HomeMy WebLinkAboutwater.pdf
-
Idaho Water Utilities
The Idaho Public Utilities Commission regulates 27 privately operated water companies varying
from United Water Idaho with more than 70,000 customers to utilities serving a few homes in residential
subdivisions or mobile home parks. Regulated companies comprise less than 1 percent of about 2,600
systems that supply drinking water to Idahoans. Most of the unregulated systems belong to and are run
without profit by homeowners’ associations. Many others are municipal systems operated by local
governments.
The rates listed are strictly representative of residential customers and may not reflect actual rates paid by a
specific customer. (nm) means non-metered, (m) is metered.
Date
Name No. of Hook-up Mo. Residential Rates1 Rates Last
of Utility CustomersFee (unless otherwise noted) Revised
Bar Circle “S” 129 $750 $15/0-7,500 gallons 02/01/90
Water Inc. 95 cents/1,000 gals. over 7,500
Bitterroot 117 $750 $20/0-15,000 gallons 08/23/03
Water Co. 75 cents/1,000 gals. over 15,000
Brian Water Co. 46 $10.50/0-4,000 gallons 05/01/99
$1.08/1,000 gals. over 4,000
Capitol Water 2,863 $12.92/mo Oct-April (nm) 01/01/04
$24.32/mo May-Sept (nm)
Country Club 129 $500 $17/0-30,000 gallons 07/01/05
Hills Utilities 60 cents/1,000 gals. over 30,000
Eagle Water 2,889 $845 $7.84/0-600 cf. 03/25/87
Co., Inc. 45 cents/100 cf. over 600 cf.
Evergreen 33 $600 $15/0-7,500 gallons 11/10/87
Water Co. $0.35/1,000 gals. over 7,500
Falls Water 2,688 $500 $11.50/0-20,000 gallons 12/15/03
Co., Inc. 41 cents/1,000 gals. over 20,000
Algoma Water 25 $17.59/mo. 05/06/02
Grouse Point
Water Co. 23 $22/0-8,000 gallons 09/01/99 50 cents/1,000gals over 8,000
Diamond Bar
Estates 72 $21.00 first 7,500 gallons 07/30/04
45 cents per 1,000 gallons over 7,500
--PAGE 33--
Name No. of Hook-up Mo. Residential Rates1 Rates Last
of Utility CustomersFee (unless otherwise noted) Revised
Aspen Creek Water 20 $25 first 15,000 gallons 09/25/02
$1 per 1,000 gals over 15,000
Happy Valley 24 $500 $27.00/0-20,000 gallons 08/03/01
Water System $0.70/1,000 over 20,000 gals.
Island Park 259 $125/yr. 07/01/92
Water Co.
Morning View 84 1/4 acre - $22/mo. 09/01/02
Water Co., Inc. 1/2 acre - $28.45/mo
1 acre - $35.70/mo
Murray Water 25 $800 $26/mo. 07/15/03
Works
Packsaddle Estates 35 $430 $34.24/mo. 06/03/96
Water Co.
Picabo Livestock 39 $500 Summer: $41/mo. 07/01/04
Co. Winter: $22/mo.
Ponderosa 32 $2,500 full time - $48/mo 07/01/03
Terrace Estates part time - $25/mo
Rickel Water Co. 27 $6,000 $30/0-15,000 gallons 04/25/97
$1.10/1,000 gals. over 15,000 gals.
Spirit Lake 293 $1,200 $12/0-9,000 gallons 06/09/04
East Water Co. $1/1,000 gals. over 9,000 gals.
Stoneridge 166 $925 $14 +$0.30/1000 gallons 4/05/02
Water Co. For all consumption
Sunbeam 22 $12/0-12,000 gallons 05/31/83
Water Co. $1.20/1,000 gals. over 12,000 gals.
Troy Hoffman 144 $458 $5.50/0-3,000 gallons 08/01/96
Water Co. 60 cents/1,000 gals. over 3,000 gals.
United Water 75,400 Summer: $14.60/bimonthly 09/02/05
Idaho $1.3581/100cf
Winter: $14.60/bimonthly
$1.0865/100cf
--PAGE 34--
Name No. of Hook-up Mo. Residential Rates1 Rates Last
of Utility CustomersFee (unless otherwise noted) Revised
Resort Water Co. 287 $44.80/month 03/15/05
Terra Grande Water 117 $13 plus
$0.9825 per 100cf winter
$1.228 per 100cf summer
Water companies seek significant increases
Several water companies, including the
state’s largest, sought significant
increases during 2005, most because of
new wells or expansion to accommodate
increasing customers.
In August, United Water, which serves about 75,400 customers in Ada and Canyon counties, was
allowed an approximate 7.68 increase after initially requesting 22 percent and then revising its request to
18 percent.
The company petitioned the commission for reconsideration on some issues. The commission denied
most of United Water’s petition but did grant some changes that brought the overall increase up to 8.08
percent. Not satisfied with the commission’s ultimate decision, United Water is appealing to the state
Supreme Court.
Expenses related to rapid customer growth, including construction of the $28 million Columbia Water
Treatment Plant, prompted the rate increase request. United Water stated it has gained 10,000 customers
and its operating costs have increased by $4.7 million since its last rate increase in 2000.
United Water was allowed an increase of $2,435,516 in its annual revenues. The company originally
requested $6.77 million and then modified its request to $5.6 million. United Water was allowed a return
on equity of 10.3 percent and a cost of debt of 6.675 percent. The company sought 11.1 percent return on
equity and a 6.9 percent cost of debt. The overall rate of return is 8.357 percent. The company originally
sought 8.93 percent.
The commission denied United Water’s request for a 36 percent increase in its bi-monthly service charge
from $14.47 to $19.86. The commission said the company’s current customer service charge is sufficient
to recover customer costs related to meter reading and billing.
The commission approved a water bill assistance program for low-income customers and a small summer
block rate that allows customers to pay the non-summer rate (25 percent less than the summer rate) on the
first 300 cubic feet (2,244 gallons) of bi-monthly use during the summer months. An average household
uses about 10,750 gallons for indoor use over a two-month period, according to the American Water
Works Association Research Foundation.
--PAGE 35--
Read more about United water rate case, UWI-W-04-04:
http://www.puc.state.id.us/internet/press/080305_UWIratecasefinal.htm
http://www.puc.state.id.us/internet/press/092005_UniWtreconsidr.htm
Bitterroot Water Company, which
serves about 117 households near Athol, is
requesting an increase in its metered base
rates from $20 per month to $45.
The commission has yet to rule on the
matter. The company claims the increase
is needed to offset increasing costs
associated with the operation,
maintenance and capital improvements to its water system. Bitterroot contends that in the last 12 months
the water system has been upgraded to maintain compliance with increasingly tougher government
standards for water quality.
At year’s end, the commission was also considering a request by Falls Water Company of rural Idaho
Falls for a 48.2 percent increase it says is needed to keep up with the increasing costs of operations and
maintenance and to replace its aging infrastructure.
The commission allowed Eagle Water Company authority to collect a one-year 42.5 percent surcharge
on water use above 600 cubic-feet per month to recover expenses the company incurred to make
immediate repairs to its system.
The surcharge will collect up to $160,389, but the commission is withholding final judgment on $40,000
of that total to further examine whether customers should be charged for a water line that had to be
replaced due to a construction mishap. If that $40,000 is withheld from recovery, the duration of the one-
year surcharge will be shortened.
Eagle Water, a private company that is not the same as the City of Eagle’s municipal water service,
sought a three-year 40.85 percent surcharge, which would have collected $517,477 to allow the company
to drill a new well as well as pay the cost of the recent repairs and an engineering study. But the
commission denied that large of a recovery, saying an engineering report should be completed before
authorizing cost recovery of major infrastructure projects. The surcharge that the commission will allow
pays for immediate improvements and the engineering study.
--PAGE 36--
Read more about
Bitterroot Water request, BIT-W-05-01, at:
http://www.puc.state.id.us/internet/press/102005_BitterRootWtr.htm
Falls Water request, FLS-W-05-01, at:
http://www.puc2.idaho.gov/intranet/cases/water/FLS/FLSW0501/ordn
otc/20051128NOTICE_OF_APPLICATION.PDF
Eagle Water surcharge, EAG-W-05-02, at:
http://www.puc.state.id.us/internet/press/110105_EagWater.htm