HomeMy WebLinkAbout200411221st Request for Admissions of ATT to Qwest.pdfMary York, Esq. (ISB No. 5020)
HOLLAND & HART, LLP
Suite 1400, U.S. Bank Plaza
101 South Capitol Boulevard
Post Office Box 2527
Boise, Idaho 83701
Telephone: (208) 342-5000
Facsimile: (208) 343-8869
T. Scott Thompson, Esq.
Brian M. Josef, Esq.
Rita Tewari, Esq.
Cole, Raywid & Braverman, LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.
Second Floor
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: (202) 659-9750
Meredith R. Harris, Esq.
AT&T Corp.
One AT&T Way
Bedminster, New Jersey 07921
(908) 532-1850
Robert M. Pomeroy, Esq. (CSB No. 7640)
HOLLAND & HART, LLP
8390 E. Crescent Parkway
Suite 400
Greenwood Village, CO 80111-2800
Telephone: (303) 290-1600
Facsimile: (303) 290-1606
C,," r'"
' ", """ "...--"
i~~~J '
, ", ,,~";.;;
:: Ci"li -'.
,,-,~:;~!~~ ~~~~~~
(./J 1"7\
)""
i"V
C::)
c ' :1::
r ,,
cn
':-:~ .::
c.~J E:J
Attorneys for AT&T Corp. and AT&T
Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.
BEFO RE THE ID AH 0 PUBLIC UTILITIES CO MMISSI 0 N
AT&T CORP., a New York Corporation;
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE
MOUNTAIN STATES, INC., a Colorado
Corporation
Complainants
vs.
QWEST CORPORATION, a Colorado
Corporation
Respondent.
Case No. ATT-O4-
CLAIMANTS' FIRST SET OF
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO
RESPONDENT
AT&T Corp. and AT&T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc., by and
through their attorneys, hereby submit this First Set of Requests for Admissions (the "Requests
in the above-captioned matter to Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), as follows:
DEFINITIONS
The terms used herein shall have the meanings indicated in Claimants' First Set of Requests
For Data and Production of Documents, which is being served concurrently herewith.
II.INSTRUCTIONS
Pursuant to the Scheduling Order issued in this Action by the Idaho Public
Utilities Commission on November 9, 2004, each request enumerated below shall be deemed
admitted unless Qwest responds to such request within 14 days.
If any request cannot be answered fully, the same shall be admitted or denied to
the extent possible, and, the reasons for not answering more fully shall be stated. If any request
contains any matter whatsoever that Qwest can admit, that portion of the request should be
admitted, and Qwest shall specify so much of it as is deemed true.
Those portions of each request that cannot be admitted, if any, shall be specified
and the factual reason for denial set forth with particularity.
Qwest shall not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to
admit or deny any request unless Qwest states that it has made a reasonable inquiry and the
information known to or readily obtainable by Qwest is insufficient to enable Qwest to admit or
deny the matter.
CLAIMANTS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO RESPONDENT Page 2
III.REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
Admit that the per foot, per year conduit occupancy rates charged to AT&T by
Qwest under the conduit occupancy licenses attached to the Complaint as Exhibit 3 , and as
expressed in Qwest's invoices attached to the Complaint at Exhibit 6 have not been calculated
pursuant to or in conformance with the Federal Communications Commission s ("FCC") conduit
rental rate formula, as expressed below and defined in 47 C.F .R. 9 1.1409( e )(3).
1 Duct NO. of Net Conduit Investment Ca Maximum Rate rry gNo. of Ducts No. of Inner Ducts Ducts System Duct Length (ft./m.Charge
RateLmear ft./m. ercentag e 0 on Ult apaclty et mear ost 0 a on Ult
Admit that the per foot, per year conduit occupancy rates charged to AT&T by
Qwest under the conduit occupancy licenses attached to the Complaint as Exhibit 3, and as
expressed in Qwest's invoices attached to the Complaint at Exhibit 6 do not comply with the
FCC's conduit rental rate formula, as expressed in Request No.1 above, and defined in 47
91.1409(e)(3).
Admit that the per foot, per year conduit occupancy rates charged to AT&T by
Qwest under the conduit occupancy licenses attached to the Complaint as Exhibit 3 , and as
expressed in Qwest's invoices attached to the Complaint at Exhibit 6 are not based on Qwest's
incremental costs incurred in accommodating facilities in Qwest's conduit system. "Incremental
costs" consist of those costs that Qwest would not have incurred but for Claimants' facilities
occupying Qwest's conduit.
Admit that the per foot, per year conduit occupancy rates charged to AT&T by
Qwest under the conduit occupancy licenses attached to the Complaint as Exhibit 3 , and as
expressed in Qwest's invoices attached to the Complaint at Exhibit 6 are not based on Claimants
CLAIMANTS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO RESPONDENT Page 3
share of the fully-allocated costs of Qwest's conduit system. "Fully allocated costs" refer to the
total operating expenses and capital costs of owning and maintaining conduits, and include
depreciation, administrative, and maintenance expenses, taxes, and a return on investment at the
authorized rate of return.
Admit that the per foot, per year conduit occupancy rates charged to AT&T by
Qwest under the conduit occupancy licenses attached to the Complaint as Exhibit 3 , and as
expressed in Qwest's invoices attached to the Complaint at Exhibit 6 are not based on an amount
between Qwest's incremental costs incurred in accommodating facilities in Qwest's conduit
system and Claimants' share of the fully-allocated costs of Qwest' s conduit system.
Admit that the per foot, per year conduit occupancy rates charged to AT&T by
Qwest under the conduit occupancy licenses attached to the Complaint as Exhibit 3, and as
expressed in Qwest's invoices attached to the Complaint at Exhibit 6 are not based on Qwest's
conduit capacity, net linear cost of conduit, or carrying charges as expressed above in Request
No.1 and defined in 47 C.R. 9 1.1409(e)(3).
Admit that the per foot, per year conduit occupancy rates charged to AT&T by
Qwest under the conduit occupancy licenses attached to the Complaint as Exhibit 3, and as
expressed in Qwest's invoices attached to the Complaint at Exhibit 6 do not comply with
47 U.C. 9 224.
Admit that in May 2003 , Theresa Atkins, acting on behalf of Qwest
acknowledged that Qwest should be charging Claimants the rates for conduit occupancy
contained in Qwest's Statement of Generally Available Terms & Conditions.
CLAIMANTS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO RESPONDENT Page 4
Respectfully submitted, this 22nd day of November, 2004
AT&T CORP. AND AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE
MOUNTAIN STATES, INC.
Robert M. Pomeroy, Esq. (CSB No. 7640)
HOLLAND & HART, LLP
8390 E. Crescent Parkway
Suite 400
Greenwood Village, CO 80111-2800
Richard Wolters, Esq.
Meredith R. Harris, Esq.
AT&T CORP.
One AT&T Way
Bedminster, New Jersey 07921
T. Scott Thompson, Esq.
Brian M. Josef, Esq.
Rita Tewari, Esq.
COLE, RAYWID& BRAVERMAN, LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.
Second Floor
Washington, D.C. 20006
CLAIMANTS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO RESPONDENT Page 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 22nd day of November, 2004, an original, three (3) true and
correct copies of CLAIMANT'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS were delivered to:
Weldon Stutzman
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
wstutzm~puc. state. i d. us
D U.S. Mail
Electronic Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Telecopy (Fax)
D U.S. Mail
Electronic Mail
fIHand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Telecopy (Fax)
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
jj ewell~puc. state.id.
Mary S. Hobson
Stoel Rives LLP
101 S. Capitol Blvd.
Suite 1900
Boise, Idaho 83702
msho bson~stoel. com
D U.S. Mail
Electronic Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Telecopy (Fax)
Curtis D. McKenzie
Stoel Rives LLP
101 S. Capitol Blvd.
Suite 1900
Boise, Idaho 83702
cdmckenzie~stoel. com
D U.S. Mail
Electronic Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Telecopy (Fax)
Adam L. Sherr
Qwest Corporation
1600 7th Avenue - Room 3206
Seattle, W A 98191
adam.sherr~qwest.com
D U.S. Mail
EElectronic Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Telecopy (Fax)
3306311 I,DOC
CLAIMANTS' FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO RESPONDENT Page 6