Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180402Annual Report.pdfAEwsra - 13.o( Avista Corp. 1411 East Mission P.O.Box3727 Spokane. Washington 99220-0500 Telephone 509-489-0500 ToflFree 800-727-9170 March 30, 2018 Diane Hanian, Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission Statehouse Mail W. 472 Washington Street Boise,Idaho 83720 RE:Avista Utilities 2018 Annual Report Regarding Selected Research and Development Efficiency Projects Dear Ms. Hanian: Enclosed for filing with the Commission is an original andT copies of Avista Corporation's dba Avista Utilities ("Avista or the Company") Report on the Company's selected electric energy efficiency research and development (R&D) projects, implemented by the state of ldaho's four- year Universities. Please direct any questions regarding this report to Randy Gnaedinger at (509) 495-2047 or myself at 509-495-4975. Senior Manager, Regulatory Policy Avista Utilities 509-495-497s linda. gervai s@avistacom.com .': t\3.{ .=--.- &_it=%n ,-fi* f, fTl,,E., r CT,;): h, m \J/* I :rH - lll;EE o U): ff'l(J cnV Enclosure Aiwsra AVISTA UTILITIES SELECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EFFICENCY PROIECTS . IDAHO Annual Report March 30,2018 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report IVlarch 3O 20'18 THE FOLLOWING REPORT WAS PREPARED IN CONFORMANCE WITH IDAHO PUBLTC UTTLTTTES COMMTSSTON (IPUC) CASE NO. AVU-E.13.08 oRDER NO. 32918 March 30,2018 Page | 1 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Reportlrar.h ?n 2n1A ANNUAL REPORT SELECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EFFIGENGY PROJECTS IPUC CASE NO.32918 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SCOPE OF WORK 3 3A. lntroductionB. BackgroundII. KEY EVENTSA. Request for lnterest. B. Selection of Projects C. Description of Selected Projects D. Project Manager and Related Communications;................ E. Agreements F. Project Milestones...III. ACCOUNTINGA. Schedule 91 Available Funds B. Funds Authorized for R&D Projects in 201612017 C. Funds Expended and Remaining Balance IV. PROJECT BENEFITS..A. Residential Static VAR Compensator (RSVC) Year 3 C. CAES: Water/Energy Conservation Analysis.. D. IDL Energy Management Phase 2V. RESEARCHIN-PROGRESS....A. Summary of Research ln-Progress B. Other Relevant Activity LIST OF APPENDICES ,,4 ,.4 ,.4 5 5 7 ..8 ..8 10 10 10 10\t 12 t2 12 13 13 13 15 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H APPENDIX I APPENDIX J APPENDIX K APPENDIX L Two-Page Reports Request for lnterest Boise State University Agreement University of ldaho Agreements Final Report: RSVC Year 3 Final Report: Micro Grid Phase 2 Final Report: CAES Water Energy Conservation Final Report: IDL Energy Management Phase 2 lnterim Report: RSVC Year 4 lnterim Report: Energy Storage lnterim Report: IDL Temperature Efficiency lnterim Report: Aerogel Page | 2 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report March 30, 2018 I. SCOPE OF WORK A. lntroduction This report is prepared in conformance with ldaho Public Utilities Commission (IPUC) order No 32918. This includes key events during the reporting period and accounting for related expenditures. Avista Corporation, doing business as Avista Utilities (hereinafter Avista or Company), at 1411 East Mission Avenue, Spokane, Washington, is an energy company involved in the production, transmission and distribution of energy as well as other energy-related businesses. Avista Utilities is the operating division that provides electric service to more than 600,000 electric and natural gas customers. Their service territory covers 30,000 square miles in eastern Washington, northern ldaho and parts of southern and eastern Oregon, with a population of 1.5 million. Avista also provides retail electric service in Juneau, AK through a subsidiary called Alaska Electric Light and Power Company. - SEntVffirmfiofiY a Bocrri€ rnd tlltural G.r Q [atudGrs Page | 3 Avista Service Territory l(ettlo Falh O ONTANA$r SpokrneO othello o Pulman Clarkstori o \r-{ b Gnndc $v / I OREGON tDAt{o Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report March 30,2018 On August 30, 2013 Avista applied for an order authorizing it to accumulate and account for customer revenues that will provide funding for selected electric energy efficiency research and development (R&D) projects, proposed and implemented by the state of ldaho's four-year Universities. On October 31, 2013 Order No. 32918 was granted to Avista. Avista now recovers up to $300,000 per year of revenue to research from the Company's Schedule 91 Energy Efficiency Rider tariff. This program provides a stable base of research and development funding that allows research institutions to sustain quality research programs that benefit customers. lt is also consistent with ldaho Governor Butch Otter's ldaho Global Entrepreneurial Mission "iGem" initiative in which industry would provide R&D funding to supplement funding provided by the State of ldaho. B. Background ln the 1990s, with the prospect of electric deregulation, utilities reduced or eliminated budgets that would increase costs not included by third-party marketers for sales of power to end-users. Research and development was one of those costs. This has led to the utility industry having the lowest R&D share of net sales among all US industries. Research and development is defined as applied R&D that could yield benefits to customers in the next one to four years. ln 2010, Governor Otter announced ldaho would support university research as a policy initiative with some funding provided by the state and supplemental funding expected from other sources. This project provides additional funding to selected research. !I. KEY EVENTS A. Request for lnterest The request for interest for projects funded in 201612017 academic year was prepared and distributed to all three ldaho Universities on March 21,2016. A full copy of the request for lnterest is included in Appendix B. On April 21, 2016, Avista received 9 proposals from the University of ldaho and 1 proposal from Boise State University. Following is a list of the proposals received: Universitv of ldaho 1. Grid Defender Utility Pole lnstallation and Protection System2. Case Studies of lmpact LED Lighting Upgrades on Overall Energy Use to Better Structure Avista !ncentives 3. Developing Practical Energy Saving Recommendations for the North West lndustries and Assessing of Environmental Protection Page | 4 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report March 30,2018 4. Electric School Buses with Secondary Vehicle to Grid Energy Utilization 5. Downtown Spokane Micro Grid 6. CAES Water/Energy Conservation Analysis with Avista 7. Assessment of Potential Energy Savings Through Solar Roadways lnstallation on Ul Campus 8. Energy Trading System 9. Using Reduced-Order-Models for Simulation-Based Commissioning of Buildings Boise State Universitv 1. Operation and Control of Distributed Residential Static VAR Compensator (RSVC) Phase lV B. Selection of Projects Avista prepared an evaluation matrix for the 10 proposed projects. A team of individuals representing Distribution, Transmission Planning, Generation and Demand Side Management, co-filled out the matrix to rank each of the projects. The following factors in no particular order were considered in the ranking process. . Research Areas Already Being Done (EPRI, WSU, AVA) Com plemenURed undanUNew. PotentialValue to Customers kwh/K/V/$ (1-10). COz Emission Reduction (Y/N). Market Potential (1-10). Are Results Measurable (Y/N). Aligned with Avista Business Functions (Y/N). New or Novel (Y/N). Ranking (1 -10) C. Description of Selected Projects Following is a brief description of each of the four selected projects. Project teams compiled "Two Page Reports" which summarize and highlight project details. These Two Page Reports are included in Appendix A. Additional details are included in the final project reports in Appendix E, Appendix F, Appendix G, and Appendix H. RSVC Year 3: Operation and Control of Distributed Residentia Static VAR Compensators (RSVC) Phase lV Phase I of this project was funded in Year 1 and consisted of a study model of a Residential Static VAR Compensator (RSVC) for regulating residential voltages. Phase !l of this project was completed without funding assistance from Avista. This phase consisted of building an open loop control prototype of the RSVC device. Page | 5 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report March 30,2018 Phase lll of this project was funded in Year 2 and consisted of performing a time- series simulation over multiple months using a model developed in OpenDSS of downtown Spokane and a ruralfeeder near Lake Pend Oreille. The objectives of the research during Phase lV were to develop the framework and simulation platforms to allow for distributed control algorithm tests of the Residential Static VAR Compensator. The research included simulation of 1) voltage control, 2) power factor control, 3) multi-RSVC interaction, 4) RSCV interaction with voltage regulators, battery energy storage systems, photovoltaic generation, and pre- existing capacitor banks, 5) conservation by voltage reduction, and 6) RSVC simulation comparison to field measurement data. Micro Grid Phase 2: Downtown Spokane Micro-qrid The scope of this research was to perform studies on how to establish a microgrid under emergency conditions. The goal was to create a practical plan to investigate and employ a master controller to establish the microgrid and to manage the inclusion of generation, energy storage, and critical loads in a set of anticipated scenarios. Advantage to the ratepayers was measured through maintaining critical loads for public safety and system reliabili$ and security and improved recovery from emergency situations. A unified model of the microgrid was developed in Powerworld simulation software. This model was then used to validate a model of the system built in RSCAD. Once this was completed the control systems for load shedding and battery control were added. A study was then performed to ensure the control systems behaved as expected. This is demonstrated in the analysis and key results section below. ln addition, a study was performed to determine the feasibility of adding battery storage, followed by determination of optimal locations, and rating of the potential battery storage systems. The microgrid has a very good potential to improve the resilience of the system since it is predominantly supplied by hydroelectric generation that is very close to the critical loads. CAES: Water/Enerov Conservation Analvsis with Avista The University of ldaho and ldaho National Laboratory through their partnership with the Center for Advanced Energy Studies (CAES) worked collaboratively with one carefully selected member of the Northwest Food Processors Association (Litehouse Dressing in Sandpoint, lD) to do a combination of process modeling and system-dynamic modeling of their operation. The goal was to identify and create plans for implementation of new technologies that would significantly reduce their energy and water consumption. Because of the nature of the energy use in food processing, new technologies have the potential to substantially reduce the energy and water use by some customers. Five models were developed to simulate the Litehouse process energy balance. Models 1 and 2 were run using HYSYS, and they represent the two refrigeration Page | 6 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report March 30,2018 cycles responsible for maintaining the walk-in refrigerator temperature at 38'F. Models 3 and 4 were run using HYSYS, and they were used to help determine the current cooling load on the floorplan and the energy load on the individual systems. Model 5 was a mathematical model run using Python, and it was used to help determine the approximate size of refrigeration equipment needed to maintain a room at a specified temperature. IDL Enerqy Manaqement Phase 2: Usinq Reduced-Order-Models for Simulation- Based Commissionino of Buildinos Phase 1of this project was funded in Year 1 and completed by the University of ldaho lntegrated Design Lab (lDL). During Phase 1, the group performed a virtual control commissioning for part of the HVAC system at a building on the University of ldaho campus. A detailed energy model was combined with communication pathways to the building control hardware. The research on the economizer setting at the College of Business and Economics (COBE) building revealed areas for optimization. The continuation of this research in Phase 2 included moving this technology forward in two important ways: 1) by performing a physical demonstration at the site, and 2) by simplifying the modeling process. A physical implementation of virtual commissioning would greatly add to the commercial case for this technology. Additionally, the research aimed to simplify the fully detailed building models to reduced-order thermal models that could be used to tune building controls. The research focused again on the Albertson's College of Business and Economics building (COBE) at the University of ldaho Moscow Campus. The reduced order model was composed of sets of differential equations with system parameters which describe the dynamic nature of heat transfer though a building. These parameters were determined through software optimization in order for the model to best predict the zone temperature of the building when compared to the zone temperature as predicted by EnergyPlus. The reduced order model was coupled with an HVAC model to predict the total annual energy consumption of the building which was then used to determined potential energy savings measures. lt was found that the COBE building lacked thermostat setbacks during periods of unoccupancy, and the ROM model was used to predict the energy savings associated with updating the controller. lt was found that approximately 104,000 kWh of potential energy savings could be realized if the thermostat had properly programed temperature setbacks during times the building is unoccupied. D. Project Manager and Related Communications; Avista set out to find an independent third pafi project manager based in ldaho. On September 26, 2014 Avista entered into an agreement with T-O Engineers as this independent third party project manager. T-O Engineers is an ldaho company based in Boise, Idaho with offices in Boise, Meridian, Coeur d'Alene, and Nampa, ldaho, as well as Spokane, Washington. Page | 7 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report March 30.20't8 T-O is tasked with providing project management, organizational structure, milestone setup, milestone tracking, and incidental administrative services. The project manager for T-O Engineers is JR Norvell, PE. The deputy project managers are Natasha Jostad, PE, and Tyson Schlect, ElT. JR and Natasha are both based out of the Spokane office, and Tyson is based out of the Boise office. E. Agreements On Augusl25,2016 Avista entered into an agreement with Boise State University The full agreement is included as Appendix C. By July 18, 2016 Avista executed individual task orders which were assigned for each of the University of Idaho research projects selected, and those agreements are included in Appendix D. F. Project Milestones The following graphic identifies each project's specific tasks as well as the overall research and development schedule and milestones. Final reports from each Principle lnvestigatorwere submitted in the fall of 2017.|n addition to the written report, each research team presented their findings in person to Avista. IDL and the CAES group both presented their findings to Avista on August 15,2017, and the RSVC group and Microgrid group presented their findings on August 29,2017. Page | 8 Annual ReportAvista Research and Development Projects ,.r"n aO. rO.,, l. Prcject ltlanagament 2. Develop Follow{n Propo3al rTask 1: Project KickOff 3. Prepare Final Report I I Task 2: Oata Acquisition Task 3: RSVC Dynamic Simulation Task 4: Effect of RSVC on Existing Caps Task 5: RSVC sizo 8nd Voltago Ctil Alg. Task 6: HW Prototype Dev. Preliminary Testing Task 7: Oraft Report I I I I I I I III .rLTask 8: Final Report and Presentation Task 1: Mastercontroller lMain Oirective) Task 2: RTDS Model Task 3: Small Scale Example Model Task 4: Small Scale Example Model: Trip Breaker Task 5: Small Scale Exampls Model: Trip Broaker with Rel.y Task 6: lsland Detection Setting3 I Task 7: Load Shedding with VipoB .-T--- I I Task 8: Protection Settings Task l: Gather Basoline Data Task 2: Establish on Site Communication fask 3: Simplify Detailed Energy ltlodel Task 4: Analyze Effectiveness of Reduced Order Models F I I art fask 5: Develop Workflow for Practitione6 fask 1: Project Kickoff Task 2: Meet with Lighthouse Iask 3: Receive Requested Process lnformation I I fask 4: Provide Working Simulalion of Proce3a 1. Project Kickoff I FL I 2. Follow on Proposal to Avista 3. Final Report and Presentation to Avista 4. IPUC Oeliverablo3 Page | 9 Task Description 5sp/r6 ocqL6 Nd/16 De.l16 tanltT FebllT Ma.l17 Ap.l17 MaylLT !!nl17 tolltT k eJlT lDt CAES Water All Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report March 30,2018 III. ACCOUNTING A. Schedule 9'l Available Funds Effective November 1, 2013 Avista can fund up to $300,000 per year of R&D from revenue collected through Avista's Schedule 91, Energy Efficiency Rider Adjustment. At the end of each year, any monies not allocated toward payment on R&D projects roll over as available resources for the next year. A summary of the balance for Schedule 91 from the beginning of Order No. 32918 is shown in the table below. B. Funds Authorized for R&D Projects in 201612A17 Contracts lor 201612017 are as follows: C. Funds Expended and Remaining Balance Following is the final budget summary tor 201612017 FY R&D Projects. Academic Year New Funding Balance from Previous Year Total Funds Available Contracted Amount Actual Expenditures Balance 2014t2015 $300,000.00 $0.00 $300,000.00 $287,941.00 $243,467.32 $56,532.68 2015t2016 $300,000.00 $56,532.68 $356,532.68 $252,493.00 $235,809.03 $120,723.65 2016t2017 $300,000.00 $120,723.65 $420,723.65 $372,665.16 $358,641.82 $62,081.83 2017t2018 $300,000.00 $62,081.83 $362,081.83 $326,755.89 Agency Description Contract Amount Point of Contact Boise State University RSVC Phase 3 $ 98,901.00 Dr. Said Ahmed- Zaid University of ldaho Microgrid Phase 2 $ 86,179.61 Dr. Herbert L. Hess University of ldaho CAES Water Energy Conservation $ 93,354.55 Dr. Richard N Christensen University of ldaho IDL Energy Management Phase 2 $ 64,230.00 Elizabeth Cooper T-O Engineers Project Manager $ 30,000.00 James R. Norvell Total $ 372,665.16 Page | 10 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report lvlarch 3O 2OlR Description Contract Amount Total Expended Budget Remaininq RSVC Phase 3 $ 98,901.00 $ 95,934.99 $ 2,966.01 Microgrid Phase 2 $ 86,179.61 $ 86,179.6't $ 0.00 CAES Water Energy Conservation $ 93,354.55 $ 82,332.95 $ 1 1,021.60 IDL Energy Management Phase 2 $ 64,230.00 $ 64,230.00 $ 0.00 Project Manager $ 30,000.00 $ 29,964.27 $ 35.73 Totals $ 372,665.16 $ 358,641.82 $ 14,023.34 D. Cost-Recovery The costs associated with R&D are funded from revenue collected through Avista's Schedule 91 - Energy Efficiency Rider Adjustment. The outstanding balance was rolled over to the current year's R&D budget, as seen in the table in Section A. All R&D projects are invoiced on a time and materials basis with an amount not to exceed. The costs would be included in the Company's annual tariff filing in June if the rider balance requires a true-up. Page | 11 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report March 30.2018 !V. PROJECT BENEFITS A. Residential Static VAR Compensator (RSVC) Year 3 RSVCs offer potentially significant energy savings. The RSVC device increases cost effectiveness by voltage regulation and is a valuable tool in energy efficiency. RSVCs offer distinct advantages over traditional shunt capacitor solutions. RSVCs can operate in capacitive or inductive modes without generating substantial harmonics. This device can be used in smart applications such as: 1. Continuous voltage control at load point 2. Power factor control 3. Mitigation of power quality issues Electrical companies use conservation by voltage reduction (CVR) as a solution for managing power distribution networks. ln order to keep end voltages within acceptable standards, electrical companies should be able to regulate residential voltages. The RSVC provides this solution on a local level. The device has the potential to overtake conventional static var compensator solutions because of its smaller footprint, power controllability and its realization as a single-phase device. B. Micro Grid Phase 2: Downtown Spokane Micro-grid ln recent years the electric industry has focused on increasing reliability by interconnecting between different network systems. This has also helped increase range of service. The biggest drawback of the interconnected system is the sensitivity to rolling blackouts. Microgrids were developed to isolate sections of the system to protect customers. Development of a microgrid will overall increase the reliability of power. Energy banks supplied with the grid can also help supply the peak load. The current microgrid suffers from a significant power quality problem when local generation is insufficient to handle grid mode level loads. The microgrid will include a controller to receive data from multiple points in the system and shed non-essential loads. G. CAES: Water/Energy Conservation Analysis Food production is essential to the infrastructure of the United States. As production increases so do energy and water demands. This study addresses these needs and suggests that production facilities work in conjunction with their utility providers to improve plant systems and operations. Decreased energy consumption has significant financial benefits for the plant under consideration (Litehouse). Avista will also benefit long-term by having energy demands reduced. The study focuses on reviewing Litehouse Foods' current system and determining the where the biggest decrease in energy consumption can be applied. Page | 12 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report Itlarch 1O 2OlR D. IDL Energy Management Phase 2 Because every building and control system is unique, it can be difficult to tune these controls for optimum efficiency on a large scale. Virtual controller commissioning using energy models can identify errors and correct controls. This project aims to streamline this technology by moving it from specific software to a mathematical model that can be generated for any building based on climate, loads and construction. This will help broaden the appeal of the virtual commissioning process and many industry partners may market this as an energy-savings service to their clients. Virtually commissioning the system using a thermal model holds great promise in being able to test for missed energy savings or occupant discomfort as compared to the design intent. V. RESEARCH IN.PROGRESS A. Summary of Research ln-Progress There are currently four projects in progress for the 201712018 academic year. lnterim Reports are included in Appendices I through L. Milestones for each current IPUC funded project are listed in the table below. Page | 13 Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report[rrrnh 30 2O'lR '1. Projoct Menagemont 2. Dovolop Follow.on Proposal E I I I Task 1: RSVC Control Systom Dcaign: Voltage Rogulation Loop 3. Prcpare Final R.porl Task 2: RSVC Control Systom Dosign: Powor Rogul.tion Loop Ta3k 3: Do3ign ol a tunctaonel labor.tory prototyp€ ot en RSVC Task 4: Tosting ot an RSVC prototypo in a laboratory or homa environmont f.sk 5: Final dr.tt Rcport I ''l I TaEk 8: Dellycr flnal r.port .nd pr.sant ro3ult8 at Avlste hcadquartcE fask 'l: ldontity potontial appliaations for 9nergy storagc I I I I I I fask 2: Dotomlna pow.r ratings, ramp ratos fa3k 3: Categorlzc th..ppllcetlons bascd on tha anaillary scrylc.3 thoy provlda fask 4: Roduce th. set ot potontial rn0ineeE fr3k 5: Davclop rn approach tor 3lzlng tnargy atorag. f.3k 5: Sonior deslgn t.am: lmplamcnt modols and for bettary onorgy storago Task 1: Projoct Plenning and Rcportlng T.3k 2: Establish Currcnt Bas.lina Setpoinb Tesk 3: Soloct a Slto Task 4: Colloct Oporational Data I Task 5: Dovolop Energy Modol Task 6: Test Altorn.tivo Controls Task 7: Estimato S.yings I F I IT.Bk 8: D3valop Workflow for Practltlonors Tesk l: Latoretura Survay ..t T.3k 2: As.ogal Ch.mat.rizatlon .nd Acqulrlng Comm.ralal Producta Task 3: Fiold Data Colloclion T.sk 4: Cost Analysis TaBk 5: Environmcntal lmpact l. Projoat Kiakott I I I I L 2. Follow on Proposal to Avista 3. Flnal Roport end Prosontation to Avista 4. IPUC Daliverabl.s Page | 14 Task Dercription sepll'1 a&ifl Nov/l?Dsc/17 Janl18 Feb/18 Mar/18 Aer/1a May/18 Jun/18 tdl18 AuClrC Avista Research and Development Projects Annual Report March 30.2018 B. Other Relevant Activity Project kick-off meetings were held on-site at each University of ldaho location and at Boise State University. A progress meeting is held bi-monthly for each project. These meetings typically take 0.5 hours and include a review of schedule, monthly progress reporting, invoicing, Avista comments, and action items for the next month. The meetings are organized and led by the lndependent Program Manager, T-O Engineers. Attendees for each meeting include the Principal lnvestigator, Co-lnvestigators, Student Researchers, Avista personnel, and the lndependent Program Manager. There are currently four projects in progress for the 201712018 academic year. Funds were rolled over from previous years to fund an additional proyect. Contracts for these projects total $326,755.89. Budget details and funds expended will be summarized in the 2019 Annual Report. Page | 15 lllytsra APPENDIX A Two-Page Reports B AH-rETEBOISE STATE UNIVERSITY OPERATION AND CONTROL OF DISTRIBUTED RESTDENTTAL STATTC VAR COMPENSATORS (RSVC) Project Duration: September 20t6 - August 2017 Project Cost: Total Funding 998,901 OBJEGTIVE The overall goal of the RSVC project during Year III is to demonstrate the RSVC ability to boost low voltage points to the minimum allowable level while reducing the voltage level at the head of the feeder substation. This way, the entire distribution network can take part in conservation by voltage reduction(CVR). Additional benefits include rapid voltage response to distribution feeder eventsat the residential level to improve power quality. BUSINESS VALUE The deployment of multiple RSVCs offers a significant potential for energy savings as well as cost effectiveness by voltage regulation. It can be a valuable tool in a utility energyefficiency and demand-side management programs. INDUSTRY NEED The new single-phase RSVC device has the distinct advantage over a conventional shunt capacitor of being able to operate in acapacitive or inductive mode without generating substantial harmonics. This RSVC employs a novel pulse-width-modulation (PWM) technique applied to two specially- designed bidirectional switches controlling the variable reactive power output. This smart device can be used in multiple applications such as continuous voltage control at a loadpoint, power factor control, mitigation of power quality issues, etc. The new RSVC device has the potential to disrupt current competitor devices on several fronts includingcost, power quality, and smart-grid applicability or compatibility. BACKGROUND Year I of the project consisted of a study model of an RSVC for regulating residential voltages. Year II of the project consisted of developing a hardware prototype of the RSVC. Year III of the project is to investigate the potential benefits of deploying multiple RSVCs on the residential side of the distribution network. PROJEGT TASKS - Year lll Task 1: Project Management Internal weekly project coordination meetings take place every Wednesday morning. Bi- weekly status meetings with Avista take place on Thursdays. Task 2: Data Acquisition Measured residential and substation feeder data has been received from Avista. Task 3: RSVC Dynamic Simulation This task will build upon the open-loop control of the current RSVC prototype by adding a more sophisticated control scheme for voltageand power factor control. This task is ongoing. Task 4: Effect of RSVC on Existing Capacitor Transient Switching Study This task has been assigned as a senior design project at Boise State University. The situation involves the modeling of a 10-mile long distribution feeder with five uniformly distributed loads every two miles. The conductors are made of a/O ACSR wires. Atfull load, each load consumes 300 kVA at0.85 power factor. A fixed 1200-kVAR switched capacitor bank is located at 2/3 of the distance from the main substation and its switching in and out creates an overvoltage affecting the power quality of nearby customers. An RSVC control system is being designed in MATLAB/S|mulink to regulate the voltage level of a sensitive customer and to mitigate the effect of an overvoltage. This task is ongoing. Task 5: RSVC kVAr Size and Voltage Contro! Algorithm Development The RSVC is designed to be installed at the residential service entrance across the 240V bus. Figure 1 shows the proposed installation with a fixed capacitor and a variable inductor. h LOAD Residential Load Bus RSVC 240V Figure 1: Installation Model for RSVC Simulation studies show that the size of the RSVC will be dependent on the lowest voltage point in the distribution system. An analysis of the results indicates that the RSVC can boost the residential service voltage by approximately 5.3 V for each 5 kVAr of shunt capacitance. It is recommended that additional residential and distribution feeder data be simulated to increase the sample set and provide a more accurate estimate than 5.3 V. Because the overall distribution feeder may have short periods of time where the voltage is higher than typical, it is recommended to match the inductive element VAr size to the capacitive element VAr size.This will prevent an overvoltage at the residential service due to the fixed capacitor.This task is complete pending Avista approval. Task 6: Hardware Prototype Developmenti. Hardware Prototype The RSVC prototype is being developed in a power laboratory at Boise State University. This prototype is based on the simulation model shown in Figure 2, This device is a reactive power compensator that can regulatea residential load voltage with a fixed capacitor in shunt with a reactor controlled by two bidirectional switches. The two switches are turned on and off in a complementary manner using a pulse-width modulation (PWM) technique that allows the reactor to function as a continuously-variable inductor. The current RSVC prototype consists of a 190-pF capacitor and a 30-mH inductor choke. The This device can operate in a capacitive or inductive mode without generating substantial harmonics. The RSVC uses a novel pulse-width-modulation (PWM) technique to create the variable reactive compensation. Transformer Output Voltage Figure 2: Simulation Model for RSVC ii. RSVC Hardware Prototype Testing Results Preliminary test results for the hardware prototype were performed at 60 VAC with a20-ohm resistive load. The switching frequency (Fsw) of the two bidirectional switches was varied between 3 k1z and 12 kHz. Table 1 shows the RSVC output voltage (Vo) and RSVC power losses (PL) as a resultof varying the duty cycle at discrete frequencies. Table l: Hardware Results Task 7 & 8: Report and Presentation These tasks are ongoing. PROJEGT TEAM I PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS Name Dr. Said Ahmed-Zaid Orqanization Boise State University Email sa hmedzaid (dboisestate.edu Name Dr. John Stubban Oroanization Boise State University Email ioh nstu bban@boisestate.edu RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Name Muhammad Kamran Latif Orqanization Boise State University Email muhammadlatif@u.boisestate.edu Name Zivano Liano Orqanization Boise State University Email ziya no lia [q@u. boisestate.edu TASK TIME ALLOCATEO START DATE FINISH DATE Dvnamic Sim 3 month ADr'17 luly'17 Existinq Cao SW 4 months Oct'16 May'17 RSVC Sizinq 1 month Oct'16 Mar '17 HW PrototyDe 2 months Oct'16 Auo'17 Final Reoort 2 months lulv'1 7 Auq'17 The information contained in this documenl is proprietary and confidential. .] Distribution Feeder Voltage Lsvc Switch Fixed Cs'c swl Based Bidirectional Switch Switched Inductor DUTY CYCLE OF THE SUYI (D) o=O D = O.5O D = O.7'l D=tFsw kHz Vo (v) PL (rY) Vo (v) PL 0u Vo (v) PL (YY) Vo (v) PL (w) 3 75.4 9 72.4 17 1 6 75.4 9 57.7 19 9 75.4 1g 70.6 )a 57.7 19 12 72.4 22 70.8 29 57.7 19 SGHEDULE I t - - - -'tI i , i I !L The information contained in this documenl is proprietary and confidential Mic Project Duration: 9 months Universityorldaho AHrETtr College of Engineering rogrid Development in Downtown Spokah€, WA Project Cost: $86,179.62 OBJECTIVE In the event of a disaster caused blackout, cities such as Spokane, WA, can suffer substantial economic losses, and potential danger to the public. The implementation of a microgrid system in downtown Spokane will allow the economic losses and public endangerment to be lessened. The microgrid will also help to improve the reliability of the downtown network and allow for critical loads to be kept intact during an extended power outage. The design of the microgrid system utilizes four main energy sources: photovoltaic, gas/diesel generators, battery banks, and two local hydroelectric power plants. The power grid has limitations the system will produce, the microgrid will be designed to feedthe most important facilities only. When generation doesn't meet the demand the least important load must be shed. BUSINESS VALUE The implementation of a microgrid in downtown Spokane allows the reduction of economic losses (due to the sudden shutdown of equipment). Computer shut downs, locks malfunctioning, hospital equipment failures, industry equipment failures, and more; all of these failures contributeto economic losses. The microgrid will allow Avista to keep some power on in the case of a blackout. The microgrid will also alleviate issues when restoring the grid after a blackout. INDUSTRY NEED In the last few decades, the industry has focused on interconnectivity between different network systems in order to increase reliability and rangeof service. A drawback of the current interconnectivity is sensitivity to rolling blackouts. Thus, in order to provide increased reliability, microgrids were developed to temporarily isolate a part of the system to protect those customers from the major events impacting the macrorid. Developing the microgrid will increase the reliability of power in Downtown Spokane. The addition of renewable distributed generation and energy banks to support the microgrid can also be used to help supply the peak load. BAGKGROUND While the Spokane Microgrid is in the "island" mode, it suffers from a significant power quality problem as local generation is insufficient to handle grid mode level loads. There are two efforts to alleviate the energy shortage. One method is load control in the form of a master controller. This controller will receive data from multiple points in the system and shed the non- essential loads. Another method is increasing the amount of available local generation and energy storage. The new generation will be in the form of existing diesel generators at the hospitals, solar panels, and megawatt batteries. SGOPE The scope of this project to create a microgrid for the Downtown Spokane area. In order to do this there are several pieces that need to come together. The following paragraphs discuss how this project is progressing and the next steps to reach completion. Learning RTDS RTDS stands for real time digital simulator. The first semester was spent learning how to use this program. A test case was created using model loads and transmission lines. The parameters of this model power system were all known. By comparing the known values of the power system to the test case values generated from the RTDS program, it was determined that the program was being utilized correctly. By knowing how to use this program alternate models can be built in the future, that will reflect the loads to be looked at in the microgrid. Fault Implementation The next step is to add circuit breakers and faults into the model. Once this is complete the program can run a simulation with a fault present so the circuit breaker would be tripped. Knowing how to trip breakers in RTDS will be key once the load shedding scheme is implemented. Load Shedding In an ideal situation the generation would always meet load conditions and every load could always be served. This is not the case for the downtown microgrid. When the demand is higher than the generating capacity, load must be shed in order to keep the system from crashing. For this task a priority list for the critical loads was provided. The load shedding scheme will first be implemented on the RTDS. This will allow the system to cut the lowest priority load when the demand exceeds the generation. The next step is to implement the load shedding scheme onto the RTAC which stands for Real Time Automation Controller. Human Machine Interface The human machine interface also known as an HMI, will be used to control the RTDS model that is provided. For the development of the HMI a program from SEL, known as the AcSElerator, will be used. Using the AcSElerator will develop the software that will be implemented on the Real Time Automated Controller. The first step to creating the controller is to become familiar with the software being used. Using example projects that are provided by SEL,the AcSElerator program can be better understood. After learning the AcSElerator program, the RTDS model can be uploaded. This will allow the AcSElerator to test the different settings usingthe RTDS model provided. The AcSElerator software will be used to create a master controller that will be used to manage the microgrid. The controller will be able to report the status of the microgrid to the control center where an engineer will be able to determine the best action for islanding. Detailed Specifications for Equipment and Equipment Locations This task includes detailed specifications for equipment that will be used in order to implement our design. This includes cost estimation. Some equipment might be energystorage devices, inverters, transformers, switches, auto-synchronizers, natural gas conversion kits, and much more. This task also includes choosing the best locations to install the equipment listed above. The main concentration being efficient solar panel locations and options for where to place energy storage devices PowerWorld Simulation This task includes integrating our team's design, which will include the location of the solar panels and batteries, with the existing PowerWorld model representing the downtown network. DELIVERABLES The deliverables for this project will be:o Load shedding scheme in RTDSo HMI using AcSEleratoro Photovoltaic locations and power output availableo Battery locations and detailed specificso Options for converting hospital generators to partially natural gaso Options for pairing hospital generators with the grido Detailed cost estimation for design installation PROJECT TEAM SGHEDULE .J grL PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name Dr. Herbert Hess Orqanization University of Idaho Contact #(208) 885-4341 Email hhess@uidaho.edu Name Dr. Brian lohnson Orqanization University of Idaho Contact #(208) 885-6902 Email bioh nson @u ida ho.ed u RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Name Jordan Scott Orqanization University of Idaho Email scoto330(ovandals.uidaho.edu Name Lyn Enqland Orqanization Universitv of Idaho Email Duff4880@vandals. uidaho.edu Name Lexi Turkenburq Orqanization Universitv of Idaho Email Turkg655@vandals. uidaho.edu Name Christine Paoe Oroanization University of Idaho Email Paqe31 14@vandals. uidaho.edu TASK START DATE FINISH DATE Gompletion Small Scale Example Model 9/26/2Ot6 t2/7/2016 100o/o Trip Breaker with Model 9/26/20L6 t2/t/2076 100o/o Trip Breaker with Relay in Model 9/26/20L6 t2/1/2076 100% Mastercontroller 8/22/ZOt6 8lU20t7 25o/o RTDS Model 9/8/2076 6/U20t7 50o/o Load Shedding 9/9/2076 4/t/20t7 25o/o Protection Settings 9/L/2O76 Continuous 50o/o Universityotldaho AHvtsrts College of Engineering CAES Water lEnergy Conseruation Analysis Project Duration: 12 months Project Cost: Total Funding: $90,645.06 OBJECTIVE Food processing is one of the largest consumers of water and energy in the Pacific Northwest. Reducing this consumption is necessary to improve efficiency of systems and is of interest to Avista and its customers in food production. We propose to assist in decreasing water and energy consumption of food processing plants by examining current technologies and suggesting improved systems to better align with consumption needs. We will focus on one customer, Litehouse Foods, and determine where a change in their current systems will provide the largest decrease in energy consumption. These systems will be modeled by two simulation programs, Aspen-HYSYS and Flownex Simulation Environment. The results from both programs will be compared extensively to ensure the accuracy of the results and the effects of any proposed changes to current systems, Based on the simulation results upgrades will be proposed to Litehouse Foods to decrease overall energy usage while improving the efficiency of their systems. They will be encouraged to implement these upgrades in their planned renovations, BUSINESS VALUE Decreased energy consumption has financial benefits for the plant under consideration. In addition, newer technologies will provide them with a longer operation while meeting the demands of their customers and their energy provider. Avista will also benefit in the long-term as their energy demand will decrease, benefitting them financially as well. These changes will also allow them to meet their regulations and demands easier. INDUSTRY NEED Food production is essential to the infrastructure of the United States. As the population continually grows, the amount of food produced also increases. There is also a demand for energy and water efficiency due to the growing population. In order for food production to continue, measures must be taken to improve individually plant efficiencies not only in the Nofthwest, but nationwide. This study addresses these needs and suggests that production facilities work in conjunction with their utilities providers to improve plant systems and operations. BAGKGROUND The growing demand on energy and water supplies jeopardize the delicate balance between food production and, energy and water use. Because of this high water and energy use, the Northwest Food Processors Association (NWFPA) has a goal for its members to reduce energy consumption by 5Oo/o by 2030. Improvements on this goal have declined recently as it becomes more difficult to identify additional savings. In addition, the nature of food production presents obstacles in the heating and cooling within processes. These are often required on a continuous basis to maintain the integrity of the food produced. Any proposed changes to production plants will need to take this into account during the design phase. $*lfa ffi SGOPE Task 1: Prepare Information (COMPLETE) The first task involves making contact with Litehouse Foods in Sandpoint Idaho, touringtheir production facility, and organizing and/or creating modules necessary to perform simulation of energy and water consumption. Task 2: Create Models (IN PROGRESS) Once the sufficient modules have been organized to represent process units in the refrigeration systems, the simulation models in both Aspen-HYSYS and Flownex simulation environment will be created in the following steps: 1. Basic process system with designed operating parameters 2. Incorporation of humidification for all condensers3. Simulation of one summer and one winter month Task 3: Optimize and Upgrade With the working models of the refrigeration system, a performance evaluation will take place considering the required load vs. installed system capabilities. There will be an optimization study to combine currentsystems and remove unnecessary components to maintain required load and significantly decrease energy consumption. Improvements will be proposed to the plant for incorporation into planned renovation. Task 4: Instruct Avista Complete models with modules will be presented to Avista engineers along with detailed instructions on how the model and system operate in conjunction. This will give Avista the tools for further implementation with Litehouse systems as well as additional customers. Task 5: Final Report The final report will include all findings of the study. Information on current plant process systems and constructed models will be included. DELIVERABLES The deliverables for this project will be o Project report and documentationo HYSYS and Flownex models with all modules that would enable Avista engineers to model current plant configurations. Models provided to partnering companyo Training on how to use model and implement for use in other plants PROJEGT TEAM SGHEDULE PRINGIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name Dr. Richard Christensen Organ ization University of ldaho Contact #208-533-8102 Email rch ristensen @ uida ho.edu Name Dr. Karen Humes Organization University of ldaho Contact #208-885-6506 Email kh umes@uida ho.edu RESEARCH ADVISORS Name Dr. Michael McKellar Organization ldaho National Lab Email michael.mckellar@inl.gov Name Dr. Dennis Keiser Organization University of ldaho Email denn isk@uida ho.edu RESEARGH ASSISTANTS Name Jivan Khatry Organization University of ldaho Email Kh at6738 @va n da ls. u ida ho.ed u Name Stephen Hancock Organization University of ldaho Email hanc8362 @va nda ls. uida ho.ed u TASK TIME START DATE FINISH DATE Prepare lnformation 4 month Sep 2016 Dec 2016 Create Models 4 month Jan 2017 Apr 2077 Optimize and Upgrade 2 month Apr 2017 Jun 2017 lnstruct Avista 1 month Jun2OL-1 Jul 2Ol7 Final Report 1 month Jul2OtT Aup,2OL7 t I I\lTTG RATE D D ESIG N LAB Universityolldaho Simulation-Based Commissioning of Energy Management Control Systems Project Duration: 13 months Project Cost: Total Funding $64,230 2016 Funding $34,723 2Qg tqlding $29,507 A,Vvtsrt OBJEGTIVE Optimal controls are essential for building efficiency. However, because every building and control system is unique, it can be a challenge to analyze and tune these controls on a large scale, Using energy models to commission a building is one way to identify errors and correct controls. This virtual controller commissioning can save significant amounts of energy and money. Due to the lengthy period of time required to construct energy models, this approach is rarely utilized. The research proposed herein would streamline the virtual commissioning method and increase its market potential. BUSINESS VALUE The many benefits of this technology have been limited by its tether to specific software platforms (e.9., EnergyPlus and BCWB). The research proposed will help to move this service beyond a specific modeling softwareto a mathematical model that can be generated for any building based on climate, internal loads and construction. This will vastly broaden the appeal of the virtual commissioning process to industry partners who may offer this as an energy-savingsservice to their clients. Controller manufacturers may advertise their products as pre-commissioned. Co-simulation will allow verification of control logic and has been shown to detect faults which were otherwise seen as impossible to predict in the design phase. They may also use the technology to virtually test new and innovative control systems without risks to building owners fromunproven control logics. Virtually commissioning the system using a thermal model holds great promise in being able to test for missed energy savings or occupant discomfort as compared to the design intent. INDUSTRY NEED As the co-simulation adoption and applications grow, the technology allows either building managers or utility companies to provide short-term forecasts of the building behavior and load based on the thermalmodel and weather information. Commissioning based on an EnergyPlus building model has been shown to correctly predict energy demand and forecast shortfalls in the cooling or heating capacity. Utilities,building managers, and/or third-party- providers may embrace this approach as a curtailment strategy to predict and mitigate peak building loads automatically. Once the thermal model is created, and communication is established with the EMS, the economic benefits of automation, fault detection, and prediction are immense. BACKGROUND The COBE (College of Business and Economics) building at the University of Idaho main campus was selected for a physical demonstration of this technology's capabilities in this project. In the previous study, theteam had developed an energy model calibrated to the building's utilities usages and acquired a duplicate of the building's air- handling controller. These were used to explore the EMS logic and test new settings. The process offered insight into the barriers and potential benefits of using simulation- based commissioning. However, the time required to calibrate an EnergyPlus model is extensive, and thus is not utilized by r practitioners. We will develop a methodology of modeling the building using reduced order model techniques, and compare the result tothe previous modeling and commissioning study. This will be accomplished through using a Grey-box uses building attributes to estimate thermal behavior and energy use. SGOPE Task 1: Project Planning and Reporting Conduct team meetings and ongoing project updates, reports and deliverables as requiredby Avista staff, project management contractor and the PUC. Task 2: Gather Baseline Data The next step was to gather historical EMS and weather data from the site location to benchmark savings and to verify the previous study's results. Task 3: Establish Communication at the Site Based upon work completed in 20t4-2OL5,the team would perform a physical implementation of the co-simulation at the site to establish live-data transfer between the EMS and the energy model. This step was rescheduled to the spring in order to capture the proper weather conditions to realize the correct energy savings. During the winter months, the economizer high-temperature lockout is rarely used, and in order to verify the models prediction this task had to be pushed back to a time when the outdoor air temperatures push the economizer is operations to where the controls settings have a significant impact. Task 4: Simplify Energy Model This task involves converting the detailed EnergyPlus models into reduced-order thermal models and using them to tune building controls. This work is being performed in parallel with Task 3. Targeted sub-system monitoring to isolate impact of Task 3 will be conducted as needed and as budget allows. Task 5: Analyze Effectiveness of Reduced Order Model The team will compare the accuracy of the reduced-order model to the EnergyPlus model. The analysis will also include a studyof sensitivity, variable requirements, and complexity of signal communication relativeto the EnergyPlus and the reduced order models.ii[,t Task 6: Develop Workflow for Practitioners The final tasks will be a study of the process that will add to the current literature and promote this technology service to furthercommercialized techniques. This documentation will be part of a master student's academic work and potential publications in a conference or a journal will be sought. DELIVERABLES At the conclusion of the project, the research team should be able to conclude the following:. Reduced Order Model Methodology. Case Study Utilizing Methodology PROJEGT TEAM PRINGIPAL INVESTIGATORS Name Elizabeth Cooper Orqanization University of Idaho Contact #(208\ 40t-o642 Email ecooper@uida ho. ed u Name linchao Yuan Oroanization University of Idaho Contact #(208) 401-0649 Email icvuan @u ida ho.ed u RESEiARCH ASSISTANTS Name Damon Woods Oroanization University of Idaho Email dwoods@uidhaho.edu Name Sean Rosin Orqanization University of Idaho Email srosin@uidaho.edu SCHEDULE IP-In progress TASK TIME ALLOCATED START DATE FINISH DATE STATUS Proiect Plannino 3 months Auo'16 Nov'16 C Gather Baseline Data 2 months Au9'16 Oct'16 C Establish site Communication 1 month Apt't7 MaY'17 IP Reduced Order Model 6 months Dec'16 May'17 IP Effectiveness of Model 4 months Apt'17 Aug'u IP Workflow DeveloDment 2 months Jul'L7 Aug'77 IP The information contained in this document is proprietary and confidenttal Airrtsra APPENDIX B Request for lnterest Avista Corporation East 141I Mission Ave. Spokane, WA99202 A)EvtsrA Request for Proposal @FP) Contract No. R-40239 Avista Energy Research (AER) Initiative INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS Proposals are due by 4:00 p.m. Pacific Prevailing Time (PPT), April 21,2016 (the "Due Date") Avista Corporation is an energy company involved in the production, transmission and distribution of energy as well as other energy-related businesses. Avista Utilities is the operating division that provides electric service to approximately 362,000 customers and natural gas to approximately 323,000 customers. Avista's service territory covers 301000 square miles in eastern Washington, northern Idaho and parts of southern and eastern Oregon, with a population of 1.5 million. Avista's primary, non- regulated subsidiary is Ecova. Avista's stock is traded under the ticker symbol *AVA'. For more for information about Avista,visit www.avistautilities.com. Avista Corporation East 1411 Mission Ave. Spokane, WA99202 AiFvtsrt Avista Corporation ("Avista") RFP Confidentiality Notice This Request for Proposal ("RFP") may contain information that is marked as confidential and proprietary to Avista ("Confidential Information" or "Information"). Under no circumstances may the potential Bidder receiving this RFP use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than to evaluate the requirements of this RFP and prepare a responsive proposal ("Proposal"). Further, Bidder must limit distribution of the Information to only those people involved in preparing Bidder's Proposal. If Bidder determines that they do not wish to submit a Proposal, Bidder must provide a letter to Avista certifying that they have destroyed the Confidential Information, or return such Information to Avista and certify in writing that they have not retained any copies or made any unauthorized use or disclosure of such information. If Bidder submits a Proposal, a copy of the RFP documents may be retained until Bidder has received notice of Avista's decision regarding this RFP. If Bidder has not been selected by Avista, Bidder must either return the Information or destroy such Information and provide a letter to Avista certifuing such destruction. Avista and Bidder will employ the same degree of care with each other's Confidential Information as they use to protect their own Information and inform their employees of such confidentiality obligations. RFP No. R-40239 Page 2 of 9 Avista Corporation East 1411 Mission Ave. Spokane, WA99202 Alfivtstfr lnstructions and Requirements 1.0 PURPOSE in response to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission Order No. 32918, Avista Corporation will fund up to $300,000 per year of applied research that will further promote broad conservation goals of energy efficiency and curtailment. Specifically, Avista is seeking a qualified four year institution in the state of Idaho to provide such applied research (the "Services"). In light of the rapidly changing utility landscape, Avista would be interested in funding research projects which are forward thinking and would assist the utility in the development of product and services which provide an energy efficient commodity to its customers. The applied research and development projects can be one or multiple years and can be used to support university research programs, facility and studies. The following institutions are eligible to submit Avista Energy Research (AER) initiative proposals. 1. University of Idaho 2. Boise State University 3. Idaho State University Persons or institutions submitting a Proposal will be referred to as "Bidder" in this RFP; after execution of a contract, the Bidder to whom a contract is awarded, if any, will be the name of the university ("Institution"). 2.0 STATEMENT OF'WORK The attached Statement of Work ("SOW") specifies the activities, deliverables and/or services sought by Avista. This SOW will be the primary basis for the final SOW to be included under a formal contract, if a contract is awarded. 3.0 RFP DOCUMBNTS Attached are the following RFP Documents: . Appendix A - Proposal Cover Sheet . Appendix B - Sponsored Research and Development Project Agreement 4.0 CONTACTS / SUBMITTALS / SCHEDULE 4.1 All communications with Avista, including questions (see Section 5.1), regarding this RFP must be directed to Avista's Sole Point of Contact ("SPC"): Russ Feist Avista Corporation 1411 East Mission Avenue PO Box 3727,M5C-33 Spokane, WA99220-3727 Telephone: (509) 49 5 -45 67 Fax: (509) 495-8033 E-Mail: russ.feist@avistacorp.com 4.2 Proposals must be received no later than 4:00 PM Pacific Prevailing Time ("PPT"), on April2l, 2016 ("Due Date"). Bidders should submit an electronic copy of their Proposal to bids@avistacorp.com. In addition to an electronic copy, Bidders may also fax their Proposal to 509- 495-8033, or submit a hard copy to the following address: Avista Corporation Attn: Greg Yedinak Supply Chain Management (MSC 33) 1411 E. Mission Ave POBox3727 Spokane, WA 99220-3727 RFP No. R-40239 Page 3 of9 Avista Corporation East t4l I Mission Ave. Spokane, WA99202 Alivtsrfr No verbal or telephone Proposals will be considered and Proposals received after the Due Date may not be evaluated. 4.3 RFP Proposed Project Schedule March2l.2016 April4.20l6 April 11,20r6 April2l,2016 April28.2016 Avista issues RFP Bidder's Questions/Requests for Clarification Due Avista's Responses to Clarifications Due Date Proposals Due Successful Bidder selection and announcement Contract and Statement of Work ExecutedMay 6. 2016 5.0 RFP PROCESS 5.1 Pre-proposal Questions Relating to this RFP Questions about the RFP documents (including without limitation, specifications, contract terms or the RFP process) must be submitted to the SPC (see Section 4.1), in writing (e-mailed, faxed, or addressed in accordance with Section 4.2, by the Due Date. Notification of any substantive clarifications provided in response to questions will be provided via email to all Bidders. 5.2 Requests for Exceptions Bidder must comply with all of the requirements set forth in the documents provided by Avista as part of this RFP (including all submittals, contract documents, exhibits or attachments). Any exceptions to these requirements must be: (i) stated separately, (ii) clearly identify the exceptions (including the document name and section), and (iii) include any proposed altemate language, etc. Failure by Bidder to provide any exceptions in its Proposal will constitute full acceptance of all documents provided by Avista as part of this RFP. While Avista will not consider alternate language, etc. that materially conflicts with the intent of this RFP, Avista may consider and negotiate the inclusion of terms that would be supplemental to the specific document if such terms reasonably relate to the scope of this RFP. 5.3 Modification and/or Withdrawal of Proposal 5.3.1 ByBidder: BiddermaywithdrawitsProposal atany time. Biddermaymodiffasubmitted Proposal by written request provided that such request is received by Avista prior to the Due Date. Following withdrawal or modification of its Proposal, Bidder may submit a new Proposal provided that such new Proposal is received by Avista prior to the Due Date and includes a statement that Bidder's new Proposal amends and supersedes the prior Proposal. 5.3.2 By Avista: Avista may modifu any of the RFP documents at any time prior to the Due Date. Such modifications will be issued simultaneously to all participating Bidders. 5.4 ProposalProcessing 5.4.1 Confidentiality: It is Avista's policy to maintain the confidentiality of all Proposals received in response to an RFP and the basis for the selection of a Bidder to negotiate a definitive agreement. 5.4.2 Basis of Any Award: This RFP is not an offer to enter into an agreement with any party. The contract, if awarded, will be awarded on the basis of Proposals received after consideration of Bidder's ability to provide the services/work, quality of personnel, extent and quality of relevant experience, price and/or any other factors deemed pertinent by Avista, including Bidder's ability to meet any schedules specified in the Statement of Work. 5.4.3 Pre-award Expenses: A11 expenses incurred by Bidder to prepare its Proposal and participate in any required pre-bid and/or pre-award meetings, visits and/or interviews will be Bidder's responsibility. RFP No. R-40239 Page 4 of9 Avista Corporation East l41l Mission Ave. Spokane, WA99202 AiTr-nsrr 5.4.4 Proposal Acceptance Term: Bidder acknowledges that its Proposal will remain valid for a period of 60 days following the Due Date unless otherwise extended by Avista. 5.5 Contract Execution The successful Bidder shall enter into a contract that is substantially the same as the Sponsored Research and Development Project Agreement governing the performance of the Services/Work applicable under this RFP included as Appendix B. However. those Universities that have prior written agreements with Avista" may mutuall), agree to utilize those agreements with an extension and some modifications to the documents. 6.0 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMITTALS Bidder's Proposal must conform to the following outline and address all of the specified content to facilitate Avista's evaluation of Bidder's qualifications; approach to performing the requested Services/Work; and other requirements in the SOW. Proposals will be evaluated on overall quality of content and responsiveness to the purpose and specifications of this RFP, including the information set forth in Section 6.5 below. 6.1 Proposal Process Each eligible institution will be limited to TEN specific proposal submittals. One representative of the eligible institutions will be responsible for submitting all of the proposals. The proposal must not exceed 6 pages not including the appendices. The proposal shall be in I I point font, 1.5 spaced and one inch margins. The original and one electronic copy of the proposal (PDF - Form) must be provided to Avista's point of contact listed herein. 6.2 Proposal Submittals The following items are required with Bidder's Proposal. Each proposal shall contain the following project elements. 1. Name of Idaho public institution; 2. Name of principal investigator directing the project; 3. Project objective and total amount requested (A general narrative summarizing the approach to be utilized to provide the required services); 4. Resource commitments, (number of individuals and possible hours for services); 5. Specific project plan (An outline of work procedures, technical comments, clarifications and any additional information deemed necessary to perform the services); 6. Potential market path; 7. Criteria for measuring success; 8. Budget Price Sheet / Rate Schedule; 9. Proposal Exceptions to this RFP (if any); 10. Appendix A - Proposal Cover Sheet (last 2 pages of this document) 11. Appendix C: Facilities and Equipment 12. Appendix D: Biographical Sketches and Experience of the principle investigators and / or primary research personnel for each project (ifdifferent individuals for each project submitted) RFP No. R-40239 Page 5 of9 Avista Corporation East 141I Mission Ave. Spokane, WA99202 A)Evtsrt 6.3 Proposal Cover Sheet Bidder must fiIl out, sign and date the attached Proposal Cover Sheet. The signatory must be a person authorized to legally bind Bidder's company to a contractual relationship (e.g. an officer of the company). 6.4 Institution Information o Institution Oualilications Bidder shall provide information on projects of similar size and scope that Bidder has undertaken and completed within the last five years. Please include a list of references on Appendix A that could be contacted to discuss Bidders involvement in these projects. Institution Resources Identify any unique or special equipment, intellect, hardware, and software or personnel resources relevant to the proposed Services that Bidder's firm possesses(list in Appendix D). o Project Personnel Qualifications Provide a proposed organization chart or staffing list for a project ofthis size and scope and identiff the personnel who will fill these positions. If applicable, identiff project managers who will be overseeing the Services and submit their resume identifring their work history, (please see Section 6.2, question f4). o Approach to Subcontracting If Bidder's approach to performing the Services will require the use of subcontractors, include for each subcontractor: (a) a description oftheir areas ofresponsibility, (b) identification ofthe assigned subcontractor personnel, (c) resumes of key subcontractor personnel, (d) a summary of the experience and qualifications of the proposed subcontracting firms in work similar to that proposed, and (e) a list ofreferences for such work. 6.5 Evaluation Criteria Avista will evaluate each proposal based upon the following criteria: 6.5.1 Project Requirements. Strength ofProposal o Responsiveness to the RFP r Creativity in Leveraging Resources o Samples of Work Products o Overall Proposal (Complete, Clear, Professional) 6.5.2 Strength & Cohesiveness ofthe Project Team Overall ability to manage the project Technical ability to execute the Services Research/analysis ability Project milestones with clear stage and gates (annually) Overall team cohesiveness Qualifications and Bxperience Experience working with electric utilities Proj ect management and multi-disciplined approaches Experience working with organizations in a team atmosphere a a a a a 6.5.3 o a O RFP No. R-40239 Page 6 of9 Avista Corporation East l4ll MissionAve. Spokane, WA99202 A)Evtsrfr 7.0 RESERVATION OF AVISTA RIGHTS: Avista may, in its sole discretion, exercise one or more of the following rights and options with respect to this RFP: . Modiff, extend, or cancel this RFP at any time to obtain additional proposals or for any other reason Avista determines to be in its best interest; o Issue a new RFP with terms and conditions that are the same, similar or substantially different as those set forth in this or a previous RFP in order to obtain additional proposals or for any other reason Avista determines to be in its best interest; o Waive any defect or deficiency in any proposal, if in Avista's sole judgment, the defect or deficiency is not material in response to this RFP; o Evaluate and reject proposals at any time, for any reason including without limitation, whether or not Bidder's proposal contains Requested Exceptions to Contract Terms; o Negotiate with one or more Bidders regarding price, or any other term of Bidders' proposals, and such other contractual terms as Avista may require, at any time prior to execution of a final contract, whether or not a notice of intent to contract has been issued to any Bidder and without reissuing this RFP; o Discontinue negotiations with any Bidder at any time prior to execution of a final contract, whether or not a notice of intent to contract has been issued to Bidder, and to enter into negotiations with any other Bidder, if Avista, in its sole discretion, determines it is in Avista's best interest to do so; o Rescind, at any time prior to the execution of a final contract, any notice of intent to contract issued to Bidder. [BND OF RBQUEST FOR PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS] RI'P No. R-40239 PageT of9 Avista Corporation East 14ll MissionAve. Spokane, WA99202 A)Evtsrt APPEIIDIX A - Proposal Cover Sheet Bidder Information Organization Organization Form: (sole proprietorship, p".t*.thtpfr.@rporation, etc.) Primary Contact Person:Title: City. State. Zip: Telephone:_ Fax Federal Tax ID# E-mail Address Name and title of the person(s) authorized to represent Bidder in any negotiations and sign any contract that may result ("Authorized Representative") : Name: Title: If classified as a contractor, provide contractor registration/license number applicable to the state in which Services are to be performed. Provide at least three references with telephone numbers (please verifu numbers) that Avista may contact to verifr the quality of Bidder's previous work in the proposed area of Work. REFERENCE No. I Organization Name: Contact Person Project Title: Telephone Fax: Email REFERENCE No. 2: Organization Name: Contact Person Project Title Telephone: Fax: Email: REFERENCE No. 3 Organization Name:Telephone: Fax: RFP No. R-40239 Page 8 of9 Avista Corporation East l4l I Mission Ave. Spokane, WA99202 AFrstsrx Contact Person Project Title: Email: By signing this page and submitting a Proposal, the Authorized Representative certifies that the following statements are true: 1. They are authorized to bind Bidder's organization. 2. No attempt has been made or will be made by Bidder to induce any other person or organization to submit or not submit a Proposal. 3. Bidder does not discriminate in its employment practices with regard to race, creed, age, religious affiliation, sex, disability, sexual orientation or national origin. 4. Bidder has not discriminated and will not discriminate against any minority, women or emerging small business enterprise in obtaining any subcontracts, ifrequired. 5. Bidder will enter into a contract with Avista and understands that the final Agreement and General Conditions applicable to the Scope of Work under this RFP will be sent for signature under separate cover. 6. The statements contained in this Proposal are true and complete to the best of the Authorized Representative' s knowledge. 7 . If awarded a contract under this RFP, Bidder: (i) Accepts the obligation to comply with all applicable state and federal requirements, policies, standards and regulations including appropriate invoicing of state and local sales/use taxes (if any) as separate line items; (ii) Acknowledges its responsibility for transmittal of such sales tax payments to the taxing authority; (iii) Agrees to provide at least the minimum liability insurance coverage specified in Avista's attached sample Agreement, if awarded a contract under this RFP. 8. If there are any exceptions to Avista's RFP requirements or the conditions set forth in any of the RFP documents, such exceptions have been described in detail in Bidder's Proposal. 9. Bidder has read the "Confidentiality Notice" set forth on the second page of these "NSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS" and agrees to be bound by the terms of same. Signature Date: *** THIS PAGE MUST BE THE TOP PAGE OF BIDDER'S PROPOSAL *** RFP No. R-40239 Page 9 of 9 Airrlsra APPENDIX C Boise State University Agreement I. TARTIES SI'ONSORID RESIARCH AND DE\/ULOPNTENT PRO.IECT AC]rll|iNIENI' 'fHlS Agrcement is made and entered into by and benveen Boise State Universit-v. an ldaho state institution of higher education (Universiry). and Avista Corporalion. a Washington corporation (Sponsor;. In this Agreement, the ahove entities are somc-times re{'ened to as a Parr.v and jointly reterred to as Parties. II. PURPOSE 2.1 'Ilris Agrcement provides the terms and conditions lor an Avista-sponsorcrJ cncrgy- efficiency applied research and developmenl project wlrich is ol' mutusl interest and benefit to University and Sponsor. and which has been approved by the ldaho Public Utilities Commission under Order 12918. The pertbrmance of such sponsored research and development projcct is consistent rvith Universitv's status as a non-profit, tax-exempt, educational institution. antl ma1, dr.'rive benetlts for Sponsor, University. and sociery" by the advancenrent uf knuwledge irr the' field of study identified. The perlbrnrance of such sponsored research and developnrettl projects may also derive beneflts for Sponsor through thc dcvclopnlenl of encrgy el'ficiency products and/or services thut could be ofl'ered to Avista cuslonlers in ldalro and other jurisdictions and/or licensed or sold to other utilities or their custonrenr b-l' Avista. t.l a 1 1.3 Llniversitv's capabilities retlect a substantial public investment. which tJnivcrsity, a.s a pan of its mission as a state higher education instirution. rvishes to utilize in a cooperative and collaborative efforl rvith Sponsor, including substantinl finirncinl investment in sponsored research and development projects, as described below. III. DEFINITIONS l. I "Budget" shall mean the Project Budget contained in .4tteclmtenr ..1- Builgat. rvhich is he'reh,v" i nc orporatc-d by reference. t.2 "Project Director(s)" shall be as described in each Scope o[ Work. rvho shall lre the principal investigator for the R&D Project. f,-l "Sponsor Liaison" shall be as described in each Scope of'Work, a Sponsor representative tlesignated by Sponsor to be thc prinrar-v contact rvith the Project Director. .1.1 "Sponsored R&D Project" shall mean the Avista-sponsr.rred research and development project covered by this Agreement tbr the perfonnance by Universiry ol'the Scope of Work under the direction of the Project Director. j._i "Scopr- oI Work" shall mean each scope of'rvork for thc Sponsored R&D l'rojecl. utrder lhe direction of the Project Director, and any other attachrnents that nray provide additional informalion on the Sponsored project to bc perlbmrcd. 3.6 "Conlldential Information" shall mean any information, experience or data regarding a disclosing Party's plans, prograrns. plants. processes, pnrducts. cost.s. equipme nl operations or cuslomers, including u'ithout limitation algorithms, formulae. techniqtrcs. I Avisra Connacr lt-4 1002 (OSP n"o.7278) improvenrents. technical drawings and data, and computer sohrvart. rvhetlrer in written, -eraphic, oral or otlrer tangible form, designated in writing as conlidential bl' thr. disclosing Party at tlie time of disclosure to lhe receiving Party. "lntelleclual Property" shalI mean any lnvention. Copl,right. 'l'rademark, Iltask Work, Trade Secret, and/or Proprietary lnformation producetl under the Scopc of Wtlrk. l. ti "Invenlion" shall mean cerlain inventions and/or discoveries conceived and redtrced to practicc during the period of performance of the Sponsored R&D Project and through performance of the Scope of Work. and rcsulting patenls. divisionals. continuations. or substitutions of such applications. all reissues and foreign counter?arts thcrcof. uprrrr which a Universiry or SPONSOR employ'ee or agent is or ma1' be a nanred inventor. 3.9 "lnvention Disclosure(s)" shall mean a rvrifien disclosure of a potentiallv pttentable lnvention(s) provided to Sponsor and/or the Universiry's Technologv l'ransfer C)lfics. Ll0 "Copyrighted Material" shall mean any rvork developed under the Sc'ope of \\/ork lhat is subject to copyright under copyright larv whether or not registered undcr ltderal copyright law. and including any arrd all moral rights tht-reto. i.l I "Trademark" shall mean any trade or service marks developed under tlre Scope ol Work rvhether or not registered under either state or federal lrademark larv, and includirrg all relaled goodwill. 3.12 "Mask Work" shall mean any t\yo or three dimensional layout or topologv of an integrated circuit developed in the Sponsored R&D Project under the Scope ol Work. i.13 "Equipment" shall mean tangible personal property (including inlbrnration technologr systems) hrving a useful lit'e of rnore than one ),ear and a per-unit acquisition cosl exceeding $-i.000.00. J,ll "Supplies" shall mean all tangible personal propertv other lhan Iirluipmcnl lV. SCOPE OF WORK: NO WARRANTY 4,1 Unir,ersit-v shall fi,rmish the labor, materials. arid equiprncnl necessary to provide the services applicable under this Agreement in accordance rvith written Scopes of Work, mutually agreed to by the Parties. Such Scopes of Work will be inct:rporated into this Agreement by this reference r.r,hen executed by both Parties. a sample o[ which is irrcluded in this Agreement as .-lttathment .4-Budget, Attuchnrcnt A Sutpe o.l lllork. ;1.:Modit'ications to a Scope of Work requested by Sponsor will be perlbrmed in accortltncc rvith a wrilten Change Ordcr. mutually agreed to b-y the Parties. Changc Orders will be ilrcorporated into this Agreement by this reference upon executir-rn by both Perlies. I:or Sponsor. a Change Order may be signed by eitlrer Sponsor or b1, Sponsor's 1'hird Party Pro.iect Manager. 4.1 Urriversit-v agrccs to usc its reasonable c.llbrts [o perfonl thc'serviccs outlined irr anv Scope of Work in accordance with the terms and conditions ol' this Agreement. UNIVERSITY DOES NO'f REPRESENT, WN RRANT. OR CL'ARANI-ET.] 1'IIA'I-'TIIE DESIRED RESULTS WIT.L BE OI]1'AINF,D UNDIR TI-IIS ACREEMENT. ADD:1'IONALLY. L'NIVERSITY MAKES NO RI,PRISEN'IATION AS TO TI'IT 2 Avista Ci,ntmct R-41002 (OSP No. 7278t PA1'I]N1'ABII.ITY OR PROTECI'ABILII'Y OF ANY IN'I'ELL bC' I'LIAI. PROPER-ry CREA'TED LTNDER THIS AGREEMENI" -l.i KickOlTMeeting/ReportingRequiremens. Kic'k-off Meeting. Within thirty (30) da1,s ol'executing this Agret'ment and/or an associatsd Scope of Work, the Universir.v rvill anend (eitlrer in person or telephonically) a kick-off meeting with the Sponsor. Progress Reports. Universiry -shall provide .r lwo pagc vvrinen report orr tlrc progress of the Scope of Work every six (6) nronths lirllorving the excculion of such Scope of Work. 1.i.3 Final Technical Repon, Universit-v shall furnish a tinal writr!'n repon withirr thirtv (30) days of corrlrletion ol'the Period ol'Perlbrmancc as del"inrd in Section5.l. This report will include al a minimum: a suntman, ol' pro-iect accomplishments. a summary of budget e.xpcnditures. stage and gates status, tuumber of thculry utilized, studenl participation, ancl a status ol the projcct antl complelion timelines. Sponsor and Llniversiry" will identify whelher such report will bc presenled in person or clectronicall.v in each Scopc. of W'errk. 4.3.4 Final Financial Report. A t'inal t'inancial report shall be furnished rvithin sixty (60) days of completion of thc Period of Perfonnanct. as dcfinr..d in Section 5 . I . 4.4 Third Party Project Manager. Sponsor rvill retain an independerrt third party to assist Sponsor with monitoring nrilestones and deliverables fcrr each Scope of Work. Iiniversitl, agrees to cooperate with such third part-v and provide any requested intbrmation in a tinrely manner. V. (;ENERAL-I'ERMS AND CONDITIONS ln consideration of the mutual premises and covenants contained herein. the Partics a_qree to the lbllorving ternrs and conditions. 5.1 Pc'riod of Pertbrmance. The speeific period o1'pcrformancc lbr euch project will be detined in each Scope ol'Work. and any changes rvill be nrutually agreed upon in writing be'hveen the Parties in acctlrdance with the Change Ordcr process set ,'orth in Sectir:n {"2. _i.2 Funding, Sponsor agrees to reimburse University for services performed under this Agreemenl on a time and materials basis in accordance n,ith each Project Budget (as described in Section 5.3 below). including any not to excecd amounts. Any unspent funding remaining upon Sponsor's acceptance of University's Final 'l'echnical Report under Section .1.3.3, above, and its Final Financ'ial Report under Section -1.3.4. above- the expiration or lerm of the Agreement shall be returned to Sponsor. 5.3 Proiect Budget. Each Scope of Work u'ill set fo(h a Project Budget (see..lllrrr'lrntent .-l- Sutpe oflVork und Budgef . Deviations from this Project Budget may be nrade to and fronr any expenditure line item within the University systL'nr. as long as such deviation is reasonable and necessary in the pursuit of the Scope of Work and pre-approvcd by Sponsor. provided however that University shall nol be requirecl to receivc prior ruriflen approval for amounts less than $500. The total amount identit'ied in each Scope of Work rnay not be exceedc'd witltoul prior written agreement through a Change Order. j Avista Contract R;[1002 (OSP No. 7278) 4.3. r 4,3.1 5l lnvoices. Payments are due to University rvithirr thirty 1301 dals tiom the lJniversitl, inverice date. lnvoices should be sent to Namc/Title: Randv Cnar'dinqer Phone: 509-495-?047 Addrcss: l,lll E.Ave.E-m a i I : Randy. C naed i n gc'r ftjrav i stacorp. cont CityiState/Zip: Spokane. WA 99220 5._i Equipment and Supplies. University shall retain iitle to ani l:quipnrcnt and Supplies purclrased rvith l'unds provided b-v Sponsor under this Agreenrr.rrt. 56 Kcy Persorurel. The Pro.ject Director may select and supervise other Sponsored R&L) Projecl staff as needed to perform the Scope of Work. No othr..r person rvrll be substituted for tlte Project Director, e.\cepl rvith Sponsor's approval. Sponsor may exercise Termination for Convenierrce provisions of this Agreenrent if a satislactory subslitute- is not identified. 5.7 Cr:nuol of Scope of Work, The control of the Scope of Work rests entirely u,itlr Sponsor. but control of the perfonrrance of the [Jniversity and the Sponsored R&D Projcct staff in execuling the Scope of Work rvithin the Sptrnsored R&D Projer.-t shall rc.st entirell, u'ith Univcrsit-\'. The Parties agree that Universit-v, through its Prnject Dircetor. shall mainlairr regular communicalion with the designated liaison f,or Sponsor and tl:e Llniversity'ri Project Direclor and Sponsor's Liaison shall mururll1.' deline thc fieclucncy and nature ol' such comrrrunications. i.8@ 5.8.1 I'o the extent allowed by larv. and subject to the publication provisions sel lbnh in Scction 5.9 belorv, University and Sponsor agree to usc reasonable care to avoid unauthorized disclosure of Cont'idential lnfornration. including u,ithout limitation taking mcasures to prevent crcaling a prenaturr' bar to a Llnited States or loreign palent application. Each Party will limit access to. und any publication or disclosure of. Confidential Inlormation received fronr anolher Party hr,'rr"'to and/or created and reduced to practice as a part of the Sponsored R&D Projurct. to those persons having a need to know. Each Par-ty shall cnrplrry the sanrc- reasonable sat'eguards in receiving, storing. transmitting. and using Cont'idential lnformalion that each l'arry normally exercises with respr'ct to its orvn potentially patentable inventions and other confidential infonnation of signilicanl value . 5.8.2 Cont'idcntial Information shall not be disclosed by thc receiving Party to a third party: (i) for a period ol'three (3) years from receipt ol such Conlidential Information; or (ii) until a patent is published or the Conlldential Irttbrmation o1- a Parry is published by the disclosing Parr-r': or (iii) tlniversity and Sponsor mutually agree to such release in a rvriting signc'd b-v hoth Panies. Notwithstanding thc above. any lntellectual Properq' arising out ol. created or reduced to praciice as a pan of the Sponsored R&D Project shall bc' subjecl to the requirements set lbrth belorv in Section 5.9 4 Avista Conracl R-41002 (OSI'] No. 7378) 5.8.3 Ths terms of conl'identiality set forth in this Agreement shrll not bc conslrucd to limit the partics' right to independently develop products s,itlrout thc usc ol' rnother Party's Conl'ldential I nformation. 5.8.4 i. ii, iii, iv, vi. 5 .{r'ista Contract R-4 l00l (OSt' No. 7178 ) Confidential Information shall not include information which: was in the receiving Part-v's possession prior to receipt ol' thc disclosed information: is or becomes a matler ot' public knowledge through no lauh of the receiving P"rry; is received from a thirtl party without a dury ol'confidentiality; is indepcndently developed by the receiving Party: is required to be disclosed under operation of larv. including but not linrited to tlre Idaho Public Records Act. l.C. $$ 9-337 through 9-350; is reasonably ascertained bv LINIVERSITY or SPOn\SOR to crcatL' a risk ttr a person involved in a clinical trial or to general public health and satbty. 5.9 Publisation. Sponsor and University acknow'ledge the necd to baknce Sponsor's ncctl to protect comnrercially leasiltle teclrnolo-eies, prodtrct-s. nnd prouesses. including the prescrvation of lhe patentability of Invr..ntions arising out ot. created in or retJuccd to practice as a part of the Sponsored R&D Project that fall within the Scopc ol'Work. with Universiry's public rcsponsibilitv to freely disseminate scientific findings frrr the advancement ol' knorvledge. lJniversity recognizes that the public disscmination of infonnation based upon the Scope of Work perforrned under tlris Agreemcnt cannot contain Confidential lnformation (unless au{horizsd tbr disclosure per subseclion 5.8.? abqve). nor should it jeopardize Sponsor's or University's abilih, to commercialize Intellectual Property developed hereunder. Similarly. Sponsor recognizes that thc scientilic results of the' Sponsored R&D Project rnay be publishablc after Sponsor's interests and patent rights arr,' protected and, subject to the contidentiality provisions of tltis Agreernent. may be presentable in fonrnrs such as symposia or international, national or regional professional meetings. or published in vehicles such as books, journals. rvebsites. theses. or dissertations. University and Sponsor r-:och agree not to publish or othenvise disclosc Sponsor Confidential lntbrnration or L)nivcrsity Confidential lnformation. unless authorizcd in writing by the disclosing Party. Sponsor agrecs that Llniversit-r,, subject to revierv by Sponsor, shall have the right to publish results of the Sponsored R&D Project. excluding Sponsor Confidential Information that is not euthorized in u'riting to be disclosed by Sponsor. Sponsor shall be fumished copies of any proposed publication or prcsenlation it leest thirt-y (30) days before subrnission ol'such proposed publieatir:n or presenlation. During that time, Sponsor shall have the right to revierv the material lbr Sporuor Confidential lnformation and to assess the patentability of any lnvention describcd in the malerial, lf Sponsor decides that a patent application [or an lnvcntion should he llled or other Intcllectual Property t'iling should be pursued, the publication or presentation shall bc delayed an additional sixty 160) da1's or until a patent application or other application lbr protection ollntellectual Propc'rty is filed. rvhichever is sooner. At Sponsor's ruquest, Sponsor Conlldential lnlbrmation -shull hc delcted lo the extent permissible' by and in compliance rvith University's record retention obligations. provided. howL'vcr thrrt during suclr retention periods. Universitv shall maintain the Sponsor Conl'idential lnltrmration in accordance with Section 5.S. 5.l(") Publicitr-. Neither Paqv shall use the name of the other Part1,, nor any nrember of thc other Part_v's employees, nor either Parry's Tradenrarks in any publicity. advertising. -i, t I sf,les promotion. news release. nor other publicit,r" matter withoul tlre prior writtcn approval ofan autltorized representative ofthat Party. Tcnnination fbr Canyenjsnce, This Agreement or any individual Scopc of Work rnay be terminated by either Parry hereto upon writlen notice delivered to the other Parry at least sixt).(60) days prior to lhe date oltermination. By such lerminalion. ncither Parly nray nullity obligations already incurred prior to the date of lennination. llpon receipt of any such notice of tcrmination. Universitl' shall, except as otherwise tlirccted by Spo:rsor- irnmediately stop performance of $e services or Work {o the extcnt spee ified in such notice. Sponsor shall pay all reasonable costs and non-cancelable obligations incurred by University as of the date of termination. Universiry shall use its reasonahlc ellbrts to minimize the compensation payable under this Agreement in thc event of such termination. 5.12 Ternrination tbr Cause. Either Party rnay ternrinate this AgreernL'nt or an individual Scope of Work at any time upon thirty (30) days' prior written noticc in the evcnt of a material breach by the other Parry. provided the breaching Party has not cured sur":h brcach during suclr 30-da1' period. A material breach inchrdes. rvithoul lirnitaliort. insolvency. bankruptcy. general assignment [or lhe bencfit ol creditors. or becoming the subject of any proceeding commenced under any statute or lau, tbr the rclicloldebtors. or if a receiver. truslce or liquidator of any property or iuctrnte tll' eithcr Party is appointed, or il' Univenity is not perfonning the services in accordance with this Agreement or an individual Scope i:f Work. 5. li Temination Oblisations. ln addition to those obligations set out in 5.ll and -5.12. any tcrmination of this Agreement sr an individual Scope ol' Work shall not relieve either Parh' of any obligations incurred prior to thg datc of tcrmination including. but not limiteiJ to, Sponsor's responsibility to pa)' Universiry, lbr all rrrrrk pcrlornred through the date of termination, calculaled on a pro-rata basis given lhc. pr,'rcr-'ntage ol'cr.rn:pletion of the Sponsored R&D Project on the elfective date o[ tlrc tr'rnrination. and tirr reimbursenrent to University ot'all non-cancelable conrnrilnrents alre'ad1, incurrcd tilr thc terminaied Sponsored R&D Project. Upon termination, Univcrsity shall prornptl-v dcliver to Sponsorall Sponsored R&D Projsct deliverables. whether conrplete or still in progress. and all Sponsor Confidential lnfonnation disclosed to University in connection with thc' Sponsored R&D Project. Additionally. in the event lntellectual Propertv was created &\ a result of the Sponsored R&D Project. Sponsors' rights to negotiate a license to such lntellectual Proper"ty shall apply pursuant to Seetion 5.16 belorv, imd thr-'paflies agree to execute any documents evidencing joint ownership. if applicable. Thc' riglrts and obligations of Article 5.8 ol'this Agreenrcnt shallsurvive lermination. 5.14 Dispute Resolution. Any and all claims, disputes or controvrrsiss nrising under, ou1 ol. or in connection rvith this Agreement. which the Parties hereto shall he unablc ttl rcsolvc rvithin sixty (60) days, shall be rnediated in good thith by the Panies' rr'spective Vice l'residents for Research or equivaL'nt. |rl6thing in this Agreenrent shsll be construed to lirnit the Parties' choicc of a nrutually acceptable dispute resolution mqthod in additisn to the dispute rcsolulion procedure outlined above, or to limit the Parties' rights to any remedy al larv or in equity tor breach of the terms ol this Agreement and the right to receive reasonablc attorney's fiees and costs incurred in enforcing the terms of tlris Agreemcnt. 6 Avista Conract R-41002 (OSP No.7278) 5. l5 7 Avists Contract R-11002 (OSP No. 7278t Disclaimer. LINIVERSITY MAKES NO EXPRESS OR lMPLltiD W.,\RltAN'fY AS TO THE CONDITIONS OF' THE SCOPE OI-' WORK. SPONSORF.D PROJECT OR ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, CENER TED INFORMNTION, OR PRODUC'I MADE OR DEVELOPED UNDER TIIIS AGRIiEMENI', OR lHE MERCHANTABILITY. OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PLJRPOSI] OF 'TFIIl SPONSORED PROJEC'I-. SCOPE OF WORK. OR RESULTING PRODLICT. -i. l6 lntellectual Property. 5.16.1 Universitl' lntellectual Property. University shall orvu ull riglrts and titlc to Intellectual Property created solely b1, Llniversity employees, 5.16.2 Sponsor Intellectral Propert.v. Sponsor shall or.vn all rights and title to Intellecrual Property created solely by Sponsor and without use of University resources under this Agreement. 5.16.3 .lOlNT lntellectua] Property. University and Sponsor will jointly own anv and all lntellecrual Properry developed jointly (e.9., t<-r the extent the partic's rvould bc' considered joint inventors and/or .ioint copyright holdcrs. as applicable- unrler relevan( U.S. intellectual property laws) undcr this Agrcr.'mcnt. 5.16.4 Either Parry may tile tbr and maintain lrrtellectual Propen-v protections lbr Joint lntellectual Properry dcveloped under this Agreement. ln the evenl that a Parq, wants to obtain or maintain any lntellectual Propeny proteclions conccrnin-si Joint lntellectual Property. the non-filing Parry agrees to cxL'cute any associated documentation reasonably requested. 5.16.5 Joint lntellectual Propertl,shall be ortned equalll,b1,the panies. Exccpt as provided below. the parties acLnowledgc:1i1 to share cqually all cxpcnscs incurred in obtaining and nraintaining Intellectual Propertv prolections on Joint lntellectual Properry, and (ii) that each Pany shall have the right to license such Joint lnventions to third partie's (uith the riglrt to sublicensel u'ithout acctruutirrg to the other and without the consenl of tlre other. 5,16.6 Reserved. -5.16.7 Nonvithstanding the tbregoing. a Parry rnay decidc al any tirne that il does not wanl to financially support Intellectual Propcrry protcctions for certain Joint Intellectual Property (a 'Non-Sunnortins PsrM'). ln that case, tlrc' other Party is tiee ts seeh and obtain such lntellectual Properly protectiol'ls al its own expense ta '!g.Apg4!Sg_Eartv"), providcd that titlc to any such lntellectual Properly proteclions shall still be held jointly by thc parties. .i.16.8 Universiry and Sponsor rvill promptly disclose to the other Party in rvriting any lntellectual Property made durin-e the scrvices purformcd herc'under, Such written disclosure by University shall be sufJlcicntly detailed ltrr Sponsor tu assess the commercial viabiliry of the technology and shall be provided arrd maintained by Sponsor in confidencc pursuant to the ternrs of Article 5.8. Sponsor shall have up to ninety (90) days trom thr' reccipt ol'thc disclosure tL'r inform University whelher it elects to have University tilt- a patent application or otherwise scek Intellectual Property prolection pursuant to the procedures set forth below. 5. 16.()University hereby grsnts to Sponsor an option to negotiale an exclusive license under any University lntellectual Properry rights thal Sponsor rvishcs to pursue (the "Negotiation Right"). Llniversit-v agrees to negotiate in eood laith to attRrrpt to establish the terms ol a license agreement granting the Sponsor tlre exclusive rights to malie. have made. usc. sell. offer to sell. expon and import products in the applicable tleld ol'use under thc applicable lntellectual Property rights. Such license agreement shall be in accordance with policies, procrrdurcs and guide lines set out by the ldaho State Board of Etlucation. and shall includc al leflsl the follorving provisions: a license t'ee. annual maintenance payments/nrinimum royalties, milestone pa)'ments lrvhere applicable) and royaltl, paynrents. payrnent of'all past and future costs incuned by Universiry associateil u'illr thc protc.ction. prorecution and maintenance of the University lntellecrual []ropcny- rights" the limited right to grant sublicenses. sublicense tbes. a commitment hy thg Sponsor and any approved sub-licensccs to exert best cllbrts to introduce liccnsed producb into public use as rapidly as practicelble. the right ol' Universitv to terminate the license agreement should the Sponsor nol meet on), negotialed due diligence milestones. a comnritmenl to maintain the conlldentiality o!" my l-lniversiry Confidential Inlormation under lntellcclual Propcrtv Rigals. and indemnity and insurance provisiorrs salisfactory to tlniversir!. Additionalll', any license will include a reservalion ol.rights lbr University to use the lntellectual Property Rights fbr research. tcaching and other larvful purposes ol' the tlniversity, Notrvilhstanding anything in this Agreenrent to the contrary. this Agreemenl shall only require the Parties lo negotiale in good laith to anempl t() enter into a license, and shall not require either Party to enter into such a liccnsc unless the tenns and conditions for such license art' salislactury to such Pirrly in its sole discretion. Sponsor's Negotiation Right shall. for lntcllcctual Properw disclosed by University to Sponsor under Section 5.16.8. es.tend t'or one lrundrcd eighty days (lE0) days after such disclosure (the "Ncgotiation Period"), Sponsor shall lrave upon exercise of its Negotiation Right, one hundred eighry ( 180) da-ys to negotiate the terms of thc liccnse. rvhich period can be extendc.d by nrutual written agreement of the Parties. ln the event lhat Sponsor does not esercise its Negotiation Right as to any disclosed lnvention or lntellt'clual Prtrpcrty within the Ncgotiation Period or the parties fail to reach a rrrutuallv acct'ptable license agreement within the above specitied time period: (i) Sponsor's Negotiation Ri-eht shall end: and (ii) University shall be entitled Io negotiatr-' in good laith with one or morc third parties an exclusive or nonexclusive licr.nse 1o the lntellectual Property in its sole discretion. 5. 16. l0 University. afler due consultation rvith Sponsor. slrall plornptll, file and prosecutc patent applicalions on University lntellectual Propcrry to rvhich Sponsor exercised its Negotiation Right during the Negotialion Pr'riod. using counsel of Llniversity's choice. Because Universiq, and Sponsor have a common lL'gal interesl in the prosecution of such applications. University shall kecp Sponsor advised as to all developments rvith respecl to application(s) and shall prornptly supply copies of all papers received and flled in c:onnection *'ith thr.'prosecution in sufficient tinre tbr Sponsor to comment. Sponsor underslands and agrccs tlrat such exchange of informatlon may include privileged inlorrnation and that h-v such an exchange in lurtherance of the colnmon interests of thc panies, the Llniversity does not intend to rvaive the attorney/client privilege. attorney \ryork product immunity. common interest privilcgc. andlol any ollrer applicable privilege. protection, or imnruniry. Sponsor's comrnenls shall bc tilhcn inlo consideration. Sponsor shall rcimburse University for all reiuonable tlut-ol'- pocket costs incurred in conneclion with such preparation, filing. and prosecution 8 Avista Conrrao R-a l00l (OSP No. 7l7E) of patent(s). Sponsor shall be re-sponsible for all such costs under this Scctiun until Sponsor notitles Llniversity in rvriting that Sponsor desires to discontinue its financial support; provided, hou,ever. Sponsor shall also lre responsible [or all costs incurred by Universig,aflcrthe tlete of notice under this Section rnd which are reasonabl,v related to Sponsor's prior guitlance lo Unir,ersit1,, 5.l6.ll Within nine (9) months of the liling date of a U.S. patent application. Sponsor shall provide tu University a written list of forr,.ign countries in rvhich applications should be l'iled. Sponsor slrall provide University advance furrding for all lbreign applications/tilings. If Sponsor elects to discontinuc financial suppofl of any patent proseculion, in anv country. Universiry shall be lice to continue prosecution at t.lniversity's expense. ln such event. Llniversity shall have no l-urther obligation to Sponsor in regard to such patent applications or pBtenls. -i.l6.ll University. subjc'ct to its Copyright policy. hereby grants to Sponsor a non- exclusive. royalty-free, non-sub-licenseable license to usc' Copyrighted Material to which University holds the Copyright. with the exception of copyrighted software (which shall be licensed in accordance with Section 5.16.9 above). lbr its intemal. non-commercial use. 5. l6.ll Sponsor understands that Universit-y must comply with the provisions of LiS Patenl larv. including the Bayh-Dole Act. 5.16.l4 No Pany shall invoke the CREATE ACT (Cooperative Reseirrch antl 'l"echnology Enhancement Act ol' 200.1 and subsequenl anrendments and irlplcnrenling regulations) without written consent of the other Parry. -i. l7 lndemniw and Hold Harmless. Sponsor shall fully irrdcnrnit-v and hold harmless the state of ldaho. Universit,v and its governing board, officers. employees. and agents from and against any and all costs. losses, danrages. liabilities, expenses. demands. and judgments. including court costs and reasonablc aftorney's lees, rvhich may arise out of Sponsor's activities under or related to this Agreement and Sponsor's negligcnt corrduct. Additionalty. Sponsor shall tully indemnifl, and hold harmless thc state of ldaho, Universitl and its goveming board. oftrcers. employees, and agents lrorrr and against any nnd all costs. losses. damages. liabilities, expenses. demands. and .f udgments, including court costs and reasonablc attomey's fees, which rnay arise out ol Sponsor's use, conrmr'rcialization. or distribution of information. materials or products which result in rvhole or in part from the research performed pu$uant to this Agreernent. provided. holvever. that Sponsor shall not indemnifu University for any claims resulting directly lrom University's lack of orvnership or inliingement of 6 third-parry's intellcctual propertv rights. ln tlre event that any such loss is caused by the negligence of both Partics, including their cmployecs. agents. suppliers and subcontractors. the lcss shall be borne by tlre Parties in tltc proportion that their respective negligence bears to the total nc'gligencc causing thc loss: provided. horvever, that any loss bome by the University shall in an.v cvent onll' be to the extent allowed by ldaho larv, including, rvithout linritation. the lirnits of liabiliry specilied in ldaho Code 6-901 through 6-929. knorvn as thc" Idaho Tort Clainrs Act, 5.18 Amendments. This Agreenrent may be amended by mutual aqreement of the l'anies. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each ofthe Parties. I Arista Contract R-4 1002 (OSP No. 7378) 5.lS Assiqnment. The rvork to be provided under this Agreemr'nt. and uny clainr arising hr..rcunder, is not assignable or delegable by either Pany in rvholc or in part. rlithout the express prir:r rvritten consenl of the other Parry. except as required by'ldaho lalv. policy r:r regulatiott. 5.10 Notices. Aly notice or conrnrunication required or pernritted under this Agreement shall be delivered in person. by overnight courier. or by registerr"'d or ce'rril'ied mail, postage prcpaid and addressed to the Party to receive such nolice at the address given below or such other address as muy herealter be designated by notice in rvriting. Nr:tice given hercundcr shall be elfective as ofthe date ofreceipt ofsuch notice: University: Namel'fith:: Contract Otllcer Phone: (208) 426-l+15 Address: l9l0 Llniversity Drive Ciry/State/Zip: Boisc, ID 837?5- I I i5 h,-mai I : sponsoredagreenrents(Dboisestate.edu Sponsor: Name/Title: Randy Cnaedinger Phone: 509-495-2047 Address: l4l I E. Mission Ave. Citv/State/Zip: Spokane, WA 99?20 E-mai I : rand-v.gnaedinger@avistacorp.conl j.l r Coverning Law: Jurisdiction and Venue: Atlorneys' Fees. This Agreemenl shall be constmed and interpreted in accordance lvith the larvs of tlrc statr' o[ ldalro. rvitlrout regard to its choice of law provisions. Any legal proceeding instituted betrvec'n thc panies slrall be in the courts of the Counry of Ada. State of ldaho. and r.raclr of'the parlies agrces to submit to the jurisdiction of such courts. ln the evr'nt zury lcgal aclion is comnrenced to construe, interpret or enlorce this Agrer.'ment. the prevalling Party shall be cntitled to an arvard against the non-prevailing Party for all of'thc prevailing Party's reasonable attonreys'fees. costs and expenses incurred in such actioll. including anv appeals. 5.ll Courpliance tvith Larvs. Sponsor understands that Urtiversity and Sponsor arc subject to Llnited States laws and federal rcgulations. including the export ol'technology (i.c'.. technical data and technical assistance). computer softrvare. laboraton, prototypes and oilrgr commodities (including the Anns Expon Control ,.\ct. ns amcncled, the Esport r\dnrinistration Act of 1979 and associaled implu'mentirrg rr.'gulatiorts and exr-'cutivc orders). and that Sponsor's and University's otrligations hereunder are conlingent upon compliance with applicable United Statcs larvs and regulations. including thosc lbr c"\port ct-rntrol. The transl'er of cerrain tcchnology and commodities. even rvithin the bordcrs ol' the Llnited Slates. nray require a license from a cognizant agencv of thc' Llnited States Govemrnent and/or a wrinen assurance by Sponsor tlrat Sponsor shall nol translcr technology. soft'rvare or commodities to certain foreign p€rsons or couutries lvithout prior approvul of an appropriate agency of the United Statr.'s Govl'rnrnent. Neither Univc:rsity nor Sponsor represert thal a lir:ense shall not be required. nor that. if rr'quired. it will be issued. 5.li S.qve:abilitv. lf any provision of this Agreement or any provision ol any docutnenl incorporated by reference shall be held invalid, such invalidiry shall not affb{t thc other l0 r\vista Contract R-.1 I 002 ( OSP No. 7278 ) provisions of this Agreement which can begiven effect without the invalid provision, if such remainder conforms to the requirements of applicable law and the fundamental purpose of this Agreement, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are declared to be severable. 5.24 No Joint Ventwe. Nothing @ntained in this Agreement shall be construcd as creating a joint venture, pannership, or agency relationship between the panies, 5.25 Force Maieure. Any prevention, delay or stoppage due to strikes, lockouts, labor disputes, acts of God, inability to obtain labor or materials or reasonable substrtutes therefore, governmental reslrictions, govefilmental regulations, governmental controls, enemy or hostile governmental action, civil commotion, fire or other casualry, and other causes beyond the reasonable control of the Party obligated to perform (except for financial ability), shall excuse the performance, sxcept for the payment of money, by such Party for a period equal to any such prevention, delay or stoppage. 5.2'7 Delegation and Subcontracting. University shall not (by contract, operation of law or otherwise) delegate or subcontract performanca of any seryices to any other person or entity without the prior wril:eo consettt of Sponsor. Any such delegation or subconlractlng without Sponsor's prior written consent will be voidable at Sponsor's option. No delegation or subcontracting of perforrrance of any of the services, with or without Sponsor's prior written consent, will relieve University of its responsibiliry ro perform the services in accordance with this Ag:eement. 5.26 Entire Aereement: Order qf Slecedencc. Tlus Agreement contairrs all tlre terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. No other understandings, oral or othenwisq regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exrst or to bind any of the Parties herelo. ln the event of an incorcisiency in this Agreement, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date set forth herein by their duly authorized representatives. 1. 2. 3. 4. University BOISE STATE LINWERSITY Sponsor AVISTA CORPOP.ATION By:By Name: Title: Date: Ex tve Name: ?itle: Date; r(rrcst rlt n ]f tor ,r " -?s-\b 1l Avista Contrafl R-41002 (OSP No. 7278) Applicable statutes and regulations; Terms and Conditions contained in the Agreement; Any attachments or addendums; and fuiy other provisions rncorporated by relerence or otherwise into th.is Agreement. Budget Categgries ATTACHMENT r\ - BUDCE'I' UNIV I]RSIl'Y PROPOS AL # 72'78 Mths Total Salaries Pl Dr. Said Ahmed-Zaid Summer Co-Pl John Stubban lAsst Rsrch ProQ Fringe Benefits Pl Dr. Said Ahmed-Zaid Summer Co-PlJohn Stubban o&E Desktop Computer Parts & supplies for hardware prototype Total O&E Travel Domestic Travel Total Travel Total Direct Costs Base for lndirect Calculation lndirect Costs (F&A) 40,5% MTDC On-Campus Research Total Costs 1.00 1? otlo 35o/o 32o/o 5 c 9,917 40,003 $49,920 3,47't 1?.801 $16,272 1.000 $1,000 70.392 70,392 38,509 98.901 q ( $ 1,900s 1,300-5------160- $ S $ $ t2 Avista Contract R-.{ 1002 (OSP No. 7278) ATTACHMENT A - SCOPE OF WORK TINI\IERSITT' PROPOSAL # 7278 lDorumenl Conutenc'et rnt lhe N*t Pugc.J l3 :\v isla Contract R-4 1002 (OSP No. 727E ) OPERATION AND CONTROL OF DIS'TRIBUTED RESIDENTIAL STATIC VAR COMPENSA'TORS Attnchment A INSTITIITION Boise State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS Said Ahmed-Zaid. PhD, PE and John Stubban. PhD. l'l: PROJECT 0B"LECTIVES Develop the tianrework and simulation platfornrs to allorv tbr distributed control algorithnr tests ol'the Resitlcntial Static VAR Compensator (RSVC). Specitic simulation objectivcs are : o Voltage control. o Porver tactor control. e Multi-RSVC interaction. r RSVC interaction with voltagc regulators. battery energy storege systerns. photl'rvoltaic generation. and pre-existing capacitor banks. r Conscrvation by voltage reduction (CVR). o RSVC simulation comparison to field n'reasurement data. PERIOD OF PIRfOIWIA|{CE etlt20l6 to 8/311?017 RESOURCE COMMITMENTS PITOJECT PLAN 'fhis purpose ol' this proposal is lor the Boise State University team to provide engineering research and services for Phase lV o[ the ongoing project of a Residential Static VAR Compensator (RSVC). l4 Avista Contract R-41002 (OSP No. 7278) Pcrsornel Yo Effort Nlonths Comments Said Ahmed-Zaid |%I Project oversight. John Stubban 409,1 t2 Project ovcrsight and production stall-. A ndrr"is Valdepefi a Delgado As needed PhD student antl production statl'. Ta.s/t l.' l'nlec't Management (Pe$brned throughout projct't) Proiect managcment rvill be pertbrmed b1,the principal investigator team ol'Dr. r\hmed-Zaid and Dr. Stuhban.'[hey will lead the project tsanl to efficient and timely conrpletion ol'work through the provisions of rvell planned. rvell-scheduled and nranaged research and scrvices such irs: ldenti$ risks. anticipate problenrs. and quickly implement plan rcsolutions to minirnize impacts on thc project, Nlonitor the effort expended in the devetopment of project delivcrables. Define and implcnrr-nt specil'ic requirements lor project scheduling. staffing. and quality. Monitor the pro.iect for deviatit'rns tronr the established scopc: identifi,and quantif-r" changes requested by Avista be lare proceeding with the rvork. Other :a.sks: Conduct weekly internal project coordinatit'rn mectings to producc good conrmunications and clcar undcrstanding of scope. schedules. budgets. technical issues, coordination of interrelated tasks and near term deliverables. Participate in biweekly conference calls with Avista to update study and research progress. Prepare an agenda lor the confcrence call using thc tenrplate provided by Avista. Address work conrpleted during dre cunent period and work expected to be performed during the next period. Highlight items rcquiring resolution by Avista and the BSU research project team. Tusk 2: Otttu.'lcqui.sitiun ancl Datahsse Preparation (hy Oc'tober l, J0l6) The following data will bc requested from Avista to perfomr the studies tbr thc RSVC rcscarch project: . Suitabl,' distrihution capacilor ancl surrounding connectivity to cquivalencc for a transie nt sn,itching study. o PowerWorld simulation database snd corresponding dynarnic parameter files of the Avista area. o Distribution fbeder aux files of don,ntown Spokane and other suitable study areas to augment the Avista area case for dynamic simulations. Il- dynamic parameters are not available for distribution feeders. generic models will be used with oversight by Avista. o Fk:urly load prolile data of requested stud-v area. r5 Avista Contract R-41002 (OSP lio.7278) Isslr -1.' R.SIt' D),nuntic Simulation (b), Decernher l, 2016) 'l'hc RSVC dynamic simulation will consist of threc steps.'l'hc'frrst w'ill be to dcvclop the closed It'rop dynamic control for the RSVC using MATLABlSimulink rvith thc Sirnscape Porver Sl,stems'l'oolbox. This task rvill build upon the open loop control of the currcnt RSV(' prototypc by adding a rnorL- sophisticated control scheme for voltage and power factor control. 'Ihe second step will consist of dcveloping a simulation capable generic SVC nxrdel using the parameters developed in step one. Thc SVC nrodel will usc as reference the llPRl SVSM0I or similar rnodel to allow fbr compatihility across difterent simulators. This rnodel rvill bc tcsted using the PowerWorld dynamic simulator. Tests will include voltage and power thctor control. and any debug required for qualiry* essurance. A comparison will be made benvc'en the dvnnrnic perlbrnrance of the RSVC in PorverWorld and MAl'l.AB, taking into considcration that PowerWorld is a positive seguence only sirnulator. 'l'he third step will consist of testing the RSVC in a simulation environment nrodeling its intcndcd deployment. This step will simulate the dynamic intr.'raction bctween the RSVC and the tollorving powcr systr'm elements using PovverWorld rvith a suitable dynamic datalrase such as the SAG 741 Avista distribution feeder. The power svstL'nr r-'lemcnts tested lor intr.'raction with the RSVC may include: : Multiple RSVCs. r Voltage rcgulators. . Automatically switched shunt dcvices. r Banery energy storage system (BESS). r Photovoltaic distributed generation at the residential or light commercial lcvcl. r Translormer LTC switching (if simulation tinre scale applicable). Tusk4: Ellbct ol'li.t'l'(r on E"ristingCctpctcilorTrunsient SrlrTcAixg Study {hv !l.lu1, l" 30171 '[his analysis will evaluate thc effect of the RSVC on existing capacitor slvitclring transients. This pro.iect task will include rcsearch on the RSVC's ability to reduce harmonics and voltage tlicker on existing capacitor switching events using ATP or MATLAB/Simulink and Simscape Power Systems transient rnalysis softwaru-. Simulations will includc'an inrush analysis witl": l6 Avistq Contract R-l1002 (OSP No. 727E) cilpacitor switching and prc'viously energized capacitor switching. outrush due to a lhult cvcnt. and transient rccovery volta-ee. Ias/t 5; ftSl/i|,tl'.-lr Sr:u und Voltuge (lontol algtrithm tlevelopmetrt (h1' lllcry l, 3Ul7) Devclop a set ol'algorithnrs for RSVC placement and sizing for residcntial and light commercial RSVC deplol'ment. Develop a strategy tor both voltage and porver l'actor operation modr to be implenrented in the deploycd RSVCs. Test the devr,'loped algorithrns for residential and Iight commercial u.sing OpenDSS to quantity the lrencfrts by using conservation hy voltagc reduction (cvR). Tusk 6: Hurtlv,ure Prototvpe Developmettt (hy Augutt 31. 2017) Continue developing and testing the RSVC hardware prototypc. Test a first-generation RSVC prototype in an open-loop configuration in the laboratory first andlor in a residential setting. -Iims-perrnitting. add and tune an automatic control loop for voltage regulation. Tusk 7: Drqft Report (h1t,4ugust l, 2017) Compile a draft rcporl to include an exccutive summary. methodology. clata. assumption. analysis and conclusions. Prepare and submit the drafi report to Avista by enrail or a sccurc llle shnrr.' sitc. l'he draft report r,vill be delivered to Avista for their revicrv and commcnts, IasA ll.' Deli'rer.linal report tnd presenl resu//,r at Avi.\to heac{quarters (hl,Augtst 31.l0l7) lrepare and subrnit thc hnal report to incorporate Avista comments ox the drall reporl. Prepare a presentation to be given onsite at Avista headquarters. Deliver thr' final report to Avista via cmail 0r fl secure file shure sitr'. Background ln distribution nelworks. when the voltage at a bus falls below a reference value. reactivc power is injected into the s)'stcm by the RSVC to raise thc voltage. Wlren the bus voltage heconres higher than the relerencc value, reactive powsr is absorbed by thc RSVC tu lorver thc' bus voltagc. lnstead of using conventional methods of shunt compensation. such as static banks r-rfl shrnt inductors and shunt capacitors connected to the secondary of the distribulion transfbrnrcr. RSVCs are smart devices rvlrich can be more flexiblc and more powerful tools lor load t7 Avisla Contrast R-41002 (OSP No. 727E) manegement, These devices are built based on the concept of a single-phasc Statlc VAR compensator (SVC) and they implement conservation by voltage reduction (CVR) to regulate and reduce thc energy consuntption during peak demand hor.rrs. l'herefore, the RSVC dcvice helps to oprimize the voltage level dl,namically via a sophisticatc'd snrart grid technology to continuously reduce the energy consumption during pcak hours. The abilitl' to control thc ['low of reactive porver continuously in both directions gives the RSVCs tlre potential to f'latten thL- voltagc and hence increase the benefits of CVR by lorvering the voltage unittrnnly in the t'ct'der. Previous Work Phase t of this proje'ct consisted of a study model of a residential static VAR Conrpensator (RSVC) for regulating residential voltages. The srudies from Plrase I showed that a singlc-plrase RSVC oflers a signiticant potential tbr energy savings by v,rltage regulation and can lreconre a valuable tool to assist with energy efliciency, especially during peak demand hours. Phase ll olthis project consisted of building an opcn loop control prototype ol'thc RSVC device. 1'hc implem€ntation strategy involved a soltware centcred approach that used an FP(iA in conjunction rvith bidirectional switchcs. The bidirectional srvitches were madl' ol'l!{OSFEl's and controlled using a state machine to provide a snrooth transition between states. Phase III of this project consisted of perlbrming a tinte-series simulation over nrultiple months using a model developed in OpenDSS of downtown Spokane and a rural t'eeder near l.ake Pend Oreille. The simulations showed that the rieployrnent ol'RSVC could enharrce CVR h1, llattcning the voltage profi!e along the feeder. This allorved the voltage at the feeder head to be reduccd. which maximized the benefits of CVR. A cost-benefit analysis was alst'r perlbnned showing that deplol,nrcnt of the RSVC could be econonrically leasible. POTENTIAL MARKET PATH 'l'hc' potential market path oI Lhe residential static var compensator (RSVC) heing built and simulated in this project is similar to that of other shunt-connected. reaclive-injection-based devices currently being deployed b.v somc utilities, An RSVC prototypc is heing tesled in hardware at Boise State Universitv for a voltage control application {Consr,'rvation by Voltage Reduction) on the consumer sidc ol'the distribution feeder. 'l'he single-phasc RSVC dcvice has l8 :\vista f-'ontnrct R-{1002 (OSP No.7?78) the advantage over conventional shunt capacitors ol'being able to operate in a capacitive or inductivc mode without generating large undesirable harmonics. The RSVC's harmonic lootprint are not rypical of nrost thyristor-based SVCs currently deployed. The RSVC uses a novcl pulse rvidth modulation (PWM) scheme to create the variable VAR conrpensation. which pushcs the RSVC harmonics into a higher frequency band. 'l-his snlart device can be used in multiple applientions suclr as continuous voltagc ccntro! at a load point. polver tactor eontrol. nritigation cl porvcr quality issues. etc. The benefits of the nrass deployment of RSVCs on thr- consumer side ol' distribution networks will be demonstrated througlr a nuntber of sinrulation studies proposed in this project. 'Ihe nerv RSVC device has the potential to disrupt other competitor' devices on three fronts: cost, power quality, and smart-grid applicability or compatibility. CRITERIA FOR MEASURING SUCCESS 'lirere arc tlrrec major criteria for success: l. '[hc dynamic simulations will show that the control algorithrns will not destabilize the power system. and will validalc the control algorithms devc"loped for the RSVC. Dcpending on the research results. the RSVC may also be capable ol activc'ly reducing the voltage srvings during dl,namic cvents. and improve the power systcm perlbrmance. Dc'liverables for the dynarnic analysis will be the SVSM0I generic model parameters. and sirnulation results o[ the control svstem interaction befr,"een the RSVC and other power system elenrents. 2. Thc nrathematical algorithnrs lor RSVC placenrent and control will show incrcased conservation by'voltage reduction rvith a number of aggregate devices. Dcliverables fbr the placement and control rvill be a methodology on horv to apply the algorithnr to any {beder and simulation results of the algorithm applied to one of Avista's keder. 3. T'he capacitor transient slvitching study will show that the RSVC does not produce unw'antcd transients and is able to darnp out voltage transients. Depending on the research, the RSVC may also be capable of improving the existing s,v-stcm pr)wer quality. Deliverables will include tlre results of the inrush. outrush and transient recovery voltage simulutions. 4. A rvorking RSVC prototype tested in an open-loop configuration (and possibly in an automatic closed-loop configuration) in the laboratory will be demonstratetl to Avista ('orporation. t9 Avista Contraqt R-4 1002 (OSP No. 7?78) APPUNDIX A: Proposal Covcr Shect ;\PP}INDIX C: Facilitics untl Equipment Boise State []niversity is one of thrce state-supported research active universities in the state nf ldaho. Foundetl in I9l2 as Boise Collcgc'. it has experienced rapid gronth. particularly in thc last l5 years. ln that tinre it has establishecl itsell as an acconrplishcd rcsearch universily. norv oftering ! doetoral dcgrees and research expenditures on the order ol$35Miyear. Boise Statc's Olficc of Sponsored Programs has a well-trained support staff to handle contracting. accounting, compliance and reporting related tasks. 20 Avista Contract R-41002 (OSP No. 72781 APPENDIX D University of ldaho Agreements frwsta PROJECT TASK ORDER for SERVICES Master Agreement No.Task Order No.Modification No.Modification Date MA, Ul/Aw.sfa R-39872 166/.7 This Task Order is made and entered into this 14s day of July 2016, by and between Avista Corporation, herein called SPONSOR, and the Regents of the University of ldaho, herein called UNIVERSITY. The Task Order describes aclivates to be conducted by UNIVERSIry for SPONSOR. Any deviation from the work outlined in this Task Order and Attachment A must first be approved in writing by SPONSOR. ln addition. work performed under this Task Order is subject to the provisions of the Master Services Agreement. The Master Agreement, and this Task Order and Attachment A constitute the entire agreement for the WorU Services applicable under this Task Order. The terms and conditions of this Task Order may not be modified or amended without the express written agreement of both parties. Title of Seruices: Downtown Spokane Micro-Grid Start Date: 08/15t2016 Duraton (number of months) 12 months Estimated completion date: 08114t2017 UI PI: Herbert Hess SPONSOR Representative Consideration and Payment: Ul agrees to perform the Services set forth in Attachment A, Scope of Services, and SPONSOR agrees to pay for said Services in accordance listed as budgeted amounts upon performance by Ul. The obligation and rights of the parties to this Task Order shall be subject to and govemed by terms and conditions of this Task Order and the Master Agreement. Fundlng Amount (3): (Per Attachment A, Budget) $86,179.61 Progress Report Date: Final Report Date: 0813112017 Deliverables: lN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands on the day and year first written above: Ul Representative Signature Agency Representative Signature fuah,t&r*/ Deborah Shaver, Director Date: Heather Rosentrater VP Date: vR 07l18/16 Attachment A Dow ntown Spokane Micro-grid Universiry of ldaho Principal lnvestigalor: Herbert L. Hess Co-Principal Investigator: Brian K. Johnson Total Amount Requested: 586. I 79.62 Objective The scope of this research is to perform studies to determine how to establish a microgrid under emergency conditions in downtown Spokane. Our goal is to create a practical plan to invesligate and employ a master controller to establish the microgrid, to manage the inclusion of generation. enerry storage, and critical loads in a set of anticipated scenarios. Advantage to the ratepayers will be measured through maintaining critical loads for public safety and system reliability and security and improved recovery from emergency situations. Resource Commitment and Student Involvement Resource commitments for this project include the following:o Pl and co-Pl research time, up to25o/o commitment as normal academic duties.r One graduate student as a funded Research Assistant to analyze existing data from Avista. develop models and conduct simulations uing them. and determine the best course of action to take.o One undergraduate student as a funded Research Assistant to work on a subset of the model development and to perform simulalions.r Laptop computer equipment and software. This is a simulation study. Details are contained in the Budget and Budget Justification. This project involves students in every part of the research: project definition. modeling of the system and its components. creating the simuladon studies, analyzing the results of those simulations. and making recommendations for means to further investigate and implement discoveries. We have employed a team like this on a number of projects of similar scope and purpose in the past. Studens are all rnajoring in Electrical Engineering with an expectation to concentrate in Electrical Power Engineering. Having a sponsor like Avista as the recipient of deliverables enhances student performance greatly. We have realized a great deal of success from teams of this composition and its combination of technical competence and multiple levels of seniority and experience. Technical Approach When the balance between the total generation and load is disturbed. some loads may not be served and outages occur. This imbalance can be caused due to severe weather conditions, failure of the generating equipment, or failure of transmission facility. While outages are not desirable and jeopardize system reliability. some have more advene consequences than others. To minimize these adverse impacts on customers and to prevent these outages causing further chaos, critical /oads. such as hospitals and prisons. must be supplied unintemrpted power during system outages. One solution to this problem is to design and operate a local ,l,/icrosrrd based on Avista's downtown hydroelectric generation capabilities and upon proposed energy storage. A microgrid is a small-scale power grid that can serve local loads with or without connection to the utility grid. Over the past year. Avista has acquired a robust model of downtown Spokane through this university partnership. It now remains to use this model to understand how to create a microgrid and to activate and manage its operation. Important tasks in this research include idartifying sinrations in which establishing a downtown microgrid is the best option, creating an organizing such a microgrid, allocating resources, and managing the microgrid for unintem.rpted operation. l. ldentify conditions appropriate to establishing a downtown microgrid. Verifr loss of transmission feeders. Establish conditions that require activation of plans for a microgrid, When these conditions appear, activate the planned microgrid.2. Create and organize such a microgrid. Bring down the downtown grid and set priorities for bringing up generation, storage. and critical loads. Bring up these resources in a logical sequence. loading down the system appropriate, Establish and veriff protection methods of resources and loads.3. Allocate resources. The available generation and load profile is in the model that was created this year. Propose appropriate energ/ storage and verifu its effectiveness, Establish load prioritization within the microgrid. Create algorithms that can reallocate resources to maintain mariimum service and guarantee stability. 4. Ensure unintemrpted operation. Develop strategies for actively managing the microgrid. including load shedding and load pickup. engaging generation and energy storage, and terminating the microgrid when emergency conditions end. Use Avista's demand response system to track the microgrid's performance and to optimize use of resources in real time. Avista@ has expressed interest in making this happen among many of their customers. This project follows on from the creation of the models necessary to understand how to create, assemble. and rnanage a downtown microgrid. With the acquisition of these models, Avista wants to research possible microgrid scenarios as a planning measure. Continuing the project for a second year to create and test these scenarios has been encouraged by Avista engineers when we contacted them. With the windstorm of November 2015, Avista's management is all the more interested in lhis concept and has said so in our discussions with them. Task l: Design and Test a Downtown Micmsrid with its Master Control Unit The incumbent microgrid project under this same program provides a model of the proposed downtown microgrid. This proposed second year of this project will address several issues encountered when organizing, implementing, and operating such a microgrid. Reliability, security, and simplicity of setup are key in small scale power systems, such as this proposed microgrid. To create and operate the microgrid, computer-based control system must be incorporued. It would provide the means to quickly communicate necessary setup and operating controlto the microgrid's elements. Such a master controller would consist of a central processing unit and several extemal monitoring units. The monitoring units would be positioned at each critical location feeding the master with data about current conditions. Tluough these monitoring units. the master would constantly monitor lhe external grid and determine if tlre microgrid should be implemented. Once implemented, the master controller would detennine which loads will be included based on the limited amount of generation. Then the master controller would rcgulate the microgrid. controlling entry and exit of loads and operating the microgrid until a decision is made to terminate the microgrid when Avista's grid is restored. the microgrid no longer being needed- Many Microgrid Control Units (MCUs) to serve as master controller are available as microgrid technologt and research advances. These systems vary in amount of computing power, available UO interfaces, functional subsystems and commurication systems. An entire microgrid control system will require several subsystems based on the microgrid's generation souncesr storage capabilities, require load management, and protection. To determine the optimal control system for the microgrid several products will be compared, incorporating appropriate research advances on microgrid control in the course of the project. To establish the downtown microgrid, the MCU identifies the existence of a situation wherein Avista's grid may not provide sufficient power for the downtown load. To assemble the microgrid, there are two options: either to shed all load except the loads that become the downtown microgrid or to shed all load and then immediately restore those loads that will comprise the downtown microgrid. Issues such as establishing and maintaining stability, maximizing the load that becomes part of the microgrid given available generation, and when to pick up or shed load in response to generation changing due to water flow or the availability of any available renewable enerry. This research will determine which option is best, how to implement that option, and why that proposed path is best. Management ofthe microgrid will proceed as per established procedures on how a grid should be managed. Priority of loads will be established by Avista policy and implemented by the microgrid controller. Priorities will be based on historical data and its known seasonal and periodic variations and on possible renewable energy additions to the downtown generation mix and on proposed additions to enerry storage. This research will provide input to establishing and maintaining those load priority policies in light of available generation and enerry storage. Typical scenarios will be developed to refine the policies and to program them into the microgrid master controller. These scenarios will then be simulated to engage the microgrid and to determine its performance under anticipated conditions and inputs. Recommendations for refining the microgrid will be made from the results of these simulations and tests. Task ?: lnterface to distributed eeneration and to storage (.Proposed senior desim project) Distributed generation (DG) can enhance a downtown microgrid, easing generation requirements. DC peneration with additional generation sources and energr storage provides the possibility of more enerry rcsources. ln reality there are technical limits on the degree to which distributed generation can be connected, especially for some intermittent forms of renewable generation within the unknowns of a downtown microgrid. Investigating the possibility of incorporating such resources will be the subject of a senior design project Increasing DG penetration consists of a combination of generation sources, loads and eners/ storage, interfaced tlrough fast acting power electronics. This combination of units is connected to the microgrid at appropriate points to enhance the capability to provide electrical power near point of use. Key issues for the micro grid are those of system stability (power flow, voltage control, and system prCItection) during establishment, operation, and termination of the microgrid. The question to be solved is what reasonable combination of renewables and enerry storage would enhance the feasibility and the capability of a downtown microgrid under emergency conditions. Senior desigrt students will be presented with this problem and asked to propose such a system and then prove that the desired advantages are present They will assess the costs and issues that must be addressed in further detail as well. Task 3: Automatic generator control (Ongoing senior desiBn project) In an electric power system, automatic generation control (ACC) is a system for adjusting the power output of multiple generators at different power plants. in response to conditions within the microgrid. This automatic generator control would be a key part for the Spokane microgrid because a large share of their generation is hydroelectric. There are tluee primary aspects of this project:r Creating a model for the generators at hand. Currently. such models are incomplete. This will require that the students develop a framework for such a model and identiff shortcomings. They will then find appropriate ways to remedy the shortcomings, whether through finding missing or inadequate parameter specification for the generators, for example, or for making reasonable estimates based on good judgment. Creation of model for generatorsr Control of reactive power: From the generator and system models, the students will develop algorithms to control reactive power. Voltage stability within the microgrid will be the goal. A set of scenarios will test the algorithms and provide recommendations for improvement. r Control of real power: this is frequency stability within the microgrid. Again. students will develop algorithms to control generation and load. Frequency will be the indicator. A set of scenarios will test the algorithms and provide recommendations for improvement. This is an ongoing senior design project, started at the halfuay point of the cunent (and fint) year of the microgrid project. Project Planl. ln coordination with Avista engineers. identifr conditions appropriate to establishing a downtorvn microgrid. Select a master controller to organize, establish and monitor such a downtown microgrid. 2- Develop strategi€s for actively managing the microgrid. Set priorities for establishing the downtown microgrid: bringing up generation, storage. and critical loads. Establish and verify security and protection methods of resources and loads. 3. Simulate the microgrid under several anticipated scenarios. Create algorithms that can reallocate resources to maintain maximum service and guarantee stability. Simulate Avista's demand response system to track the microgrid's performance and to optimize use of resources in real time. 4. Test generationn storage, and load prioritization within the microgrid. Report the results of these tests and provide recommendations tbr establishing and operating such a microgrid and on how to further advance plans for a downtown microgrid. 5. Incorporate results from two senior design projects into the generation, storage, and load management of the microgrid. Senior design projects enhance the number of students who are involved with the project while incurring minimal or no additional cost. Potentisl Market Path This project develops the underlying engineering of a study of a downtown microgrid solution that provides an organized response to emergency conditions within downlown Spokane. Results from this project rvill determine where to proceed with this technologr. lf the technologl appears to become feasible and in what time horizon, then recommendations for developing it further will be tnade. Reduced scale hardware studies will follow, creating and analyzing performance of such a microgrid on the Analog Model Power System at the University of ldaho. lf that shows promise. engaging energy developrnent resources. for example through US Depafiment of Enerry or State innovation and enrepreneurial funding would follow. Creating a business plan would be appropriate at that point in the development process. when nearing completion of such follow-on projects. Deliverables to Measure Project Success The deliverables for success in this project will include the following documentation of prcdictions of microgrid performance:o Organize a downtown microgrid based upon Avista priorities o Select and program a master controller to establish and operate such a microgrido Determine response in simulation to appropriate scenarios that would be presented to such a microgrid.o Develop further plans for advancing a microgrid concept in downtown Spokane within slr years. r ldenti& the cost advantages to ratepayers of implementing this microgrid within a six-year time rvindow. Proposal Exceptions Per section 5.2 of the RFP, the Universiry has described exceptions to RFP requirements and conditions in the letter dated 4/15/16 and included with Appendix A. Expense Year I A PUFaculty Salaries $4,362.15 B PUFaculty Benelits (http://www.uidaho.edu/osp/fr ingebenefi tstabIe)$1,356.63 c StudenU Post Doc / Grad / Undergrad Salaries $37,424.00 D Student /Post Doc /Grad / Undergrad Benefits (ZVo=academ ic year; 7 .4o/o= summer)$ r.556.32 E Student /Post Doc lGrad /Undergrad Tuition & Insurance s10,429.78 F lH Salaries G lH Benefits (<20 hrs week/9%) H Equipment/Computers $5,000.00 I Supplies - Background check s300.00 )Travel $400.00 K Evaluation Costs s0.00 L Modilied Total Direct Cost (A, B, C, D. F-K)s50,399.09 50.30% F&A / Overhead (https:/iwww.uidaho.edu/research/facu lty/resources/f-and-a-rates)$2s,3s0.74 M Direct Cost + F&A 525,2a9.83 Total amount of Request (M + f)s86,179.61 Budget Justification Pl/Faculty Salaries: 2% of salary to administer project and mentor students Pl/Faculty Benefits: University faculty fringe benefit rate is 3 l.l0%. Student fringe benefit rate is 2% in the academic year and 7u.40Yo summer. Student Salaries: One graduate student paid at the rate of $21.00 per hou for 780 hours (nominal 20 hours per week) during the academic year and 440 hours (nominal 40 hours per week) during the summer. One undergraduate student paid at the rate of $ 12.00 per hour for 468 hours (nominal I 2 hours per week) during the academic year and 440 hours (nominal 40 hours per week) during the summer. Student benefits: %. Student fringe benefit rate is 2% in the academic year and 7u.40o/o summer. Tuition and insurance: Academic year graduate student in-state tuition per student at the rate of $8468.66 and health insurance at the rate of $ I 96 I . I 2. Summer health insurance is included in the payment for spring semester. EquipmenVcomputers: Computer hardware and software to perform simulations as required to obtain the project's del iverables. Supplies: Background check of each student and professor as required by univenity policy. Any money not spent on background checks may be spent as student or faculty salaries and benefis. Travel: Two trips to Avista in Spokane to present results and to consult with Avista engineers and management. F&A / Overhead: Assessed at the rate o150.3% of project direct costs except tuition. PROJECT TASK ORDER for SERVIGES Master Agreement No.Task Order No.Modification No.Modification Date MA, Ul/Avrsta R-39872 16636 This Task Order is made and entered into this 14th day of July 2016, by and between Avista Corporation, herein called SPONSOR, and the Regents of the Universig of ldaho, herein called UNIVERSIW. The Task Order describes activates to be conducted by UNIVERSITY for SPONSOR. Any deviation from the work outlined in this Task Order and Attachment A must first be approved in writing by SPONSOR. ln addition, work performed under this Task Order is subject to the provisions of the Master Services Agreement. The Master Agreement, and this Task Order and Attachment A constitute the entire agreement for the WorU Services applicable under this Task Order. The terms and conditions of this Task Order may not be modified or amended without the express written agreement of both Darties. Title of Services: "CAES Water/Energy Conservation Analysis with Avista" Start Date: 08-1s-2016 Duration (number of monthr) 12 Estimated completion date: o8-14-2017 UI PI: Richard Christensen SPONSOR Representative: Heather Rosentrater Consideration and Payment: Ul agrees to perform the Services set forth in Attachment A, Scope of Services, and SPONSOR agrees to pay for said Services listed as budgeted amounts upon performance by Ul. The obligation and rights of the parties to this Task Order shall be subject to and govemed by terms and conditions of this Task Order and the Master Agreement. Funding Amount ($): (PerAttachmantA, Budget) $93,354.55 Deliverables: Progress Report Date: Final Report Date: 0813112017 Other: TX lN WTNESS \ ftlEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands on the day and year first written above: U I Representative Signature tb*,th tlr*tDeborah Shaver, Diiector OSP Date: Heather Rosentrater VP Date: vR 07.18.16 Attachment A CAES Water/Energy Conservation Analysis with Avista l. Name of ldaho Institution: The University of ldaho (Ul), Idaho Falls Campus. 1776 Science Center Drive. Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 2. Name of nrincioal investieator: Dr. Richard N. Christensen 3. Proiect Obiective and Totsl Amount Reouested: The University of Idaho (Ul) and ldaho National Laboratory through their partnership with the Center for Advanced Enerry Studies (CAES) rvill work collaboratively with one carefully selected member of the Northwest Food Processors Association (NWFPA) to do a combination of process modeling and systemdynamic modeling of their operation. The goal is to identifl and create plars for implementation of new technologies that would significantly reduce their energr and water consumption. Because of the nature of the enerry use in food processing (heating. often followed by cooling), new technologies have the potential to substantially reduce the energy and water use by some customers. This will be accomplished by meeting the following objectives: o Analyze the enerry water footprint of the plant within a food processing plant using Aspen HYSYS process modeling soflware. o Characterize the energr and water consumption, identifying entering and exiting streams and lhose areas where improvements can be made. . Apply new and innovative techniques for water and enerry conservation at the specific points in the plant where the potential for savings is the greatest. r Evaluate the impact of these new technologies on enerry and water use within the plant. r Perform an economic and sociaal evaluation of the impact of these new technologies, and e Develop an integrated modeling approach that will allow stakeholders to collaboratively develop and analyze nerv water and energy strategies for food processing plants. The amount requested for this proposal is $93J5.1.34. {. Resource Commitments: Dr. Richard N. Cluistensen: 6! hrs for project management and student mentoring Dr. Karen Humes: 20 hrs for project numagement and review Dr. Michael McKellar: Through a separate collaboration with CAES. Dr. McKellar will mentor a student for 40 hrs in the use of Aspen HYSYS at no cost to the sponsor Mr. Jacob Jacobson: 65 hts for student mentoring in societal and economic evaluations 1 Two gradtrate students (GRAs): 1032 hrs each for a total of 2064 hrs. Ul rvill provide ruition and fees (-Sl E,000) for these two students from other sources. One GRA on Aspen HYSYS modeling, and one GRA on engineering, societal and economic evaluations of potential solutions 5. Specilic Proiect Plan lntroduction The growing demand on enerry and water supplies jeopardize the delicate balance between food production and, eneryy and water use (FEW). Food processing is one of the largest consumers of water and energl in the Pacific Northwest. Because of this, the Northwest Food Processors Association (NWFPA) has a goal for its 450 members to reduce enerry consumption 50% by 2030. Savings to date has been accomplished by making simple and obvious changes. However, improvements have significantly fallen offin the last few years as it becomes more difficult to identi$ additional savings. The NWFPA recognizes that in order to reach this goal. they will need to employ special technologies such as combined heat and power (CHP), renewable enerry methods, new methods for heating and cooling. However, it is not well understood how those technologies will impact other areas of the enerry-water spectrum. Therefore, a preliminary analysis will be done to evaluate the engineering, as well as the societal and economic consequences of any proposed methods. We hypothesize that active management through advanced modeling and visualization techniques, will lead to better oulcomes in the face of growing water scarcity and the recognized need to reduce enerry consumption. These techniques will enhance decision maliers' ability to make better and more informed decisions related to managing energy and water use in these complex systems. Approach We will work with Avista and NWFPA to identif, one NWFPA member company most suitable for investigation, based on a number offactors, such as: a) Their energy use and type of operations, with emphasis placed on companies with operations represenlative of other NWFPA members (in order that this demonstration be relevant for as many NWFPA members as possible ) b) Location in geographic areas in which Avista may have specific targets for demand reduction, due to transmission capacity or other issues The outcome will be a mathematical model and process or methodolog that will allow users to test different development strategies for a particular plant or set of plants and visualize the short-term as well as long-term impacts to energ/ and water consumption, GHG emissions and socio-economic impacs. The overall goal of this study is to examine the integrated management options for long-tenn water and energy resource management through the integration of new technologies and practices within the food 2 processing industry to reduce overall dernand and impact on eners/ and water. The approach will be to couple detailed process modeling of food processing facilities with a systems model thal can assess both short-term and long-term impacts to the overall system perflormance and include socio-economic components in the analysis. Tltis initial project will select one food processing company within the Avista geographic transmission area. However, the end goal is to develop a model and methodolory that can be used in a large number of the NWFPA membership companies. Modeling Effort A process model for one NWFPA member company will be developed using ASPEN HYSYS process modeling software. The first stage of modeling will be the given design of the companies' processes which will include pressures, temperaturcs, flows, and fluid compositions throughout the process. lncluded in this stage will be sizing of the equipment throughout the plant or plants. The second stage is to analyze the existing model to identify areas where the energy could be more efficiently used. To do this. an enerry analyses is performed to identiff available work throughout the processes and to find areas where larye losses of this available work occur. This will focus efforts on components that have the largest lost work to find \vays to improve energi utilization, Examples of improvements in enerry usage could include more ellicient heat exchangers, better piping and component insulation, process heat recuperation, exergy boosting, enerry use in a different order or new substitute technologies. The models may be used to reduce water usage through simulation of better water recovery syslems, water puri$ing technologies. and process heating or cooling using alternative methuis. A critical part of the modeling effort is to analyze the economics of modified prouesses. By considering the economics of the modifications, the processes may be optimized to economically reduce ener5/, increase production, and reduce water usage. Prcccss Modeling Sofhryare APSEN HYSYS process modeling software provides basic components such as pumps, compressors. turbines, piping, chemical columns. chemical reactors, valves, heat exchangers and others to simulate thermal and/or chemical processes. The software uses a large database of thermodynamic, fluid. and thermal properties for a wide variety of gases, liquids. and solids. I-IYSYS ensures correct mass and energy balances as well as ways to simulate components that are not a standard part of the software. The component simulations are detailed enough to size and provide initial design parameters. Discussion of Possible Process Modifications tn 2015. Bonneville Power Authority published the Enerry Efliciency Technolory Roadmap (James V. Hillegas-Eiting 2015).' We will quote widely from this document in the following section, specifically from Volume 7: Industrial Food Processing and from Volume 8: Combined Heat and Power. 3 Areas we would evaluate with respect to actual food processing include: sterilization and pasteurization based on microwave or ultrasonics (V7, p4), equipment needed to upgrade heat content in waste stream to higher more useful temperature ranges (V7. p6), use of multistage CO2NH3 cascaded refrigeration for low temperature freezing (less than -25C) (V7. p8), use of more energy intensive mechanical cooling rather than absorption cooling when waste heat is available at an appropriate temperature (V7, pl0), an increased focus on HVAC within the plants (Y7, p26), use of real time energr monitoring hardware. Also, where it would be placed and what equipment would be used (V7. p28), determine when and where it might be possible to use smart electriciry management systems tbr food processing and self-correcting energy management systems based on known inputs(V7. p34). Areas we would evaluate with respect to combined heat and power are taken from Volume E and include: use of organic Rankine cycle and Kalina cycle to recover ener6/ from low and moderate temperature waste heat streams (V8. p2), use of Stirling Engines for very high temperature waste enerry streams (V8. p4), use of industrial mechanical and absorption devices to recover latent and sensible heat from exhausts up to 400F, (V8, p8), use of the dynamic models developed to determine the optimal combination of CHP generators, combined cooling, heating and electric power generators, thermal storage, cooling storage and electrical storage (VE, pl4), microwave drying of wet biomass and higher temperature gasifie(V8, p l8), application of higher Coefficient of Performance (COP) absorption chillers and chillers that are able to convert process heat to freezing (V8, p22). investigate possibility of using low grade heat ( 140-200F) gas trom boiler or water from the cooling tower to make electricity (V8, p36), use a thermally driven heat pump to raise lower temperature water lo a useable temperature (V8,p36), use a cunent program to integrate CHP. process. and low heat temperalure recovery (V8. p36) ln summary, we find the following quote from V8. p32 most interesting: "Find analysts capable to perform full analysis of an operating plant for optimum effective energy use: integrate CHP, maximize other process heat recovery, utilize low temperature heat by new technologies to enable CHP by improving economics and to avoid elecricity use by direct thermal drive from waste heat." This is *actly u,hat we propose lo do herein. Socio-Economic Analysis There is an economic advantage to reducing enerry consumption within a processing plant. However, it is important lo recognize that there are more than economic measures forjudging improvements within a complex system. Improvements in energy consumptions cannot be taken al the sake of the environment. If so, any improvemenls will most likely be shortJived as the environmenlal impacts in the long term may reduce economic retums. Addifionally. it is important for any solutions to be socially acceptable. 4 'Ihis project will develop a dynamic analysis of key system performance indicators similar to the Balanced Score Card (BSC) approach used by many organizations (Kaplan and Norton. 1992)2. The concept of balance central to this system specifically relates to (Niveu 2002)3: r Balance between financial and non-financial measures. r Balance between internal and extemal constituents of the organizations. r Balance between lag and lead indicators. However, the BSC approach has a number of deficiencies: one way cause and effea. does not consider tirne varying impacts, and no meehanism for validating the pertbrmance indicators. This project will go beyond the BSC approach and includes a system dynamics approach that looks at short-term versus long-term impacts while considering feedback rvithin the system, System dynamics also enables us to build formal computer simulations of complex systems and use them to leam about and design more effective management strategies (Sterman. 2000)3. This approach will analyze impacs of management decisions across a set of key metrics that take into account not only financial indicators but also intangibles (e.g.. customer satisfaction, business image. environmental impact.-.). The approach will be to worh with management to determine a key set of indicators that are deemed impactful, develop a visual mapping of the process and interactions, identifr time lags and feedback pnocesses, develop a dynamic balanced scorecard (DBSC) simulation model of the processes, validate strategies through the dynamic simulations, and deploy the dynamic balanced scorecard framework. Food processors in the Northwest are interested in active management solutions to water scarcity, setting production goals for enerry and water conservation, developing technolory to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. and improving resource efficiency. The DBSC work above focuses on in-plant analysis and efficiency improvements across a wide balance of key indicaton to assess technologies that would provide long- term and impacting improvements. 6. Potential Market Path: This project will result in two models that will allorv the quantification of enerry and water savings potential and the evaluation of any risks or deleterious effects of the recommended enerry and water saving measures. In a second year. if funding is available, the collaboration will verifu the methodologt by application to two otlrer NWFPA members. If the verification is successful, the collaboration will establish a fee schedule for the evaluation pnocess and market the methodologr to all NWFPA members. Once established in the Northwest region, the collaboration would make these services available to the country nationwide. 7. Criteria for measurins succ6s: This project will be a success if the tbllowing occur: 5 . An ASPEN-HYSYS model on one NWFPA plant is completed and used to evaluate enerry and water usage. This model will be a deliverable included in the final report. r Viable altematives are suggesled and modeled that save l0% to 20 % of energy and water usage. e No extemal deleterious effects are identified for the alternative suggested above. o A methodolory is delineated that allows the application of the models used to other plants within the NWFPA. This methodolog will be a deliverable included in the final report. r A Final Report is generated that documents all findings. Budeet Anticinated Exoenditures #hrs $/hr 8. Total PUStudents Faculty - Christensen-Richard Faculty - Summer, Christensen Temp Help - Jacobson Faculty - Humes, Karen Grad Student MS (AY) 2 Students Grad Student PhD - Summer 2 Students Fringe Benefit Cost and o/o PUFaculry (AY) PI/Faculty (Summer) Staff Grad Studenr - AY Grad Student - Summer Equipment- I computer Travel Humes to ldaho Falls from Moscow 3-days 2 nighs Hurnes, Christensen, Jacobson, Portland 3{ays, 2 nights 42 20 65 20 I 560 s04 3l.lo/o 31.1% 40.9Yo 2.0% 2.0% $80. r 3 $80. r 3 $45.00 $75.94 $19.6r sl9.6t $3,365 $ I,603 s2.92s $1,519 $30.s92 $9,883 sl,sre $498 sr,r96 s6l2 $198 s2.300 s1.302 s4,600 0.503 $62,1 l2 $3t,242.34 TOTAL $93,35.1.3,1 9, Proposal Exceptions Per section 5.2 of the RFP. The University has described exceptions to RFP requirements and conditions in the letter dated 4/l5l16 and included with Appendix A. The letter rvill be included by the Ul Office of Corporate and Foundation Relations for the submission. References: l. James V. Hillegas-Eiting, Ed., Energt EficiencyTechnologt Roadmap,BPA Technolory lnnovation, 2015.2. Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, Harvard Business Review. January-February 1992.J. Paul R. Niven, Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results. Wiley. October 2002. 5 Total Direct Costs lndirect Cost 50.3% 4. J.D. Sterman, Business Dynamics System Thinkng and Modellingfor a Complex l{orld, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston, Mass, USA, 2000. Letters of support and a flow chart for the proposed work can be found at: http : //www. u idaho.edu/i dahofal I s/caes/logic-diagram 7 PROJECT TASK ORDER for SERVICES Master Aqreement No.Task Order No.Modification No.Modification Date MA, Ul/Avisfa R-39872 1 6643 This Task Order is made and entered into this 15 day of July, by and between Avista Corporation, herein called SPONSOR, and the Regents of the University of ldaho, herein called UNIVERSITY. The Task Order describes activates to be conducted by UNIVERSITY for SPONSOR. Any deviation from the work outlined in this Task Order and Attachment A must first be approved in writing by SPONSOR. ln addition, work performed under this Task Order is subject to the provisions of the Master Services Agreement. The Master Agreement, and this Task Order and Attachment A constitute the entire agreement for the Work/ Services applicable under this Task Order. The terms and conditions of this Task Order may not be modified or amended without the express written aqreement of both parties. Title of Services: Using Reduced-Order-Models for Simulation-Based Commissioning of Buildings Start Date: 08-01-2016 Duration (number of months) 13 Estimated completion date: 08-31-2017 UI P!: Elizabeth Cooper SPO NSOR Representative: Heather Rosentrater Consideration and Payment: Ul agrees to perform the Services set forth in Attachment A, Scope of Services, and SPONSOR agrees to pay for said Services listed as budgeted amounts upon performance by Ul. The obligation and rights of the parties to this Task'Order shall be subject to and governed by terms and conditions of this Task Order and the Master Agreement. Funding Amount ($): (Per Attachment A, Budget) $64,230.00 Deliverables:trN Progress Report Date: Final Report Date: 8-31-2017l-l other: lN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands on the day and year first written above: U I Representative Signature Age n cv Representative Si g natu re hl.:201607.15 I5i6S{7m Deborah Shaver, Director OSP Date: Ogit ltsEnd t hbah N.SB Deborah N. Shave f ffirdsPndP,qnc,turn;bv@&b.do Heather Rosentrater VP Date: vR 07.15.16 Attachment A Name of Idaho public institution: University of Idaho Name of principal investigator directing the project; PI: Elizabeth Cooper Co-PI: Dr. Jinchao Yuan Project Title - Objective - Amount Requested Using Reduced-Order-Models for Simulation-Based Commissioning of Buildings Project objective and total amount requested Amount Requested: $64,230 Objective Optimal controls are essential for building efficiency. However, because every building and control system is unique, it can be a challenge to analyze and tune these controls on a large scale. Using energy models to commission a building is one way to quickly identify errors and correct controls. This virtual controller commissioning can save significant amounts of energy and money. The research proposed herein would streamline this method and increase its market potential. In 2015, through funding from Avista's Energy Research (AER) Initiative, the IDL performed a virrual control commissioning for part of the HVAC system at a building on the University of Idaho campus. The research on the economizer setting at the College of Business and Economics (COBE) building revealed areas for optimization. Simulation results indicated a potential savings of 240 MWh per year for this one building alone. Were this approach expanded to the campus level, it could result in an annual savings of 7,200 MWh. This proposal will build upon this past research on advisement from Avista and try to adapt the method so that it is more amenable to commercial applications. Under past funding from Avista, the team has already created a detailed energy model of the COBE building and established communication pathways between the energy modeling software and the building control hardware. This enabled the team to run remote hardware-in-theJoop simulations to identify savings opportunities and estimate energy reductions. The continuation of this research would move this technology forward in two important ways: by performing a physical demonstration at the site, and by simplifl,ing the modeling process. A physical implementation of virtual commissioning would greatly add to the commercial case for this technology. The second component of this research is in response to feedback from Avista from the 2015 work. The aim is to simpliff fully detailed building models to reduced-order thermal models that could then be used to tune the building controls. The past research relied on specific building models in EnergyPlus. While these models are suitable for academic study, they are less practical for commercial applications because of the time and expense of building a detailed energy model of the building, and are difficult to scale up. Moving this method towards a more general software platform and modeling method would widen its appeal to the controls industry. The objectives of the overall project are to lower total building energy use, and reduce building start- up duration by employing a streamlined, simulation-based method for building commissioning. This service promotes efficiency and has the potential to be used in future curtailment strategies by enabling building controls to predict and respond to peak loads. Performing a physical implementation of virtual controller commissioning and pursuing research into simplification and scalability of this technique will advance this service towards commercialization and widespread adoption. Resource commitments, (number of individuals and possible hours for services): Personnel Hours estimate Description Dr. Jinchao Yuan, P.E.312 Provide overall management of the project and technical expertise Elizabeth Cooper 56 Provide project guidance, support publication plan and market path approach Post-doctoral Fellow 218 Provide technical support and technical expertise and execute daily tasks L. Damon Woods - PhD ME student 160 Provide technical support and execute daily tasks ofthis project TBD MS ME student 320 Execute daily tasks of this project Specific project plan This work will pick up from the 2015 analysis performed on the COBE building. The research team will begin by verifying the control sequence current operation of the building's HVAC system. Past work relied on "dummy" inputs to the remote controller. These were compared to data recorded by the building's Energy Management System (EMS). In order to bring the work up to the current building situation, the team will confer with the building facilities team and gather additional historical data from the EMS. This information will enable the researchers to verif! the current controls and determine a current baseline of the building's energy consumption prior to commissioning. IDL will work closely with the operators at the site to establish a communication pathway from the current controller at the site to the EnergyPlus software model that was created during the 2015 work. This physical implementation of the co-simulation at the site will feed a live stream of building conditions to the energy model allowing the research team to compare control decisions on a real-time basis instead of using RFP No. R-40884 Page 2 of 6 historical records and simulation estimates. Communication between the EMS and the energy model will be achieved by routing the EMS signals directly to a laptop with the energy model or by replicating the information on a stand-alone network to enable signal transfer. Work will involve syncing data transfer rates and sending analog outputs from the laptop containing the energy model. The project will then turn to breaking down the full EnergyPlus model into a reduced-order thermal model in a state-space format. A software from the Swiss University ETH called OpenBuild is designed specifically for this task. The team at IDL will try this method to convert the EnergyPlus specific model into a general mathematical model. While this method may be effective for structures that have current energy models, the main goal of the research is to make the modeling method faster and more general. Thus, the team will also pursue the parallel development of a state-space dynamic model of the COBE building simply through knowledge of the building's structure and an analysis of the field data. The final step will be to contrast the state-space model with the EnergyPlus model. Both models will be tested against historical and live data to ensure their responses are consistent. The team will then attempt to substitute the simpler mathematical model can be substituted for the complex EnergyPlus model and also be used for tuning the HVAC controls. The research team will document the process and establish a pathway for industry to develop and commercialize the service. The documentation will detail the methods and be pursued for publication as part of the thesis work of a master's student at the IDL. The project will be carried out in the following phases: Task 1 Proiect Planning and Reporting - Conduct team meetings and ongoing project updates, reports and deliverables as required by Avista staff, project management contractor and the PUC. Ongoing throughout the project. Task 2 Gather Baseline Data - The team will collect and process current and historical EMS and weather data at the site to establish a baseline in order to benchmark savings and veriff the current controls; I -2 months duration. Task 3 Establish Communication at the Site - Based upon work completed in2014-2015, the team would perform a physical implementation of the co-simulation at the site to establish live-data transfer between the EMS and the energy model; 3-4 months duration. Task 4 Simplify Detailed Enerev Models - This task involves converting the detailed EnergyPlus models into reduced-order thermal models and using these to tune building controls. This work can be performed in parallel with Task 3. Targeted sub-system monitoring to isolate impact of Task 3 will be conducted as needed and as budget allows; duration ofthe project. Task 5 Analyze Effectiveness of Reduced-Order Models - The team will contrast the accuracy of the reduced-order model compared to the EnergyPlus model. The analysis will include a study of sensitivity, variable requirements, and ease of signal communication relative to the EnergyPlus model. Task 6 Develop Workllow for Practitioners - The final tasks will be a study of the process that will add to the current literature and promote this technology service to further commercializationtechniques. This RFP No. R-40884 Page 3 of6 documentation will be part of a master's student's academic work and publication in a conference or journal will be sought. Potential market path The service of pre-commissioning building energy management systems could save substantial energy, increase occupant comfort, and greatly reduce the time between building start-up and proper operation. The building commissioning process has been shown to be highly cost-effective while also improving comfort and productivity (Mills, 2009). HVAC controls commissioning is very important because commercial buildings operated in an unintended manner have been shown to increase energy consumption by 20% compared to the intended design (Westphalen and Koszalinski, 1999). A recent baseline study of buildings in the Pacific Northwest found average office building annual energy use to be ll2 kBtu/ft2 with an average office building size of 20,000 ft2. (Baylon, et al., 2008). Given these assumptions, controls commissioning could save 131,200 kWh/yr for an average office building. The simulation results from the 2015 work showed a potential savings of 7,200 MWh for the University of Idaho campus. In addition to significant energy savings, simulation-based pre-commissioning of control systems can enhance existing commissioning efforts, reduce risk to owners, increase occupant comfort, and increase realization rates for energy savings from EMS. The many benefits of this technology have been limited by its tether to specific software platforms (EnergyPlus and BCVTB). The research proposed will help to move this service beyond a specific modeling software to a mathematical model that can be generated for any building based on climate, intemal loads and construction. This will vastly broaden the appeal of the virtual commissioning process to industry partners who may offer this as an energy-savings service to their clients. Controller manufacturers may advertise their products as pre-commissioned. Co-simulation will allow verification of control logic and has been shown to detect faults which were otherwise seen as impossible to predict in the design phase (Haves, Xu, 2007). They may also use the technology to virtually test new and innovative control systems without risks to building owners from unproven control logics. Virtually commissioning the system using a thermal model holds great promise in being able to test for missed energy savings or occupant discomfort as compared to the design intent. As the co-simulation adoption and applications grow, the technology allows either building managers or utility companies to provide short-term forecasts of the building behavior and load based on the thermal model and weather information. Commissioning based on an EnergyPlus building model has been shown to predict energy demand and correctly forecast shortfalls in the cooling capacity (Harmer, Henze, 2015). Utilities, building managers, or third-party-providers may embrace this approach as a curtailment strategy to predict and mitigate peak building loads automatically. Once the thermal model is created, and communication established with the EMS, the economic benefits of automation, fault detection, and prediction are immense. RFP No. R-40884 Page 4 of 6 It is the intent of this project team to develop a work-flow around this technology which will enable incentive programs, or other value-added energy services for utilities, or a third-party provider, to be developed which will improve the effectiveness of new building commissioning, existing building retro- commissioning, and promote new and innovative designs for high performance buildings. The market path may include a new utility incentive program or as a value-added energy service in a utility portfolio. Criteria for measuring success o Project team has coordinated with the building facilities team to gather relevant historical data at the site and established a method of weather data collection. o Project team has established a communication framework between the COBE building EMS and the energy model. o Project team has adapted the full EnergyPlus model into a reduced-order thermal model. o Project team has completed a comparative analysis of the two models and demonstrated a means to substitute the mathematical model for the EnergyPlus model. o Project team is able to present a replicable work flow which can be implemented into a pilot project incentive program or value-added energy service by a utility or third-party provider. Budget Price Sheet / Rate Schedule Expense Year I Pl/Faculty Salaries (Cooper and Yuan) Pl/Faculty Benefits (Cooper and Yuan) Postdoctoral Fellow Salaries Postdoctoral Fellow Benefi ts Graduate Student Salaries Graduate/Undergraduate Student Wages Student Benefits Graduate Student Tuition Remission (partial) Equipment/BAS Controller Travel F&A lOverhead (Excludes Tuition) Total $ 15,398 4,799 5,718 2,338 5,120 3,360 212 3,080 1,500 2,250 20.46s $ 64,230 RFP No. R-40884 Page 5 of6 Budget Justification ***All Hourly Rates are averages over FY16 and FY17 Salaries -Support Requested from Elizabeth Cooper at 56 hours ($51.28lhr), Jinchao Yuan at 312 hours ($40.15/hr), Post-Doctoral fellow at2l8 hours ($26.23lhr) and one graduate student at320 hours ($16.00/hr), and one graduate student at 160 hours ($21.00/hr) Fringe - Estimated based on the following rates: 3l.l% Faculty, 40.9% Post-doctoral Fellow, 2.5% Students (estimate since some hours will be complete in FY20l6) Tuition Remission - Estimated tuition costs for one graduate student for Fall of 2016 and Spring of 2017 $3,080 Equipment/Computers - Estimated for project period is $1,500 for new BAS controller Travel- Estimated travel expenses for project period $2,250, to include: (1) trip to Spokane for project kick- off; (2) trips to University of Idaho in Moscow for equipment installation and retrieval; (1) trip to Spokane for final presentation to Avista for PI's and graduate students. F&A/Overhead - IDL is considered an on-campus unit of the University of Idaho with a federally negotiated rute of 50.3Yo. Proposal exceptions: Per section 5.2 of the RIP, the University has described exceptions to RFP requirements and conditions in the letter dated 4115116 and included with Appendix A. References: Baylon, David., Robison, David., Kennedy, Mike. (2008)."Baseline Energ,t Use Index of the 2002-2004 Nonresidential Sector: Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington." Ecotope Haves, Philip., Xu, Peng,. (2007)."The Building Controls Virtual Test Bed - A Simulqtion Environmentfor Developing and Testing Control Algorithms, Strategies, and Systems." Proceedings: Building Simulation 2007. Harmer, L.C., Henze, G.P. (2015). "Using Calibrated Energy Models for Building Commissioning and Load Prediction." , Energ/ and Buildings 2015. Mills, Evan Ph.D. (2009). "Building Commissioning: A Golden Opportunity for Reducing Energy Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissiorrs." Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Report Prepared for: The Califurnia Energ,, Commission and Public Interest Energt Research (PIER). Westphalen, Detlef., Koszalinski, Scott. (2001). "Energy Consumption Characteristics of Commercial Building HVAC System, Volume I: Chillers, Refrigerant Compressors, and Heating Systems." Arthur D. Little, Inc. Report No. 36922-00 Xu, Peng., Haves, Philip., Dringer, Joe. (2004). "A Simulation-Based Testing and Training Environment for Building Controls" Published in the proceedings of SimBuild 2004.Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-s580I RFP No. R-40884 Page 6 of6 lYg/tsta APPENDIX E Final Report: RSVC Year 3 Confidential APPENDIX F Final Report: Micro Grid Phase 2 *ylsta : Universityotldaho AHwsrt College of Engineering Robust Microgrid for Downtown Spokane Project Duration: 12 months Project Cost: Total award: $86,179.61 OBJEGTIVE The main objective of this study is to continue the feasibility study for forming a microgrid in the downtown area of the city of Spokane, Washington, and consider how the design approach can be extended to other locations. The objective of creating a microgrid is to reduce the impact of major transmission outages on high priority loads without the need for major transmission upgrades to create an equivalent level of support. The main source of power for the microgrid is from the two existing hydroelectric generators located near the critical loads. As the power generated from the two run-of-the-river hydroelectric plants is not sufficient to supply the critical loads at all times of the year, the project evaluated options for supplementing this with photovoltaic aeneration, energy storage and for converting diesel backup generators to natural gas allowing them to run for longer periods. The project also developed and tested preliminary control schemes for load shedding and for charging/discharging the battery. BUSINESS VALUE The implementation of a microgrid in downtown Spokane potentially allows for a reduction of economic losses due to the sudden shutdown of equipment. For example,a sudden power shutdown for an industry could lead to the damage of production lines being developed. The microgrid will allow Avista to keep power on for critical loads in case of a blackout. The microgrid will also alleviate issues when restoring the grid after a blackout. The plan makes use of the existing infrastructure while adding minimal additional controls in order for forming a microgrid to create potential benefits. The costs associated with the failure to supply critical loads are significant, The microgrid has the potential to pay back costs in its operation. This is one ofthe reasons that microgrids are gaining importance in the power industry. The microgrids will provide an opportunity to reduce the outage related expenses. They include the demand side managed, distributed generation, and energy storage, each of which have benefits during normal operation. Additional operational benefits when the microgrid grid-connected during normal conditions include potential for improved energy efficiency, energy surety, greenhouse gasses emission reduction, and avoid cost of power interruptions for critical facilities in the microgrid. The results of the study on microgrid development for downtown Spokane can be applied in other areas of the Avista system or other utilities in the region or nation. The proximity of the generation resource close to the load centers has huge benefit in the reduction of transmission and distribution losses. BACKGROUND While the Spokane Microgrid is in the "island" mode, it suffers from a significant stability risk, as local generation is insufficient to supply all of the critical loads, let alone the entire load in the microgrid footprint. The previous year of this project evaluated this microgrid and determined its potential boundaries, identified critical loads and performed a preliminary study on potential addition of photovoltaic generation and energy storage. The project also identified areas that needed further study. Since the islanded microgrid will be supplied solely by renewable sources with seasonal or daily variations in availability (hydroelectric and solar photovoltaic), the variations in the generation can be compensated by installing electrical energy storage in the microgrid. This project estimated the power and energy ratings of an electrical energy storage system and identified potentials locations to place it based on electrical performance and available sites. After determining the available energy resources, a model of the Spokane downtown microgrid was developed and implemented in a real time digital simulator by acquiring the data from distribution and transmission system models available from Avista. An initial design for a microgrid controller we proposed and studied through simulation. Once the models were completed the next step was create a control system for loading shedding and battery control. During certain times of year, the power supply will equal demand, but for most of the year, there will be a deficit, and as a result, the lowest priority load will need to be shed. There are two efforts to alleviate the energy shortage. One method is load controlin the form of a master controller. This controller will receive data from multiple points in the system and shed the lower priority loads. Another method is increasing the amountof available local generation and adding energy storage. The new generation will be in the form of existing diesel generators at the hospitals, solar panels, and megawatt batteries. PROJECT SGOPE AND ANALYSIS Task 1: Microgrid location characterization This is an essential first step. It involves defining the electrical boundaries of the microgrid, identifying energy resources and critical loads, fetching the network data, and collection of historic load and energy resource data from Avista. Task 2: Creating a simulation model in a real time digitalsimulator From the information given by Avista a model of the microgrid was created in RSCAD, the graphical user interface for the real time digital simulator. The data given included: generator parameters, load profiles, transmission and distribution line parameters, and capacitor modeling. Then this data was used to create an accurate model of the microgrid, This task included identifying the feeders connecting the critical loads and identifying the best possible ways of supplying them with minimal loss. Also included in this task was model validation to ensure accurate results during simulation. Task 3: Creating a load shedding scheme Once the model was created in RSCAD the next step was to create a load shedding scheme. The purpose of this scheme is to shed a load when the available generation can't meet the demand of the microgrid area. The first step in creating the load shedding scheme was to determine a priority list for the loads. Determining this is important because scheme will shed the lowest priority load first in order to keep the system stable. The next step was to implement the load shedding scheme in RSCAD. This was done using a subset program of RSCAD called component builder, which utilizes C-code built into a component. The final step was to perform real time simulations to ensure the load shedding scheme performed the way it was intended to. Task 4: Battery control Depending on the time on day, generation may exceed demand or vice versa. Knowing this batteries can be installed on the system and used to optimize the system operation and possibly keep a load from having to be shed. UET batteries were selected because Avista already has one installed. A control system was designed and tested created to optimize the use of the batteries. The control for this was created using component builder in RSCAD as well. The first step was to get the battery to charge or discharge depending on voltage conditions across the system. The next step is to fine tune the discharge portion. The UET batteries have the capability to discharge max power or a short period of time or a lower power level over a longer period of time. The control will sense if batteries are needed and then make a decision how much power is needed and supply that amount. Task 4: Automation controller The next step was to begin implement of the control schemes using a commercialautomation controller. An automation controller can be built by combining automating logic and a Human-Machine Interface (HMI). A HMI allows the user to interact with a system. By using relays, detecting faults and tripping breakers can be done efficiently, Data can be transmitted and received throughout the microgrid systemusing a communication protocol called General Object-Oriented Substation Events (GOOSE). Task 6: Final Report Compile final report with the results from the studies as well as the models, proposed solutions and any upcoming technologies. DELIVERABLES The deliverables for this project will be: . Completed RSCAD model with analysis ofthe load shedding and battery control schemes. . Proposed work for future projects. o Analysis results and proposed ideas for the control and operation of the microgrid PROJEGT TEAM PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name Dr. Herbert Hess Organization University of Idaho Contact #(208) 88s-4341 Email hhess@uida ho.ed u GO.PRINGIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name Dr. Brian Johnson Organization University of Idaho Contact #(208) 88s-6902 Email bjoh nson@uida ho.edu RESEARGH ASSISTANTS Name Jordan Benjamin Scott Organization University of Idaho SGHEDULE Email Scot0330@va nda ls. u idaho. edu Name Lexi Turkenburg Organization University of Idaho Email Tu rk9655@vandals. uida ho.ed u Name Jacquelyn Dufau England Organization University of Idaho Email Duff4880@vandals.uidaho.edu Name Nathan Bliesner Organization University of Idaho Email Blie3945@vandals. uidaho.edu Name Maximilian Schnitker Organization University of Idaho Email Schn6884@vandals. uidaho.edu Name Christine Page Organization University of Idaho Email Page3114@vandals. uida ho.ed u Name Keegan Miley-Hunter Organization University of Idaho Email Mile7150@vandals. uidaho.edu TASK NAME Base Iine schedule Actual completion Master Controller Directive) (Main 8/22/2076 8/1/20t7 Small Scale Sub Project: Build a small scale model from a previous exampleto understand how to use and how a system operates in RTDS. 9/26/20t6 L2/7/20L6 Small Scale Example Model: Trip Breaker Learn how to trip breakers in RTDS and to understand the protection is developed for the Microgrid 9/26/2016 u30/20L7 Small Scale Example Model: Trip Breaker With Relay Understand how to create an interface with the microgrid in built in RTDS and the physical relays. As well as understand how to set the relay to open the breakers. 9/26/2076 7/7/2Ot7 RTDS Model Main Project 9/8/20L6 6/L/2Ot7 Load Shedding Scheme Control system using component builder in RSCAD to determine when the power system should shed and which load to shed first. 9/9/20t6 7 /30/2077 Battery Control 5/22/20t7 7/30/2077 The information contained in this document is proprietary and confidential Implement control system using component builder in RSCAD to determine when the batteries should charge and discharge, aswell as how much power to output when it discharges. I. EXEGUTIVE SUMMARY This study reports on the results from a feasibility study on establishing a microgrid in the city of Spokane. A microgrid is a portion of the main power grid that can be isolated from the rest of the grid under abnormal conditions. It can operate in both grid connected and islanded modes of operation. The study identified the available generation resources for the microgrid and identified critical loads based on their priority and the system topology. The potential amount solar energy generation within the footprint of the microgrid based available locations was estimated. A unified model of the microgrid was developed in Powerworld simulation software. This model was then used to validate a model of the system built in RSCAD. Once this was completed the control systems for load shedding and battery control were added. A study was then performed to ensure the control systems behaved as expected. This is demonstrated in the analysis and key results section below. In addition, a study was pertormed to determine the feasibility of adding battery storage, followed by determination of optimal locations, and rating of the potential battery storage systems. The microgrid has a very good potential to improve the resilience of the system since it is predominantly supplied by hydroelectric generation that is very close to the critical loads. !I. TECHNOLOGYUTILIZED . Powerworld Simulator version 19. . RSCAD 5.001.1 . SEL-451 Protection, Automation, and Bay Control Systems . SEL-3530 Real-Time Automation controller (RrAC) SEL-5033 AcSELerator RTAC software: used to configure the SEL-3530 Real-Time Automation Controller SEL-5032 AcSElerator Architect software: used to configure GOOSE communications SEL-5030 AcSElerator Quickset software: used to configure and commission the SEL-451 Protection, Automation, and Bay Control System III. ANALYSIS AND KEY RESULTS a. Electrical boundaries of the microgrid The substations that are closest to each of the critical loads were identified. The main substations to best supply the critical loads are: Post Street, Metro, College & Walnut and Third & Hatch. There are four main points of common coupling (PCCs) identified at these substations where breakers would be openedto form a microgrid. Figure 1 shows the transmission network with electrical boundaries of the microgrid identified. a a a I t.-j'.r..1 I -tl:l il Figure 1 Transmission network within the area of microgrid b. Renewable Energy Resources Within the region of the microgrid thereare two important renewable energy resources that can be utilized. Those are solar and hydroelectric energy. Figures 2 and3 below show the both the hydro and solar energy potential. It is observed that waterflow is low in: August, September, and October which is where the average solar energy is high. -6n -SII-_I"'*t rcBID^u 600,m :@.oo 46.@ tm.00 26.m !m 00 o.m E f Summer day IIIIIIINT:. ,.n f.b Ma. Apr Mrl tun tul Alt 5!p O<t iov DlL ,46 tt,A &m tuoMC)N T,l Figure 2 Monthly average river discharge from 1891 - 2016s: illlIIT.i:r.all I r"n Frb vi. Ap. Mry ,",l.rrl,, aut slp Oc tov [re( Figure 3 Solar radiation average in the city for 30 years c. Load and Generation profile Figure 4 shows the combined averagegeneration output profile over the representative 24-hour periods in each of the seasons. Figure 5 shows the comparison between the total load and total generationon a typical summer day. As the total generation is not sufficient to supply all of thecritical loads load shedding needs to be performed. The plot also shows the battery discharge profile. .,-t$i-$**$$S.$"i-i-t-*$1"$*t-$$$,$. Figure 5 Total load vs total generation on a summer day including load shedding and battery addition d. Load Shedding and battery control analysis From the analysis above it is observed that that demand exceeds generation during several parts of the day. Possible solutions include shedding additional loads or adding energy storage. Figure 6 shows the control logic for how the load shedding and battery control operates. t ! !. l t r a I t0uuattEIu!uuu]IE:a Hirotdt day -rdtu6 -rd&ndH +b6 _kuy Stan I0ft 5 r5 s ],.a" l0 Hoe cf $r dry -!{.6' -k crJt -BG Figure 4 Combined average generation output profile over 24-hour period in 4 seasons Figure 6 load shedding and battery control logic. e. Battery Size and potential Iocation for placement From the analysis it was shown that the difference between the power supply and demand can be stored or supplied with a properly sided and controlled battery energy The information contained in lhis document is propnetary and confidential D€la,Shed6n0 LoEL- lG;ffiF* Lo0rq9lo! Slate. storage system. This difference was taken into account when sizing the batteries. The battery was sized to have 2MW peak charge or discharge capacity. The battery needs to discharge for up to 6 hours and there needs a total energy rating of l2MWhr in the worst case. Table 1 summarizes the load profile analysis for each of the seasons. The voltage sensitivity at each bus in this microgrid was calculated to determine the best location for the battery. The bus that experienced the largest voltage sensitivity to changes in load conditions was chosen as the best location for battery in this study. Figure6 shows the percentage change of voltage taken on the ordinate and size of the step changes of load taken on abscissa. Based on these results, load 3 bus is most sensitive bus and an appropriate candidate location for a battery. Table 1 Summary of battery peak power requirement study IV. GONGLUSION The study identified the available generation resources, the critical loads based on Avista's priorities, and the microgrid system topology. Potential for solar energy generation within the area encompassed by the microgrid was estimated. A model was developed using a combination of Powerworld simulations software then transitioned into a real time simulator using RSCAD. As observed in the results, demand is often higher than the available generation. There are several options that can be applied to remedy the situation. Battery energy storage systems canbe added along with the corresponding control logic. At times this will be enough but in the cases where it isn't, a load shedding scheme can be implemented and will shed a specific order of loads when the correct conditions are met. The system performance can be improved by adding capacitors for voltage support and energy storage devicesfor real power support. The proposed microgrid has a very good potential to improve the overall resilience of the system. V. FUTURE WORK 1. A portion of the microgrid can be isolated as a nanogrid. The critical loads around substation 3 are rarely supplied within the microgrid due to their lower priority and lack of energy resources. If an additional solar installation is added, the area can potentially disconnect from microgrid to form a nanogrid. 6 s { m +a,qr.rB I -cnBM.a-c|@d, -ordda Figure 6 Percentage voltage change with respect to power As part of this project a senior design team explored options for converting some of the diesel backup generators at the hospitals to operate on natural gas. Since the natural gas supply to the Avista system is self-powered, a regional blackout will not interrupt power supply. The natural gas conversion will allow the hospitals to generate power for longer periods of time in the case of an extended outage. This also reduces the potential pollution from the diesel generators units. Having the hospitals able to supply more of their own critical load using these generatorswill enable the hydrogeneration and photovoltaic aeneration to supply other critical loads instead. The information contained in this document is proprietary and confidential Season Total critica! loads supplied Peak Deficit value Deficit duration MW Sta rt time End time Spring 7 1.78 2:00PM 7:00PM Summer 4 1.45 5:00PM 9:00PM Fall 6 0.6 4:00PM 4:59PM Winter 6 0 NA NA 2. Further analysis on the microgrid model can be performed such as, the economic benefit analysis, transient stability study using transient simulation software where modeling includes more realistic governor and exciter models to study potential control structures for the hydro generators. 3. The load shedding scheme currently in place will shed the same list of loads regardless of the time of day. This isn't the most efficient since depending on the time of day different loads have moreimpoftance. Further study into load shedding to implement this would be beneficial. The implementation of the load shedding scheme in the automation controller needs to be completed and tested. 4. The bi-directional power flow in the microgrid will be a challenge for protection. Potential modifications to allowa protection scheme to transition fromgrid connected to microgrid operation need to be developed and tested. 5. Right outside of the microgrid area is a waste energy plant that produces several MW of power that could be supplied to the downtown area during the operation of a microgrid. Utilizing this power could make it so very little load shedding would haveto be performed. A study to determine the feasibility of this would be beneficial. Note: Please refer to the Master's thesis document in Appendices A results. APPENDICES Appendix A: Master's Thesis Jordan B, Scott, Master's Thesis, Microgrid Operation with Load Shedding and Battery Control. University of Idaho, December 2OL7. The information contained in this document is proprielary and confidential Microgrid Operation With Load Shedding and Baffery Control A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science with a Major in Electrical Engineering in the College of Graduate Studies University of Idaho by Jordan Benjamin Scott Major Professor: Herbert L. Hess, Ph.D. Committee Members: Brian K. Johnson, Ph.D., John Crepeau, Ph.D. Department Administrator: Mohsen Guizani, Ph.D December 2017 ll Authorization to Submit Thesis This thesis of Jordan Scott, submitted for the degree of Master of Science with a major in Electrical Engineering and titled "Microgrid Operation With Load Shedding and Battery Control," has been reviewed in final form. Permission, as indicated by the signatures and dates given below, is now granted to submit f,rnal copies for approval to the College of Graduate Studies for approval. Major Professor:Date: Herbert L. Hess, Ph.D Brian K. Johnson Ph.D Date: John Crepeau, Ph.D Department Administrator: Mohsen Guizani, Ph.D Committee Members: Date: lu Abstract One of the goals of this thesis is to implement a load shedding scheme within a microgrid to drop the lowest priority load when demand is anticipated to become greater than the supply. Another goal is to implement a battery controller that communicates to the battery when to charge, when to discharge, and how much to charge or discharge. By doing this, critical loads could be kept online and will not have to be shed. This research project successfully designed and tested a load shedding scheme in a real time digital simulator to keep critical loads online, as well as adding a battery controller to help keep loads from being shed when possible. This controller includes commands such as when to charge, when to discharge, and how much to discharge. By doing these things a significant portion of the microgrid studied has been shown to continue to have power in the event of a blackout that could last anywhere from minutes to days, no matter what time of year the blackout occurs. IV Acknowledgements While working on my thesis I have had the great honor of working with some very amazingpeople whom I would like to thanks. I would like to thank both my advisor Dr. Herbert Hess and Dr. Brian Johnson for helping me with this project. Both of whom went above and beyond what was required. They spent many hours providing valuable knowledge and making sure I had the resources needed to make this project a success. They made working on this project enjoyable and for that I thank them. I had the honor of working with several undergraduate students during the course of my research, and without them I would not have been able to accomplish as much work as I did. Those students include: Jacquelyn England, Lexi Turkerburg, Christine Page, Maximilian Schnitker, Nathan Bliesner, and Keegan Miley-Hunter. Each of those students helped me accomplish various aspects of the project. Jacquelyn and Lexi helped me get the project going and did whatever task was asked of them. Both of them helped work on the load shedding and the HMI. Christine and Keegan ended up taking over the HMI and spent many hours getting it set up. Maximilian worked on the load shedding and helped develop a model for testing. Nathan took on a new task designing a controller for the batteries. Last of all I would like to thank my high school math teacher Mr. Keith Price. He taught engineering is more than math. He taught me learning math is just a stepping stone for building and designing various things, and to look for the fun in it. As a result he is one of the main reasons I am an engineer today. v Dedication q araqH hlep A dd,acare ilb uail to orq cM,akp lanlq, eu1 /atuuto fu dr4d /4,4dred dt ctlcll & ?/4q ohlata"a&l ar,rd?il/k, v1 Authorization to Submit Thesis ll Abstract llt Acknowledgements lv Dedication .........v Table of Contents vl List of Tables xilt Chapter 1 Load Shedding Introduction I 1.1 Background ... 1 1.2 Problem Statement ...1 1.3 Proposed Solution.....a...J Chapter 2 Liter ature Review 2.0 Micogrid Overview......5 ..5 ..5 ..7 2.1 Benehts of a Microgrid 2.2 Load Shedding.. 2.3 Battery Control 2.4 Diesel to Natural Gas Converters.........,7 ..8 ..9 2.5 Chapter 2 Summary Chapter 3 Design and Model Development Table of Contents vll 3.0 Load Shedding Definition.....9 3. I Undervoltage Parameters 9 3.2Initial Design l0 3.3 Chapter 3 Summary t2 Chapter 4 Software Development for Load Shedding Scheme 13 4.0 Software 13 4.1 RSCAD Implementation ....14 4.2Load Shedding Scheme in RSCAD.,..,14 4.3 Cbuilder in RSCAD ....14 4.4 Chapter 4 Summary ...16 Chapter 5 Controller Implementation in RSCAD t7 5.0 YO Ports of the Component... 5.1 Parameters of Component....1 8 5.2 Chapter 5 Summary ...20 Chapter 6 Simulink and RTDS Simulation Results of Load Shedding Scheme...................21 6.0 Simulation in Simulink .21 6.1 Simulating the Load Shedding Scheme in RSCAD .....22 6.2 Chapter 6 Summary ...27 Chapter 7 z Battery Controller .....29 7.1 Introduction........29 7 .2 Battery Model Introduction 7.3 Battery Controller in RSCAD..... 7 .4 Battery Controller Implementation in RSCAD 7 .5 Battery Power System Model Configuration in RSCAD 7.7 Implementation in Simulink 7.8 Simulation of Battery Controller in Simulink 7.9 Chapter 7 Summary..... Chapter 8: Diesel to Natural Gas Conversion Kits.. 8.0 Introduction to Diesel to Natural Gas Conversion . 8.1 Diesel to Natural Gas Conversion Kit..... 8.2 Conversion Kit Specifications. 8.3 Chapter 8 Summary........ Chapter 9: Automation Controller 9.0 Automation Controller Introduction. 9. 1 Hardware Development.... 9.2 Software Configuration ..... 9.3 Protection Relay 9.4 GOOSE Protocol Communications .... 9.5 The Human Machine lnterface.... vill .......3 I 32 ......45 .,,45 35 45 52 .46 46 ...48 ...48 ...48 ...49 ...49 51 9.6 Chapter 9 Summary 54 ?A lx Chapter 10 Summary of Accomplished Work and Future Work........55 10.0 Summary of Accomplished Work .55 References ......62 Appendix A: Truth Tables for Finite State Machine ...66 Appendix B: Next State and Output Logic Diagrams ...68 Appendix C: RSCAD Files....77 .h and .c fiIes....77 Appendix D: Battery Controller Coding....94 Appendix E: Battery Power System Coding.....99 Appendix F: Software and Hardware Used in Automation controller Development.103 10.1 Future Work: Transfer of Automation Logic to RTAC... ..............56 10.2 Future Work Time Based Load Shedding ...................56 10.3 Future Work Fully Implementing Load Shedding in RTDS Hardware in Loop Simulation ......................57 10.4 Battery Control Future Work........ .............57 10.5 Future Work on Diesel to Natural Gas Conversion......... ..............58 10.6 Future Work Communication Between an RTDS and Automation ControlIer.................58 10.7 Future Work Establishing GOOSE Protocol Communications for the RTAC..................60 x List of Figures Figure 1.1: Microgrid Area....2 Figure 1.2: Monthly Average Hydro Electric Generator Flow Rates [1]aJ Figure 1.3: Monthly Solar Cell Power Generation Potential [].J Figure 3.1: Load Shedding Scheme CFD......... Figure 3.2:Data Flow Diagram for Main Undervoltage System ........ Figure 4.1: Graphical Representation of Load Shedding Controller... .. 10 .. 11 .15 Figure 5.1: List of Inputs .. l8 Figure 5.2: List of Outputs Figure 5.3: List of Parameters .19 Figure 5.4: Overview of Available System Configurations Figure 6.1: Simulink Simulations All Loads Triggering.... 20 ...,.....,.2| Figure 6.2: Simulink Simulations Load Logic Resetting.....22 24 25 26 27 30 32 aaJJ 34 35 35 Figure 6.3: Load Shedding Interface Figure 6.4:Load Shedding Simulation 2 Bus Voltages Figure 6.5: Load Shedding Simulation 3 2 Loads Tripped..... Figure 6.6: Load Shedding Simulation 4 All but Highest Trip Figure 7.1: Battery Control Flow Diagram............. Figure 7 .2: Battery Controller Figure 7.3: Controller Inputs ........ Figure 7.4: Controller Outputs...... Figure 7.5 : Controller Parameters. Figure 7 .6: 2 Controller System.... xl Figure 7.7: Battery Model 36 Figure 7 .8: Battery Inputs 5t Figure 7 .9 : Battery Nodes....... Figure 7.10: Battery Parameters ............ Figure 7 .ll Battery Currents Figure 7 .12: Battery Monitored Values Figure 7.13: State Transition Diagram Figure 7 .14: Battery Controller in Simulink..... Figure 9.1: Hardware Implementation Scheme 5t 38 38 ....39 ....40 ...42 ..48 Figure 9.2 : Software Implementation Scheme ......49 Figure 9.3: Example of SEL Relay LED Alarm Light Protection. .... 50 Figure 9.4: HMI for One Breaker .................. 53 Figure 9.5: Bus Voltages and Line Currents for One Re1ay........ ...... 53 Figure 10.1: Combined Average Generation Output Profile Over a 24HrPeriod in 4 Seasons ......... 56 Figure 10.2: Editing Outputs in the SCD file 59 Figure 10.3: GTNET-GSE Output Parameters 60 Figure 10.4: Establishing GOOSE Protocol for the Relay Figure B.1: 52 Logic........ 6t 68 Figure B.2: Sl Logic.........69 Figure B.3: S0 Logic......... Figure B.4: Output Logic Load I .... Figure B.5: Output Logic Load2 .... 70 7l 72 x11 Figure 8.6: Output Logic Load 3 Figure B.7: Output Logic Load 4 Figure B.8: Output Logic Load 5 ..73 ..7 4 75 Figure C.1: Cbuilder.def File 77 xlll List of Tables Table 7.1: Output Transition Table 4t Table 7.2:Battery Controller Simulation Low Frequency Input. ...-..42 Table 7.3:Battery Controller Simulation High Frequency Input. .....43 Table 9.1 : Example of SEL Relay Breaker Trip Tag ...... 50 Table 9.2:Example of Establishing Alias Relay Ta9........... ............. 51 Table 9. 3: Example of HMI Relay Trigger Tag........... .................... 51 Table A. 1: State Transition Table With Encoding.......... ................. 66 Table A. 2: Output Table With Encoding 67 1 Chapter 1 Load Shedding Introduction 1.1 Background In the instant that a local or regional blackout occurs, power is lost. The duration of this loss can range from minutes to several days. To mitigate the effects of such a blackout on a regional utility, a microgrid has been designed to provide power and stability to critical facilities such as hospitals, jails, and government buildings. In an ideal microgrid, available generation, would always be greater than demand. In a situation where load exceeds generation load would have to be shed. As a result of this, in order to keep the microgrid operational, a scheme is needed to implement prioritized load shedding. 1.2 Problem Statement The proposed microgrid shown in Figure 1.1 will utilize two hydro-electric generation sites and solar power from within the micogrid. The available generation is often less than the total load in the microgrid footprint. These power sources are influenced by season variations and daily weather pattems and could fluctuate greatly in their generated power, voltage magnitude, and frequency (Figure 1.2 and 1.3) [1]. These figures only show the seasonal variation, not daily. Due to this potential for instability and due to mismatch between generation and loads, it is necessary to have a plan for immediate reductions in power consumption to maintain operational voltage to critical loads. MICROGRID AREA Srb6trtpn 4 t:.r. ltltt rirtv 2 2 ul lv tro 5001V lne tu 5-f tuhdirnS \i/e!t J[re 81, 9rb6trtbn 6 urv llw llrY Figure 1.1: Microgrid Area Another problem can occur if load reduction is not enough to maintain operational voltage and frequency to the critical loads. If the load is too small, generation can be reduced. If load is too large, generation can't supply all the loads. The next step from there is to shed load to keep the microgrid from becoming unstable and having a voltage collapse. The first load to be shed is the lowest priority load in the system. Once this first load has been shed, the load shedding scheme will determine if another load needs to be shed in turn in order to maintain stability. One of the other questions that arises from shedding the load is how long should the system wait before it sheds another load? If the load shedding scheme is initiated too soon, frequency and voltage oscillations could cause a false shedding command to be sent to one of the loads. The solution to this is to set sufficient time delay between load shedding commands so there is negligible chance of transients causing an error. A backup to this would be to set the load shedding controller such that a load has to be under a set voltage ]E grhetion 9 !H DS 9rhdbn5 !!r? t Jn, ltJtr $yiro !!enUqr I Itdro !!Enti)o fuhatron I grbstrlion 3 Arbstarton 70l{ ullr, t rll JF,< t -l I I I J threshold for a set amount of time before it sheds. The timing has to be set so that a load isn't shed if any of the bus voltages in the system merely fall below the set voltage momentarily, but also has to be set fast enough so that the system doesn't become unstable and suffer a blackout. Figure 1.2: Monthly Average Hydro Electric Generator Flow Rates [] Figure 1.3: Monthly Solar Cell Power Generation Potential [1] 1.3 Proposed Solution When the microgrid is in an island state, it will be responsible for providing power to the critical loads in the local area. The goal of this work is to develop a load shedding scheme when it isn't possible to supply all the loads in the microgrid. The load shedding 1.,lr,l/l &, Lr,a d,lr,FtL,:(J co:)(J 600.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 I DISCHARGE I r I I :T Nov Dec I. I:.7 AuB Sep OctJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun .lul MONTH 12 l0 I 6 4 2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May .lun Jul Aut Sep Oct Nov d d Oec I FI.AT PI.ATE t I-AX|S TRACT(II{G Iz.AXIS IRACKING _l _aa- t l-rn I t- 4 scheme will act to disconnect the lowest level priority loads to maintain the voltage magnitude. This load shedding scheme constantly measures voltage, and will trigger when a critical load's voltage magnitude drops below a preselected level for a preselected time, such as 0.90 per-unit for 5 seconds. Once an undervoltage event occurs, the system will identiff the prioritized critical load based on the information found from a past research project []. Once this identification has been made, the lowest priority load will be shed. Shedding load provides voltage, and frequency stability to the microgrid. As a result of the load shedding scheme constantly monitoring voltage, if shedding the first load is not enough to maintain acceptable voltage levels across the system, the load shedding scheme will initiate another load shed. This process will continue until voltages across the system are within an acceptable range. Once voltage is in this range, the load shedding scheme reverts to only monitoring voltages. This thesis covers a few main points. In detail, it defines what load shedding is and why it is needed. Following this is the the development of a load shedding scheme which includes logic diagrams and software development. Finally it shows the results of the load shedding scheme. In this microgrid load shedding is the last resort. One of the options to be checked before load is shed utilize the batteries that can supply power to the microgrid, and keep load from being shed. The objective of the energy storage model is to add the batteries and their energy storage control in the present microgrid model. The purpose of the battery controller is to evaluate the frequency of the system and send a signal to the battery to correct the frequency, as well as help with real power management. 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 2.0 Micogrid Overview Microgrids are power system configurations that give both economic and environmental benefits when compared to expanding legacy modern power systems. [15]. In other words, microgrids are power systems with power consumption located near generation such that the microgrid can become an independent entity, even controlled and dispatched separately [7]. Another useful aspect of a microgrid is that it can generate in both islanded and grid connected mode. In order to be able to do this, concepts such as load shedding and battery control need to be looked at in order to keep the system stable. 2.1 Benefits of a Microgrid Microgrids offer several potential benefits power utilities: 1. Reduce the carbon footprint by reduction in the use of conventional sources of energy if they are based on renewable energy generation [6]. 2. Lower operational costs by reducing the number and length of transmission and distribution lines [ 1 I ]. 3. Encouraging utilization of renewable energy sources [3]. 4. Supplemental power for peak loading, which in turn postpones upgrading the system [3 l]. 5. Improve system reliability [17]. 2.2Load, Shedding An advantage of local control is that it relies on local measurements, thus avoiding certain communication dependencies leading to jitter or delay. The communication architecture within the microgrid needs to be well established, so that it can be utilized 6 within the demand control applications. It is advisable to combine the central and local control schemes where fast and coordinated response is required [1]. Load shedding is performed in order to keep the frequency and voltage of the power system stable. The most economical way of improving system stability is to equalizethe generation to load (via load shedding or generator control), thereby minimizing the disturbance impact to the power system [12]. A simplified model of the microgrid in Figure 1.1 is implemented in Real Time Digital Simulator (RTDS) [1]. RTDS provides opportunity to perform hardware in loop simulations. It provides low level output signals, which resemble the real system data such as current transformer outputs or voltage transformer outputs. These outputs can be directed to intelligent electronic devices to perform protection or automation operations [ 1]. One of those operations is load shedding, which will shed load based on undervoltage conditions. A historical method for detecting power unbalances is to detect a decrease in power system voltages [3]. Once this detection has been made, and load shedding has been decided, a load shedding scheme will determine which load to shed. By doing this, voltage levels will be regulated to improve local reliability and stability [4]. One of the popular load shedding methods for a microgrid is implementing an undervoltage scheme. The Western Region of the Entergy System is located within Entergy Texas service area,utilizes this type of scheme 122]. Through design and testing it was found that this method would be sufficient. This load shedding scheme was put into service in June 2014 and as of mid 2015 no operational issues have been reportedl22]. 7 2.3 Battery Control By installing a battery energy storage system within a microgrid, power can be supplied to critical loads. There are also other pros of using batteries in a power system. A few of the advantages are savings in terms of reduced power bought during the peak hours, improving power quality in cases where variable renewable power sources are connected to the grid, and providing emergency power to critical loads []. In order to be efficient, battery sizing needs to be looked at. As stated in the previous paragraph, it is important to size the battery appropriately. Batteries can improve the balance between generation and demand, and thus, the baffery size will have signif,rcant impact on the grid's economic operation [1]. When sizing batteries for this system, the following rules were followed. Those rules include: operating considerations, design and aging margins, voltage window design, and charging and discharging limitations [18]. Once the size of the batteries has been calculated, the next thing to look at is placement. Optimally placed batteries can regulate the voltage throughout the power system, thus reducing the need to expand the current power system or to shed load. [19]. This thesis uses what was described in the previous paragraphs and implement a battery model and battery controller in Matlab Simulink. 2.4 Diesel to Natural Gas Converters Throughout the microgrid area, there are several diesel generators that can produce approximately 14.75 MW of power. Due to emission limits, these aren't a viable source of power for this microgrid. A dual fuel diesel engine is a diesel engine fitted with a dual fuel conversion kit to enable use of cleaner burning alternative fuel like compressed natural gas 8 in addition to oil [20]. Performance tests have shown that the emissions are significantly less when compared to the standard diesel generator [21]. This thesis will look into applying diesel to natural gas conversions within the microgrid area. One minor issue that can be encountered with diesel to natural gas converters are diesel is still needed to ignition of the engine [23]. Another issue is that once the engine is modified the warranty can be voided [23]. These issues were overcome by keeping a supply of diesel ready, and by using a United States law that says warranties are not voided after aftermarket accessories have been added [23]. 2.5 Chapter 2 Summary Chapter 2 is a very brief literature review on work pertaining to microgrids. This chapter discusses what a microgrid is and the benefits that come from it. This is followed by how load shedding is an option to keep the system up and running when generation can't meet demand. There are several methods to achieve load shedding with one of the more common ways to accomplish this is to use an undervoltage scheme. Load shedding is considered the last resort option. Before load is shed within the microgrid batteries can be added to keep the system stable. To best utilize the batteries a battery model and a battery controller will be implemented to best serve the microgrid. 9 Chapter 3 Design and Model Development 3.0 Load Shedding Definition Load shedding is the intentional reduction of load on a power system, normally to increase, but possibly to decrease the voltage magnitude and frequency to appropriate levels. In other words, load shedding is the act of balancing available generation and load when load exceeds generation. Controlling the voltage magnitude of the microgrid will help maintain the overall stability of the system. By shedding load the microgrid controller will be able to maintain power to the highest priority loads without intemrption. Load shedding helps voltage stability by balancing reactive power to help keep the microgrid operational. Frequency stability is also important factor when looking at a power system. When applying reactive power, voltage stability is the indicator of success, while working with real power, frequency stability is the indicator of success. For this project, the load shedding scheme maintains both voltage and frequency stability. It is being done this way because the method has been demonstrated in literature review. [n later chapters of this thesis, frequency measurements determine how the batteries operate. 3.1 Undervoltage Parameters There are many methods for detecting conditions to trigger load shedding in power systems, yet one of the most reliable is the monitoring of the system voltage [1]. Voltage monitoring will give a clear snapshot of the system's stability with the capacity to react quickly. This project will be monitoring the microgrid's voltage magnitudes to detect a pre- selected voltage value of below 0.9 per-unit. These parameters were chosen to allow the control systems of the hydro and solar power generation to maintain power to the critical loads for as long as possible before another load needs to be shed. 10 3.2 Initial Design For developing a load shedding scheme, there were a few problems to keep in mind. The first problem is that the load shedding scheme would shed loads based of a priority list. The second problem is that it would shed load only after bus voltages had fallen below a certain tolerance level. The third problem is that once a load has been shed, a delay needs to be implemented so a false load shed signal is not sent and a load is taken offline. The control flow and data flow diagrams, shown in Figures 3.1 and 3.2,were created to address the problems according to these points. Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2 are the control flow and data flow diagrams, respectively. . Figure 3.2 is a more general control flow diagram, which shows how the load shedding scheme will operate in conjunction with the battery controller. Start M€asure Load Vonage lf vollage <0.9 0 .Automation conboller ('l or 0) l0 wrll do nothingl Signal From Pick Next load to shed. lout of eiqht] False And Gate tlil unsigned char representing loads Shed selecled load Oalay to elimrnale transienls Load Shedding ControlFlow Diagram False 1 True Figure 3.1: Load Shedding Scheme Control Flow Diagram 11 Figure 3.2:Data Flow Diagram for Main Undervoltage System The first stage was creating the logic inside Simulink that would wait until the program sends a shed-load signal. This will occur if the batteries cannot aid the microgrid's voltage levels further. Once the load shedding controller receives this signal it will measure the incoming voltage from the microgrid loads and compare the magnitudes with the preselected value of 0.9. The load shedding scheme will check if an undervoltage event has occurred and output a Boolean value. This Boolean value will meet the load-shed signal at a logic block that will assure this conditions are met before a load is shed. If the signal to shed a load and an undervoltage event have occurred, the load-shedding controller will output the selected load that should be shed to the main program as an eight bit, unsigned character. The purpose of Figure 3.2 is to show a high level overview of how the battery controller will work with the load shedding scheme. The results in Chapter 6 will demonstrate successful lvlainBattery Logic (Charge oO Measure Voltage Load Sheclding Logic Battery Status (Supply) Battery Status (Chargel Battery Status (0tr) otc EJ go$ o f0 rEr,a €tt ? Data Flow Diagram Charging \bltage 6 T2 solution to problems discussed in the first paragraph of this section come from Figures 3.1 and 3.2 respectively. 3.3 Chapter 3 Summary The main points in the chapter are describing what a load shedding scheme is and why it is needed. Load shedding is the dropping a load from the power system in order to keep a power system stable. This chapter also discusses how the load shedding scheme will be created, as well as how it will work with the battery controller. Chapters 4-6 go into detail on the loading shedding scheme, and chapters 7-9 discuss the battery controller. l3 Chapter 4 Software Development for Load Shedding Scheme 4.0 Software As stated in Chapter 3, the initial modeling and testing of the load shedding scheme was performed in the MATLAB graphical control flow simulation software, Simulink. This platform was chosen due to the vast control system libraries and the dynamic simulation capabilities the software provides. Simulink has the capacity to graphically model and test/remove elrors from a control system inside the lntegrated Development Environment (IDE), without using extemal resources. This process allows for a quick error removal and boosts the progress towards the final goal. Simulink code also has the potential to be converted to RSCAD code and implemented into the microgrid model to test the load shedding scheme with the RTDS hardware [24]. The load shedding model working in Simulink was used as a reference while the same load shedding scheme was built in RSCAD. This was done due to the fact RSCAD doesn't have a lot of tutorials to help build a control system, so Simulink was used as a stepping stone to ensure the load shedding would react correctly in RSCAD. A Finite State Machine, (FSM), was chosen over using unsigned characters and bit-masking due to the compiler requirements for real time operation of the RSCAD software when transferring c- code between the two programs. A Moore FSM was selected and designed with two inputs and five outputs. The first input comes from either the main system as an undervoltage signal or from the energy storage system when the backup batteries are unable to meet the demand of the microgrid. The second input is a reset signal that will set all the outputs to their default position. The software design were created based on the truth table and can be found in Appendix A. Following this, the FSM was created inside a program Simulink. Figures B1-B9 in Appendix B are the next state and output logic respectively. The current t4 state and next state logic connect via a resettable flip-flop that was designed for this system. The flip-flop operates on an external clock/pulse-generator to ease the portability into future systems. Figures B1-B9 in Appendix B also show the equations used for each logic section for the loads. 4.1 RSCAD Implementation The final test model for the microgrid was built in RSCAD. This software uses a special purpose computing system to simulate in real time. Inside RSCAD, a new component was built specifically for the load shedding scheme using c-code. The component was then implemented into the microgrid model and setup to measure the per- unit voltage of the load buses to ensure power system stability. 4.2Load Shedding Scheme in RSCAI) The RSCAD simulation software uses premade functions as well as a component builder to design and program the user's control or power blocks to use in a circuit or power system. For this project the Cbuilder was used to draw and code a block that will be added into the RSCAD draft circuit of the Microgird built by a previous graduate student [1]. The use of this software should give accurate feedback on the microgrid's ability to operate with a load-shedding scheme. 4.3 Cbuilder in RSCAI) Cbuilder allows users to design, draw, code, and parameterize control and power components for use in a system models. The block design of the load shedding controller was created with the appropriate inputs and outputs needed entered into the header and c- file. Figure 4.1 illustrates the design of the load shedding controller based off Figure 3.1. 15 The colors of the VO ports signify the value type; Green are real numbers (doubles data type 64 bits long) and Blue are integers (32 bits long). A more in-depth view on how the controller was designed and the C code implemented is found in Appendices A-C. Figure 4.1: Graphical Representation of Load Shedding Controller The tools in Cbuilder described above were used to address the following problems introduced in Chapter 3. The first problem is that the load shedding scheme would shed loads based of a priority list. The second problem is that it would shed load only after bus voltages had fallen below a certain tolerance level. The third problem is that once a load has been shed, a delay needs to be implemented so a false load shed signal is not sent and a load Glosr-BRK CLN Rmrl LoedShcd-Enrblc Load l rignels Load2 Load3 Load4 Loed5 Load*Shed loadS rpr€t LOADSHEB U-te B_q u u U_\A cloql t6 is taken offline. Once a load has been shed a delay is asserted before bus voltages are measured again. 4.4 Chapter 4 Summary The main point of this chapter was to discuss the software development for the load shedding scheme. It was f,rrst built and tested in Simulink to use the available resources available in the program. Once the controller was behaving correctly in Simulink it was then built in RSCAD using Cbuilder. Chapter 5 will further discuss the development of the load shedding scheme, and Chapter 6 will go over the results. t7 Chapter 5 Controller Implementation in RSCAD 5.0 VO Ports of the Component . This chapter discusses how the load shedding controller in Figure 4.1 was developed and implemented. We want this pseudo hardware to measure voltage, and if the bus voltages fall below a set tolerance level then shed the lowest priority load on the list of loads is shed. Once a load has been shed a delay is implemented before measures bus voltages are processed so a false trip signal is not sent. The six U_V inputs, Figure 5.1, are the per unit values from bus nodes in the power system that the user desires to monitor for undervoltage protection. The "Close_BRK", (B_C as seen below in Figure 5.2), input is the signal that tells the load-shedding controller to compare the bus voltages with the value that was chosen as the limit at which the loads should be brought back on. The "CLK" input is the clock signal that determines when the load-shedding controller will process the programmed code. When the "CLK" signal is asserted the load-shedding controller will execute the program and will determine whether a load will be shed or reconnected to the power system. The reset input has been put into the design as a precaution for the unlikely event that the FSM goes into a state that it was not designed for. When a reset is asserted the load-shedding controller software state will be forced into state zero, (idle state). The "LOADSHED" input is the signal that tells the load- shedding controller to shed load when the undervoltage conditions are met. 18 V If,Ft'TS reset clock u_v2 uv3 u_v4 u_vs u_v5 t_vl B_C INAIX'HEI} Figure 5.1 : List of Inputs For the Load Shedding Scheme The outputs are the signals that go to the breaker controllers inside the power system. As seen from Figure 5.4, each output is an integer and can be changed inside the parameter window in the draft file to whatever value is needed for a specific breaker controller. The number of loads can be readily adjusted in the C code. An operating scenario with these parameters is tested in chapter 6. ffi U trr EN ffi U ET E[4 llrl E[ -& E -& -& v tIIrF0?s 1oad1 loEd2 1oaal3 load4 load5 rt'l-r V I0 Point: load1 tllff)v ilfi v IO Poinr: load2 (I$I)v ffiI v IO Point: 1oad3 (Iml v nl-I IO PoinE: 1oad4 (IIfi)v nII v IO Point: loads (IlcI)v Effi-effi Effi -&trr -effi Figure 5.2: List of Outputs for the Load Shedding Scheme 5.1 Parameters of Component The parameters of the load shedding component were designed to make the coding of the component intuitive. Each of the parameters can be seen in both Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4. The value of the per-unit voltage that will trigger an undervoltage event is controlled by the "U_Vrange" parameter. The value at which the breakers will be allowed is controlled by ilfiI f IO PoinE: reset (Iltll REAL IO Point: clock (RElI,l REAL v IO PoinE: L V2 (REAII v REAL v IO Point: U V3 (RF}I)v REAI v IO Poior: U V4 (REAII v REAL v IO PoiDr: U V5 (REALI REAL v IO Poj.Er: U v6 (REAI)v REAL V IO Point: t Vl (REAL)v REAL v IOPoint:BC(REA.I)v ffi V IO PoinE: I0ADSIiED (Iml v v t9 the "Close_BRK_Rg" parameter. Both the "U_Vrange" and "Close BRK_Rg" are both real numbers that are represented by 64 bits. In the instance the system that runs the load- shedding controller has memory registers, both values for load action can be altered to an integer (32 bits), or a char (8 bits), to meet the conditions of the system. The controller will delay load shedding as well as the reclosing of breakers with the "FaultDelay" and the "Close_BRK_1", both of which are a time delay, with the code shown in Appendix C. Prtyp is the solve model card type used in RSCAD. Proc is the assigned controls processor. Pri is the priority level of the loads. These parameters control the number of iterations the program goes through, effectively delaying the program. The last of the parameters are "OpenLOADl-5" and "CloseLOADl-5" and are used to the set the values that output to the breaker controllers. V PIBAICTBi/CIilP('TAIIIE U_Vrurge pltl? EaultDeI6y Close_Enl(_E CIose_ERK_fu ClosefllAl)3 CIoSeIIIAD{ CloseIInDS op€DI0AD1 opeDmAD2 OpedOAD3 OpeDmAD{ OpenJIAD5 CloseIOADl CloseLOlD2 REAL Para.Deter: U Vrange IIII v ParaDeter: prtlp v II{I v Parameter: faultDelay v I}IT V PareqeEer: Close BRK t REAL v PararDeter: Close BRK Rg v IIilI v Parameter: CloseI"OlD3 v fiff v ParaneEer: CloseloAD4 V rIrI Fararoeter: CloseLOABs IIII v Paraneter: oIxnLOlDl V ilff Parameter: Op€nIrA.Dz v Il[I v Pararneter: C!€DIOAD3 $IT Paraneter: o1renl"oAD4 IHl v Parrneter: openl,oADs v I}rI V PararDeter : CloseloADl V IIII v ParaDeter: CloseLoAD2 V _t-&ml -effil EffiI -eEil EtrrI -effil -&Eil BEII -effil -effil ETf,I -sffil -effil -effil -eul Figure 5.3: List of Parameters for the Load Shedding Scheme 20 Proc Assj.qned Controls ProcessoE Pri Prioricy Level g_vrange Range of underroltage Cetectioa plEyp So1ve Uodel oa card tlXle: Close_BRK_Rg Range oi volEage Eo c].ose bftakers v sEctllol: Clogel.oADl Value of output iot to close Breaker CloseICAD2 Value of output int io close Breaker CloselOAD3 Value of outpuE int to clcee Eleaker CloseLOlD4 Value of output int to close Brealrer CIoseLOADS Va1ue of output int to clcae Blea].er o,penLOAlI Value of outpuc inE to OPE$ Brea!.er OpenIOA.D2 Value of ouEtlut inE Ec OPEN Breater CEenI,CAD3 Value of ouEput inE to OFEI{ Breater OpenLOAD4 Value of output iat to OPEN ErEake! Open],gAos Value of output inE to OPEH Ereaker '7 SECrIttII: oDEIAYil faultDeLay Delay io rule out faulca Close_BRK_t Delay until breal.er(st close 1 1 1 1 36 ;RFC;GPC/FBs 0.92 0 t 1 1 1 1 a I B I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 I 0 Figure 5.4: Overview of Available System Configurations for the Load Shedding Scheme 5.2 Chapter 5 Summary Chapter 5 describes how the load shedding controller in Figure 4.1 was developed. We want this controller program to measure voltage and if the bus voltages fall below a set tolerance level then shed the lowest priority load on the list of loads. It should then delay before it measures bus voltages again so a false trip signal is not sent. In short this chapter discusses how the system operates. An example of using this software is shown in Chapter 6. IIfIEGER Ir{TEGER REALY}B IffiLE RL4I 1TIIEGER ISIEGEF. II{TE€F8 INlEGER 1}IIEGER 1],ITEGER II{"IEGER I}I'JEGER lSIEGER II{IEGEA IHNEB i}IIIAR 2l Chapter 6 Simulink and RTDS Simulation Results of Load Shedding Scheme 6.0 Simulation in Simulink The Simulink simulation software was first to be used to test the load-shedding scheme. During the simulation a fixed step size was used to observe the potential time frame of the decision to shed load. Figure 6.1 shows the results of a simulation using a pulse generator with a period of 50 seconds to enable signal to shed load, which was initiated at 32 seconds. These signals are triggered to overlap each other. Once the first load has been shed and 50 seconds has passed load2 will shed, which will then overlap the first load shed. Figure 6.1: Simulink Simulations All Loads Shed in Succession The decision to shed load shown in Figure 6.1 was based on the undervoltage logic scheme and the timing for shedding loads was based off the period of the pulse generator. The period of the pulses can then be adjusted to shed loads slower or faster based off of what works best for the system. The program may also be reset by asserting the reset input t Ld-9.drnl._Lo$d I Lsd- &.dniq,Lors2 Lcd Shlum Ladj kd-Sr'cddrl{_Lqda [d_Snd$& LEEi 22 at any time. Upon asserting the reset, at the rising edge of the pulse generator all five outputs will be pulled to zero. This can be observed in Figure 6.2. Figure 6.2: Simulink Simulation All Loads Shed in Succession Then Reset In Figure 6.2 fwe outputs have sent the signal to shed load (refer to the legend on the top right). The reset input is then assertedat2S5 seconds on Figure 6.2 and all load outputs are pulled to zero at 300 seconds. This 15 second delay is to ensure all the loads will be reset before the load shedding process starts again. After two pulse generator periods the load shed signal is once again asserted to show that the first load will be triggered after a reset has occurred. 6.1 Simulating the Load Shedding Scheme in RSCAD The Real Time Digital Simulator (RTDS), was used to simulate the microgrid model with the load-shedding controller implemented into the model with the needed per-unit measurements attached at the correct positions. Each of the bus voltage measurements are L6-Mn{ Logut rdd-slnddrlt- Lqd2! t t _r Lord. Sfidnold_Srqbifl-Ld_Shdm I I I i I s l5?N :!$4!O 1 F n ls 5fl, r'500.000 z3 represented meters and green lights when each load is connected (breaker closed), and red lights when the load is disconnected from the microgrid (breaker open). This is opposite to industry practice where red represents a live circuit and green an open circuit. It should be noted that these meters are on the source side of the breaker, and as a result when load is shed the voltage meter values will increase. The meter readings for the loads that are shed in Figures 6.3 , 6.5 , and 6.6 will go to zero because those meters are on the load side of the breaker. The most critical load, Meter U_Vl, does not have an indicator light because it will never be shed from the microgrid. This will allow the most critical loads to stay active for the longest time with little reduction in voltage. The load-shedding controller was set to trigger an undervoltage event at a per-unit voltage of below 0.90 and reconnect a load to the microgrid at 0.93 per-unit voltage. These settings should allow the microgrid to remain stable, but further study is required to verify this. The goal of simulating the load-shedding scheme is to make sure the loads are shed when there is a threat of undervoltage and yet delayed enough to keep any transients from triggering unnecessary load shedding. The RTDS Runtime simulation window can be seen in Figures 6.3 through 6.6 in multiple stages of the simulation. Figure 6.3 is the setup of the Runtime program. The top left meters and the lights directly below them correspond with each other as most critical load on the far left ("U_V1"), and least critical load in the middle, ("U_V6" and "Loadl"). The switches to the right of these meters are the integer inputs that tell the load-shedding controller to shed or reconnect loads if the proper voltage condition is present. To the right of the switches are the sliders that control the excitation of the hydroelectric generators one and two, along with the "Clock" of the load-shedding controller between them. The reset switch is the last control component and is used to set the FSM back to an idle state in case 24 of program failure. Below the control components are the meters and graphs that monitor the bus voltages and power of specific loads. In order to run this simulation and test the load shedding scheme as shown in the f,rgures below the excitation of the hydroelectric dam generators was lowered in small increments. As the simulation continues one will be able to see the load voltages drop to nearly zero as each of the loads are shed. The two graphs from the middle to the right-hand side are the three-phase RMS voltage and the power of the most critical load, respectively. Figure 6.3: Load Shedding Interface in RTDS Runtime Once the simulation was running to demonstrate the load shedding scheme the next step in the test was turning down the output voltage of hydroelectric generator one to simulate excess load on the system. Transitioning between Figure 6.3 and Figure 6.4 one can observe that as the voltage of the system drops the monitors will light up blue to indicate <<tlc\'!I 5 Shed-able Loads LEdl RUS (ku tdd 2 RMS (rvl [r.d 3 RMS (rV] ,-.r-.-% ffi EE Lod 4 Rtts (lill tord 5 RMS (rvl llin --1r:r-1Er;6rj---- Highest Priority Load ffi u-unswr Power of Highesl Pnonty Load ;<tl Ar'.. t l : ll-Ejl ll4Ji rlgJl l4JiHUnJI Ur 25 the voltage the bus voltage has dropped below 0.9 per unit. Once the controller detects this undervoltage event a delay counter starts and waits for any transients to clear to keep loads on as long as possible. Figure 6.4:Load Shedding Simulation 2 Bus Voltages As the delay period was completed the first load was shed. Then, a second delay period passed while the voltage was under the designed limit. Figure 6.5 shows the lights monitoring U_V5 and U_V6 have turned red and the bus voltages of the first two loads have dropped to almost zero. The reduction in power and voltage of the highest priority load is also visible in Figure 6.5 as well. 0. 9038 E.8969 0. 890 8.89 0.8922 o.89?" f,,A r't' ., ,drl Ao*'ot-L__.+_ L$#F t.tr lJ{ 26 Shed-able Loads Lodl RMSi (kv) Lold 2 RMSi (kV) Load 3 RirS (tV) a od!4Mo&rD@EraE !, Lord 5 RMS {kV}Lud 4 RMS (kV) ffiffi Highest Priority Load @l l v,nrsnvrI F,6qS I - Power of Highest Pnority Load <<qA'. L--:{ a aa Figure 6.5: Load Shedding Simulation 3 2 Loads Tripped The last step in testing the load-shedding was lowering the per-unit voltage of generator low enough so that the only load left online is U_Vl which is the highest priority load. This test was performed to keep the most critical load at or above 0.9 volts per-unit. With a voltage level at or above 0.9 per-unit the systems connected to that bus would still be able to operate. Noted in Figure 6.5 is the power of the highest priority load, this value appears to vary a lot because the vertical scale is small, when in reality it varies by approximately .lMW. Figure 6.6 shows all the loads except the last load as shed. The most critical load, (U_V1), has a per-unit value of above 0.9. I Eitrr_]lt,-;'l 27 Figure 6.6:Load Shedding Simulation 4 All but Highest Trip In Figure 6.6 above, the power and voltage is stable at 09079 volts per-unit. Although there are some buses that are undervoltage the most critical remains connected within voltage limits. 6.2 Chapter 6 Summary Chapter 6 of this thesis centered around the implementation of a load shedding scheme. One of the issues of the microgrid discussed in chapter was actions to take in certain instances when not being able to supply power to every load in the system. This chapter takes the list of prioritized loads from phase 1 of this project. It then discussed how the load shedding scheme was implemented in Simulink, which was in turn used as a base to implement in RSCAD. This was done for ease of development and to ensure accuracy. The tests results from simulations for Simulink and RSCAD prove that the load shedding scheme Highest Prionty Load @l uvrnrsrwrtE6i?t - Shed'able Loads Lo.dl Rl,ls (l(v) Lo..t 2 RMS (rV) Lold 3 RMS (tY) ffiffiffi L..d 4 Rlrs (kv) L6d i RMS (wl 6ritra:-] iEnE:-]f:rr-tJ.j&-i I rl rlid Power of Highest Priority Load -.;_llrlLi 'I =--ltr 28 worked in simulation. Figure 4.1 shows a block diagram ofjust the load shedding controller. A more in depth view on how the controller was designed and the C code implemented is found in Appendices A-C. Specifically the content of the appendices is as follows: Appendix A shows the truth tables for the finite state machine, Appendix B show the next state and output logic diagrams and equations, and Appendix C shows the RSCAD Cbuilder files and the Ccode that goes along with them. In this microgrid, the load shedding is not the first option to take action. Before any load is shed the system checks to see if there are any batteries that can supply power to the microgrid. In order to use these batteries efficiently there needs to be a battery controller to tell the batteries whether they need to supply power to the microgrid or to charge. To implement this a battery model built and tested. This is discussed more in greater detail in the next few chapters. 29 Chapter 7: Battery Controller 7.1 Introduction The purpose of the battery controller is to evaluate the frequency of the system and send a signal to the battery to correct the frequency, as well as help with real power management. If the batteries can't maintain all of the bus voltages at .9 per-unit, then the battery controller sends a signal to the load shedding scheme. The controller is a stackable unit that will communicate to other controllers to ensure they have done everything necessary before changing the state of other batteries [3]. Appendix D shows the coding for the battery controller shown in Figure 7.1. The battery controller needs to be able to perform several tasks. Those tasks include supplying power to the system at the appropriate time or using power from the system to charge. A flow diagram is shown in Figure 7.1. 30 Start Read Frequency Tne TrL e OpiisEl Freo H€h F.eq Fage TruE Reduce State .L: True Start Supplying/Absorbing Stop Supplying/Absorbing Clear Wait Command Previous Device Lcil Frea FEISE F9 Ee E9 se Set Wait Command Previous Device Device Next lncrease State True FElse Figure 7 .l: Battery Control Flow Diagram 31 The batteries will react to changes in frequency of the system make a decision based off that. The controller is set up such that it can increase or decrease the amount of power transfer to or from the batteries. The first step with the controller is that it takes frequency measurements from across the system and compares those frequencies to a reference. Based off of those comparisons the battery controller will make one of a few decisions. The f,rrst is the frequency higher or lower than the system normal. Then the controller will decide to either start charging the batteries or using the batteries to supply power. Once a battery is in supply mode, the controller will measure voltages across the system to check if one battery is adequate to maintain a stable system. If one battery isn't enough a signal called "Enable" is sent from the battery controller to the second battery to tum on. This model should help to correct frequency drops in the system during peak load times. 7.2 Battery Model Introduction The main purpose in creating a power system model of the battery is so the battery controller can be tested to see if it operates correctly with the other controls in the microgrid. The battery model used in the project works as an ideal current source with three different settings. A generic ideal current source was used and is shown in Figure 7.7. These settings correspond to the values described later in this chapter. There are three levels of supplying or charging for the batteries, which are low, medium and high. A value of I means supply or absorb the least amount of current, a value of 3 means supply or absorb the highest amount of current possible, and a value of 2 is medium level. The battery controller, which is described in more detail later in this chapter will measure and compare the frequency, and then determine if the batteries should be supplying or absorbing power and at what rate. Once this decision has been made, the battery )Z controller will send commands to the batteries themselves. The controller will update the commands to the batteries in real time. For example, if the batteries are in supply mode and the controller determines it needs to start absorbing power a new command will be sent to the batteries to change modes. 7.3 Battery Controller in RSCAD The design of the controller with the present microgrid model was done in RSCAD using the CBuilder functionality described in Chapter 6. By using CBuilder a user can create control blocks, like the one shown in Figure 7.2.The control block consists of inputs and outputs that are transmitted to and from code programmed in a C-based coding environment. Figure 7 .2: Battery Controller The inputs of the system are shown in Figure 1.3.The "Freq" refers to the frequency input used for comparison. "CLK" is a pulse function with a period set to the user's preference. The period of the pulse function will designate how often the controller can Enable in Wait out State D Freq CLK Enable out Wait in aaJJ make adjustments. 'ol-_in", which is "Enable in" in Figure 7.3,is the signal from the previous controller in a predetermined sequence. If "L_in" is a zero the controller will not change state because the previous controller is working to resolve the problem. This input will not allow multiple batteries to be set to charge or discharge at the same time. If more than one battery is required the batteries are set to go into a charge or discharge state based off of a predetermined sequence. The last input is "'W_in", which is "Wait in" in Figure 7.3, is used to communicate with the next controller. This input allows the batteries to be turned off sequentially and not simultaneously. v IITFOIS Freq CIJ( T'.in Il_iD REAI v IO Point: Freq (REAU v REAL v IO Poinr: CUt (REAL)V IIII v IO Poinr: I in (INI)v ilt-r v IO Point: I{ in (It{I)V U ffi E[ ffi EEEE Figure 7.3: Controller Inputs Each of these inputs are points on the controller symbol and are declared by RSCAD to be used in the coding environment. Like the inputs of the system, the outputs are set, as shown in Figure 7.4,to be used in the C-code of the program. 'ol_out", which is "Enable Out" in Figure 7.3, is the output to the next controller and will output zero until the battery is operating at full capacity for charge or discharge. When releasing energy into the system 'ol_out" will be '1'. If the battery is absorbing energy from the system the output will be '- l'. The output 'State' of the battery will be an integer value of 1,2, or 3. This value communicates to the battery how much power the battery can either supply or absorb. A value of I means the state is at the lowest power setting, this correlates to the baffery charging at the slowest rate possible, or being able to supply a smaller amount of power for the longest amount of time possible. A value of 3 is opposite of this in that the battery will 34 charge at the fastest rate possible, or supply the largest amount of power for the shortest period of time. Having value of 2 means the batteries supply power or charge at a medium rate, which isn't the highest or lowest amount possible. "P_out" and "C_out" are binary values where "P_out" is a value of '1' when the battery is supplying power to the system. "C_out" is a value of '1' when the batteries are charging, or absorbing power, from the system. If "P_out" is a value of 1 then "C_out" has the value of 0. This means that the batteries can't be supplying and absorbing power at the same time. "'W'_out" is the output to the previous controller and is '1' when the previous controller needs to wait. The wait command will be sent whenever the battery is supplying or absorbing the power allowing only one battery to change conditions at a time. v tltt?tfs f,_out Saate P_out C ,out Il_out Figure 7.4: Controller Outputs as Assigned in RSCAD The last of the items used in the coding of the controller, shown in Figure 7 .5, are the parameters. These parameters are set when the controller is introduced in the draft portion of the model and can be changed to fit the user's needs. "High_Freq" is the value at which the controller considers the frequency to be high enough to start charging the batteries. "Low_Freq" parameter determines the value for the frequency at which the batteries will supply power to the microgrid. The values in Figure 7.6 are the frequency input values of Figure 7.3. ffi ET 4 l0I Eil ET vn[I v IO Poinu: t ouE (INT) II{I v IO Poinr: State (IIirI) vIHTvIO Poinc: P out (II[I) I}II V IO PoiEt: C out (Iml v I}rJ IO PoinE: fl out (IIII]vV 35 V PARAilE'IERS/trilHITATIMIS High_Ereq Lou_Freq Figure 7.5: Controller Parameters 7 .4 Battery Controller Implementation in RSCAD The completed controller will be connected to the battery component and the other battery controllers in the system. The stacking of the controller will allow there to be no limitation in the number or rating of batteries that can be added to the system. A two-battery system controller is shown in Figure 7.6.Here "CLK" has a frequency of I Hertz so the controller can change states every second as needed. Enable in, or "L_in", is set on the first controller to '1' to tell the controller there is no previous controller. "Enable out" and "Wait in" is connected to the second controller. The second controller has "Wait in" set to '0' which indicates, to the first controller, that it is the last controller in the stack. C, P, and State are connected to their corresponding battery in the system. 5tat6 Fteq Fraq ffi ffi StalEl REAI V Parameter: Hlgh Ereq v REAL V Parer*eEer: Ior Freq V Enable in wa[ out o 513tr Freg cLh Enable out wa.lt tn EnabE m WaBott c F State Freq CLI{ Enable out Walt ln Figure 7.6:2 Controller System LI 36 The last input is'oFreq" which is the frequency measurement input from the system. The controller will use the value for "Freq" to make decisions for the batteries. Those decisions are if the battery should be supplying or absorbing power, and at what rate of power transfer. 7.5 Battery Power System Model Configuration in RSCAD The power system model was developed in RSCAD CBuilder using a C-based coding environment. The inputs to the model are shown in Figure 7.7 and Figure 7.8 for the power system model. The input values described in this paragraph are the same values described earlier and in Appendix D. "C_in" is a binary value that indicates to the battery to absorb energy, or charge the battery. 'oP_in" is a binary value which indicates to the battery to supply power. "State" is an integer value from the controller which indicates how much power to absorb or supply to the system. *CLK" is an input of a pulse fi.urction which has a frequency of 1 Hz for real time calculations. Figure 7.7 depicted below shows this model. P_in ,: LltState Figure 7.1:Battery Model in RSCAD 6 State CLK P '7 INPIITS C_in P_in State NV JI IIflI IO Point: C in (Iffil rIfi IO Point: P in (Il{t) IlIT v IO Point: SEate {Im} REAL IO Poinr: CU{ {REAI}V g I(]JJ ffi ffi ffi -& -& -& Figure 7.8: Battery Inputs as Assigned in RSCAD The nodes for the battery are shown in Figure 7.9.The nodes connect to the rest of the system. The nodes are also used to measure the voltage values from which to calculate the response of the system. "A_1", 'oB_1", and "C_1" are the positive terminals of the battery. ((Y 2)' is the negative terminal of all three phases and will be ungrounded in the system. v EI}ES REAL vl[uooe: v z v REAL vllroae: n r v REAI -llroae: n r REAL -lluoae: c r v Figure 7 .9 : Battery Nodes The parameters shown in Figure 7.10 are set by the user to be employed in the calculations in the code. "Powerl", "Power2", and "Power3" are power settings of the battery. Depending on the situation the system may require a higher or lower level of power. The controller will determine which power setting the battery will use. "Powerl" is the low power setting and "Power3" is the high power setting of the system. "Initial_Energy''is set by the user and is the starting stored energy of the battery in Joules. "MonI" is a binary value controlled by a switch used to trigger whether internal values will be monitored in runtime or not. When activated, "Current_Batt","Energy_Stored", and "Power" can be monitored in Runtime. "Current_Batt" is the current through one of the phases of the battery. "Energy_Stored" is the amount of energy in joules remaining in the battery. "Power" is the output power of the battery at any given time in watts. "Max_Charge" is in units ofjoules -&ffi -effi -effi -effi v_2 A_1 B_1 c_I 38 and refers to the limit of energy that the battery can absorb. "Max_Discharge" is in units of joules and refers to the limi of energy discharge for the battery. "Max_Charge" and "Max Discharge" is defined by the user for each of the battery units. V PIBIDETES/(II|Pi!'AfIIf,S trare Pomrl Porn12 Pouer3 Inital_EEetqy HonI Cutlent_Batt Energy_Stoled lGr_CharqE llar_Dischalge Pofler Bage Poner .7 I}IiTEtrIM{S RE.f,L vlluoae: I 1 v REAI -llltoae: a r v REAL vllroae: c 1 v RE.AI -llrooe: v e v Figure 7.1 1: Battery Current Labels The variables shown in Figure 7.12 are used in the code and are connected to the monitored values mentioned in Figure 7.10. Setting one of these variables equal to a value will output that value and be monitored when simulating the model. "IMON" outputs the curent from phase A to the "Current_Batt" variable. "En" outputs the energy stored in the ffi ffi ffi ffi6 ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi IA IB IC IG ffi ffi ffiu E -& B -M CH.AR v Fareneter: Narre v REAL v ParanreEer: PoHerl v REAL v ParaEeEer: Forerz v REAL v parareeEer: polrer3 REAL v Paraneter: IniEal Energy v I}II V Parameter: Uoni,Eor v CHAR Para:neEer: CurrenE BatE v CIIAR v Faramter: Enerqy SEored v REAL v Parirpecer: Nax Ctrarqe RE.LL v PareFter: Na:r Discharge v CHAR v Para.neter: Forr'er v REAL V Farafieter: Base Poner v Figure 7.10: Battery Parameters Entered by User When read, the nodes for the power system device will give the voltage atthat point. ln order to control and measure the current through the nodes, the system uses injections for each of the nodes. IA, IB, and IC are the current injections on the positive terminal of the battery system. IG is the negative terminal connection curent for the power system. The sum of IA, IB, IC, and IG should equal to 0. 39 battery at that time and outputs that value to "Energy_Stored". "P_out" outputs the power that the battery is generating to the variable'oPower". v create: GETIERIC 0IITPtffS r!.foll En P_out RETL v REAL v REAL v {Current_Batt, "Branch Currents", -10,110, "A", . . . (Enerqy_5tored, -Enerqy Storage-, -10, 110, "J", . . . ( Porrc r, "Enerlrl Storage', -t 0, 1 1 0,'H", l{onI:1 ),' fffiiffiiffi Figure 7 .12: Monitored Battery Values 7.6 Software Development in Simulink The energy storage in the microgrid system will help to offset load peaks in the system. To achieve this a controller will evaluate the current state of the system and react appropriately. Under conditions where generation exceeds load in the microgrid the system will store energy and at peak times that system will release energy from the batteries to balance the system and avoid load shedding. The energy storage devices, or batteries, will activate one at a time to correct the system. The software used to develop the controller is Matlab Simulink. A finite state machine was chosen to develop the battery controller as shown in Figure 7.13. FH indicates a high frequency condition input, while FL indicates a low frequency condition input. S0 is the initial idle state the batteries are in, which means the batteries are not charging or discharging. This system will constantly be monitoring frequency. If FH, a high frequency condition, is measured then the system will move to state one, which is charging battery 1. Once in S1 the system will compare the frequency again, if it stays high it will move to 52 and start chargingbattery 2. This process is followed throughout Figure 7.13. 40 Tr- In fH f*fH f;frh fL fL f fL fg f1 Tl TH rLh fL Itr fL Ir-h f*fn f*fH TH Iih fr- Tn fi- In Ir- fir Tlh f* Figure 7.13: State Transition Diagram The State Transition Diagram shown in Figure 7.13 shows the transition logic of the controller for the energy storage devices. The controller in this example uses five batteries and each battery has three states; on, off, and charging. S0 indicates all batteries are off, S1- 55 indicates the respective batteries are charging, states 56-5l0 indicate the batteries are supplying power, and Sl I is when the batteries have reached their power limit so load needs to be shed. The Boolean output for each of the five batteries in the system are shown in Table 7 .l.In the table L is the command to shed load and P is the command for each of the batteries to supply power to the system. The last variable is C and that is to charge the battery when everything is set to a zero value, the batteries will be disconnected. Table 7 .1 shows the exact same information as Figure l.l3,but in a tabular format. 4t $l;rt,r,t J", l'r Jir ('lrtl.lrulr J'J Pr 1-':,r,i cr a rlrilftilurlilrl{}{l{}{} 5r 5j 5x "!r\'. il {t {t il {l t, t, {l ll {} {l r; r) t, li tl il (t t) {t {t {l {i il {t il {l il il (l t, l'} {} t I {l {} tI ll I I I I I I t, I r I r {, {, , I l 5r; .t; Tt* 5i, Strr 5u {t {t {f {t {l I rl {, t, I I , {} ll {} tl tl il {} I I I 1 I rl I I t l !I {l {t {} {} t t ( { I I I I I I {f {t II il 1t il {} {, {} {r tl n {t II {l {t {t il Table 7.1: Output Transition Table 7.7 Implementation in Simulink Figure 7.14 shows a block diagram of the battery controller built in Matlab Simulink. This figure was built from the data in Figure I .13 and Table 7.1. The inputs fL and fII are constants and simulate frequency in the system being low or high. Display C1-C5 and P1-P5 will show a value of 0 or 1. For C1-C5 a value of 1 means the battery is in a charging state while a 0 means it is not charging. For Pl-P5 a value of 1 indicates the batteries are discharging (supplying power) and 0 indicates no power is being supplied. The battery controller was implemented to be used in conjugation with a load shedding scheme, but in the case of looking strictly atbattery control it is not needed. 42 Generator Pulse Display C'l Display P1 Constant Constantl Battery Logic (Fraquency Regulalion) Display C5 Display P5 Conslant2 To Load Shedding Scheme Figure 7.14:Battery Controller in Simulink 7.8 Simulation of Battery Controller in Simulink Table 7.2 and Table 7.3 describe the battery controller response if there is a sustained low frequency and high frequency input. Charging or discharging a battery will reduce or increase the frequency level of the system respectively. For the cases shown in Tables 7.2 and7.3 the batteries were not programmed to affect system frequency, but rather to show that the battery converters can be stopped or started sequentially. In the Tables below we see that at each time step of .2 ms the next battery will either start charging or discharging. time ms ut 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Ouput:C C1 c2 C3 c4 C5 0 0 0 0 0 ut: Po P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 1. 1. 1. 7 1. 0 0 c3 c4 P,1 CLK P4 Reset fl- fll 0 Table 7 .2: Battery Controller Simulation Low Frequency Input 43 time m ut:COu C1 c2 C3 c4 c5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1. 7 1, t 1 Output:P P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 0 0 0 0 0 Table 7 .3: Battery Controller Simulation High Frequency Input 7.9 Chapter 7 Summary The main point of this chapter was to design a battery controller that could sense a low or high frequency condition and then start charging or discharging batteries in a set sequence over time. This task was accomplished and can be seen in Figures 7.2 and7.3. As discussed in the results section charging or discharging the batteries didn't affect the frequency since it wasn't part of the full system. Another key point discusses the design of the controller within the microgrid model. This was done in RSCAD using the CBuilder functionality and in Matlab Simulink. Some of this issues addressed in this chapter include, "Should the baffery be charging or supplying power?" Then once in this charging or supplying state; "What should be the rate of charge?" The design of the controller was based around those questions. This chapter also gives a very simple overview of anenergy storage model. The objective of this model is to add the batteries and their energy storage control in the present microgrid model. This model will use an ideal current source as the subject of application for this model. These batteries have three power settings listed which are used to develop the characteristics of the supplying and absorbing power abilities of the batteries. 44 The results shown in Figures 7.2 and7.3 are programmed with a constant low or high frequency input changed by the operator. The simulations show the converter can be stopped or started. The next step would be to program the batteries so a more realistic simulation could be performed to show how they affect system frequency, and actually include in the microgrid simulation. This is discussed more in the future work section of this thesis. 45 Chapter 8: Diesel to Natural Gas Conversion Kits 8.0 Introduction to Diesel to Natural Gas Conversion There are currently 18 backup generators distributed in the microgrid area, mostly at the hospitals. Together all the generators can provide approximately 14.75 MW. This generation would add a significant amount of power to the current generation available [1]. By using the power from the generators, it would be possible to keep critical loads from shedding. Currently, all of the hospital backup generators are setup to feed only their respective facilities. There is no existing connection or method, for them to synchronize with the microgrid and transfer their output power to the local distribution system. The hospital generators are currently diesel-fueled. Because of environmental restrictions, the use of diesel generators is limited to short durations during emergencies. To allow more use of the generators, environmental standards require a more eco-friendly fuel source, such as natural gas. After the conversion, the generators can be re-commissioned and approved for longer run times. It is anticipated that the conversion will allow the generators to offset the daily peak load and, therefore, reduce peak load rise ofenergy prices. Being able to use the excess power from the hospital generators would affect the microgrid in two ways. The first is the power supplied has the potential to keep a load from having to be shed, assuming the natural gas pumping stations have power in a regional blackout. The second is the power could be used to charge the batteries. 8.1 Diesel to Natural Gas Conversion Kit A company called GFS Corp is experienced in converting commercial grade diesel generators to a hybrid mix of diesel and natural gas. Most of its projects provide the 46 customer's existing generators with peak shaving capabilities. GFS Corp is able to perform this conversion for any type ofdiesel generator. 8.2 Conversion Kit Specifications According to a phone interview performed with a representative of the company, the conversion process will provide the following benefits to the newly converted engines: 1) Non-invasive retrofit. The existing engines will not need to be disassembled for any part ofthe conversion process. [3] 2) The engines will start up on diesel, then convert to a hybrid operation of diesel and natural gas. [3] 3) Maximum operation of 7UYo natural gas to 30% diesel. [3] 4) Conversion for one unit usually takes two days (one day to install and another day to re-commission). [3] 5) No added power loss after the conversion process. [4] 6) Extends generator run time using pipelined natural gas [4] The information described in above would help the microgrid in several ways. A few of them include providing more power which in turn could keep load from being shed, charging the batteries, and a cleaner burning fuel source. Another perk of these kits is they are installed in a minimal amount of time which lessens impact on the area. A key point for these kits is that there can be benefits beyond the microgrid. 8.3 Chapter 8 Summary This chapter has discussed some basic research done on diesel to natural gas conversion kits. In detail it goes over the conversion kit specifications and some of the benefits it could have for the microgrid. Not only is it cleaner buming, which result in longer 47 run times during normal operations, but there is also no power loss after the conversion. The next step would be the implementation of a model of these converted generators in PowerWorld and RSCAD. The future work section goes over this in more detail. 48 Chapter 9: Automation Controller 9.0 Automation Controller Introduction Automation control is the use of various control systems for operating equipment such as machinery, processes in factories, and other applications and vehicles with minimal or reduced human intervention [1]. To introduce more control the microgrid, an automation controller was constructed by combining hardware shown in Figure 9.1, automation logic, such as the load-shedding and battery control logic used in this project, and a Human Machine Interface (HMI). The automation logic in the protective relays decides when action is necessary to improve the state of the system. The sensors are placed throughout the microgrid to collect and transmit data to the real-time automation controller (RTAC) communications processor for control action and for the information to be displayed through an HMI. The operator uses the HMI to analyze and interact with the system. 9.1 Hardware Development Figure 9.1: Hardware Implementation Scheme As shown in Figure 9.1, the data flow within the hardware is bidirectional. The currents, voltages, and frequencies from the microgrid are measured by the protective relays and sent to the RTAC to make informed commands, if action is necessary. The operator's computer, far right on Figure 9.1, monitors the process through the HMI and has the ability to intervene and reconfigure device settings. Hardware lmplementation SEL 451 Protective Relay + <-SEL 3530 RTAC - a-Operator's Computer 49 9.2 Software Configuration Figure 9.2: Software Implementation Scheme In Figure 9.2, vendor settings software programs were used to configure and commission the RTAC and implement load-shedding in relays that are already present for system protection. From the settings configured in the RTAC, the HMI can be customized for the system. Appendix F shows the software and hardware used in automation controller development. Once the software is configured and the HMI is developed it can be used to monitor values from with the hardware described in Figure 9.1, and control things such as breakers in the system. 9.3 Protection Relay When setting the automation controller, reference tags are used to transmit and receive desired outcomes in the relay. Tags act as pointers to program commands within the relay. Based on assigned tag values and automation logic, the automation controller either performs actions on the microgrid as shown in Table 9.1 or turns on corresponding LED alarm lights as shown in Figure 9.3. Software Development AcSELerator QuickSet AcSElerator RTAC #AcSELerator Diagrarn Builder 50 Setting Description Range Value BKlMTR Breaker I Manual Trip (SELogic) Valid range: The legal operators: AND OR NOT R TRIG F TRIG OCl OR PB8 PUL Table 9.1 : Example of SEL Relay Breaker Trip Tag In Figure 9.4, value is the tag monitored by the relay to trigger the assigned tag in settings.In this case, the setting is the breaker manual trip action. OC1 OR PB8_PUL is a pushbutton that triggers the manual trip when pressed. #ALARM ELEMENTS PSV34 '= IL{LAI{M OR SALARM Figure 9.3: Example of SEL Relay LED Alarm Light Protection Figure 9.3 shows an example of protection logic in the relay written in SELogic. PSV34 is a protection variable tag that the relay monitors for HALARM OR SALARM which are alarms for hardware failure or settings error. PSV34 points to an LED alarm light tag so the relay will turn on an LED light in response to hardware or settings failure. The relays also have alias tags to transmit information to the RTAC that will modifu the state of the visuals in the HMI. All of this is being done so that the automation controller can be used to interact with the microgrid in terms of battery control and load shedding. 5l Setting Description Range Value SITMl SER Points and Aliases, Point 1 Device Word Element, Alias Name, Asserted Text, DeAsserted Text, HMI Alarm 50P1,50P1, ASSERTED, DEASSERTED, Y Table 9.2:Example of Establishing Alias Relay Tag Table 9.3 shows a case where an alias tag is used as a value for an LED alarm light, and if asserted, the HMI will display a triggered LED light. Table 9. 3: Example of HMI Relay Trigger Tag In Table 9.3, the defined alias overcurrent element tag 50P1 will trigger the PB6_LED assigned LED light on the HMI. 9.4 GOOSE Protocol Communications The communications protocol used in this project is called General Object-Oriented Substation Events (GOOSE) protocol which was chosen because it was the best option available at the time to work with the RTDS. This protocol is described in the Intemational Setting Description Range Value PB6 LED Pushbutton LED 6 (SELogic) Valid range: The legal operators: AND OR NOT R TRIG F TRIG 50Pl 52 Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61850 standard for substations which enables the integration of all protection, control, measurement and monitoring functions [6]. GOOSE communication is a publisher-subscriber protocol that contains publisher and subscriber Intelligent Electronic Devices (IEDs). Publisher IEDs send data packets to the system while subscriber IEDs read data packets published by a given IED. To configure the publications and subscriptions, every IED must have a corresponding IED Capability Description (ICD) file. The ICD file provides a description of the items supported by an IED. ICD files for the devices that are to be interconnected on the same network are merged into the Substation Configuration Description (SCD) file. The SCD file is an XML based text file that describes the IEC-61850 compliant devices comprising a substation. An SCD file is often generated by an editor program which takes component capability f,rles (.icd files) and merges them into the .scd file. IEC standard 61850-6 defines the configuration description language for communication in electrical substations related to IEDs [6]. This is all done so that the automation controller can successfully communicate with the microgrid model developed in RSCAD. 9.5 The Human Machine Interface The Human Machine Interface (HMI) is the platform for cognition and communication between human and machine, and is the approach for information transmission [8]. The HMI facilitates this communication through the use of visuals designed to effectively convey the state of the running system. The HMI also allows the operator to control a system through the use of interactive visual controls, such as buffons, switches, and dials. [n order for the operator to make efficient use of these controls, it is necessary for the operator to quickly and accurately 53 understand the state of the system. The status of the substation can be conveyed to the operator in different ways. Colors, shapes, values and labels can all be used to transfer data to the operator. Figure 9.4 shows an example of how an HMI could be designed for a single breaker. When the breaker is open, the box turns red, and after an alarm is triggered, it flashes. The buttons below the box allow the operator to trip or close the breaker. Figure 9.4: HMI for One Breaker Bus voltages and line currents may also be added in the HMI to allow the user to monitor the transmission lines individually. Figure 9.5 is an example of recently labeled values giving information to the operator, for the operator to interpret. A Cunent0.0A B Orneril0.0A C Current 0.0 A A Voltage 0.0 kV B Voltage 0.0 kV C VottaEe0.0 kV Figure 9.5: Bus Voltages and Line Currents for One Relay Breaker 1 o CLOSE BREAXER TRIP BREAKER 54 9.6 Chapter 9 Summary Chapter t has discussed the purpose of an automation controller, which is to automate various control systems for operating equipment such as machinery, processes in factories, and other applications and vehicles with minimal or reduced human intervention [1]. Chapter discusses the steps needed in setting up an automation controller. Those steps include: hardware development, software development, HMI, and communication protocols. Chapter 10 goes over in detail future work for the automation controller. 55 Chapter 10 Summary of Accomplished Work and Future Work 10.0 Summary of Accomplished Work As this research project ended several valuable milestones were achieved in the pursuit of improving the microgrid. A major problem that often occurs in a microgrid is not being able to meet the demand of the system. This research project successfully designed and tested a load shedding scheme in RSCAD to deal with this issue. The load shedding scheme works by following a few simple steps. The first is to measure the voltage at all the busses throughout the microgrid and check those values to see if any of them fall below the tripping value. If any of these values fall below the tripping value of 0.9 per unit the load shedding scheme will select the lowest priority load and shed it. Currently load is only being shed. When more power is available an operator will manually have to bring the loads back online. Batteries as well as a battery controller have been added to the system to help keep loads from being shed when possible, but no combined simulations of load shedding and battery control were performed. This controller included commands such as when to charge, when to discharge, and how much to discharge. By doing those things a large portion of the microgrid area will continue to have power in the event of a blackout. This would be able to power critical loads the user selects which could include: hospitals, police stations, and government buildings. In conclusion the benefit gained from implementing a load shedding scheme and battery controller into the microgrid is the ability to keep the power on for critical loads during outages. 56 10.1 Future Work: Transfer of Automation Logic to RTAC The load shedding controller is designed to fi.rnction independently and would be fully realized if the control logic was taken from the RSCAD software and ported into an automation controller development environment. 10.2 Future Work Time Based Load Shedding The load-shedding controller will trigger the opening of breakers in a sequential manner. As implemented in simulation the only way to change the sequence is to alter the draft file's outputs from the controller. This would allow dynamic bus monitoring thought- out the year. With the change of seasons and temperature the hydro generation plus varies greatly as seen in Figure 10.1 []. There are various values of needed power during the course of the year and each day. The ability to change which loads are shed and what is critical to the stability of the microgrid. It should be noted that the system rarely be in island mode. In the event that happens the duration will be unknown. i,' ix, 25 20 l0 5 0 c$$$t!*ss$$sss$'F'b-b-b'b'F-}}$.slod Horrr d th. d.y -Spdn! elg6jn6l -Fall -Ulinte. Figure 10.1: Combined Solar and Hydro Average Generation Output Profile Over a24Hr Period in 4 Seasons [1] 5l 10.3 Future Work Fully Implementing Load Shedding in RTDS Hardware in Loop Simulation Moving the loads in RSCAD can be done by using the GTNET-SKT communication protocol functions to pass a date and time into the draft file. The GTNET-SKT protocol uses a LAN/WAN connection with the TCP or UDP sockets on the processor cards. With the proper configuration of the GTNET card(s) it should be possible to pass a date and time to the load-shedding controller. A user would then be able to write additional code to take the information from the GTNET card(s) and assign different load priorities during specific times of the day andlor or year. 10.4 Battery Control Future Work A preliminary battery controller was designed and presented in Chapter 7. It was attempted to go beyond the scope of the project and create abattery controller in RSCAD, but the project was over before it could be finished. The work that was completed is shown in Appendices D-F. In the RSCAD model when the battery controller and battery model were tested the battery controller measured the frequency performed a comparison, determined how much power should be supplied and absorbed, and then sent the command to the battery. The battery in tum supplied the correct amount of power, but introduced a transient into the system that never dampened out. The next step for this would be to determine if the battery or the controller is introducing the transient into the system and fix it. Once this is completed the battery control could be implemented in the microgrid with the load shedding scheme. 58 10.5 Future Work on Diesel to Natural Gas Conversion The next step has two parts. The first would be to perform a cost-benefit analysis of converting the diesel generators to the hybrid diesel/natural gas generator. This would be done to see if it the benefits are great enough to justiff the expense to install them. Step 2 would be performed if the kits were installed, which is to model the converted generators in RSCAD. Once modeled in RSCAD, a stability and transient study could be performed to see how the generators interact with the rest of the system and if they improve the quality of the microgrid. 10.6 Future Work Communication Between an RTDS and Automation Controller An RTDS can simulate complex networks that have been developed in the simulation software RSCAD. A GTNET card was used to interface the RTDS to the relay over a Local Area Network (LAN) connection using GOOSE protocol [9]. The work in Chapter 9 discussed creating an automation controller, but not the communication between an RTDS model and the automation controller. The SCD editor program within the GTNET-GSE function block facilitates the creation of the SCD file. To configure communication from the RTDS to the protective relay, outputs were added to the SCD editor. In Figure 10.2, both integer values and binary statuses were outputted to monitor and control the breakers, bus voltages, and breaker currents. 59 Edit D.tasd GOOSE_odpds_ l/G.bol DataSet Entries Float Deadb.nd lntoFlffit32-x d min ru 1.O -'t.0 - 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 'l 0 't.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.O '1.O .1.O 1.O 10 10 Floal32-2 1.O Float32-3 '1 O -1 O Floal32-4 1.0 -1.0 Float32-5 1 O -1.O 1.0 1.O 1.O 1.O "t.o 1.O 1.0 10 10 -1.0 -1.O -1.0 - 1.0 -1.0 - t.o -1.O -1 0 -'i.o Float32-'15 1.O -1.O Float32-16 1-O -1.O DataSet Preview ToK I Cancsl ; <FCDA ldlnst=-CTRL- prefx="ouT_" InClass=-GGIO- lnlnst='43' doName=-lntln' daName=-stval- tF Sr/><FCDA ldlnst='CTRL- preila:-OuT_- lnClass='GGIO- lnlnst='44- doName=-lntln- daName=-stval- fF Sr/> <FCDA ldlnst='CTRL' prel5x='OuT_' InClass='GGIO- lolnst='45- doName=-lntln' daName='stval'fc=-Sfh<FCDA ldlnst=-CTRL' prefix='OuT_' lnClass=-GGIO' lnlnst='46' doName=-lntln- daName='stval- fF-Sfr><FCDA ldlnst='CTRL- prefix='OuT_'InClaas='GGIO'lnlnst='4f doName=-lntln- daName='sval- fc=-Sff-<FCOA ldlnst=-CTRL- prefix=-OuT_^ InClass=-GGIO'Inlnst=-49- 60Name=Tnlln- daName=-swal-fc='Sf/><FCDA ldlnst=-CTRf prefix="OuT_- lnClass=-GGIO'Inlnst=-49' doName=-lntln- daName='sval- fc=-Sr/><FCDA ldlnst=-CTRf prefix="OuT_' InClass='GGIO- lnlnst=-50' doName=-lntln- daName='stval- fc='ST./> <FCDA ldlnst=-CTRL- prefir='OuT_'InClass='eGlO- lolnst=-51' doName='lntn- daName='slval- fF-Srf. <FCDA ldlnst=-CTRf prefix='OuT_- InClass=-GGIO- Inlnst=-52' doName=-lntln- daName='stval- fF ST-F<FCDA ldlnst=-CTRL- preix='OuT_' InGlass='GGIO- Inlnsl='53- doName=-lntln- daName='stval- fc=-Sfi"- Up lnsl O€lType Y ^A l A A v o 11 E* d V Vd E* E+ Y Y V E* t t Down Y Y Figure 10.2: Editing Outputs in the SCD file It is necessary that the parameters within the GTNET-GSE function block are edited to link information within the simulation to those outputs, as shown in Figure 10.3. x Float32-6 F loal32-7 Float32-E FIoat32-g Flost32-1 0 FIoat32-1 J Float32-1 2 FIoat32- 1 3 t Y Y 60 _rtds_GTllET_G SE_Y5.def CONFIGURATION Output Deadband Parameters 1 Signal RIUTX 1 lnput Slgnal Name#Types R)UTX 1 Output Retransmit Curve urationGOOSE Descripton Value bitnum (32.,11 Min .fI 0 0 1 I0 1 Name IED1DlT 101 IEDlOlB IED 11127 tED102 ED1O2B IEL 1O3T lED103 rtlf,-riiTt* 1 SignalName 1 Boolean bitmap bit num [32..1] 2 Signal Name 2 Boolean bitmap bit num (32..1) 3 SignalName 32 0 12 Update Cancel CancelAll TI rI IT Figure 10.3: GTNET-GSE Output Parameters The work described in this section is to determine how the automation controller communicates with the microgrid model built in RSCAD. 10.7 Future Work Establishing GOOSE Protocol Communications for the RTAC Designing and configuring SEL devices in IEC 61850 installations are possible by using AcSElerator Architect Software. This software provides a means of configuring and documenting the IEC 61850 communications settings between vendor-agnostic devices [0] Upon importing the SCD file extracted from RSCAD, GOOSE communication can be made accessible to the RTAC by packaging the data as directed by the IEC-61850 standard as shown in Figure 10.4. 6l E S€L45r.Gcb0l B CTRL r:i.OLT-GG|OI Llr lnd Commmt Control 1n.., 5P50001.3t... 950$1'q sPsmot.t sP5{Xn2.n... $rbrcribrd Data hem StL45l.GcH)l.CTRI.OUT_6GlOl.lnd-stValo "B .tcEI stVal Figure 10.4: Establishing GOOSE Protocol for the Relay The AcSElerator RTAC software configures the automation controller by uploading project files through a connected ethernet cable. GOOSE protocol is established in the RTAC once an architect file is imported into the project file. A virtual data map must then be created using tags to point to command settings to transmit and receive data using GOOSE protocol. 62 References tll Penkey, P. K. (2016). Critical Load Serving Capability by Microgrid Operation (Master's thesis, University of Idaho) (p. 32 to 49). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 12) UET.(n.d). Uni.System Grid-Scale Energy Storage Solution. Retrieved June 20th, 2017 from http://www.uetechnologies.com/imaees/product/UET-UniSystem_Product_SheetJeduced.p df t3l P. (2012, May 4). Bi-Fuel Enters the Digital Age.. . Introducing the EVO-SP@ System. Retrieved October 02,2017, from http://rvrvrv.sft-corp.com/industry.php/bifuel/ 14) GFS Corp. (".d.).Natural Gas Conversions for High Horsepower Diesel Engines Offering Substantial Fuel Cost Savings and Cleaner Emissions. Retrieved February 09, 2017, from http:i/www. gfs-corp.corn [5] Bennett, S. (1993). A History of Control Engineering 1930-1955. London: Peter Peregrinus Ltd. [6] Fernandes, Chilton, et al. "Testing of Goose Protocol of IEC6l850 Standard in Protection IED." International Journal of Computer Applications,vol.93, no. 16,2014,pp. 30-3 5., doi: I 0.5 l20l 16301-6112. 63 [7] Xuesong,Z'Liyang, Y., & Youjie, M. (2014). An Overview of Micro-Grid. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 552.l-6. [8] Gong, Chao. "Human-Machine Interface: Design Principles of Visual Information in Human-Machine Interface Design." Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, 2 009. IH MSC' 0 9. International Conference On, v ol. 2, 2009, pp. 262-265. [9] RTDS Technologies. Real Time Digital Simulation for the Power Industry: Manual Set. Winnipeg, MB [10] AcSElerator Architect Software. (n.d.). Retrieved May 18, 2017,from https :i/selinc.com/produ cts I 5032 I [11] Mahmoud, M., Hussain, S. A., & Abido, M. (2014). Modeling and control of microgrid: An overview. Journal of the Fronklin Institute, -151(5), 2822-2859. doi: I 0. 1 0 1 6/j jfranklin.2O 1 4.0 I .0 1 6 [12] Boungwook, C., Heechul, K., Mussab, A.M., & Seeley, N. C. (2008). The Application of a Redundant Load-Shedding System for Islanded Power Plants. 35th Annual Western Protective Relay Conference, l-10. 64 [13] Manson, S., Zweigle, G., & Yedidi, Y. (2014). Case Study: An Adaptive Underfrequency Load-Shedding System. Indus try Applic ations, I E E E Trans actions on, 50(3), t659-1667 [14] Ifuoposki, Lasseter, Ise, Morozumi, Papatlianassiou, & Hatziargyriou. (2008). Making microgrids work. Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE,6(3), IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, May-June 2008, Vol. 6(3 ). [5]N. Hatziargyriou, H. Asano, R. Iravani, and C. Marnay, 'Microgrids,' IEEE Power Energt Mog., vol. 5, no.4,pp.78-94,2007 [16] S. Parhizi, H. Lotfi, A. Khodaei and S. Bahramirad, 'State of the Art in Research on Microgrids: A Review,' in IEEE Access, vol. 3, no. , pp. 890-925,2015. doi: 1 0. 1 I O9/ACCESS.201 5 .2443119 [17] B. Kroposki, R. Lasseter, T. Ise, S. Morozumi, S. Papathanassiou, and N. Hatziargyriou, 'Making microgrids work,' IEEE Power Energy Mog., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 40- 53,2008. ll8) IEEE Guide for the Selection and Sizing of Batteries for Uninteruuptible Power Systems. Place of Publication Not ldentified, IEEE, 1995. [19] Nazaripouya, H., Wang, Y., Chu, P., Pota, H.R., & Gadh, R. (2015). Optimal sizing and placement of battery energy storage in distribution system based on solar size for voltage regulation. 2015 IEEE Power & Energl,, Society General Meeting doi: 1 0. 1 109/pesgm .2015 .7286059 [20] Thipse, S., Kavathekar, K., Rairikar, S., Tyagi, A. et al., "Development of Environment Friendly Diesel-CNG Dual Fuel Enginefor Heaty Duty Vehicle Application in India," SAE Technical Paper 2013-26-00L5,2013,https:lldoi.orgl10.4271l20l3-26-0015. [21] Studies of performance and emission characteristics of compressed natural gas fuelled S.I. engine and developing CNG conversion kit. (2013). IOSR Journal of Mechanical and C iv il E ngineering, 9 (4), 23 -29. doi : 1 0. 979 0 I | 684-09 42329 [22] Kolluri, S. V., Ramamurthy, J.R., Wong, S.M., Peterson, M., Yu, P., & Chander, M R. (2015). Relay-based undervoltage load shedding scheme for Entergys Westem Region. 20 1 5 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting. doi: 1 0. 1 109/pesgm .2015 .7285651 [23] Jensen, S. (2006, December 1). Converting Diesel Engines to Dual Fuel The Pros and Cons of Common Engine Types. Retrieved from https ;/iwww. energyconversi ons. com/whitepaperdual fuelengines [24]leee Pes Task Force on Real-Time Simulation of Power Energy Systems. "Real-Time Simulation Technologies for Power Systems Design, Testing, and Analysis." Power and Energy Technologt Systems Journal, IEEE, vol. 2, 201 5, pp. 631 3. 65 66 Appendix A: Truth Tables for Finite State Machine The truth table is apart of the proper design of a Finite State Machine. The table is used to map the State, Next State and Output logic. The input U_V signifies a signal from the RSCAD simulation model that will initiate the load shedding process. The input B_C is a signal from an external source that will send a signal to close arelay of the latest open load. Table A. l: State Transition Table With Encoding s UV BC s* SO 0 0 SO SO 0 1 s0 SO 1 0 s1 SO L 7 S1 S1 0 0 S1 S1 0 L SO S1 1 0 S2 S1 t L S2 S2 0 0 52 S2 0 1 s1 S2 t 0 s3 S2 1 1 S3 S3 0 0 S3 S3 0 L s2 S3 t 0 S4 S3 L 1.S4 S4 0 0 S4 S4 0 L S3 S4 1.0 S5 S4 1.L S5 ss 0 0 S5 0 t s4 S5 1.0 S5 S5 L 7 S5 Current State lnputs Next State S5 67 Table A. 2: Output Table With Encoding The outputs are integer that values will be passed to the breaker control relays in the RSCAD system. L4 L2 L1SL5L3 SO 0 0 0 0 0 LS10000 S2 0 0 0 7 L S3 0 0 1.1,t S4 0 L 1.1 L L 1 1.1.1 Current State Outputs S5 68 Appendix B: Next State and Output Logic Diagrams Appendix B is a collection of the FSM logic diagrams of the Boolean logic used in implementing the load shedding scheme. Figure B.1: 52 Logic Es,sht/_v'+s'rfi S E+s'r3[ ff u _v +siS[s.TlI +s'2Eso{/_v ,tj I *,t, I si S?'LogE l i iIlI[l I L-&t I I t -1 r I -t S 1 ' Logic u-{o1 I A\D AND ,i' A.\- IJ .{:\iD 69 Figure B.2: Sl Logic si -EEsnu_v +3Es,3rTF +3EsrS(J_v +Esrsh?,T .:T :}-T ;J 70 S0' Logic Figure B.3: S0 Logic "? -?0,,-,0 IA*E::l rt l I I , l:r ^,1, I @ I _.ti:l -"l'*l-'U *til L_) f*' F)-----JL-.J aI r ----J--lrj/-D-I I -f--lD_ t'' lI t_-, F\N 7l + szSsoTIT + &3fsnt.r-r L1 -E fis'" + .qrs,.5n + Es',sn + s'rE S + s'rf,sh Output Logic Load_l {\1!oH ,L\IJ rL\ir Figure 8"4: Output Logic Load I I*6 I l5* I 72 L2 -Es,S + E.5rsh + s'rE s- + szfso Figure B.5: Output Logic Load2 Oulput Logic Load 2 Lry9 hrxM oo.ftlaE AND r50i AND ANt)on AI\iD t3 Figure 8.6: Output Logic Load 3 L3 - E.i,so + S'rEt S + s'?Esh Output Logic Load_3 Gord turo2 Lqid OFar&A _{Nt) AND OR A-I\iIJ .'Q 74 SI SO togic!, Oomlor4 llgicd Orr.rorS Loticd Oprr*.16 TEmin!br1 TdnNlor Golo E lD2 Frmt Fm2 Fm6 Logtal Op!rurot L6rl Fm3 Fm,l Frm togGt Opcntol8Logrcl OpcEldl ANI) OR AND Figure B.7: Output Logic Load 4 La-sr["5o+SrEsn Output Logic Load_4 75 Output Logic Load_S S2 S1 SO Logical Operato14 Logical Operator5 Logical Operator6 Terminatorl Terminator Termlnator2 Golo Goto2 Goro5 Froml L0aLi5 From2 From Logical Operator Logical OperatorS [slNoTl IANDOR Figure B.8: Output Logic Load 5 L5 - S'rES', 16 ,il ! r3 Figure B.9: Overall Diagram of Finite State Machine in Simulink I I € E I fl I !u I ri{ EA I 77 Appendix C: RSCAD Files The figure below is the RSCAD CBuilder .def file of the load-shedding controller Figure C.1: Cbuilder.def File .h and .c files Header file: MODEL TYPE: CTL #define PI 3.1415926535897932384626433832795 // definition of PI #define TWOPI 6.283185307179586476925286766559 // definition of 2.0*PI #define E 2.71828182845904523536028747135266 // definition of E #define EINV 036787944117144232159552377016147 // definition of E Inverse (l/E) #define RT2 1.4142135623130950488016887242097 // definition of square root 2.0 #define RT3 1.7320508075688772935274463415059 // definition of square root 3.0 #define INV ROOT2 0.7 07 10678 I 1 86547 5244008443 6210485 NPUTS: int reset; double clock; double U*Y2; double U_V3; double U V4; !- -_.---r---_ ln, .,,,1 l: - ,r,ft ,il 9& d :!*r [& & aE lHk I f' rfff'Y'?rf T f ? ? T ?'+ f 'r?TT El|dMt6m tsd etry aEdr 0,ffi M S..ufs e*8 &d@ E& dEB> vud@r&ro&ih& vk{*Far&h* &d!o@aEd6h&t str{@!&8ffihfr vdErtq! rfts@.e hEd @ fta ffit* lwffficeoBl*! !lG_8_! Lbi 6l htulrl .106 M_U_IO lS d 614 r cb- @a ffi ,@. o ,1, 78 double U_V5; double U_V6; double U_V1; double B_C;int LOADSHED; OUTPUTS: int load1; intload2; int load3; int load4; int load5; PARAMETERS: double U_Vrange; //Range of undervoltage detection int prtyp; //Solve Model on card type: int FaultDelay; llDelay to rule out faults int Close BRK_t; llDelay until breaker(s) close double Close_BRK_Rg; //Range of voltage to close breakers int CloseLOAD3; llYalue of output int to close Breaker int CloseLOAD4; llYalue of output int to close Breaker int CloseLOADS; llYalue of output int to close Breaker int OpenLOADl; lNalue of output int to OPEN Breaker int OpenLOAD2; lNalue of output int to OPEN Breaker int OpenLOAD3; lNalue of output int to OPEN Breaker int OpenLOAD4; lNalue of output int to OPEN Breaker int OpenLOAD5; llYalue of output int to OPEN Breaker int CloseLOADl; llYalue of output int to close Breaker int CloseLOAD2; llYalue of output int to close Breaker C file: VERSION: 3.001 #include "loadshed.h" STATIC: ll double dt; // i through n are counters for load shed delay int i:0; 79 int j :0; int k: 0; int l:0; int m:0; int n:0; i/ v through z are counters for closing breakers int v: 0; int w:0; int x:0; int y:0; int z: 0; // These are the ints for initializing each state's counters int SO_init: 1; int Sl_init: 1; int S2_init: l; int S3_init: 1; int S4_init: 1; int S5_init: 1; int state: 0; int prev_clock : 1; // STATES DEFINED #define S0 0 #define S1 1 #defrne 32 2 #define 53 3 #define 54 4 #define 55 5 ll -End of STATIC: Section- RAM FUNCTIONS RAM PASSO: l/ ---------- End of RAM PASS0: Section RAM PASS2 80 ll ---------- End of RAM PASS2: Section //FTNITE STATE MACHINE LOGIC if(clock){ run if (!prev_clock) { prev_clock:l; if(LOADSHED:: 1){// Controller Will only shed load if this value is true switch(state){ case S0: if(So_init:: 1){ i:0;j:0; k:0; l:0; m:0; n:0; v:0; w:0; x:0; y:0; z:0; ) if((B_c &&((u_v 1 +u_v2+u_v3+u_v4+u_vs+u_v6y6)) > Close_BRK_Rg){ // This statement checks the bus voltages to reconnect a load state:S0;) if(U_Vl < U_Vrange){ if(i> FaultDelay){ state: Sl; ) else { i++; ) )J else {i:0; ) if(U_V2 < U_Vrange){ if(j> FaultDelay){ lllf statement that will use the clock to dictate when the code will be CODE: 81 state: Sl; j++; {j :0; if(U_V3 < U_Vrange){ if(k > FaultDelay){ state: Sl; ) else { k++; ) k:0; i(U_V4 < U_Vrange){ if(l> FaultDelay){ state: Sl; It else{ l++; ) J I :0; if(U_Vs < U_Vrange){ i(m> FaultDelay){ state : S l; ) else{ m*-l; ) else {I \tIJ else )I t \t else ) ) J else ) { 82 \t else {m:0; l J if(U_V6 < U_Vrange){ if(n> FaultDelay){ state : S 1; ) else{ n**; ) ) J else {n:0; \t S0_init: 0; break; case Sl: if(Sl init :: l)Ullnitialize the state counters i:0; j:0; k:0; l:0; m:0; n:0; v:0; w:0; x:0;50; z:0; \t if(B_c &&((u_v 1 +u_v2+u_v3 +u_v4+u_v5 +u_v6)/6))> Close_BRK_Rg) { if(v > Close_BRK_t){ SO_init: 1; state:S0; ) else {v**l II ) else { tJ V: O; 83 if(U_Vl < U_Vrange){ if(i> FaultDelay){ state: 52; ) else{ i++; ) ) else {i:0; ) if(U_V2 < U_Vrange){ if(> FaultDelay){ state: 52; ) else {j++; ) ) J else j :0; if(U_V3 < U_Vrange){ if(k> FaultDelar{ state: 52; ) else { k++; )\t else {k:0; ) if(U_V4 < U_Vrange){ ) 84 tI else { i(l> FaultDelay){ state: 52; \I else { l++; ) l:0; if(U_V5 < U_Vrange){ if(m> FaultDelay){ state: 52; ) else { m**l ) ) J else {m:0; IJ if(U_V6 < U_Vrange){ if(n> FaultDelay){ state: 52; ) else { n-l*; )It else {n:0; )Sl_init:0; break; if(S2_init:: 1){ i:0; j:0; k=0; l:0; m:0; n:0; II case 52: 85 ) v:0; w:0; x:0; y:0; z:0; if(B_c &&((u_v 1 +u_v2+u_v3 +u_v4+u_v5 +u_v6)/6)) > Close_BRK_Rg){ if(w > Close_BRK_t){ 51 init: l; state:S 1; ) else {w**l ) ) else {w:0; if(U_Vl < U_Vrange){ if(i> FaultDelay){ state: 53; ) else { i++; ) ) else {i:0; i(U_V2 < U_Vrange){ if(j> FaultDelay){ state: 53; 'I J else{ j++; ) \t If ) else {j:o; 86 if(U_V3 < U_Vrange){ if(k> FaultDelay){ state: 53; ) else { k++; ) k:0; if(U_V4 < U_Vrange){ if(l> FaultDelay){ state: 53; ) else { l++; ) I :0; if(U_V5 < U_Vrange){ if(m> FaultDelay){ state: 53; ) else { m**; ) m:0; if(U_V6 < U_Vrange){ if(n> FaultDelay){ (t ) else t{ t \t else \t (\ ) else 'II 87 state: 53; ) else { n*-l; ) )J else {n:0; ) S2_init: 0; break; case 53: if(S3_init:: 1){ i:0; i:9' k:0; l:0; m:0; n:0; v:0; w:0; x:0;50; z:0; if(B_c && (u_v 1 +u_v2+u_v3 +u_v4+u_vs +u_v6)/6))> Close_BRK_Rg) { if(x > Close_BRK_t){ S2_init: l; state:S2; ) else {xt*; ) ) else{ x 0; \t if(U_Vl < U_Vrange){ if(i> FaultDelay){ state: 54; ) else{ i++; ) ) else { ) 88 i :0; )I if(U_V2 < U_Vrange){ iffi> FaultDelay){ state: 54; ) else {j++; ) ) else ( 1 j 0 ) if(U_V3 < U_Vrange){ if(k> FaultDelay){ state: 54; ) else{ k++; ) ) else {k:0; \t if(U_V4 < U_Vrange){ if(l> FaultDelay){ state: 54; ) else { l++; ) ) else { ) l:0; 89 if(U_Vs < U_Vrange){ if(m> FaultDelay){ state: 54; I J else {m**l ) ) else{ m:0; tt if(U_V6 < U_Vrange){ if(n> FaultDelay){ state: 54; ) else { n**; ) ) else {n:0; ) S3_init:0; break; case 54: if(S4_init:: 1){ i:0; j:0; k:0; l:0; m:0; n:0; v:0; w:0; x:0;50; z:0; II i((B_c && ((u_v I +u_v2+u_v3 +u_v4+u_vs +u_v6)/6))> Close_BRK_Rg){ i(y > Close BRK_t){ S3_init: 1; state:S3; ) else { y++; ) 90 ) else {y:0; if(U_V1 < U_Vrange){ IJ ) ) else{ if(U_V2 < U_Vrange){ if(i> FaultDelay){ state: 55; ) else { i++; ) i:0; if(> FaultDelay){ state: 55; ) else {j++; \t if(k> FaultDelay){ state: 55; ) else { k++; ) ) else fI J if(U_V3 < U_Vrange){ 0; ) ) else{ k:0; 9t ) i(U_V4 < U_Vrange){ ) else \t else l:0; ) if(U_Vs < U_Vrange){ if(l> FaultDelay){ state: 55; ) else { l++; ) if(m> FaultDelay){ state: 55; ) else {m**; ) if(n> FaultDelay){ state: 55; ) else { n**; m:0; ) if(IJ_V6 < U_Vrange){ )\t else{ n:0; ) S4_init: 0; break; case 55: 92 if(S5_init:: l){ i:0; j:0; k:0; l:0; m:0; n:0; v:0; w:0; x:0;50; z:0; ) i f((B_c && ((u_v r +u_v2+u_v3 +u_v4+u_vs +u_v6)/6)) > Close_BRK_Rg){ if(z> Close_BRK_t){ S4_init: l; state:S4; ) else{ z*1; ) ) else{ Z:0; S5_init: 0; break; if(!clock){ prev_clock:0;) i(reset){ state: S0;) // OUTPUT LOGIC CloseLOAD# AND OpenLOAD# ARE PARAMETERS ) )\t ) if(state::S0){ loadl : CloseLOADl; load2: CloseLOAD2; load3 : CloseLOAD3; load4: CloseLOAD4; load5 : CloseLOAD5; ) if(state::S 1) { loadl : OpenLOADl; //SO ALL OF THESE WOULD BE I'S // THIS OUTPUT WOULD BE 8. AND SO ON. )J 93 load2: CloseLOAD2; load3 : CloseLOAD3; load4: CloseLOAD4; load5 : CloseLOAD5; \t i(state::S2){ loadl : OpenLOADl; load2: OpenLOAD2; load3 : CloseLOAD3; load4: CloseLOAD4; load5 : CloseLOAD5; \t if(statr:S3){ loadl : OpenLOADl; load2: OpenLOAD2; load3 : OpenLOAD3; load4: CloseLOAD4; load5 : CloseLOAD5; ) if(state::S4) { loadl : OpenLOADl; load2: OpenLOAD2; load3 : OpenLOAD3; load4: OpenLOAD4; load5 : CloseLOAD5; ) J if(state::S5) { loadl : OpenLOADl; load2: OpenLOAD2; load3 : OpenLOAD3; load4: OpenLOAD4; load5 : OpenLOAD5; ) ll ------------ End of CODE: Section 94 Appendix D: Battery Controller Coding #include "Ctr_Batt.h" STATIC: int prev_CLK,state; ll -End of STATIC: Section- RAM-FLINCTIONS: RAM-PASSO: setStackingload( this_, 10, ""); llThis may need to be removed depending on the version RSCAD ll ---------- End of RAM PASSO: Section RAM-PAS52: prev_CLK:O; state:O; ll ---------- End of RAM PASS2: Section CODE: if(clK) { if(lprev_ClK){ /iRising Edge of Clock prev_ClK:l; if(!L_in){ state:0; ) else if(!W_in){ ext State Logic------ switch(state){ case (0): if(High_Freq<:Freq){ state:l; ) else i(Low_Freq>:Freq) { state:5; ) else { state:0; ) break; case (1): if(High_Freq<:Freq){ state:2; ) else if(Low_Freq>:Freq) { 95 state:O; ) else { state:l ; ) break; case (2): if(High_Freq<:Freq) { state:3; ) else if(Low_Freq>:Freq) { state:l; ) else{ state:2; ) break; case (3): if(High_Freq<:Freq){ state:4; ) else i(Low_Freq>:Freq) { state:2; ) else{ state:3; ) break; case (4): if(High_Freq<:Freq){ state:4; )J else if(Low_Freq>:Freq) { state:Z; ) else { state:3; ) break; case (5): i(High_Freq<:Freq){ state:0; ) else if(Low_Freq>:Freq) { state:6; lJ 96 else{ state:5; ) break; case (6): if(High_Freq<:Freq){ state:5; ) else if(Low_Freq>:Freq) { state:7; ) else{ state:6; ) break; case (7): if(High_Freq<:Freq){ state:6; ) else if(Low_Freq>:Freq) { state:S; ) else{ state:7; ) break; case (8): if(High_Freq<:Freq){ state:6; ) else if(Low_Freq>:Freq) { state:8; ) else { state:1; ) break; \t ) ) else { prev_CLK:0; ) I I -----------Output Logic------ switch(state){ ) 97 0:case case 2 J case 4: case 5: C_out:0; P_out:0; State:1; L_out:0; W_out:0; break; C_out:l; P_out:0; State:l; L_out:0; W_out:l; break; C_out:l; P_out:0; State:2; L_out:0; W_out:l; break; C_out-l; P_out:O; State:3; L_out:0; W_out:l; break; C_out:l; P_out:0; State:3; L_out:-l; W_out:l; break; C_out:0; P_out:l; State:1; L_out:0; W_out:l; break; C_out:0; P_out:l; State:2; I case case case 6: 98 case 7: case 8: L_out:0; W_out:l; break; C_ouF0; P_out:l; State:3; L_out:0; W_out:l; break; C_out:0; P_out:l; State:3; L_out:l; W_out:l; break; I J Appendix E: Battery Power System Coding #include "Battery3.h" STATIC: // Static Variables to be used throughout the function int prev_ClK,start; double Energy,VA,prev_IA,power; double Loss2:1.09091; double Loss3:l .45455; ll -End of STATIC: Section- RAM_FLINCTIONS: RAM-PASSO: setStackingload( this_, 10, ""); l/ ---------- End of RAM PASSO: Section RAM PASS2: ll Initial values in the system this section of // of code is only ran once at the beginning of // the simulation Energy : Inital_Energy; prev_IA:O; prev_CLK:0; start: I ; power:0; CODE: BEGIN TO: // RSCAD uses the current injections to calculate // the voltage of the system in BEGIN_TO currents for ll thebattery is considered to be a balanced system // using the previous value determined at the end ll of the code initializedatzerothe current is set 99 ll ---------- Endof RAM PASS2: Section 100 TO T2: IA:prev_IA; IB:IA; IC:IA; IG:-I *(IA+IB+IC); VA:A-I-V-2; if(CLK){ //Clock High if(lprev_Cl-K){ // Rising Edge of Clock prev_ClK:l; switch(State){ //State defined by controller case (l): if(!vA){ power:O; ) else if(P_in){ if(Max_Discharge<(Energy-Power I )) { power:-Powerl; Energ5(Energy-Power 1 ) ; ) else { power:O; ) ) else if(C_in){ if(Max_Charge>(Energy+Power I )) { power:Powerl; Energ5Energy+Powerl; ) else{ power:0; ) ) else { power:O; ) break; case (2): if(!vA){ power:0; ) else if(P_in){ if(Max_Discharge<(Energy-Power2 * Loss2)) { power:-Power2; l0l Energ5(Energy-Power2 * Loss2); ) else { power:0; )It else if(C_in){ if(Max_Charge>(Energy+Power2 * Loss2)) { power:Power2; Energ5Energy*Power2 * Loss2 ; ) else{ power:0; ) ) else{ power:0; ) J break; case (3): if(!vA){ power:O; ) else i(P_in){ i(Max_Discharge<(Energy-Power3 * Loss3 )) { power:-Power3; Energ5(Energy-Power3 * Loss3 ); ) else { power:O; ) ) else i(C_in){ if(Max_Charge>(Energy+Power3 * Loss3 )) { power-Power3; Energ5Energy*Power3 * Loss3 ; ) else{ power:0; ) ) else ) break; power:O; ) J t02 ) ) else { prev_CLK:0; ) if(vA){ prev_IAloweri (VA * B ase_Power) ; ) else { prev_IA:0; ) Monitored Variables-- En:Energy;//Stored energy in Battery P_out:power; //Power out of Battery IMON:prev_IA; l/Ctment of a single phase out of Battery ll ------------ End of CODE: Section 103 Appendix F: Software and Hardware Used in Automation controller Development . SEL-5030 AcSElerator Quickset software: used to configure and commission the SEL-451 Protection, Automation, and Bay Control System.. SEL-5032 AcSBlerator Architect software: used to configure Generic Object- Oriented Substation Events (GOOSE) Communications.. SEL-5033 AcSElerator RTAC software: used to configure the SEL-3530 Real-Time Automation Controller (RTAC).. SEL-5035 AcSElerator Diagram Builder software: enabled the creation of a Human-Machine Interface (HMD.. SEL-3530 Real-Time Automation Controller (RTAC): contains automation logic and sends commands to the SEL-45 1 to act upon it. It also supplies data to the HMI.o SEL-451 Protection, Automation, and Bay Control System: measures values off of the transmission lines and controls the connected breaker according to commands sent from the RTAC. APPENDIX G Final Report: GAES Water Energy Conseruation Aig//,sra Introduction: The growing demand on energy and water supplies jeopardizes the balance between food production and energy and water use. Food processing is one of the largest consumers of water and energy in the Pacific Northwest. Because of this, the Northwest Food Processors Association (NWFPA) has a goal for its 450 members to reduce energy consumption 50o/oby 2030. Savings to date has been accomplished by making simple and obvious changes. The goal of this study is to assist in reducing energy consumptionby analyzing process systems at Litehouse Foods inc, a member of the NWFPA, and create process models that can be used to discover new changes that can be made to increase efficiency that may not seem as simple or obvious. Litehouse is a refrigerated salad dressing company headquartered in Sandpoint, ID where its oldest production facility is also located. Litehouse is located within the Avista Utilities coverage area in the state of Idaho and meets the scope of both Avista Utilities and the University of Idaho. The process models created use the system specifications present at the Litehouse facility but include capabilities to be implemented and used at in other Avista customer facilities. The models serve to show current energy and water usage, and can be manipulated to model potential process improvements that can help reduce total consumption. Litehouse: Influence for models: The refrigeration systems at Litehouse were chosen for modeling and efficiency purposes after it was determined that there would be significantly more energy saved in changing refrigeration practices compared to process equipment. The production process itself is very dynamic and flexible. Process equipment can be brought on and off line several times throughout the day with inconsistent run schedules day to day and week to week. The processes themselves involve mixing ingredients in large mixing tanks to produce the desired product and then packaging these products and storing them before sending them to the customer. The nature of batch production coupled with the inconsistent production schedule makes it difficult to determine any kind of potential energy efficiencies issues. tn addition, the typical production motor size is 5 hp with arare case reaching as high as 20 hp, the lack of an automated system, and a largely human controlled production process all contribute to the lack of a need for modeling to determine better efficiency in the processes themselves. Due to the perishable nature of Litehouse products, refrigeration is the major energy consumption at their production facility. From ingredient storage to the shelf at the local grocery store, Litehouse's goal is to maintain a constant temperature of 38oF. This is achieved using refrigerated storage tanks, refrigerated mixing tanks, a refrigerated warehouse, and refrigerated truck trailers, all with a set point of 38oF. As the customer base has grown so has the Litehouse facility in Sandpoint. Higher production demands and aoosciated deadlines has led to a larger production facility through add- ons and repurposing of building space. New refrigeration and air conditioning equipment has been brought online to meet the production demands with little to no delay; however, no overall capacity or efficiency studies have been performed on these systems. The result is the capability to meet production quotas and temperature set points for all storage tanks and areas on site but liule information on how oversizedthe whole facility might be. Observations on efficiency practices: There are some refrigeration practices that could improve the overall energy efficiency of the Sandpoint facility. While examining the facility there were many current practices that should be considered for change to improve the energy usage of the facility. The current system design houses the large refrigeration compressors in the mechanical room on the southeast side of the building. The expansion valves and evaporators on these systems are housed within the walk-in refrigerator on the southwest side of the building. The building schematics shown in Figure I show the layout of the ground floor of the Sandpoint facility. Based on the dimensions of the walk-in refrigerator provided by Litehouse (105' x 125'x 30') the approximate scale of the layout indicates that the mechanical room has a 150'-200' of pipe to and from the walk-in refrigerator. This design, although simple from a maintenance standpoint, provides long lengths of pipe for increased pressure drop and temperature change of the refrigerant in these pipe segments. These sections of pipe are also not insulated, which increases the heat gain in the refrigerant flow in the pipes. This is not the only area where the piping is uninsulated. Generally, all refrigerated pipes remain uninsulated resulting in overall loss of capacity in the refrigeration systems. The glycol shell-and-tube heat exchanger attached to a new 100-ton chiller is also uninsulated. This chiller is used to create a glycol-water mixture at l8oF to provide refrigeration to 8 processes and three ingredient storage tanks. The uninsulated heat exchanger has instead been insulated by a thick layer of ice making the outer diameter of the pipe an estimated 8 in. Assuming this is 2-inch pipe, there is an extra 3- -e?4(5 I 1) l.1 ts-t [ ,^: fu(e I ra = S{'oZtoSi (,.o* g*'tc) inches of pipe around the piping of the heat exchanger. Although ice is colder than the ambient air during the warmer months of the year, there is still a l4"F difference between the outside pipe surface temperature and the temperature of the glycol-water loop. This temperature difference is even higher for the refrigerant side of the heat exchanger. This temperature difference could be 1of ft !o$t {-t\ P-cot .o.' !a'.+I c I n .)-+s 6lol E f EJ.: r-::la:3 l-tr:a <-==l4 &5 il+ @ largely decreased by having insulation on the pipes resulting in an outside pipe surface temperature much closer to that of the refrigerant or glycol inside the pipe. There is also a 150-ton cooling tower above the mechanical room which is currently connected to one of the refrigeration loops that uses a water-cooled condenser. This is the only system that is connected to the tower. Previously there were a total of three system connected to the cooling tower utilizing almost the entire capacity. With only one system connected to the tower currently, the tower is oversized which results in a freezing problem during the winter months. A heater must be used on the water inlet pipe to the cooling tower to keep the water in the tower from freezing. Not only is the capacity of the cooling tower unused, but there is an increased use of energy while heating the water during winter months of operation. The walk-in refrigerator is not the only refrigerated room at the facility. An additional refrigerated storage space was created by adding refrigeration at 38oF to a room which became a spice cooler. This cooler is also labeled in Figure 1. The walls in the room are a typical dry-wall construction, providing little insulation value. tn addition, there is no mechanism to remove the moisture from the air as the water condenses out of the air. This has led to an increased use of energy to maintain the room at the set point and water damage to the walls and ceiling which has resulted in collapsed walls and ceiling, leading to increased maintenance. This work could easily have been avoided by taking the proper steps to properly convert the storage space into a refrigerator. In addition to refrigeration, air conditioning is also being considered. After new corporate headquarters were finished in Sandpoint, the majority of the office space at the plant was emptied. Some of the office space has been converted to a laboratory. This entire space had been air conditioned by a large compressor connected to a glycol-water heat exchanger. Because this office space in now empty, only one of the five air handlers on this system is in use to air condition the new laboratory. This air-conditioned area is outlined in yellow in Figure 2 which shows the layout of the upper floor at the Litehouse facility. The compressor runs constantly and'hot water" is used to evaporate the refrigerant that is not evaporated from the glycol loop. This increases the amount of water used and adds to the overall oversizing of the refrigeration and .*.r 1 f, &*t*Jtf.'-1 lr,. *1T, Z( trc lr* =]6,?1?f ft(n^a"c f**d J I +-{ I J : H+tH Figure 2 Loyout of the upper floor of the Litehouse focility in Sandpoint, lD ;: t_t^--r-l-- r"*lJ ,.. air conditioning systems at the plant while increases the amount of wasted energy from the system which runs constantly. Modelling: The research team based at the Idaho Falls campus of the University of Idaho set out to assist in determining refrigeration capacities and requirements, and to provide recommendations to Litehouse. These recommendations will help to improve overall energy efficiency and save in operating costs. Additionally, the team will provide Avista Utilities with models that can be used to simulate similar systems to assist in further energy efficiency projects. This was done by creating 5 models: 4 using Aspen-HYSYS and the 5th model using Python code. Software: Aspen-HYSYS is industry standard software with basic components such as pumps, compressors, turbines, piping, chemical columns, chemical reactors, valves, heat exchangers, and other unit operations used to simulate thermal and./or chemical processes. The software also has the capability to design specific modules using a combination of built-in components, spreadsheet calculations, and other information. The software uses a large database of thermodynamic, fluid, and thermal properties for a wide variety of gases, liquids, and solids as well as accurate mixture calculations for multiple components in the same stream. This is beneficial when using a working fluid that is a combination of several built-in fluids such as R- 407C, the refrigerant used at Litehouse for their refrigeration temperatures. HYSYS operates in both steady state and transient modes allowing for real time energy and water usage calculations based on real time demands. Python is a widely used high-level programming language for general-purpose programming. As an interpreted language, Python has a design philosophy that emphasizes code readability, and a syntax that allows programmers to express concepts in fewer lines of code than might be used in other languages. The language provides constructs intended to enable writing clear programs on both a small and large scale. The model developed for this project primarily uses Python's mathematical coding syntax within the open-source Anaconda software with few logical inputs and statements. HYSYS Models Introduction and Assumptions: The Aspen-HYSYS models represent four different refrigeration system designs presently in operation at Litehouse foods. 1. Refrigeration cycle with air-cooled condenser 2. Refrigeration cycle with water-cooled condenser and cooling tower 3. Residential Air Conditioning Cycle 4. Air Conditioning using a refrigerant-glycol heat exchanger The models created are based on designs, layouts, and set points at the Litehouse Sandpoint production facility and contain the basic components of a refrigeration cycle: compressor, condenser, expansion valve, and evaporator, with pressure drop and ambient temperature interaction capabilities using pipe segments. The models were created from an operational standpoint and not a design standpoint. This means that equipment specifications for duties, temperatures, and pressures were used in the models to compare simulated results to measured results. Using process parameters eliminates the need to design equipment modules within the program and allows for easier usability and implementation of current or suggested cycle conditions. Process parameters were obtained only on the cycles represented in model 1 and model 2 and they are tabulated in Table 1. Each model will contain two different circuits: one which models the condensers and evaporators as heaters and coolers only, the other uses shell-and-tube heat exchangers to evaluate the air temperatures from the evaporators and the air or water temperatures in the condensers. By using heaters and coolers only, the duties of the heat transfer equipment may be specified from literature data or determined by the model to assist in the design of the refrigeration system. Heat exchangers must also be used in order to determine the required heat exchanger design aspects for the tube side of each heat exchanger. It is important to ensure that proper engineering judgement be used in the design work and that there will be no temperature cross from the design of the refrigeration system. The measured values from Table I were used as inputs into models I and2 along with several assumptions. The following assumptions were used in order to complete models 1and2. l. Refrigerant flow rate is solved for by HYSYS assuming 7 5oh adiabatic efficiency in the compressor 2. Pipe outer surface temperature is the assumed refrigerant temperature (all cycles) 3. Pipe pressure drop is only considered for long lengths of pipe 4. Temperature inlet to evaporators is set by good engineering judgement 5. Expansion valve is controlled to produce evaporator inlet temperature 6. Relative humidities inside are assumed Parameter Cycle I Cycle 2 Compressor Suction Pressure 35 psi 25 psi Compressor Suction Temp 40'F 57.5'F Compressor Discharge Press 210 psi 1 90 psi Compressor Discharge Temp 164.2"F 200"F Compressor Motor HP 40 hp 50 hp Condenser Tube-Side Inlet T 163.5'F 145.7'F Condenser Tube-Side Outlet T 88.3"F 740F Condenser Shell-Side Inlet T 73.4"F 69.4"F Condenser Shell-Side Outlet T 85.4"F 13.4"F Evaporator Tube-Side Delta T 80F 80F Coolins Tower Air Inlet T N/A 73.4"F Cooling Tower Air Outlet T N/A 70.4"F Cooling Tower Water Inlet T N/A 73.4"F Cooling Tower Water Outlet T N/A 69.4"F 7. "Hot water" is 76oF at 25 psi and a flow rate of 150 gpm 8. Compressor suction conditions are set points controlled by evaporator pressure regulator and hot water These assumptions were made to complete the model since not all operating parameters were available for measurement. [n order to make several of these assumptions some justification and/or explanation is needed. Assumption 1: The circuit itself is controlled by the inlet pressure set point and the volume displacement capacity of the compressor. By using a reciprocating compressor with the specified temperatures, pressures, power, and efficiency, the built-in HYSYS solver produces the resulting mass flow rate. Assumption 2: The temperatures on all unit operations were measured using and infrared temperature gun, measuring the outer surface temperature of the pipe. The estimated outside air temperature was 73.4"F (from weather underground at Sandpoint, ID on June 7 ,2017 at 1 1:30 AM). When comparing the thermal resistances of the three modes of heat transfer: outside convection, conduction through pipe, and inside convection, the dominant resistance is the outside convection resistance. R1res x 0'7 Rcond =( 0'01 Ryorced =( 0.001 In addition, the comparison between the forced convection and the conduction leads to the condition that the fluid temperature will be almost exactly equal to the inside pipe surface temperature. Assumption 3: An ideal refrigeration cycle uses two pressures with the pressures changing at the compressor and the expansion valve. The pressure drop through the condenser and the pipe up until the expansion valve can theoretically be disregarded entirely since the valve is controlled to produce the pressure and temperature on the evaporator inlet. In addition, the pressure drop returning to the compressor is in the end controlled by the evaporator pressure regulator which will return the pressure to the design suction pressure for the system. However, pipe segments have been included in the models when judged to be necessary to account for pressure drop and temperature change due to ambient conditions, as well as serve for further instruction on HYSYS use for implementation by Avista or other customers. Assumption 4: The set point for the refrigerated systems is 38'F and the assumed set point for air conditioned systems is 76'F. When designing a heat exchanger, a temperature difference of 1OoF is required on either side of the exchanger, whether it be counter-flow, co-current, or T cross flow. In this case, the evaporators and r r'' air-cooled condensers are cross flow, and the water-cooled condenser is assumed to be Tt.* Tr,t stream I strearn 2counter-flow. The evaporators are the Trol exchangers of concern for this assumption, because the condensers have large temperature differences. The duty of the evaporators is set by the temperature change of the refrigerant (8"F), so the inlet and outlet temperatures must produce around 1OoF temperature difference between the two fluids on both sides of the heat exchanger. Assumption 5: This has been addressed in other justifications. The evaporator inlet temperature on the refrigerant side is determined using good engineering judgement, and the expansion valve creates the pressure drop necessary to produce the designed temperafure. Assumption 6: The relative humidity of the refrigerators is assumed to be close to 100% due to the low temperature set point. We have assumed 95%.In other locations of the production facility, steam is used to clean equipment and surrounding to prevent contamination during food processing. This produces a higher mass fraction of water in the air. The relative humidity of the air conditioned areas is assumed tobe l7o/o. Assumption 7: Model 4 was created based on a system currently at Litehouse which uses a 40 ton compressor for glycol air conditioning. After new corporate headquarters were finished in Sandpoint, the office space was almost entirely emptied resulting in the areas being mothballed. Of the 5 air handlers on the glycol cycle, only one is in operation. However, in order to evaporate the remaining refrigerant that is not being heated due to fewer air handlers, 'hot water" is used. This "hot water" only needs to warmer than the refrigerant to perform its task. The HYSYS models show that to make-up the required heat, only a small amount of industrial water at this temperature is required (Delta T:?). This "hot water" heat exchanger has been included in models I and 2 in addition to model 4 in order to account for the temperature discrepancy between the evaporator outlet temperature and the compressor inlet temperature. Assumption 8: In order to create a steady state model, there needs to be a static set point in the system. This was determined to be the inlet conditions of the compressor because these conditions describe the rest of the process. -ru,j.,a, ]1v r.nl ll q sr"*o sllo Models L andZ *i-,J D*r7-4,Fsad" iFr-tE s'ilL i t Osor4, P' (. .at Figure 3 Evaporotor loyout of the wolk-in refrigerotor ot the Litehouse focility in Sandpoint, lD Models I and2 represent the two refrigeration cycles responsible for maintaining the walk-in refrigerator at 38"F. The facility products are moved into the walk-in refrigerator from the production floor to be stored and prepared for transportation to the customer retail stores. This walk-in refrigerator is 105' x 125' and is 30' tall. Figure 3 shows the room with the layout of the 12 evaporators from models I and 2 as well as what each door into the refrigerator connects to. Model 1 is connectedtothe2 evaporators along the east wall at the south end ofthe room and the 3 evaporators across the middle of the room. Model 2 is connected to the 7 evaporators along the north end of the room. Each cycle only has only one expansion valve for all the evaporators and the refrigerant tees off of the main manifold and forms a return manifold. Each evaporator is 7.5 tons and there is an auto defrost control system that removes the ice build-up on 2 compressors at a time for a 30- minute cycle. This means that at any given time only 10 evaporators have refrigerant flow, 4 from one cycle, and 6 from the other. Figure 4 and Figure 5 are shown below. These are the two circuits that make up model l. The circuits use R-407C which is a mixture of three refrigerants: Difluoromethane (R-22,23%by mass), Pentafluoroethane (R-125, 25%by mass), and 1, I, 1,2-tetrafluoroethane (R-134a, 52Yo by mass). The refrigerant is specified by using the mass fractions of the three different components in as the composition for the working fluid. The equipment used in the models is marked and the specifications are included in the description. The weather data used for the outside conditions was taken from weather underground at the time and date that the temperature and pressure measurements were taken. g o-'t11 3 1. HX-'100 Figure 4 Model 1 without heat exchongers 265 7 E-102 E-l04 HX-102 MX-101 19 E-103 TEE.I03 TtE-102 8 65 2 Figure 5 Model l with heat exchangers 7 3 M!( 1&2 T= 1.1. Carrier 5H40 compressor with a 40 HP motor Efficiency, HP, temperafure and pressure of suction and discharge Flow Rate: 4045.09lb|hr I Bohn air-cooled condenser with four condensing fans on a single circuit Refrigerant inlet and outlet temperatures, Air inlet temperature and flowrate, pressure drops in both shell side and tube side Outlet Air Temperature: 86.03'F Duty: 401079 Btulhr 2 Outlet Pressure: 38.17 psi Pressure Drop: 143.8 psi Outlet Temperature: 130F Vapor Fraction: 0.2896 3 Standard expansion valve which serves all 5 evaporators Outlet pressure to achieve desired evaporator inlet temperature Outlet Air Temperature 22"F Duty: 71517 Btulhr SoF temperature change across refrigerant line, pressure drops in both shell side and tube side, air inlet temperature and flow rate 5-7.5 ton evaporators4 "Hot Water" shell-and- Outlet temperature equal to Outlet Water Temperature5 Specification ResultUnit(s) Description t'rs{ ! l'la 3 TaE 1'l? 2 $D{ i(a 2 i l,It 2 4 ! liXl tube heat exchanger compressor suction temperature, water inlet pressure, temperature, and flow rate 75.87'F Duty: 14285 Btu/hr 6 Evaporator Pressure Regulator Outlet pressure equal to compressor suction pressure Outlet Pressure: 35 psi Pressure Drop: 0.67 psi 7 Vertical pipe segment to roof Outer and Inner diameters, length, elevation change, ambient temperature, average heat transfer coefficient Pressure Drop: 0.61 psi Temperature Change: 0.922"F 8 Horizontal pipe segment Outer and Inner diameters, to expansion valve length, elevation change, ambient temperafure, average heat transfer coefficient Pressure Drop: 17.45 psi Temperature Change: 2.14"F The tees follow the same pattern as the diagram in Figure 3, with an equal division of mass flow. In the current set up, only one of the two evaporators along the east wall is operating and the three across the middle of the room are operating. The refrigerant flow rate is divided equally among these four evaporators. In reality, this is not exactly the case; however, it is close enough using this assumption. The average heat transfer coefficient is the same natural convection heat transfer coefficient used in assumption 2 for natural convection around the pipe. Model 2 will be presented and follow a similar results analysis as model 1 Model 3 Figure 6 shows an aerial view of the Litehouse facility. Several locations have been marked above the building to show relative locations. The circled and numbered boxes outline several residential air conditioners in place. The sizes of the air conditioners are included as well as the areas that they serve and their approximate square footage, where known. On June 7,2017 none of these air conditioning units were operating so no measured data was available for the model. The model is created assuming the validity of models I and2 and is designed based on the duty designations of actually residential air conditioning units. An additional concern with the air handlers in the building is the condensation build-up on the coils. There are four air handlers in the production floor which are constantly dripping condensate into the area. Steam is used for cleaning the equipment and floors in the production floor resulting in a relative humidity close to 100% at all times. This condensate is not healthy for a food production facility and is a constant concern for maintenance. Additionally, the chemical used to clean the filters needs to be compliant with food processing facilities adding another load on the maintenance crew. The suggestion to Litehouse is to improve the residential units to an industrial air conditioning system with the refrigeration cycle housed on the roof and extensive duct work providing conditioned air to the facility. -L.'dl The purpose of model 3 is to help determine the current cooling load on the floorplan and the energy load on the individual systems. This will assist in finding the proper industrial air conditioner to apply to the facility.r-r - ";f tt: ?'zf'" lrr.:r tij h tt 4-. Z -5+o c$&.&,.{*irs E. en.,u.t% = tae ?.e *a J Z. Z.f r.. *jlr t. F^+*- a'ir{t :z ro1+6i, ldi l. -tr r'^ 6n'['J brtr'rro- (* ''&l H r, L/r lor otd yi'rt o^\f t -3 ia' t: ',' ^x- no!' ,--1s 5.5 t. $r 9rr{'u't'-o&&'s 'z G:5 Cf i t * ttr. ilt* \ana'u ror* < r*o 3e1 Figure 6 Aeriol view of the Litehouse focility in Sandpoint, lD Model 3 will be presented and follow a similar results analysis as model 1 Model4: Model4 will be presented and follow a similar results analysis as model I Python Model: The model created with python code is a mathematical representation of the environmental, human, and mechanical load on a rectangular room. The purpose of this model is to help determine the approximate size of refrigeration equipment needed to maintain a room at a specified temperature. The initial goal of the project was to model the temperature changes of the walk-in refrigerator from the human and mechanical load as well as the environmental load, and determine the amount of refrigeration to maintain the set point temperature during one month of winter and one month of summer. The results from this transient model would be used to compare a modulating compressor system with a stagnant operating system. The current system in use for the walk-in refrigerator is steady system. The compressors operate at full load during all times of the year. The amount of energy used in this system could be compared to the amount of energy required from a modulating power compressor set only to maintain the set point in the walk-in refrigerator. In an effort to create this transient model, the mathematical model for the room was created. Since the research team was not able to pursue the transient model due to lack of accurate information on the Litehouse system, the model has been modified to perform calculations over a specified period of time to determine the total temperature change in the room in the absence of cooling, or sufficient cooling, the total heat input into the room over the specif,red period of time, and the maximum instantaneous duty on the room, for use in sizing refrigeration equipment. :t ? (oot<,{^ -il;.--{-. t. tlI -r This is accomplished by addressing each of the walls of the room: north, south, east, west, and roof, as a one dimensional thermal resistance circuit made up of outside convective and radiative heat transfer, conduction heat transfer through the building, and inside convective heat transfer. The total heat transferred through the walls is calculated and summed up between the 5 different surfaces. Additionally, the model takes into account the heat transfer into potential materials stored within the rectangular room, salad dressing in the case of Litehouse. Several assumptions and building specifications are required to construct the model. Most of the building specifications required have to do with materials, insulation, and thickness. The inputs to the model include specific material and size specifications including building materials and potential materials stored within the building. The environmental load is considered by inputting different outside temperature conditions including: air temperature, dew point temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, wind speed, wind direction, and solar flux. The inputs are tied in based on the time that they were measured. Sample information can be obtained using weather underground for a specific measure location. The solar flux can be obtained from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Solar Position and Intensity Calculator. The horizontal solar irradiance can be determined by using the latitude, longitude, time zone, and time interval. Additionally, the average humans present in the room per hour can be applied as an input as well as the total potential heat from any machinery in the room. As an example the average humans present can be determined by summing each human present multiplied by the time present in minutes and then dividing by sixty. If there are 6 people in the room for 20 minutes each than there is an average of 2 people per hour in the room. This is used to determine the heat load per person which is assumed to be 0(reference). The heat released by machinery is estimated based on the size of motor and efficiency of the motor. Multiplying the motor size by I minus the efficiency will estimate the average heat released by the motor. These two factors are included with the environmental factors in order to determine the total heat load on the room over time. Each wall can be specified as either an outside wall, inside wall, or neither. An outside wall will experience the influences of the environment outside. An inside wall shares a wall with another room within the facility with a different temperature set point. Neither represents a wall that is shared with another room at the same set point temperature. These specifications are used to determine the outside convection heat transfer. In the case of an outside wall, the solar flux is used in conjunction with the outside convection to determine the outer surface temperature of the building. Since this temperature is used for each calculation and is first order with respect to convection and fourth order with respect to radiation, an explicit solution of the quartic equation is used to determine the converged surface temperature. As a validation for the model, two periods of time are used from the walk-in refrigerator. Both periods of time are considered to be times of no activity. The refrigeration equipment to the room was shut off for maintenance on June 3,2017 and June 4, 2017 . The set point of the room was brought to 35"F instead of 38oF. On June 3 the maintenance took place from 6:00 AM until 2:00 PM and the final room temperature was read as 4loF. On June 4 the maintenance took place form 6:00 AM until l2:00 PM and the final room temperature was read as 38'F. The environmental conditions are known from the use of weather underground, and the human and machine load on the room is zero. Using the known size of the room and the approximate amount of salad dressing stored at that time, the insulation can be solved iteratively to match the temperature difference on both days and serve as validation for the relative accuracy of the model. The figures below show the input sections for the model. These are included at the beginning and are meant to be the user interface for simplicity. There are divided between a static input section and a transient input section. The current set up of the code provides the outputs in the terminal to the bottom left of the software interface as shown in Figure 7. #%% Inputs (constants) # Room Surroudings (does the wall border the outside or inside of the building) rooF'outside'; #'outside' will be airtemperature north:'inside'; #'inside' means inside room at differnt temperature south:'outside'; #'no'means inside room at same temperature east:'inside'; west:'outside'; T:6; #Number of hours under consideration in whole number g:9.80468312; #Acceleration due to gravity at elevation of room thuman:350000/3600; #Joules/hour released by the human body Qmachine:O; #Sum of total motors and equipment multiplied by (1-efficiecy) in hp #Radiation heat transfer material properties alpharooFO.26; #Radiative absorbance of outside roof material epsilonrooF0.9; #Radiative emmittance of outside roof material alphanorth:0.26; #Radiative absorbance of outside north wall material epsilonnorth:O.9; #Radiative emmittance of outside north wall material alphasouth:0.9; #Radiative absorbance of outside south wall material epsilonsouth:0.26; #Radiative emmittance of outside south wall material alphaeast:0.9; #Radiative absorbance of outside east wall material epsiloneast:0.26; #Radiative emmittance of outside east wall material alphawesFO.9; #Radiative absorbance of outside west wall material epsilonwest:O.26; #Radiative emmittance of outside west wall material #[nsulation Insulation:'Rvalue';#Options are 'Rvalue' or 'Conductivity' #Conduction heat transfer properties (thickness/thermal conductivity for 'conductivity') krooF0.02; #Thermal conductivity of roof insulation material (Wm*K) lroof=1; #Thickness of roof insulation (in) knorth:0.O2; #Thermal conductivity of narth wall insulation materiallnorth:l; #Thickness of north wall insulation ksouth:O.02; #Thermal conductivity of south wall insulation material lsouth:l; #Thickness of south wall insulation keast:0.02; #Thermal conductivity of east wall insulation material least:l; #Thickness of east wall insulation kwest:0.02; #Thermal conductivity of west wall insulation material lwest:1;#Thickness of west wall insulation #Conduction heat transfer properties (for 'Rvalue') RrooF8.0; #Rvalue per inch trooF6.0; #Thickness in inches Rnorth:8.0; tnorth:6.0; Rsouth:S.0; tsouth:6.0; Reast:8.0; teast:6.0; Rwest:8.0; twest:6.0; # Room Dimension L:l05; #Length of room north and south walls in ft W:I25; #Length of room east and west walls in ft H:30; #Height of room in ft Percentair:60; #Approximate volume percentage of air in the room (includes humidity in air) Percentmateriall:40; #Percentage of volume occupied by lst material Percentmaterial2:O; #Percentage of volume occupied by 2nd material Percentmaterial3:O; #Percentage of volume occupied by 3rd material Percentmaterial4:O; #Percentage of volume occupied by 4th material rho_1:8.29; rho_2:0; rho_3:0; rho_4:0; #Density in oz per US cup cp-l:3 #kJ/kg*K k_l k2' I ,4 #Material I container thermal conductivity (W/m*K)):0; k_3:0; k_4:0; l_1:0.05; #Material 1 container thickness in m U:o; l_3:0; I 4:0; #%% Inputs(transients) # Ambient Conditions Tair:numpy.array([55.4,59,57.2,5].2,59,59,59,59,60.8, 60.8, 60.8, 60.8, 60.8, 60.8, 60.8, 62.6,60.8,60.8, 60.81); #Outside Air Temperature in Fahrenheit Pressure:numpy.array(129 .93, 29 .93, 29 .94, 29 .93 , 29 .93, 29 .94, 29 .94, 29 .93, 29 .94, 29 .94, 29.94,29.94,29.96,29.96,29.95,29.96,29.96,29.96,29.961); #Pressur in inHG Tdew:numpy.array([53.6,51.8,53.6, 53.6,55.4,55.4,55.4,53.6,53.6,51.8,53.6, 53.6,53.6, 55.4, 55.4, 55.4, 53.6,53.6, 53.61); #Dewpoint Temperature in Fahrenheit RH:numpy.anay(1.94, .77, .88,.88, .88, .88, .88, .82, .77 , .72, .77, .77, .77 , .82, .82, .77 , .77, .77 ,.77)); #Relative Humidity WindSpeed=rumpy.array([3.5,4.6,3.5,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,5.8,4.6,0.0,3.5,6.9,6.9, 9.2,9.2,8.11); #Wind Speed in mph WindDirection:numpy.array(['sw', 'se', 'south', 'calm', 'calm', 'calm', 'calm', 'calm', 'calm', 'calm', 'north', 'ne','calm', 'south','se', 'south', 'south', 'sw', 'south']); #Direction of wind origin # Options for wind direction are 'north', 'south', 'east', 'west', 'ne', 'nw', 'se', 'sw', or'calm' Tw:numpy.anay(16,6.25,6.58333,6.91667,7.25,7.58333,7.91667,8.25,8.58333,8.91667, 9.25,9.58333,9.91667,10.25,10.58333, 10.91667,11.25,11.58333, 11.94667D; #Time of day in whole hours after midnight for weather data Humans:numpy.aray([0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]); #Average humans present per hour (sum of individuals * fraction of hour present) Th:numpy.array([6, 7 ,8,9, 10, I l]); #Time in whole hours after midnight for average humans present # Solar Fluxes into the room from varying directions (all are in W/m^2) #Data can be found using NREL website: #https ://www.nrel. gov/midc/solpos/solpos.html Solar:numpy.anay(1223.1022,328.2921, 434.6714, 540.2419,643.144,741.5801,833.8438, 918.3596, 993.6703, 1058.481, 1 1 I 1.689, 1 1 52.381); #Solar Flux onto roof #SolarNorth:0; #Solar Flux onto north wall #SolarSouth:0; #Solar Flux onto south wall #SolarEast:0; #Solar Flux onto east wall #SolarWest:0; #Solar Flux onto west wall Ts:numpy.array(16,6.5,7,7.5,8,8.5,9,9.5,10,10.5,11,11.5]) #Time in whole hours after midnight for solar fluxes # Room Conditions Troom:numpy.zeros(T* 3 600+ I );Troom[0]:35; #Initial Room Temperature in Fahrenheit RHRoom:RH; #Relative Humidity of room (if different from outside) PressureRoom:Pressure; #Pressure of room (if different from outside) RoomSetpoint:Troom[0]; #Setpoint Temperature for room (if not the same as initial temperature) Tinside:76; #Neighboringinsiderooms'temperatureinFahrenheit Pressureinside:Pressure; #Pressure ofinside room (ifdifferent from outside) RHinside:RH; #Relative humidity of inside room (if different from outside) T1:numpy.zeros(T*3600+1); #Material 1 temperatures Tl f0l:Troom[0]; #Material 1 initial temperature is same as room In [1]: runflle('C:/Users/Stephen/Desktop/Folders/Lltehouse/Room Calculatlon Sunday, lune 4. py' , wdir='C: /UserslStephen/Desktop/Folders/Litehouse' )Flna1 Temperature ln degrees F 38.3563720318 Total heat lnput to room ln btuh 7L793057.0771 Maximum Duty in btuh L4824.639fi741 fr Figure 7 Sample Python console output including groph of room temperature As part of the insulation input, only the main insulation material is required. This is because the insulation creates the largest temperature difference in conduction to the point that the other materials in the wall can be ignored. The information can be input either as material thermal conductivity and thickness or as "Rvalue" and thickness as determined based on manufacturer specifications. The materials stored inside of the room can be specified and included as part of the heat loss to the room based on the approximated percentage of the room occupied by the materials, and their approximate densities and heat capacities. For the modeling of the Litehouse walk-in refrigerator estimated densities and heat capacities were assumed for all of the salad dressing stored in the refrigerator. Additionally, conduction can be considered within the stored materials. For the case of Litehouse, the conduction material was assumed to be glass bottles with an estimated thickness to determine the heat input into the product materials. The results from the python model comparison of the two days will be included here to help show the estimated accuracy of the model. Discussion?: The models that were developed as part of the study have been validated by comparing certain parameters determined by the model to the measured data point. In the case of models 1 and 2 in HYSYS, the calculated condenser outlet temperature for air or water was compared to the measured temperature point. This evaluation shows the accuracy of HYSYS which is then used to validate models 3 and 4 based on the results of I and 2 since there is no measured data to accompany these models. The python model was shown to be accurate from the observed temperature change over the time periods on two different days. The purpose in providing the mathematical model in addition to the process model is to provide the basis of the process models. The estimated load requirement on the room calculated by the Python model can be used as an input into the process model to help determined the size and number of evaporators required as well as the size of the compressor and condenser on the refrigeration cycle. These models can be used in conjunction for the preliminary design of a new refrigeration of air conditioning system. Even though these models have shown accuracy, it is still recommended that they be used as preliminary design tools to begin the design process for a new refrigeration or air conditioning system. Several assumptions and approximations were used to develop and implement the models to make them easier to use. The results obtained from the models will save designers significant amounts of time in narrowing the requirements for the system. At that time, in depth design can take place that will account for all equipment required in the system and the accompanying flow rates, temperatures, and pressure drops of the refrigeration system. Future Work: Future work on this project includes work done by Litehouse foods, potential work for University of Idaho, and the work for Avista Utilities. As part of the project deliverables, Avista has been given detailed instructions on how the models were created including all inputs and design aspects. This will allow the engineers at Avista to recreate the models and provide their other customers with the estimates from the models in order to move towards greater energy efficiency. Litehouse is willing to improve efficiency practices and are open to recommendation made by both the University of Idaho and Avista utilities. Before any recommendations were made they began construction on a new walk-in refrigerator which will be refrigerated by 4 parallel systems that provide power modulation and redundancy. This new design is a large step towards better energy efficiency at the Sandpoint facility. By using 4 parallel modulating systems, the compressors will run only when needed and this will avoid the constant full load of the large compressors during all times of the year. Additionally, the University of ldaho commits to presenting Litehouse with estimated savings from increased energy efficiency of systems present at Litehouse. Avista commits to assist with the capital costs of new equipment with the condition that energy savings be large enough to be profitable on both ends. These recommendations will be presented directly to management at Litehouse. The initial purpose of the project was to compare the loads of the refrigeration equipment at Litehouse. A static system and a modulating system can be compared using the process modeling software and the estimated energy savings from a modulating system are an output of that model. The University of Idaho has shown its capabilities to perform this type of comparison and evaluation when given sufficient, accurate information and express its willingness to participate in any further energy efficiency study through Avista Utilities which might be within the scope of the Universities capabilities. Aiyrlsra APPENDIX H Final Report: IDL Energy Management Phase 2 I NTEG RATI D DESIGN LAB Universityof ldaho Rrouceo Onorn Wxou Burlorrrc ErurRcv SrrvrumrroN FoR VrRruRl Conn u rsstoNrNG PRorecr RepoRr PRrpRRro ron Avlsra Ulltttrs August 37,20L7 Prepored for: Avista Utilities Authors: Sean Rosin Damon Woods Elizabeth Cooper Jinchao Yuan AlEwsrA Report Number: 1608_01 Prepored by: University of ldaho lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 306 S 6th St. Boise, lD 83702 USA www.uidaho.edu/idl IDL Director: Elizabeth Cooper Authors: Sean Rosin Damon Woods Elizabeth Cooper Jinchao Yuan Prepared for: Avista Utilities Please cite this report os follows: Rosin S., Wood, D., Cooper, E., and Yuan, J. (2017). Using reduced-order models for simulotion bosed commissioning of buildings. {1"608_01). University of ldaho lntegrated Design Lab, Boise, lD. Contract Number: R-39872 DISCLAIMER While the recommendations in this report have been reviewed for technical accuracy and are believed to be reasonably accurate, the findings are estimates and actual results may vary. All energy savings and cost estimates included in the report are for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as design documents or as guarantees of energy or cost savings. The user of this report, or any information contained in this report, should independently evaluate any information, advice, or direction provided in this report. THE UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, EXTENDS NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR FINDINGS, CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT. THE UNIVERSITY ADDITIONALLY DISCLAIMS ALL OBLIGATIONS AND LIABILITIES ON THE PART OF UNIVERSITY FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL AND CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, ATTORNEYS' AND EXPERTS' FEES AND COURT COSTS (EVEN IF THE UNIVERSITY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, FEES OR cosTs), ARtstNG ouT oF oR lN coNNEcTloN wlTH THE MANUFACTURE, USE OR SALE OF THE INFORMATION, RESULT(S), PRoDUCT(S), SERVICE(S) AND PROCESSES PROVTDED BY THE UNIVERSITY. THE USER ASSUMES ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE USE, SALE, OR oTHER DTSPOS|T|ON BY THE USER OF PRODUCT(S), SERVICE(S), OR (pRocESSES) TNCORPORATTNG OR MADE BY USE OF THrS REPORT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DAMAGES OF ANY KIND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT OR THE INSTALLATION OF RECOMMENDED MEASURES CONTAINED HEREIN. Taslr or Corurerurs 2. Executive Summary 3. Research Motivation L. Acknowledgements. 4. Project Background 4.1 Whole Building Energy Simulation 4.2 Reduced Order Thermal Models (Grey Box Models).............. 4.3 Prior Research Using Reduced Order Models to Describe the Buildings........ 4.4 Simplified HVAC Model 4.4.L Economizer Controls Model 4.4.2 AHU Preheat Coil and Cooling Coil Model 4.4.3 Terminal Reheat Model 4.4.4 Supply Air Flow Rate.... 5. Results 6. Discussion and Future Work 7. Budget Summary.... 8. References ............. 3 4 5 7 8 9 Dynamic Behavior of ','.',.20 .,',..,22 .,.,...23 26 72 27 ................ 35 ................ 37 ................ 38 lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 2 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) AHU BACnet BCVTB COBE EMS HVAC IDL ROM SASP TOT UI VAV VFD Air Handling Unit Building Automation Controls Networking Protocol Building Controls VirtualTest Bed College of Business and Economics Energy Management Control System Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning lntegrated Design Lab Reduced Order Model Supply Air Set Point Termina I Outlet Temperature University of ldaho Variable Air Volume Variable Frequency Drive AcnoruYrus AND ABBREVIATIoNS lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 3 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) This research was made possible through funding support from Avista Utilities via ldaho PUC Case Number AVU-E-13-08. The research team expresses gratitude to Avista staff and project managers for their support of this project. This project could not have happened without the coordination and help received from the University of ldaho's facilities team for the access they provided. Particular thanks is due to Keven Hattenburg who went out of his way to help with our research. 1. AcxrrrowrEDGEMENTs lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 4 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) The University of ldaho - lntegrated Design Lab (Ul-lDL) modeled an existing building using reduced order modeling techniques as a tool for virtual commissioning. The research focused on the Albertson's College of Business and Economics building at the University of ldaho Moscow Campus. The reduced order model was composed of sets of differential equations with system parameters which describe the dynamic nature of heat transfer though a building. These parameters were determined through software optimization in order for the model to best predict the zone temperature of the building when compared to the zone temperature as predicted by EnergyPlus. The reduced order model was coupled with an HVAC model to predict the total annual energy consumption of the building which was then used to determined potential energy savings measures. It was found that the COBE building lacked thermostat setbacks during periods of unoccupancy, and the ROM model was used to predict the energy savings associated with updating the controller. lt was found that approximately 104,000 kWh of potential energy savings could be realized if the thermostat had properly programed temperature setbacks during times the building is unoccupied. 2. ExecuruE SUMMARY lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 5 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) While new buildings increasingly rely on automated controls for their Energy Management Systems (EMS), commissioning of these controls in new buildings and verification of existing sequences in existing buildings are a time intensive process. They could run the risk of suboptimal occupant comfort, and expose the building owners to unnecessary liability and higher energy costs during the time period before commissioning is accomplished. The building commissioning process encompasses a wide range of stages, starting with design development and ending at least one year after the building is occupied [1]. New building control commissioning typically takes one full year of building operation, so that all weather conditions and all modes of operation are experienced, and often takes two full years before the system is operating nearest to its potential. ln addition, it is often difficult to set up, or is time consuming to wait for, specific space or outdoor conditions to occur for all aspects of an EMS control logic to be tested and addressed, leaving large gaps in the verification process for some modes of operation. Older buildings can also suffer from poor controls that are out of tune with the current building occupancy patterns or not up to date with current best practices control techniques. ln current practice, suboptimum and incorrect control programming can take months or years to detect, if they are ever detected [2]. When controls issues arise, they can also be difficult to reproduce and take weeks or months to rectify [3]. Operational issues can often go undetected, especially if they do not directly affect human comfort. Simulation-based commissioning holds promise as a way to reduce or avoid these hazards. The previous research the lntegrated Design Lab (lDL), Boise, conducted energy simulations as a tool to virtually commission buildings. This research focused on using an EnergyPlus model and connecting it to a duplicate of the Alerton Building controller that is used at the University of ldaho Albertson's College of Business and Economics (COBE) building in Moscow, ldaho. This was accomplished by enabling communications from the EnergyPlus simulation to the building controller, which was done 3. ResrancH MonvATtoN lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 5 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) using the Building Controls Virtual Test Bed (BCTVB). BCWB is "middle-ware" which translates the outputs from the EnergyPlus simulation to either a voltage or digital input that the building controller can understand [4]. The variables that were chosen for the study included outdoor air temperature, outdoor air damper position, mixed air temperature, and return air temperature. The Alterton controller requires inputs from other equipment and feedbacks from each of the thermal zones, which was not practical to model in EnergyPlus due to computational limitations. These inputs were bypassed by adjusting the logic to allow the controller to continue to function without each individual feedback loop. This method of simulation-based commissioning is less time intensive than traditional commissioning approaches, but developing an accurate energy model takes time and knowledge that most practitioners do not possess. Although the cost of commissioning a building is prohibitive for many owners, the research demonstrated that virtually commissioning a building is a viable alternative. The current phase of the research explored ways to reduce the time and monetary expenditures of virtual commissioning still further. The current research aims to simplify the modeling process to allow practitioners a means of virtually commissioning a building without the steep learning curve associated with modeling in EnergyPlus. This approach reduces the modeling time, allows for innovative control strategies to be investigated quickly, and can be used by practitioners to quickly diagnose an operational or control issues. There are still limitations with reduced order energy modeling that need to be addressed before the methods of virtual commissioning can be fully utilized. 4. PnorecrBncrcRouruo lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 7 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) The team selected the COBE building, on the University of ldaho campus in Moscow, lD for study. The 50,000-square-foot facility was constructed in 200L and is a mix of classroom spaces and faculty offices. lt also has a unique simulation room with over twenty computer stations and a terminal for real-time market analysis and trading, requiring a high electric load. The building is equipped with a Variable Air Volume (VAV) system and relies on district heating and cooling from campus water lines that serve two air-handling units (AHUs) in the building. The smaller of these two AHUs conditions the basement, while the larger AHU provides air to the upper three floors. Non-fan powered VAV boxes are located in each zone. Some of the building's geometry can be seen in Figure 1. Figure 1. COBE Building photo (left) model geometry (right) The COBE Building was chosen for the previous research because the building's controllers communicate through a standard building automation and control network protocol: BACnet. This communication protocol was essential for the research so that the energy model could interact with the controllers in a standard way. The team continued using this building for the reduced order model (ROM) virtual commissioning reseach to so that the new method could be compared against the calibrated baseline EnergyPlus modelfrom the previous research. Reduced Order Modeling Background b--L.*I --T1- r T:: lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 8 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) 4.1 Whole Building Energy Simulation There are several different types of modeling approaches used in whole building simulation. Black box modeling is a data driven modeling approach which uses actual building time series data to statistically fit a model to determine building parameters. Black box modeling does not provide insightful information about the mechanism or the behavior of the building [5]. Rather, it is solely a statistical representation of a building's data correlations. Black box models only focus on finding relationships between the model's inputs and outputs [6], which is not very useful for virtual commissioning Another practice of whole building energy simulation is through white box modeling, or models that are developed through physics and first principles [6]. One of the best known white box modeling techniques for whole building energy simulation is EnergyPlus. EnergyPlus was developed by the Department of Energy for engineers and architects to model energy and water usage of buildings. This method is an exhaustive process which can take several months to build accurately. All the building's geometry, construction, zone characteristics, heating ventilation and air-condition (HVAC) controls and Iayouts must be defined properly for EnergyPlus to accurately predict the energy consumption of the building. When the building ages, there is no way to account for the degradation of equipment and insulation in the modeling process. Therefore, after the building has been virtually constructed, the model must undergo calibration using actual building energy data. Due to this lengthy process, whole building energy modeling with EnergyPlus is often neglected, and as a result many energy savings opportunities go u ndetected. A third modeling technique that has been underutilized is grey box modeling. Grey box modeling is still built on the foundation of first principles, but it uses real run-time data to optimize model parameters [6]. For thermal systems, grey box modeling uses a set of differential equations to model the dynamic nature of heat transfer throughout the structure. There is no limit to the order of the system, lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 9 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) but as the complexity of the model increases so does the computational expense. Each model order is an additional differential equation, and each additional order equates to an additional set of model dynamics that must be accounted for. The time constant of a building is related to time of thermal energy decay and it is composed of thermal resistance and thermal capacitance of the building. These parameters are then optimized using actual data from the physicalstructure to obtain the best fit of the model. This modeling technique is less computationally expensive than white box modeling, and takes much less time to develop a predictive model for the thermal performance of buildings 4.2 Reduced Order Thermal Models (Grey Box Models) There are two parameters that are used to describe the dynamics of thermal systems using ROMs: the thermal capacitance and thermal resistance. The thermal capacitance of a substance is a function of known material properties and is defined in Equation 1 as: 6 = pCrV (1) Where p is the density of the material [kg/m'], Co is the specific heat U/kgK] , and V is the volume [m']. When a building has a large cumulative thermal capacitance, otherwise known as massive building construction, the rate at which the building's temperature can change due to environmental and internal effects is low. The thermal capacitance is an important parameter to estimate the transient behavior of a building [7], but is oftentimes hard to calculate even when the material properties of a building are known. Another parameter used to describe thermal systems is the thermal resistance of a material. The thermal resistance describes the material's natural tendency to resist the flow of heat. There are several different forms of thermal resistance, but they all have the units of [WK] and all describe resistance to heat transfer. The thermal capacitance and the thermal resistance are the basis of ROMs. lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 10 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) Reduced order thermal models are commonly referred to as a lumped RC model and are represented using thermal circuits which are similar to electrical circuits, an example is shown below in Figure 2. r*R1 T1 R:Qroaas Figure 2. 2nd Order Lumped RC Thermal Network To model a building using reduced order techniques there are several assumptions that have to be made: 1.. The zone air is well mixed and at a consistent temperature Heat transfer is one directional There is no temperature gradient in the wall making the heat flux a constant value for the entire surface 4. There is a homogenous temperature throughout each 'lump' Theoretically, a material can be broken into an infinite number of lumps. However, each lump increases the order of the system which Increases the computational complexity and slows down the runtime of the simulation. Reduced order modeling is one of the most powerful methods of modeling dynamic systems due to the simplicity when compared to other approaches. For these types of models there exists a minimum number of variables, i.e. states, that when known can completely describe the system [8]. These states are well known and measurable, and for thermal systems they are the temperatures of nodes distributed throughout the system. These state variables can be described using a vector and the Ic1Ic1 2. 3. linearized state space representation of the thermalcircuit illustrated above is shown in Equation 3 lntegrated Design Lab I Boise ll Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608-01) f=AT+BA (3) Where 7 is a vector of all nodal temperatures, and D is a vector of all system inputs. A and B are coefficient matrices containing the thermal parameters that describe the relationship between the inputs and the desired outputs. Equation 3 can be expanded and expressed in matrix form to represent the thermal circuit shown above in Figure 2. E] I rl 1r-aE * *,) t T RzCr L CzRz CzRz].1 T* & 0 (4) Load.s Where: Vorioble Table 1.2R2G Variable Definitions Description Units T- T7 T2 R1 R2 CL c2 Qmoa, The outside ambient temperature The walltemperature The zone temperature The effective thermal resistance of the wall The effective thermal resistance between the wall and the zone The effective thermal capacitance of the wall The effective thermal capacitance of the zone The heat load of the system (solar, internal, infiltration, HVAC) ['c] ['c] ['c] lw/'cI lw/'cI lJl"cl U/'C] twI The inputs for this system are the ambient temperature and all heat gains (i.e. plug loads, solar gains, and fenestration gains), which are all applied at zonal node. A simplified diagram illustrating the locations of the Rs and Cs is shown below in Figure 3. lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 12 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) Qg.ins Wall Construction T- cr T cr Figure 3. 2R2C Thermal Parameter Diagram Cz is the thermalcapacitance of the zone, which includes the air and allthe interior mass, i.e. furniture, carpet, etc. Cr is the effective thermal capacitance of the building constructions. The location of Cr is arbitrary and the only known information about its location is that it falls somewhere in between the building's wall construction. The wall is not partitioned in any symmetrical manner; it is divided such that the temperature at each node is uniform throughout the entire lump of material. Rr is the effective thermal resistance in between the ambient temperature and T1, dnd Rz is the effective thermal resistance in between Tr and the center of the zone. This model structure was utilized in a simplified case study to investigate the effects of the thermal parameters before modeling the COBE Building. The model of the COBE building is more intricate than the 2R2C model shown above due to the complexity of the building's dynamics. 4.3 Prior Research Using Reduced Order Models to Describe the Dynamic Behavior of Buildings The simplest way to represent the construction of a building is by a l-R1C model, which only has a single thermal resistance and a single thermal capacitance. This representation of a building is unrealistic because it lumps the mass of the wall and the mass of the interior together [9]. This forces the temperatures of these two masses to be equal at all times by not identifying them as two separate Rr R1 thermal capacitances. Additionally, most of the thermal capacitance of a building is contained in the wall lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 13 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) of the structure, and there is a thermal barrier between the wall construction and the interior zone, which this model ignores. lt has been concluded that if you add an additional resistance between the zone temperature and the external temperature it greatly reduces the peak instantaneous loads during warmups [9] which helps the model's overall fidelity. Bacher et al. [10] investigated which models offer the best performance for the least complexity to fully describe the dynamic of the building. The process starts with determining the simplest model that describes all the information embedded in the data, being the l-R1C thermal network. The model's order was increased to see how the higher order model statistically compares the previous model. This was done using a likelihood tests which compares the predicted results with the previous model to determine the likelihood there exists a higher order model that statistically predicts the zone temperature more accurately. This method was applied to an experiment facility in Denmark where all the construction materials were known. lt was determined that a 3R3C model describes the building's dynamics adequately enough and a higher order model is not worth the extra computational expense. The three thermal capacitances were associated with the heater, the interior space, and the construction of the building. Based on the findings of Bacher et al. [10], the model structure that was chosen to describe the dynamics of the building was a 3R3C model, which was coupled with a 2RLC model to describe the dynamics of the ground and foundation. A diagram showing the model's thermal circuit superimposed on a simple bullding diagram illustrating the relative location of the model parameters can be seen in Figure 4. Where lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 14 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) R* T- Rs Ts Figure 4. Diagram of Thermal Network used in Modeling COBE Building Variable Description Units R1 T* Ts R1 R2 R3 Rf ['c] ["c] ["c] ["c] ["c] The outside ambient temperature The temperature of the ground The effective thermal resistance of the wall The effective thermal resistance of the wall The effective thermal resistance between the interior of the wall and the zone The effective thermal resistance of the windows The effective thermal resistance between the center of the foundation and the central interior zone The effective thermal resistance of the ground and Rw Rs [W"C] IW"C] lJ/'cl R1 lc{ lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 15 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) C C 1 2 the midsection of the building's foundation The effective thermal capacitance of the wall The effective thermal capacitance of the zone The effective thermal capacitance of the foundation The heating and cooling loads of the system (solar, internal, infiltration, HVAC) u/"cl u/'cl U/'C] twl cf Qmads This thermal circuit can be expressed using a set of linear differential equations to describe the states of the structure. The selected states used to fully describe the system are the temperature of the foundation (Tr), the internal zone temperature (T.), and the wall temperatures in between the interior and the fagade (Tr), and (Tz). lt should be noted that states are the effective temperatures of the modeled capacitances and they represent the overall average temperature for each lump. An expanded matrix showing the full set of Equations can be seen below. 7R, * R21_t-t\nrRrcr l 1 RzCt zR" * R"r_ I __:_______:l\RrRrcr) 1 1 RzCz R3R/+RpR/*RryR3 R3Ru.,R1C, 1. Rrcr Rrc, /Rf + Rs\- \rt\,rt ) T* R1 0 (fi* o^*'1 Ts Rs 0 0 IA RrCz 0 lil.(s) I 0 I 0 RzC, 0 The loads included in the model were the internal loads, and the solar gains which were outputted from EnergyPlus and used as an input into the ROM. These values can be determined computationally using ASHRAE standards in the EnergyPlus mode. ln this study, equivalent values used in EnergyPlus was again used to avoid any additional errors. All of these loads were applied at the center of the zone which is an oversimplification of the system. lt is known that the solar loads will be distributed throughout the interior of the structure, and the distribution pattern is determined by the geometry, reflectance, and many other parameters of the building. As well, the conditioned air will be distributed throughout the entire space and not just supplied to the center of the zone, without lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 16 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) knowing the exact distribution pattern, the loads have to be applied at the center. Additionally, the solar gains do not only come from the radiation directly admitted into the space via the window, the also come from the thermal storage properties of the exterior wall construction. As the day progresses the building materials store energy and their internal temperature increases, thus causing conductive heat transfer to increase throughout the entire surface of the exterior wall. These gains are happening simultaneously over the entire exterior wall, not just at the center of the zone. The model parameters were estimated using a Simulink' Optimization package that iterates through different parameter values until the model best predicts values when compared to a user inputted time series, the estimated parameter values are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Optimized Model Parameter Values Thermal Resistance ThermalCopacitance Rt Rz Ra R* Ry Rq 6.617 E2 1.272 E-1, 3.027E-4 3.768 E-4 2.909 E-5 2.968 E-4 7.029 E8 2.s83 E72 4.520 E7 1.296 E9 Ct Cz C, C1 The model parameters shown in Table 2 best predicted the ROM's zone temperature when compared to the results of EnergyPlus. The zone temperatures from EnergyPlus have been plotted against those from the ROM in Figure 5. The left-top and left-bottom figures show the hourly zone temperature for the first week of February and the first week of August respectively lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 17 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1508_01) Zona Tamparrturo Comp.rlson Aver.ga Dally Tempo6turG Rosldualr 21 i20 : 19 g 18 Ee 17 16 15 60 60 t@ Ims (hr.l 120 140 160 1ao 40 E3goo 20 26 c E 20 16 -t.5-2-2.5 1.550-1 -0.5 0 0.5 T6mpemture Residual [CJrm€ thrl Figure 5. (Left - Top) EnergyPlus vs Simulink Zone Temperature for first week of February. (Left - Bottom) EnergyPlus vs Simulink Zone Temperature for first week of August. (Right) Daily Average Temperature Residual Distribution During February the EnergyPlus zone temperature settles to the set point whereas the lumped RC model does not accurately predict this behavior. This is believed to be from the nature of ROMs, which are typically utilized to model dynamic systems. The ROM has better fidelity when there are instabilities in the zone temperature and it does not settle to a set point, which is illustrated in the August zone temperature figure. The daily average temperature difference between EnergyPlus and the ROM have been plotted in a histogram which shows the frequency and the magnitude of the temperature. Figure 5 (Right) shows a right skewed histogram centered around an average of 0.039'C. This is an indication that the ROM over-predicts the zone temperature by an average of 0.039oC. This should translate into a higher magnitude of cooling needed to compensate for the over-prediction of the zone temperature when compared to EnergyPlus. While the reduced order thermal model predicts the indoor zone temperature, indoor zone temperature is not a direct indication of energy consumption. ln order to "convert" these temperature predications to energy, an HVAC model and controller are needed. To use this model as a tool of virtual commissioning, the HVAC model needs to describe the mechanical systems as accurately and simply as possible, a diagram illustrating the flow of the fully integrated model can be seen below in Figure 5. 60 50 120 140 160 1a0 Qrvrc lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 18 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissloning of buildings (Report 1608_01) Tzon. Figure 6. lntegrated Reduced Order Thermal Model Flow Diagram The thermal model will predict the zone temperature of the buildings, which will be passed through to a controller to inform the simplified HVAC model how to condition the space. The HVAC model will predict the magnitude and duration of zone conditioning which will be relayed back to the thermal model and applied at the center of the zone like the other zone loads, which completes the feedback loop 4.4 Simplified HVAC Model As discussed earlier, the COBE Building is a mixed use educational facility. lt has over fifty zones that have varying occupancy, internal loads and thermostat set points. The HVAC equipment that the COBE building uses is a district heating/cooling variable VAV system with non-fan powered terminal reheat. There is a district chiller and boiler that provide each building with chilled water and hot water, which is utilized as the working fluid in the main AHUs. The COBE building has two AHUs, one that services only the basement, and the other that services the three above ground floors. For simplicity, the HVAC model was altered to only have one AHU to service the entire building. Figure 7 shows a diagram of a typical air handler unit. r- AFh fhrmrl Mod.l + + lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 19 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) netsm f.n Erhrurt Supply frn ?nhot C.cll Coollrr3 Coll Ourdoo. Fllt.t Figure 7. AHU Diagram [11] There are four main parts of a typical HVAC system used at the COBE building: the supply and return air fans, air dampers, heating and cooling coils, and the terminal reheat box (not illustrated above). The supply air fan provides the necessary air flow to meet the minimum outdoor air standard and to condition the zone to the required thermostat set point. The supply air fan is connected to a variable frequency drive (VFD) which controls the speed of the fan, which is the most efficient way of controlling the air flow. The next elements of the HVAC system are the AHU dampers, which are used to vary the amount of outside air and return air vented into the mixing chamber. The dampers optimize their position to meet the mixed air temperature set point, which is done through modulating the flow of the two streams entering the mixing chamber. After the air passes through the mixing chamber it is conditioned to the supply air temperature set point, which oftentimes is the same as the mixed air set point. The heating and cooling coils in the AHU are only used when the dampers cannot meet the mixed air set point. The last components of these systems are the terminal units which are located at each individual zone and are used to reheat the air before it enters the space. These boxes have their own fr * lr'lay ldm ftfgft idutW.t- W.l( W.lo W.tn Alr & Rrcirculrtion Mh.d Ait * 3opply Alr+E hot water heating coils, which are also supplied from the district boiler. Each component of the VAV lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 20 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) district heating/cooling HVAC system needs to be modeled individually to have an accurate representation of the entire system. 4.4.1 Economizer Controls Model The HVAC system used in the COBE building relies on an economizer to capture free cooling during times when the ambient conditions permit. Economizers have four different operational modes: heating, modulating, integrating, and mechanical cooling mode [12]. When the outdoor temperature is less than 1oC (heating mode) the economizer only allows in the minimum required outdoor air for ventilation. The outdoor air is mixed in with the return air in the mixing chamber and is then heated to the necessary temperature to meet the heating demand. During mild outdoor temperatures (1oC to 13'C)the full cooling demand of the building can be met by modulatingthe fraction of outdoor airthat is mixed with the return air (i.e., modulated economizer mode). This operational mode allows the economizer to provide the most amount of free cooling to the building. The next operational mode is integrated economizer mode which occurs when the outdoor temperature is too high for to meet the full load by solely using outdoor air (13oC to 24"C), during this temperature band some mechanical cooling must take place to meet the cooling demand of the building. The last operational mode occurs when the outdoor air temperature is above the economizer's high limit shut off. During this mode the economizer only allows the minimum required outdoor air to meet ventilation requirements and the space conditioning is accomplished through mechanical cooling. Figure 8 illustrates of all economizer operational modes throughout the year. lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 2l Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) modulated economizer cooling integrated economizer mechanicalcooling cooling 100 heating mechanical Epacity mechanical cooling €pacity Etum airllowae 80 !_ oq360o .E o:40o Bot'@ 20 or6drod 0 highlimit shutoff Jmaximum heating load minimum cooling load maximum cooling load Figure 8. Typical Economizer Operation [12] The above operational modes are the basis for the economizer controls utilized in the HVAC model. They have been transformed into block diagram logic, which can be seen below in Figure 9. Hlgh Figure 9. Economizer Simulink Model The economizer model has several subsystems which all carry out essential functions that allow the model to accurately calculate the percent outside air. The percent outside air is a function of the air's physical properties, which have to be determined before the economizer positioned can be calculated outdoor airflow lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 22 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) 4.4.2 AHU Preheot Coil ond Cooling Coil Model Once the air has been mixed in the mixing chamber, it passes through the supply air fan and is blown over the AHU heating/cooling coils, where the air is conditioned to the supply air set point (SASP) temperature. When the AHU is operating in modulated economizer mode, the temperature differential between the mixed air set point and the supply air set point is minimal, reducing the energy required to condition the supply air. During the other modes of operation, the main AHU heating/cooling coils will have to condition the supply air to the correct set point. The driving force in moving air around the building is the pressure differential between the supply air and the zone air, which is supplied by the supply air fan. This process is non-adiabatic and the air stream collects a small amount of residual energy as it passes though the blower, which increases the overall temperature of the air stream. This rise in temperature can be determined through computational methods, but for simplicity and accuracy the temperature rise was outputted from the EnergyPlus model and included in the Simulink model. The AHU heating/cooling model compares the supply air set point temperature to the current mixed air temperature to determine the amount of heating or cooling that needs to be added. To avoid issues of simultaneous heating and cooling, a dead-band was modeled which represents the realistic characteristics of actual systems, and the dead band temperature range was set at +1oC. lf the differential between the mixed air and the supply air set point is more than one degrees Celsius, the conditioning is turned on until the temperature falls within the dead band of the controller. The amount of heating/cooling required is determined through Equation 6, which was developed using first principles of heat transfer. Qeruu = Procrvro(Tres, - Trun)(6) lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 23 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) tu Figure 10. AHU Coil Heating/Cooling Block Diagram The energy calculated in the AHU model is not a direct feedback loop for the thermal model but it does contribute to the overall energy consumption of the building. 4.4.3 Terminal Reheot Model Once the air stream has been conditioned to the supply air set point temperature, it is distributed throughout the building. The supply air set point for the COBE Building is 72.78"C, meaning during the winter and shoulder seasons the air is going to need reheat before entering the zone. This is accomplished through the terminal reheat boxes located at each zone. The terminal boxes at the COBE Building are known as single-duct VAV pressure-independent terminal boxes with reheat. The terminal reheat unit only has a hot coil which is supplied from the same central plant as the main AHU heating coil in. Along with the hot water coil there is a terminal box damper, and a flow sensor. As the zone temperature changes the controller modulates the damper position to vary the amount of air delivered r 005SS-tsE.e sMy lul Where psa is the density of the supply air [kg/m3], C, is the specific heat of air [J/kgK], 75a is the volumetric supply air flow [m'/s], Tsasp is the supply air set point temperature [oC], and Tr,aa is the mixed air temperature ["C]. The relay in Figure 10 corresponds to the dead band discussed above. When the absolute value of the difference between the mixed air temperature and the supply air set point is more than unity, the relay outputs a zero which forces the heating/cooling to go to zero. lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 24 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) into the zone. The flow sensor serves as a failsafe to insure the flow does not fall below the minimum requirements for ventilation. lf the heating load of the building is not being met by modulating the damper, the controller opens a valve allowing more water to flow through the coils which increases the temperature of the air supplied to the zone [13]. A typical terminal box control loop diagram can be seen below in Figure 1-1- HeatingDampercoil /r\\ Thermostat Figure 11. Typical Terminal Box Feedback Diagram [13] These dampers are an essential component to multi-zone VAV HVAC systems. Our model was simplified to a single zone building so the terminal damper feedback loop was not modeled directly, but its main function was captured and utilized elsewhere in the model. ln multi-zone system, the terminal box dampers modulate the flow supplied to the zone. When the dampers are at their minimum allowed flowrate, and all the zone are being adequately conditioned, the main air handler reduces the supply flow rate using the VFD. ln the simplified COBE model there is only a single zone, so when the zone is meeting the temperature set point there is a feedback loop, acting similarly to the VFD signal, to reduce the supply air flow rate. The modulation happens at the main air handler instead of the terminal box damper so there is no need for an additional damper in the reduced order system. lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 25 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) When modeling the terminal reheat there were two separate perspectives that had to be accounted for: the amount of energy supplied to the zone, and the amount of energy consumed by conditioning the air. The air entering the terminal reheat box is at the supply air set point temperature, which is below cooling thermostat set point, so even if the terminal reheat unit is not being utilized, it is still cooling the zone which is a feedback loop for the thermal model. Even though the terminal reheat unit is only capable of supplying heat to the air stream, all the energy contained in the air stream needs to be accounted for when coupling the HVAC model with the reduced order thermal model. The amount of energy being supplied to the zone from the terminal unit can be seen below in Equations 7 and 8. Qrermtnat Reheat zone Heat = {prorrCpVro(Tro - Tron"), tf Tro ) Tronr} Ol Qrerminat Reheat zone coot = {PsespCpilse(Tro - Trorr), tf Tro l Tron"} (8) Where psa is the density of the supply air [kg/m3], C, is the specific heat of air U/kgKl, 7ro is the volumetric supply air flow [m'/s], Tro is the terminal outlet temperature [oC], and T.onu is the zone temperature ["C]. The amount of energy supplied to the zone is proportional to the temperature differential between the terminal outlet temperature and the zone temperature. lt should be noted that the cooling energy supplied to the zone is negative which keeps the HVAC model compatible with the thermal model. When the terminal outlet temperature is less than the current zone temperature, the zone is currently being cooled, but due to the operational modes of the terminal reheat boxes, the air may still need be reheated even though the room is being cooled. During cooling mode, the terminal outlet temperature will be modulated between the range of the supply air set point (12.78'C) and approximately 18"C, and during heating mode, the terminal outlet temperature will be modulated from 18oC up to 33oC. lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 26 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_0L) 4.4.4 Supply Air Flow Rate The supply air flow rate is modeled the same way as the terminal outlet temperature; for both heating and cooling, the flow rate is controlled by applying a linear gain to the temperature differential between the zone temperature and the current set point, which can be seen in Equation 7. The supply air flow rate modulation is turned on and off through a 'VFD' signalthat originates in the terminal outlet temperature model. When the cooling or heating demand cannot be met by controlling the terminal outlet temperature, the VFD signal is turned on which allows the flow rate to be modulated, if the signal is ofl the flow rate vented into the space is set at the minimum required for ventilation. SA FIow = l(Tron" - Trtot). 1.1] + Mtn Flow Rate (9) The linear gain used in the controller was determined using an iterative process. The minimum and maximum flow rate of the system was determined by surveying at the EnergyPlus' flow rate. Once again, the actual COBE Building may achieve a higher or lower flow rate, but since the ROM's effectiveness is based off a comparison with EnergyPlus, the values predicted by the EnergyPlus are more critical. Once the flow rate of the system is accurately calculated, the amount of heat or cooling entering the space can be determined. The energy flow entering the space is a feedback for the thermal model and is applied at the center of the zone. The HVAC system was integrated with the thermal model and energy consumption could be compared between the reduced order and EnergyPlus model. 5. Resulrs lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 27 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) The ROM was compared to both the single zone and the fully zoned EnergyPlus model of the COBE building. The single zone EnergyPlus model was used to compare individual output parameters such as zone heating and cooling loads, supply air flow rate, etc., whereas the fully zoned EnergyPlus model was compared to the ROM for the virtual commission recommendations. This comparison method was chosen due to the simplifications that were made earlier in the modeling process. The ROM was optimized to thermally perform close to the single zone EnergyPlus model. The parameters were optimized to match the response of the single zone EnergyPlus model, and as such the individualoutput parameters should represent the single zone model more accurately. The commissioning recommendations are going to be compared against the fully zone model of the COBE building. The fully zoned COBE building has been calibrated according to ASHRAE's standards and is a more accurate representation of the actual building than the single zone model. Common energy consumption metrics between the two models were chosen for comparison with the parameters being the zone heating and cooling loads and the AHU coil energy consumptions. lt should be noted that the heating a cooling loads do not account for system efficiency, it is the ideal load that will keep the space conditioned at the given set point, given all ambient and internal effects. The zone heating and cooling load was chosen to improve errors caused by the VAV box system efficiency. The ROM did not include any measure of efficiency, makingthe modeled value more representative of a load, and not a consumption. lf this parameter was not chosen for comparison, it would have to be assumed that VAV box system efficiency is independent of the heating or cooling load, which is typically not the case. The losses in the terminal box are from the heat exchanger, where the efficiency of the unit being dependent of both fluid flows (supply air cross flow and hot water flow). The inlet and outlet temperature of the heat exchanger water was not modeled directly, so determining the VAV system lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 28 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) efficiency of the ROM was not feasible. This made it necessary to compare the ROM predicted terminal reheat energy usage to the EnergyPlus model's predicted heating and cooling load of the zone. ASHRAE has designated a comparison method for energy modeling and according to ASHRAE Guideline 14, the two recommend modes of comparison are the coefficient of variation of the root mean square error (CVRMSE) and the normalized mean bias error (NMBE). ASHRAE Guideline 14 considers a building model calibrated with hourly data to have a CVRMSE within the range of *30%, and NMBE in the range of +tO% [1a]. The CVRMSE and the NMBE error are shown below in Equations 8 and 9 respectively xI n-(8) CVRMSE =t z!:r(y, - g,)(e) NMBE:(n - p)v Where li and li are the ROM and EnergyPlus predicted value respectively, n is the number of sample data points, p is the number of parameters in the baseline model used in comparison (in this case one), and y is the arithmetic mean of the EnergyPlus observations. The CVRMSE value is representative of how well the two parameter values trend together throughout the year. Whereas the NMBE is an indication of how accurate the overall magnitudes compare to one another. Both values must fall within the range set by ASHRAE to be considered 'calibrated'. Typically, this standard is used to compare the energy consumption predicted by an energy model and the actual building energy consumption, as reported on the energy bills, but this method should still serve valid when comparing one energy model to another. The amount of heating or cooling supplied to the zone is, in part, a function of the supply air flow rate. This parameter was compared by looking at the difference between the daily average values lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 29 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) between the ROM and the single zone EnergyPlus model, otherwise known as the residuals. A histogram of the daily average residualvalues is shown below in Figure 12 35 30 2!at !8o& i Ez$ t0 .2.1 .2 -1,5 a5 r5 DatyAtflF tueud Imr6l Figure 12. Daily Average Supply Air Flow Rate Residual The daily average difference between EnergyPlus and the ROM is -0.095 m3/s.The CVRMSE and the NMBE for the supply air flow rate were 6.057% and -0.561% respectively. These results are an indication that the flow rate was modeled correctly and the linear gain factor, as discussed earlier, are similar between the two models. The next parameter compared was the energy supplied to the zone. As discussed earlier, EnergyPlus does not decouple this parameter from the VAV energy consumption, making the comparison only possible if the HVAC heat and cooling zone loads are used from EnergyPlus. These heating and cooling Ioads are going to be compared to the ROM predicted value of energy supplied to the zone, as seen in Equations 7 and 8. These two parameters are comparable due to the fact that the heating and cooling supplied to the zone, disregarding efficiency, should be the amount of energy required to maintain the space at the thermostat set point, otherwise known as a 'load'. lf the thermal parameters have been estimated correctly, the zone load and the supplied energy should be equivalent, which indicates both lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 30 Using reduced-order models for simulatlon based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) models have the same effective overall heat transfer coefficient. A histogram of the residuals can be seen below in Figure 13 Figure 13. Daily Average Zone Demand Residual The CVRMSE and the NMBE for the Zone Deman d was 63.7% and 2.38% respectively. The zone demand showed poor performance for the CVRMSE, but that should be expected. ROMs lump masses together and assume each mass has an equivalent temperature, varying the magnitude of heat transfer at any given time when compared to EnergyPlus. The NMBE shows the two models use similar overall magnitudes of energy throughout the year which indicates the model is performing as expected. The average daily residual was approximately -1,336 watts, meaning the ROM is predicting a zone energy demand of 1,336 watts less than EnergyPlus. This is what should be expected after the ROM zone temperature was over predicted, as seen in the previous chapter. This over prediction of zone temperature equates to the HVAC system having to add less thermal energy to condition the zone and match the thermostat set points. The last parameter compared was the total energy consumption of conditioning the building, which includes the energy supplied to preconditioning the air stream after the mixing chamber and at lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 31 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) the terminal boxes. The total energy consumption does not include any mechanical energy consumed by the supply or return fans, this parameter is just the thermal energy supplied to the air stream. The first method of comparison was with an energy signature of the COBE building as predicted by both models. An energy signature is a plot of the energy consumption vs. the average ambient temperature, typically tabulated daily [15]. Characterizing building using an energy signature offers a quick comparison to determine how the building is performing and is a way to graphically illustrate the amount of heating or cooling required for any given outdoor temperature conditions. The energy signature of the COBE building, as predicted by the ROM, was compared against the EnergyPlus energy signature, which is shown in Figure 14. t !8,,# E 6 r---: c , 1 'arl =o ,- U ? !.,4 a7 .,-' 3$ < !r.1: , ? 3 !E EIo ts t ! Es.} co] c \_11 tTIa/. nn i/ \\. rA {f- t' .1 ,/,r t, ,,,1-r) t -'fa'. Avcr.lc Wrllly Ambl.ntlcfig.ratue Iq Av6ttc WGGHV AmbilntTlrylpe6ture Iq , lmrirllur@l " tOutdr6r-nm.. lttrrlrfi6fdlEUilI{llDMMh{l ' t'!'r0'lxrhErra ' itilk€ilry-q''wll@}h!tbiqr-lins'l{OM*81n4) Figure 14. EnergyPlus and Reduced Order Model Energy Signature of COBE Building. (Left - Cooling Energy Signature, Right - Heating Energy Signature) The balance temperature of the building is the ambient temperature at which the building does not require heating or cooling after adjusting for internal loads was determined to be approximately 2.5oC for both the EnergyPlus and the reduced order model. Both heating and cooling energy signatures from the reduced order model are similar to the predicted signatures from EnergyPlus. This is an indication that both model have similar thermal properties. However, the cooling energy signature for the reduced order model mirrors that of the EnergyPlus' model better than the heating energy signature. This is lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 32 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) thought to originate from the terminal reheat VAV box sub model. The daily average residuals were also calculated and a histogram of the results can be seen below in Figure 15. Figure 15. Daily Average Total Energy Demand Residual Histogram The total energy demand residual had an average of approximately -1,401 watts. The overall CVRMSE and the NMBE for the total energy demand when compared to EnergyPlus was 42.4% and 1.7o/o respectively. This is indicating that the ROM is using, on average, 1,40L watts less energy per hour than the EnergyPlus model. This error originates from the same over estimation of the ROMs zone temperature, as discussed above. The ROM accurately predicted the magnitude of total energy consumption when comparing the results to the previous EnergyPlus model. The CVRMSE value was greater than allowed by the ASHRAE standard, but due to how the model lumps various thermal masses together this variance is to be expected. The ROM is verified to be an accurate representation of the COBE building and the next step is using this model as a tool for virtual commissioning by looking for recommendations that can yield realized energy saving at the COBE building in Moscow. X lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 33 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) 5.1 Virtual Commissioning The team was allowed remote access to the EMS for the COBE building at the University of ldaho, and while logging into the system we noticed that the building was operating in "occupied" mode at a time when the building should have been unoccupied. While running in occupied mode the HVAC conditions the building to different temperature set points and uses more electricity than when operating in unoccupied mode. We logged in several times and the problem persisted which points to the discrepancy not being by chance, but on overall operational and control issue. This was confirmed in a follow-up meeting with the facilities team at the end of the project. The reduced order model was used to determine the energy savings associated with having thermostat setbacks. Table 3 shows the current and recommend thermostat settings, which were the values used in the study. Table 3. Current and Recommended Thermostat Set Points Occupancy Stotus Current Thermostot Set Points 22.78 Recom mended Thermostot Set Points 24.0 26.7 The values for the current set points were determined by examining the trend logs of zone temperatures from the COBE's EMS system. The values represent an average of the zones. The recommended thermostat set points were determined using ASHRAE's Standard 90.1 [15]. We found by having thermostat setbacks during unoccupied times, it would save approximately 9.6% of HVAC energy consumption. This study was also conducted using the fully calibrated COBE EnergyPlus model that was developed during the previous Avista Research Grant. With the full EnergyPlus model, it is predicted to save approximately 9.97% of heating and cooling energy by adjusting the thermostat set points. This Heating Set Point trl Cooling Set Point trl Occu pied/U noccupied 20.0 Occupied Unoccupied 21.0 15.6 I lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 34 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) energy savings does not include pump of fan power savings; the reported value is only the amount of energy consumed while conditioning the space. The 9.6% energy savings equates to approximately 104,000 kWh annually. The access to live data provided two other insights that could lead to significant energy savings at the site. The economizer was unable to run in integrated mode and would lock out the cooling coil any time it was engaged. The outdoor air sensor was also located in a concrete well and was not providing accurate readings of the outdoor air intake. ln the words of one of the facilities managers: "it's whacked." Our team was able to coordinate a meeting with several facilities and HVAC managers at the University of ldaho as well as several representatives from Avista to discuss the findings and follow up on these issues. The discussion served to make several connections and spur action on correcting these issues. The controls contractor is sending out a service engineer on Tuesday September 5th to specifically address the outdoor air sensor, setback scheduling, and correcting of the air handler/economizer operation at the COBE building. 6. DrscussroN AND Furunu Wonr lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 35 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) This research has shown that using ROM for virtual building commission is a viable option for whole building commissioning. This approach lessens the time and money constraints that are prohibitive for many building owners. The difference between the results of the fully-zoned EnergyPlus model and the reduced order model was insignificant when predicting the amount of energy savings from thermostat setbacks. Approximately 104,000 kWh annually can be saved with temperature setbacks during unoccupied periods. Without access to accurate data from the COBE building, outputs from the previously developed EnergyPlus model had to be used to find the thermal parameters of the ROM. ldeally, this method of building modeling would be a standalone process and would not rely on an EnergyPlus model; all the ROM inputs would be calculated, or measured, or estimated using ASHRAE standard 90.1 [16]. For ROM virtually commissioning to progress, there needs to be research done in calculating the thermal parameters of the building without using software optimization. Promising results were achieved at determining the parameters using the buildings response for the BESTEST case study. lt was shown that the thermal parameters could be determined both ways, through optimization and through numerically fitting the parameters to best fit the building's thermal decay of energy. The differences between the time constants of the two models were insignificant and would have minimal effects on the overall building energy consumption. The method of using the buildings temperature decay needs to be further investigated, and eventually needs to be used with an actual building to see if the parameters can be found from a large temperature setback similar to the process used in the BESTEST case study. The facilities team were open to learning about the results and have blocked out a day to address each of the commissioning issues found during this research. Data will continue to be collected at the site so that the savings might be verified and used as an example for future commissioning projects and applications for incentives. A group meeting between University of ldaho facilities, Avista, and IDL on lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 35 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) August 29th served to enhance understanding between parties and build stronger partnerships for future efficiency projects. 7. Buoe rr SururueRv lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 37 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) These hours reflect only Avista's contribution to this project and are not reflective of total project investment by the research team, industry sponsors, or other university staff. FY76'-Y77 Personnel lAll Hourly Rotes are overages over FY76 and FY77) Salary: Support Requested for Elizabeth Cooper at 57 hours (551.28/hr), Dr. Jinchao Yuan at 75 hours (S40.15/hr), Damon Woods at 504 hours (S21.00/hr)and Sean Rosin at 820 hours (S16.00/hr). Total Salary amount requested for project period is 529,596. Fringe Benefits: Total Fringe requested for project period $2,422. Other Direct Costs Trovel: Estimated travel cost for project period $2,250 Operoting Expenses: Estimated research supply cost for project period is S1,500 Tuition: Estimated tuition costs for one graduate student for Fall of 2Ot6 and Spring of 2017 53,080 Indirect Costs For this contract, Ul-lDL was considered an on-campus unit of the University of ldaho with a federally negotiated rate of 50.3%. Personnel Hours estimate Description Elizabeth Cooper 56 Provide overall management of the project Jinchao Yuan, Ph.D., P.E.75 Provide technical support in supervising the student intern(s) Damon Woods, P.E.504 Provide technical support and execute daily tasks of this project Sean Rosin 820 Execute daily tasks of this project Integrated Design Lab I Boise 38 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) 8. RerrReucrs t1I 12) t3l L7l t8I IeI ASHRAE. (2005). ASHRAE Guideline 0-2005: "The Commissioning Process". Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. Nouidui, T., Wetter, M., Li, 2., Pang, X., Bhattacharya, P., & Haves, P. (2011). BacNet and Analog/Digital lnterfaces of the Building Controls Virtual Testbed. Conference of lnternationol Building Performonce Simulation Associotion, (pp. 294-301). Sydney. Haves, P., & Xu, P. (2007). The Building Controls VirtualTest Bed - A Simulation Environment for Developing and Testing Control Algorithms Strategies and Systems. lnternotionol Building Performance Simulotion Association (pp. 1,440-1,446). Beijing: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. l4l Nouidui, T., Wetter, M., Li, 2., Pang, X., Bhattachatya, P., & Haves, P. (2011). BacNet and Analog/Digital lnterfaces of the Building Controls Virtual Testbed. Conference of lnternotionol Building Performonce Simulotion Associotion, (pp. 294-301). Sydney. Harish, V. S. K. V., & Kumar, A. (2015). A Review on Modeling and Simulation of Building Energy Systems. Renewable and Sustoinoble Energy Reviews, 56, 1272-1292. IsI l6I Amara, F., Agbossou, K., Cardenas, A., Dube, Y., & Kelouwani, S. (2015). Comparison and Simulation of Building Thermal Models for Effective Energy Management. Smart Grid and Re newo bl e Ene rgy, 6, 95-112. Antonopoulos, K. A., & Koronaki , E. (1997). Apparent and Effective Thermal Capacitance of Buildings. Notional Technical University of Athens, 42, 183-192 Kulakowski, B. T., Gardner, J. F., & Shearer, L. L. (2007). Dynomics Modeling ond Control of Engineering Systems (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Rabl, A. (1988). Parameter Estimation in Buildings: Methods for Dynamic Analysis of Measured Energy Use. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 1-10,52-66. t10l Bacher, P., & Madsen, H. (2011). ldentifying Suitable Models for the Heat Dynamics of Buildings. Energy and Buildings, 43, 1511-1522. [11] Li, J. (2015, August). Modeling and Analysis of an Air Handling Unit to lmprove Energy Efficiency. Purdue University. U2l Trane. (2005). Keeping Cool with Outside Air - Airside Economizers. Trone Engineers Newsletter lntegrated Design Lab I Boise 39 Using reduced-order models for simulation based commissioning of buildings (Report 1608_01) [13] Liu, G., Zhang, J., & Dasu, A. (2012, March). Review of Literature on Terminal Box Control, Occupancy Sensing Technology and Multi-zone Demand Control Ventilation (DCV). U.S. Department of Energy. l14l ASHRAE. (2002). ASHRAE Guideline 14 - Meosurement of Energy ond Demond ond Water Savings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating and Refrigerating Engineers. [1s]Hitchin, R., & Knight, l. (2015). Daily Energy Consumption Signatures and Control Charts for Air- Conditioned Buildings. Energy and Buildings, 772, 101-109. [16] ASHRAE. (2016). ANSI/ASHRAE Stondord 90.1-20L6: "Energy Stondord for Buildings Except Low- Rise Residential Building". Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air- Conditioning Engineers. APPENDIX I lnterim Report: RSVC Year 4 frYlsta B AE--stsrrrBOISE SYATE UNlVERSITY A DEMAND-SIDE APPROACH TO CONSERVATION BY VOLTAGE REGULATION ENABLED BY RESIDENTIAL STATIC vAR COMPENSATORS (RSvCs) Project Duration: September 2017 - August 2018 Project Cost: Total Funding $90,574 OBJEGTIVE The overall goal of the RSVC project during Year IV is to simulate, design, and implement a laboratory prototype of a Residential Static VAR Compensator (RSVC) equipped with two automatic control loops for customer load voltage regulation and minimum load power consumption. The faster voltage regulation control loop regulates the customer load voltage to any desired reference voltage within Range A of ANSI C84.1 (120 V nominal plus or minus 5olo) and a secondary slower control loop adjusts the reference voltage to track the point of minimum power consumption by the customer load. This is a new approach to conservation by voltage regulation (CVR) which is tailored to the nature of the customer load, which may decrease or increase its energy consumption under a reduced voltage. This demand-side approach to CVR is a radical depafture from current strategies which have been in existence for over 30 years but have not been widely adopted by electric utilities due to high costs and technical challenges. BUSINESS VALUE The deployment of multiple RSVCs offers a cost-effective method for energy savings by applying conservation by voltage regulation during peak demand hours. It can become a valuable tool in a utility energy efficiency and demand-side management programs. INDUSTRY NEED AND BACKGROUND The new single-phase RSVC device has a distinct advantage over a conventional shunt capacitor of being able to operate in a capacitive or inductive mode without generating substantial harmonics. This RSVC employs a pulse-width-modulation (PWM) technique applied to two specially-designed bidirectional switches controlling the variable reactive power output. This flexible device can be used in multiple applications such as continuous voltage control at a load point, power factor control, mitigation of power quality issues, etc. The new RSVC device is a competitive device on several fronts including cost, footprint, and smart-grid applicability or compatibility. Figure 1 shows the prototype of the open-loop RSVC developed during previous phases of the project. Several relevant studies were carried out to study of the operation of an RSVC for regulating a residential voltage and to study the potential benefits of deploying multiple RSVCs on the residential side of distribution networks. Transformer Output Voltage Figure l: Simulation Model for RSVC PROJEGT TASKS - Year !V Project Management Internal weekly project coordination meetings take place every Wednesday morning. Bi- weekly status meetings with Avista are scheduled on Thursdays. Task 1: Voltage Regulation Loop Design The objective of this task is to design and implement the voltage regulation loop for an RSVC using MATLAB/S|mulink models. This control loop regulates the residential voltage by changing the reactive power provided by a PWM-based switched inductor. Figure 2 showsa top-level block diagram for both control loops. ,lFeeder Voltage Lslc sw1 Based Bidirectional Switch Switched InductorSwitch Fixed Csvc Figure 2: RSVC Voltage and Power Regulation Loops Task 2: Power Regulation Loop Design The RSVC power regulation loop is designed as a slower control loop than the inner voltage control loop to build an inherent time decoupling between the two control loops and to avoid a possible loop interaction. This task consists of designing a minimum power point algorithm (derived from maximum power point tracker available in the literature) that will track the power consumed by the residential customers with the objective of reducing the customer power. Simulation results for the two control loops show that the output power for a 2 kW resistive load can be reduced 1.8 kW by reducing the residential voltage from 120 toLl4 V. Figure 3 below shows the power consumption reduced as a result of decreasing the voltage. Voltags Regulation Control Loop prototype consisted of a 190-pF capacitor anda 30-mH inductor choke. Preliminary test results were compiled at 60 VAC with a 20-ohm resistive load. The switching frequency for the switches was varied between 3 kHz and 12 kHz. Table 1 shows the RSVC output voltage (Vo) and RSVC power losses (PL) as a result of varying the duty cycle at discrete frequencies. Table l: Hardware Prototype Results In the next phase of hardware development,the voltage regulation loop will be implemented using a voltage transducer measuring a replica of the RSVC voltage which is also the customer load voltage. The power loop will require the same voltage transducer as well as a current transducer monitoring the customer load current. The two transducer outputs will allow the computation of the average power consumed by the load. Task 4: Testing of an RSVC prototype in a Iaboratory or home environment These tasks are ongoing. PROJEGT TEAM SGHEDULE 2125 o < 120 e 115 o g 21oo izooo ' rsoooc; 18004! 1700 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 time (sec) Powo. Rogulation Control Loop 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5 52.5 3 tlme (sec) Figure 3: Minimum power point tracking with 2 kW residential load (work in progress) Task 3: Design of a Functional Laboratory Prototype of an RSVC An RSVC prototype is being developed in a power laboratory at Boise State University. This prototype is based on the simulation model shown in Figure 1. The device can regulate a residential load voltage with a fixed capacitor in shunt with a reactor controlled by two bidirectional switches. The two switches are controlled in a complementary mannerusing a pulse-width-modulation (PWM) technique that allows the reactor to function asa continuously-variable inductor. An early 1 PI controller RSVC Voltag€ Retulation Control Loop Fille. RMS Vofrar€ I Block Control Loop Volta8e Reference lncrement (Av) 114,125 ) PolntAlsorlthm Fsw kHz DUTY CYCLE (D) OF SWTTCH SWI D=O D = O.5O D = O,71 D='l Vo (v) PL (w) Vo (v) PL (w) Vo (v) PL (IY) Vo (v) PL (lY) 3 75.4 9 72.4 L7 70.7 22 5B 19 6 75.4 9 72.5 1B 70.8 20 5B 19 9 75.4 9 72.5 19 70.6 27 5B 19 L2 75.4 9 72.4 22 70.8 29 5B 19 PR!NCIPAL !NVESTIGATORS Name Dr. Said Ahmed-zaid Orqanization Boise State University Email sahmedza idfOboisestate.edu Name Dr. John Stubban Oroanization Boise State Universitv Email iohnstubban @boisestate.edu RESEARGH ASSISTANTS Name Muhammad Kamran Latif Orqanization Boise State University Email muhammadlatif(ou. boisestate.edu Name Ziyanq Lianq Oraanization Boise State Universitv Email zivano liano@u- boisestate.edu TASK TIME ALLOCATED START DATE FINISH DATE Task 1 3 month SeD'17 Oct'17 Task 2 4 months Nov'1 7 Dec'17 Task 3 1 month SeD'17 Mav'18 Task 4 2 months Jun'18 Auq'18 Task 5 2 months Julv'18 Auq'18 The information contained in this document is proprietary and confidential. I VoltaSe frusta APPENDIX J lnterim Report: Energy Storage Universityotldaho AFwsrn College of Engineering Framework for Siting and Sizing Energy Storage for Enhanced Peformance of the Avista System Project Duration: 12 months Project Cost: $83,712.89 OBJECTIVE To develop and trial-test a Distribution Resources Plan (DRP) appropriate for the nofthern region of Idaho. The DRP will include methods for integration capacity analysis (ICA) and locational net benefits analysis (LNBA). These analyses, respectively, determine how many distributed energy resources (DER) the system can handle and how the value of those DERs will be calculated. To test these methods, a section of interest of the Avista utility grid will be modeled in GridLAB-D. After this model is verified, the ICA and LNBA methods will be applied. Using the results the methods will be refi ned. BUSINESS VALUE In recent years, DERs such as solar panels have been seen as a means to reduce electrical costs to the facility to which it is attached. DER also reduce power lost during transmission from a distant power plant, Another class of DER, energy storage, may be needed to compensate for non-dispatchable renewable generation. By solving local power issues, DERcan defer or eliminate costly system improvement projects. DRPs help a utility plan and utilize DER efficiently. INDUSTRY NEED Renewable energy has been shaking the utility industry in the last decade. Solar panels andother renewable resources break the traditional utility model and are becoming increasingly popular as a source of "green" energy as the price drops to within par of traditional electricity rates. Unlike nuclearplants and other sources of traditional generation, most sources of renewable generation are unable to be dispatched. Unplanned and haphazard integration of renewable generation and other DER can put local system stability at risk. Careful planning and control will manage the risk that DER bring so all parties can fully enjoy the benefits. Thus utilities are motivated to develop policies regarding DER in a DRP such as an ICA. BACKGROUND As the cost of renewable energy has become increasingly competitive with traditional sources of energy, utilities are pressured to include more DER. In order to safely and efficiently use DER, utilities need to update their traditional distribution planning processes to incorporate DER. California's investor owned utilities (IOUs) have integrated DERs into theplanning process by using DRPs. This document outlines the companies plan to measure the system capacity for DER and possible new economic models to cover this new service. Such a plan can forestall the needto upgrade transmission infrastructure by using a local non-wired solution. SGOPE Task 1: Research Existing DRPs The research into existing DRPs focused on the DRPs submitted by California IOUs. These documents were found on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) webpage. Notes were taken on the DRPs starting with the one submitted by San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). These notes were then compiled and processed into the Final Research Report. This research provides a baseline knowledge of the methods of other utilities who are also solving the problem of distributed resource planning. Task 2: Familiarize with Avista Policies Research Avista's needs and policies to begin development of a locational net benefits model. The teams observations were developed into a Midterm Research Report. Task 3: Learn GridLAB-D GridLAB-D is a new power distribution system simulation and analysis tool. One of its defining features is its ability to model emerging smart grid energy technologies. This feature coupled with its ability to be integrated with a variety of third-party data management and analysis tools makes GridLAB-D a leading resource for testing integrated capacity and locational net benefits analyses. The team will learn the GridLAB-D program to prepare for modeling a representative sectionof the Avista system where a non-wires solution could be applied to solve near-term challenges. This reduces modeling time after the target section data is received. Task 4: GridLAB-D Modeling The target section data will be received in the Common Information Model (CIM) format. The team will convert this data into a GridLAB-D model. Task 5: lntegrated Capacity Analysis Once the GridLAB-D model is complete, the team will implement SDG&E's ICA method. This method divides the target section's feeders into zones and then inserts increasingly greater generation until a thermal, voltage, or protection limit is violated. The results of the analysis will be added into the Final Research Report. Task 6: LocationalValue Pricing SDG&E's locational net benefits method will be applied to 3 different locations in the GridLAB- D model. The pricing for each location can then be calculated and the results will be compared and added into the Final Research Report. DELIVERABLES o Midterm and Final Research Reports. GridLAB-D model of a representative part of the Avista power system where a non-wires solution could be applied to solve near-term challenges. Results of ICA of the GridLAB-D model. Describe options for performing Integration Capacity Analysis. Describe options for performing Locational Net Benefits Analysis PROJECT TEAM SCHEDULE Appendices A: Midterm Research Report Schnitker, Maximilian; Flyn, Nicholas; Alruwaili, Barjas; Chen, Tianyi. Mid-Term Research Report. First-Term Research Summary. University of Idaho. tL/27/20t7 PRTNGTPAL !NVESTTGATOR(S) Name Dr. Herbert Hess Orqanization University of Idaho Contact #(208) 885 - 4341 Email hhess@uida ho.edu Name Dr. Brian lohnson Oroanization University of Idaho Contact #(208) 885 - 6902 Email bioh nson @u idaho. edu Name Dr. Yacine Chakhchoukh Orqanization Universitv of idaho Contact #(208) 885 - 1550 Email vacinec@ uidaho. ed u RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Name Jacob Dolan Orqanization Universitv of Idaho Email dola9260@vandals. uidaho.edu Name Maximilian Schnitker Orqanization University of Idaho - Senior Desiqn Email schn6884@vandals.uidaho.edu Name Nicholas Flynn Orqanization University of Idaho - Senior Desiqn Email Flvn1026@vandals.uidaho.edu Name Barjas Alruwaili Orqanization Universitv of Idaho - Senior Desiqn Email alru4168@vandals.uidaho.edu Name Tianvi Chen Oroanization University of Idaho - Senior Desiqn Email chen 1285@vandals.uidaho.edu TASK TIME ALLOGATED {# Months} START DATE FINISH DATE Research Existinq DRPS 4 09/77 01/ 18 Familiarize with Avista Policies 2 09/t7 7t/77 Learn GridLAB-D 3 tt/17 02/74 GridLAB-D Modelinq 2 02/78 04/78 Inteorated CaDacitv Analvsis L 04/78 05/18 Locationa Value Pricinq 2 03/18 05/18 The information contained in this document is proprietary and confidential, First Term Rese arch ^ Authors: Maximilian Schnitker, Nick Flynn, Barjas Alruwaili, Tianyi Chen FIRST TERM REPORT UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO SERIOR DESIGN TEAM: A REACTIVE FUTURE 2017 -r- Table of Contents Section L: Economics between energy vs capacity.,,.,2 ....3Section 2: The relationship between renewable energy resources and peaking facilities. Section 3: Research Topics ,4 Generation Strategy.. Transmission Load Studies and Seasonal Operational Constraints Operational Guidelines for System Flexibility.... .........10 Section 4: Detailed Design.........L3 Works Cited 17 ,,.,,,4 ......5 Section 1: Economics between energy vs capacity. Energy is the amount of electricity customers consume over time measured in Megawatt-hours. Capacity is related to the peak demand and is the total amount of generation the company has available. Capacity is measured in megawatts and represents a power plant's potential to generate electricity. Energy and capacity have different markets. ln an energy market electricity is treated like any other commodity while capacity is the amount of available energy to the public. Energy is bought at wholesale value then resold at retail value and capacity can be created by enlarging the infrastructure or upgrading existing hardware. Capacity is funded by the consumers of electricity. The cost of operations and maintenance is spread across the energized grid to keep the retail cost of energy low for the consumer. Section 2: The relationship between renewable energy resources and peaking facilities. Peaking facilities are resources that provide power during the peak demand hours of the day They are the last power plants to be turned on and the last to provide power during peak demand. Some common peaking plants are combustion turbine generation, natural gas fired generation, and hydroelectric generation. An emerging alternative to peaking facilities is electrical storage. Currently storage has a higher upfront cost than peaking facilities but may add more flexibility than peaking facilities. Storage hasthe abilityto start up much fasterthan peakingfacilities, and its output can be varied faster than peaking facilities. There are two types of storage that could be used to replace peaking facilities. Bulk facilities that would be comprised of one plant that may be far away from the load, and distributed storage located nearthe load. Bulkfacilitieswould likely be pumped hydroelectric storage while distributed storage could be PV or batteries. While up-front costs of energy storage are still high the benefits from it may make it a better option over traditional peaking facilities. Section 3: Research Topics Generation Strategy To meet current customer loads Avista's assets include ownership of eight hydroelectric developments, partial ownership in two coal fired units, five natural gas fired projects, and a biomass plant. Avista also purchases energy from several independent producers, including Palouse Wind, Rathdrum Power, and the city of Spokane. Avista's largest supply in the peak winter months comes from hydroelectric al51% the second largest is natural gas. A small portion of customers have installed their own generation systems. Over the past two years the number of customers installing their own generation has been increasing. lf this continues to increase Avista may need to adjust their rate structures for customers who rely on the utilities infrastructure, but do not contribute financially for infrastructure costs. ln Avista's lntegrated resource plan they clearly layout what their preferred generation resource strategy for the future is. The IRP uses a decision support system called PRISM to develop their preferred resource strategy. PRISM evaluates resource values by combining operating margins with capital and fixed operating costs. Then uses a number of inputs to develop an optimal resource mix over time at varying levels of risk. The preferred plan for the future includes the existing resources along with thermal resource upgrades, energy efficiency, demand response, storage, and natural gas fired peaking plants. Also included is a 15MW solar facility for Avista's voluntary solar select program. The selected storage unit has a 5MW capacity rating, and 15MWh of storage. These resources combined with the existing resources satisfy the generation needs until 2037. Transmission Load Studies and Seasonal Operational Constraints Native Load Avista's peak hour is in winter, and that's between November and early February. However, the use of air conditioners in the summer months creates a peak load higher than those of winter. Avista stated that the summer peak load is sometimes higher than the winter peak load. Avista highest peak load was at'J,821MW in winter 2009. ln the last 20 years Avista's native peak load growth rate was 0.74 percent in the winter and 0.85 percent in summer, as shown in the figure 4.A. Figure 4-A (Groph of notive load Jorecost) Winter Balancing Authority Area (BAA) Load Figure 4.8 shows the balancing area variations of the load between 2000 to 2030 and that's during the winter season. The power consumption reached a maximum at 2350 MW in 2008. Also Avista has predicted a forecast of the peak load based on the current data. According to the prediction from 2018 to 2030 the average peak load is roughly 2500 MW. The power reaches the maximum peak load of approximately 2500 MW in 2030. 2,200 2,ffi t.800 .r,600 1,4{]{} I,2()0 r,ooo cDmSFAmnF@?oaE@noEtsa a8 B aa E 6E 5 5 BBa g I BB A INNNNNCTNNNNNNilNNNNfrN - ,lAllnt:r. Hlgh - - - Wlntcr- Low .- Summr' Hlgh * - Sumrnor- Low I a a;a!EIG = 7 3Ufl tmfi rfipr( [,** l r-* lHto tril00 u$.!0 Wlnttr Brhnclnf Arce Forscr:t .t,, p J ,'| \./ c4.nn . . , trl10krsrt - ' IgUFc*rt * .l$Utffit "* U1lrffit * lgla Fq.Brr I0llFffir -l0lfFmd Figure 4-B (Graph of winter bolancing area lood for orea lood forecast) Summer Balancing Authority Area (BAA) Load During the summer season, in 2074 the peak load reached a maximum of 2109 MW. According to the forecast from 2018 to 2030 the average peak load is roughly 2300 MW. The maximum forecasted peak load is approximately at 2350 MW in 2030. The summer experiences linear growth during the next decade, as shown in figure 4-C. Sufitm.r Olhnclng Atar Forrca.t It "lt t0 iL.i"! . ttotM - - flllxff5 - ,ulfrrt --. ttltl tfl*E ' tr4tru -*rl.ltt5 -:glla*inrt Figure 4-C (Groph of the summer boloncing area load forecost) **l ,:-l "** I".- I IEdtoo I I*l .t** l I,** im ln fact, the unusual growth of the peak load is basically related to the increasing number of the population over the few years. Distribution Planning The primary goal of the distribution resource plan is to supply safe and reliable service to all customers, efficiently at the lowest life cycle cost. The integrated resource plan and distribution resource plan (DER) includes Solar, Storage, Conservation, Commercialand lndustrial (C&l) Backup Generation, C&l Demand Response. The problem is that the benefits are much larger than the costs. An example of this is the 5 MW Solar array in Othello, WA (summer peaking feeder) (S/MWh Levelized). The valued benefits are SgZ.Zg per MWh, but the costs are expected to be S55 to 565 per MWh for a long-term power purchase agreement (PPA) Figure 4-D (Toble of PRiSM economics) For optimizing DER Value, there are foundational enabling systems smart grid demonstration & amp, investment projects including American recovery and reinvestment act grants, smart line devices and distribution management system, fault detection, isolation and restoration -reliability, integrated volt/var control -energy efficiency, advanced metering infrastructure pilot project. For future enabling systems, there is a Washington advanced metering infrastructure project concerning communication Energy Peqk rEduetion Defened T&D capital Reduoed line losses Reduced portfElio risk Ancitlary services {storage I lrnproved re liabil ity (storage1 Senefrts Costs Capttalrecdvery Taxes o&M TRC {consarvation} Energy consurnpiion {slomge I mis;/! Ecanomics network and a supervisory control and data acquisition expansion project. This project utilizes three- I frvlg,ta phase measurement at substation feeders. There are two Pilot projects, One is Turner Energy Storage Project - Washington Department of Commerce. lt is a 1MW - 3.5 MWhr Vanadium Flow Battery and it is located Adjacent to SEL Manufacturing. Another is called Shared Energy Economy - Washington Department of Commerce. lt has Solar, Storage and Building Management Systems. lt is located in the University District - Spokane, Washington. Figure 4-E (Shored energy Diogrom) Currently, Avista has 346 circuits but only 195 Circuits have 3-Phase Supervisory Control and data Acquisition (SCADA). Avista determined that to upgrade all the circuits with SCADA which would cost S115M l,:j Operational Guidelines for System Flexlbility The ability to tolerate and adjust a system to variations in operating conditions is a possible definition of flexibility in a system. However, the concept of flexibility can be multidimensional and relies on the process or goal behind the analysis to explore the idea properly. Therefore, flexibility will be first defined under power grid conditions and mapped out for the purposes of operational guidelines. Within the idea of flexibility there are two distinctions that this paper will go into: Short-term flexibility and Long-term flexibility. Each of these terms will be defined to outline possible guidelines for future flexibility. Short-term flexibility is the ability to tolerate variations in the grid without changing large amounts of hardware. An example of short term flexibility would be the tap-changing transformers that alter voltage to offset the increased load. Long-term flexibility is the ease with which a system can be changed in a major way or one that alters the system's goal. An example of long-term flexibility is the ease of changing a small town or city's grid to include distributed energy resources as a main generation strategy. There are also three sections that this senior design group will incorporate into the design of products and services that are produced. These sections are: Smart Management, Smart Protection and Smart lnfrastructure. These concepts are often referred to by some researchers as key components to creating and maintaining system flexibility. Figure 4.F. Shows how Smart Protection, Management and lnfrastructure are related and additional ideas regarding each component. Smart Management is the maximum utilization of products, system objectives and potential cost to provide the greatest number of services available to the consumers. Smart management is a subsystem of a grid that will provide advanced control of various facets within the grid through two-way communication and other communication methods. An example of utilizing this component would be convincing customers to lower their power demand during peak demand times using real-time pricing. Smart Protection is the subsystem that would provide advanced grid reliability analysis, fault protection, security and privacy protection. This protection focuses on providing effective and efficient mechanisms for detecting faults and minimizing the damages Smart lnfrastructure provides the hardware that connects the other components of the smart grid. With the proper infrastructure distributed energy resources can be utilized effectively with smart communication via wireless, digital network. Flexibility can be linked to the available hardware in a power grid and can be created by addition of equipment and therefore capacity. These hardware additions can provide needed redundancy throughout the system and thus supply additional flexibility With each of these components there is the opportunity to analysis a system for improvement. Flexibility, in many ways, is the resiliency of a system undergoing various input changes and reacting to these changes without resorting to operations failure. ln this senior design project, we will be analyzing a section of the power grid for possible advances of flexibility toward Avista and the consumer. There are numerous methods for testing systems and figure 4-F can act as a rubric for potential solutions into system analysis and design for future projects. . Smart Protection System . System reliablity and failure protection . System reliablityr FnilEG protection lKhrnign . failure prediction and prevention . failure identification, diagnosis, and recoyery. tuilwe idcatiMiq azd lw.fratim . @idsef-heofinC. Mr@v€ry. Microgrid prtection . Seorlty and privacy . lnfsrption fiEtEring and reazuruntntr lnfqmation trmmisdon Smart Grid $ r Smart Management System . ManaEemmt obiectlYes o Errtr8, eficrry ard danand pmfik . Oemand profileshaping. Energy loss minimizEtion ' tltilitg rost, ond prkc . Emiriq. Mana8sm€flt metlods and tools . optittiz*bn. Cofir€x prqra'Iunhg . Dfnamic programming . Stodrdtic prcgramming . Robust pmgnmming ' hrtiderwarm optimiz*ionr l*achinc bsning . 6aqE tfietry . Atdlrn . Smsrt lnfrastructurc Systcm o smaat energy subsyrtem. ?orcr r:c,sltim.Immmisiangll . Distribolionerid. iltw grfrt pradkm: mirogid aod grl*to- vd$clel*hkle-to-grid . trnart info nnation subrytem r hfom*im metgiqad nagrcrncnt. Smrt rneter. Scnsor . Phawmeilremmtmil. lr*omstim msaaanpnt r Dabrnodeliq. lnhrmation anatF4 intEgration, 6nd optimidon r Srnart cammur&atinn srbrytem. wbdcsE. Witdesrme*fi networl<s. Ca$rar mmrmrnlction it*ems. Cognfive radio. Wi.elcss comrnuni(atonsbas€d on 80115.4. SaHlite comnu.rnicatiorr. Mioorrarit or frEcrpacc odicd @mmuniEtions. llrhcd. Eb€r-oplic omExrniations. PdicrliErmictiru . En*tmdcmkation Figure 4-F (Diogram of smort grid relotionships) [1] lnfrastructure lBi:; ,l*rl -4 I rL. Section 4: Detailed Design The first step in our design will be determining the integration capacity of the circuit. lntegration Capacity" is the amount of DER capacity that can be installed on a distribution circuit without requiring significant distribution upgrades. From our locational value analysis research we know that the most successful locations are where the installation of DER's will not require significant upgrades. lnitialSoftware Setup: t. Become familiar with Gridlab-D and the Common lnformation Model data provided by the client 2 3 lmport the CIM data into Gridlab-D and begin capacity testing. Create a test system or use a sample system from Avista. lntegration Capacity Design: L. Divide each feeder into three segments by identifying the start and end of each impedance zone on the main feeder a. Determine the maximum impedance of each feeder. The size and number of segments may vary if the feeder is in an urban or rural area 2. Synthesize the circuit demand profile from AMl, SCADA, or other data, and input into Gridlab-D. This process may need more information on the Avista feeder or use a public data set from NREL. 3. Conduct power flow analysis to determine thermal and voltage limits on each line section a. Place a single 1MW generator, at unity power factor, at different points along each segment, and perform a power flow analysis to determine if the generator violates thermal or voltage limits anywhere along the feeder. lf a violation occurs then a smaller generator will be used and the power flow analysis rerun. lf no violations are identified, capacity of the generator will be increased and the power flow analysis rerun. This process will continue until a violation is identified or reverse power flow occurs. 4. Conduct short circuit analysis to determine protection limits on each line section. a. Model a single 1 MW generator, at unity power factor, at different points along each segment and perform a short circuit analysis to determine if the generator violates protection limits anywhere along the feeder. lf a violation occurs then a smaller generator will be used and a short circuit analysis will be rerun. lf no violations are identified, the generator's capacity will be increased and the short circuit analysis rerun. This process will continue until a violation is identified. Some protection limits that may be looked at are breakers interrupting duty and conductor limits. Also, will look into whether new relay setting would be needed or if relays/breakers are needed in new locations. 5. Once a violation is identified, the integration capacity will be the largest generation capacity that passes both analyze without any violations. For initial analysis the DER generation will remain below the minimum load on each circuit so that there is no reverse power flow back to the substation. We may also consider using generators that are not at unity power factor to increase the amount that may be added After the integration capacity is determined for the circuit. We will then use the results of our locational value analysis research to determine what type of projects have the potential for DER deferral. We will focus on mainly capacity and voltage regulation projects. The categories of avoided cost that we will look at: 7. New distribution substations, new distribution transformers, new distribution circuits, and reconductoring circuits, and new breakers 2. Capacitors, regulators, and substation transformer load tap changers to regulate voltage 3. New transmission substations, new transmission transformers, new transmission lines and reconductoring transmission lines. Some of the cost associated with these projects and DER projects that will be used in evaluating whether a DER project will be used over a traditional project are: 1,. Capital Expenditure- This consists of the net present value of the traditional project 2. Capital Expenditure of DER- This consists of the net present value of the DER 3. Capital Expenditure of interconnection- This consists of the cost of interconnecting the DER into the distribution grid. 4. Operation and maintenance- This represents the uninsured costs of not having to operate and maintain the traditional project 5. Operation and maintenance of DER- added cost of operation and maintaining the DER We will use all this data to determine where and what kind of traditional projects may be deferred with DER projects. For this part of the project we may need information from Avista for some rough DER's under consideration: 1. Energy Storage- Batteries used to lower the peak demand and eliminate circuit overload. Can also be used in conjunction with smart inverters to provide voltage regulation and power factor benefits estimates of these costs. 3 4 2. Dynamic voltage controllers- An inverter based device placed on the secondary side of a transformer that has a set voltage and can source or sink VER's to meet that voltage. PV with smart inverters- Used for voltage regulation Solid State Transformer- lntegrated transformer and power regulator, that regulates voltage, capabilities provides dynamic power compensation, and harmonic cancellation. Also, remote control Works Cited [1] Fang, X., Misra, S., Xue, G. and Yang, D. (2Dt7l. Smort Grid - The New ond lmproved Power Grid: A Survey - IEEE lournals & Magozlne. [online] leeexplore.ieee.org. Available at: http://ieeexpIore.ieee.orgldocument/60995191?part=L [Accessed ].0 Nov. 2017). [2] J. Newlander, Son Diego Gos ond Electric Distribution Resource Plon,1.st ed. San Diego: San Diego Gas and Electric ,20L5, pp.22-84. Available at: www.cpuc.ca.gov/WorkAreo/DownloodAsset.aspx?id=5L60 [Accessed 10 Nov. 20171. [3] C. Kalich, J. Gall, J. Lyons, G. Forsyth and R. Maguire, Avisto lntegroted Resource P/on. Spokane Avista, 2OL7, pp. 4:!-1-1.,11:1-13. Available at: https://www.mvavista.com/about-us/our- comoanv/intesrated-resource-planning [Accessed 10 Nov. 2017] [4] S. Waples, (2Ot7l. Avisto System Plonning Assessment [ebook] Spokane: Avista Transmission System Planning (Urbannova). Available at: http://www.oasis.oati.com/avat/index.html [Accessed 9 Nov. 20171. [5] James Gall, Avista Distribution and Transmission Planning,. Spokane: Avista, 20L7, pp.4-73. Available at: https://www.utc.wa.gov/ layoutsi 15/CasesPublicWebsite/GetDocument.ashx?doclD=137&year=201 6&docketNumber=1 61 024. APPENDIX K lnterim Report: IDL Temperature Efficiency frYtsta Universityolldaho Cottege of Art and Architecture Efficiency Based on Operative Temperatures AHwsrx Project Duration: 12 months Project Cost: Total Funding $24,011 OBJECTIVE The outline of the work is to profile typical thermostat setpoints found in operation, test alternative control methods, and estimate potential savings. This study, based on extensive data collection paired with energy modeling, would provide key insights on how to best balance thermal comfort and energy savings for small commercial office buildings in the Pacific Northwest. This research provides critical data to determine how effective an operative temperature strategy might impact both energy use and occupant comfort. The research leverages data analytics, energy modeling, and comfort standards to inform efficient control schemes that both save energy and ensure comfoft. BUSINESS VALUE Operative temperature control would allow for wider air temperature setpoints, thus saving energy each year. Increasing the cooling setpoint by 5oF has been shown to reduce total HVAC energy by 27o/o. The adoption of operative thermostats could result in widespread energy savings and dramatically enhance occupant comfoft, thus making it an attractive service to offer to clients. INDUSTRY NEED Most buildings manage their heating or cooling based solely on zone air temperature. Even when the thermostats are kept within a narrow band of 4oF, occupant complaints persist (Arens, et al., 2010). A large factor of human comfort is being missed in conventional thermostats: the inclusion of the mean radiant temperature. While operative temperature is widely used for predicting human comfort, rarely is it directly used in building controls. A control system that incorporates the operative temperature of a zone would allow for a wider range of supply air temperatures and better meet the needs of occupants. The wider rangeof air temperatures would reduce energy consumption and help to capitalize on operational features such as natural ventilation, night-flush and optimized set- points. BACKGROUND Many previous studies have established that the temperatures of the surfaces surrounding us have a far greater impact on our comfort than the air temperature (Olesen 2007). A better comfoft metric is the operative temperature which is a mix of air and surface temperatures. While operative temperature is widely used for predicting human comfoft, rarely is it directly used in building controls, SGOPE The new strategy will be modeled in annual EnergyPlus simulations. The EnergyPlus models will be informed by the temperature and thermostat data gathered at the site instead of ideal assumptions. The simulation results will be used to estimate energy savings and comfort impacts of incorporating surface temperatures into thermostat controls. The goal of the research is to identify the savings possible by shifting controls from their current baseline settings to a strategy that is more in line with the demands of occupant comfort. Task 1: Project Planning and Reporting Conduct team meetings and ongoing project updates, reports and deliverables as requiredby Avista staff, project management contractor and the PUC. Ongoing throughout the project. Task 2: Establish Baseline Setpoints The team will conduct a short literature reviewon typical operational setpoints of small commercial office spaces in practice and will reach out to controls engineers, consultants, and building operators in Avista territory to establish typical thermostat setpoints in operation. Task 3: Select Sites IDL will work with Avista to select several small commercial office buildings as case studies. One site in the Avista territory includes Lewiston Idaho's old city hall, now the public works office at 215 D street. The team will identify spaces within these selected buildings for testing. Task 4: Collect Operational Data The research team will deploy an array of data loggers to collect surface and air temperatures along with humidity levels. The team will work with the building operators to collect data on energy consumption and thermostat setpoints either through EMS recordings or by linking the building controls to a program like SkySpark that can catalog this information. Task 5: Develop Energy Model IDL will develop a basic energy model for the spaces selected in EnergyPlus for analysis. This will follow Task 3 and be in parallel with Task 4. Task 6: Test Alternative Controls Using the energy model, IDL will test thermostat setpoints based on the operative temperature instead of the air temperature. This work may begin at the start of the project for default building models and will be refined after the completion of Task 5. Task 7: Estimate Savings The team will study energy simulation results comparing the typical settings found in Task 1 against the alternative controls developed in Task 6. Task 8: Develop Workflow for Practitioners The final task will be a study of the process that will add to the current literature and promotethis technology service to furthercommercialization techniques. This documentation will be part of a master's student's academic work and publication in a conference or journal will be sought. DELIVERABLES . Project team has coordinated with several building managers and control personnel to gather current operational data and setpoints.. Project team has logged surface and air temperatures to create thermal comfoft profiles of selected spaces based on ASHRAE 55 criteria.. Project team has created simple EnergyPlus models to reflect the geometry and thermal properties of the selected spaces.. Project team has tested operative temperature control schemes on the energy model and compared the energy consumption and comfoft predictions to the original thermostat settings.. Project team is able to estimate typical energy savings for small commercial office buildings in the Pacific Northwest and present a replicable work flow witha control scheme that could be implemented into a case study. PROJECT TEAM SGHEDULE The information contained in this document is proprietary and confidential. PRTNCTPAL TNVESTTGATOR(S) Name Elizabeth CooDer Oroanization University of Idaho Inteqrated Desiqn Lab Contact #(208) 401-0644 Email ecoooer@u idaho. edu RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Name Damon Woods Oroanization Universitv of Idaho Inteorated Desion Lab Email dwoods@ u ida h o. ed u Name Neha Pokhrel Orqanization University of Idaho Inteqrated Desiqn Lab Email nookhrel@u idaho.edu Name Ryker Belnap Orqanization University of Idaho Inteqrated Desiqn Lab Email rbelnao@uidaho.edu TASK TIME ALLOGATEO START DATE FINISH DATE Proiect Planninq t2 08/t7 08/18 Establish Baseline Stots 2 05/t7 07 ttg Select Sites 2 08/L7 10/17 Collect ODerational Data 7 09/t7 07 /t7 DeveloD Enerov Models 5 toltT :/18 Test Alternative Controls 4 03/18 07/L8 Estlmate Savinos 3 05/18 07tt8 Develop Workflow TiEITI The information contained in this document is proprielary and confidential APPENDIX L lnterim Report: Aerogel Aivtsra Universityotldaho AHwsrfr College of Engineering Aerogel Insulation System: An Innovative Energy Efficient Thermal Wall Project Duration: 12 months Project Cost: Total Funding$88,777 OBJEGTIVE In 2015, about 4Oo/o of the total U.S. energy consumption was consumed in residential and commercial buildings, and the government promotes renovation of existing buildings tomeet minimum energy performance requirements. The main objective of this project is to investigate the efficiency of Aerogel insulation blankets as a new insulation material for residential buildings. The research tasks are conducted using field measurements and computer simulations. The field measurements are being collected from a real apaftment where walls were insulated with the Aerogel blankets. In parallel, a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) code is developed to validate the field data and perform additional key parameters. BUSINESS VALUE It is anticipated that the use of Aerogel reduces the heat transfer across building envelopes and therefore will reduce the annual heat loss by 50o/o compared to the currently used insulation material(s). In addition, a life cycle cost analysis with a full consideration of service life-cost will be performed and compared to the performance of conventional insulation materials. INDUSTRY NEED Energy sustainability is a crucial issue for the humanity's development in modern era, which can significantly impact future quality of life and the environment. The industry is moving towards the construction of sustainable-energy efficient buildings. The outcomes of the current research will be applied to help Avista customers save energy/ reducing need for natural gas and electricity. The Aerogel blankets will be efficiently used in retrofitting existi ng structures. BAGKGROUND Aerogel, also called solid smoke, is a synthetic porous material with remarkable properties. Aerogels are dried gels with a very high porosity. It was discovered in the early 1930s. Aerogel molecules do not decomposeat high temperatures and do not release harmful gases. Even at 800oC, the thermal conductivity of Aerogel is only 43 mw/(m. K).More information could be found in https://www.aerogel.com/ resources/commo n / u se rf i I es/f i I e/ D a ta o/o 2 0 S h e ets/ S p a ce I oft - Eu rooea n-Datasheet- EN. odf. SGOPE Acceptable insulation materials need to achieve as low thermal conductivity as possible, enabling a high thermal resistance as well as a low thermal transmittance. The scope of this project is mainly focused on evaluating the ability of the Aerogel blanketsto save energy through a comprehensive study which is broken down as follows: Task 1: Literature Survey Various studies have repofted on the characterization of Aerogel, along withpreliminary investigation of its implementation as a super insulator, (Somana 2012, Huang 20t2, Neugebauer 2004, and New York State of Energy 2013). Task 2: Aerogel Acquisition The team has purchased 800 ft2 of the Aerogel blankets. The commercial product name is Spaceloft. It has a 10mm thickness, and it was delivered as a roll. The team also purchased a Campbell Scientific data logger, thermocouples and two heat flux sensors to collect data from walls insulated by the Aerogel with other needed supplies. Task 3: Field Data Collection Dr. Ibrahim and his team has started field data collection. Thirty thermocouple sensors have been placed in one room of the apartment. Sensors have been mounted on all walls in the room to record data with existing insulation and with Aerogel. Figure 1 shows the thermocouples attached to two walls of the room, while Figure 2 shows Temperature vs. time for the south wall (without Aerogel). The Team built a cubical frame with all walls made from a pure &}|'U6, Aerogel. The temperatures at multiple locations across the box were measured andwill be used to verify the computer simulations. Task 4: Modeling and Simulation Dr. Tao Xing, his Postdoctoral Fellow Dr. Rabijit Dutta, and his graduate student are using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate a square box built using the Aerogel and are using EnergyPlus to simulate the apartment under test. The purpose of using CFD is to determine the heat conductivity of the Aerogel by comparing the predicted inner wall temperature with the measurements. Figure 3 shows the preliminary comparison. Ongoing work includes trying different mesh resolutions, boundary conditions, and wall models. Once heat conductivity of the Aerogelis determined, the value will be used for apartment simulations using EnergyPlus. Figure l: Interior view of apartment with thermocouples This task will be performed after task 4. [enr[)erattire \ri 1 rnre I f,E ilmm ,o(It((r 'lml{ 80 70 50 Figure 3: Comparison between the predicted inner wall temperature using CFD and experimental measurements for a square Aerogel box. DELIVERABLES The main deliverable of this project will be a final report includes: 1. All the needed information regarding the field data collection and the computer simulations, and the exact thermal conductivity of the Aerogel blankets.2. Cost analysis to compare the existing cost of the current insulation material(s) with the anticipated cost of the walls insulated with the Aerogel. PROJECT TEAM SGHEDULE -* so c'tE40acE30 m 10 -s-I+s-5 -s-2*s.7 -s.:,.-Ccffrllmp +Orrtidrl@p o o 5oo lq)o ,.u.*, zqx, 2soo 3.*x, Tire {*conds) Figure 2: Temperature versus time for the south wall The team is currently working on the Analysisof the collected data and how that will be used in the generation of results using the computer simulation. Task 5: Cost Analysis This task will be performed after task 4. Task 6: Environmental lmpact The informalion contained in lhis document is proprietary and confidential PRTNCTPAL TNVESTTGATOR(S) Name Ahmed Ibrahim Orqanization University of Idaho-Civil Enqineerinq Contact #208 885 1328 Email aibra h im@u idaho. edu Name Tao Xino Oroanization University of Idaho-Mechanical Enqineerinq Contact #208 885 9032 Email Xino(ouidaho.edu Name Brian Johnson Orqanization Universitv of Idaho-Electrical Enqineerinq Contact #208 885 5902 Email biohnson @uidaho.edu RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Name Moammed Mudaoio Oroanization University of Idaho-Civil Enqineerinq Email muda6801 @vandals.uidaho.edu Name Shimul Hazra Orqanization University of Idaho-Mechanical Enqineerinq Email hazr0186@vandals.uidaho.edu TASK TIME ALLOCATED START DATE FINISH DATE {Task 1: Literature review){5 Months}{8/2077}{t/20L8} {Task 2: Material purchasinq){2 Months}{7o/2oL7){L2/2077} {Task 3: Field Data Collection){3 Months}{1/2018}{3/20 18} {Task 4: Simulation {5 Months}{9t2017){4t20ta) {Task 5: Cost Analysis){2 Months}{4/2077}t6120 18) {Task 6: Enviro ImDact){2 Months}{6/2017}{8/2018} at ll I I 1t - ^yar rtsrfi. ! tfrr iJ-r !r ti p Ia The infr confidenti;