20180730PAC to Staff 7 and 12 Supplemental.pdf

Y ROCKY MOUNTAIN
mly,Es"-,
J. Ted Weston
Manager, Regulation
Enclosures
RECE IVED
?$l$ JUt- 30 PH 5: 05
I L, l l .J f i-t,i Liir
l'; i' ', ,'r:t 1l(,,i,ii,qlSSlOi'i
1407 W North Temple, Suite 330
salt Lake city, utah &41't6
July 30,2018
Diane Hanian
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472W. Washington
Boise,ID 83702-5918
[e-mail]. eov (C)
RE: ID PAC-E-I8-04
IPUC Data Requests
Please find enclosed Rocky Mountain Power's lst Supplemental Responses to IPUC Data
Requests 7 and 12.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
L) , T"^L'.J-.-{':'. l0N
PAC-E-I8-04 lRocky Mountain Power
July 30,2018
IPUC l't Set Data Request 7 - lst Supplemental
IPUC Data Request 7
Please explain how customers are being notified of the proposed change.
lst Supplemental Response to IPUC Data Request 7
Further to the Company's response to IPUC Data Request 7 dated June 15, 2018,
the Company provides the following supplemental response:
The Company does not approach its customers and request/ask if they want to
transfer service to another supplier. If a customer wishes to be served by Idaho
Falls Power they must approach the city first and request service. If the city
agrees to serve that customer, the city will bring a letter(s) to RMP, signed by
affected customers, and make a formal request to transfer service. The customers
are making the request, not RMP. The customer is first "notified" by virtue of the
customer's desire and formal request to change providers.
Recordholder: Brent Dewsnup
Sponsor: To Be Determined
PAC-E-18-04 i Rocky Mountain Power
July 30, 2018
IPUC lst Set Data Request 12 - 1$ Supplemental
IPUC Data Request 12
In the Company's response to Production Request No. 7, the Company explained
that all the affected property was purchased by a commercial developer who
requested to be served by Idatro Falls. Therefore, notification had taken place.
Please explain the response, because it appears that the affected property consists
of individual residential properties.
lst Supplemental Response to IPUC Data Request 12
Further to the Company's response to IPUC Data Request l2 dated July 12,2018,
the Company provides the following supplemental response:
The commercial developer incorrectly refened to in IPUC Data Response 7 was
associated with the Pioneer Road service territory agreement filed in PAC-E-I8-
03 not this application. PAC-E-18-04 requests authorization to tansfer service for
Nina, Charla, and Merlin Drive which are part of Prestwich Estates, an existing
subdivision that was annexed by the city of Idaho Falls. Please refer to the l$
supplemental response to IPUC Data Request 7 for further explanation to how
those customers received notification of the transfer of service.
Recordholder: Brent Dewsnup
Sponsor: To Be Determined