20171106Teton Water to Staff 1-5.pdf

f
Date
TETON WATER & SEWER COMpANy RECETVED
Po Box 786, Driggs Idaho 83422
z0l7ll0v -6 Al,l 9: l5
october 2s,20r7 '.,1i[i.li.i]u:5oil8s,oH,
To: Idaho Public Utilities Commission
Prepared By: Jon Pinardi, Teton Water & Sewer Company
RE:Case No. TTS-W-I7-01
Response to First Production Request of Commission Staff
Enclosed is a CD containing the full system map, on file with Idaho Department of Environmental Quality. The
overview map is located on ASBWl, Pumphouse information on ASBW 76-77 and Storage Tank information
on tab titled "Pittsburg". The totality of the pages show all of the system equipment, pipes, valves and hydrants.
The water treatment equipment is housed in the pumphouses.
a. Well #l is Goulds 7 clc, Well#2is Goulds 5RWAL
b. Well #1 is Goulds 7 clc. Well#2is Goulds SRWAL
c. There is no pressurized storage tank
d. Pittsburg, please reference enclosed CD, file name "Pittsburg"
e. There are no booster pumpsf. Well #1 uses a Blue-White M224-SND chlorinator pump. Well #2 uses a Blue-White A1N20V-47
chlorinator pump.
Request No. 2
The enclosed CD shows the proposed new well location on ASBWl. Also enclosed is a Transfer Application to
IDWR, referenced as Appendix A, prepared by Rendezvous Engineering and dated October 19,2017. This
document shows further refinement.
With regard to alternatives to drilling a new well, the Company considered only 2 alternatives:
l. The possibility of increasing production of Well#2
2. The possibility of increasing "storage" capacity beyond the current 500,000 gallons
To meet the goal of redundancy in the event of a well failure, option 2 was not deemed prudent. Also, given the
location of the current reservoir and complexities and potential costs associated with this option, this option was
not pursued.
As to option 1, and to answer the question of why drilling a new well was preferable to option 1, in addition to
the information contained in Appendix A, I would like to present the enclosed document titled "Response to
Idaho Public Utilities Commission Production Request to Teton Springs 'Water", dated November 2,2011,
hereafter referenced as Appendix B.
Request No. I
Request No 3
With respect to the teleconference conducted between Commission staff and Jon Pinardi a few weeks ago, I
thought it prudent to present these documents to answer the question of "why" a new well as opposed to
spending additional funds to have Rendezvous Engineering prepare a new and separate response.
Please let me know if you require anything fuither to satisfy this Request.
Request No 4
This information has been requested from Rendezvous Engineering and will be provided at a later date.
Request No 5
There have not yet been any invoices paid for the research and development of the new well as of October 29,
20t7.
Per requirement, a copy of this reply, in addition to copies of Appendix A and Appendix B are contained on the
enclosed CD.
YOU,
Jon
Water & Sewer Company
(208) 3s4-02s6
(208) 20r-4798
APP"-d"t o A
F-.!+ Pro&-, c-g'r.- V 2,--af
RENDEZyOUS ENG|NEERING, P.C. tolaTltl
Civil Engineers and Planners in Wyoming and ldaho
Rendezzvous Project No: 17-030
October 19,2017 r.:..,-t
lMr. tVlichael Holliday
Water Rights Supervisor
IDWR Eastern Region
900 N Skyline Dr, Suite A
ldaho Falls, lD 83402-1718
ff)c)RE: Water Right 22-13178, Transfer Application for Change ln Point of D@rsioI
Dear [/r. Holliday:
Attached for your review is a Transfer Application for a change in the point of diversion
filed on behalf of Teton Water and Sewer Company, LLC, the current holder of Water
Right 22-13178. This application is intended to provide a third point of diversion in the
form of a new groundwater supply well to be constructed in the NE % SE Te Section 23
T3N R45E. A more accurate location will be provided once a site plan for the well
connection and control building is finalized.
As you are aware, this water right serves the 774 acre Teton Springs Golf and Casting
Club development located just south of Victor ldaho in Sections 13, 14,23, 24 T3N,
R45E. The first subdivision plat was filed in 2000 as the project was developed in
phases. With amendments, the current project is entitled for approximately 656
residential units along with various mixed use visitor services. The domestic water
system provides potable use to the development as irrigation is supplied through a
separate raw water system associated with the Trail Creek Sprinkler lrrigation
Company.
Although Water Right 22-13178 allows a diversion rate up to 1.1 cfs (-494 gpm), the
two currentwells are now only able to pump in total about 310 to 330 gpm, Well # 1,
located in the northeast corner of the Teton Springs development, had to be throttled to
a flow of about 250-260 gpm due to sediment entrainment issues that occur at higher
flow rates. These sediment issues have persisted after several attempts to redevelop
the well and nearly 15 years of consistent pumping. Therefore the system managers
have been forced to reduce the well output of their primary water supply. Well # 1 is
also a warm water source (-95F) which can at times create aesthetic concerns at the
point of use.
Well # 2 was drilled in the southeast corner of the development, targeting groundwater
associated with the underlying lt/ladison Limestone. The well was drilled to a depth of
nearly 1200 feet in search of fractures to generate an adequate yield. lnitially tested at a
25 S o uth G ros Ve n tre
:
tr";.,: iJ# gX' " " ?x.o-T3r.iir".1".ii'
wvo m i n s 8 3 0 0 1
tt
.11/,'l I
llilt) il//L-)l
!\,(b
(= .,tJ<:mrCr(,r ril
=rnIG' U
[:
ctt
F
'- {t}
l'o
:;rn
flow of 150 gpm in 2001, the current rate has dropped to about60-70 gpm, with over
250 feet of drawdown. Well # 2 has always been less efficient in terms of yield per foot
of drawdown, however, longer pump run times during the summer months has
appeared to only exacerbate the drawdown and reduce output. This was apparent
during the past summer when Well #1 was out of service for less than 12 hours and the
system relied entirely on Well #2. Well #2 was unable to keep up with even "off-peak"
demand causing dangerously low storage levels.
A third well is therefore being planned to make up this difference while improving the
overall reliability and efficiency of the system, The proposed Well # 3 site is based upon
the geologic log from Well # 2 which also targeted bedrock layers associated with the
Madison Limestone. Unlike other highly productive wells developed in this formation,
Well # 2 did not encounter the type of fracturing necessary generate yields necessary
for this municipal system. ln contrast, the current selected site, located about 1000 feet
west of Well # 2, is between two existing springs which are believed to be associated
with similar bedrock layers and indicators or more extensive fracturing.
Current preliminary projections from the project geologist suggest a target drilling depth
of about 800 feet. The general target yield is 150 gpm however, as noted in the
attached application, the full diversion rate of 1.1 cfs is requested with this transfer.
This would allow full water right allocation to be pumped in the event that the well is
shown to be capable of higher yields. This would also enable the operators to rotate all
three wells and rest Wells # 1 and # 2, especially during the peak summer use period.
The attached map shows the proposed location of Well # 3 along with the key Teton
Springs water system components which include the distribution mains, Well #1 and
Well # 2 and the 500,000 gallon storage tank. The map also shows la Tq seclion lines
for the entire development and platted lots representing the places of use for this water
right. Also attached is Table 1 which is a summary by lo Tn section of the areas of use
for this new well along with the two existing wells. Please note that there are three lo Ta
sections, highlighted with red font, that were omitted from the places of use listed for
Water Right 22-13178. We believe that this was a minor translation error that we would
like to see corrected in the record.
We are also attaching with this application the following documents:
1) Additional information to accompany the standard transfer application.
2) Table 1 summarizing well locations and places of use by %% section.
3) Certificate of Organization, Amended Ceftificate of Organization and 2017
Annual report for Teton Water and Sewer Company LLC as demonstration that
the signer of the application, Jon Pinardi, is an authorized representative of the
company.
RENDEZVOUS ENGINEERING, P.C.
I,'ai
t( il.-ll li Page 2 of 3
4) Acknowledgement Letter dated 6-20-2012 indicating that Teton Water and
Sewer Company, LLC is the owner of Water Right 22-13178 This also provides
information on the recorded water right as requested on the Transfer Application.
5) Grant of Easement for placement of utilities in Open Space lots 1 - 7. The well
will be located in Open Space Lot 1.
6) Sheets 1 and 6 from instrument#195405 which is the recorded consolidated
plat for Teton Springs Golf and Casting Club summarizing the various phases
and amendments. This exhibit shows the proposed Well # 3 site relative to the
existing platted lots.
7) lllustrative map of the Teton Springs water system showing the mains, wells,
storage tank and platted lots with public land section breakdowns.
Thanks for your assistance and let us know if you need any additional information
regarding this application.
Sincerely,
Robert T. Ablondi
ldaho PE 5994
Cc: Jon Pinardi, Teton Water and Sewer Company, LLC
Rrru oezvous Eru en tpERtN c. P.c -
,,;i/: li
_lIi// lt Page 3 of3
42-222POD -09t14 STATE OF IDAHO
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
AppLtcATroN FoR TRANSFER OF WATER R|GHT - POINT(S) OF DIVERSIoN
This form may be used to apply to change andlor add points ofdiversion for existing water rights and to report an ownership change
for a water right(s) in connection with the proposed point of diversion change(s). Do not use this form to apply for changes to other
elements of a water right. See the -lp12lja!1211fut_D tuA/q:_ !.1.t511'trq-lLy2gs_ for help completing this form and for mailing addresses of
Department offices where your application can be submitted,
Check all that apply:
tr Change diversion point(s) E aaa diversion point(s)E Ownership change n Ownership split
p1,on" 208-201-4798l. APPLTCANT(S)Teton Water and Sewer Company, LLC
2. MAILING ADDRESS 3940 Grand Street City Driggs
State ldaho Zip 83422 Email [e-mail]
I ttttre applicant is not an individual and not registered to do business in the State of Idaho, attach documentation identifoing
officers authorized to sign for the applicant.
f tf tne applicant is not the current water right(s) owner, aftach documentation of authority to file the application.
E tttne application includes a change in ownership of water right(s), attach a copy of the conveyance document, such as a
warranty deed, court decree, contract ofsale, etc. The conveyance document must include a legal description ofthe property
conveyed or description of the water right if no land is conveyed. Additional fee(s) are required for water right ownership
changes; see ltem 9 for the fc_p ssllsdule.
If the ownership change resulted in the water right(s) being split, how did the division occur? Mark one:
! fne water rights or claims were divided as specifically identified in a deed, contract, or other conveyance document.
n fne water rights or claims were divided proportionately based on the portion of their place(s) of use acquired by the
new owner.
f, ttttre application is not signed by the applicant, attach a Power of Attorney or other documentation providing authority to sign
for the applicant.
3. LIST WATER RIGHT NUMBER(S)22-13178
@ ettach a copy of the water right(s) as recorded, available at ytry.1-t!.y1;.1/11119,g;q) l4/ater Right Transfers, Step /, or by
contacting any Department office.
4. TOTAL AMOUNT OF WATER transferred is 1.1 cubic feet per second and/or nla acre-feet per annum
(diversion rate) (storage volume)
5. POINT OF DMRSION - Describe all the point(s) of diversion to be included on the water right(s) after the proposed change.
f ettach Eastern Snake Plain Aquifer (ESPA) analysis if this transfer proposes to change a point of diversion affecting the
ESPA. ESPA analysis information is available at "UrUW.1d-fU,jf!e-Lfq.Sqy, I{ater Right Transfers, Online Resources.
New?Lot %%%Sec Twp Rge County Source Local name or tag #
No NE SE 14 3N 45E Teton groundwater Well# 1 1D0011791
No NW SW 24 3N 45E Teton groundwater Well# 21D0021651
Yes NE SE 23 3N 45E Teton groundwater Well# 3 (new)
Pagel of2 Transfer No.
.-a
6. GENERAL INFORMATION
a. Describe the complete diversion system, including how you will accommodate a measuring device and lockable controlling
works should they be"required now or in the future:
See attached information
b. Who owns the property at the point(s)of diversion? Golf Land LLC
Ifother than the applicant, describe the arrangement enabling the applicant to access the property for the diversion system:
This open space area was previously set aside for a third well. See attached information
c. To your knowledge, has/is any portion ofthe water right(s) proposed to be changed:
Yes No
X E undergone a period offive or more consecutive years ofnon-use,
X E currently used in a mitigation plan limiting the use of water under the right(s), or
tr A currently enrolled in a Federal set-aside program limiting the use of water under the righ(s)?
Ifyes, describe:
d. Is any portion of the water right(s) proposed to be changed currently leased to the Water Supply Bank?
tr If yes and there are multiple owners, attach a Lessor Desisnation form.
tr If yes, the individual owner or designated lessor must complete, sign and attach an IRS Form W-9.
(Disregard if these items are on file and ownership has not changed.)
X Yes ENo
7. MAP - E ettach a map of the diversion, measurement, control and distribution system. Include the place of use if a split of the
water right occurred. Clearly label the map with township, range, section and % Vq of section information. The Map Tool,
available v1 naps.idv,r.idaho.qov,t'li'crns.fet'Appliccttionl-avouts.i provides a satisfactory template for creating the required map.
8. SIGN - The information in this application is true to the best of my knowledge. I understand any willful
s in this application may result in rejection ofthe application or cancellation ofan approval.
Jon Pinardi, Manager
of or authorized agent Print name and title if applicable Date
Signature ofapplicant or authorized agent Print name and title if applicable Date
9. FEE - [ fne application filing fee provided in Section 42-221,ldaho Code, must be submitted with the application for transfer.
The Application fee is based on the total amount ofwater proposed for transfer in Item 4: the larger fee for either cubic feet per
second (diversion rate) or acre-feet per annum (storage volume). The l''ee Schedule is available at wwt.y.idtvr.idaho.got,, l4/ater
Right Transfers, Step 4 and inlhe .4pplicotion.lbr h'ons.fet' lnstntctions.
FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Transfer includes pages ofattachments. Received by
Fee paid Date Receipted by Receipt #
Preliminary review by Date- Active in the Water Supply Bank? Yes n No E
W-9 received? Yes n No fl Name on W-9 W-9 forwarded to fiscal? Yes n No E
Page? of2
(Do NOT scan the W-9 - confidential infolmation is held by fiscal only)
Date
t
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
TO ACCOMPANY APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF WATER RIGHTS
POINTS OF DIVERSION
APPLICANT: TETON WATER AND SEWER COMPANY, LLC
WATER RIGHT 22.13'178
4. TOTAL AMOUNT OF WATER
This transfer application will enable proposed Well # 3 to divert groundwater up to the
maximum allowed under Water Right 22-13178 (1.1 cfs) so that this well can be rotated
with the other two existing wells to maximize options during peak demands periods and
provide redundancy in response to repairs or outages affecting Wells # I and Well # 2.
5. POINTS OF DIVERSION.
Well # 1 and Well # 2are existing. The listed %%% section (10 acre) location forWell
# 3 is approximate and is to be confirmed once final construction plans are prepared.
The attached Table 1 shows areas of use and points of diversion for Water Right 22-
13178. As noted in attached Table 1, two T+ Te sections are missing from the place of
use tabulation currently of record for this water right.
6. GENERAL INFORMATION.
a. Well # 3, like existing Well # 1 and Well # 2, will be equipped with a submersible
pump and motor installed inside the well casing. The well will discharge through a below
ground pitless unit that will connect to piping in an adjacent control building which will in
turn connect directly to the Teton Springs distribution system. Piping in the building will
include a flow meter, isolation valves and side discharge that would allow the well to
pump to waste, separate from the distribution system, for testing and sampling as
necessary in the operation and maintenance of the well. The control building will also
include electrical controls and telemetry equipment necessary tor the operation of the
well.
The distribution system includes a network of 6, 8, and 12 inch water mains connected
to an elevated 500,000 gallon storage tank. The distribution system "floats" on the
storage tank which has an operating level that maintains pressure for the entire service
area while providing operating, emergency and fire suppression storage. The attached
map shows the principal system components.
The flow from the well can be isolated at each control building with valves. The wells
can also be "locked out" with the associated electrical switchgear.
b. Attached with this application is the record plat map, lnstrument#195405, showing
the proposed location of Well # 3 on existing Open Space Lot 1, currently owned by
Golf Land LLC. The open space lots are subject to a general easement for utilities
including supply wells. lf Well # 3 is successful, a separate well lot may be created as
has been done forWells # 1 and#2.
co
(o
=-o(o#
L
.o)g
Lq)
(o
=c0)LLfotr ^^q6 P9)HLLL^s.- .- u
U).o .o *cxxY'aooo-
6 vvv'=ccctrooo
92 E'E Eg{0)0)c)
ba66
arSsF6ooo(6ts==
^.=-=.=*o o oJ4TL(L(L6-^-qD:th+t+t(u---
o-O O Oe===
zaPsll-l -> ,r5o$lroo;u)ot-U)z>
-- o)
(L6
-N
HErdr
IINOr@Tlu Oon1;(L I.!.Fr<
LU=
m
F
IJJa x
=a x
=z x x
IJJo
IIJz x
IIJo X
=o x x
=z X x x=o
UJz x
UJo x
=U'x x
Ez x x=z
t!z x
u.lo x
=U'x
=z x
UJz
ulz x
ooU'
(Y)(r)N sN
oc,t turf)rt
ulrO$
I,JJ|f)$
turOs
o
B z(f)O
z
cf)o
z(f)o
z(r)o
TI
II
251
CERTIFICATE OF ORGANIZ/.T0'N
LIMITED LIABILI7Y COMPANY
(lncttrdionr on back of applicaGon)
FILED EFF
lii f,lt.i ;? i.ir fi: 5l
SECiT:l'i.RY 0F STATEirl.iil 0F tDAhO
1. Thc n ntl of hr lltr{bd lhtIlity company io:
5J P . vt-L
2. Thr aomplob rtsrrt u$ mefliryg edfircrrc of 0ro inithl de$nrtrd oficr:
34qo @*-,,9- tt'ct-l' . Cn\eqs PD 83\27
(Ot'ad Addr..,gs
fi.ftg ^dfi..,
I ftrrrl tll]r *rrl *fr}
3. Th. nfln rldcoilrb *t t dCrrl olth. ngbbi.d.e.tt
Jo,^ ?"r'r"1"'3?tu> A.e*.Q bt4A- ?er^t,3Dt|\zZ(Nrill (*rtfd0.o,
tl. Ih. nm. rnd drhtr d I hct m. mfit r or niltrgor of tr Imlld hlary
sapany:
3?r*p 6r *q Sfirz*,3o E3Yzz-
rr
?,-s.A Atqo 6,^4 5F..-*. Oar$t Jb 83lzz
av--
5. M.krg ldfrrr btfrJn ffitryondJrc. (..rflJd nport rdol):
Sncr-r
C. FuAr. rillhcflvo fi.of {Thg (optbad}:
Slgneturo of r moorber or rsdrorir.dpiton.
Slgnafr,m
Typ.d l*ne:
Sign*fi
Tlrp.d
t crtIy{,
IDffM SECNSIf,RY llF STO?EO4rrtP.leBt? B.S2[ilg
61(1 000 ETr 3tB6{1 BHr l3-194i0I t 1t8,80 = 188.88 0f,Sll LLC I e
a uL907
Iloo Tt &ts:Dr:g,- &r#r €g-89qqq
AMENDMENT To FILED F,FFEcTIVE
aERTIFI9ATEoF oRGANlzATtoN tz hp* n qfriiis_
LIMITED LIABILITYCOMPANY SEci
(tnswctions on badr orapdicatirn) silruftlfit*
1. Thrnrmodttolimite'dliabilitycornpanyir:
S]LC
2. Thonsnref Tr.lknibd llabilitycompeny h rmmdrdb nrd:
enb LLL
3. Thr 6e fr. o;frcdr d oryrrdz.flsr wr o{gltrty fu :q ) ru)r-otz-
a.tTrr ounplrtr *!ot.nd maehg.de...o olho dalgild effidpd oilia. b
areldrdb:
S. fmmtUedrtrolbrfutmomrpcndoo(.nntdlrrortlblturdrdb:
6.Thrnrnrr$rddrorofthrNrE m.rll9tt/mc*.rrAr&Jrd !. mililLd rfrlour:M
tr
tr
tr
!{L otr
tr
tr
E]
7,rffiodzrdp.rsoa.
Or a4t6p-l
Sfinr*rr
Typrot*rp
toct*f o, ttrf u!. q{y
IDflII SECNETRRY tr STEltgB4./17/AEI"?, fi,$=QEH(: ?0E3 CT: Elg64l lll: 1319??3I 3 3f.ffi = 38.8 tsml flEll I e
ro t2qb1
" Teton County GIS - Parcel Map Page 1 ofl
No, W 112967 Due no later than Apr 30,2OLl
Annual Repoft Form
2. Registered Agent and Address
(NO PO BOX)
NO FILING FEE IF
RECEIVED BY DUE DATE
Return to:
SECRETARY OF STATE
7OO WEST ]EFFERSON
PO BOX 83720
BOISE, ID 83720-0080
JON PINARDI
3940 GRAND ST
DRIGGS ID 83422
;- -.'i;'i0"1:;,,1r,,:;.:t;lltr: illlftiilt:1.1.t,, .i::,,:;, r: :: 11,','lii:i'.
TETON WATER AND SEWER COMPANY, LLC
JON PINARDI
3940 GRAND ST
DRIGGS ID 83422 3. New Registered Agent Signature:*
4. Limited Liability Companies: Enter Names and Addresses of at least one Member or Manager.
Office Held Name Street or PO Address CityMEMBER JON PINARDI 3940 GRAND ST DRIGGS
State CountryID USA
Postal Code
83422
5. Organized Under the Laws of:
ID
w L12967
6. Annual Report must be signed.x
Signature: Jon Pinardi
Name (type or print): lon Pinardi
Datet 03lLZl20t7
Titler Member
Processed 0311212017 x Electronically provided signatures are accepted as original signatures,
https://sos.idaho.govlxtl?xp:oh5C20170312%5CXMLPORTS W112967 17031... 101612017
State of Idaho
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Eastern Region,900 North Skytine Drive, SuiteA.Idaho Falls,Idaho 83402-1718
Phone: [phone] . Fax: [phone]. Web Site: www.idwr.idaho.goY
June 20,2012 C. L. "BUTCH'OTTERGovernor
GARYSPACKMAN
Interim DirectorTeton Water & SeweL Co LLC
3940 Grand St
Driggs ID 83422
RE: Clrange of Ownersltip for Watel Right No(s). 22-13178
Dear Water Right Holder(s):
The departrlent acknowledges receipt of correspondence changing ownership of the above referencecl
water right(s) to you. The departrnent has modified its records to reflect the change in ownership arnd
has enclosed computer-generated reports for yortr records.
Check number 2097 for the amount of $25.00 is also being returned. The US Bank National
Association ah'eady paid the $25.00 fiiing for the Notice of Change in Water Right ownelship under
receipt number C095424.
Updating the ownership record fol a water right does not reconfilm the validity of the right. When
processing an ownership change uotice, the department does not review the history of water use to
detet'mine if the right has been deliberately abandoned or forfeited through five years or more ol non-
use. To read more about water right forfeiture, including how to protect a water right from forfeiture,
please see Sections 42-222 and 42-223,Idaho Code.
Also,note that Section 42-248,Idaho Code, requires you or the owner of this water right to
malntarn rrent ownership and address records on file with the department. Forms to file a change of
of a water right and/or a change in the address of the water right owner are available from
any office, or at the departmen t's website at: www.idwr.idaho.gov
feel free to contact this office if yor.r have any questions regarding this matter
Enclosure(s)
cc: Rendezvous neeling PC
US Bank National Association
Water District 01
ical Records
Page 1
WATER BIGHT NUMBER: 22-13178
Owner Tvoe
Representative
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Water Right Report 22-13178
0612012012
Name and Address
RENDEZVOUS ENGINEERING PC
CiO BOB ABLONDI
25 S GROS VENTRE ST
PO BOX 4858
JACKSON, WY 83001
(307) 733-s252
TETON WATEB & SEWER CO LLC
3940 GRAND ST
DFIIGGS,ID 83422
(208)201 -4798
US BANK NATION ASSOCIATION
240 SHOSHONE ST N
TWIN FALLS, ID 83303
Current Owner
Security lnterest
Priority Date:
Basis:
StatUS:
Twp Rge Sec
03N 45E 13
03N 45E 14
03N 45E 23
03N 45E 24
04/09/2008
License
Active
Source
GROUND WATER
Benelicial Use
MUNICIPAL
Location of Point(s) of Diversion
GROUND WATER
TETON County
GROUND WATER
TETON County
Place of Use
MUNICIPAL
Tributary
From To Diversion Rate
01/01 to 12131 1.100 CFS
Total Diversion: 1.100 CFS
NE1/4SE1/4
NW1/4SW1/4
Annual Volume
349.00 AF
349.00 AF
Sec.14, Twp 03N, Bge 45E, B.M.
Sec,24, Twp 03N, Rge 45E, B.M.
SENEINWISWISENE
NEINWISWISE
NW
NEINWISWISE
SW
NEINWISWISExx TotalsI
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
xX
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
XXXX xxxx
XX
x
XXXXX
Page 2 06t2012012
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOUBCES
Water Right Fleport 22-13178
Conditions of Approval:
1. 048 The use of water under this right shall not give rise to any claim against the holder ol a senior water
right based upon the theories of forfeiture, abandonment, adverse possession, waiver, equitable
estoppel, estoppel by laches or customary preference.
2,
3,
4.
128
180
01M
Place of use is within the area served by the public water supply system of Teton Springs Golf and
Casting Club. The place of use is generally located within Sections 13, 14,23, and24, Township 3N,
Flange 45E,
A map depicting the place of use boundary for this water right at the time of this approval is attached to
this document for illustration purposes.
After specific notification by the Department, the right holder shall install a suitable measuring device or
shall enter into an agreement with the Department to determine the amount of water diverted f rom
power records and shall annually report the information to the Department.
Remarks:
lnstrument # 233884
TETON COUNTY. IOAHO
9-17-2014 01108:00 No' of
Recotded for: IiIOULTON LAW
Paqcs: 2
OFFICE
T,IARY LOU I.IANSEN
Ex.Officio Recorder OePutY
i xi,c, ior giSEt''lEllT
3.00
C I{:\ N'f OIr t'],\S [ ;\ I IiN'l'
l;or valuc rcceived, TETON SpltlN(;S GOLF.t CASl'lN(i C:OVII'}ANY, LLC, a Wyonring
lir:titctl liability conrpany (Grantor), ils succcssttr.s and assigus, docs hcrcLry agrcc. convcy, grlrrl nrlcl,rul
itssinrr rrnlo'l'Ii'l'ON WATITR AND SIiWI:lt CON4PAN\', LLC]. irn I(lilho linritcd liability corrlplny
((irantcc), its succcssors and assigns, ltcrpcttttrl easeurcr)ts arrrl llcnclrts. ol thc assignnrcnt ol'it.s
uassn)cllt artd bcttcl'its, fbr irtgrcss. eglcss, utaintcuance, ol)crations. placeurent ol'utilitir-s irrclrrclirrg l'rLrt
not linlit(rd to tltc placenrcnt, cor].strrrclion, rtraintetrar:cc. and opuration of'u,clls aud any ancl all rvatcr
atttl sctver ccluipttrcnt aud inlrastnrctulc ncccssart'and ail otltcr put'lxlscs rcasortablv llcccssitrv t()
itccorntt)orlatc lhc provision olu'atcl antl sc\\'cr utilitv scrvicc lor thc'l'ctttn Sprirtgs planncrl itrtit
clcvglol)111g11t on "Golt'L.and" as clc-sct'itrctl bclos'. Tlte cascrncrlt lrl(l [tcnctils.rrc r]'lorc pilrticularl!'
rlcscrillcd as 1'ollorvs:
All lantl included in "Gol{-l-tntrl" as dcscribed arrclrlcl'inccl irr thc IVlaslcr Dcclaration ol'
[)rotucti',,c Ciovenar:ts anrl lvlirstl)r I)cvclopnrcnt Cuirlclilrcs firr"lcton Springs Goll'& (.'astirrll
(llLrlr a.s Exlribit C and rccoxlctlrts lttsl.rurucnt No. l(r73(i2 in tltc lccords olTctorr ('ourrt\,. Itlalto-
. 'l'hu I:inal I)ltasc Ottc Subdivisiort Plat of 'l'eton Splings (ioll'ancl(la511r* C-lu[> as rcc:orr[:tlorr
licbruary 13,2001 rvitlt thc ol'licc ol'thc Clcrk ol'l-cton (l()unty, Idalro, clel'incs arrtldclincutcs tlrc
(ioll'Lancl rnore particularlv th:scribcd as Opcrt Sprrcc i\rcas l. f . 3, .1, 5, 6. ?,
(irautor. succL'ssors ancl assigrts. r.ltr also lr,;rcb.v convc\,, grant illld i ()r ilssign its intcrcst unlo (lnrrrlcc
tltc usc ol'arty and all easenlents provitlc<l lbr the use nrtd bcrrelit ol'tlrc (joll'Orvncr and Gull l.antl us
clcscribcrl in tlrc "Golf Course Play anclOpcrational llascnrcnt" as "l:xhibit F" irr thc iVlastcr I)cclirrnliorr
<ll'l)rotr:ctivc (lnvclrants and lvlastcr l)cvelol:nrcut Ciuidurlinss ltrr'l'cton Sprirrgs Ciol{'& (lastirrs ('ltr[).
(irantor'. !iuccossol's arrcl assigns. clo lirrthcr hcrc-Lry couvL'y, grant arrtl / or assign its iutcrcst uuto (irirrrtcc
tlrc usc ol'any ancl all eirsel'rlcnts provitlcrl lbr thc usc;tucl bcnclit ol'thc (ioll'Orvucr anrl Goll'[-irntl ls
clcscribcrl in thc War:'anty Dccd ill9l968 as rccorclccl otr Sclltcrutrur'27. 2007 bctrvccn 1'cron Sprilrgs
(ioll'irnrl (,'a.stirtg C'lub, LLC artcl'l'etort Splings [-lomeou,ncrs r\ssociutiou. Inc,
l)arccl l: Illock 29,"I'ract 4. \\/cll I-ot I. o1'Tcton Springs (iolf arrtlCasting Cllub. ['hasc -1.'l'uton
('trunty, Idaho, as pcr tltc plat lr:c()r(lc(l .lu11, 26. 100.1. irs Inslrrlnlcr)t No. 16240S.
l)arccl 2: 'h'act I(r,Wcll Lot I,ol"l'ct<-rnSpringsColl'altcl ('astintrlCllub, l)hasc4.l'clon('()unty.
Irlllro, as pcr thc plat rccortlcrl .lulv 26. 2004. as Instnr 08
:)
i\{ irr.shal l. Ivlanaging l)urtucr'l'cton Splinr-ls Cioll'& Casting. l-L('
Jorr Pi i. ivlanluing l)artr:cr'
'f cton alcr urttl Scrvcr C.'onrpiurl'. l-1.(
t-tarc _56kil-2, ln tr/1-11,
S'l';\Tl"i 0F IDAIIC)
['()tJN]'\', OF't'ETON
0n this I 1
SS
)
clay t)l' {-.'- i;}.' *-\:'t--.. 2014 , Llclitrc nrc. a N()tary I'uirlic in urrcl liu
Staic ol'lclaho. pcrsonally allpcarcrl tlte above slatcd Crantor, loro\r,r1 or idcntilicrl lo r:rc tu bc tlre: pcrs()r)
rvhr)sc nrunc is subscribcd to thc ',vitltin ilrstlunrcul and ilckrlowlcdgcd to ruc that IlLr cxccutcd thc saruc.
{-\-l*'-:-V
-- q... r\y-!i:1:---:.-
Nuro,y t'ulrli" *\< \-\..--, .- *_\.-
iVIy conrr:rissiolr cxpirus:-l -Zr-r - \L*,
I(csiding :rt: \-,, t \t*-v=) -- f=a-,3:li5S\ -\..
stlAilil0',1 It ri[ftlt00l{
N0i/tfiY PU0t.l0
SIAIE OT ITIAIIOt l)
Teton SPrings
Phase 1-4, Amend 1-9
a\195405 I ol(
ii
I
x
I
trEo2d-
,-{ a
o>7aEUvio.a<VIo0.ei
5Eotso1
0-
toJo6ZoU
ouZ
EL(n
Zot-hF
ri)J
!tfJoI
l,
oo
e
5o(9oozELozo
[dF
pI
HI
T
I
s
o
n
UJ
oo
E
I
^,Hil 2lu.,q EHCit
u Y565
6 s99&XhuPd
Bf;6Eg
E$EiE
EHfrE;
d PZfio
E:fiIItsuH-<qro<=
HE$iE
$Eq2
EHP
EiI
dr9*
Hi;
EIH
EEE
IXH
lJoo
FF<
E
z.d S,'.
W
fi I sE=tsElslRiE
8 IE Ei.E Eg
EIHEEiIt
HI!EEEEE
I
"l
sdl
H":E P
I:=!s iE5 !iE
;E3ir5eEgi;I;!
EI-Ef,EEEE,
HIf,[EHIEHiEt6XUtE99B
f;pooooooa
teilIh*
HIEiH,
fi|EE
.16 'ul0[
!rlr2
"l
I lrlll:3i; !i35 $:5
Y
2 tr tr
Y
5
tl eBrPSgP!99"
a
d z
I
6 d8 BSEE:l:stss p:B{8q
ggsgE
EaEai;rEBiEFaBPEEEEs9922tqEAEA
qeE
I
s -[:ii.3i'',I
6
3::HE'
Efl
*oc g
gPe E",gc^- EcZ eEEg
iE;!!EgHffE
:IIEEEEIEgH
s6-{iiE:8
;Heg
bEEr
G.
eg
Ei
bseb5i8
a
{S
! !gg=o
s silf;Ea
E EeegaiiXfgl
PBtB
EFs!zi
x,E
6cei.!J
988
CAfi
6EAc8E
EE
3
toreI
\
t o
I
s.!t
k
Lot,
@E
z!lxi"o6
El
2!!ti.
2,e
' \." - '----- ait . :__Si- iti-1 9:p
:,-9+
"i :11i: 'il.l It. '
ta
q
d
E
{
!E
I
I'
lll,llllll
Teton Springs
Phase 1-4, Amend 1-9
19s40s G "(X
t gcvcs NSdoNgdo,oof ssgccY atYal crlsnd
$
Eo:EEEE"!
ooEvE
d
vlpol!o:
=o
2UEozlrlz
oz
=oUJt!,
aG
ET
6Ee1
=L
EToloo
<ouo
d6
ooZ
E[Lozo
tdF
EoiEo:ei
E aex .g E
"!.!
Eo!
N
-E Eei
,!p
o:'a
o I@
@EEe:
o
:$
e
e,
E
!e:
ao
Ih
zaco
I
I
,/
Boi
c
o
o
o
E
o
r-EE*i
Y-
i*EE!
6
@
E
@
B
H
Yr B
aol a
l!
EE
;. Ec$
;
,"F'- /,i,,
al
&o
";
II
o(
,i'i, -r,l
i
E
E
E*
3:
aU
l
za
q
s
e
E
ib
/G\
\t?-/
!ei
o
I
o
A.f-afl
Ht,HEqxu
EEFaH:Ei
EqrailEES
UdiEEEE?
EEggrgiH
E
i *,i#
E;-!l!.
Eliiifi
a
ch
I
a
eE
,L.(,
T-:f]I etltq
I
Eo
b
F
o
ao
l
2EIo
t
qs
E'
Ei
IE
Er
5F
i
IBgr
t!
E
E
,1
Fi
Ef;Nf,it
rt
}IIIeE:t
qc
Ed
iEb8
i6BfE6EUaf,
i;rl_j
rd-
tq:;!!9{ Ig e!
/iielq!;iri:6r ttt;;r;E',q5e56
9e !
6-6
lBe
r! i
8t !.
l6,l35
'. 1
t
i
E
1I
I
i'
5
sIq
I
7
I
q
lg
:
+
o
o
0
o
f,
li
it
g
qf
:
tI
x
a
r€
I
o
o
It
3A
E!r!ot
8;ri
6
T
g
-'53
lItt
o
I
o
o
o
o
j
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
e
4
0
o
0
rc
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
lo
I
I
I
I
<o-s-t
t
I
I
o
o
o
o
o
e
0
o
t-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
t
o
4g;
=r>
ziExz
o
:
o
o
o
e
e
o
o
o
B
o
o
o
6)
a
B
o
I
o
o
rz<N!95So;i#9h;?S<?6
ofr
o
o
-lr:i.:
-
o
o
e
o
o
0
ooo
R2i:3i
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I+
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
Llai€
o
o
{
2
o
!t
i
I
-E
o
e
o
o
o
o
e
mi
A
otaozt
f;
c
??
;c
,6
i?
I
t."
o3i,
5o
{:i;
!3r
EEE
rEl
iEE
I:
e
;Ei i;r6EC8rc
TETON WATER AND SEWER CO., LLC
MAP TO ACCOMPANY TRANSFER APPLICATION
FOR CHANGE IN POINT OF DIVERSION
PLACES OF USE
AND POINTS OF DIVERSION
FOR WATER RIGHT 22-1317A A RENDEZVO US E NANEER'NG, P.C.
2rs@# 6losvffREsREs
1"r,,-q ,^,
lo'."'
tRaE?
lc: .--.
I
Et
st
I
!
!
3
5
I
I
I
I
I
,
i9
I
i
I
F.rst
RESPONSE TO IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
PRODUCTION REQUEST TO TETON SPRINGS WATER
Prepared by:
Jon Pinardi, Teton Springs Water and Sewer Company, Manager
Rick Nansen, Teton Water Inc. President, Contract Operator
Bob Ablondi, Rendezvous Engineering, Idaho P.8.5994
November 2, 201l
REQUEST NO. 1: In reference to Well No. 1, please respond to the following
a. How old is the pumping system (years)? Well No. 1 was
the spring of 2000 as an exploratory well and the first supply well for
the shallower
Apo'^a'* S
Q*&*o+*- ?'z's>
to/as lt1
hJe
-'1r'l O-i
feet) did not yield significant water production (< 20 gpm) and resulted in the
drilling of a much deeper (800 ft) bedrock well to provide the necessary supply.
The final completed well tapped a deeper and more substantial water source that
involved an unnamed fractured volcanic rock formation which although capable
of flows in excess of 500 gpm, has resulted in the discharge fine sediments when
pumped at rates higher than about 250 gpm. This deeper formation also produces
warm water (95-98F+/-) and exerts an artesian pressure that resulted in a static
water level of about 2 feet (below ground surface) at the time of completion.
The sediment is inherent to the fractured bedrock formation that supplies water to
this well and has over time accelerated the normal rate of wear and tear to the
submersible pump. A temporary pump was first installed in the well in 2000 to
supply water during the initial development and construction phase. A permanent
submersible pump and control building was constructed in early 2004 as the main
water system for the development was completed. However, the initial three
phase power service provided by the local power cooperative had loss of phase
and unbalanced voltage problems which caused a premature motor failure in late
2004. A new motor was installed in late 2004. New power lines were installed in
the Victor, Idaho area which eventually reduced electrical issues due to phase
failure and imbalance.
As the well use increased in2004 and 2005 with the growth of the Teton Springs
Development, there were additional sediment problems that resulted in a major
rehabilitation of Well No. I in late 2005 and early 2006. This included re-
development of the well with compressed air for about 4 full days to flush out
sediments that had accumulated in the bottom of the well over time. In addition,
a steel perforated liner was installed in the bottom 320 feet of the well. A new
pump end was also installed at this time. It is this same pump end and motor that
ir,rn
C)rnZrno
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 1 OCTOBER I9,2OII
Springs development. It was initially designed as an alluvial gravel
However, the upper zone of gravels (which were logged to a depth of
was recently replaced in 2011. Following this rehabilitation work, the well
continued to produce fine sediment for the first 3 to 4 minutes of operation during
each start-up. Although this situation has improved over time, fine sediment and
coloration is still observed when during the first few minutes of operation when
pumped at a high rate.
Although less than ideal, the well has produced good quality water in substantial
quantities over time and continues to serve as the major potable water source for
the development.
b. Please provide an assessment of why the pump/motor failed. The following is
a summary of the observed flows in Teton Springs Well No. 1 which led to the
concems about the well and the scheduling of maintenance work that took place
this past summer:
Early 2007 approximately 325 gpm on average
Early 2008 approximately 235 gpm on average
Early 2009 approximately 235 gpm on average
Mid 2009 approximately 235 gpm on average
Early 2010 approximately 200 gpm on average
Mid 2010 approximately 235 gpm on average
Late 2010 approximately 145 gpm on average
Early 201 1 approximately 180 gpm on average
Although pump failure due to ageldemand/usage is normal, it is believed that the
warm water associated with this formation (97 degrees) reduced the life
expectancy by the increasing the temperature of the motor windings and
accelerating the natural breakdown of the motor insulation. In addition as
previously described, this well was subject to sediment issues which caused
additional wear and tear on the pump end impellers, bearings and related parts.
It is also believed that the failure was caused by the breakdown of the plastic
electrical tape, commonly used by well drillers to attach the power wire to the
drop pipe. As the tape (more specifically, the adhesive) was broken down by the
long term exposure to warm water, it'osluffed off'and caused blockage of the
pump intake screen. This did not occur rapidly, but over time. This could not be
determined until the pump was pulled and visual inspection made. This condition
with the tape blocking the intake screen also helps explain the erratic flow rates
observed since 2007.
Over time, pump capacity was observed to diminish. This was not steady or
regular as noted in pump logs. After all of the "above ground" tests were
conducted, it was determined that there were some electrical issues. Upon
resolution of these items, there was no improvement in the well production. It was
therefore concluded that the pump/motor required an actual physical/visual
inspection.
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 2 ocToBER 19,2011
When the pump/motor assembly was pulled from the well, there was some tape
collected on the intake screen of the pump. This did not represent a complete
blockage. When pulled apart, the pump's physical rotation did not respond well
when operated (bearing failure, obvious physical abnormalities in the volute and
shaft). The motor had similar issues as the amperage draw exceeded
manufacturer's specifications. It appeared that the system had been operating
under severe intake restrictions at times. As the pumpimotor was pulled from the
well, it was noted that the tape was missing or falling off at various points.
While there may not have been enough tape on the intake screen to explain
pumping performance at that particular moment, it most likely was an important
factor.
After the installation of the new components, delivery was 500+ gpm on startup
and maintained approximately 350 gpm on continued operations. It was felt that
the well was repaired and operations could resume to normal, as such, Andrews
departed the site.
Unfortunately, within 24 hours, production diminished quickly upon pump
cycling and continued operation. As the pump came on, production was 350 gpm,
however, after twenty minutes, it dropped to 175 gpm and after 40 minutes to 130
gpm. The cause of diminished production was unknown, however, we felt that
either the tape issue was larger than originally suspected or there was possibly a
problem with the new pump or motor or a problem with the actual well or its
capacity. We contacted Andrews immediately to schedule a retum as quickly as
possible to re-pull the system and determine the problem.
When the new pump/motor was pulled again, the problem was confirmed.
Significant remaining tape in the well had created a blockage on the intake screen
sufficient to reduce capacities. It was determined that, most likely, the amount of
tape on the screen determined flow capacity at any given time. In addition, some
of the tape on the screen became perforated and allowed flow changes depending
on number of holes and actual blockage. It was believed that when the pump
would cycle off, some or all of the tape would fall off. When the pump cycled on,
the tape was picked up and accumulated on the screen creating the inconsistent
production patterns noted over time.
Now faced with the dilemma of an unknown amount of tape in the well, it was
decided to use compressed air to air lift the tape material out of the well casing,
similar to the process used in well drilling and development. A significant amount
of tape was expelled. It was then determined that this procedure should be
performed again in the future as pumping rates indicated or capacity diminished.
The new power wire was attached to the drop pipe with stainless steel strapping to
prevent a repeat occurrence.
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 3 OCTOBER 19,2OII
c. Please explain why the Company replaced both the pump and the motor
(Andrew Well Drilling Invoice No. Ql1-0605). Did both of them fail?
As stated previously, physical and electrical assessment of both components was
performed. The problem with the pump end was quite obvious as rotation was not
satisfactory. The motor was also replaced due to the lack of smooth rotation and
excessive amperage draw. Also given the age of the equipment (6 to 7 years old),
the cost to mobilize a service rig and pull the submersible pump and the
importance of this well to the operation of the system, the safest most prudent
decision was to install all new equipment.
d. Please explain whether the size and capacity of the pumping unit replaced
(gpm for the pump and hp for the motor) are of the same specification
compared to the size and capacity of the pumping unit recently installed. If
not, please explain the reason(s) why they are different.
The pump was replaced as originally specified in design. Availability and time
constraints were the determining factor of choice as to brand. However,
the same Goulds TCLC 40 hp pump and submersible motor, as was first installed
in the well in 2004, was reinstalled in 201I. See attached pump curve.
e. Please explain why the Company installed a new check valve. (Andrew Well
Drilling Invoice No. Ql1-0605).
A new check was installed due to the nature of repairs. While basic field test were
performed, failure was noted. Whether obstructions in the past had created failure
or some present obstruction existed, the device was not performing at an optimum
level and was replaced.
A new check valve was installed due to the nature of repairs. Failure was noted
during basic field tests. Whether obstructions in the past had created failure or
some present obstruction existed, we believed it had been compromised and
should be replaced. The costs of pulling the system again were also a factor.
Given the age of the check valve (originally installed in 2004) and potential cost
and impacts to pull the submersible pump in the event of a check valve failure, it
is common practice to replace this relatively inexpensive component as a
preventative maintenance measure when the opportunity arises.
As a note, we requested from Andrews to have as many components on-site as
possible for use during the repair period. Not all of the parts requested to be on-
site were used. Due to our rural setting and the timely availability of parts, this is
a prudent, normal and necessary practice to avoid extending the time-frame of
repairs. Adequate potable water supply and fire protection were of utmost
importance and the repair window was small. The electrical cable was aiso
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 4 ocToBER 19,2011
replaced as inspection noted chafing had occuned due to the loss of the tape and
the insulator had been compromised. While we may have attained more
operational time from the older components that were replaced, the failure of any
one of them in the near term would have caused loss of well operation.
f. Please provide a copy of the pump curves for the new and the replaced
pumping units. Attached is a pump curve for Well No. 1, Goulds 7 CLC 40 hp
The same model pump as was originally used in 2004 was reinstalled in 2011
REQUEST NO. 2: In reference to Well No.2, please respond to the following question.
a. How old is the pumping system (years). Well No. 2 was originally drilled in
late 2001 and early 2002 as a second exploratory well and backup supply for the
development. A well site was selected in the southeast corner of the project based
upon the recommendations of knowledgeable geologists to increase the potential
for a cold water well and to avoid some of the quality issues that occurred with
the first Teton Springs well. The well drilling targeted fracture zones within the
local underlying Madison Limestone bedrock. The well construction was not
finally completed until late 2003 when the final surface grout seal was installed.
Well No. 2 was drilled to a total depth of 1 140 feet and encountered limestone
from about 360 feet to the total depth of the well. However throughout the
drilling, only small quantities of water were observed as the encountered bedrock
was not highly fractured. The drilling took place over several months as work
took place in the winter and was prolonged due to the depth of the well. The well
was completed with a six inch steel liner through the entire depth from surface to
about 1050 feet. The bottom 90 feet (1050 to 1140) had collapsed or filled with
material at the time the liner was installed. The steel liner was perforated from
985 to 1045.
When the well was pump tested, it was apparent that it was able to produce water
at a higher rate (- 150 gpm) during the first few hours of the test, mostly due to
storage in the well casing and surrounding aquifer. However as the well was
pumped for a longer time period, the production rate diminished (to -75 gpm) as
the water level in the well drew down at a slow but steady rate. Because the well
was so deep and the static water was at about 40 feet (below ground surface) there
was large drawdown depth available, providing the opportunity to utilize the
available storage.
Well No. 2 was connected to the main distribution system at about the same time
that Well No.1 was completed in early 2004. At this time a 150 gpm pump
(Goulds 20 hp 5CHC) was installed to provide maximum capacity for short
durations. It was also the intention to use this well as a backup to Well # 1.
However, after gaining additional experience relative to the performance of this
well and the aquifer, it was determined the discharge valve on the well pump
piping had to be throttled to reduce the maximum pump output to about 75 to 80
gpm. A dedicated sounding tube was installed in this well in order to monitor the
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 5 ocroBER 19,20t1
drawdown in the well during operation. The same motor and pump equipment
remained in the well until recently replaced in 2011.
Although production is limited by conditions within the aquifer, Well No. 2 does
produce good quality cold water and is helpful in blending with the warn water
from Well No 1.
b. Please provide an assessment of why the pump/motor failed. The main cause
of failure was the long term exposure to over pumping conditions where the well
drew down the water level and caused the well pump to cavitate and pump air.
The shock of the air pumping affected both the motor with sudden increases and
decreases in motor amperage and pump end with mechanical shock caused by
rapid changes in pressure.
While the original inspection/replacement of #1 was occurring, Well #2wasthe
only source of water causing it to draw down further over time . As repairs
(previously mentioned) were being performed, we were operating at very high
demand levels in the subdivision. This required Well # 2 to operate continuously,
24 hours per day, for several days. When determined that Well #1 had to be
pulled again, there was no option other than continued use of Well #2.
We believe that during the required continuous operation of Well #2, the aquifer
was drawn down beyond its sustainable capacity. As the water level dropped to the
level of the pump intake, cavitation occurred, causing both pump and motor to fail.
No indication was noted during operation, other than the inability to start pump #2
after it had "kicked" off. Although the motor was protected by a Motor Savor unit
which is designed to sense a change in amperage, the repeated drawdown and shut
off of the pump and motor increased wear and tear over time. It was determined
that the Motor Saver circuit was functioning properly and a physical/visual
inspection of the pump and motor would be required. Said inspection revealed
failure of both motor and pump.
The long term use and observation of Well#2had determined that a smaller
capacity pump/motor would be a better fit for actual well conditions. When it was
noted that Well #2had failed, the opportunity arose to replace pump with a smaller
unit that would better fit the longer term production rate. Due to the size change,
both a new pump and motor was installed. All other components including power
wiring, electrical controls and piping remained the same.
c. Please explain why the Company replaced both the pump and the motor
(Andrew Well Drilling Invoice No. C-5045). Did both of them fail?
As stated, the pump was changed to meet the actual aquifer conditions. Soundings
were performed and well depths were noted and demonstrated that the wells was
not to be able to support the 20 hp pump. The 7.5 hp design would maintain
maximum sustainable flows without causing drawdown concerns as had occurred
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 6 ocToBER 19,2011
with the 20hp system. In summation; the previous 150 gpm flows @ Well #2werc
too much for the present aquifer. The current 70-90 gpm by the 7.5 hp system was
performed while noting drawdown @peak usage. This level is sustainable with
this pumpingrute.
d. Please explain whether the size and capacity of the pumping unit replaced
(gpm for the pump and hp for the motor) are of the same specification
compared to the size and capacity of the pumping unit installed. If not, please
explain the reason(s) why they are different. The sizing was reduced to meet
actual current aquifer capacity of Well # 2. As previously discussed, this well had
a history of lower production rates when it was required to operate for sustained
time periods. Also, given that this well generated water from deep bedrock
sources, the potential to enhance flow from this well was limited. The smaller
capacity pump will also enable this well to operate at a more efficient and
productive level when pumped on a sustained basis.
e. Please explain why the Company installed a new check valve. (Andrew Well
Drilling Invoice No. C-5045). As previously mentioned, if there was any doubt
about a component, it was most prudent to replace rather than request another
service call to pull the pump. Field tests showed seepage during testing. Also given
the depth of the pump setting and age of the equipment, the replacement of the
check valve was done as a preventative maintenance action.
f. Please provide a copy of the pump curves for the new and the replaced
pumping units. Attached are both the original pump curve (20 hp, Goulds
5CHC) and replacement pump curve (7.5 hp, Goulds 5RWAL).
REQUEST NO.3: The Company indicated that the pumps failed in July and August20ll.
Application, page 2. It is Staffs understanding that both pumping units were
installed approximately at the same time when the water system was
developed. Please provide an explanation or your theory as to why both
systems failed almost at the same time.
For clarification, both pumping units were not installed at the same time as
explained above.
As explained in Request #1, because of the steadily declining output of Well #1
over time and dramatic reduction seen in late 2010, we planned to have the
pump/motors pulled for a review of the problem and corrective action taken as
necessary. We believed that the reduced production of this well not only put our
customers supply at risk during high demand periods or if another problem
occurred, but also put undo hardship on well #2. We planned for this work to be
done in the spring of 2011 before summer demand occurred. Due to vendor
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 7 OCTOBER T9,2O1I
availability, however, we could not schedule the work until late June to July. This
did not give us cause for concem as all other systems were operating normally.
In planning for the initial work on #1 to be completed, we verified well #2 was
operating normally and we had a full 500,000 reservoir, therefore, we anticipated
no problems.
At the time well #1 was offline for the initial repairs, the reservoir was drawn
down from 25 feet to 14 feet. Had the initial repairs gone as planned, #1 would
have come back on line at full capacity and, with#2, replenished the reservoir and
all systems would have been normal. However, when #1 failed to operate at
capacity, the combined output of both wells was able to maintain only about 18
feet in the reservoir. Although not ideal, we believed this was an adequate
reservoir level provided we could identify and repair the problem with well #1
relatively soon.
We were in communication with Andrews Well Drilling and Rendezvous
Engineering about scheduling their return to do a drawdown test on well #1 and/or
to pull the new pump and motor to determine the production problem.
At this precise time, while awaiting the retum to assess well #1, well #2 ceased
operating. Regular pump re-start protocols were ineffective and we immediately
moved into emergency operations due to the already partially depleted reservoir
and inability of well #1 to re-fill the reservoir or keep up with demand.
We immediately contacted Pump-Tech to assess well #2. It was our hope that it
was something in the motor-saver circuit, electrical or control panels. Upon their
arrival and testing, it was determined that everything'oabove-ground" was
operating normally, that the problem was in the well with the pump and/or motor.
As mentioned, we had been in communication with Andrews and they were trying
to arrange to get their equipment back to Teton Springs as quickly as possible.
With this new development, not only did we need to pull#1 again, we needed to
pr:Jl #2. Andrews agreed to return immediately and we went about emergency
repairs to avoid a loss of water service and/or fire suppression service to all of the
customers of the utility.
As indicated in both Request #1 and Request #2,the reason for the failures were
different. It is our belief that there is no direct correlation between the failure of
the 2 wells, it was a coincidence and happened at the worst possible time. The
heavy demand and fact that Well #2had to operate on a more continuous basis
while Well # 1 was either compromised or taken out of service for repairs was,
however, one factor interconnecting the timing of the failures. The timing gave us
no other options than to enact immediate repairs with known vendors (Andrews
Well Drilling, Pump-Tech, Rendezvous Engineering, Teton Water Inc.) who had
serviced our system since the time of their original installations.
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 8 ocToBER t9,2011
REQUEST NO. 4: Please provide any design information concerning the selection and
sizing of the horsepower requirements for both the original pumping units in
Well Nos. I and 2 (i,e. flow rate, discharge pressure, pumping water depth,
etc.).
Each of the well pumps was selected using available drawdown information
(developed during the drilling of the wells) and a WaterCAD computer model of
the entire distribution system for Teton Springs. In both cases, the quantity of flow
was determined by the expected yield of the well with efforts focused on
maximizing production for the growing development. The pump discharge head
was determined by the 1) piping within the distribution system ,2) tank elevation
and 3) well pumping level. The piping and tank elevation were well established by
the need to provide minimum fire flows and desired system pressures as
determined by the elevation of the above ground storage tank. The pumping levels
were however variable and changed with the rate of flow, length of pump
operation and time of the year. In addition, water levels in WellNo.2, because of
its very low specific capacity (output in gpm per foot of drawdown), are also
believed to be affected by annual precipitation trends. The following table
summarizes the main design criteria for the two wells both in the original design
and for the recent 2011 pump installation.
1. Pumping level varies with the rate of pumping and duration of pump run.
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 9
Original Design Criteria 2011 Design Criteria
Well No. I No.2 No. 1 No.2
Pump
Goulds
7CLC,40
hp
Goulds
5CHC,20
hp
Goulds
7CLC,40
hp
Goulds
sRWAL, 7.5
hp
Static Water Level, ft 5 35 5 60
Average Yield, gpm 300 13s 300 70
Pumping Levelt@
Average Yield, ft 1 81 218 1 8 1 132
Well Ground Elevation,
ft 629s 6335 6295 6335
Total Dynamic Head at
Pump, ft (tank at20 feet,
tank bottom elevation:6470)
398 398 398 286
ocToBER t9,20ll
REQUEST NO. 5: Please provide any information concerning frequency of pump cycling
in Well Nos. I and,2.
The two wells operate with a radio telemetry system which monitors the pump
operation at both well sites and the nominal 500,000 gallon storage tank level
using a submersible transducer. This above ground welded steel tank has a
maximum inside water level of 23.5 feet (overflow elevation) and an inside
diameter of 60.0 feet which equates to a water volume of about 21,130 gallons per
foot (allowing for intemal supports and piping) and maximum total water volume
of 496,555 gallons . The wells are currently programmed come at a level of about
20.5 feet (measured from the bottom) and turn off at a level of abofi22.0 feet
Based upon these settings there is minimum of about gallons between the pump on
and off levels and minimum of about 3I,695 gallons between the start and stop
levels. The current maximum summer time daily use is in the range of about
230,000 gpd. The peak hour demand is estimated to be about 2.0 the maximum day
flow or about or about 320 gpm. At this estimated peak hour flow rate the
minimum cycle time (time to filI and time to empty) between pump starts would be
approximately 726 minutes or 12.1 hours. Over a 24hour period, this would result
in about 2 pump starts per day. During off season conditions, water use drops to
less than 50,000 gpd and estimated peak hour flows to about 70 gpm resulting in a
cycle time between pump start and stop of abofi 562 minutes or 9.4 hours.
REQUEST NO. 6: Please provide any information concerning changes in the pumping
conditions (i.e. pumping water levels, operating or discharge pressures, etc.)
for Well Nos. L and 2 from the time they were put into service until their
failure.
There were no known changes in the pumping or operating conditions for Well
No. 1. This pump failure was caused by the accelerated wear and tear caused by
the warm water conditions associated with the fine sediment generated by the
fractured rock formation water source. Although there were no changes made to
well No. 2,the static water level appears to have dropped over time as use of the
well has increased.
REQUEST NO. 7: Please provide an explanation and documentation
(competitive bid documents, selection process, work contracts, etc.) showing
that cost control efforts have been applied in repairing the pump/motor units
for Well Nos. 1 and2.
Regarding bids and proposals, in our rural setting and given our history of
operations, we are aware of the resources within our area. Our chief operator,
Teton Water Inc., is also a chief operator of multiple other systems in our area and
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 10 OCTOBER 79,2OII
thus, their operation, maintenance and budgets. He considered the following in
advising Teton Springs Water & Sewer on actions relative to these repairs:
. Health and Safety
. Our remote location
. The depth of the wells and requirement for large equipmento Available Regional contractors/suppliers and parts
. Engineer availability and expertise
o Manager's notification and approvalo Water supply was finite and being depleted at a time of high demand
o Response times of all contacted and their immediate availabilityo Cost discipline
o Customer service
Both Teton Water Inc., and Rendezvous Engineering work with many entities in
our area and possess a sizeable pool of resources with which they regularly
communicate on different projects. If someone knows of a new contractor or
supplier to enter our area, it is readily known to them. They procure pricing, on a
regular basis, for materials and labor and assure that their clients get the best value
for their investment.
Andrews was chosen for a variety of reasons. They had drilled the original well
and knew of its issues and history. They had also provided the submersible pump
and motor and had performed past rehabilitation work and would be prepared to
respond to any unforeseen issues.
Further, Andrews was the only company that responded in a timely manner and
their proposed time, rate schedule and availability was acceptable. In fact, no
other vendor responded to Teton Water Inc.'s RFQ within the first 48 hours and
further responses were indicative of no interest or no staff or equipment
availability. No written requests were made as a result, nor was one made with
Andrews other than the work proposal.
Regarding pricing, while Andrews was securing material and supplies pricing,
Teton Water was doing the same throughout the Rocky Mountain Region (Salt
Lake City, Denver, Missoula, Casper, Billings, etc.) When Andrews prices were
quoted, Teton Water compared them with those they had procured and gave
management the results. In all cases, Andrews was within a 50h margin of the
pricing Teton Water had solicited and was lower on most due to their buying
power with their suppliers.
Throughout the entire process, Teton Water Inc. was regularly on-site and in
communication with those vendors who knew our systems well; Rendezvous
Engineering, Andrews, Pump-Tech and the Teton Springs Water & Sewer
Company owner representative, Jon Pinardi. All activities were discussed between
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 1l ocToBER l9,20ll
the appropriate parties and final decisions were made to ensure that water service
was not lost to the customers of the utility.
For the record, had we not pursued the sequence of events to enact the repairs
during the emergency operation period, it is highly probably that our water supply
would have been depleted and water service to the customers negatively affected.
We were confident that, at peak capacity, well #2 could not replenish the reservoir
nor could it keep up with expected continued demand. Had we not re-pulled #1
immediately after repairing #2,itis highly probable that within 12-24 hours, the
remaining water in the reservoir would be depleted and our water supply would be
severely curtailed to the customers. Every effort was enacted to minimize threats
to public health, safety and fire concerns while also minimizing current and future
costs and obtaining the best value for ongoing operation of the system. During this
emergency period, pursuing new vendors and/or a competitive bid process would
have been disastrous.
REQUEST NO. 8: In reference to Invoice No. 228 from Teton Water, Inc. dated
811812011, please provide a more detailed explanation of the various tasks
included in the invoice such as Operations September, Well repair opso Well
No. 2 monitoring ops and flushing. Please provide justification as to why the
costs of these tasks were included as part of the emergency work and not part
of the regular operating expenses for the Company.
The following information was prepared by Mr. Rick Nansen, President of Teton
Water, Inc in response to questions about invoice No. 228:
I, Rick Nansen, am a sub-contractor and supply the requirements of the contract.
As President of Teton Water, Inc., I was to facilitate the completion of required
repairs and maintain ongoing operations.
. Operations September- S1000 - Basic retainer for month of August
including (15 hours @$7}lhour) of basic operation of systems, reporting and
testing as required. This is my base contracted fee with Teton Springs. First 15
hours were used rapidly in assessment, response, site management and acquisition
of resources. Five days (approximately three hours per day). This was used then
the following occurred.
o Well repair ops- t hours @ $7Olhour. Specific hours towards well #1.
Three days ( three hours per day X three days) Round the clock monitoring of
SCADA included but not billed.
o Well monitoring#Z11 hours (approximately 1.5 hours per day for 7 days)
pump, record and assess drawdown. Required for analysis and assessment of
operation and production of Well #2. (lt was noted during the sixth day that well
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER t2 ocToBER 19,2011
#Zhadfailed and repairs were required). Information was vital to the final
decision for downsizing pump size.
o Flushing2T hours (4 days @ approximately 7 hours per day). Due to the
required flushing of well #1 (tape), the aquifer was rather "stirred up". This well
historically produces sediments when operating close to max capacity. The
flushing of the well exacerbated this. This remedy created an exceptionally large
amount of sedimentation. The system was then methodically flushed for 4 days
after the aforementioned event. This was done zone by zone to assure water
quality and minimize any sediment, taste and odor complaints. Much of this was
done after completion of all repairs, though some was done in close proximity of
well #1, when it was intermittently put back on line.
These reported hours occurred and accrued over a ten day stretch. While not listed
day specific, I was very conservative in my billing practice, as Teton Springs has
been client for many years. I was on site throughout this time slot for 12-16 hours
per day, making the best possible use of resources, including my own. While
being on site and performing my duties for some 140 hours+ , for 12 days, I billed
only 62,less than half my normal rate. I performed all the aforementioned duties
during the times I was not on the phone (management, engineers, contractors,
suppliers, customers, etc.) or assisting others in the completion of repairs. I also
went door to door and notified customers throughout the affected areas, both
before and after repairs were made.
REQUEST NO. 9: In reference to Invoice No. 8762 from Rendezvous Engineering dated
8l3ll20ll, please provide a more detailed explanation of the various tasks
included in the invoice such as drawing for the proposed Well No.3 and
discussions with Mr. Bob Ablondi on various issues. Please provide
justification as to why the costs of these tasks were included as part of the
emergency work and not part of the regular operating expense for the
Company.
For clarification, you will note that the $85.00 charge on invoice #8762
referencing well #3 is not included in this application for assessment. Below is
Mr. Ablondi's description of the work performed within that amount relative to
the repairs to wells #1 and #2 duringthe time in question:
A total of 5.5 hours was spent by Idaho registered engineer, Robert T. Ablondi,
(P. E. 5994) discussing well purnp options and equipment with the Roger
Buchanan with Andrew Well Drilling Services and Rick Nansen, system operator;
reviewing pump curves and equipment; and, inputting updated information into
the WaterCAD computer model to analyze various pump options and
performance within the overall system. This work was done to verify that the
proper well pump equipment was utilized and to assist where possible in
determining the cause and factors affecting the failure of the well pumps.
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
TETON SPRINGS WATER 13 OCTOBER 19,2011