Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130822Staff 6-12 to INTG.pdfKARL T. KLEIN DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 (208) 334-0320 IDAHO BAR NO. 5156 Street Address for Express Mail: 472W. WASHINGTON BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5918 Attorneys for the Commission Staff IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE ITS PRICES (2013 PURCHASED GAS COST ADJUSTMENT) i CASE NO.INT.G-13-05 SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY :! r..'i'j BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION The Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its attorney of record, Karl T. Klein, Deputy Attorney General, requests that Intermountain Gas Company (Company) provide the following documents and information as soon as possible, but no later than MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2013.1 This Production Request is to be considered as continuing, and the Company is requested to provide, by way of supplementary responses, additional documents that it or any person acting on its behalf may later obtain that will augment the documents or information produced. Please provide answers to each question, supporting workpapers that provide detail or are the source of information used in calculations, and the name, job title and telephone number of ' Staffis asking for an expedited response, and understands that the Company can produce the requested information by September 9,2013. If the expedited deadline is problematic, please call Staff s attorney at (208) 334-0320. SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST TO INTERMOUNTAIN GAS 1 AUGUST 22,2013 the person preparing the documents. Please identiff the name, job title, location and telephone number of the record holder. In addition to the written copies provided as response to the requests, please provide all Excel and electronic files on CD with formulas activated. REQUEST NO. 6: Please provide the percentage of estimated annual load comprised of index purchases, fixed-price hedges for a term ofone year or less, and fixed-price hedges from previous multi-year contracts. In your response, please include the estimated or actual weighted average prices for each type of procurement contract. REQUEST NO. 7: Please provide the Gas Loss Reports from each line break that occurred during this PGA year. As part of your response, please explain how the reports are used to estimate the quantity of lost gas from each line break. REQUEST NO. 8: Workpaper No. 8 shows annual statistics on lost and unaccounted for gas. Using the same format, please provide the following information: a) the number of meter audits associated with drive rate errors and pressure errors; b) gas loss due to customers having the incorrect meter size installed; c) gas loss from measurement errors related to translating metered consumption to billed consumption; and d) gas loss from measurement differences between Intermountain's distribution system meters and Northwest Pipeline's meters. REQUEST NO. 9: It is known in the industry that Aldyl-A pipe manufactured prior to 1984 is susceptible to cracking under certain circumstances, with pre 1973 Aldyl-A being the most susceptible. Please provide the quantity of lost gas likely due to defects in the pre 1984 Aldyl-A pipe. REQUEST NO. 10: On page 3 of Confidential Workpaper No. 10, please explain why the cost of gas managed by the first referenced gas marketer is consistently more per dekatherm than the gas managed by the second referenced gas marketer. If the difference is because the two SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST TO INTERMOI.INTAIN GAS AUGUST 22,2013 companies manage different types of contracts, please explain why customers benefit from having one company manage the fixed or locked-in prices (physical and option pricing mechanisms), and another manage the first-of-the-month index prices. REQUEST NO. 11: Please explain how the Company estimated the costs of its index purchases. REQUEST NO. 12: For this PGA year, please provide a schedule of the Company's expenses at its Nampa LNG facility. As part of the response, please explain how the funds collected from the sale of LNG were used in accordance with Order No. 32793 (i.e. - Operations and Maintenance of the LNG facility, or LNG facility capital improvements). DATED at Boise, Idaho, tnis Z\/aay of August 2013. fu-ut -Karl T. Klein Deputy Attorney General Technical Staff: Matt Elam/ 6-12 i :umisc:prodreq/intg I 3.5kkme prod req2 SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST TO INTERMOLINTAIN GAS AUGUST 22,2013 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 22*, DAY OF AUGUST 2013, SERVED THE FOREGOING SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFT' TO INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY, IN CASE NO. INT-G-I3-05, BY MAILING A COPY THEREOF, POSTAGE PREPAID, TO THE FOLLOWING: MICHAEL P McGRATH DIR _ REGULATORY AFFAIRS INTERMOUNTAIN GAS CO PO BOX 7608 BOISE TD 83707 EMAIL: mike.mcgrath@intgas.com MORGAN W RICHARDS JR zuCHARDS LAW OFFICE PO BOX 2076 BOISE ID 83701 E-MAIL : mwrlaw@cableone.net SECRETARY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE