooooooooooooooodddNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
E'oootot
N(f' G(':,ifEE3;e
fi58 $5"o-4 <-l ",;3E
aP2E
g
(!o
b bo 6os' j g' J do o oo o o o o oE E EEsE$SE"5SE$,, ,: .: ,. EE E EEiEiEFEiE:isisisisisis EE g EEsESE!E3EE;E;EEE;E;E;E .iS E E*E.*E.#E.#E.*E.EEEEEEEEEEEE Eo o ouEUEUEUC9eZqZqZ6Z6ZqZUr &
sEHS$stn$$$$855
'Hts$'h*$u.$$$so
HFF.f.il.3Xn}*$nBq.eF.' 6- $ B S oo' E P i- 5 5 H d 9 E
*gEgE * * B c *;e;s F F*,*,fi=
3=====33-3===3=
oNts@@@o*No9@od@o66@6HOON9Otshdr666tsOHOrOONNF(O6@€O+O60060006Noomso6ooooooodo
NNNNNdNNNNNNNNNddHddddddddHdddoooooooooooooooNNNNNdNNNNNNNNN
EooGEot