Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20091211FLS to Staff 48-54.pdfFALLS WATER COMPANY 2180 N Deborah Dr, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 Website: ww.fallswater.com Tel.: (208) 522-1300 Fax: (208) 522-4099 RECEI D 20090EC II PH 2= 06 December 10, 2009 Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington Street PO Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 TkrrEnclosed are one (1) original and seven (7) copies of the Company's response to the 8eeei: Production Request for case no. FLS-W-09-1. Also enclosed is a CD disk electronic versions of the Excel files referenced in the response. If you need anything else, please, let me know what you need. Thank you,k~~ K. Scott Bruce General Manager Falls Water Company, Inc. Enclosures K. Scott Bruce Falls Water Company, Inc. 2180 North Deborah Dr Idaho Falls, ID 83401 TeL. (208) 522-1300 Fax (208) 522-4099 E-mail: scott1(§fallswater.com Representative for Falls Water Co., Inc. REC;:¡L..d 2009 DEC 11 PH 2: 06 r~ BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF FALLS WATER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO FALLS WATER COMPANY CASE NO. FLS-W-09-1 Falls Water Co., Inc. hereby submits the following responses to the first production request of the commission staff. The records are held by Falls Water Co., Inc. in their main office located at 2180 North Deborah Dr, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401. Scott Bruce is the contact person for the records and can be reached at (208) 522-1300. Scott Bruce, General Manager, wil be the witness who can sponsor answers at hearing for the responses to the production requests unless noted differently in the response. REQUEST NO. 48. In reference to the Company's response to Request No.2, the table of water testing costs shows tests are conducted for Well Nos. 1, 5, 8, 9 and well field. Staff notes that the Company also owns and operates Well Nos. 2, 3,4 and 6. Please explain why these wells do not have costs for water source testing. Response to Request No. 48 Response prepared by Scott Bruce, General Manager. Witness at hearing wil be Scott Bruce. The well field referenced in the response to Request NO.2 consists of wells 2, 4, and 6. Because of the close proximity of these wells and the consistent sample results from the wells, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality classified them to be a well field in 2003. 1 The use of well no. 3 was discontinued in March of 2006. Power was disconnected and the well was capped. The 2006 annual report completed by the Company reported no production for well no. 3 in that year and the well was not reported on in subsequent annual reports. REQUEST NO. 49. The Company is proposing to use the 2008 excess water usage data for various classes of customers in estimating the expected test case revenue (presented in Exhibit 5 of the Application and Estimated Revenue tab of the Company's Worksheet). Please provide justification why the 2008 excess water usage data was used in the calculation rather than normalized excess usage values. Response to Request No. 49 Response prepared by Scott Bruce, General Manager. Witness at hearing will be Scott Bruce. At the time the application was prepared the Company felt that the 2008 usage by customers was most representative of the actual excess usage by metered customers. The fact that unmetered customers were being converted to metered customers over the years of 2006 through 2008 would not give the best data for average residential customer usage.. Applicant believes that an adjustment to "normalize" excess usage would require a detailed bill frequency analysis to produce a reasonable proxy for "normalized customer use. The Company does not currently have the necessary computer software to generate an appropriate data base to perform such an analysis. The Company is conferring with its biling software supplier to see if a report generator can be developed that would enable the Company to perform such an analysis in the future. The enclosed Excel spreadsheet "Response to Request No. 49" provides an analysis of excess usage by customer by month for the years 2006 through 2008. It also includes the data for excess usage for 2009. This spreadsheet was developed to be responsive to Staffs request. It is based upon averages that are of course skewed in both directions by both low and high use individual customers. The results are also tainted by the Company's metering program that has eliminated flat rate customers. Applicant does not believe the use of these skewed averages is appropriate and therefore used actual test year consumption data in its application. Correcting for the skewed data would require the above mentioned bil frequency analysis with all customers metered. The three year average shows the average annual residential customer excess usage to be 40,037,000 gallons greater than the 2008 excess usage. If 2009 data is included in the average, the average annual residential customer excess usage drops to be 14,646,000 gallons greater than the 2008 excess usage. The 2009 data includes the addition of 60 active residential accounts during 2009. The unmetered customers, who were metered during 2006 through 2008, live on small lots and the excess usage is going to be less and will bring the average excess usage down over time. Starting with 2009 data the average excess usage data should be more representative of the customers' average excess use because every account is now metered in the system. 2 For the multi-family residential customers the three and four year averages are both 2,000,000 gallons less than the 2008 excess use number. The averaged number would be more representative of this class because the customers have been metered and the meters read monthly for many years. For the commercial customers, the three and four year averages are not truly representative of the actual excess use per customer. The commercial class has about 25% of the customers (ie. convenience stores, gravel pit, churches, schools, and subdivision entrance watering) whose average monthly use is 100,000 gallons or more. The other 75% of the customers use about 1,000 to 5,000 gallons per month. Most commercial customers added to the system are small use customers. The 2008 excess use for commercial customers is 106,000 gallons more than the average excess usage for 2007 to 2009. REQUEST NO. 50. Please explain who prepared the bid documents and project specification for the construction of the major components of the Well NO.9 such as: (a) well construction and development; and (b) construction of well house, mainline tie-in, pumps, etc. Response to Request No. 50 Response prepared by Scott Bruce, General Manager. Witness at hearing wil be Scott Bruce. The bid documents and project specification for the construction of the major components of the Well NO.9 which included well construction and development and construction of well house, mainline tie-in, pumps, etc. were prepared by Schiess and Associates Consulting Engineers, 4103 South 45th West, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402. The documents were approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, through whom the financing for the project was obtained. REQUEST NO. 51. The Schiess & Associates 2004 Engineering Study recommended that the Company develop the lona Road Well and the Crowley Road Well to improve system pressures and keep supply in pace with demand; (References: July 19, 2004 and June 25, 2004 letters to Falls Water Co., Attachment 13, Company response to Request No. 26). However, the Company developed Well NO.9 which is located in Deborah Road. Please explain why the well was sited at a different location than that recommended in the study. Response to Request No. 51 Response prepared by Scott Bruce, General Manager. Witness at hearing wil be Scott Bruce. Well NO.9 was built on Deborah Drive for the following reasons: 3 1. Schiess and Associates, who did the studies (References: July 19, 2004 and June 25, 2004 letters to Falls Water Co., Attachment 13, Company response to Request No. 26), were consulted about the Deborah Drive site and their recommendation was that it was a beneficial site for the new welL. 2. The Company was unable to obtain a viable well site on lona Road that would lend itself to future construction of water storage on site as suggested by the more comprehensive study of the water system that was completed by Schiess and Associates in October 2006. 3. The main line infrastructure in place around the Deborah Drive lot provides a much better distribution of the wells production into the water system with little or no additional main line installation other that the main line tie-in for the well itself. The existing main lines would also allow the disbursement of future volume when a two milion gallon storage tank is added to the site in the future. 4. The existing well site on Crowley Road was not large enough to allow for future water storage on the site and attempts to purchase adjacent land to provide enough land for future storage were unsuccessfuL. 5. The site at Deborah Drive is across Ammon Road from the Company's Well NO.5. This makes the Deborah Drive site ideal for future water storage infrastructure. Both Well No. 5 and Well NO.9 can be piped into the future storage tank with minimal main line costs. REQUEST NO. 52. The engineer's estimate for the construction and development of Well NO.9 was $223,050 (Attachment 24, Company Response to Request No. 34). Staff notes that the lowest bid to construct and develop the well was $114,285 and was awarded to Andrew Well Driling Services, Inc. for a total contract price of $114,285 based on the original project specification. However, the final cost in completing the construction and development of Well NO.9 was $282,843.63, a cost overrun of approximately 147%. Please explain these discrepancies. Response to Request No. 52 Response prepared by Scott Bruce, General Manager. Witness at hearing will be Scott Bruce. When drilling a well many details of the geology are unknown. Through drilling and development of the well the specific challenges of the project become known and can then be properly addressed. The construction of Well NO.9 was not without its challenges. As with any project of this type it is always hoped to maximize the production for the money spent. Listed below are the change orders for the project along with copies of the change orders approved by the project engineer, Schiess and Associates, the well driler, Andrews Well Driling, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality engineer, and the Company's representative. 4 Attachment 33 is a copy of Change Order NO.1 for an additional $16,396.08. The test well was authorized to be deepened to approximately 420 feet in order to ascertain the potential to maximize the production of the welL. Attachment 34 is a copy of Change Order NO.2 for an additional $45,669.55. Authorization was given to deepen the production well in order to capture water residing in a gravel layer at approximately 400 feet and to develop the aquifer at that level by use of a stainless steel screen. Attachment 35 is a copy of Change Order NO.3 for an additional $100,292.71. The well is not usable for potable water production unless the sand production in the well is 5 parts per million (ppm) or less. Development of the well to reduce the sand content did not go as well as hoped. The broken basalt layer was producing more sand than expected. Multiple processes were used to ultimately seal out this sand problem. Before sealing the problem layer out the production capacity of the well at 5 ppm or less sand was only 850 gpm. The production capability of the well as finished is 3,000 gpm or over 3.5 times the production before the problem sandy layer was sealed. Attachment 36 is a copy of Change Order NO.4 for an additional $6,200.28 for final quantity corrections for project closeout. The total of the four change orders is $168,558.62 which brought the total costs for drilling and developing the well to a total of $282,843.63. The Company feels that the additional production capacity that resulted has allowed the Company to be prepared to meet the demand of our customers. The lease for Well NO.8 is in its final year. If the lease is unable to be renewed (the owner of the well has changed since the lease began), the company wil be unable to meet production demands through the wells it owns without well NO.9. REQUEST NO. 53. Please provide the data (tables) presented in response to Production Request No. 39,40,42 and 44 in executable electronic Excel format (tables in CD). Response to Request No. 53 Response prepared by Scott Bruce, General Manager. Witness at hearing wil be Scott Bruce. The Excel file "Response to Request No. 53/1 contains the requested information and is on the enclosed CD. REQUEST NO. 54. Exhibit 5 of the Company's Application uses 3,593 total number of customers (residential=3,460, multi-family residential=71, commercial=62) in estimating expected revenues using the Company's proposed rates. However, in response to Request No. 41, the Company indicated a total number of customers at the end of the 2008 test year was 3,585 (residential=3,426, multi-family 5 residential=83, commercial=76). Please explain the discrepancies and why the Company proposes to use 3,593 total number of customers. Response to Request No. 54 Response prepared by Scott Bruce, General Manager. Witness at hearing will be Scott Bruce. The Applicant's billing system has no report function that tabulates the active accounts. The active accounts are tabulated using a report that lists all billings for the month and designates terminated customers and disconnected services. The disconnected and terminated services are hand tabulated and deducted from the total number of accounts. Multi-family and commercial accounts must be hand tabulated also. The numbers for Exhibit 5 in the application were tabulated using the report dated June 30, 2009. In reviewing the information on this report, tabulation errors were discovered. The customer numbers by class for Exhibit 5 should be residential=3,424, multi-family residential=82, commercial=67 for a total of 3,569 total number of customers. One additional problem not taken into account by using the June 30, 2009 report was the number of disconnected services would be different from the December 31, 2008 report. This would account for the differences of total customers by class and the total number of active customers. The numbers presented in the response to Request No. 41 are corrected as follows: Customer Class 2006 2007 2008 Active Unmetered Residential 381 161 4 Active Metered Residential 2676 3140 3420 Active Multi-Family Residential 77 79 82 Active Commercial 52 63 67 The more accurate customer numbers by class would be the numbers calculated from the December 31, 2008 report which are residential=3,424, multi-family residential=82, commercial=67 for a total number of 3,569 customers. Dated at Idaho Falls, Idaho, this 10th day of December 2009. Respectfully submitted, FALLS WATER COMPANY, INC.K~~ K. Scott Bruce, Manager 6 Date of Issuance:3-J. -c!7 Change OrderNo. / Effective Date: Dttk ¿tJIJ",er SI~=,',1~"'t: Project: New Well NO.9 Contract: New Well NO.9 lowner: Falls Water Company Owners Contact No.: 04192 Contractor: Andrew Well Drilling Services, Inc DaleofC~: Ll4:11 ? _.i. '2"'i Engineer's Project No.: 04192 The Contract Documents are modified as follows upon execution of this Change Order: Descrption: ScJfAl¿:& wa eKf~.. 4/1,.. krl ¿;¿~ t- l-z. fee :t. ?tls dt,,""c. o,.4rc 4K'n'f ~"lkelllk. ~1J¿'+:4l6..~S' ¡ltd!! .¡ 1JC(." Ivl.l #v . Dvd,i"", fè(. n.k 1u,"1 ét 4JhiS'lr/ IH iiMJ". ~~e. ø.,,. p.f.. M wtll is. 1~J\ents: (List documents supporting change): . ~ c.""P~7'. · ~~ .¡..IIM'l!1 ¿lMJ. .tlJ,...tf6.~T $~,-, J~~"'$e-s .."t ~ ff"t,'r IJ"l'r I~r U Of' ¡Jrlct.! . . Sdt14$ c:"i.us4T ø+ Atr- Sf;¿-uf ~ CL-,L OI ;r.._..,.1' .lJï-qt: CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Original Contract Price: $ //~êfJS",oo CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Onginal Contract Times: 0 Working days ~ Calendar days Substantial completion (days or date): 40 Ready for final payment (days or date): 3D (Increase) (Decrease) from previously approved Change (Increase) (Decrease) from previously approved Change OrdersOrders No. 1141 to No. 12,. No. r'A to No. 11 "' Substantial completion (days): $t1¿A Ready for final payment (days): DA. tl4L Contract Price prior to this Change Order: $-- ;Jß'f DO Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial completion (days or dale): Ready for final payment (days or dale): 1d4: U 2.IJ 7 ;Tun.l ~ 7¡ 2407 (lcrea;'fEeCleaseJ of this Change Order: $ i~, '3 'lti. 08r . ~(DeCrease) of this Change Order: n- Substantial completion (days 4 date): /'1 ~) :J "'ttL 1/,2007 Ready for final payment ~ date): ::i. l. II, 2.ÐÐ 7 Contract Price incorporating this Change Order: $/30, "91. &8, Contract Times with all approved Change Orders: Substantial completion €5or daie): ''3'1 Ready for final payment (~date): "20 RECOMMENDED: ACCE By: fi H~S,~_BY: Engineer (Authorized Signature) ~ Dale: .3 -2: - 07 Dale: \. ¿) ...""by,-,""',._" ~ ACCKED: . . By: .~Hìý.~ l (o.uthorized Signature) Dale:2. -;;-¿:7 ,3-5"-07Dale: E.JCDC No. C-94\ (2002 Edition) Prepared by the Engineers' Joint Contract Documents Committee and endorsed by the Associated General Contractors or America and the Construction Specifcations Institute. Page 0 of2 Attachment 33 Fa l l s W a t e r C o m p a n y We l l N o . 9 Co n t r a c t N o . 0 4 1 9 2 - 1 Ch a n g e O r d e r S u m m a r y Co n t r a c t o r : No t i c e t o P r o c e e d D a t e : An d r e w W e l l D r i l i n g 01 1 2 9 / 0 7 Cu m Cu m Su b s t a n t i a l Fi n a l Co n t r a c t Co n t r a c t Co n t r a c t Co n t r a c t Co m p l e t i o n Co m p l e t i o n Da t e Am o u n t Am o u n t Ti m e Ti m e Da t e Da t e Or g i n a l C o n t r a c t 11 2 9 1 2 0 0 7 $ 11 4 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 $ 11 4 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 12 0 12 0 Ma y 28 , 20 0 7 Ju n e 2 7 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n g e O r d e r 1 31 2 2 0 0 7 $ 16 , 3 9 6 . 0 8 $ 13 0 , 6 8 1 . 0 8 14 13 4 Ju n e 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 Ju l y 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n g e O r d e r 2 Ch a n g e O r e r 3 Ch a n g e O r e r 4 Ch a n g e O r e r 5 To t a A p p r o v e d C h a n g e O r d e r s $ 1 6 , 3 9 6 . 0 8 .i Sc h i e s s & A s s o c i a t e s EN G I N E E R I N G . P L A N N I N G . LA N D S U R V E Y I N G Fa l l s W a t e r C o m p a n y We l l N o . 9 Co n t r a c t N o . 0 4 1 9 2 - 1 Ch a n g e O r d e r 1 Q u a n t i t y A d j u s t m e n t a n d N e w L i n e I t e m s Co n t c t r : A n d r e W e l l D r i l i n g s Sc h i e s s & A s s o c i a t e s EN G I N E E R I N G , P L A N N I N G ' L A N D S U R V E Y I N G Ch a n g e O r d e r # 1 q u a n t i t y Re v i s e d q u a n t i t i e s a n d Sc h e d u l e o f V a l u e s ad j u s t m e n t a n d c o s t co s t Sc h e d u l e i - T e s t W e l l Ex t e n d e d Ex t e n d e d Ex t e n d e d No . It e m Un i t Es t . O t v Un i t P r i c e Pr i c e Es t . O t y Pr i c e Es t . O t y Pr i c e 1 Te s t W e l l M o b i l z a t i o n LS 1 $1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0. 6 7 $1 , 0 0 5 . 0 0 1. 6 7 $2 , 5 0 5 . 0 0 2 8 i n c h c a s i n g LF 50 $2 3 . 0 0 $1 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 12 1 $2 , 7 8 3 . 0 0 17 1 $3 , 9 3 3 . 0 0 3 8 i n c h d r i l i n g i LF 10 0 $1 8 . 0 0 $1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 27 5 $4 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 37 5 $6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 4 6 i n c h c a s i n g i LF 15 0 $1 7 . 0 0 $2 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 23 4 $3 , 9 7 8 . 0 0 38 4 $6 , 5 2 8 . 0 0 5 6 i n c h d r i l i n g LF 20 0 $1 7 . 0 0 $3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 90 $1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 29 0 $4 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 6 5 i n c h c a s i n o ( i f n e c e s s a r y ) LF 30 0 $1 2 . 0 0 $3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 .3 0 0 -$ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 7 5 i n c h d r i l l n g LF 20 $1 7 . 0 0 $3 4 0 . 0 0 .2 0 .$ 3 4 0 . 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 8 Ab a n d o n T e s t W e l l LS 1 $1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 0. 8 3 3 4 $1 , 0 0 . 0 8 1. 8 3 3 4 $2 , 2 0 0 . 0 8 To t a l o f B i d S c h e d u l e i $1 5 . 5 4 0 _ 0 0 .. . . . ' ! n ~ n . . .. _ - - - $3 0 . 0 0 $3 2 . 0 0 $1 , 4 1 0 . o o i $3 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $5 , 0 9 0 . 0 0 $3 1 , 9 3 6 . 0 8 J $ 1 6 , 3 9 6 . 0 8 ~ Sc h e d u l e i + C 0 1 R e v i s e Q u a n t i t i e s a n d E s t m a t e d A m o u n t Ne t I n c r e a s e o f S c h e d u l e 1 + C 0 1 ~ b J ; J b ~ Page 1 of 1 3405 N ISE Idaho Falls,lD 83401 (208) 522-2794 (208) 522-2798 ...iotS andrewwelldrill.com www.anclwwelldrll.com ~ WELL DRILLING SERVICES. INC. '7 w., PtlOoi.~ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Schiess & Associates Project: Fals Water Company DATE: Februar 27. 2007 Attention: Paul Scorsby pscoresbytSschiesseng.com We are sending you: COPIES DATE DESCRIPlION . 'l7/07 Revisied Estimate for Test Well #9 ì TliESE ARE TRANSMIITD as checked below:For approval Other as stated below For review and comment As Requested REMARKS Please find attahed the revised bid for test well #9. Note that we are reuiring an additional 2 weeks to complete the work.We may need this at the end of the contract. Also we did not change item #1 1 for the additional development. Electronic data is provided for the benefit of the recipient on this transmittal only an may not be modified or distributed without the express written consent of Schiess & Assoiates. In the even that a conflct arses between drwings or data trsmitted herein and the original stamped drawings or data on fie at the offces of Schiess & Associates. disputes shall be resolved in favor of the stamped originals or data on fie at Schiess & Associates. COpy TO SIGNED 3/1/2007 Dr i l l n g a n d T e s t i n g o f T e s t W e l l # 9 Pr o j e c t N o . 0 4 1 9 2 (A l l i t e m s m u s t h a v e ' U n i t P r i c e " a n d " T o t a l A m o u n t " f i l e d i n ) Co m p l e t e d Or i g i n a l RE V I S E D To To t a l T o D A T E OR I G I N A L RE V I S E D It e m N u m b e r a n d D e s c r i P t i o n Ou a n t i t y Qu a n t i t y Da t e Un i t P r i c e Am o u n t Bid Am o u n t Bi d A m o u n t 1 M o b i l i z a t i o n l e m o b i l i z a t i o n 1 L. S . 1. 6 7 L. S . 1 $1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $2 , 5 0 5 . 0 0 2 8 " C a s i n g 50 L. F . 17 1 L. F . 47 $2 3 . 0 0 $1 , 0 8 1 . 0 0 . $ 1 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $3 , 9 3 3 . 0 0 3 8 " D r i l i n g 10 0 L. F . 37 5 L. F . 11 5 $1 8 . 0 0 $2 , 0 7 0 . 0 0 $1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 46 " C a s i n g 15 0 L. F . 38 4 L. F . 12 4 $1 7 . 0 0 $2 , 1 0 8 . 0 0 $2 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 $6 , 5 2 8 . 0 0 86 " D n l l n i i 20 0 L. F . 29 0 L. F . 13 0 $1 7 . 0 0 . . . $2 , 2 1 0 . 0 0 $3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $4 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 6 5 " C a s i n g ( i f n e c e s s a r ) 30 0 L. F . -3 0 0 L. F . $1 2 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 -$ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 7 5 " D n l l n g 20 L. S . -2 0 L. F . $1 7 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $3 4 0 . 0 0 -$ 3 4 0 . 0 0 8 A b a n d o n T e s t W e l l 1 L. S . 1. 8 3 3 L. S . 0. 8 3 3 4 $1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $1 , 0 0 . 0 8 $1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $2 , 2 0 0 . 0 8 9 1 0 " C a s i n g 47 L. F . $3 0 . 0 0 $1 , 4 1 0 . 0 0 10 10 " D r i l i n g 11 5 L. F . $3 2 . 0 0 $3 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 TO T A L B I D $9 , 9 6 9 . 0 8 $1 5 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 $2 7 , 9 9 6 . 0 8 $1 2 , 4 5 6 . 0 8 I.. Date of Issuance:7"/3-07.Effective Date: Change Order No. :i Í?-i:f-07 Project: New Well NO.9 t Ve'IJiø"fse.F Falls Water CompanyConact" 9. N~i, Weii ~. Contractor: A.Jrew w¿I I b..,"//¡I1&J . Oweii Conct No.: 04192 Dale or Con: Englni Proec No.: 04192 The Contrct Documents are modified .s follows upon execuOon of this Change Order:oeierpllo: ""-,'1'1 .. .JlII ~- -L~~_ 'i J ~ 1_ I 1 Iv'' - ~ ~r ~..r- 6r/1,'i1/i. ""'no /M-t -r ~~~ /,Ader r~s/'Ji1 ,; '" 1'-vt.1 I4YfC ~+ W"X. Z/o kt"tI &i- d,w.4 ~,'.G . bx Ufe Df ~ 'j..m/gJ r-k SC¥~. Attachments: (list docment;'ûPrtlng change): ". I. - ~ ~ ~ C i ~1."'1L t¿tf ..ti-,...y. "#"1L v~ 7 )~ Df f"'lJDSJ. ~ M~.2 j J.,. gfife; -tD- A"d,- tu.L(/ ./"ß'ttJ. A/ø~ i. L/s+ f'1oc'n'; ..t :T.l""r l d. et- tlM ;f..;,,, CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Original Contract Price: $ II'!, Z$S !! CHANGE IN CONTCT TIMES: Original Contract Times: 0 Working days Calendar days Substantial copletion (days or date): æ." 'J & l 2n ø 7, .Ready for final payment (days or date): r:TiuV!.;i~ 2 DO 7 (InCfease) fgeeRlasel from previously ?prOVed ChangeOrders No. I to No. : $ /"$ q l, II (Increase) lL)eere8sel from previously approved Change OrdersNo. I to No. I : Substantial completion (day): I 'i Ready for final payment (days): ~ ., Contract Price prior to this Change Order: $ /30, l¿ I el .. Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial completion (day or date): J;l/¿ (J ß ;2o 7 Ready for final payment (days or date): J"f I II I ì, ')00 7; ) (Increase) -(esfease of this Change Order: $ 'l5, hta9 ~. (Increase) lQeersgeJ of this Change Order: Substantial completion (dayseM): Ready for final payment (days eH): 7~ø Contract Price incorporating this Change Order: $ /7(P, 35"0 ~ Contract Times with all approved Change Orders: Substantial completion ~ date): ~. Æ:11 2"0 7 Ready for final payment (~dale): SeI1T: 22. 2,007r ~ I' I RECOMMENDED: . ACCE~D: By ß..¡, S ~/B' ~ ~~ &tu' l? B,Engineer (Authorzed ~ Ow~hOature) Date: 7,-11-°7 Date: 7- ìg'-¿J7Ap..by,...'_'._l: ~ ACC fii Cont or (Authorzed Slgnalure) Dale: fJ -- (1 - ¡) Î Date:7-23-0C EJCDC No. C.94 I (2002 Editin) Prepared by the Engineers' Joint Contract Doeume~ts Committee and endorsed by thcA...._..:_.._.. 1"____..1 r.............._ Aç.. _..-:.... __d... r......-......._ Q_..I4'......;..... l.....I...... Attachment 34 PageD of2 l Fa l l s W a t e r C o m p a n y We l l N o . 9 Co n t r a c t N o . 0 4 1 9 2 . 1 Ch a n g e O r d e r S u m m a r y Co n t r a c t o r : No t i c e t o P r o c e e d D a t e : An d r e w W e l l D r i l l n g 01 1 2 9 / 0 7 Cu m Cu m Su b s t a n t i a l Fi n a l Ch a n g e O r d e r Co n t r a c t Co n t r a c t Co n t r a C t . C ; o m p l e t i o n Co m p l e t i o n Da t e Am o u n t Am o u n t Ti m e Ti m e Da t e Da t e Or i g i n a l C o n t r a c t 11 2 9 / 2 0 0 7 na $ 11 4 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 12 0 12 0 Ma y 28 , 2 0 0 7 Ju n e 2 7 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n g e O r d e r 1 3/ 2 1 2 0 0 7 $ 16 , 3 9 6 . 0 8 $ 13 0 , 6 8 1 . 0 8 14 13 4 Ju n e 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 Ju l y 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n g e O r d e r 2 6/ 2 1 1 2 0 0 7 * $ 45 , 6 6 9 . 5 5 $ 17 6 , 3 5 0 . 6 3 73 20 7 Au g u s t 2 3 , 2 0 0 7 Se p t e m b e r 2 2 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n g e O r d e r 3 Ch a n g e O r d e r 4 Ch a n g e O r d e r 5 To t a l A p p r o v e d C h a n g e O r d e r s $ 6 2 , 0 6 5 . 6 3 *T h i s i s t h e d a t e o f P r o p o s a l R e q u e s t N o . 2 w h i c h i n i t i a t e d t h i s c h a n g e o r d e r . .i Sc . h i e s s & A s s o c i a t e s EN G I N E E R I N G , P L A N I N G - L A N D S U R V E Y I N G ~ Falls Water Company Well No.9 Contract No. 04192-1 Change Order 2 Contractor: Andrew Well Driling Change Order NO.2 - Additional items for Completion of Production Well ; Schedule of Values ExtendedNo.Item Unit Est. Qty Unit Prie PriceC02. 1 12 inch casing left in place LF 20 $55.00 $1,100.00C02.2 12 inch casing rental LS 1 $19.377.05 $19,377.05C02.3 12 inch drillng LF 50 $9.5.00 $4,750.00C02.4 12 drive shoe LS 1 $640.00 $640.00C02.p SS screen and accessories LS 1 $10,552.50 $10.552.50C02.6 SS screen installation LS 1 $5,50.00 $5.500.00C02.7 Cut off 12 inch casing LS 1 $2,500.00 $2.500.00C02.8 Cement for grouting between 358' & 377'LS 1 $0.00 $0.00C02.9 Sand (if necessary to pack screen)LS 1 $0.00 $0.00C02. 1 0 Additional costs for bonding LS 1 $1,250.00 $1,250.00Total Change Order No.2 $45,669.55 Note: See Andrew Well Drillng Letter and attachments dated July 13. 2007 for details. · Andrew scheule of costs to support letter · Well profile detailng work to date and planned finish · Detailed schedule that justifies the amount of days needed to complete the well .i Schiess & Associates ENGINEERING, PLANING . LAND SURVEING Jo ..Schiess & Associates ENGINEERING, PLANNING. LAND SURVEYING Proposal Request No.2 Date:June 21, 2007 Project:Falls Water Company Well NO.9 Contract/Project No.:04192 To (Contractor):Andrew Well Drillng Attention: Roger Buchanan From (Engineer):Paul Scsb, Sciess & Asiates ~S~ne, ¡;.. tL- S Y Schedule of Values and sheet C-L of the project drawings.Reference: Request: Please submit an itemized proposal for increases to the Contract sum and time for the items listed below: 1. Please provide costs and a timeline whereby the well can be deepened and develope to the bottom of the gravel layer beginning at 370 feet. It is understood that this modification wil necessitate the need for rental of approximately 400 feet of 12 inch casing, a nominal amount of permanent 12 inch casing, approximately 40 feet of 12 dnlling, a 12 inch drive sho, k-packer and approximately 30 feet of 12 inch telescoping stainless steel screen. The screen will be designed based on recommendations made by the screen supplier based on sieve analysis from sand samples. 2. This RFP constiutes a work change diretive to order the 12 inch casing and prepare to continue drillng. We expect timely submission of unit costs for additional items not payable on the existing schedule of values in accordance with the conditions of the contract. Once Andrew submits the additional unit prices, we will prepare a change order for signature. The change order wil reflect the expected cost increase of the additional requested work. cc: Wille Teuscher, DEQ Scott Bruce, Falls Water Company . WELL DRILLING SERVICES1 INC "The Water Professionals" July 13, 2007 Schiess & Associates Attn: Paul Scoresby 7103 S45 W Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Re: Change Order 2 Dear Paul, Here are the requested notes regarding change order 2. C02.1 and COZ.2: The ZO' of 12" casing left in place along with the 386' of 12" casing rental includes the cost of installng and removing the casing along with the cost of the casing. The casing wil retained by us and has ben figured in (reducing) the cost to you. Keep in mind that this isa very timely and labor intensive procedure. Total Cost ($ZO,477.05) COZ.3: Concerning the 50' of 12" driling, the price was figured on per unit cost (slightly) less that the 16" driling. Figuring the added depths, the time required to advance the 12" casing, and extra care and time it took to gather samples. Total Cost ($4,750.00) COZ.4: The LZ" drive shoe wil be left in place. Total Cost ($640.00) COZ.5 and COZ.6: The cost associated with the 40' screen and installation are figured keeping the following in mind. As you can se by the time line (attached) we have a considerable amount of time involved in the installation of the screen and k-packer. The screen must be placed into the well, then we wil need to place driJ stem into the bottom of the screen to help weight the screen down prior to pullng the LZ" casing out. We wil need to move the dril rig off the bore hole and set up jacks to pull backthe LZ" casing. Once the screen is in place and the casing is jacked up we wil be installng a cement annular seal around the left in place 12" casing. Of course this wil have to be done by using a tremmie method. Total Cost ($16,05Z.50) C02.7: Cutting the casing wil require renting equipment (ie; 12" casing cutter coming out of OR), plus a daily rental rate for the equipment, transportation to and from OR, our labor to install and remove the cutter from the well. Total Cost ($2,500.00) COZ.8 and COZ.9: We wil supply the cement and sand for the annuls between the 12" casing left in place wil be supplied byusat no additional charge to you. Total Cost ($0.00) C02. 10: The only other items left to be discussed wil be the monies for the additional bonding cost. This project has gone considerably over the original contract amount and the bond cost wil increase. We have added our cost only and there is no additional amount added to the bond increase. ($1,250.00) COZ.ll: We need additional days to complete. Project time line is attached. Please feel free to contact me regarding any questions or concerns that you or Falls Water may have. Sincerely,~.~ Roger Buchanan, President Andrew Well Drillng Services, Inc. 3405 N 15 E · Idaho Falls · Idaho. 83401 . (208) 522-2794 . Fax (208) 522-2798 Visit our Web site (g www.andrewwelldrill.com .. Dr i l i n g a n d T e s t i n g o f T e s t W e l l # 9 Pr o j e c t N o . 0 4 1 9 2 (A l l i t e m s m u s t h a v e " U n i t P r i c e " a n d " T o t a l A m o u n t " f i l l e d i n ) CH A N G E O R D E R # 2 C0 2 . I i 2 " C a s i n g l e f t i n p l a c e 20 LF 20 $5 5 . 0 0 51 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 C0 2 . 2 38 5 ' C a s i n g R e n t a l 1 2 " J LS i $1 9 , 3 7 7 0 5 $1 9 . 3 7 7 0 5 C0 2 . 3 12 " D r i l l i n 2 50 LF 50 $9 5 . 0 0 $4 . 7 5 0 . 0 0 C0 2 A 12 " D r i v e S h o e I EA i $6 4 0 . 0 0 $6 4 0 . 0 0 C0 2 . 5 40 ' o f S c r e e n t o i n c l u d e 1 0 ' H e a d e r . a n d p a c k e r ( LS I $1 0 . 5 5 2 . 5 0 $1 0 . 5 5 2 . 5 0 C0 2 . 6 In s t a l l S c r e e n I LS 1 $5 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 55 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 C0 2 . 7 Cu t C n s i n g ( P e r C u t ) i EA i $2 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 51 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 C0 2 . 8 Ce m e r 1 t BA G S SO . O O $0 . 0 0 C0 2 . 9 Sa n d BA G S $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 .. . . . C0 2 . 1 0 Ad d í t i o n o f M o b i l i z i i i o n I LS I $1 . 1 5 0 . 0 0 S l . 2 5 0 . 0 0 C0 2 . 1 1 Co n t r a c t D a y s 73 DA Y S .t . . ' Su b s l c l n t i a l C o m p l e t i o n 8 / 2 1 . 0 7 Fi n a l P a y m e n t 9 1 2 2 / 0 7 CH A N G E O R D E R # 2 T O T A L $- l 5 . 6 6 9 . 5 5 O-s -tt'c.d l . 1'8 f rtlv~ ( ~ St",J i i' - If i YI'A v t ( ~ l 0"4 141 .¡/f t'4vt( l si/f iir. 'l'ô i,.J1t II¡ wi fl'fiJel 'ig . £ '\ l'~' I( ~.,,aft' ItlJ...l J' 3. gc¡ bra Iv.. ~ III, /' LtlJ4/¡' ti( . fS A,fotll ¡, /,l Ie ¿tlJtl lI- e ç -f7 ~ltJ, ~q~11; n11-".'r¡l'a"'d f7-fJ't, "",J~/l Y j - '1 S -/.I'l'( '¡ø /f.."- Sit,.,l 'Is -/10 roa,~ .I",~J, 1/"Qv('1 ~r"SU"J 110- 11~ f.,a 1,.l1vt! l st:U\J i l f - Ilò l ;1It. sa..l I; ell"l'u,1 , 1.d..I;L · - '. l t,,,!a If I J. 1- '13 bd.1L I¡. 1.1 i . ¡if 1I't t lo~u.(~ ~s.,d'¡ i ~.. - N r , , l- ¿", k.. 1" l'i~-t4(f 1i.c/t. &1I14./1- ¿'#l!ct'i. , &.'( - llJ .f/ii 'iiid(. 'j/"./r , 'ft' .,/f Ll"..Kt" f((~~/t 'q~4(f J.lt'13i. "" ii \0/~""'",C(c.I'#tJ~I"i 2J;.. Ji.(. ,i I " C'd.V1""., :Ji.(,- :251 .e.,II i,"uif :is'l- LS6 ~(tliI. IiIvJ l,øil¿rl¡' '1çi.291 i' ~'l.c.ll '1k¡Nlfr I,,#k,~ 2 fl"( -.i~~1 t..,.. hfLj, k kLC If- ~ l( - 3t. 'f/~~,.. li'u41 t l'ltJ - jt' tfn,,#' i,""eitt t.".. ~ (. - ~"t) Ål"øk,,. 'Il'Áy bau.tl, .:(c.r l S.~II.1 3(,11. 1l.'l 1tø l.'''~ .sct,.J 3,,'1- 31'( ,s'tèoLJ. t -¡"~""l.l +~ I" 14 'v,j-u/,. S&¡'f V'Cry t""'h' 0"," ( t. If i "'''of , 5o....C "A~ iiue(.i q - l.i:o '1'4. I ~ s.iiJ. 'it' . IL 0(. Stl~, .L,.., ~1"'¡oJc ( i L. ( "'Y "1, . 'leg Iii".l 1M..J, C ~ø"l,ç) 'fDI . If, 3 II~ J.( ranJ l'/J . .. I.L6 t/'Au~( l ~ei 1-- t"r ,",t." - l.M" T ~"'4l 1-/03' -- ~OL - (,)' I . .__ l.Il~.. . , ( Ll J"'"j '"-l""1 t''' I ;, ~, l.;,:¡' c ;.. -¡ ;;i,~ ,-l d' '7 ~ull Cl(~ J "i "1 2:iti -, ¡'"u"f .s..~ I 1~i.S(. 'A(..~f('.. L .1.. h.l. C' i."1' 5C ~ t/t" f:, 'J, ¡. 'ì L-31o Jl~ I) ~(It 0( ",',f "" ~(.1 lJe'l PIiI,tJ¡¡t~A ~t "3?~ ~ of Ii.J..,,"".... 1-" - J:~~ /~~~~tl ',*PAI41...q...1 ~ I it d -./ l- y !' n. ¡. 5.5. _j ~ /, .s C.L (4;', ;1., 1= ¡ii'¿~ '.: :: ' . '"C -- )' 1f'--- d:- - 'tS'1 - iJOc.'..-.)i;/fl ctig 1-/O-t.1 (nt/~ Wtiftf (l). iJ~c. Wt(;"'1 .ASbullfl 7-7- aT rcv¡"/Uh( 7'(O.d) Mo n t h ~. . , Da y M T W TH F SA SU M T W TH F SA SU Da t e 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 Ta s k De s c r i p t i o n Pl a n s c h e d u l e , d e m o b d r i l r i g , o r d e r pi p e , p i p e a r r i v e s , r e - s t r i g , s e t c a s i n g , 1 st r i n g u p c a s i n g h a m m e r , l o a d t o o l s , d r i l & d r i v e 1 2 " t a k e s a m p l e s , f i n i s h d r i l & . . dr i v e , se n d o f f s a m p l e s 2 An a l y z e s a m p l e s 3 En g i n e e r r e v i e w s a m p l e , a p p r o v e w e l l de s i g n , o r d e r s c r e e n 4 Re c e i v e s c r e e n 5 Se t , s c r e e n , r e m o v e d r i l , s e t u p j a c k s 6 Pu l l c a s i n g e x p o s i n g s c r e e n 7 Pu l l c a s i n g e x p o s i n g s c r e e n , r e m o v e 'a c k s , r e - s e t r i o 8 Be o i n d e v e l o p m e n t , d e v e l o p 9 De v e l o p w e l l - r e m o v e d r i l r i Q . . 10 Se t u p t e s t p u m p 11 Fi n i s h s e t t i n g u p t e s t p u m p & t r a i l r u n , re c o v e r y 12 Te s t p u m p 13 Pu l l t e s t p u m p , c a p w e l l 14 Pu l l & a b a n d o n t e s t w e l l 15 Pu l l & a b a n d o n t e s t w e l l SU B S T A N T I A L C O M P L E T I O N .. LL C' :r C\l- S ro I-ro ..C' ~0C' ::mC/C\ 0:CXC/C\. LL ,.C\ :r (DI-C\ S I/C\ I-""C\ LL C'.- :r C\I-.- :;..S .-::.-.. I-0.- ~m ::CXC/ 0:,.C/ LL (D :r I/l- S "" I-C' ~C\ SA T 4 1 4 T 21 l w S U 22 2 6 ~I Date of Issuance:~-b-OB Effective Date: \,nange Order No. 3 8 -&-1~ 07, Project: New Wen NO.9 a VIiAI J.i.çe.joir: Falls Water Company Conact: A / '''-.e'' vl/e.l! No, 1 Contrictor:A-Vl4r(. Well D,./I/'Í1í1. ~¿. , \/ Owlli Contrct No.: 04192 Dili of Con: I - i:1 - Q 7 Englnefi Projec No.: 04192 The Contrct Documents are modified ai follows upon execution of this Change Order: De8çtpllo: -l ~ 1 .. I' I'TIiÙ CM~k ,,rrec .s~ P""ft i& ~~/ t-"tl?kl.,.. ,,1- & weil ,:114 4SSf!U;"b/ ~sfr. 77~ Cø..~ if~ -/r- c/e",ellle~ffi ¿J-f #i well iv"\J .4 fro ~t,l,.s-k.,fiÍllý ÍId'eJser d"C.e -# cC.,¡')1"C~ .514' t;,o.!occf,¡,1"_ Attachments: (List documents supprting change): !' I .: J,. ~~ l ~ .I!"0h4~t vrol;r-.J "'''-7' l!4.~kJ I¿tf dìl~ P'?~),. I Rrues f A/-. 3 ../ .r-,I:"....i4:, dQlw,'j.. 110, i. ..,'h:-h..., df /A~",-: T;M. L $cli, 11, Lk-J ;be L" ;! ø l ~o B . ) Wo". k- CI"' L.. Dly",.."v ~ 1tJ2, aM ~!~6'()", So1..,.,.//¡ ; CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: $¡/'if zøs ~ ¡ CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original Contract Tims: 0 Working days ciaiendar days Substantial completion (days or date): I) 0 ci Mø v é:ß. 2 OD 7 Ready for final payment (days or date): /5 l) d ::;~ ;i"4 ZO 07 Original Contract Price: ancreasè)(DecreaseJ from previously approved Change ~ (Decrease) from previously approved Change Orders. Orders No. i to No.,; : No. I . to No. .; : cl b:3 Substantial copletion (da): 87$ c,;i,OfpS ;: Ready for final paymnt (days): ø Contract Price prir to this Change Order: $ /7??13S0 ~ Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial copletion (day or date): ;)07 d Ready for final payment (days or date): ¿) 3 7 cI &J,~20i17SetJ't. 2. 2-07a- J (icre~DecreaSe) of this Chànge Order: 71 .$ LOr¿ Mí? ~ ((cre~ (Decrease) of this Change Order: Substantial copletion (days or dale): Ready for final payment (days or date): ;)7 d r¿ Contract Price Incorporating this' Change Order: ?Ll .$ ;)71æ,btf3~ Contract Times with all approved Change Orders: Substantial completion (days or date): ~ i. d Ready for final. payment (days or date): 'I.t'i d 1Vir IZ200 8 A-r. Itq 2-oog Dale:3-&-0& :~CET(D~n~ OWer (Aulhorlzed Signalure) Dale: 3 -t, - Ol DE? M4/£~ Cona (Authored Signature) 3- tl '-1/ q t/'=8 RECOMMENDED:By:l?dU:~S~ Engineer (AUlhOrlZ~By: l Dale: Approve by Funding Agency (if applicable):Dale: EJCDC No. C.941 (2002 Edition) Prepared by the Engineers' Joint Contract Documen.ts Committee and endorsed by the AcclUi.lPd l:..n..rol rnnlrA,rlnrc nf A mpri,.. anll th.. ("nn.l......linn Siw,.ifi...tinnc In.titii'". Attachment 35 Page 0 of2 -J Fa l l s W a t e r C o m p a n y We l l N o . 9 Co n t r a c t N o . 0 4 1 9 2 - 1 Ch a n g e O r d e r S u m m a r y Co n t r a c t o r : No t i c e t o P r o c e e d D a t e : An d r e w W e l l D r i l i n g 01 / 2 9 / 0 7 Cu m Cu m Su b s t a n t i a l Fi n a l Ch a n g e O r d e r Co n t r a c t Co n t r a c t Co n t r a c t Co m p l e t i o n Co m p l e t i o n Da t e Am o u n t Am o u n t Ti m e Ti m e Da t e Da t e Or i g i n a l C o n t r a c t l/ 2 9 / 2 0 0 7 na $1 1 4 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 12 0 12 0 Ma y 2 8 , 2 0 0 7 Ju n e 2 7 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n g e O r d e r 1 3/ 2 / 2 0 0 7 $1 6 , 3 9 6 . 0 8 $1 3 0 , 6 8 1 . 0 8 14 13 4 Ju n e 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 Ju l y 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n l t e O r d e r 2 6/ 2 1 / 2 0 0 7 * $4 5 , 6 6 9 . 5 5 $1 7 6 , 3 5 0 . 6 3 73 20 7 Au g u s t 2 3 , 2 0 0 7 Se p t e m b e r 2 ; 2 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n l t e O r d e r 3 3/ 6 / 2 0 0 8 $1 0 0 , 2 9 2 . 7 1 $2 7 6 , 6 4 3 . 3 4 20 7 41 4 Ma r c h 1 7 , 2 0 0 8 Ap r i l 1 6 , 2 0 0 8 Ch a n l t e O r d e r 4 Ch a n l t e O r d e r 5 ~ To t a l A p p r o v e d C h a n g e O r d e r s $ 16 2 , 3 5 8 . 3 4 *T h i s i s t h e d a t e o f Pr o p o s a l R e q u e s t N O . 2 w h i c h i n i t i a t e d t h i s c h a n g e o r d e r . .i EN G I N E E R I N G . P L A N I ' J l N G . LA N D S U R V E Y I N G Sc h i e s s & A s s o c i a t e s Fails Water Company Well NO.9 Contract No. 04192-1 Cost Projection Co nt.actor: Notice to Proceed Date; -i Sdiies~ & Associates ....i:., :.~,.._, 4ndrew Wei! Drillng 1.'9i2007 Qwar:!i!y Adj:.st;-eni5 Tnrougn Change Order r.~::. 2 i Oiflerence of O¡;a:"tity Adjuslmer:ts :=0:" Change G::anae ::-r::er 3 Order's 2 & 3 Total Change Order NO.1 New Unit Price Items $4,926.00 -$164.00 $45,669.55 $46,399.55 $730.00 Total Contract Through Change Order 2 5176,350.63 letion of Production Wet! S29.945.74 T etal Contract Price S276.643.34 $100.292.71 Qliantily Adjustments and Additons tv Change Order 3 Contract Amount Tnrough Change Order No.2 Total Contract Price Including Change Order 3 5100,292.71 S176.350.63 5276.643.341 Schiess and Associates Page 1 31612008 WELL DRILLING SERVICES, INC "The Water Professionals" February 28,2008 Schiess & Associates Attn: Paul Scoresby 7103 S45 W Idaho Falls, ID 83402 Re: Change Order 3 Dear Paul, Here are the notes regarding change order 3. Request For Change Order #3 C03.1 12" Pipe and coupling preparation HR 10.5 $55.00 $577.50C03.2 Provide K-packer EA 1 $614.85 $614.85C03.3 Fabricate rock removal tool HR 8 $55.00 $40.00C03.4 Rock removal HR 8 $105.00 $840.00C03.5 Installation of 12" casing, coupling, K-packer HR 19 $105.00 $1,995.00C03.6 Removal of 12" casing, coupling, K-packer HR 18 $105.00 $1,890.00C03.7 Perform inflatable isolation packer testing HR 12 $105.00 $1,260.00C03.8 Fabricate 10" bayonette fitting LS 1 $385.00 $385.00C03.9 10" Casing LF 119 $39.11 $4,654.09C03.1O Installation of 10" casing and bayonette fitting HR 12 $105.00 $1,260.00C03.11 Sand, bentonite, gravel, cement LS 1 $1,176.80 $1,176.80C03.12 Installation of formation seal HR 38 $105.00 $3,990.00C03.13 Prepare tools for zone development HR 28 $55.00 $1,540.00C03.14 Setup & install zone development tooling HR 38.5 $105.00 $4,042.50C03.15 Remove and transport zone development equipment HR 16 $105.00 $1,680.00C03.16 Additional test pump mobilization LS 1 $3,60.00 $3,600.00 CHANGE ORDER #3 TOTAL $29,945.74 C03.1: Fabrication of slip over sleeve and beveling in preparation for installation in welL. This was an attempt to case out the rock portion of the well. C03.2: This packer is the sealing device between the 12" casing and the 16" casing. This was a store bought fitting not manufactured at A WDS. Please notice the price did not include mark up for profit. C03.3: This tool was made in house (at A WDS) specifically to remove accumulated small rocks from the top of the 12" casing that was left in place. You were only charged for the actual hours it took to build the tool. This is a specialty tool not commercially available. 3405 N 15 E. Idaho Falls. Idaho. 83401 . (208) 522-2794 . Fax (208) 522-2798 Visit our Web site (ß www.andrewwelldril.com C03.4: Actual time spent installng tooling, removing rocks, and removing tools. Also included at no additional charge was a video inspection to insure the rocks had been removed. C03.5: Our normal charge for our Rig Directed Rate (RDR) is $275.00 per hour. Please note that we charged only for man hours and not for using the dril rig (RDR). C03.6 After additional development it was decided by engineer and contractor the attempt to seal the rock portion failed. We then removed the 12" casing. Please notice that you were not charged (RDR) for this removaL. C03.7: Upon discovery of multiple aquifers A WDS purchased at our expense an inflatable flow thru isolation packer. The packer was installed to verify the existence of the aquifers. This information was used to determine the final design of the well. C03.8: This is the charge for time and materials used in the piece that entered the telescoping screen. C03.9: This is the cost of 10" casing used to isolate the rock portion of the well. This price per foot is different from the 10" casing used in the test well beause it is a different thickness. C03.1O: Please notice that you were not charged (RDR) for the 10" casing installation. C03.11: This is the backfill materials surrounding the 10" casing providing stabilty and sealant for the separation ofthe multiple aquifer condition. C03.12: You were charged normal charge out rates for the installation of the formation seaL. C03.13: This charge is the shop rate for preparation of zone development tools. C03.14: This cost includes installation of zone development tools and resetting the dril rig. Please notice that you were not charged (RDR) for this work. C03.15: Please notice that you were not charged (RDR) for this work. C03.16: This reflects a discounted price from the original test pump mobilzation. Please feel free to contact me regarding any questions or concerns that you or Falls Water may have. Sincerely,~-~ Roger Buchanan, President Andrew Well Drillng Services, Inc. 3405 N 15 E. Idaho Falls. Idaho. 83401 . (208) 522-2794. Fax (208) 522-2798 Visit our Web site (B www.andrewwelldril.com ..Schiess & Associates ENGINEERING - PLANNING -LAND SURVYING Proposal Request No.3 Date:December 10, 2007 Project:Falls Water Company Well NO.9 ContractlroJect No.:04192/7.0 To (Contractor):Andrew Well Drillng Attention: Roger Buchanan From (Engineer):Pauf ~Sc & As""esSigned: 1- H ., S~ C-2 of the project drawings and attached well detailReference: Request: Please submit an itemized proposal for increases to the Contract sum and time for the items listed below: 1. After further review of the well dynamics and finding out that the middle aquifer and the gravel aquifer below are tw separate and distict aquifers with a difference in static water level elevation of 24 feet, it was determined, per our meeting with IDWR, that only one aquifer could be developed for the well, and the other aquifer must be sealed off. You are directed to seal off the upper aquifer and finish the well utilzing the lower aquifer in conformnc with the attched well completion detaiL. 2. Please deliver an accounting of your effort regarding this well since 10-1-07. CC: Wille Teuscher, DEQ Scott Bruce, Falls Water Company Wi.1, 1:1 I 1'1.11 i H~11 'I s i. ~ l!i ~ f ~ S. l If co h ~oj ! l. " I~.~ i q~~:o.:o. it iii :0 . ~ ~ ". ~ ~ ~ ~ l §~ ~ f~ ent"U ="2~ ...!~ ~t ~ i; ~ ~~ ~ç i;z i; B ~.a:: ... ¥~ ~ l ô ~ .":: ", ~;;-;:';:n0 3: ~z-. ~~1"..r-r-¡; Z ~9 .. to !: n ~0 ~i:"0 '"r-.. 1"::0Z "0 r;Z (" ~I , q ~~_co'"''ClZCl~~ CÐzin'" 0 ~I~ v,rr~ g"'0z i I;:j-i I:!¡r- 10' Ti;~""'vi~-CO"I \:oz~~~jI ~co i em ~~.~~":0 2~t ~:g6 "",m~~~~,"0'";"",~~~I z_'""';00 ,."",~~~zo'":~~~°l1aS ~;i~"°0'"~ö~~zo Çl:xG;~Ž ...."~'"ö ~El"~:IQ '"". "Z ~~~~~!iz-2~~coO g~~~z il_õ --:¡c ..,-x-----.õ'zo~~O'"r'~~~"0s=~!i'"z ooil 356'ci '..367' 375' . " NOTE: USE RECENTLY PURCHASED PLUG TO NEUTRALIZE STATIC HEAD IN 10. CASING WHILE PLACING SILICA SAND. BENTONITE, PEA GRVEL AND GROUT AND PREVENT THESE MATERIALS FROM ENTERING THE to. CASING. 16fl CASiNG S£ALfr N PLAC::TO GROUND SuRf ':.:T "07' 248' 250' TOP Oi: to" CA$¡IK. TOP OF' G-ROUT 5r,~,. 256' 261' . 6" NCMI!\'Ài. D~tU.r:iHOLE:O 8C:"10M Or: wEu. 299' 335' ~. ..~--_._.~'-~::.:i£ -=3===~::z. -...."'~..,._.. ~~ =!:.::-_~.~~ : =-=:TOP'Ot.10/2C Sk.CA $A.ND ---i::.zr=_ .340'12" CASINt-"~":Z:' to/20 Sil'CA ~";MlC SEE DETAIL ::. r":HlS SHEr:ì ,OR CONNECiio'" !3£rwEP.. ~a~ CASiNG12- C.\ING, ,,"'D L2~ SCfEN TOP OF LOV.::';; AQi.lln:R AND BonOM Of HARD GR£~N BAS;',: r, STATIC WATEE i:l::v. l ::3' l,¿M CAS\~iC.: WELL COMPLETION PL';': NÇf TO SCALE --. --. ..uu, all: J 3 iaS5224Ø9 FALLS WQTE CO I~ Dee 04 07 08.5'. SCHlEIS' ASSOC. I~U~'~~~.8Z3Z ----, -.... ..&;.,.. WORK CHNGE DIRCTIVE DATe OF isfd _10llO ~'._1 _ EfCl1VDATE_lÐI_.: OWNB ft1F WsçciCOACM ~ W.it Drli_,. Jil. CoUICC ti W"i Prt: Nø Wel", 2 l Wei HmieOWNP's Con No,..RNGlNa'l Ptect No. ~ You ire dl 10 pnlf JIy witb lf followåi thallCs):lletcripl Case - di ~.., wit i 2 heh cHÎ. l'.c i J-Ili at 'll lop or di 12 ii c'ii. .... -.. l-pclCl .m die ta otlh 12 Å\ cedAr to b:.'üp se ~ ib 16 il1C.."" dlCl li eæ 12 ÌI' cØÍII. Do no ~ Ik 12 iKcDn inilt 16 ui.~.. ." Il ... "111l~ On el Opeon 15 eon11l ûu. .. pu ea of ,.m,q3.00 øm ll J 20Qf clWlown. lt ¡ st dr_wa an sa ,rouc .. at lo ran,. fl'$O PlIO ',00 ptwitl Mn IISIIIl .. IS mi1l .'n c: *! Ì1ic .. tl... If iab Ir rii¥a.lh (N -id die (CiC '''. . Pu ofWUI au DiCiw: nc ÎI is to maii~ iI aIlt pall rll of lb weM foethe - COl. ne dete.. ra l'ns 3.0 ua ACI f' Jf OWNE orO)cr bclic ch The Ib c"'cc hu ii Co PliQ; MY Cli.i fon 0i Orr btle ll wi iovdvc on oi in oftl foO. IllidlOs as dcrme.i me Coh".DtsMc 01.__,.. ÍI C.'bCl Prce: o 'Onlr l'cu flYiUOp Siim er Co oftl "oa = I!Ït ~ (dt) iD CClPrict:i_a._· tl c.. if~i~.. in-. the acd ~ini is 110110 be CJl,,-e "ji_i fi1hc:IIj'...ior. EsmaUl iiasc (dD, II Cnnet Tam5: S_illial ~ri: _14_ dA)'; Re fo ft_. l'a,..nt __U_ diyi. kECMM6HÐSD:AUtHORIZ; -. ap Macùl$ aiIlEGIBY:£~#~S~rø1ll Cn-x 0WD.By:K~~ ....._..._ A".."" Hy._ ¿1Jk-Appriiicd 8)';N/À__._ ElCDC No. l9iv.S-F U"6 filÌ Moifiel t~." li il. J.. ("_OCl ~_ri""l\.1c lf tnancil tor TI "'oe ciaJ Cllltac"" of "'''-'.'' it (;-11.."' ~pefìUIIQI. ....'_.. PA "87 ..~ e ~:. - r.c Development Time For Falls Water Date Hours 1/12/2007 6 1/13/2007 4 1/14/2007 1 2/8/2007 0.5 2/12/2007 0.5 12 Pay Request 3 6/15/2007 3.5 15.5 Pay Request 4 8/7/2007 7.5 8/8/2007 8 8/9/2007 8 8/11/2007 5.25 8/13/2007 9 8/14/2007 6.5 8/15/2007 8 8/16/2007 10 8/17/2007 8 8/20/2007 7 8/21/2007 8 8/23/2007 10 8/24/2007 10 8/27/2007 1.5 8/30/2007 9.5 8/31/2007 6.5 9/4/2007 4 9/13/2007 7 149.25 Pay Request 5 2/5/2008 4 2/6/2008 3 2/7/2008 4.5 2/8/2008 7 2/11/2008 6.5 2/12/2008 1.5 2/21/2008 7 2/22/2008 8.5 2/23/2008 3 2/25/2008 8 2/26/2008 8 2/27/2008 9 2/28/2008 9 2/29/2008 2 230.25 Pay Request 6 ~ Date of Issuance:i-1I-08 Effective Date: Change Order No. 't (6'., I) '1-11..0 s Project: New Well No. 9 er: Falls Water Company Ow. Conct No.: 04192 Contct:N~ (,.ell ~. r- WM!nglnee"', Projec No.: 04192 conor J""c, . The Contrct Documents are modified as follows upon execution of this Change Order: Descrption: E/l'N I ~"i~'-7 ¿& rl(~ft""..,.dHRg. Attachments: (List documents supporting change): r:1~~r .fl"û'/'h-lr t:/t(,.l7 /'11,. /M,...JtNJ l.ff N/¡",i+""..+c SI¡U ~L D.r." 3., ",,4 ttuö1& e".rL S f1 "' rr SfV'" d.r ii ~e. CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original Contract Price: Original Contract Times: 0 Working days 0 Calendar days Substantial completion (days or dale): $ /I't;i B5 ~ Ready for final payment (days or dale): e(DeCreaSe) from previously ,proved ChangeOf ers No. I to No. : $ Ib2- 3 S 8 7; (Increase) (Decrease) from previously approved ChangNo. to No. Substantial completion (da):_bfial....!.." . ï¥1l Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial completion (days or dae): Ready for final payment (days or date): Contract Price prior to this Change Order: ?:S ,)11 t, 13 . Contract Price incorporating this Change Order: (Increase) (Decrease) of this Change Order: Substantial completion (days or date): Ready for final payment (days or dale): ~ (Decrease) of this Change Order: (: Â'S¡ZOQ -- $ d.ci, ''13 ~, Contract Times with all approved Change Substantial completion (days or date): Ready for final. payment (days or date): RECOMMENDED: By: Engineer (Authorized Signature) Date:1-1/-08 Dale:i, i I Approved by Funding Agency (If applicable):,hd~Dale: EJCDC No. C-941 (2002 Edition) Prepared by the Engineers' Joint Contrået Doeumen.lB Committee and endorsed by the "'lllli.lH £...n.....1 rnntr...tn.. nf A m..ri... .n" fl rn...irii..tinn ~n....i,....tinnc 1..ú1tiltp. Attachment 36 Pap 0 On Fa l l s W a t e r C o m p a n y We l l N o . 9 Co n t r a c t N o . 0 4 1 9 2 - 1 Ch a n g e O r d e r S u m m a r y Co n t r a c t o r : No t i c e t o P r o c e e d D a t e : An d r e w W e l l D r i l i n g 01 / 2 9 / 0 7 Cu m Cu m Su b s t a n t i a l Fi n a l Ch a n g e O r d e r Co n t r a c t Co n t r a c t Co n t r a c t Co m p l e t i o n Co m p l e t i o n Da t e Am o u n t Am o u n t Ti m e Ti m e Da t e Da t e Or i g i n a l C o n t r a c t 11 2 9 / 2 0 0 7 na $1 l 4 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 12 0 12 0 Ma y 2 8 , 2 0 0 7 Ju n e 2 7 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n g e O r d e r 1 3/ 2 / 2 0 0 7 $1 6 , 3 9 6 . 0 8 $1 3 0 , 6 8 1 . 0 8 14 13 4 Ju n e 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 Ju l y 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n g e O r d e r 2 6/ 2 1 1 2 0 0 7 * $4 5 , 6 6 9 . 5 5 $1 7 6 , 3 5 0 . 6 3 73 20 7 Au g u s t 2 3 , 2 0 0 7 Se p t e m b e r 2 2 , 2 0 0 7 Ch a n g e O r d e r 3 3/ 6 / 2 0 0 8 $1 0 0 , 2 9 2 . 7 1 $2 7 6 , 6 4 3 . 3 4 20 7 41 4 Ma r c h 1 7 , 2 0 0 8 Ap r i l 1 6 , 2 0 0 8 Ch a n g e O r d e r 4 4/ 1 1 1 2 0 0 8 $6 , 2 0 0 . 2 8 $2 8 2 , 8 4 3 . 6 2 0 41 4 Ma r c h 1 7 , 2 0 0 8 Ap r i l 1 6 , 2 0 0 8 . To t a l A p p r o v e d C h a n g e O r d e r s $ 16 8 , 5 5 8 . 6 2 *T h i s i s t h e d a t e o f P r o p o s a l R e q u e s t N O . 2 w h i c h i n i t i a t e d t h i s c h a n g e o r d e r . s EN G I N E E R I N G . P L A N N I N G . L . \ N D S U R V E , ( I ~ J G Sc h i e s s & A s s o c i a t e s .. I 8 1_lestWeilT ala 01 Bid Schle I t"~i,¡.uu 1."" I Schdule H Prclon Wel ~.;l.ug 1.tIU! ~~.tsl$2,84.o $19,81.80 1.""1 :¡,¡."'1 $19,8.08 -$.72 . II9Wel OrHno MoiZli 0210 LS 53"".00 1 53,ow.1.00 $3.90.00 1.001024 in drive sho LS $1.00.00 1 $1.00.1.00 $1.00.00 1.001124 in ca -Inslal an ree LF $7.00 50 $3.5W.49.00 $3.43.00 49.001224 in drlli LF $190.00 100 $19.0.93.00 $17,670.00 93.001320 Inc ca LF 591.00 150 $13.65.122.00 $11.102.00 122001420 in drive sho LS $1.50.00 1 $1.50.1.00 $1,50.00 1.00 $1,50.001520indrlHngLF$150.00 20 "",00.162.00 $24.30.00 16200 $24,3.001616 in cang (il near)LF $6.00 40 $2.68.256.00 $17.152.OC 25.00 $17.35001716 inc driv sh IK neaM LS $1 $1.2.1.00 $l.2.OC 1.00 I1816 in drno (if neSar)LF 20 :i,OO.114.00 $l1.40.OC 114.00 .0019DeelmeHR1253.Jl.23.25 23.25 .7520Tesi pu mobilizali LS $5.50.00 1 $550.1.00 1.0021Test puping HR $160.00 40 $6.40 40.00 .00 7750 .0022Surac se CY $2.00 7.5 $1.8.17.75 '.50 17.75 .5023TV inpe LS $1,00.00 1 $1.00.1.00 00 1.00 . .0024WatertetiLS$2,240.00 1 $240.1.00 1.00 $2,240.00Total 01 Bid Schdule H $9,745.00 $,550.25 $181,751.2 Chan Ord No.1. AddUoIt lor Tei DrlHln COl. 10 in cain C012 10 inh drill Tolel Chang Or NO.1 New UnlI Prce lIem. LF LF $3.00 $3.00 Cha Ord No 2. Addilloni_ for Com "lion 01 Proct Well $6.21.00 47 115 $1.410. 49.00 $3,68. 108.00 $5,09.00 $0.00 $1,470.00 53.45. $4.92.00 49.00 108.00 $1.470.00 53.456.00 $4,92.00 01 $0.00 Exte ElCNo.Ite Uni Ur Pr Est Ot Pr"Est QI PricCOO.1 12 inc pi an copling preparli HR $5.00 10.5 $577 10.5 Sf.00.2 Provid K.peker EA $614.R5 1 $614.1 $614.C03.3 Fablcle rock reoval to HR 15.00 8 14.8 $4.00.4 IHO remal HR ~105.oo 8 $8.8 $8.COO.5 Instali 0112 inc~ an K.ii HR $10500 19 $1.95.19 $1,9.00.6 Real of 12 in co. an K.paer HR $10500 18 $1.89.18 $1,89.COO.7 Perlorm Inllta Isat teti HR $105.00 12 $1.2.12 $1.2.00.8 Fable 10 inc bayO filtng LS 53.00 1 53.1 53.COO.9 10 in ca LF $3.11 119 $4.65.119 $4.65.COO. 10 Instali 0110 in ca an bayl filtng HR $10500 12 $1.2.12 $1.2.COO.11 Sa. beile. aravel. ce LS $1.176.80 1 $1.176.1 ilCOO. 12 intali of formali sea HR $105.00 38 53,99.38C03.13 Prepare to for zon deel HR $5.00 28 $1.54.28COO. 14 Se an in zon dell toin HR $105.00 38.5 $4,04.38.5COO. 15 Remove an trans zon deelme eauipm HR $105.00 16 $1.68.1600.16 Adti tet Dum mobat HR 53.6.00 1 53.60.1 .60. No. CO. 1C0.2C0.3 02.4 Unit Uni Pr EstLF $5.00 20LS 19,377.05 1LF $900 50LS $8. 1LS $10.55.50 1 LS $5.5.00 1LS $2,500 1LS $0.00 1LS $0.00 1LS $1,250.00 1 Total Conlract Through Change Ord 2 Chage Ordr No 3 Completion 01 Prouctio Well Total Cha Order No. 3 Totl Conlr Prlce Throgh Chenge Ordr 3 Outy Adtments 10 Chan Orde 4 Cotract Amoun Throuh Chang Orr NO.3 Totl Conlr Price Including Change Ordr 4 Schiess and Asaies Page 1 $176,3.63 $2,9.74 $276,64.3 $2,9.74 EJ $6,200.28 56.2.28 $276,64.34$2,8.621 41110'2