20031215_709.pdf

DECISION MEMORANDUM
TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER
COMMISSIONER SMITH
COMMISSIONER HANSEN
COMMISSION SECRETARY
COMMISSION STAFF
LEGAL
FROM:JOHN R. HAMMOND
DATE:DECEMBER 12, 2003
RE:IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CAPITOL WATER CORP. TO
USE MONEY IN A SURCHARGE ACCOUNT TO RETIRE A LOAN EARLY.
CASE NO. CAP-03-
APPLICATION
On September 30, 2003 , Capitol Water Corp. filed an Application requesting
Commission authorization to use $100 000 in the surcharge account to retire a loan early (Loan 1),
thereby immediately eliminating a surcharge (Surcharge 1) on customer rates. The Company says
this is possible because the amount borrowed for another loan was less than anticipated and the
interest rate was reduced from 7% to 5.65%. The amount to pay this loan offis about $63 000. The
Company claims that this would leave a balance of more than $40 000 to help satisfy continuing
Loan 2 amortization costs, phosphate purchases, and power expense. The Company contends that by
retiring Surcharge 1 early money can be saved on the interest charges and will reduce consumers
bills. The Company requests the Commission approve its Application quickly because it contends it
is in the best interest of ratepayers.
On November 10, 2003, the Commission issued Notice of Application and Notice of
Modified Procedure. Order No. 29376. In response to the Commission s Order the Commission
Staffwas the only party to file written comments.
BACKGROUND
On July 1 , 1997, the Commission authorized Capitol Water Company to incur debt to
fund certain water quality improvements for its system. Case No. CAP- W -96-, Order No. 27022.
The principal loan amount was $402 624., (Loan 1). Order No. 27022. The Commission
DECISION MEMORANDUM
authorized the Company to collect a surcharge (Surcharge 1) of $3.27 a month from its unmetered
residential customers and a 25.2% increase for metered commercial customers to recover loan
amortization costs, annual Idaho Power Company Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) charges, the annual
purchase cost of phosphates for water treatment and incremental income taxes associated with the
surcharge. Order Nos. 27022 and 28801. The surcharge would allow the Company to amortize the
loan over a seven-year period, ending August 1 2004. Id.
On May 22, 2002, the Commission authorized the Company to incur an additional
$507 000 in debt (Loan 2) to finance improvements to its water system. Case No. CAP-02-
Order No. 29035. The Commission authorized the Company to institute a second surcharge
(Surcharge 2) of$3.10 a month for residential flat-rate customers and 23.6% for metered customers
that would recover only loan amortization costs and incremental income taxes associated with the
surcharge over a seven-year period. Id.
STAFF REVIEW
Staff reviewed the Company s Application, audited the surcharge accounts, and worked
closely with Capitol Water over the years to insure that both the borrowed funds and the amounts
collected through the surcharges have been properly applied and accounted for.
Staff believes that the Company s contention that a surplus in its accounts has
accumulated is accurate. However, Staff contends that the Company has undercharged its surcharge
accounts and thus the balance is actually smaller than it claims. Staff believes two adjustments
should be made to the Company s surcharge accounts. First, Capitol Water has undercharged its
surcharge accounts by failing to include amounts paid to Idaho Power at PCA rates in place over the
past several years. Staff believes the Company s surcharge account balance should be adjusted
downward by $4 126 to recognize the changes in PCA rates. In addition, Staff recommends that
Capitol Water adjust its charges to the surcharge account each May when Idaho Power Company
PCA rate adjustment becomes effective. Second, Staffbelieves the Company has undercharged its
surcharge account balance by $11 597 for income taxes paid for the years 2001 and 2002. Staff
recommends that every year Capitol Water calculate the effect of the surcharges on its income tax
liability and charge the incremental income tax expense to the surcharge account in a timely manner.
Based on these adjustments Staff believes the Company s surcharge account balance should actually
be $91 140 as of September 30 2003.
DECISION MEMORANDUM
Staff supports Capitol Water s request to pay off the balance of Loan 1 with the adjusted
surplus balance and commends the Company for bringing this Application to the Commission.
Accordingly, Staff recommends that the Commission authorize the Company to use the surplus funds
in its surcharge account to retire Loan 1 early. Staff also recommends that the Commission authorize
the Company to eliminate Surcharge 1 that is associated with Loan 1.
Staff was also concerned that the remaining surcharge, Surcharge 2, would not provide
the cash flow for the Company to service Loan 2 and pay for the phosphates and Idaho Power
annual PCA rate changes. See Order Nos. 29035. Staff stated this could cause the Company to file a
general rate case to recover these costs in its base rates. Thus, Staff recommends that the
Commission authorize the Company to adjust the remaining surcharge upward by $0.45 per month
for flat rate customers and by 3.5 percentage points for metered customers. Staffbelieves this would
provide sufficient revenue to cover the ongoing PCA and phosphate costs. The purpose of including
the Idaho PCA charges and phosphate costs in the calculation is to make Capitol Water whole
neither benefiting nor penalizing the Company. Staff does not anticipate an increase in profits to the
Company as a result of the incremental increase and any excess funds collected should be used to
retire Loan 2 early.
Staff contends the elimination of Loan 1 and Surcharge 1 early in combination with the
small upward adjustment to Surcharge 2 would allow the Company s flat rate customers to realize a
reduction in surcharges from $6.37 per month to $3.55 per month or a surcharge reduction of
44.27%. The surcharges that metered customers pay will change from 48.8% per month to 27.1 % or
a 44.47% reduction. The elimination of Loan 1 at an interest rate of 9% would also benefit the
Company s customers who are paying its carrying costs through Surcharge 1. Based on the
recommended modifications to Capitol Water s Application, Staff believes Commission approval
would benefit the Company s customers in the long run.
Finally, Staff reviewed the Company s improvement projects currently approved in Order
No. 29306. The Company plans to install a back up generator at Well No.4 at an estimated cost of
$ 7 5 000 and begin an aquifer recharge proj ect to provide water quality improvements at an estimated
cost of$20 000. The Company has sufficient borrowing capacity in the 2002 loan to complete these
activities. The interest rate of this loan is between 5.5 and 6% as represented by the Company.
DECISION MEMORANDUM
Therefore customers will see a reduction in overall bills and the Company will be able to complete
its project needs previously approved by the Commission.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approving the Company s request to use the existing funds to pay-off
Loan 1 and retire Surcharge 1. Staff further recommends that Surcharge 2 be increased by $.45 per
month to $3.55 for flat rate customers and 3.5 percentage points to 27.1 % per month for metered
customers to recover ongoing PCA and phosphate costs.
COMMISSION DECISION
Does the Commission wish to approve Capitol Water s Application with the
modifications suggested by the Commission Staff?
M:CAPWO301jh2
ond
DECISION MEMORANDUM