Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180118PAC to Staff UT_UAE Set 3 (1-2).pdf1407 W.NorthTemple ROCKY MOUNTAIN Salt Lake City,UT 84116 POWER A DMSION OF PACIFICORP January I1,2018 Gary A.Dodge Phillip Russell HATCH,JAMES &DODGE 10 West Broadway,Suite 400 Salt Lake City,Utah 84101 gdodge@hjdlaw.com (C) o_m (C ) Kevin Higgins Neal Townsend ENERGY STRATEGIES 215 S.State Street,#200 Salt Lake City,UT 84111 khiggins@energystrat.com (C) utownsend@energvstrat.com(C)(W) RE:UT Docket No.17-035-40 UAE 3rd Set Data Request (1-2) Please find enclosed Rocky Mountain Power's Responses to UAE 3rd Set Data Requests 3.1-3.2. Also provided is Attachment UAE 3.2-1.Provided on the enclosed Confidential CD is Confidential Attachment UAE 3.2 -2.Confidential information is provided subject to Public Service Commission of Utah (UPSC)Rules 746-1-602 and 603. If you have any questions,please call me at (801)220-2823. Sincerely, Jana Saba Manager,Regulation Enclosures C.c.Erika Tedder/DPU dpudatarequestCalutah.gov etedder@utah.gov(C) Dan Kohler/DPU dkoehler@daymarkea.com(C) Dan Peac/DPU dpeaco@j_aymarkea.com (C)(W) Aliea Afnan/DPU aafnan@daymarkea.com(W) Philip Hayet/OCS phayet@j_kennn.com(C) Béla Vastag/OCS bvastag@utah.gov(C) Sophie Hays/UCE sophie@utaheleanenergy.org(C) Kate Bowman/UCE kate@utaheleanenerav.org(C)(W) Emma Rieves/UCE emma@utahcleanenergy.org(C)(W) Lisa Tormoen Hickey/Interwestlisahickey@newlawaroup.com (C) Mitch Longson/Interwest mloneson@mc2b.com (C) Nancy Kelly/WRAnkelly@westernresources.org(C) Jennifer Gardner/WRA jennifer.gardner@westernresources.org(C) Penny Anderson/WRA penny.anderson@westernresources.org (W) Peter J.Mattheis/Nucor pim@smxblaw.com (C) Eric J.Lacey/Nucor ejl@smxblaw.com (C)(W) William J.Evans/UIEC bevans@parsonsbehle.com Vicki M.Baldwin/UIEC vbaldwin@parsonsbehle.com(W) Chad C.Baker/UIEC ebaker@parsonsbehle.com (W) 17-035-40 /Rocky Mountain Power January 11,2018 UAE Data Request 3.1 UAE Data Request 3.1 Regarding H.R.1,entitled "An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution of the Budget for Fiscal Year 2017,"which became Public Law No.115-97 and was signed into law on December 22,2017 (Tax Reform Bill): (a)For each Price-Policy Scenario,please update the analysis summarized in Table 2 (Page 6)to the August 31,2017 Supplemental Testimony of Rick T.Link in Docket No 17-035-23,taking into consideration the impacts of the passage of the referenced Tax Reform Bill. (b)Please provide all work papers PacifiCorp used to develop the updated analysis in response to the request in subparagraph (a),above. (c)For the updated analysis requested in subparagraph (a),above,please provide a list of each and every assumption and input that changed relative to PacifiCorp's August 31, 2017 analysis. (d)Please provide a narrative explanation of how PacifiCorp expects the provisions in the referenced Tax Reform Bill regarding the reduction of the marginal corporate tax rate from 35%to 21%will impact the economic case for making the investment in the Wind Projects and Transmission Projects,as contemplated in this matter (See Title 1, Subtitle C,Part I). (e)Please provide a narrative explanation of how PacifiCorp expects the provisions in the referenced Tax Reform Bill allowingfor temporary 100-percent expensing for certain business assets impact the economic case for making the investment in the Wind Projects and Transmission Projects,as contemplated in this matter (See Title 1, Subtitle C,Part III,Subpart A). (f)Please provide a narrative explanation of how PacifiCorp expects the provisions in the referenced Tax Reform Bill surrounding the Base Erosion Minimum Tax impact the economic case for making the investment in the Wind Projects and Transmission Projects,as contemplated in this matter (See §14401). (g)Does PacifiCorp agree that the passage of the referenced Tax Reform Bill has the potential to result in a Net Operating Loss Carryforward on PacifiCorp's balance sheet?If no,please explain why PacifiCorp expects that there is no potential for such an outcome. (h)Does PacifiCorp agree that the passage of the referenced Tax Reform Bill has the potential to result in Production Tax Credit Carryforwards on PacifiCorp's balance sheet?If no,please explain why PacifiCorp expects that there is no potential for such an outcome. 17-035-40 /Rocky Mountain Power January 11,2018 UAE Data Request 3.1 (i)Please describe the incremental revenue requirement impact,if any,associated with Net Operating Loss Carryforwards and Production Tax Credit Carryforwards that PacifiCorp forecasts if the investments in the Wind Projects and Transmission Projects are made,after considering the impacts of the referenced Tax Reform Bill. (j)Does PacifiCorp agree that the Tax Reform Bill impacts the relative revenue requirement impact of every resource alternative considered in the 2017 Integrated Resource Plan?If no,please explain. (k)Please identify the levelized fixed cost of the 2029 Simple Cycle Combustion Turbine (SCCT)resource included in the 2017 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)preferred portfolio. (1)Please recalculate the levelized fixed cost of the 2029 SCCT taking into consideration the impacts of the referenced Tax Reform Bill. (m)Please identify the levelized fixed cost of the 2033 Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine (CCCT)resource included in the 2017 IRP preferred portfolio. (n)Please recalculate the levelized fixed cost of the 2033 CCCT in the 2017 IRP preferredportfolio taking into consideration the impacts of the referenced Tax Reform Bill. (o)Does PacifiCorp agree that,in order to continue to support its position that the Wind Projects and Transmission Project are the least cost least risk resources followingthe passage of the Tax Reform Bill,that it would be necessary to re-run the entire IRP?If no,please explain. (p)Does PacifiCorp expect the Tax Reform Bill to have an impact on natural gas prices? Please explain. Response to UAE Data Request 3.1 The Company objects to this request as overly broad,undulyburdensome,not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence,and requiring development of a special study or information not maintained in the ordinary course of business.Without waiving these objections,the Company responds as follows: (a)The Company has not performed the requested analysis.Consistent with the procedural schedule adopted for this proceeding,the Company will update its economic analysis in its supplemental filing scheduled to be filed in mid-January 2018. 17-035-40 /Rocky Mountain Power January I1,2018 UAE Data Request 3.1 (b)Please refer to the Company's response to subpart (a)above. (c)Please refer to the Company's response to subpart (a)above. (d)Please refer to the Company's response to subpart (a)above. (e)The provisions in the Tax Reform bill allowing for a temporary expensing of 100 percent for certain business assets does not apply to public utilityproperty. Accordingly,the temporary expensing of certain business assets will not apply to the Wind Projects and Transmission projects and will therefore not be included in the Company's updated economic analysis in its supplemental filing scheduled to be filed in mid-January 2018. (f)The Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT)provisions in the Tax Reform Bill that may limit the use of the production tax credit (PTC)to 80 percent of the BEAT tax for certain United States (U.S.)multi-international corporations does not apply to PacifiCorp.Accordingly,PacifiCorp will be able to use 100 percent of the PTCs and there will be no impact of the BEAT tax on the economic case for making the Wind Projects and Transmission Projects. (g)No.There are no provisions in the Tax Reform Bill that PacifiCorp anticipates would result in a material decrease to projected taxable income that would lead to an income tax net operating loss that would result in an impact on the Company balance sheet. As discussed in the Company's response to subpart (e)above,the 100-percent expensingof certain business assets does not apply to the Company's public utility property.There are no other material increases to income tax deductions that are available to the Company that are included in the Tax Reform bill that would create an income tax net operating loss.In addition,PacifiCorp is included in the federal consolidated income tax income tax return of its ultimate parent corporation, Berkshire Hathaway Inc.(BHI).The consolidated BHI income tax group has sufficient projected taxable income to fully absorb and monetize any reasonably anticipated taxable income loss that may be by generated by PacifiCorp. (h)No.As discussed in the Company's response to subpart (g)above,PacifiCorp is included in the federal consolidated income tax income tax return of its ultimate parent corporation BHI.The consolidated BHI income tax group has sufficient projected federal corporate income tax to fully absorb the PTC,which will allow PacifiCorp to monetize any PTCs generated by PacifiCorp and not use against PacifiCorp's corporate income tax.Accordingly,there will be no PTC carryforward reflected in the PacifiCorp balance sheet. (i)There will be no forecasted incremental revenue impact associated with Net Operating Loss Carryforwards and PTC Carryforwards after considering the impacts of the Tax Reform bill as discussed in the Company's responses to subparts (g)and (h)above. 17-035-40 /Rocky Mountain Power January 11,2018 UAE Data Request 3.1 (j)Yes. (k)Please refer to the confidential work papers supporting the Direct Testimony of Company witness,Rick T.Link,specifically: Folder:SO Model Summary Reports File:SO Portfolio RPCC-RPN-EGI-LM 1706042058.xlsm Tab:PVRRbyStation -row 1057 -proposed station capital costs,and row 1059 - proposed station fixed cost,column Q for resource "I UN_SC FRM,SCCT".For example,levelized fixed costs in 2029 are $21.9 million. (1)The Company has not performed the requested analysis.Consistent with the procedural schedule adopted for this proceeding,the Company will update its economic analysis in its supplemental filing scheduled to be filed in mid-January 2018. (m)Please refer to the confidential work papers supporting Mr.Link's Direct Testimony, specifically Folder:SO Model Summary Reports File:SO Portfolio RPCC-RPN-EGI-LM 1706042058.xlsm Tab:PVRRbyStation row 1875 and row¯Ï 883 -proposed station capital costs,and row 1873 and row 1881 -proposed station fixed cost,column U for resource "I DJ_CC Jl and I_DJ_CC_J1D".For example,levelized fixed costs in 2033 are $100.6 million. (n)The Company has not performed the requested analysis.Consistent with the procedural schedule adopted for this proceeding,the Company will update its economic analysis in its supplemental filing scheduled to be filed in mid-January 2018. (o)No,PacifiCorp does not agree that it would be necessary to re-run the entire 2017 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)to continue to demonstrate that the wind and transmission projects are the least-cost,least-risk resources.These resources were selected through the 2017 IRP process as least-cost and least-risk.PacifiCorp continues to analyze the benefits of the projects as part of its action plan items from the 2017 IRP.Updated economic analysis will be provided in the Company's supplemental filing scheduled to be filed in mid-January 2018. (p)PacifiCorp objects to this question as speculative. 17-035-40 /Rocky Mountain Power January 11,2018 UAE Data Request 3.2 UAE Data Request 3.2 Regarding PacifiCorp's Official Forward Price Curve (OFPC)issued in the 4th quarter of 2017 on or around December 29,2017: (a)Please provide a copy of the referenced price curve for gas and power markets where PacifiCorp transacts and for all years where a forecast was developed. (b)Please provide a description of how the long-term natural gas price forecast (i.e. prices developedby 3rd party consultants used in the OFPC for periods extending beyond 72 months)was developedin the referenced OFPC. (c)Please describe any changes to the long-term natural gas forecasting methodology that occurred in developing the referenced OFPC,relative to the OFPC that was used in the August 31,2017 SupplementalTestimony of Rick T.Link in Docket No 17-035- 23 (d)Please provide any memoranda or documentation in PacifiCorp's possession describing the methodologiesthe 3rd party consultants used to develop PacifiCorp's long-term natural gas price forecast in the referenced OFPC. (e)Please state when the long-term natural gas price forecasts used in the referenced OFPC were developedby the 3rd party consultants. (f)Please identifywhether the long-term price forecasts used to develop the referenced OFPC include the impact of the passage of the Tax Reform Bill. Response to UAE Data Request 3.2 The Company understands that the term "referenced OFPC"used throughoutthis request is intended to reference the Company's December 2017 official forward price curve (OFPC).Based on this understanding,the Company responds as follows: (a)Please refer to Attachment UAE 3.2-1,which provides the Company's December 2017 OFPC. (b)The December 29,2017 OFPC was developedusing 72 months of market forwards followed by 12 months (months 73 through 84)of a forwards-fundamentals blend that transitions to a pure fundamentals-based forecast starting in month 85.Blended prices for months 73 through 84 are calculated as an average of the preceding year's forward prices with the followingyear's fundamentals prices on a month-by-monthbasis. The fundamentals-based portion of the OPFC,starting month 85,was developed by an expert third-partyforecasting service and published in nominal dollars using PacifiCorp inflation indices.The expert third-partyfundamentals forecast was 17-035-40 /Rocky Mountain Power January 11,2018 UAE Data Request 3.2 supplied as part of the Company's ongoing subscription to receive multi-client "off- the-shelf"fundamentals-based forecasts on a regular basis. (c)The long-term natural gas forecasting methodology used by PacifiCorp to develop the December 29,2017 OFPC is unchanged relative to the OFPC that was used in the August 31,2017 SupplementalTestimony of Company witness,Rick T.Link in Docket 17-035-23. (d)Please refer to Confidential Attachment UAE 3.2-2. (e)The long-term natural gas price forecast used in the December 2017 OFPC was produced by an expert third-partyforecasting service,as part of its multi-client subscription service,on November 21,2017. (f)The impact of the Tax Reform Bill is not explicitly reflected in the gas price forecast, which was issued before the Tax Reform Bill was passed or signed,used in the December 2017 OFPC. Confidential information is provided subject to Public Service Commission of Utah Rule 746-1-602 and 746-1-603.