Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20040112_726.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER SMITH CO MMISSI 0 NER HANSEN COMMISSION SECRETARY LEGAL WORKING FILE FROM:DOUG COOLEY DATE:JANUARY 6, 2004 RE:STAFF REVIEW OF INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS; CASE NOS. QWE-02-6 AND QWE-04- BACKGROUND Under the provisions of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. 9252(e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only ifit finds that the agreement: (1) discriminates against telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 U.C. 9252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission recently noted in Order No. 28427 companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms, prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provisions with Section 251(b) or (c)." Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis original). This comports with the FCC' statement that , " a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements of (Part 51)." 47 C.R. 951.3. THE CURRENT APPLICATIONS The Commission has been asked to approve one interconnection agreement and one amendment to an existing interconnection agreement. The items are discussed in greater detail below. DECISION MEMORANDUM JANUARY 6, 2004 1. Qwest Corporation and InteraTel LLC. (Case No. QWE- T -02-6).In this Application the parties request that the Commission approve an amendment to an existing interconnection agreement. The amendment adds new rates for Exhibit A in Qwest's Statement of Generally Available Terms (SGAT). 2. Qwest Corporation and Sprint Communications Company (Case No. QWE- T -04-1 ). this Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an interconnection agreement. The terms of the agreement are similar to those in other agreements that have been approved by this Commission. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the Applications and did not find that any terms or conditions are discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff believes that the agreements are consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the federal Telecommunications Act. Accordingly, Staff believes that the agreements merit the Commission s approval. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission approve the Applications for interconnection and amendment to existing interconnection agreements? i:dmemolintc dm32 DECISION MEMORANDUM JANUARY 6, 2004