Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210810PAC to Bayer 57-62.pdfROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 1407 W North Temple, Suite 330 Salt Lake City, Utah 841 '16 ; li, '. August 10,2021 Randall C. Budge/Bayer randy (@.racineolson. com (C) Thomas J. Budge/Bayer ti @racineolson. com (WXC) Brian C. Collins/Bayer bcollins@consultbai.com (W)(C) Maurice B rubaker/B ayer mbrubaker@ c onsultba i. c om (C ) Kevin Higgins/B ayer khiseins@energystrat. com (C) L ance Kaufman/B ayer lance @,ae e isinsi ght. co m (C) James R. SmithlBayer i im. r. smith@ic loud. com (C) Mike Veile lBay er m ike. vei le@ba),er.com Courfirey Higgins/Bayer chiggins@enerqystrat.com Milli Picharo/Bayer m pichardo @enersy strat. c om Neal Townsend/Bayer ntownsend @energystrat.com RE:ID PAC.E-21-07 Bayer Set 4ft (57-62) Please find enclosed Rocky Mountain Power's Responses to Bayer 4ft Set Data Request 57-62. Also provided are Attachments Bayer 57 and 58. Provided via encryption are Confidential Attachments Bayer 6l and 62. Confidential information is provided subject to protection under IDAPA 31.01.01.067 and 31.01.01.233, the Idaho Public Utilities Commission's Rules of Procedure No. 67 - Information Exempt from Public Review, and further subject to the Non- Disclosure Agreement (NDA) executed in this proceeding. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (801)220-2963. Sincerely, -1sl-J. Ted Weston Manager, Regulation Enclosures C.c.: Jan Noriyuki/IPUC ian.norivuki@puc.idaho.eov (C) Ronald L. Williams/PIIC ron@williamsbradburv.com Bradley G. Mullins/PIIC brmull ins@,mwanalytics. com Adam Gardner/PIIC AGardner@idahoan.com (W) Kyle Williams/PIIC williamsk@bvui. edu (W) Val Steiner/PIIC val. steiner@ itafos.com (W) Eric L. Olsen/IIPA elo@echohawk.com (C) Anthony Yankel/IPA tonv@yankel.net (C) Ben Otto/ICL bofio@idahoconservation.ors (C) Ronald L. Willianos/PllC ron@williamsbradburv.com Btadley G. MullinslPIIC brrrullins@mwanalvtics.com Adam Crardner/PIIC AGardner@idahoan.com (W) Kyle WtlliamslPllC williamsk@bv,ui.edu (W) Val StEinerlP. [C val. steiner@itafos. com (W) Eric t. OlsEu/IIPA elo@echohawk.com (C) Anthony Yankel/IIPA tony@yankel.net (C) Brad furdy bmpurdy@hotmail.com (C) PAC-E-21-07 / Rocky Mountain Power August 10,2021 Bayer Data Request 57 Bayer Data Request 57 Customer Service Deposits. Please refer to Mr. McDougal's Exhibit No. 40 (Results of Operations), page 2.28. (a) Please explain why the entries corresponding to Customer Service Deposits (lines 2145-2148) are zero. (b) Please compare these entries to the comparable entries in Exhibit RMP_(SRM-3), page 2.29,hnes 2164-2167, in Utah Docket No. 20-034-04 In the Utah docket, $16.3 million of Customer Service Deposits are adjusted into the 2021testperiod as a credit against rate base. Please explain in detail why there is no analogous adjustment for Idaho and provide any documentation and work papers supporting such explanation. (c) Please provide the actual (if available) or projected monthly balance of Idaho Customer Service Deposits for each month from December 2019 to December 2021. Please indicate whether each amount provided represents an actual or projected balance. (d) Please provide the actual (if available) or projected monthly Idaho interest expense on Customer Service Deposits for each month from January 2020to December 202L. Please indicate whether each amount provided represents an actual or projected amount. Response to Bayer Data Request 57 (a) In accordance with the Idaho Public Utilities Commission approved methodology the Company does not include customer service deposits as a rate base deduction because customer service deposits are short-term in nature, paid interest at the commission approved customer deposit rate, and held for guarantee of payment on services rendered. (b) The Company assumes that the reference to "Utah Docket No. 20-034-04" is intended to be a reference to PacifiCorp's Utah general rate case (GRC) proceeding, Docket 20-035-04. Based on the foregoing correction and assumption, the Company responds as follows: The Company treats customer service deposits in Utah consistent with the Utah commission approved methodology as approved in Utah Docket No. 97- 035-01. (c) Please refer to Attachment Bayer 57. No projected amounts were available (d) Please refer to Attachment Bayer 57. No projected amounts were available. PAC-E-21-07 / Rocky Mountain Power August 10,2021 Bayer Data Request 57 Recordholder:Mike Martin Sponsor:Steven McDougal PAC-E-21-07 / Rocky Mountain Power August 10,2021 Bayer Data Request 58 Bayer Data Request 58 Employee count. Please provide the actual full time equivalent (FTE) employee count by month, beginning in January 2017 md continuing through the most recent date available. In this response, please indicate the day of the month to which the FTE counts correspond (e.g., lst of the month,last day of the month, etc.). Please supplement this response as new information becomes available during the pendency of this case. Response to Bayer Data Request 58 Please refer to Attachment Bayer 58 for the actual monthly full-time equivalent (FTE) count as of the last day ofthe month from January 2017 through the most recent month of July 2021. Recordholder:Brittrrey Davis-Smiley Steve McDougalSponsor PAC-E-21-07 / Rocky Mountain Power August 10,2021 Bayer Data Request 59 Bayer Data Request 59 Employee count. Please confirm that the Company's test period labor expenses are efFectively based on the average full time equivalent employee count for the base period ended December 31,2020.If not please indicate the time period corresponding to the employee count upon which test period labor expenses are based. Response to Bayer Data Request 59 The Wage and Employee Benefit Adjustnent (WEBA) included in this general rate case (GRC) does not use employee count in the calculation. Recordholder:Laura Miller Sponsor:Steven McDougal PAC-E-21-07 / Rocky Mountain Power August 10,2021 Bayer Data Request 60 Bayer Data Request 60 Employee count Please indicate whether the Company has made any adjusfrnents to the base period to reflect known and measurable changes that include changes to the number of employees. If so, please explain and cite to the adjustnent(s) in the Company's filing. Response to Bayer Data Request 60 The Wage and Employee Benefit Adjustnent (WEBA) included in this general rate case (GRC) does not use employee count in the calculation. Recordholder:Laura Miller Sponsor:Steven McDougal PAC-E-21-07 / Rocky Mountain Power August 10,2021 Bayer Data Request 6l Bayer Data Request 61 Annual Incentive Plan. Please provide a copy of the Annual Incentive Plan documents for each year 2018 through 2020, and if available,202l. Response to Bayer Data Request 61 Please refer to Confidential Attachment Bayer 61 which provides copies of PacifiCorp's Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) documents for calendar years 2018 through 2021. Confidential information is provided subject to protection under IDAPA 31.01.01 .067 and 31.01.01.233, the Idaho Public Utilities Commission's Rules of Procedure No. 67 - Information Exempt from Public Review, and further subject to the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) executed in this proceeding. Recordholder:Leslie Chase Sponsor:Steve McDougal PAC-E-21-07 / Rocky Mountain Power August 10,2021 Bayer Data Request 62 Bayer Data Request 62 Annual Incentive Plan. Please provide the PacifiCorp Scorecards applicable to the Annual lncentive Plan for each year 2018 through2020, and if available, 2021. Response to Bayer Data Request 62 Please refer to Confidential AttachmentBayer 62 Confidential information is provided subject to protection under IDAPA 31.01.01.067 and 31.01.01.233, the Idaho Public Utilities Commission's Rules of Procedure No. 67 - Information Exempt from Public Review, and further subject to the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) executed in this proceeding. Recordholder:Dana Connors Sponsor:Steve McDougal