Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20221107Veolia to Staff 41.pdfVEOLIA WATER IDAHO, INC.’S RESPONSES TO SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF PAGE 1 OF 3 16453904_1.DOCX (30-235) Preston N. Carter, ISB No. 8462 Morgan D. Goodin, ISB No. 11184 Givens Pursley LLP 601 W. Bannock St. Boise, ID 83702 Telephone: (208) 388-1200 Facsimile: (208) 388-1300 prestoncarter@givenspursley.com morgangoodin@givenspursley.com Attorneys for Veolia Water Idaho, Inc. BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF VEOLIA WATER IDAHO, INC. FOR A GENERAL RATE CASE Case No. VEO-W-22-02 VEOLIA WATER IDAHO, INC.’S RESPONSES TO SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Veolia Water Idaho, Inc. (“Veolia” or “Company”), in response to the Second Production Request of the Commission Staff to Veolia Water Idaho, Inc. dated October 19, 2022, submits the information below. The requested documents will be provided under the terms of the Protective Agreement. RECEIVED 2022 November 7, PM 12:30 IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION VEOLIA WATER IDAHO, INC.’S RESPONSES TO SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF PAGE 2 OF 3 16453904_1.DOCX (30-235) DATED: November 7, 2022. By:_____________________________ Preston N. Carter Givens Pursley LLP Attorneys for Veolia Water Idaho, Inc. VEOLIA WATER IDAHO, INC.’S RESPONSES TO SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF PAGE 3 OF 3 16453904_1.DOCX (30-235) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT on November 7, 2022, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing to be served upon the following parties as indicated below: Jan Noriyuki Commission Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 jan.noriyuki@puc.idaho.gov secretary@puc.idaho.gov Email U.S. Mail Fax Hand Delivery Preston N. Carter VEO-W-22-02 IPUC DR 41 Page 1 of 2 VEOLIA WATER IDAHO, INC. CASE VEO-W-22-02 SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Bui REQUEST NO. 41: In reference to the Black & Veatch’s Customer Class Load Study discussed in Bui’s Direct Testimony at 7; please provide all workpapers in electronic format with formulas enabled supporting the Load Study. RESPONSE NO. 41: Three electronic files are provided that contain the main set of calculations for estimating peak factors by customer class, and these are further described below. The source data supporting this project was extensive: over half a billion raw AMI data records (individual hourly meter readings) were stored on a Snowflake data cloud and accessed by Black & Veatch analysts. Raw data was loaded, cleaned, and transformed in an SQL server and then exported to other databases and business intelligence tools for analysis and data visualization and used in the three files listed below. Attachment 1: HourlyProductionSummary.xlsx. This file contains hourly production volumes and reservoir storage volume changes for the VWID system and is used to identify system max day and max hour timeframes. Attachment 2: UsageSummaries v2.xlsm. This file uses a data query from the billing database to establish typical average and seasonal usage values by customer class. The data is then joined with available AMI meter information to identify which customers have AMI meters and to compare usage metrics for customers on AMI accounts against usage metrics for all customers by customer class. VEO-W-22-02 IPUC DR 41 Page 2 of 2 Attachment 3: VWID Load Study Results.xlsx. This file uses the representative AMI accounts identified in File 2 to construct hourly estimates of usage by each customer class for the maximum day and hour periods identified for the study and determination of coincident and non-coincident peaking factors.