Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20221129Staff 23-33 to PAC.pdfMICHAEL DUVAL DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 (208) 334-0320 IDAHO BAR NO. II7I4 iiECiIVED :t?i i{i}Y 29 PH 3: 57 It\ r i : j\ r 'a:.-:. : ,,; \' ,.-U iist0Ni; Li fi l- ( , t..) l,-l t"1 Street Address for Express Mail: 1I33I W CHINDEN BLVD, BLDG 8, SUITE 2OI-A BOISE,ID 83714 Attorney for the Commission Staff BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ROCKY MOTJNTAIN POWER FOR AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT A COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEMAND RE,SPONSE PROGRAM CASE NO. PAC.E-22-I3 SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its attomey of record, Michael Duval, Deputy Attorney General, requests that Rocky Mountain Power ("Company") provide the following documents and information as soon as possible, but no later than TUESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2022. This Production Request is to be considered as continuing, and the Company is requested to provide, by way of supplementary responses, additional documents that it, or any person acting on its behalf, may later obtain that will augment the documents or information produced. Please provide answers to each question, supporting workpapers that provide detail or are the source of information used in calculations, and the name, job title, and telephone number of the person preparing the documents. Please also identifu the name, job title, location, and telephone number of the record holder. SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 NOVEMBER29,2022 In addition to the written copies provided as response to the requests, please provide all Excel spreadsheets and electronic files on CD with formulas intact and enabled. REQUEST NO.23: Please provide estimates for the range in cost, inventory requirements, O&M costs, product life, reliability, and any other assumptions for the remote- controlled relays used for automated curtailment. Please provide any additional supporting documentation or worksheets to support these estimates. REQUEST NO. 24: Please describe the Company's process for recovering physical devices if a participant drops out of the program. Please provide analysis of how the additional costs associated with the retrieval of the device, if any, will affect the program's cost effectiveness. REQUEST NO.25: Please describe the incentive structures the Company considered for the proposed program (i.e., individual rates for grid management functions such as peak load reduction, contingency reserves, and frequency response, fixed annual incentive, etc.) and the reasoning used to select the proposed fixed incentive structure. REQUEST NO. 26: In Response to Production Request No. 8, the Company indicates that the value of energy fluctuates in response to several market conditions. Please provide an explanation of how the Company tracks the fluctuation of these values and provide the workpapers detailing the valuation of the different grid management functions with all formulas intact and enabled. REQUEST NO. 27: Please explain how the Company intends to report on the proposed program. RJQUEST NO. 28: Please explain how the Company will evaluate and report the performance and cost-efflectiveness of the program. Please include all metrics, such as cost, savings, and any other metrics the Company plans to use in its evaluation. SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST TO ROCKY MOI-INTAIN POWER 2 NOVEMBER29,2022 REQUEST NO. 29: Please explain the Company's intentions for evaluating the program? (i.e., process and impact evaluations) REQUEST NO. 30: In the confidential worksheet provided in Response to Production Request No. 16, Utah export credit values for energy and capacity ("energy+cap") and incremental reserves are provided and used to calculate the benefits for the proposed program. Please answer the following questions related to the Utah export credit values. a. Please describe the reasoning for using Utah values for an Idaho program. b. Please identifu the risk associated with using Utah values for Idaho and how the Company accounted for them. c. Please provide workpapers for the energyfcap and incremental reserve export credit values in electronic format with formulas intact. Please include a detailed description and examples of how these values are calculated. d. The Company uses the sum of 2022 energy*cap and incremental reserve export credit values to calculate the benefitsin2023. Please explain why 2022 export credits are used to calculate 2023 benefits. REQUEST NO.31: Does the Company intend to use the Commercial and Industrial Demand Response program as part of a "flexible load" program? If so, please explain the Company's approach to the "flexible" load program. If not, please explain why the Company has not considered this approach as part of its Demand Response program. REQUEST NO. 32: Does the Company intend to use the Commercial and Industrial Demand Response program to allow for intraday shifting of electricity use during hours with high electricity prices or peak load (i.e. load shifting)? If so, please explain the Company's approach to "load shifting" within the program. If not, please explain why the Company has not considered this approach as part of its Demand Response program. REQUEST NO.33: In reference to Table 6 on page 6 of the Application, please explain why the values for Maximum Dispatch Hours, Maximum Events per year, and the Dispatch SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER J NOVEMBER2g,2022 Duration for the Real-Time Program and the Advance Notice Program differ from or are not shown in proposed changes to the load management flexible tariff identified in Exhibit B of the Application. +\ DATED at Boise, Idaho, tfrit ] 7 day of December 2A22. Michael Duval Deputy Attorney General i:umisc:prodreq/pace22. I 3mdr\ijt prod req 2 SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 4 NOVEMBER29,2022 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022, SERVED THE FOREGOING SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO ROCKY MOTINTAIN POWER, IN CASE NO. PAC-E-22-13, BY E-MAILING A COPY THEREOF, TO THE FOLLOWING: TED WESTON MICHAEL S SNOW ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER I4O7 WEST NORTH TEMPLE STE 330 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84I 16 E-MAIL : ted.weston@paci fi corp.com micheal.snow@pacifi corp.com DATA REQUEST RESPONSE CENTER E-MAIL ONLY: datarequest@paci fi corp.com BRUBAKER & ASSOCIATES BRIAN C. COLLINS GREG MEYER 16690 SWINGLEY RIDGE RD., #I4O CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017 E-MAIL bcollins@consullbaieom smever@consultbai.com LANCE KAUFMAN, PH.D. 2623 NW BLUEBELL PLACE CORVALLIS, OR 97330 E-MAIL: lance@aesisinsight.com JOE DALLAS ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 825 NE MULTNOMAH ST, SUITE 2OOO PORTLAND OR 97232 E-MAIL : j oseph.dallas@pacificorp.com THOMAS J. BUDGE RACINE, OLSON PLLP 2OI E. CENTER PO BOX 1391 POCATELLO, ID 83204.1391 E-MAIL : d @racineolson.com ERIC L. OLSEN ECHO HAWK & OLSEN PLLC 505 PERSHING AVE., SUITE 1OO PO BOX 6119 POCATELLO,ID 83205 E-MAIL : elo@echohawk.com L,4A* SECRETAflt' / CERTIFICATE OF SERVTCE