20131223AVU to Staff 2-5,7,9,11-13,15,16.pdf

Avista Corp.4111.-
1411 East Mission P.O.Box 3727 iiWISTASpokane.Washington 99220-0500
Telephone [phone] Corp.
Toll Free 800-727-9170
December20,2013
-;::
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 W.Washington St.
Boise,ID 83720-0074
Attn:Karl T.Klein ..
Deputy Attorney General
Re:Production Request of the Commission Staff in Case No.AVU-E-13-09/G-13-02
Dear Mr.Klein,
Enclosed are an original and three copies of Avista’s responses to IPUC Staffs production
requests in the above referenced docket.Included in this mailing are Avista’s responses to
production requests 02,03,04,05,07,09,11,12,13,15,and 16.The electronic versions of the
responses were emailed on 12/20/13 and are also being provided in electronic format on the CD
included in this mailing.
Also included are Avista’s CONFIDENTIAL responses to PR 04C.This response contains
TRADE SECRET,PROPRIETARY or CONFIDENTIAL information and is separately filed
under IDAPA 31.01.01,Rule 067 and 233,and Section 9-340D,Idaho Code.It is being
provided under a sealed separate envelope,marked CONFIDENTIAL.
If there are any questions regarding the enclosed information,please contact Paul Kimball at
[phone] or via e-mail at paul.kimba1lavistacorp.com
Sincerely,
Paul Kimball
Regulatory Analyst
Enclosures
CC (Email):IPUC (Klein,English,Donohue)
AVISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/2013
CASE NO:AVU-E-13 -09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Ryan Finesilver
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:Rates &Tariffs
REQUEST NO.:Staff-02 TELEPHONE:[phone]
REQUEST:
Please provide the Rider revenue by year and by class for the years 2010-2012.
RESPONSE:
Please see Staff PR 02 Attachment A.
Idaho DSM Rider Revenue
SCHEDULE 2010 2011 2012
Electric
001 $2,925,660.66 $2,978,996.63 $2,652,393.85
011 $877,703.04 $905,292.40 $885,365.85
012 $60,811.70 $64,727.51 $61,458.26
021 $1,577,729.17 $1,603,134.71 $1,442,677.42
022 $29,602.10 $28,976.56 $24,654.65
25P $1,176,631.44 $1,225,739.80 $1,104,463.38
025 $453,014.64 $528,090.71 $405,460.10
031 $115,607.54 $119,326.76 $112,942.96
032 $13,838.60 $14,311.96 $11,489.00
41-46 $79,995.65 $79,452.72 $78,882.46
047 $5,321.50 $4,856.86 $4,472.26
048 $9,536.44 $9,094.92 $8,726.52
049 $22,287.16 $21,664.85 $21,396.39
$7,347,739.64 $7,583,666.39 $6,820,383.10
Gas
101 $2,100,744.50 $2,813,051.90 $1,059,637.06
111 $646,906.88 $873,833.47 $214,963.08
112 $9,192.08 $8,900.45 $2,828.62
131 $-$491.81 $577.75
132 $12,185.04 $17,039.86 $6183.99
$2,769,028.50 $3,713,317.49 $1,284,190.50
Total $10,116,768.14 $11,296,983.88 $8,104,573.60
Staff_P R_02 Attachment A.xlsx Page 1 of 1
AVISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/20 13
CASE NO:AVU-E-1 3-09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Ryan finesilver
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:Rates &Tariffs
REQUEST NO.:$taff-03 TELEPHONE:[phone]
REQUEST:
Please provide the calculation of any carrying charge on the Rider balance for the years
2010-20 12.
RESPONSE:
The Company accrues interest on the Idaho Electric DSM Program balance,when the balance has
a credit balance (when the Company has collected more from customers that it has spent).There is
no interest accrued when more dollars have been spent than collected.
The interest calculation is based on the average balance of the program cost for the two preceding
months and is at a rate of 8.9%in the state of Idaho.In months where the average balance is not a
credit balance,no interest is charged.
Please see $taff_PR_03 Attachment A for the calculation ofthe monthly interest charged on DSM
rider balances.
Calculation of Electric Energy Efficiency Rider Balance With Interest
Beg.Balance Expenditures
Dec/09 $2,391,464 $672,785
End.Balance 8.9%
Revenue w/o Interest Interest
$(710,688)$2,353,561
End.Balance
w/Interest
2,353,561.06
Expenditures
$441,361
$268,105
$343,406
$611,813
$226,469
$592,725
$491,720
$665,678
$1,263,784
$1,125,271
$655,414
$564,794
End.Balance
Revenue w/o Interest
(766,353)$125,880
(702,367)$(308,382)
(851,727)$(816,703)
(533,786)$(739,353)
(608,821)$(1,125,879)
(554,418)$(1,093,361)
(567,444)$(1,176,039)
(596,613)$(1,115,251)
(617,244)$(477,183)
(562,848)$76,681
(610,107)$116,019
(735,990)$(56,716)
End.Balance
w/Interest
125,879.59
(308,382.20)
(817,380.04)
(743,527.32)
(1,131,667.71)
(1,100,314.39)
(1,184,315.98)
(1,123,723.18)
(485,741.79)
70,712.42
114,480.19
(56,715.67)
No interest was accrued for months in which the average balance of the preceding month was not a credit balance.
Jan/10 $
Feb/10 $
Mar/10 $
Apr/10 $
May/10 $
Jun/10 $
Jul/10 $
Aug/10 $
Sep/10 $
Oct/10 $
Nov/10 $
Dec/10 $
2,353,561
2,401,808
1,993,442
1,883,749
1,531,515
1,365,119
1,246,278
1,110,565
900,094
679,754
627,506
707,198
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
811,065
270,696
509,996
270,921
434,828
438,518
432,351
400,367
368,584
486,871
545,115
475,700
$(762,818)$
$(679,062)$
$(619,689)$
$(623,154)$
$(601,225)$
$(557,359)$
$(568,063)$
$(610,838)$
$(588,925)$
$(539,119)$
$(465,423)$
$(732,026)$
2,401,808
1,993,442
1,883,749
1,531,515
1,365,119
1,246,278
1,110,565
900,094
679,754
627,506
707,198
450,872
-2,401,807.77
-1,993,442.30
-1,883,748.87
-1,531,515.36
-1,365,118.95
-1,246,277.67
-1,110,564.94
-900,094.33
-679,753.60
-627,506.01
707,197.62
450,871.79
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8.9%
Interest
(676.78)
(4,174.70)
(5788.36)
(6953.85)
(8,276.93)
(8,472.17)
(6,556.98)
(5,968.43)
(1,539.07)
$(50,409)
Beg.Balance
Jan/il $450,872
Feb/li $125,880
Mar/li $(308,382)
Apr/li $(817,380)
May/li $(743,527)
Jun/li $(1,131,668)
Jul/il $(1,100,314)
Aug/li $(1,184,316)
Sep/li $(1,123,723)
Oct/11 $(485,742)
Nov/11 $70,712
Dec/il $114,480
Beg.Balance
Jan/12 $(56,716)
Feb/12 $185,503
Mar/12 $122,595
Apr/12 $(90,251)
May/12 $(65,561)
Jun/12 $(48,261)
Jul/12 $291,470
Aug/12 $117,388
Sep/12 $(90,423)
Oct/12 $(372,621)
Nov/12 $121,420
Dec/12 $361,926
End.Balance 8.9%
Revenue w/o Interest Interest
$(67,122)$185,503
Expenditures
$309,341
$629,188
$439,028
$648,927
$591,394
$890,393
$402,724
$417,362
$326,812
$943,854
$596,686
$1,105,129
(577.81)
(422.09)
$(692,096)$
$(651,874)$
$(624,237)$
$(573,516)$
$(550,240)$
$(576,806)$
$(625,173)$
$(609,070)$
$(448,036)$
$(355,248)$
$(361,005)$
122,595
(90,251)
(65,561)
(47,684)
291,892
117,388
(90,423)
(372,681)
123,137
362,858
1,106,050
End.Balance
_______
w/Interest
185,503.03
122,594.63
(90,251.43)
(65,561.45)
(48,261.34)
291,470.04
117,388.39
(90,422.55)
(1,717.34)(372,680.58)
(931.76)121,419.78
-361,925.76
-1,106,049.86
$(3,649)
Staff_PRO3 Attachment A.xlsx Page 1 of 1
AVISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/20 13
CASE NO:AVU-E-13-09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:Lori Hermanson
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Mark Baker
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:Energy Solutions
REQUEST NO.:Staff-04 TELEPHONE:[phone]
REQUEST:
Please provide a list of all external consulting and evaluation fees paid from the rider during
2010-2012.Please indicate how any of those expenses were allocated between jurisdictions.
RESPONSE:
Please see Avist&s response 04C,which contains TRADE SECRET,PROPRIETARY or
CONFIDENTIAL information and exempt from public view and is separately filed under
IDAPA 3 1.01.01,Rule 067 and 233,and Section 9-340D,Idaho Code.
Staff_PR_04C Confidential Attachment A -External Consulting &Evaluation fees 2010 —2012
contains the information requested including the allocation of expenses specifically to Idaho.
AVISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/2013
CASE NO:AVU-E-13-09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Lori Hermanson
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:DSM Policy,Planning &Analysis
REQUEST NO.:Staff-05 TELEPHONE:[phone]
REQUEST:
Please provide ajustification of funding for the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (“NEEA”).
Please include all savings attributed to Avista’s Idaho jurisdiction from NEEA for each year
(2010-2012),alone with amounts paid to NEEA as a part ofthe current cycle funding agreement.
Please report the savings for each year:1)based on funding allocation,and 2)based on sales data
for Avista’s Idaho service territory.
RESPONSE:
Avista’s local portfolio consists of programs and supporting infrastructure designed to enhance
and accelerate the penetration of energy efficiency measures through a combination of financial
incentives,teclmical assistance,program outreach and education.It is generally not feasible for
Avista,or any individual utility,to independently have a meaningful impact upon regional or
national markets due to the lack of economies of scale and the ‘leakage’ofbenefits to other utility
service territories.
Consequently,utilities within the Pacific Northwest have cooperatively worked together to
develop the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA)to address those opportunities that are
beyond the ability of individual utilities to achieve.Avista has been a participating and funding
member of NEEA since the 1997 founding of the organization.
Avista’s criteria for funding NEEA’s electric market transformation portfolio calls for the
portfolio to deliver incrementally cost-effective resources beyond what could be achieved through
the Company’s local portfolio alone.The Company believes that these criteria will continue to be
met in the foreseeable future.
1).The savings attributable to Avista’s Idaho service territory for 2010-2012 are 1.44 aMW or
0.48 aMW (2010),0.49 aMW (2011)and 0.47 aMW (2012).
2).The amounts paid to NEEA for the Idaho portion of NEEA funding is $1,771,634 or
$569,651 (2010),$527,706 (2011)and $674,277 (2011).
Please see Staff_PR_OS Attachments A and B for memos from NEEA with details by funding
allocation and sales data.
>>Memorandum
June 27,2012
TO:Jon Powell,Avista Corporation
CC:Jeff Harris,director,Emerging Technology;Susan Hermenet,NEEA Senior Manager of
Market Operations Planning
FROM:Christina Steinhoff,Planning Analyst Ill
SUBJECT:2010 &2011 NEEA Service Territory Savings Report
BBs SBBBBSB as Baa.,.Ba Be BSB•as...,..as..a i a.B.a......C C S BBSa BBS.as BBS B UBSa a a •a ama
This memo summarizes the 2010 &2011 NEEA Service Territory Savings Report for Avista’s Idaho
service territory.The savings estimates apply NEEA’s baseline and service-territory share
assumptions.’This memo starts with a summary of the results then explains the allocation
methodology and updates to the 2010 savings estimates.
Summary of Idaho Results
Avista Idaho’s Total Regional Savings is 2.8 aMW for 2010-2011.Approximately 1.8 aMW of the
savings are a part of Avista’s utility programs or a part of a growing baseline (Naturally Occurring
Baseline).2 The difference between the Total RegionalSavings,Local Program Savings,and the
Naturally Occurring Baseline is 1.0 aMW.Table 1 shows the results by year.
1 NEEA presented these assumptions to the Cost Effectiveness Advisory Committee on June 13,2012.They are
available upon request at [e-mail] or 503-688-5427.
2LocaI Programs:Avista reported in March 2012 its local program savings for 2010 and 2011.Avista split the incentives
by Washington and Idaho.NEEA normalized the units for initiatives where Avista reported incentives in kWh-yr.saved.
Specifically,NEEA made this adjustment for Drive Power.The reported local program units are available in the Excel
spreadsheet that goes with this memo.Naturally Occurring Baseline:is an estimate of energy savings that would occur
in a market without any intervention by NEEA,a utility,BPA,and/or the Trust.
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
421 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 600,Portland,CR97204
503.688.5400 I Fax [phone]
neea.org [e-mail]
Staff_P R_05 Attachment A Page 1 of 6
Table 1:2010 &2011 NEEA Service Territory Savings Report for Avista’s Idaho Service Territory
Avista Corporation,Inc.’s NEFA Service Tern tory Savings Report
Avista Corporation,Inc.’s NEEA savings 2010 2011 2010/2OllTotaI
Report (ID)
Local Incentives 0.22 0.13 0.36
Naturally Occurring Baseline 0.67 0.7$1.45
Net Market Effects 0.48 0.49 0.97
Note:the results may not odd up because of rounding.
Savings Allocation Methodology
NEEA uses one of four methods to allocate the savings to Avista’s Idaho territory.3 Table 2
describes the methodologies,which range from service-territory savings reports to funder share
allocation.4 NEEA allocates approximately 63%of the 2011 Net Market Effects to Avista using zip
code or service-territory data.
NEEA can also use a “funder specified”method if Avista has better data to support an alternative allocation.
NEEA uses state or regional savings rates.
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance -2 -
Staff_PR_05 Attachment A Page 2 of 6
Ta
b
l
e
2;
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
NE
E
A
us
e
s
a
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ma
p
p
i
n
g
Sy
s
t
e
m
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
th
e
po
i
n
t
-
o
f
-
s
a
l
e
,
zi
p
-
c
o
d
e
da
t
a
.
Th
e
ma
p
p
i
n
g
sy
s
t
e
m
ag
g
r
e
g
a
t
e
s
th
e
zi
p
-
c
o
d
e
da
t
a
in
t
o
ma
r
k
e
t
re
g
i
o
n
s
,
wh
i
c
h
ar
e
an
ag
g
r
e
g
a
t
i
o
n
of
co
u
n
t
i
e
s
,
an
d
ap
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
to
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
i
e
s
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
sh
a
r
e
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
ac
c
o
u
n
t
s
in
th
e
ma
r
k
e
t
re
g
i
o
n
.
Th
e
nu
m
b
e
r
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
ac
c
o
u
n
t
s
is
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
EI
A
Fo
r
m
-
8
6
1
Fi
n
a
l
Da
t
a
Fi
l
e
fo
r
20
1
0
.
Th
e
in
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
th
e
to
t
a
l
cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
to
th
e
ma
r
k
e
t
re
g
i
o
n
s
.
NE
E
A
us
e
s
a
No
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ma
p
p
i
n
g
Sy
s
t
e
m
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
th
e
po
i
n
t
-
o
f
-
s
a
l
e
,
zi
p
-
c
o
d
e
da
t
a
.
Th
e
ma
p
p
i
n
g
sy
s
t
e
m
ag
g
r
e
g
a
t
e
s
th
e
zi
p
-
c
o
d
e
da
t
a
in
t
o
ma
r
k
e
t
re
g
i
o
n
s
an
d
ap
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
to
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
i
e
s
ba
s
e
d
on
no
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
lo
a
d
.
Th
e
no
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
lo
a
d
is
To
t
a
l
Sa
l
e
s
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Sa
l
e
s
-
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Sa
l
e
s
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
EI
A
Fo
r
m
-
8
6
1
Fi
n
a
l
Da
t
a
Fi
l
e
fo
r
20
1
0
.
Th
e
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
th
e
to
t
a
l
cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
to
th
e
ma
r
k
e
t
re
g
i
o
n
s
.
NE
E
A
us
e
s
a
Di
r
e
c
t
Pl
a
c
e
of
Us
e
Ma
p
p
i
n
g
Sy
s
t
e
m
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
wh
e
n
NE
E
A
ha
s
a
zi
p
-
co
d
e
pl
a
c
e
of
us
e
.
Th
e
sy
s
t
e
m
lo
o
k
s
up
th
e
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
wi
t
h
i
n
a
zi
p
co
d
e
an
d
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
to
a
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
.
NE
E
A
wi
l
l
co
n
t
a
c
t
th
e
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
if
a
zi
p
co
d
e
ha
s
mo
r
e
th
a
n
on
e
se
r
v
i
c
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
r
.
Th
e
zi
p
co
d
e
li
s
t
wi
t
h
th
e
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
ut
i
l
i
t
y
pr
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
co
m
e
s
fr
o
m
th
e
BP
A
.
Po
w
e
l
l
,
Jo
n
.
Ma
r
c
h
20
1
2
.
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
wi
t
h
io
n
Po
w
e
l
l
,
DS
M
An
a
l
y
s
t
,
fo
r
Av
i
s
t
a
.
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
En
e
r
g
y
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Al
l
i
a
n
c
e
42
1
SW
Si
x
t
h
Av
e
n
u
e
,
Su
i
t
e
60
0
,
Po
r
t
l
a
n
d
,
OR
97
2
0
4
50
3
.
6
8
8
.
5
4
0
0
I
Fa
x
50
3
.
6
8
8
.
5
4
4
7
ne
e
a
.
o
r
g
I
in
f
o
@
n
e
e
a
.
o
r
g
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
of
Av
i
s
t
a
ID
’
s
20
1
1
To
t
a
l
Me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
NE
E
A
is
ab
l
e
to
tr
a
c
k
en
e
r
g
y
sa
v
i
n
g
s
by
ut
i
l
i
t
y
fo
r
so
m
e
in
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
tP
o
i
n
t
of
Sa
t
e
)
Zi
p
Co
d
e
!
Co
u
n
t
y
5%
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
tP
o
i
n
t
of
Sa
t
e
)
Pl
a
c
e
of
Us
e
57
%
Th
e
“s
t
a
t
e
”
op
t
i
o
n
is
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
wh
e
n
NE
E
A
on
l
y
ha
s
st
a
t
e
-
l
e
v
e
l
da
t
a
.
NE
E
A
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
St
a
t
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
ba
s
e
d
on
Av
i
s
t
a
’
s
sh
a
r
e
of
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ac
c
o
u
n
t
s
(8
.
2
%
)
or
sh
a
r
e
of
no
n
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
lo
a
d
f
6.
4
%
)
.
21
%
In
fe
w
ca
s
e
s
,
NE
E
A
on
l
y
ha
s
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
da
t
a
.
Th
e
be
s
t
me
t
h
o
d
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
is
by
Fu
n
d
e
r
Sh
a
r
e
fu
n
d
e
r
sh
a
r
e
.
Fo
r
Av
i
s
t
a
,
NE
E
A
ap
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
70
%
of
it
s
fu
n
d
e
r
sh
a
r
e
to
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
an
d
30
%
to
Id
a
h
o
.
5
16
%
St
a
f
f
_
P
R
_
0
5
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
A
Pa
g
e
3
of
6
NE
E
A
us
e
s
a
va
r
i
e
t
y
of
th
e
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
in
Ta
b
l
e
2
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
to
Av
i
s
t
a
.
In
a
fe
w
ca
s
e
s
,
NE
E
A
ap
p
l
i
e
s
mo
r
e
th
a
n
on
e
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
.
Ta
b
l
e
3
sh
o
w
s
th
e
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
by
in
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
.
Ta
b
l
e
3:
Me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
fo
r
th
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
Ho
m
e
s
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
NE
E
A
ha
s
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
da
t
a
.
NE
E
A
ha
s
zi
p
-
c
o
d
e
sa
l
e
s
fo
r
a
si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
sh
a
r
e
of
qu
a
l
i
f
y
i
n
g
te
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
f>
46
0
,
0
0
0
in
Te
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
Zi
p
Co
d
e
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
20
1
1
)
.
NE
E
A
us
e
s
th
i
s
da
t
a
an
d
it
s
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ma
p
p
i
n
g
Sy
s
t
e
m
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
.
NE
E
A
ha
s
se
r
v
i
c
e
-
t
e
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
da
t
a
fo
r
a
ma
j
o
r
i
t
y
of
th
e
in
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
st
a
t
e
da
t
a
fo
r
th
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
(t
h
e
no
n
-
i
n
c
e
n
t
e
d
in
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
)
.
NE
E
A
us
e
s
th
e
st
a
t
e
sh
a
r
e
of
th
e
Du
c
t
l
e
s
s
He
a
t
Pu
m
p
s
an
d
St
a
t
e
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
ac
c
o
u
n
t
s
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
fo
r
th
e
no
n
-
i
n
c
e
n
t
e
d
un
i
t
s
.
Ot
h
e
r
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Co
d
e
s
St
a
t
e
20
1
1
NE
E
A
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
us
i
n
g
th
e
sh
a
r
e
of
st
a
t
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
ac
c
o
u
n
t
s
.
NE
E
A
ha
s
zi
p
-
c
o
d
e
da
t
a
fo
r
a
ma
j
o
r
i
t
y
of
sa
l
e
s
.
NE
E
A
us
e
s
it
s
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ma
p
p
i
n
g
Sy
s
t
e
m
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
fr
o
m
th
e
s
e
sa
l
e
s
.
Fo
r
sp
e
c
i
a
l
t
y
bu
l
b
s
,
NE
E
A
ap
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
th
e
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
sa
l
e
s
us
i
n
g
th
e
sa
m
e
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
as
th
e
no
n
-
i
n
c
e
n
t
e
d
,
zi
p
-
c
o
d
e
sa
l
e
s
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
Zi
p
Co
d
e
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
da
t
a
.
NE
E
A
ha
s
to
t
a
l
ap
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
sa
l
e
s
da
t
a
by
co
u
n
t
y
fo
r
20
1
1
an
d
by
st
a
t
e
fo
r
20
1
0
.
NE
E
A
20
1
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
,
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
20
1
1
sa
v
i
n
g
s
us
i
n
g
it
s
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ma
p
p
i
n
g
Sy
s
t
e
m
an
d
th
e
20
1
0
sa
v
i
n
g
s
Ap
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
s
St
a
t
e
/
C
o
u
n
t
y
20
1
1
(C
o
u
n
t
y
)
us
i
n
g
th
e
sh
a
r
e
of
st
a
t
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
ac
c
o
u
n
t
s
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
So
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
NE
E
A
ha
s
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
da
t
a
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Re
a
l
Es
t
a
t
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
NE
E
A
ha
s
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
da
t
a
.
He
a
l
t
h
c
a
r
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
NE
E
A
ha
s
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
da
t
a
.
NE
E
A
ha
s
zi
p
-
c
o
d
e
sa
l
e
s
fo
r
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
10
%
of
th
e
de
s
k
t
o
p
sh
i
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
Th
i
s
sh
a
r
e
wa
s
to
o
sm
a
l
l
to
us
e
fo
r
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
As
a
re
s
u
l
t
,
NE
E
A
us
e
s
th
e
fu
n
d
e
r
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
IT
Fu
n
d
e
r
Sh
a
r
e
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
sh
a
r
e
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Co
d
e
s
St
a
t
e
20
1
1
NE
E
A
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
sh
a
r
e
of
no
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
lo
a
d
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
st
a
t
e
s
.
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
Op
e
r
a
t
o
r
Ce
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
St
a
t
e
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
NE
E
A
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
sh
a
r
e
of
no
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
lo
a
d
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
st
a
t
e
s
.
NE
E
A
ha
s
st
a
t
e
da
t
a
fo
r
20
0
9
an
d
a
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
es
t
i
m
a
t
e
of
20
1
0
-
2
0
1
1
sa
v
i
n
g
s
.
NE
E
A
Dr
i
v
e
Po
w
e
r
St
a
t
e
20
0
9
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
20
0
9
sh
a
r
e
of
no
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
lo
a
d
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
st
a
t
e
s
.
Dr
i
v
e
Po
w
e
r
Re
w
i
n
d
s
St
a
t
e
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
NE
E
A
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
sh
a
r
e
of
no
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
lo
a
d
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
st
a
t
e
s
.
NE
E
A
ha
s
zi
p
co
d
e
pl
a
c
e
of
us
e
da
t
a
.
NE
E
A
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
ut
i
l
i
t
y
AM
4
0
0
Da
t
a
Lo
g
g
e
r
Zi
p
Co
d
e
20
1
0
,
20
1
1
pr
o
v
i
d
e
r
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
zi
p
co
d
e
.
Ma
g
n
a
Dr
i
v
e
St
a
t
e
20
1
0
NE
E
A
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
sh
a
r
e
of
no
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
lo
a
d
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
st
a
t
e
s
.
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
En
e
r
g
y
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Al
l
i
a
n
c
e
-4
-
St
a
f
f
_
P
R_
0
5
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
A
Pa
g
e
4
of
6
Ye
a
r
of
Da
t
a
In
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
Me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
So
u
r
c
e
Me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
I
Ye
a
r
of
Da
t
a
In
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
Me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
So
u
r
c
e
Me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
g
Fu
n
d
e
r
Sh
a
r
e
20
1
0
,
2
0
1
0
NE
E
A
on
l
y
ha
s
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
da
t
a
.
As
a
re
s
u
l
t
,
NE
E
A
us
e
s
a
fu
n
d
e
r
sh
a
r
e
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Se
r
v
i
c
e
NE
E
A
ha
s
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
da
t
a
fo
r
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
15
%
of
th
e
20
1
1
sa
v
i
n
g
s
.
Th
e
Te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
/
F
u
n
d
e
r
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
sa
v
i
n
g
s
is
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
ba
s
e
d
on
fu
n
d
e
r
sh
a
r
e
.
NE
E
A
is
wo
r
k
i
n
g
to
im
p
r
o
v
e
th
i
s
Fo
o
d
Pr
o
c
e
s
s
o
r
s
Sh
a
r
e
20
1
0
/
2
0
1
1
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
.
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
En
e
r
g
y
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Al
l
i
a
n
c
e
5-
St
a
f
f
_
P
R_
0
5
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
A
Pa
g
e
5
of
6
Variance from the July 2011 NEEA Service Territory Savings Report
The 2010 Total Regional Savings are the same as NEEA reported in July 2011.However,the
components of the savings have changed.NEEA updated the 2010 values based on new data
ranging from new service territory information to an update to the tracked units.The overall
updates had little effect on the total savings.
Contributing to the savings:
•80 Plus:NEEA purchased IDC market share and market size data to better measure
the savings.Previously,NEEA mostly relied on program data and third-party evaluations to
estimates sales of ENERGY Star 5.0 commercial desktops.The new data from IDC and the
updated market share information from a Market Progress Evaluation Report6 (which
provided a new 2010 market share)showed that NEEA was underestimating the saving.
•Drive Power:NEEA was able to verify a methodology to track savings from motor
rewinds—a measure a part of the Drive Power Initiative.
•Codes:Previously,NEEA did not report code savings at the service territory level.This year,
NEEA allocated the savings to Avista based on the residential customer accounts
(residential codes)or non-residential load (commercial codes)within the state.
•Appliances:Previously,NEEA did not allocate savings from clothes washers,dishwashers,
and refrigerators to a service territory.Now,NEEA is allocating those 2010 savings based
on Avista’s state share of the residential customer accounts.
Deducting from the savings:
•Commercial Buildings:NEEA revised its estimate of savings for Building Operations.The
savings NEEA reported in July 2011 for 2010 were estimations that evaluators deemed as
reasonable.As a result,NEEA agreed to report the results prior to a full evaluation review.
A subsequent full review of the 2010 savings by a third party7 led to a downward
adjustment for Avista Idaho.NEEA now requires a full review of the savings estimates prior
to reporting results.
•Lighting:NEEA collected new retailer sales data for 2011 that led to a revised 2010 sales
estimate.The Total Regional Savings estimate from lighting declined by 0.06 aMW.
6 Navigant Consulting.2012.2011 Market Progress Evaluation Report.
Kilowatt Crackdown Billing Analysis Results.Memo from Research Into Action.November 18,2011.
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
421 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 600,Portland,OR 97204
503.688.5400 I Fax [phone]
neea.org I [e-mail]
Staff_P R_05 Attachment A Page 6 of 6
Memorandum
May 30,2013 i4ieea
TO:ion Powell,DSM Analyst,Avista Corporation
CC:Stephanie Rider,Senior Manager,NEEA Planning;Susan Hermenet,Director of
Research,Planning &Evaluation
FROM:Christina Steinhoff,Planning Analyst Ill
SUBJECT:2012 Annual Savings Report (Idaho)
s,Bw.,.B.RMB,a.Iaw,swB.r,.I.sa,...,...M,...,KI.,wa.,..e..w.a..me
The Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA)is a non-profit organization that accelerates the
innovation and adoption of energy-efficient products,services,and practices in the Northwest.
NEEA is supported by Energy Trust of Oregon (Energy Trust),Bonneville Power Administration
(Bonneville),and more than 100 Northwest utilities on behalf of 12 million energy consumers.
NEEA has multiple value streams associated with its work;but the focus of this memo is on the
final 2012 estimate of electric energy savings for the Avista Corporation Idaho.The attached Excel
spreadsheet details the calculations
2012 Savings Summary
NEEA estimates Avista Idaho’s 2012 share of annual electric energy savings associated with its
initiatives is 0.47 aMW (Table 1).These savings are above the NEEA baseline1 and not counted as
part of Avista Idaho’s local program savings.2
1 NEEA estimates Baseline as the savings that would have occurred without NEEA,utility,the Bonneville,and the
Energy Trust’s market intervention.
2 NEEA estimates the share of energy savings claimed through Bonneville,Energy Trust and local utilities based on
program data an on NEEA’s annual survey of local utility programs.
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
421 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 600,Portland,OR 97204
503.688.5400 j Fax [phone]
neea.org I [e-mail]
Staff_PR_05 Attachment B Page 1 of 4
Table 1:2012 Annual Report Savings Estimate faMW)
Avista
Corporation 2011 2012
Idaho
Total Regional Net Market Total Regional Net Market
Savings Effects Savings Effects
Otal 144 051 135 047
Residential 1.16 -0.30.1.08 0.28
Commercial 0.15 0.12,0.15 0.11
lndustry+Ag 0.14 0.09 0.12 0.07
Note:These ore site-bosed savings.
Variance from Prior Reports
2011 Annual Report
The 2011 Net Market Effects increased by 4%(+0.02 aMW)from the 2011 Annual Report
estimates.Most of the increase came from Commercial Codes (+0.01 aMW)and Building Operator
Certification (+0.01 a MW).
•Commercial Codes:NEEA updated the new construction square footage based on data
available after the 2011 Annual Report.
•Building Operator Certification:The 2011 annual report attempted to estimate
“retirements”of prior certifications at a service territory level based on historical
certificates.In general,NEEA does not track retirements by service territory because either
the information was not available prior to 2010 or the quality of the information has some
uncertainty.For consistency,NEEA is distributing the retirements for Building Operator
Certification based on the service-territory share of the new certificates.
-2-
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
Staff_PR_05 Attachment B Page 2 of 4
Methodology Outline
Table 2 lists general assumptions for Avista Idaho’s savings reports.
Table 2:Methodology Outline
Methodology
Savings Type Net Market Effects
Site Based Yes
Period Calendar year
Baseline NEEA baseline (based on third-party research)
Allocation Service Territory (when available)
Baseline
This report follows NEEA’s method of measuring electric energy savings from market
transformation efforts.The baseline is an estimate of the market adoption without intervention
by NEEA,Bonneville,the Energy Trust and utilities.Prior to reporting the savings above the
baseline,NEEA removes the savings counted through the local programs.This effort avoids double
counting energy savings.
Allocation
NEEA allocates the savings to Avista Idaho using the most disaggregated data available.The data
sources can range from service-territory level to regional.The enclosed spreadsheet lists the
allocation method by measure.It also shows the allocation as a percent of the regional savings.
When NEEA only has regional data,NEEA allocates the savings to using funding shares.NEEA
applies the funder shares to savings by initiatives based on the initiative start,which fall into either
“current investments”or “previous investments”categories (Table 3).
Table 3:Funder Allocation
Current Investments Previous Investments
Avista Idaho 1.19%1.68%
Note:NEEA estm7ates Avista Idaho’sfun der shate as 30%ofAvista ‘s totalfunder share.
Report Design
Each Excel report has three worksheets.
1.The Funder Report Table:This worksheet summarizes the savings report.
2.Report Detail:This worksheet provides background information to support the savings
results provided in the Funder Report Table (Figure 1).
3.Savings by Initiative:This worksheet provides the savings by initiative.
Please Contact Christina Steinhoff at 503-688-5427 with any questions about the spreadsheet.
-3-
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
Staff_PR_05 Attachment B Page 3 of 4
20
1
2
5
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ph
a
s
e
5:
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ph
a
s
e
6:
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
(I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
s
in
ph
a
s
e
s
pr
i
o
r
to
fi
v
e
ha
v
e
a
hi
g
h
va
r
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
in
th
e
i
r
fo
r
e
c
a
s
t
s
)
.
/
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Sh
a
r
e
:
Sh
a
r
e
of
th
e
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
sa
v
i
n
g
s
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
.
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
:
De
t
a
i
l
s
ab
o
u
t
th
e
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
.
Re
t
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Un
i
t
s
th
a
t
ar
e
re
p
l
a
c
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
th
a
t
NE
E
A
ha
s
al
r
e
a
d
y
tr
a
c
k
e
d
(b
a
s
e
d
on
me
a
s
u
r
e
li
f
e
)
.
Tr
a
c
k
e
d
Un
i
t
s
Al
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
to
Eu
n
d
e
r
:
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Sh
a
r
e
mu
l
t
i
p
l
i
e
d
by
th
e
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Un
i
t
s
.
Ne
t
Ma
r
k
e
t
Ef
f
e
c
t
s
:
el
e
c
t
r
i
c
sa
v
i
n
g
s
no
t
co
u
n
t
e
d
as
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
or
Lo
c
a
l
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
(N
e
t
Un
i
t
s
mu
l
t
i
p
l
i
e
d
by
th
e
sa
v
i
n
g
s
ra
t
e
co
n
v
e
r
t
e
d
to
Ne
t
Un
i
t
s
:
Un
i
t
s
ne
t
of
Re
t
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
an
d
Lo
c
a
l
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
Un
i
t
s
.
Lo
c
a
l
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Un
i
t
s
:
Un
i
t
s
cl
a
i
m
e
d
by
Bo
n
n
e
v
i
l
l
e
,
th
e
En
e
r
g
y
Tr
u
s
t
,
an
d
lo
c
a
l
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
:
Us
e
s
st
a
t
e
,
zi
p
co
d
e
(p
l
a
c
e
of
us
e
or
po
i
n
t
of
sa
l
e
)
or
se
r
v
i
c
e
te
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
da
t
a
.
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Ra
t
e
:
Us
e
s
sa
v
i
n
g
s
Fu
n
d
e
r
Sh
a
r
e
:
Us
e
s
fu
n
d
i
n
g
sh
a
r
e
of
ra
t
e
ba
s
e
d
on
be
s
t
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
NE
E
A
to
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
sa
v
i
n
g
s
.
da
t
a
(r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
by
th
i
r
d
pa
r
t
y
)
\
aM
W
)
Fi
g
u
r
e
1:
Il
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
of
Re
p
o
r
t
De
t
a
i
l
Wo
r
k
s
h
e
e
t
Tr
a
c
k
e
d
Ne
t
To
t
a
l
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ph
a
s
e
NE
E
A
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Un
i
t
s
Lo
c
a
l
Ma
r
k
e
t
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
(I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ra
t
e
(k
w
h
?
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
Al
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
NE
E
A
‘i
Ef
f
e
c
t
s
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
Ye
a
r
Cif
e
c
y
c
l
e
)
Se
c
t
o
r
In
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
Me
a
s
u
r
e
s
Me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
Sh
a
r
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
un
i
t
)
Un
i
t
s
to
Fu
n
d
e
r
Un
i
t
s
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
Re
t
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ne
t
Un
i
t
s
(a
M
W
)
fa
t
s
-
l
W
)
20
1
2
20
1
2
5
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
5
Re
s
d
e
n
l
i
c
i
Fc
:
r
s
o
v
f
l
s
S
f
,
0
5
:
Cu
r
r
c
n
t
in
e
e
s
t
:
,
,
c
n
t
s
:
S.?
%
Fo
r
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
:
-
Sa
v
n
a
q
s
fr
o
n
t
P;e
w
m
u
s
Hc
a
l
t
h
c
a
r
e
He
a
l
t
h
c
a
r
c
Fu
n
d
e
r
Sh
a
r
e
8.
6
7
%
iv
s
h
r
e
t
S
.
6.
’
8,
7
6
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
0.
0
0
-
0
0.0
0
0.
0
2
Fe
r
5
q
v
t
n
c
s
s
f
r
o
r
t
Cs
r
r
,
’
n
t
i’
w
e
s
s
,
,
c
,
O
S
°%
Fo
r
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
:
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
-
Sa
t
m
q
s
fr
o
n
t
P:
w
m
,
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
t
y
Fu
n
d
e
r
S
h
a
r
e
6.4
2
%
hv
o
m
n
r
n
t
c
6
.
.
3
’
23
.
5
3,
8
8
8
,
8
6
0
24
9
,
6
6
5
23
2
,
1
1
4
.
6
67
,
2
4
1
19
4
0
4
13
.
1
2
4
0.
0
4
0.
6
2
Fo
r
5
a
v
:
n
,
s
fr
o
m
Cu
,
r
!
n
t
in
v
e
s
c
,
,
e
n
o
:
5.
7
%
Fo
r
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
:
Te
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
En
e
r
g
y
5u
v
i
n
q
fr
o
n
t
P,
,
o
n
s
Te
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
St
a
r
l
.
1
*
2
0
%
Fu
n
d
e
r
S
h
a
r
e
8.6
7
%
Th
v
e
s
l
m
r
n
t
s
.
5.J
’
27
.
0
37
3
,
5
8
5
32
,
3
8
8
-
2,
8
7
0
-
29
,
5
1
8
0.
0
9
0.
1
0
ti
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
En
e
r
g
y
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Al
l
i
a
n
c
e
42
1
SW
Si
x
t
h
Av
e
n
u
e
,
Su
i
t
e
60
0
,
Po
r
t
l
a
n
d
,
OR
97
2
0
4
50
3
.
6
8
8
.
5
4
0
0
Fa
x
50
3
.
6
8
8
.
5
4
4
7
ne
e
a
.
o
r
g
I
in
f
o
@
n
e
e
a
.
o
r
g
St
a
f
f
_
P
R
_
0
5
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
B
No
t
e
:
th
e
s
e
nu
m
b
e
r
s
ar
e
fo
r
il
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
pu
r
p
o
s
e
on
l
y
.
Pa
g
e
4
of
4
AVISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/2013
CASE NO:AVU-E-1 3-09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Lori Hermanson
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:DSM Policy,Planning &Analysis
REQUEST NO.:Staff-07 TELEPHONE:[phone]
REQUEST:
Please provide the Requests for Proposals (“RFPs”)for all evaluation services between 2010 and
2012 and all responses to those RFPs.Also,please provide the number,location,and duration of
all RFP advertisements.
RESPONSE:
During this time period,the Company issued the following four RFPs:
•R-36$60 Net-to-Gross Evaluation of Avista’s DSM Programs —sent to 11 potential bidders.
Only one bid was submitted.See Staff_PR_07 Attachment A.
•R-37051 Evaluation,Measurement &Verification —Demand-Side Management Programs —
sent to 12 potential bidders.Five proposals were received.See Staff_PR_07 Attachment B.
•R-36797 Conservation Potential Assessment Long-term Demand-Side and Other Resources —
sent to 5 potential bidders.Three bidders submitted proposals.See Staff_PR_07 Attachment C
The duration of these RFP advertisements were not tracked however,they were “open”for
approximately one month.
Due to the voluminous nature of the reports they are being provided in electronic format only.
AWSTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/20 13
CASE NO:AVU-E-13 -09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Lori Hermanson
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:D$M Policy,Planning &Analysis
REQUEST NO.:Staff-09 TELEPHONE:(509)495-
REQUEST:
Page 10 of Ms.Hermanson’s testimony says Cadmus was retained for another two years in part to
conduct “some market analysis for the 2012 and 2013 electric and gas DSM portfolio.”Please
explain market analysis,how it is differs from a Conservation Potential Assessment,and why it is
necessary for gas DSM in Idaho which was suspended in 2012.
RESPONSE:
Market analysis is a subset of evaluation,measurement and verification that evaluates the changes
of a market or the behavior of participants in a market.A Conservation Potential Assessment
(CPA)is a type of market analysis/evaluation because it approximates the potential in a utility’s
service territory based on that utility’s specific assumptions such as growth rates,avoided costs,
discount rates,etc.A CPA as part of its market assessment also includes levels ofsaturation of the
energy efficiency measures/equipment in the various customer segments.
Market analysis also includes net-to-gross studies.Avista’s 2012-2013 evaluation,measurement
&verification scope includes some very limited net-to-gross analyses to con±irm whether the
recent and significant change in the residential market is an anomaly or a trend.
While Ms.Hermanson’s testimony says “some market analysis for the 2012 and 2013 electric and
natural gas D$M portfolios”,the majority of these market studies have been incurred by the
electric portfolio.Even though natural gas DSM has been suspended,market studies are important
and can benefit future program delivery of current and future DSM programs.
AVISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/20 13
CASE NO:AVU-E-13-09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Lori Hermanson
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:D$M Policy,Planning &Analysis
REQUEST NO.:Staff-il TELEPHONE:[phone]
REQUEST:
Page 9 of the Avista 2012 Idaho Electric Impact evaluation recommends that Avista “consider
analyzing easy to quantify NEBs,which could be added to the programs for cost-effectiveness
reporting.”Please explain which NEBs are being referenced and how they might be analyzed.
RESPONSE:
As part of Avista’s EM&V Framework and our EM&V Requests for Proposals,the Company has
asked evaluators to identify where potential gaps exists in our processes and procedures and make
recommendations to improve on these potential gaps.Cadmus has been involved in many
Advisory Group discussions where the difficulty of low income cost-effective has been discussed.
Consequently,Cadmus has continued to recommend a non-energy benefit (NEB)analysis that has
been performed for other utilities.Some of these non-energy benefits,ranging from benefits to
participants,the utility and society,include economic impacts,environmental impacts,water
reductions,improved payment patterns/arrearage reductions,increased home value,improved
affordability and reduced forced mobility.
Avista has adhered to the practice of incorporating non-energy impacts into cost-effectiveness
calculations where those benefits can be quantified with reasonable rigor and are defensible.
Avista strives to track the metrics associated with those impacts for subjective consideration in the
management of the portfolio.
Avista does generally incorporate the value of reduced water use.Carbon costs are included
through the planning evaluation process used to develop avoided costs therefore including carbons
costs as a non-energy benefit is not necessary.The societal value of reductions in other
environmental externalities is difficult to isolate and therefore rarely quantified for purposes of
cost-effectiveness analysis,though these values may to some degree be contained within the 10%
resource preference given to energy efficiency programs.The valuation of several of the impacts
of low income programs is difficult to attribute to energy efficiency programs since the customer is
often accessing multiple programs during the same period of time.Other suggested impacts would
necessitate the consideration not only ofthe favorable impact of the funding upon the participating
customer but also the burden of the funding and the administrative cost related to the program on
non-participating customers.The Company believes the other values are inappropriate due to
double-counting of the benefits (e.g.including both increased home value and the value of future
energy savings)or because the impact is a transfer within the ratepayer class that is inappropriate
for inclusion within the Total Resource Cost test (e.g.reduced arrearages).
AWSTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/2013
CASE NO:AVU-E-13-09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Loñ Hermanson
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:DSM Policy,Planning &Analysis
REQUEST NO.:Staff-12 TELEPHONE:[phone]
REQUEST:
Pages 13 and 20 of the Avista 2012 Idaho Electric Impact evaluation read “Error!Reference
Source Not Found.”Please provide the correct reference source for each of those omissions.
RESPONSE:
On Page 13 the “Error!Reference Source Not Found”should read “Equation 1.”On Page 20 the
“Error!Reference Source Not Found”should be “Evaluated Gross Savings.”
AWSTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/20 13
CASE NO:AVU-E-13 -09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Lori Hermanson
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:DSM Policy,Planning &Analysis
REQUEST NO.:Staff-13 TELEPHONE:[phone]
REQUEST:
Page 19 of the Avista 2012 Idaho Electric Impact evaluation includes a paragraph that ends with an
incomplete sentence:The diversity ofthe.”Please provide the complete sentence and any missing
supplemental sentences.
RESPONSE:
The complete sentence that was omitted in error in the Avista 2012 Idaho Electric Impact
evaluation report is “The diversity of the Avista participant dataset provided an effective
secondary data source for estimating energy savings when Avista-specific metering could not be
conducted.”
AVISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/30/2013
CASE NO:AVU-E-13-09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Lori Hermanson
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:D$M Policy,Planning &Analysis
REQUEST NO.:Staff-i 5 TELEPHONE:(509)495-
REQUEST:
Please explain why Avista used 2009 Cadmus evaluation data for clothes washer energy savings
estimates rather than then-current Regional Technical forum (“RTF”)data.
RESPONSE:
Per Cadmus,“Our report explains that we used the largest metering study done to date (the
Cadmus study in CA with 100 meters)and that our primary survey data agreed with the RBSA of
262 cycles per year.We determined our research is the most current and applicable to Avista’s
territory.furthermore,the measures in the report are first evaluated as gross savings and then a
NTG factor is applied to derive the final value.The use of an RTF value (with the adjusted market
baseline)for clothes washers would be inconsistent with the rest ofthe report when compared with
gross values.The final net value for clothes washers in the evaluation report results in a value
similar to the RTF.”
Avista agreed with Cadmus’application in this circumstance and believes that this is consistent
with our EM&V framework and the Annual EM&V Plans as presented to the Advisory Group.
Cadmus is an independent entity retained to provide best practices application of EM&V and
Avista does not engage in Cadmus’application of protocols unless technical or customer data
requires dialogue.
AVISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:IDAHO DATE PREPARED:12/17/2013
CASE NO:AVU-E-13 -09/AVU-G-13-02 WITNESS:
REQUESTER:IPUC Staff RESPONDER:Chris Drake
TYPE:Production Request DEPARTMENT:DSM
REQUEST NO.:Staff-16 TELEPHONE:[phone]
REQUEST:
Please list the proj ects,incentive payments,and locations for all Office of Energy Resources
(“OER”)projects that Avista incented in 2010,2011,and 2012.
RESPONSE:
Please see Staff_PR_i 6 Attachment A.
In
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
in
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
-
Pa
y
m
e
n
t
-
Pa
y
m
e
n
t
-
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
-
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Fu
e
l
t
y
p
e
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
Na
t
u
r
a
l
Ga
s
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
Na
m
e
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
Si
t
e
Ad
d
r
e
s
s
Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Na
m
e
Co
t
t
o
n
w
o
o
d
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
24
2
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
Ele
c
t
r
i
c
$1
,
0
9
5
Co
t
t
o
n
w
o
o
d
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
I
c
t
24
2
Co
t
t
o
n
w
o
o
d
Pr
a
r
i
e
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
Ke
u
t
e
r
v
i
l
l
e
Rd
,
Co
t
t
o
n
w
o
o
d
ID
83
5
2
2
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
s
r
c
e
s
Cu
l
d
e
s
a
c
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
Ele
c
t
r
i
c
$7
5
Cu
l
d
e
s
a
c
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Cu
l
d
e
s
a
c
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Ma
I
n
,
60
0
Cu
l
d
e
s
a
c
,
Cu
l
d
e
s
a
c
,
ID
83
5
2
4
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
cc
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
s
r
c
e
s
Ke
n
d
r
i
c
k
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
Ele
c
t
r
i
c
$9
3
Ke
n
d
r
i
c
k
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Ke
n
d
r
i
c
k
Sc
h
o
o
l
01
s
t
#2
8
3
Ag
Sh
o
p
,
20
0
1
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
#3
,
Ke
n
d
r
i
c
k
ID
83
5
3
7
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Ke
n
d
r
i
c
k
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
-S
S
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
Ele
c
t
r
i
c
$1
,
6
8
7
Ke
n
d
r
i
c
k
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Ke
n
d
r
i
c
k
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
#2
8
3
Ag
Sh
o
p
,
20
0
1
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
#3
,
Ke
n
d
r
i
c
k
ID
83
9
3
7
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
La
k
e
Pe
n
d
Or
e
l
l
l
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
84
-
PS
C
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
HV
A
C
Ga
s
$6
7
5
La
k
e
Pe
n
d
Or
e
i
l
l
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
84
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
De
p
t
,
17
0
0
BI
d
y
Mtn
Rd
,
Sa
n
d
p
o
i
n
t
,
ID
83
8
6
4
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
La
k
e
Pe
n
d
Or
e
i
l
l
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
84
-
PS
C
Co
m
m
e
r
c
I
a
l
HV
A
C
Ga
s
$6
7
5
La
k
e
Pe
n
d
Or
e
i
l
l
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
84
Ma
l
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
De
p
t
.
17
0
0
RI
d
y
Mt
n
Rd
,
Sa
n
d
p
o
i
n
t
,
ID
#3
8
6
4
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Mo
s
c
o
w
Ch
a
r
t
e
r
Sc
h
o
o
l
-
Pr
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
Lig
h
t
I
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
Ele
c
t
r
i
c
$1
,
4
9
0
Mo
s
c
o
w
Ch
a
r
t
e
r
Sc
h
o
o
l
Mo
s
c
o
w
Ch
a
r
t
e
r
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
E
17
2
3
F
St.
Mo
s
c
o
w
,
10
83
8
4
3
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
PS
C
Lig
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
Ele
c
t
r
i
c
$1
8
,
7
4
6
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Oi
s
t
r
i
c
t
Mc
D
o
n
a
l
d
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
,
23
2
3
E.
0
St
r
e
e
t
,
Mo
s
c
o
w
,
ID
#3
8
4
3
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
-
PS
C
Lig
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$9
,
2
6
8
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Le
n
a
Wh
i
t
m
o
r
e
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
11
0
5
.
ala
i
n
St
r
e
e
t
,
Mo
s
c
o
w
,
ID
83
9
4
3
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
-
PS
C
Lig
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$1
4
,
6
1
7
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Mo
s
c
o
w
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
40
2
E.
5t
h
St
r
e
e
t
,
Mo
s
c
o
w
,
ID
83
8
4
3
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
-
PS
C
Lig
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$2
1
,
7
9
6
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Mo
s
c
o
w
Jr
.
Hig
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
14
1
0
E.
0
Str
e
e
t
,
Mo
s
c
o
w
,
ID
83
8
4
3
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$6
,
7
8
9
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
We
s
t
Pa
r
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
91
0
Ho
m
e
Str
e
e
t
,
Mo
s
c
o
w
,
10
83
8
4
3
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$1
2
,
9
0
9
Mo
s
c
o
w
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Ru
s
s
e
l
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
11
9
N.
Ad
a
m
s
,
Mo
s
c
o
w
,
ID
83
8
4
3
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Ne
r
p
e
r
c
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
30
2
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$2
,
3
3
7
Ne
i
p
e
r
c
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
30
2
Ne
z
p
e
r
c
e
Po
o
l
an
d
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
,
61
5
2n
d
Ay
e
,
Ne
z
p
e
r
c
e
,
ID
83
5
4
3
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Ne
z
p
e
r
c
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
30
2
-S
S
Lig
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$2
,
8
0
7
Ne
r
p
e
r
c
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
30
2
Ne
a
p
e
r
c
e
Po
o
l
an
d
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
,
61
9
2n
d
Ay
e
,
Ne
z
p
e
r
c
e
,
10
83
9
4
3
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Or
o
f
i
n
o
Jo
i
n
t
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
17
1
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$2
,
9
6
1
Or
o
f
i
n
o
Jo
i
n
t
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
17
1
Or
o
f
i
n
o
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
10
0
0
MI
c
h
i
g
a
n
Av
e
n
u
e
,
Om
f
i
n
o
,
ID
83
5
4
4
Id
a
h
o
Off
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
St.
Ma
r
i
e
s
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
41
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$1
,
9
1
4
St
.
Ma
r
i
e
s
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
41
St
Ma
r
i
e
s
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
Rt
2.
St
Ma
n
e
s
,
ID
83
8
6
1
Id
a
h
o
Off
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
We
s
t
Bo
n
n
e
r
Co
u
n
t
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
#8
3
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
$1
4
0
We
s
t
Bo
n
n
e
r
Co
u
n
t
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
I
c
t
#8
3
Pr
i
e
s
t
Riv
e
r
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
11
0
7
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
97
,
Pr
i
e
s
t
Ri
v
e
r
,
10
83
8
9
6
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
We
s
t
Bo
n
n
e
r
Co
u
n
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
#8
3
-
PS
C
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
Ele
c
t
r
i
c
$2
9
We
s
t
Bo
n
n
e
r
Co
u
n
t
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
#8
3
Pr
i
e
s
t
Riv
e
r
Jr
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
57
0
9
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
2,
Pr
i
e
s
t
Riv
e
r
,
ID
83
8
9
6
Id
a
h
o
Of
f
i
c
e
of
En
e
r
g
y
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
su
b
-
t
o
t
a
l
s
$9
4
,
7
4
9
$1
,
3
5
0
19
$6
6
,
O
9
9
I
T
o
t
a
l
in
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
pa
i
d
St
a
f
f
_
P
R
_
1
6
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
A.s
l
s
a
Pa
g
e
1
of
1