Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061120_1738.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER CO MMISSI 0 NER SMITH COMMISSIONER HANSEN COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL FROM:CECELIA A. GASSNER DATE:NOVEMBER 15, 2006 SUBJECT:CACTUS INTERNATIONAL, INc.'APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY; CASE NO. CZ8- T -06- On November 7, 2006, Cactus International, Inc. ("Cactus ) filed an Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) to provide telephone service to customers who collocate equipment in its facility, such as Direct Inward Dialed telephone lines to Internet Service Providers. The Application states that it will provide these services through interconnection agreements with Verizon Northwest Inc. and intends to be able to start providing such services beginning January 1 , 2007. Its Application states that it intends to provide Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services at some point in the future. Cactus has a Certificate of Incorporation showing it has been an Idaho corporation since March 12 1990. Its principal place of business is in Moscow, Idaho. The Company has provided financial information and the appropriate contact information for its registered agent for service of process within Idaho.The Company also filed a revised illustrative tariff on November 15 2006. Its proposed service territory will coincide with Verizon s Moscow, Idaho market area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Company s Application be processed by Modified Procedure with a twenty-one (21) day comment period. This should allow sufficient time for interested parties to review the Company s Application and file their comments with the Commission. Reference Commission Rules of Procedure, IDAP A 31.01.01.201-.204. DECISION MEMORANDUM COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission preliminarily find that the public interest may not require a hearing to consider the issues presented in this case, and that this case is appropriate for Modified Procedure pursuant to Commission Rules of Procedure 201 through 204? Does the Commission approve ofthe recommended comment period? cece M:CZ8-O6- DECISION MEMORANDUM