20200310_ej1.pdf

DECISION MEMORANDUM
TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER
COMMISSIONER RAPER
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON
COMMISSION SECRETARY
COMMISSION STAFF
LEGAL
FROM:EDWARD JEWELL
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
DATE:MARCH 6,2020
SUBJECT:APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER FOR APPROVAL OF THE
CAPACITY DEFICIENCY TO BE UTILIZED FOR AVOIDED COST
CALCULATIONS;CASE NO.IPC-E-19-20.
On June 28,2019,Idaho Power Company ("Company")filed an Application
requesting the Commission approve a first capacity deficit date of July 2029 to be used in
avoided cost calculations under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 ("PURPA").
On July 19,2019,the Company filed a letter in IPC-E-19-19 stating that it needed
additional time to perform modeling and analysis for its 2019 Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP").
The revised IRP analysis may affect the first capacity deficit date.
On August 13,2019,the Commission issued a Notice of Application,which
referenced the Company's letter,and stated that no further action would be taken on the
Application until the Company submitted its amended 2019 IRP.
On January 31,2020,the Company submitted its amended 2019 IRP.
THE APPLICATION
Under PURPA,the Commission has established a surrogate avoided resource
("SAR")methodology and an Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP")methodology to calculate
avoided cost rates for qualifying facilities ("QFs").Eligibility for SAR or IRP avoided cost rates
is determined by the QF's resource type and project size.Under both methods,a QF receives
capacity payments only after the applicable capacity deficit date is reached.The capacity deficit
date in effect when the QF establishes a legally enforceable obligation with the Company is the
DECISION MEMORANDUM l
applicable capacity deficit date for that QF.The capacity deficit date for both methods is
determined by data and modeling in the Company's IRP.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission dismiss the Company's Application and direct the
Company to refile its Application once its amended 2019 IRP is acknowledged by the
Commission.Staff makes this recommendation based on prior Commission order and because
the supplemental analysis performed for the amended IRP will require an updated capacity
deficiency date analysis.
In its Application,the Company cites Order No.32697,which directed the utilities to
submit a capacity deficiency case when the utility submits its IRP.Upon reviewing the
Application,Staff noticed the Company did not cite Order No.33917 from PAC-E-17-09,which
is applicable to the Company's Application.In that order,the Commission stated,
As to the timing of the Company's and other electric utilities'
capacity deficiency filings,we find it reasonable for the utilities to
postpone such filings until after we have completed our
consideration of the utilities'IRP reports and acknowledged them.
Rocky Mountain did not oppose this change in timing,and it does
not appear to have a negative impact on the utilities or their
planning processes and will ensure improved efficiency and greater
comprehensiveness of Staff's review.We therefore amend Order
No.32697 to direct the utilities to file their first capacity
deficiency cases after the Commission has acknowledged their IRP
reports.
Order No.33917 at 4.The Commission went on to order "that each Idaho electric utility shall
submit its updated capacity deficiency filing after the Commission has acknowledged its IRP
report,rather than upon its IRP filing,thus amending Order No.32697."Id.
In addition to the directives of Order No.33917,Staff believes it is appropriate for
the Commission to dismiss the Company's Application and direct the Company to submit a new
Application once its amended 2019 IRP is acknowledged because doing so would ensure that the
capacity deficiency analysis is based on the best information available.In Staff Comments in
PAC-E-17-09,Staff stated
it would be more efficient to delay each utility's capacity
deficiency filing until after Commission has acknowledged the
utility's IRP,to avoid duplicative efforts by the parties,and to
'ensure that all factors that could affect the first capacity deficiency
DECISION MEMORANDUM 2
date are covered through the comprehensive nature of the IRP
acknowledgment review.'
Order No.33917 at 3.In light of the modeling issues encountered with the 2019 IRP,Staff
believes it is particularly appropriate in this instance to wait until the amended IRP has been
acknowledged before engaging in the capacity deficiency analysis.
In communication with counsel for Idaho Power,the Company indicated it would like
an opportunityto respond to Staff's recommendation.
COMMISSION DECISION
Does the Commission wish to dismiss the Company's Application in this case and
direct the Company to resubmit the Application upon acknowledgement of the Company's
amended 2019 IRP,as required by Order No.33917?Or,
Does the Commission wish to issue a Notice of Modified Procedure and give the
Company,and any interested persons,21 days to comment and 7 days to reply specifically on
whether the capacity deficiency filing should be made at the time the Company files its IRP or at
the time the Company's IRP is acknowledged?
Edward J.J ll
Deputy Atto -General
I\Legal\ELECTRIC\lPC-E 19-20\lPCEI920_decmemo 2_ej
DECISION MEMORANDUM 3