Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20040622Parker Direct.pdft.,/f""tL,Vt. ILED "jiLm 111M" p~~ ' ' t ~.. ..i,i\;i.t '-"~ 'j~ (,., Ii - I (=-1 ~ " c" " , i ! T ! ~ ..;- ! ;: J o ;A \ ;J (' , 'Jj !,.. IIILd LUiiidJ.)fOd BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTiliTIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF A VISTA CORPORATION FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS SERVICE TO ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS CUSTOMERS IN THE STATE OF IDAHO. ) CASE NO. AVU-O4-) AVU-O4- DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARilYN PARKER IDAHO PUBLIC UTiliTIES COMMISSION JUNE 21 , 2004 Please state your name and address for the record. My name is Marilyn Parker.My business address is 472 West Washington Street, Boise, Idaho. By whom are you employed and in what capacity? I am employed by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission as a Utilities Compliance Investigator. accepted that position with the Consumer Assistance Staff in November 2002. What is your educational and professional background? Prior to my employment wi th the Idaho Public Utilities Commission , I had twenty years experience working in private industry for three different utili ty compani e s In 1973 and 1974 , I was employed by Central Alaska Utilities, a water company in Anchorage, Alaska, as the Executive Secretary to the President of the company. From 1982 until 1987 , I was employed as a Customer Service Representative for Idaho Power Company in Salmon , Idaho. From February 1989 until November 2002, I was employed by Intermountain Gas Company in Customer Services.During my last six years at Intermountain Gas, I supervised representatives at the Customer Service Center s Emergency Answering Service. I received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in CASE NO. AVU-04-1/AVU-04-06/21/04 (Di)PARKER, M. STAFF , 19 Management and Organizational Leadership from George Fox University in Boise, Idaho in June of 2002. In June 2003, I attended the National Low Income Energy Consortium Annual Conference in Sacramento California. Have you previously testified before the Commission? Yes, I have. What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding? I will address issues related to: 1) customer comments received by the Commission regarding this case; 2) proposed charges and rates; 3) Staff's proposed tariff revisions; 4) low-income issues , payment options, and special needs customers; 5) Company operations with regard to customer service; 6) customer relations, and 7) out-of- cycle meter readings. Please summarize Staff's recommendations to the Commission as discussed in your testimony. Staff recommends that the Company be commended for its Customer Assistance Referral Program (CARES) and its ~We Personally Care program. Staff also recommends that: 1 )the Company s proposed charges for reconnection of seasonal gas customers CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 (Di)PARKER, M. STAFF 2 ) 3 ) 4 ) 5 ) 6 ) CUSTOMER COMMENT and after hours connection charges for both gas and electric customers be approved. the provision in the tariffs that allows an additional $4.00 charge to connect a second meter at the same location be el imina ted. the Company resolve its computer programming limitation issues whereby a customer currently cannot receive the benefits of the Winter Payment Plan the customer has declared eligibility for the Moratorium. the Company improve communication with customers about the Winter Payment Plan and the Moratorium. the Company answer 80% of calls within seconds by January of 2005. the Company significantly reduce the number of abandoned calls per month. Have you reviewed the written customer comments that have been received by the Commission regarding this case? Yes.As of June 18, 2004 the Commission had CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 PARKER, STAFF (Di) received comments well peti tions from the Sil ver Valley area with more than 500 signatures. the comments,were from school districts,7. we from business customers, wi th the remainder coming from residential customers.All those commenting, as well as those that signed the peti tions, opposed any rate lncreases. What are the concerns mentioned by customers? The majority of those commenting (58%) said that the economy in northern Idaho should be considered before granting the Company any rate lncreases.The other primary lssues commenters wanted the Commission to consider were: the negative impacts higher rates have on fixed income individuals, senior ci tizens, and low income customers; the concern that the Company may not have done all it could to promote efficiencies from within, thereby eliminating the need for a rate increase; and opposition to an increase in the fixed monthly residential customer charge. What are the economlC condi tions in northern Idaho and how does northern Idaho compare to other areas of the State? In reviewing recent data from the Uni ted States Census Bureau, some counties served by Avista in northern Idaho are clearly experiencing economic distress. CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 (Di)PARKER, M. STAFF However , the counties in northern Idaho cannot be singled out as the only area of the state with poor economic condi tions.Several counties wi thin the state suffer from the same slow growth, high poverty rates, high unemployment, and low wages. As a whole, northern Idaho has a higher number of individual s over the age of 65 (14. 8 %) compared to the state average of 11.3%.Some northern Idaho counties have near 1 y 20% of the popul at ion over 65 years of age.This fact probably accounts for the number of comments from Avista customers on fixed incomes concerned about being able to afford higher utility rates.Staff Exhibit No. 149 compares some of the economic indicators for northern Idaho counties with state average percentages. PROPOSED CHARGES AND RATES Many comments to the Commission in this rate case convey customers ' opposi tion to the proposed increase in the fixed monthly residential customer charge to $5. for both gas and electric service.What is the primary reason customers ci ted for opposing increased customer charges? About one-third of those commenting stated opposition to increases in fixed residential customer charge s Customers are generally against these types of charges because the perception is they have no control CASE NO. AVU-04-1/AVU-04-06/21/04 (Di)PARKER, STAFF over them by ralslng or lowering the thermostat.One customer from Mullen , Idaho wrote in his comments that he felt basic customer charges should be abolished al together. Does Staff support the Company s proposal to ralse the gas customer charge to $5.00 from $3.28 and the electric customer charge to $5.00 from $4.00? Uniform customer charges are certainly eaSler for customers to understand and for the Company to administer.A customer with both gas and electric serVlce sees both customer charges itemized on one bill.It is difficul t to explain to customers why the two customer charges vary, especially when purported to recover the same basic costs for meter reading and billing.Al t houg h Staff supports uniform customer charges, Staff does not support the Company s proposed increase to $ 5. 00.Staff wi tness Schunke has addressed the Staff recommendation for specific customer charges in his testimony. Does Staff support the Company s proposed changes for the cost of seasonal reconnect fees for gas customers? The Company has proposed to lower itsYes. seasonal reconnect fee to $24.00 from $31.00 provided satisfactory arrangements for payment of all proper charges have been made during the hours of 8: 00 a. CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04- 06/21/04 (Di)PARKER, STAFF through 4: 00 p. m. Monday through Friday, except hol idays They have also proposed to increase the charge for a seasonal reconnect from $46 to $48 after hours (4: 00 p. through 7: 00 p. m. Monday through Friday, except hol idays) Staff supports both changes because it aligns the fees for gas charges wi th the electric charges for the same servlce. What changes have been proposed to the Company s charges for new customer connections? Avista proposes to increase its gas and electric charges for connecting new customers after hours to $48 from $32.Staff supports these changes.Avista is attempting to keep charges in line with the costs to provide the serVlce. Are Avista ' s proposed reconnect ion fees and after hours connection charges reasonable and comparable with other Idaho utilities? Staff Exhibit No. 150 provides aYes. comparison of Idaho regulated energy company reconnection fees and service establishment fees.In Staff's oplnlon Avista s proposed charges are not out of line. STAFF'S PROPOSED TARIFF REVI S IONS In your review of Avista s tariffs, did you find any areas of concern? Of concern to Staff is the provision inYes. CASE NO. AVU-04-1/AVU-04-06/21/04 (Di)PARKER , M. STAFF Avista s tariffs that allows for an additional $4. charge for each additional service being reconnected the same time at a premise.Staff proposes that references to this charge be eliminated from Electric Tariff No. 28, Sheet 70-, Rule 14.3, and Gas Tariff , No. 27 , Sheet 170-, Rule 15. Avista s usual practice is to disconnect only the electric service of a customer wi th both electric and gas service.As a resul t, the Company rarely needs to reconnect more than one meter at a premise, and the Company-seldom bills an additional $4.00.If this provlslon were eliminated, the revenue impact would be negligible.Avista collected a total of $96.00 from customers in 2003 for reconnecting additional meters. Staff questions whether this charge is necessary if it is rarely assessed, produces little revenue, and is not designed to influence customers ' behavior. LOW INCOME ISSUES, PAYMENT OPTIONS, AND SPECIAL NEEDS CUSTOMERS Does Staff believe Avista is doing an adequate job of supporting community-based agencies with funds for the purpose of helping low income customers meet energy needs? In the past four years, AvistaYes. shareholders have given 515, 000 to proj ect Share, all of CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-04- 06/21/04 (Di)PARKER, M. STAFF which went back to northern Idaho residents for the purpose of helping low income individuals meet energy needs.Since proj ect Share is a fuel-blind fund, some monies went to other energy sources such as wood, propane, or oil; but, since the year 2000, Avista customers have received $563,340 from Project Share.In the past four heating seasons, 2,574 Avista customers have received an average of $217 from Project Share to help with heating costs. What options do Avista customers have if they are not able to pay their bills in full? Avista customers can make payment arrangements by placing a call to the Company and asking for an extension on a bill's due date or asking to set up a mutually satisfactory payment plan.Avista also offers a program called ~Comfort Level Billing U that allows customers to pay an average amount which is determined by dividing the customer s proj ected yearly energy billings by twelve months.These estimated average amounts are reviewed every three months by Avista to determine if the amount the customer was asked to pay each month has kept in ine wi th the proj ected usage.This proactive procedure to review the Comfort Level Billing amount every three months minimizes any surprises to customers that can resul t from a miscalculated monthly average. CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04- 06/21/04 (Di)PARKER, M. STAFF Customer service representatives are also trained to determine if a customer might qualify to receive help from the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)During the heating season of 2002-2003 Avista s Idaho customers received a total of $1,134,611. Another program that can benefit some low- lncome customers during the winter months is the Winter Payment Plan.During the months of December , January and February, customers who declare that they are unable to pay their Avista utility bills in full and also have children, elderly, or infirm in the household are exempt from disconnection for nonpayment.When a customer makes the declaration of his or her inability to pay the bill in full, the utility is required to offer the Winter Payment Plan to the customer.I f the customer agrees to participate in the Winter Payment Plan , the protection from disconnection is extended to the shoulder months of November and March.Customers who agree to participate in the Winter Payment Plan must pay by the due date each month an amount equal to one-half of what the customer Comfort Level Billing would be. Avista takes a customer s inability to pay one step further wi th its Customer Assistance Referral and Evaluation Service (CARES) program.The CARES program discussed in greater length below. CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 PARKER , M. STAFF (Di) 10 Does Avista offer the Winter Payment Plan to customers as required by the Utility Customer Relations Rule 306.03? Staff was concerned that no Avista customers in Idaho participated in the Winter Payment Plan during the last two heating seasons.One of the reasons may be due to the Company not making available to its customers any written material regarding protection from disconnection during the winter months if there are children , infirm , or elderly in the household and the customer declares that he or she cannot pay the bill in full.The Company stated that customer serVlce representatives are expected to apprise customers of the program s availabili ty if the representative determines the customer is eligible.CARES representatives work closely with agencies to help identify those who are eligible. An addi tional problem is caused by the fact that Avista has a computer programming limitation that prohibi ts a customer from being placed on the Winter Payment Plan and receive Moratorium protection from disconnection simul taneously.The Company prefers to classify an eligible customer as being a Moratorium participant as opposed to placing the customer on the Winter Payment Plan because the Moratorium classification CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 PARKER , M. STAFF (Di) 11 takes the customer out of the normal credit and collection work cycle and avoids the possibility that the customer would be inadvertently turned off for nonpayment during the winter months. It is Staff's position that Avista needs to resolve its computer programming problem so that customers can have the opportuni ty to participate in the Winter Payment Plan while simul taneously receiving protection from disconnection afforded by declaring eligibility for the Moratorium.This will also allow the Company to be in compliance with the Utility Customer Relations Rules (UCRR) regarding both the Moratorium and Winter Payment Plan. In June of this year , a task force comprised of representatives from Avista, Idaho Power Company, Intermountain Gas Company, Utah Power, the IPUC, Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho (CAPAI) , Salvation Army, and Idaho Community Action Network (ICAN), met to determine the best practices for informing customers about the Moratorium and the Winter Payment Plan.Before this comlng heating season begins, the task force intends to have a preferred methodology in place concerning how utilities communicate with customers regarding the Winter Payment Plan and the Moratorium. Does Avista provide any addi tional serVlces CASE NO. AVU-04-1/AVU-04- 06/21/04 PARKER, M. STAFF (Di) 12 for customers that have special needs, such as, but not limited to, those with severe disabilities or diminished mental capacity? Avista has a program entitled ~Customer Assistance Referral and Evaluation Service u (CARES)For Idaho customers, Avista employees two specially trained customer service representatives, called CARES representatives.These representatives specialize in helping customers who are facing hardships obtain access to a wide variety of programs, including special payments arrangements, and referral to agencies for the purpose of assisting wi th more than energy bills. CARES representatives in Idaho recently organized an effort to collect personal care items for low- income customers.Personal care items include items that cannot be purchased wi th food stamps such as shampoo, soap, toiletries, and/or paper products.Avista s program is called ~We Personally Care. Last year , the Avista CARES representatives not only organized the drive to collect the personal care items, they al so located churches and other facilities such as the local Community Action Agencies to store and assist in the distribution of the collected items.More than 6, 000 pounds of personal care items were collected and distributed last year. Avista s worthwhile effort to reach out into the community CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 PARKER, M. STAFF (Di) 13 deserves high marks for exceptional communi ty serVlce. Avista Utilities also offers free consumer credi t counsel ing through a partnership wi th Consumer Credi t Counseling Service of the Inland Empire. COMPANY OPERATIONS WITH REGARD TO CUSTOMER SERVICE How does Avista compare to other energy companles regarding its abili ty to answer incoming customer service calls in a timely manner? According to the Edison Electric Institute/American Gas Association (EEI/AGA) in its 2002 annual data source survey, the average service level (the percentage of calls answered within a defined number of seconds) among the 62 reporting utility companies was 73 .8% of calls answered in 32.3 seconds.Avista recently set its internal service level goal at answering 70% of incoming customer calls within 60 seconds, somewhat lower than the average service levels reported by the companies In the EEI/AGA survey. In the past four years, has the Company met its goal? In 2003, there were only three months in which the Company was able to meet its goal.In 2002, the Company met its goal in nlne of the twelve months, and in 2001 , the Company was abl e to meet its goal in three of the months.The Company met its goal every month in 2000. CASE NO. AVU-04-1/AVU-04-06/21/04 (Di) 14PARKER, M. STAFF Is Avista s serVlce level acceptable to Staff? The fact that the Company has been unableNo. to consistently meet its own lowered service level goal, especially in recent months, is of concern to Staff. Why did the Company choose to lower its service level from 80% of calls answered within 20 seconds to answering 70% of calls wi thin one minute? The Company s customer service managers stated that this lowered goal is not a permanent service level goal.The plan is to return to a more desirable serVlce level as soon as the full complement of Customer Service Representatives (CSRs) lS reached.One of the primary reasons to temporarily change the service level standard a few years ago was to raise employee morale wi thin the call center.Before the change, managers saw CSRs leaving the end of their shifts exhausted and frustrated because they were not able to meet expected goal s .Managers al so were concerned that providing good customer serVlce was In jeopardy.That is because CSRs sometimes cut calls short in an effort to process as many phone calls per day as possible.By slightly lowering the standard, the CSRs were glven permission to concentrate on the quality of the phone call rather than just the quanti ty of phone calls answered per day. Company call center managers state they are CASE NO. AVU-04-1/AVU-04- 06/21/04 (Di) 15PARKER, M. STAFF still recovering from staffing issues related to past financial constraints.They were unable to say specifically when service levels would be raised to higher levels. Does Staff believe that Avista s step to improve employee morale in the Call Center had an effect on the customer service provided to customers? Staff's opinion is that customer service was, in fact, compromi sed.This is evident in the number of calls that were abandoned in the past few years.In 2003, the average number of abandoned calls per month was 3,292; in 2002, an average of 2 , 998 call s were abandoned; in 2001, the number was 3,243; and in 2000, the average number of calls abandoned was 2 148 per month.(Abandone d telephone calls are the number of customers that reach the Company, wait on hold, and then hang up before speaking to a live representative) The Company posted its worst year for service levels in 2003 with an average of answering only 62% of its calls wi thin one minute.Because Avista call center operates in a virtual environment , the numbers of abandoned calls cannot be isolated to identify the number of calls abandoned specifically by Idaho customers. The numbers cited above include abandoned calls from Avista s four call centers located in Idaho, Washington Oregon, and California. CASE NO. AVU-04-1/AVU-04-06/21/04 PARKER, M. STAFF (Di) 16 The Company s overall abandoned call rate points to an imbalance between customer accessibility and Company responsl veness.When the Company is able to decrease its customers ' waiting-on-hold times, the number of abandoned call s wi 11 decrease. Regarding the Company s accessibili ty, did Staff find any other areas of concern? UCRR 304.02 requlres utilities toYes. diligently attempt to contact a customer in jeopardy of losing service due to nonpayment at least 24 hours before the proposed action.Avista s current practice is to provide a recorded message to meet this requirement.If a live person answers the telephone, a recorded message left with whoever answers the telephone. Of particular concern to Staff is that a customer on the cusp of being disconnected may actually answer the telephone only to hear a recorded message telling him or her to ~call the Company for an important mes sage. "If the customer attempts to call back to the Company he or she , in all likelihood, would be placed in the telephone queue awaiting the next available representati ve.This practice compounds the Company problems with respect to service levels and abandoned calls by directing calls into the Call Center.It also represents a missed opportunity to negotiate a payment CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 PARKER , M. STAFF (Di) 17 arrangement with the customer. Staff does not believe this practice complies wi th the spiri t of the rule.However , the Best Practices Task Force plans to address the issue soon of how to improve the disconnection notification process.Both Avista and Staff will be participating in the discussions. Does Staff have any recommendations regarding Avista levels goals?serVlce Yes.Staff suggests that Avista return goal answerlng 80%call s wi thin seconds by January 2005.interlm step,Avista can aim to meet or exceed its current service level goal of answerlng 70% of calls within one minute.Staff also recommends that the Company significantly reduce the number of abandoned calls per month. CUSTOMER RELATIONS Please describe how many and what type of complaints and inquiries the Commission has received regarding Avista. The Commission received more complaints and inquiries in 2001 and 2002 than in 2000 and 2003.Higher rates no doubt contributed to the increase in the number of complaints during 2001 and 2002.During each of the last four years, complaints fell into three maln categories: credi t and collections, billing, and rates and CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 PARKER, STAFF (Di) 18 policies.Staff Exhibit No. 151 provides a breakdown of the individual complaint and inquiry categories for each of the past four years. What did your analysis reveal regarding complaints and inquiries received by the Commission in 2003? The majority fell within the category of credit and collections.Of the total number of complaints and inquiries in 2003, 65% concerned credit and collection lssues.Most of those were regarding a threat of or actual disconnection of service due to nonpayment of an account, a clear indication that some customers continue to have difficul ty paying their energy bills. How does Avista compare wi th other maJ or Idaho energy companles wi th regard to the number of complaints and inquiries to the Commission? In three of the last four years, Avista had fewer complaints and inquiries per 1 000 customers than Idaho Power Company.In each of the last four years, Avista had more complaints and inquiries per 1 000 customers than Intermountain Gas Company or Utah Power. The number of complaints and inquiries per 1 000 Avista customers in 2003 was 1.These numbers are not indicative of a particular problem with Avista s customer relations; however , they do reveal an obvious correlation CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 PARKER, STAFF (Di) 19 between higher rates and customers ' inabili ty to pay bills in full.Staff Exhibi t No. 152 shows in graph form how Avista s number of complaints and inquiries per 1,000 customers compares to other maj or Idaho regulated energy companles. Is Avista responslve to the Commission Utility Compliance Investigators during complaint investigations? Yes, Company representatives are responsive to lssues raised by customers and Staff and they respond in a timely manner.The average length of time in which Staff was able to resolve Avista s complaints in 2003 was 3. business days for electric related complaints and 3.38 for natural gas related complaints.The average length of time among all Idaho regulated electric customers was 3. days and 2.81 for natural gas customers. What observations do you have about the Company s Website? Many functions are available on Avista customer- friendly Websi te.Customers can sign up for service, disconnect service, or transfer service using the Company s Websi te.Bills can be received and paid online. Currently, Avista does not have the abili ty for customers to make payment arrangements online; however , this feature is on Avista s project list although no definite date for CASE NO. AVU-04-1/AVU-04-06/21/04 PARKER, M. STAFF (Di) 20 implementation has been determined. How many Avista customers in Idaho recel ve their bills online? Nearly 3,000 Idaho customers have signed up to receive their bills online, saving the Company printing and postage costs. Do you believe Avista provides adequate customer serVlce for non-English speaking customers? The Company has indicated to Staff thatYes. it usually has one Spanish-speaking representative on shift during weekday business hours.They also offer a translation service through a contracted service called Language Line that is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.At this time, the low number of Hispanic and non- English speaking residents in the Idaho counties served by Avista does not justify requiring the Company to provide bills, notices, and/or brochures in any languages other than English.It is not clear how customers in need of translation services are made aware of the availability of the Language Line service since those in need do not speak or read English.However , the question of how best to meet the needs of non-English speaking customers will be addressed by the recently formed Best Practices Task Force.As mentioned previously, both Avista and the Staff are members of the task force. CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04- 06/21/04 PARKER, STAFF (Di) 21 Did you reVlew the Company s bills, notices forms, and other document s to ascertain compl iance wi the Utility Customer Relations Rules (UCRR)? Staff suggested many changes be made toYes. Avista s Rules Summary as required by Rule 701.In a meeting held in June of this year, Avista and other regulated energy companies asked Staff to develop a model Rules Summary that could be used as a guideline by the companies.Consumer Staff is currently working on a model Rules Summary that should be completed and available by August 2004. Staff also reviewed the Company s bills, notices, and forms and identified ones that were not in compl iance wi th the UCRR.The areas of non-compliance were discussed wi th Avista and the Company agreed to revise the non-compliant forms.The Company wi 11 provide coples to Staff for review prior to final printing of the revised forms. OUT-OF-CYCLE METER READINGS In your review of Company procedures regarding out-of-cycle meter reading and billing, did you find anything of concern? Yes. Avista does not physically disconnect service after a customer moves and discontinues service. Unless another customer moves in immediately after the CASE NO. AVU-04-1/AVU-04-06/21/04 PARKER , M. STAFF (Di) 22 former customer discontinues serVlce, this resul ts in unbilled usage not attributable to any customer.The Company has also established a policy of not routinely reading meters outside of regular monthly meter reading cycles.A customer who establishes or discontinues serVlce on a date that does not coincide wi th the Company s regularly scheduled meter reading will receive a bill based on estimated rather than actual usage. Property owners who have landlord-tenant agreements with Avista and customers who move or discontinue service seasonally are affected by this policy.Staff's primary concern lS that these customers are not receiving accurate bills based on their actual usage. Is the Staff prepared to recommend a solution to this perceived problem? Not at this time.Due to time constraints, Staff has been unable to complete its investigation or explore solutions with the Company.Staff intends to pursue this matter informally and, if necessary, ask the Commission to address the issue formally in a separate proceeding at a later date. Does this conclude your direct testimony? Yes it does. CASE NO. AVU-E- 04 -1/AVU-G- 04-06/21/04 PARKER , M. STAFF (Di) 23 EC O N O M I C I N D I C A T O R S NO R T H E R N I D A H O Co u n t y & Po p u l a t i o n G r o w t h 9 0 - Po v e r t y R a t e 1 9 9 9 Un e m p l o y m e n t R a t e , A p r i l 2 0 0 3 Av e r a g e A n n u a l W a g e 2 0 0 2 Pe r s o n s O v e r 6 5 Y r s . Co . S e a t Co u n t y St a t e Co u n t y St a t e Co u n t y Id a h o Co u n t y St a t e Co u n t y St a t e Be n e w a h 15 . 50 % 28 . 50 % 14 . 10 % 12 . 00 % 10 . 10 % 60 % 00 % $2 6 11 6 $2 7 66 5 14 . 20 % 11 . 30 % St M a r i e s Bo n n e r 38 . 4 0 % 28 . 50 % 15 . 50 % 12 . 00 % 00 % 60 % 00 % $2 3 90 9 $2 7 66 5 13 . 10 % 11 . 30 % Sa n d p o i n t Bo u n d a r y 18 . 50 % 28 . 50 % 15 . 70 % 12 . 00 % 60 % 60 % 00 % $2 4 05 1 $2 7 66 5 13 . 4 0 % 11 . 30 % Bo n n e r s F Cl e a r w a t e r 00 % 28 . 50 % 13 . 50 % 12 . 00 % 10 . 20 % 60 % 00 % $2 4 38 5 $2 7 66 5 15 . 60 % 11 . 30 % Or o f i n o Id a h o 12 . 70 % 28 . 50 % 16 . 30 % 12 . 00 % 8. 4 0 % 60 % 00 % $2 2 95 7 $2 7 66 5 17 . 00 % 11 . 30 % Gr a n g e v l l e Ko o t e n a i 55 . 70 % 28 . 50 % 10 . 50 % 12 . 00 % 20 % 60 % 00 % $2 5 10 5 $2 7 66 5 12 . 30 % 11 . 30 % Co e u r d A La t a h 14 . 10 % 28 . 50 % 16 . 70 % 12 . 00 % 90 % 60 % 00 % $2 2 67 7 $2 7 66 5 50 % 11 . 30 % Mo s c o w Le w i s 60 % 28 . 50 % 12 . 00 % 12 . 00 % 50 % 60 % 00 % $1 9 91 3 $2 7 66 5 18 . 50 % 11 . 30 % Ne z P e r c e Ne z P e r c e 10 . 80 % 28 . 50 % 12 . 20 % 12 . 00 % 3. 4 0 % 60 % 00 % $2 8 15 9 $2 7 66 5 16 . 50 % 11 . 30 % Le w i s t o n Sh o s h o n e 1 . 1 28 . 50 % 16 . 4 0 % 12 . 00 % 10 . 60 % 60 % 00 % $2 3 67 1 $2 7 66 5 17 . 4 0 % 11 . 30 % Wa l l a c e Av e r a g e 17 . 62 % 28 . 50 % 14 . 29 % 12 . 00 % 09 % 60 % 00 % $2 4 09 4 $2 7 , 66 5 14 . 75 % 11 . 30 % Fr o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s C e n s u s B u r e a u ~ ~ ,. . . . . . . ' " d r: / ) . :: r (' l ) ... . . . . -- - - ~ r: r Z" " ' " ~ ~ .- + - ('l ) . Z ~ ~ ~ ? .-+ - ~~ , . . . . . . . ~ e e ~ I \ 0 C1 tT j ~ ~ ,.. . . . . . COMPARISON OF ENERGY UTILITIES ESTABLISHMENT OF SERVICE CHARGES Atlanta Power $25 (Schedule 4, page 4) Applies to customer establishing service for the first time at a service location Idaho Power $20 for Schedules 1 , 7, 9, 19 24 & 25 (Sheet F-, Rule F; Schedule 66, Sheet 66- Service Establishment Charge" applies to customer establishing service at a location where service is currently energized; charge does not apply to rental property covered by a continuous service agreement or non-metered service, e., street lighting; see list of Reconnection Charges for charges applicable to customer establishing service at a location where service is not currently energized Intermountain Gas $14 during normal business hours; $40 all other times (Sheet 5, Section A, 9. Account Initiation Fee" applies to each new account opened; does not apply to rental property covered by a continuous service agreement or new building or equipment turn on and safety inspections Utah PowerlPacifiCorp $50 from 4 to 7 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays; $50 from 8 a.m. to 4 p. weekends or holidays (Sheets 300.1 & 3R. Service Connection Charge" applies to each new account opened; there is no charge during normal office hours, 8 a.m. to 4 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays Avista $32 after normal business hours (Electric Tariff Sheet 70-, Rule 6.1; Gas Tariff Sheet 170-, Rule 6.1) N ew Customer Turn-On Charge" applies to new gas or electric customer service connection; there is no charge for establishing service during normal business hours; if gas and electric service connections are performed at same time, only one $32 charge applies Exhibit No. 150 Case No. A VU-04- A VU -04- M. Parker, Staff 6/21/04 Page 1 of 4 COMPARISON OF ENERGY UTILITIES RECONNECTION CHARGES Voluntary or Seasonal Disconnection Atlanta Power Same as reconnection fees for involuntary disconnections Idaho Power Same as Service Connection Charge (service not currently energized) Intermountain Gas Same as reconnection fees for involuntary disconnections Utah Power/PacifiCorp Same as reconnection fees for involuntary disconnections Avista For gas service $31 from 8 a.m. to 4 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays $46 from 4 p.m. to 7 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays $46 weekend or holidays $4 for each additional meter (Sheet 170-, Rules 15.2 & 15. F or electric service $24 from 8 a.m. to 4 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays $48 from 4 to 7 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays $48 weekend or holidays $4 for each additional meter (Sheet 70-, Rules 14.2 & 14. Gas Service Reestablishment Charge" and "Electric Reestablishment Charge" apply if service is reestablished after voluntary or seasonal disconnection; if arrangements for reconnection made during hours of 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. weekdays, excluding holidays reconnect will be done the same day; if arrangements made on holidays, weekends, or hours between 7 p.m. and 8 a.m. weekdays, company will reconnect the following day except in the case of medical emergencies and disconnect in error, which will be done the same day If gas and/or electric service reestablished within 12 months of the date of voluntary or seasonal disconnection, customer must also pay monthly minimums for months during which service was disconnected Exhibit No. 150 Case No. A VU-04- A VU -04- M. Parker, Staff 6/21/04 Page 2 of 4 COMPARISON OF ENERGY UTILITIES RECONNECTION CHARGES Involuntary Disconnection Atlanta Power $25 for customers disconnected for a period of 30 days or less; $200 for customers disconnected for more than 30 days (Schedule 4, page 4) Idaho Power Schedule 1. 7 & 9 Connect/reconnect on weekdays $20 for customer request from 7 :30 a.m. to 6 p. $45 for customer request from 6:01 p.m. to 9 p. $80 for customer request from 9:01p.m. to 7 :29 a. Connect/reconnect on weekends & holidays $45 for customer request from 7:30 a.m to 9:00 p. $80 for customer request from 9:01 p.m. to 7:29 a. Schedule 15. 19.24. 25.40.41 & 42 Connect/reconnect on weekdays $40 for customer request from 7:30 a.m. to 6 p. $65 for customer request from 6:01 p.m. to 9 p. $100 for customer request from 9:01 p.m. to 7:29 a. Connect/reconnect on weekends & holidays $65 for customer request from 7:30 a.m to 9:00 p. $100 for customer request from 9:01 p.m. to 7:29 a. (Sheet F-, Rules F; Schedule 66, Sheet 66- Service Connection Charge" applies to customers who are establishing service or requesting reconnection of service at a premise where service is not currently energized Intermountain Gas $20 for reconnections performed during normal business hours (8 a.- 5:00 p. Monday- Friday, except holidays); $40 all other times (Sheet 5 , Section A, 9.4) Reconnection Charge" applies to reconnection performed after customer is disconnected involuntarily (See next page for more information) Exhibit No. 150 Case No. A VU-04- A VU-04- M. Parker, Staff 6/21/04 Page 3 of 4 Utah PowerlPacifiCorp $25 during hours of 8 a.m. to 4 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays $50 from 4 to 7 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays $50 from 8 a.m. to 4 p., weekends or holidays (Sheets 10R., 10R.8 & 300. Reconnection Charge" applies to reconnection performed after customer is discon- nected involuntarily; if arrangements or payment made during hours of 8 a.m. to 7 p. weekdays, excluding holidays, or 8 a.m. to 4 p., weekends and holidays, reconnect will be done the same day; if arrangements made at other times, company will reconnect the following day, except in the case of medical emergencies and disconnect in error which will be done the same day A vista Gas & electric service $24 during hours of 8 a.m. to 4 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays $48 from 4 to 7 p., Monday-Friday, except holidays $48 weekends or holidays $4 for each additional service connection made at same time (Gas Tariff Sheet 170-G.1 , Rules 15.1 & 15.3; Electric Tariff Sheet 70-, Rules 14.1 & 14. Reconnection Charge" applies to reconnection performed after customer is discon- nected involuntarily; if arrangements or payment made during hours of 8 a.m. to 7 p. weekdays, excluding holidays, reconnect will be done the same day; if arrangements made on holidays, weekends, or hours between 7 p.m. and 8 a.m. weekdays, company will reconnect the following day except in the case of medical emergencies and dis- connect in error, which will be done the same day Exhibit No. 150 Case No. A VU-04- A VU -04- M. Parker, Staff 6/21/04 Page 4 of 4 AVISTA COMPLAINTS 2000-2003 2000 2001 2002 2003 Gas Electric Gas Electric Gas Electric Gas Electric Credit & Collection 107 131 129 105 Line Extension/Installation Service Outage/Repair Billing Rates & Policies All Other Total 141 201 183 151 AVISTA INQUIRIES 2000-2003 2000 2001 2002 2003 Gas Electric Gas Electric Gas Electric Gas Electric Credit & Collection Line Extension/Installation Service Outage/Repair Billing Rates & Policies All Other Total AVISTA COMPLAINTS & INQUIRIES 2000-2003 2000 2001 2002 2003 Gas Electric Gas Electric Gas Electric Gas Electric Complaints 141 201 183 151 Inquiries Total Contacts 185 236 206 169 Grand Total Gas & Electric 205 266 219 178 Exhibit No. 151 Case No. A VU-O4- A VU -04- M. Parker, Staff 6/21/04 ... C1 ) I . . c. . CI ) en .. . . . . c: .- .! :: s c. . ~~ (j m N. ~ ~ ~ ~ 08 cr " +: : . ' ... . . ~ o .- t - . Z ~ ~ ~ ? .- t - ~~ " " " ~~ ~ ~ C1 +:: . + : : . .. . . . . ~ Co m p l a i n t & I n q u i r y Co m p a r i s o n b y Ut i l i t y o n a P e r 00 0 Cu s t o m e r B a s i s 20 0 0 20 0 1 20 0 2 20 0 3 . A v i s t a 8 I d a h o P o w e r ~ I n t e r m o u n t a i n Ga s m U t a h P o w e r & Li g h t CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2004 SERVED THE FOREGOING DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARILYN PARKER, IN CASE NO. AVU-04-lIAVU-04-, BY MAILING A COpy THEREOF POSTAGE PREP AID TO THE FOLLOWING: DA VID 1. MEYER SR VP AND GENERAL COUNSEL VISTA CORPORATION PO BOX 3727 SPOKANE W A 99220-3727 KELLY NORWOOD VICE PRESIDENT STATE & FED. REG. AVIS T A UTILITIES PO BOX 3727 SPOKANE WA 99220-3727 CONLEY E WARD GIVENS PURSLEY LLP PO BOX 2720 BOISE ID 83701-2720 DENNIS E PESEAU, PH. D. UTILITY RESOURCES INC 1500 LIBERTY ST SE, SUITE 250 SALEM OR 97302 CHARLES L A COX EV ANS KEANE 111 MAIN STREET PO BOX 659 KELLOGG ID 83837 BRAD M PURDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 2019 N 17TH ST BOISE ID 83702 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE