Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201027_mh1.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM 1 DECISION MEMORANDUM TO: COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER RAPER COMMISSIONER ANDERSON COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL FROM: MATT HUNTER DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE: OCTOBER 22, 2020 SUBJECT: IN THE MATTER OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER’S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A CAPACITY DEFICIENCY PERIOD TO BE USED FOR AVOIDED COST CALCULATIONS; CASE NO. PAC-E-20-13 On October 6, 2020, Rocky Mountain Power (“Company”), a division of PacifiCorp, applied for Commission approval of its capacity deficiency period determination for use in avoided cost calculations under the Surrogate Avoided Resource1 (“SAR”) methodology. Application at 1. BACKGROUND Generally, qualifying facilities only receive capacity payments when a utility is capacity deficient. See Order No. 32697 at 52. The Commission has directed each electrical utility to initiate a case, separate from the utility’s Integrated Resource Plan filing with the Commission, to determine the capacity deficiency period to be used in the utility’s SAR methodology. Id. at 23. THE APPLICATION The Company notes that issues arising out of the Company’s 2019 IRP filing precipitated this filing. Application at 4-5. The Company anticipates its capacity deficiency period will begin in July 2029 and explains how this capacity deficiency period was calculated. Id. at 3- 6. The Company asks that the Commission approve the capacity deficiency period. Id. at 6. 1 The SAR methodology is designed to comply with the requirement in 18 C.F.R. § 292.304(c) that published/standard avoided cost rates be established and made available to qualifying facilities with a design capacity of 100 kilowatts or less. The SAR methodology estimates a utility’s avoided costs by calculating the cost of a surrogate avoided resource. The Commission uses a natural gas-fired combined-cycle combustion turbine as the surrogate resource. See Order No. 32697. DECISION MEMORANDUM 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the case be processed under Modified Procedure, with comments due December 22, 2020 and reply comments due January 12, 2021. Additionally, Staff recommends the Commission set a 21-day intervention deadline for persons who wish to intervene as a party in this case. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to: 1. Process this case under Modified Procedure, with comments due December 22, 2020 and reply comments due January 12, 2021? 2. Require persons who wish to intervene in this case to file a Petition to Intervene within 21 days of the issuance of the Commission’s Notice of Application and Modified Procedure in this case? Matt Hunter Deputy Attorney General I:\Legal\ELECTRIC\PAC-E-20-13\memos\PACE2013_mh.docx