Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230131INT to Staff - Response to No. 58-71.pdfRESPONSES TO THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF COMMISSION STAFF PAGE 1 OF 3 Preston N. Carter, ISB No. 8462 Morgan D. Goodin, ISB No. 11184 Blake W. Ringer, ISB No. 11223 Givens Pursley LLP 601 W. Bannock St. Boise, Idaho 83702 Telephone: (208) 388-1200 Facsimile: (208) 388-1300 prestoncarter@givenspursley.com morgangoodin@givenspursley.com blakeringer@givenspursley.com Attorneys for Intermountain Gas Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR NATURAL GAS SERVICE IN THE STATE OF IDAHO Case No. INT-G-22-07 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY’S RESPONSES TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Intermountain Gas Company, (“Intermountain,” “Applicant,” or “Company”), in response to the Third Production Request of the Commission Staff to Intermountain Gas Company dated January 9, 2023, submits the following responses. Responsive documents are available for download using the link provided in the accompanying email. DATED: January 30, 2023. GIVENS PURSLEY LLP Preston N. Carter Attorney for Intermountain Gas Company RECEIVED Monday, January 30, 2023 3:44:34 PM IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION RESPONSES TO THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF COMMISSION STAFF PAGE 2 OF 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on January 30, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon all parties of record in this proceeding via electronic mail as indicated below: Commission Staff Via Electronic Mail Jan Noriyuki, Commission Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg. 8, Suite 201-A Boise, ID 83714 jan.noriyuki@puc.idaho.gov Dayn Hardie Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg. 8, Suite 201-A Boise, ID 83714 dayn.hardie@puc.idaho.gov Chad M. Stokes Cable Huston LLP 1455 SW Broadway, Ste. 1500 Portland, OR 97201 Attorneys for Alliance of Western Energy Consumers cstokes@cablehuston.com Marie Callaway Kellner 710 N. 6th Street Boise, ID 83702 Attorneys for Idaho Conservation League mkellner@idahoconservation.org Brad Heusinkveld Idaho Conservation League, Energy Assoc. 710 N. 6th Street Boise, ID 83702 bheusinkveld@idahoconservation.org Darrell Early Ed Jewell Deputy City Attorney Boise City Attorney’s Office 150 N. Capitol Blvd. PO Box 500 Boise, ID 83701-0500 boisecityattorney@cityofboise.org dearly@cityofboise.org ejewell@cityofboise.org RESPONSES TO THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF COMMISSION STAFF PAGE 3 OF 3 Wil Gehl Energy Program Manager Boise City Dept. of Public Works 150 N. Capitol Blvd. PO Box 500 Boise, ID 83701-0500 wgehl@cityofboise.org Preston N. Carter INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Carmen Goicoechea/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 58: Please describe the self-help options that are available to customers using the Company's Interactive Voice Response system. Please provide the utilization rate for each available option for the past three years (2020, 2021 and 2022). RESPONSE NO. 58: The Company’s Interactive Voice Response (“IVR”) system Self Service Options top menu includes the following options: account balance, last payment amount/date, get mailing address for payments, get our web address to make free payments and other services online, and transfer to our Energy Efficiency group. We do not collect data on these selections. Call data is collected once the call enters one of the Customer Service Queues listed below. Utilization rates for the options that route calls to an agent are as follows: 2020 2021 2022 Report an Emergency - Including Gas Leaks 3.75% 3.40% 3.80% Start or Stop Service 48.88% 48.78% 43.52% Create a Pay Plan 18.49% 22.44% 20.60% Callback Option 5.91% 2.92% 11.03% Other 22.97% 22.46% 21.05% INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 58 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Carmen Goicoechea/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 59: Please describe the self-help options that are available to customers using the Company’s website. For each of the past three years (2020, 2021, and 2022), please provide the utilization rate for each available option and the percentage of Idaho customers that have established an online account? RESPONSE NO. 59: Please see features below on the Customer Web Application. Unique log entries have been provided for each year for each feature. Some stats are not available as we purge those web logs from the database after 12 months. Feature 2020 2021 2022 2020 2021 2022 Total Customers 384,625 395,778 406,806 % of customers % of customers % of customers New Enrollments 50,321 51,172 51,986 13.08% 12.93% 12.78% Total Web Enrollments 231,082 239,545 248,584 60.08% 60.53% 61.11% AutoPay Add 72,584 74,745 75,501 18.87% 18.89% 18.56% AutoPay Remove 8,522 7,547 9,217 2.22% 1.91% 2.27% AutoPay Update 11,955 12,801 14,564 3.11% 3.23% 3.58% One-time Payment 2,307,576 2,426,164 2,452,946 Cancel one- time Payment 6,250 5,261 6,121 1.62% 1.33% 1.50% Bill Routing Update (electronic bill or paper)128,646 31.62% INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 59 Page 1 of 3 Enroll in Level Pay 12,310 10,642 3.20% 2.69% Create a Payment Plan 13,858 11,414 16,731 3.60% 2.88% 13.01% Report a Payment 1,440 1,371 1,603 0.37% 0.35% 0.39% View Statement View Brochures/Inse rts Payment History Usage History Start Service 6,525 1.60% Transfer Service 3,776 0.93% Stop Service 22,405 5.51% Letter of Credit 1,918 0.47% Statement Analysis Statement of Account Update Customer Info (home phone, cell phone, work phone, employer)35,117 8.63% Add Co- customer Update Co- customer Info (home phone, cell phone, work phone, employer)7,003 1.72% Change Mailing Address 8,706 2.14% INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 59 Page 2 of 3 Update Emergency Contact Update Email Address Opt-in/out to Email Notifications (account, outage, company news, energy efficiency)108,996 26.79% Opt-in/out (account, outage)101,961 25.06% Update Web Username 41,964 43,739 40,204 10.91% 11.05% 9.88% Update Web Password 17,082 4.20% Contact Us Survey/Feedba ck Chat 7,452 7,663 5,523 1.94% 1.94% 1.36% INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 59 Page 3 of 3 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Dan Tillis/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 60: Please provide the Company’s performance objectives for handling incoming calls. RESPONSE NO. 60: Intermountain Gas Company’s objective for handling incoming calls is to answer 80% of calls offered within 60 seconds. INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 60 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Dan Tillis/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 61: What steps does the Company take if it fails to meet its performance objectives? RESPONSE NO. 61: If the Company fails to meet the performance objective of answering 80% of calls offered within 60 seconds, it takes the following steps: 1.Review 30-minute intervals to determine if overtime or shift changes are necessary. 2.Adjust shifts and request voluntary overtime as needed based on interval reports and current call volume. 3.Review employee performance to improve deficiencies in attendance, availability, and efficiency to increase individual calls handled. 4.Utilize resources from other departments within the Customer Experience Team – e.g., Customer Support, Credit & Collections, etc. 5.Review staffing levels to determine if the Company needs to hire additional Customer Service Representatives. 6.Assess employee churn to determine what actions the company can take to retain current employees – e.g., increase pay, offer more flexibility, etc. 7.Assess call types to identify opportunities to shift incoming calls to IVR or Web self- service. INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 61 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Carmen Goicoechea/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 62: Please provide the number of incoming calls handled by the customer service call center by month for each of the past three years (2020, 2021 and 2022). RESPONSE NO. 62: The Number of incoming calls handled by the customer service call center are as follows: Month 2020 2021 2022 Jan 31,402 34,699 29,176 Feb 37,300 33,855 19,191 Mar 28,291 44,910 24,384 Apr 21,658 36,334 20,628 May 22,520 31,602 20,798 Jun 28,585 32,234 21,841 Jul 29,952 30,318 19,908 Aug 28,174 30,368 23,558 Sep 30,053 29,829 21,130 Oct 34,163 32,206 21,885 Nov 28,375 29,787 20,632 Dec 32,826 29,689 20,523 INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 62 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Carmen Goicoechea/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 63: Please provide the number of abandoned calls to the customer service call center by month for each of the past three years (2020, 2021 and 2022). “Abandoned calls” are calls that reach the Company’s incoming telephone system, but the calling party terminates the call before speaking with a customer service representative. RESPONSE NO. 63: The number of abandoned calls are as follows: Month 2020 2021 2022 Jan 1,598 3,391 11,606 Feb 1,009 1,691 9,319 Mar 921 3,186 11,407 Apr 414 1,871 8,746 May 506 1,829 5,027 Jun 1,028 2,728 2,784 Jul 1,226 2,328 2,051 Aug 2,139 1,885 3,209 Sep 4,867 2,616 1,637 Oct 15,688 4,706 4,605 Nov 7,130 5,751 3,387 Dec 4,151 6,984 4,667 INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 63 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Carmen Goicoechea/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 64: Please provide the average speed of answer for the customer service call center by month for each of the past three years (2020, 2021, and 2022). “Average speed of answer” is the interval (typically measured in seconds) between when a call reaches the Company’s incoming telephone system and when the call is picked up by a customer service representative. RESPONSE NO. 64: The average speed of answer is as follows: Month 2020 2021 2022 Jan 0:00:35 0:01:20 0:10:05 Feb 0:00:16 0:00:28 0:07:55 Mar 0:00:17 0:00:53 0:07:55 Apr 0:00:04 0:00:37 0:06:58 May 0:00:06 0:00:46 0:03:33 Jun 0:00:18 0:01:27 0:01:28 Jul 0:00:24 0:01:15 0:01:10 Aug 0:01:01 0:00:58 0:01:37 Sep 0:02:57 0:01:37 0:00:35 Oct 0:10:21 0:03:01 0:02:16 Nov 0:04:45 0:04:40 0:01:15 Dec 0:02:06 0:05:11 0:01:37 INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 64 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Carmen Goicoechea/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 65: Please provide the service level for the customer service call center by month for each of the past three years (2020, 2021 and 2022). “Service level” is the percentage of calls answered within a certain number of seconds, e.g., 80% of calls answered within 20 seconds. RESPONSE NO. 65: The service level for the customer service call center is as follows: Month 2020 2021 2022 Jan 87.37%80.44%74.09% Feb 93.85%88.42%72.10% Mar 92.64%83.09%70.34% Apr 99.19%86.86%71.36% May 98.29%81.84%72.65% Jun 92.80%74.46%81.43% Jul 90.50%78.10%84.54% Aug 79.84%81.82%84.50% Sep 64.58%68.33%90.28% Oct 61.42%64.05%74.22% Nov 69.46%58.38%86.20% Dec 72.23%56.87%87.05% INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 65 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Carmen Goicoechea/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 66: Please provide the average number of busy signals reached by parties calling the customer service call center by month for each of the past three years (2020, 2021 and 2022). RESPONSE NO. 66: Currently there is not a way to capture busy signal data as the call would not have reached the Company’s servers. In order to prevent the occurrence of busy signals, the Company converted from a limited primary rate interface that could handle up to approximately 161 inbound calls, to a session initiation protocol service that handles 251 inbound sessions. INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 66 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Dan Tillis/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 67: Please provide the average response time for e-,mail transactions by month for each of the past three years (2020, 2021 and 2022). “Average response time” is the average number of hours from receipt of an e-mail by the Company to sending a substantive response; auto-response acknowledgements do not count as a substantive response. RESPONSE NO. 67: The Company’s email system does not provide email response time data. The Customer Experience Team (“CXT”) prioritizes emails from customers who submit their email inquiry through one of our online portals. While the Company does not know the exact email response time, the CXT generally responds sooner than the 2-business day expectation set for customers in the generic auto-response sent when an email inquiry is submitted. INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 67 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Carmen Goicoechea/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 68: Please provide the average handling time by month for each of the past three years (2020, 2021 and 2022). “Average handling time” is the average amount of time (usually expressed in minutes) it takes for a customer service representative to talk with a customer plus any additional “off-line” time it takes to complete the transaction or fully resolve the customer’s issue(s). RESPONSE NO. 68: The average handling time by month is as follows: Month 2020 2021 2022 Jan 0:08:18 0:08:50 Feb 0:08:15 0:08:51 Mar 0:08:18 0:08:58 Apr 0:08:40 0:09:13 May 0:08:47 0:09:05 Jun 0:08:48 0:09:13 Jul 0:09:10 0:09:08 Aug 0:09:20 0:09:35 Sep 0:09:10 0:09:22 Oct 0:09:30 0:09:38 Nov 0:08:46 0:09:20 0:09:10 Dec 0:08:47 0:09:06 0:08:44 Data prior to November 2020 has been purged from the data server. INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 68 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Carmen Goicoechea/Lori Blattner REQUEST NO. 69: Please provide the first call resolution rate by month for each of the past three years (2020, 2021 and 2022). “First call resolution rate is the percentage of calls where the transaction, inquiry or complaint is resolved upon initial contact with the Company. RESPONSE NO. 69: Intermountain Gas Company does not track First Call Resolution (“FCR”) in the manner described in this request. However, the Company does have a post-call survey process that allows customers to remain on the line to answer three Customer Satisfaction questions. One of those questions asks how many times the customer needed to contact the company to have their inquiry or issue resolved. Part of the call flow process for the Customer Service Representatives is to advise customers of the survey and encourage them to remain on the line to complete the survey. The survey completion rate and FCR rate from that data for the past three years is listed below. The FCR Rate is the percentage of time customers selected “one” for their answer to the FCR question. INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 69 Page 1 of 2 Month % Handled Calls Surveye d - 2020 FCR Rate - 2020 % Handled Calls Surveye d - 2021 FCR Rate - 2021 % Handled Calls Surveyed - 2022 FCR Rate - 2022 Jan 2.5% 73.0% 2.3% 73.0% 8.9% 75.0% Feb 2.0% 75.0% 2.2% 76.0% 14.4% 75.0% Mar 2.8% 73.0% 2.1% 76.0% 14.0% 76.0% Apr 2.2% 71.0% 2.4% 73.0% 14.4% 77.0% May 1.9% 75.0% 2.4% 75.0% 19.9% 79.0% Jun 1.8% 76.0% 5.9% 80.0% 22.3% 79.0% Jul 0.5% 79.0% 10.2% 79.0% 22.0% 80.0% Aug 1.8% 75.0% 11.4% 79.0% 21.9% 77.0% Sep 2.1% 72.0% 7.2% 78.0% 22.3% 78.0% Oct 1.5% 65.0% 9.9% 76.0% 21.0% 75.0% Nov 2.0% 71.0% 8.5% 78.0% 18.8% 76.0% Dec 2.3% 71.0% 8.8% 77.0% 17.1% 77.0% INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 69 Page 2 of 2 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Josh Sanders/Patrick Darras REQUEST NO. 70: Please provide an update on each Action Item listed in the Stipulation and Settlement approved in the Commission Order No. 35492 in Case No. INT-G-22-01. If any Action Item has not been completed, please explain why. RESPONSE NO. 70: Intermountain Gas Company has completed all agreed terms in accordance with the settlement agreement related to Order No.35492. The Company’s last requirement was implemented prior to 12/31/22. The Company’s most recent required quarterly update of progress was submitted to Commission Staff on 1/9/2023. The Company continues to perform quarterly audits of work completions by its Service Technicians to ensure work is being completed by individuals who have documented qualifications. Results have continually improved since the Company began auditing with the most recent audit submitted on 1/10/2023 having zero issues to report out of 38,980 work completions. INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 70 Page 1 of 1 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY CASE INT-G-22-07 THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF Preparer/Sponsoring Witness: Josh Sanders/Patrick Darras REQUEST NO. 71: Please provide all documents and reports related to all safety audits performed on the Company from 2017 to present date. RESPONSE NO. 71: Due to the voluminous nature of the request, the data requested will be provided for inspection on-site at the Company’s offices. INT-G-22-07 IPUC DR 71 Page 1 of 1