20030606_496.pdf

DECISION MEMORANDUM
TO:CO MMISSI 0 NER KJELLAND ER
COMMISSIONER SMITH
CO MMISSI 0 NER HANSEN
COMMISSION SECRETARY
COMMISSION STAFF
LEGAL
WORKING FILE
FROM:DOUG COOLEY
DATE:JUNE 2, 2003
RE:STAFF REVIEW OF INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS; CASE
NOS. QWE-02-, and QWE-03-12.
BACKGROUND
Under the provisions of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection
agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 US.C. ~ 252(e)(l). The
Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only ifit finds that the agreement:
(1) discriminates against telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2)
implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and
necessity. 47 US.C. ~ 252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission recently noted in Order No. 28427
companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms, prices and
conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provisions with Section
25l(b) or (c)." Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis original). This comports with the FCC'
statement that
, "
a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement
adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements
of (Part 51)." 47 C.R. ~ 51.3.
THE CURRENT APPLI CA TI 0
The Commission has been asked to approve one interconnection agreement and one
amendment to an interconnection agreement. The items are discussed in greater detail below.
1. Owest Corporation and New Edge Networks (Case No. QWE-02-20). In this
Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an amendment to an existing
DECISION MEMORANDUM JUNE 2, 2003
interconnection agreement. This amendment replaces rates for all elements of the existing
interconnection agreement.
2. Qwest Corporation and iLoka, Inc. (Case No. OWE-03-l2).In this Application, the
parties request that the Commission approve an interconnection agreement. The terms, rates, and
conditions are similar to interconnection agreements approved by this Commission. (Qwest Idaho
SGAT)
STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed the Applications and did not find that any terms or conditions are
discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff believes that the agreements are consistent
with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the Federal
Telecommunications Act. Accordingly, Staff believes that the agreements merit the
Commission s approval.
COMMISSION DECISION
Does the Commission approve the Application for Interconnection Agreement and the
Amendment to Interconnection Agreement?
---', ///' ~
7 (/ 6'
DOug Cool
i:dmemo/intc dm25
DECISION MEMORANDUM JUNE 2, 2003