Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050912_1319.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSIONER HANSEN COMMISSION SECRETARY LEGAL WORKING FILE FROM:BEVERL Y BARKER DATE:SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 RE:IDAHO POWER TARIFF ADVICE NO. 05-08 - PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO DEPOSIT POLICY FOR IRRIGATION CUSTOMERS (SCHEDULES 24 & 25). BACKGROUND Idaho Power is currently authorized to collect deposits from irrigation customers under certain circumstances. A customer who owes $1 000 or less on December 31 but who has received two or more reminder notices of more than $100 during a 12-month period will be required to pay a Tier 1 deposit. A customer whose service is disconnected during the out-of- season period due to non-payment or who was required to pay a Tier 2 deposit during the previous year is also required to pay a Tier 1 deposit. A Tier 1 deposit amount is 1.5 times the customer s estimated monthly in-season bill, and is applied to the account at the end of the irrigation season. A customer who owes more than $1000 on December 31 is required to pay a Tier 2 deposit for the following irrigation season. A customer who has been discharged from bankruptcy or who has had receivership proceedings terminated will also be required to pay a Tier 2 deposit. A Tier 2 deposit amount is 4 times the customer s estimated monthly in-season bill. The deposit is applied to each monthly bill as it becomes due throughout the season. COMPANY PROPOSAL Idaho Power is seeking to close a loophole that allows a customer who has a large outstanding balance owing but chooses not to farm for one or more seasons to avoid paying a Tier 2 deposit. For example, an irrigation customer with an accumulated unpaid balance of DECISION MEMORANDUM - 1 -SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 $50 000 on December 31 2003, does not farm in 2004 or 2005. On December 15 2005 , the customer pays in full the balance still owing from 2003. The following spring, the customer requests service for the 2006 irrigation season. Since the bill was paid prior to December 31 , the customer is required to pay a Tier 1 deposit, even though a Tier 2 deposit would more closely match the degree of credit risk to which Idaho Power is exposed given the customer s payment history. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The revisions to Schedules 24 and 25 proposed by Idaho Power will close a loophole in the existing tariff and are consistent with the original intent of the Company s deposit policy as previously approved by the Commission. Staff recommends approval. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to approve Idaho Power s proposed revisions to Schedules 24 & 25? Beverly Barke i:udmemos/ipc irrigation DECISION MEMORANDUM - 2 -SEPTEMBER 8, 2005