Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171004Wyoming_WIEC Set 5 1-12.pdfROCKY MOUNTAINPOWER A DIVISION OF PAClFICORP 1407 W North Temple,Suite 330 Salt Lake City,Utah 84116 September 25,2017 Abigail C.Briggerman,#7-5476 Holland &Hart LLP 6380 South Fiddlers Green Circle,Suite 500 Greenwood Village,CO 80111 RE:Wyoming Docket 20000-520-EA-17 WIEC 5 h Set Data Request (1-12) Please find enclosed Rocky Mountain Power's Responses to WIEC 5th Set Data Requests 5.1- 5.12.Also provided are Attachments WIEC 5.5-1,5.5-3,5.7-3,and 5.9.Provided on the enclosed Confidential CD are Confidential Attachments WIEC 5.7-1,and 5.7-2.The Confidential Attachment 5.5-2 will be provided on DVDS and arrive on September 27,2017. Confidential information is provided sub.ject to the terms and conditions of the protective agreement in this proceeding. If you have any questions,please call me at (307)632-2677. Sincerely, Stacy Splittstoesser, Manager,Regulation Enclosures C.C.:Meridith Bell/WPSC meridith.bell@wyo.gov(C) Lori L.Brand/WPSC lori.brand@wyo.gov (W) John Burbridge/WPSC john.brubride@wyo.gov (W) Michelle Bohanan/WPSC Michelle.bohanan@wyo.gov (W) Kara Seveland/WPSC kara.seveland@wyo.gov(W) Morgan Fish/WPSC mogaan.ñsh@wyo.gov(W) Dave Walker/WPSC dave.walker@wyo.gy (W) Perry McCollom/WPSC (W) Patti Penn/WIEC PP_egn_@hallanhart_co_m (W) Bob Pomeroy/WIEC rpomeroy hollandhart.com (W) Thor Nelson/WIEC (W) Emanuel Cocian/WIEC (W) Nik Stoffel/WIEC NSStoffel hollandhart.com (C)(W) Christopher Leger/OCA rjgopher.lege1@wyon(C) 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.1 WIEC Data Request 5.1 Please provide a copy of the System Optimizer User Guide. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.1 The Planning and Risk (PaR)model and System Optimizer model (SO model)are proprietary software licensed to the Company by ABB (formerly VENTYX).User manuals and associated documentation are considered confidential and ABB intellectual property,and may not be distributed by the Company to third parties under the terms of the license agreement.A confidentialityagreement between the recipient and ABB must be in place to receive this information.Please contact Stacy Splittstoesser at (307)632- 2677 to obtain the contact information at ABB for WIEC to execute an agreement directly with ABB for that information. Respondent:Dan Swan Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.2 WIEC Data Request 5.2 Please provide a copy of the Planning and Risk User Guide. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.2 Please refer to the Company's response to WIEC Data Request 5.1. Respondent:Dan Swan Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.3 WIEC Data Request 5.3 Please discuss in detail whether the Unit Commitment and Dispatch Algorithm implemented with the Planning and Risk model is a full chronological commitment that enforces generationoperating characteristics such as minimum up time,minimum down time,cold and hot start costs,must run status,etc. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.3 Yes,the Planning and Risk (PaR)model applies chronological unit commitment and dispatch that enforces generationoperating characteristics for minimum-upand minimum-down time,cold and hot start costs,must run -economic -peak commitment, ramp rates,run-up rates,operating reserves,emission contraints,and transmission constraints to minimize generationcost. Because the PaR model is a linear optimization model,unit commitment and dispatch are not independentalgorithms,but are instead optimized concurrentlywith all other model capabilities and constraints. Respondent:Dan Swan Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.4 WIEC Data Request 5.4 Please confirm that System Optimizers does not model an electrical network for transmission lines (like PROMOD IV Nodal does for example)but rather allows for economic power flows using a "pipeline"transport model with maximum capacity flow constraints.If the response is anything other than an unqualified confirmation,please explain in detail. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.4 Please refer to the Company's response to WIEC Data Request 5.1.The Company is not familiar with how the PROMOD IV Nodal model treats transmission lines,and therefore cannot comment on whether the System Optimizer model (SO model)is this type of model.The SO models a transmission topology with maximum capacity constraints between transmission areas. Respondent:Rick Link Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.5 WIEC Data Request 5.5 Please provide a full and unredacted copy of the Company's most recent integrated resource plan includingall appendices and supporting documentation. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.5 Please refer to Attachment WIEC 5.5-1,which provides a copy of PacifiCorp's 2017 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP),published on April 4,2017. Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.5-2,which provides a copy of the confidential data disks that accompanied the 2017 IRP,and Attachment WIEC 5.5-3, which provides a copy of the public data disk that accompanied the 2017 IRP. Confidential information is provided subject to the terms and conditions of the protective agreement in this proceeding. Respondent:Shay LaBray Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.6 WIEC Data Request 5.6 Are the stochastic simulations performed by the Planning and Risk model performed using a dependence structure for the random variables modeled?If yes,please provide that input in an electronic and fully executable format with formulae intact,includingthe work papers used to estimate the structure.If not,please explain in detail why not. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.6 The Company assumes that the term "dependence structure"refers to correlation among stochastic variables.Based on this assumption,the Company responds as follows: The Company applies correlation assumptions to the stochastic variables.The Company has applied the same stochastic parameters to its modeling in this proceeding as those used in the Company's 2017 IntegratedResource Plan (IRP).For a discussion on stochastic simulations performed by the Planning and Risk (PaR)model,please refer to PacifiCorp's 2017 IRP Volume I,Chapter 7 (Modeling and Portfolio Evaluation Approach),pages 156 through 166. The work papers for the stochastic parameters were provided on the public data disk that accompanied PacifiCorp's 2017 IRP,specifically folder "Chapters Appendix - Public\ChaptersAppendix\Appendix H -Stochastic Parameters".Please refer to the Company's response to WIEC Data Request 5.5,which provides copies of the public and confidential data disks that support PacifiCorp's 2017 IRP. Respondent:Rick Link Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 WIEC Data Request 5.7 Please provide the followingSystem Optimizer Inputs and Planning and Risk Inputsin an electronic and readily manipulable or executable format with all formulae intact: (a)Please provide a "bubble map"of the PacifiCorp System topography modeled in System Optimizer and Planning and Risk that indicates groups of resources,loads, transmission paths &limits,external market hubs,contract delivery locations,etc.If the system topology changes during the simulation period,please provide the base assumptions as well as the incremental changes over time and the effective dates of these changes. (b)For each "bubble"designated in the response to part a,list the generationresources, loads,contract delivery and market hub delivery that is connected to the bubble.If the system topology changes during the simulation period,please provide the base assumptions as well as the incremental changes over time and the effective dates of these changes. (c)For each transmission path connecting "bubbles"please identifythe transmission flow constraints for each transmission path.If the constraints differ dependent on the direction of the flow,please provide the flow constraints for each direction with a legend indicating the flow direction for each constraint.If the flow constraints change during the simulation period,please provide the base assumptions as well as the incremental changes over time and the effective dates of these changes. (d)Provide the hourly load curve for each load indicated in parts a.and b.for all years of the simulation period. (e)For each generatingresource modeled,please provide: i.The name of the generating unit. ii.The type of resource (i.e.,CCGT,CT,Steam Coal,etc.). iii.The date the unit was brought online. iv.The expected retirement date of the generating unit. v.The maximum stable net generating capacity. vi.The minimum stable net generating capacity. vii.The ramp up rate (MW/Hour). viii.The ramp down rate (MW/Hour). ix.The minimum up time (Hours). x.The minimum down time (Hours). 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 xi.Must run status. xii.Dedicated MW to spinning reserve (MW/Hour). xiii.Is the unit a quick start unit such that in can contribute to reserves with being committed? xiv.Variable Operations &Maintenance cost ($/MWh). xv.Fixed Operations &Maintenance cost ($/Year). xvi.Fixed Running Cost ($/Hour). xvii.Equivalent Forced Outage Rate. xviii.Mean Time Between Failures. xix.Mean Time To Repair. xx.Planned Outage Schedule. xxi.Any other regularlyscheduled changes to unit capacity or availability (for example -weekly deratings from midnight to four am on Saturdays to clean a coal chute). xxii.Any expected capital investments for each year of the study horizon. (f)For each thermal generating resource modeled,please provide: i.Primary Fuel Type. ii.Primary Fuel Cost ($/MMBtu). iii.Start Fuel Type. iv.Start Fuel Cost ($/MMBtu). v.Cold Start Energy (MMBtu). vi.Hot Start Energy (MMBtu). vii.Cold Start Fixed Cost ($). viii.Number of Hours shut down defining a cold start (Hours). ix.Shut Down Cost ($). x.Net Heat Rate in the form of any of the following: 1.Pairs of loading points (MW)and Average Heat Rate (MMBtu/MWh)with a minimum of 5 pairs of points. 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 2.Pairs of loading points (MW)and Incremental Heat Rate (MMBtu/MWh) with a minimum of 5 pairs of points. 3.Input output equation:MMBtu =a0 +al*P +a2*P^2 where P is MWh (or another polynomial equation). xi.If the unit is a Combined Cycle and the CTs are modeled separately from the steam turbine,provide an equation (or table with at least 5 data points)relating heat exhausted (MMBtu)from the CT at loading points from the minimum stable operating point to the maximum stable operating point as well as an efficiency table for the steam turbine in the same form as 'x'above. (g)For each owned renewable resource,please provide: i.The hourly generationcurve used to model the resource in System Optimizer and Planning and Risk. (h)For each purchased power contract,please provide: i.The inception date of the contract. ii.The expiration Date of the contract. iii.The effective dates of the contract. iv.The hourlyenergy supply curve. v.The hourlyper unit price of the contract. vi.Is the contract firm -i.e.,can it count towards capacity and/or reserve requirements? vii.Is the contract a must take contract or is the volume dependent on economics viii.Any fixed demand payments associated with the contract. (i)For each power sales contract,please provide: i.The inception date of the contract. ii.The expiration Date of the contract. iii.The effective dates of the contract. iv.The hourly energy supply curve. v.The hourlyper unit price of the contract. vi.Is the contract firm? 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 vii.Is the contract a must take contract or is the volume dependent on economics? viii.Any fixed demand payments associated with the contract. (j)For each market hub,please provide: i.The hourly limits on energy purchases. ii.The hourlylimits on energy sales. iii.The hourlyper unit price for energy purchases. iv.The hourlyper unit price for energy sales. (k)For each new candidate resource,please provide: i.The capital cost of the resource in $/kW. ii.A levelized fixed charge rate used. iii.The operating life assumed. iv.The economic life assumed. v.Expected fixed O&M costs in $/kW-year. vi.Any information from subparts e.thru i.relevant to the resource to model production costs. vii.Limitations on when the unit could be constructed or acquired. viii.Limitations on the number of units that can be constructed per year,over the study horizon,etc. ix.Any expected capital investments required by year for all years of the study horizon. (1)Please prove all escalation rate and discount rate assumptions. (m)For the new transmission resources considered,please provide: i.The capital cost of the asset in $/kW. ii.The starting and terminal points corresponding to the bubbles identifies in subpart a. iii.The length of the line. iv.The capacity of the line in both directions. v.The economic life. 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 vi.The operating life. vii.A levelized fixed charge rate used. viii.The operating life assumed. ix.The economic life assumed. x.Expected fixed O&M costs in $/kw-year. xi.Limitations on when the line could be constructed or acquired. xii.Any expected capital investments required by year for all years of the study horizon. xiii.The expected per unit impedance and reactance. xiv.The expended loss factor as a function of line loading. (n)For the existing transmission paths,please provide: i.The starting and terminal points corresponding to the bubbles identifies in subpart a. ii.The length of the line. iii.The capacity of the line in both directions. iv.The economic life. v.The operating life. vi.The operating life assumed. vii.The economic life assumed. viii.Expected fixed O&M costs in $/kW-year. ix.Any expected capital investments required by year for all years of the study horizon. x.The per unit impedance and reactance. xi.The loss factor equation as a function of line loading. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.7 The Company objects to this request as overlybroad,undulyburdensome,and requiring development of a special study or information not readily available in the format 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 requested or maintained in the ordinary course of business.Without waiving these objections,the Company responds as follows: Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides the requested information relevant to the System Optimizer model (SO),and Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides the requested information relevant to the Planning and Risk (PaR)model.For subparts (e)through (n),these attachments explain where the requested data is located in files alreadyprovided.The non-Excel input files can be opened and read in "Notepad"or similar common software. Please refer to the confidential work papers supporting the Direct Testimony of Company witness,Rick T.Link.Specifically,please refer to the followingwork papers and documents: SO model -input and output files are located in folder "SO Model Inputs-Outputs\ SO Model Inputs-Outputs\Price-emissionsscenarios\Gateway\" -Within this folder,select the study folder to examine (e.g.,the "RPCC-RPN- EGI-MN"study). PaR model -input and output files are located in folder "PaR Inputs-Outputs\PaR Inputs-Outputs\Price-emissions scenarios\Gateway\" -Within this folder,select the study folder to examine (e.g.,the "PRPCC-RPN- EGI-MN"study). Supporting files -folders "Other Summary Reports"and "Transmission Projects",for files containing input information regarding the new wind and transmission projects. Inflation and Discount Rate -folder "Exhibits Figures Tables",specifically the file "Gateway Results Direct Testimony".Refer to tab "Price -Policy Annual -SO". Key information regarding resource options available to the SO model capacity expansion model are provided in PacifiCorp's 2017 IntegratedResource Plan (IRP), Chapter 6 (Resource Options),specifically Table 6.1 (2017 Supply Side Resource Table). Please refer to: http://www.pacificorp.com/content/dam/pacificorp/doc/Energy Sources/Integrated Re:so urce Plan/2017 IRP/2017 IRP VolumeI IRP Final.pdf A copy of PacifiCorp's 2017 IRP and the supporting data disks is provided with the Company's response to WIEC Data Request 5.5. Coal Master Assumption -2017 IRP Confidential Data Disk 2,folder "Assumptions +Inputs Conf.zip\Assumptions +Inputs\Master Assumptions,CONF\Vol III RH5a". 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 Loads -\2017 IRP Confidential Data Disk 2,folder "Assumptions +Inputs Conf.zip\Assumptions +Inputs\Load,CONF". SO Model For any specific case folder in "SO Model Inputs-Outputs"(see above),please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides information helpful in locating the data responsive to subparts (e)through (n): The SO model assigns all entities (resources,contracts,transmission areas,etc.)an identification number (ID),and this ID is used to identifythe entities within the input "gms"files as follows: -The "Sets.GMS Resource list"tab provides the entity ID for each resource name. The entityIDs are provided in the Sets.gms file. -The "Market Names"tab maps market names to market IDs. -The "Sets.GMS Fuel list"tab maps fuel names to fuel IDs. -The "Energy Price ID List"tab maps contracts,demand-side management (DSM), and qualifying facilities (QFs)to their respective IDs. -For convenience,the Company has broken out the "Capacity Factor ID list"tab, providing the ID mapping for resources that may be of key interest such as renewables. The "GMS file list"tab lists the categories of ".gms"data files and the relevant file names for reference. The "WIEC 5.7 (E-N)"tab indicates each part of this data request,and indicates if the requested data is a SO modeling input,and indicates the file name where the data can be found. The "Example -Thermal Inputdata"tab provides an example resource (CL_JBridgerl),indicating the requested data element and the corresponding value for that resource.By searching the "Thermal.gms"file (represented in column E),for a data element named in column A,it is possible to find the data value,which is displayed in the example in column B. PaR Model For any specific case folder in "PaR Inputs-Outputs"(see above),please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides information helpful in locating the data responsive to subparts (e)through (n): 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 The "PaR Files"tab lists the categories of .Dat data files and relevant file names for reference. The "WIEC 5.7 E-N"tab indicates each part of this data request,indicates if the requested data is a PaR modeling input,and indicates the file name where the data is provided. The "Entity Map"tab provides the entity ID for each resource,transmission path, market,and load area,as well as the associated file type to locate the information.For example,"CL_Craigl"data is provided in the Thermal.dat file. The "Example -Thermal Inputdata"tab provides an example resource (Cholla), indicating the requested data element and the corresponding value for that resource. By searching the "Thermal.dat"file (represented in column A),for a data element noted in column G,it is possible to find the data value,which is listed alongside the data element.For example,Cholla's "CapacityMax"values can be seen in cells A13:A16,dated by year,and all reporting a value of 387.00 (megawatts (MW)). Subparts (a)through(n): (a)Please refer to Attachment WIEC 5.7-3,which provides the 2017 IRP Transmission Topology.The topology is not created by the SO model or PaR model as a report;this is manuallycreated and reports the transmission areas (bubbles)by east control area (ECA)and west control area (WCA),including transmission paths,load location, thermal generation,and liquid markets.Not listed in the topology are groups of resources,transmission ratings,or contract delivery locations.The information regarding resource location is reported in the inputs files for subparts (b)through (n) below.For the SO model,refer to "Sets.gms",and for the PaR model,refer to attribute "TransArea"for resource location in the PaR "Entity Map"(see above). (b)Please refer to the Company's response to subpart (a)above. (c)Please refer to the Company's responses to subparts (m)and (n)below. (d)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer to the "PaR Files"tab which maps load entities to the load data files.The SO models in the "SO Model Input-Output"folder groups load areas and so is not referenced. (e)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides SO model information as described in the "WIEC 5.7 (E-N)"tab,data request section e. Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer to the "PaR Files"tab which maps thermal and hydro entities to thermal and hydro data files as described in the "WIEC 5.7 E-N"tab,data request section e.The specific generationresources are listed in the "Entity Map"tab. 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 (f)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides SO model information as described in the "WIEC 5.7 (E-N)"tab,data request section f. Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer to the "PaR Files"tab which maps thermal entities to thermal data files as described in the "WIEC 5.7 E-N"tab,data request section f.The specific generationresources are listed in the "Entity Map"tab. (g)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides SO model information as described in the "WIEC 5.7 (E-N)"tab,data request section g. Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer to the "PaR Files"tab which maps thermal entities to thermal data files as described in the "WIEC 5.7 E-N"tab,data request section g.The specific renewable resources are listed in the "Entity Map"tab. (h)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer to the "PaR Files"tab which maps "Thermal","Existing Block Forward","Fixed Energy",and "Swing"entities to data files as described in the "WIEC 5.7 E-N"tab,data request section h.The specific power purchase agreements (PPA)are listed in the "Entity Map"tab. (i)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides SO model information as described in the "WIEC 5.7 (E-N)"tab,data request section i. Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer to the "PaR Files"tab which maps "Existing Block Forward"entities to data files as described in the "WIEC 5.7 E-N"tab,data request section i.The specific sales contracts are listed in the "Entity Map"tab. (j)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides SO model information as described in the "WIEC 5.7 (E-N)"tab,data request section j. Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer to the "PaR Files"tab which maps "Energy Markets" entities to data files as described in the "WIEC 5.7 E-N"tab,data request section j. The specific market hubs are listed in the "Entity Map"tab. (k)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides SO model information as described in the "WIEC 5.7 (E-N)"tab,data request section k. Althoughnot asked in the data request,the demand side resources are modeled for selection in the SO model which information is provided. Resource additions selected in each study portfolio are an output of the SO model. These selections are passed into the PaR model.Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.7 to the "PaR Files"tab,"System Optimizer Plan"file,as indicated in the "WIEC 5.7 E-N tab",data request section k. (1)Inflation rate 2.22 percent;Discount Rate 6.57 percent. (m)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides SO model information as described in the "WIEC 5.7 (E-N)"tab,data request section m. Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer to the "PaR Files"tab which maps "Transmission Link"entities to data files as described in the "WIEC 5.7 E-N"tab,data request section m.New transmission resources refer to the "AE-WY.To.Brdger"path. (n)Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-1,which provides SO model information as described in the "WIEC 5.7 (E-N)"tab,data request section m. Please refer to Confidential Attachment WIEC 5.7-2,which provides PaR model information;specifically,refer to the "PaR Files"tab which maps "Transmission Link"entities to data files as described in the "WIEC 5.7 E-N"tab,data request section n.The specific transmission paths are listed in the "Entity Map"tab. Confidential information is provided subject to the terms and conditions of the protective agreement in this proceeding. Respondent:Dan Swan /Randy Baker Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.8 WIEC Data Request 5.8 Please provide an updated version of Table 2 found on Page 35 in the Direct Testimony of Mr.Link that assumes capital costs for the combined projects increase by 10%,i.e., there is a 10%overrun when constructing the combined projects. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.8 The Company objects to this request on the basis that the Company does not have custody,possession or control of the information being requested.The request requires development of a special study or information not maintained in the ordinary course of business.Without waiving this objection,the Company responds as follows: The Wyoming Industrial Energy Consumers (WIEC)have the information required to perform this analysis.Please refer to the confidential work papers provided with the Direct Testimony of Company witness,Rick T.Link,specifically folder "Other Summary Reports",the file "Gateway_IRP Data.xlsx". Real levelized costs,in dollars,for the Aeolus-to-Bridger/Anticlineproject are located in column Q of the worksheet named "Gateway". Real levelized costs,in millions of dollars,for the 230 kilovolt (kV)upgrades are included in column Q of the worksheet named "Summary All Wind". Real levelized costs,in dollars,for the proxy wind benchmark resources are located in the column N of the worksheet named "Summary All Wind". The net present value (NPV)of each of these streams of data calculated over the period 2017 through 2036 assuming a 6.57 percent discount rate represents the present value of revenue requirements (PVRR)associated with the capital for the combined projects incorporated into Table 2 of Mr.Link's Direct Testimony.This figure can be multiplied by 10 percent to capture the incremental increase in cost that would be associated with an assumed 10 percent cost overrun that can be added as a positive value to all of the numbers in Table 2 of Mr.Link's Direct Testimony.The value would not change among the price-policy scenarios. Respondent:Rick Link Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.9 WIEC Data Request 5.9 Please provide a probability distribution of net capacity factor for the wind site.If the Company did not assess the risk of the wind blowing via probability distribution,please provide the risk assessment for the wind site analyzed by the Company.If this assessment does not exist,please discuss in detail whythe Company did not assess the risk of the wind. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.9 The Company objects to this request on the basis that it does not have custody, possession or control of the requested information.Specifically,it does not have a probability distribution of net capacity factor for the various wind sites.This assessment will be performed once the wind turbine equipment supply has been secured and the wind turbine layout has been finalized. Please refer to Attachment WIEC 5.9,which summarizes the annual capacity factors at the Company's existing wind projects.The Company is aware of variability in capacity factors for Wyoming wind resources,as demonstrated in the operational history of its existing Wyoming wind projects. Respondent:Ian Andrews Witness:Chad Teply 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.10 WIEC Data Request 5.10 Please provide the break even net capacity factor for the combined projects under the medium gas zero CO2 and medium gas medium CO2 cases. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.10 The Company objects to this request on the basis that it does not have custody, possession or control of the requested information.The request requires development of a special study or information not maintained in the ordinary course of business. Respondent:Dan Swan Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,20 17 WIEC Data Request 5.11 WIEC Data Request 5.11 Please provide the break even percentage increase in capital costs for the combined projects under the medium gas zero CO2 and medium gas medium CO2 cases. Response to WIEC Data Request 5.11 The Company objects to this request on the basis that it does not have custody, possession or control of the requested information.The request requires development of a special study or information not maintained in the ordinary course of business.Without waiving this objection,the Company responds as follows: The Wyoming Industrial Energy Consumers'(WIEC)can estimate the level of capital costs that would cause the Combined Projects to achieve break-even economics using data contained in the Direct Testimony of Company witness,Rick T.Link,specifically Exhibit RMP (RTL-5).This exhibit includes these line item "Transmission Project Capital Recovery"plus "Incremental Transmission Revenue"+"New Wind Capital Recovery"under Project Net Costs for each price-policy scenario.The present value of revenue requirements differential (PVRR(d))for these line items can be multipliedby a percentage that offsets the PVRR(d)for the "Net (Benefit)/Cost"line item for any given price-policy scenario. For instance,in the medium natural gas and medium carbon dioxide (CO2)price scenario, the PVRR(d)for "Transmission Project Capital Recovery"plus "Incremental Transmission Revenue"+"New Wind Capital Recovery"is $1,959 million,which reflects the value of capital cost recovery for transmission and new wind.The PVRR(d) for the "Net (Benefit)/Cost"line item is $137 million.If the PVRR(d)for the combined transmission plus new wind line item is multipliedby approximately 107 percent,the capital cost recovery for transmission and new wind line items would drop by approximately $137 million,thereby causing the PVRR(d)for the "Net (Benefit)/Cost" line item to be zero (i.e.,break-even economics). The capital costs for transmission,$717.5 million,and new wind,$1,369 million,are provided in Mr.Link's Direct Testimony,specifically Confidential Exhibit RMP (RTL- 1)and total $2,086.5 million.Multiplyingthe $2,086.5 by 107 percent would equal the capital investment of $2,232.6 million for the breakeven. Respondent:Dan Swan Witness:Rick Link 20000-520-EA-17 /Rocky Mountain Power September 25,2017 WIEC Data Request 5.12 WIEC Data Request 5.12 Please provide System Optimizer outputs for each of the scenarios and sensitivities studied in a format to those filed by PacifiCorp on its IRP Support Webpage athttpfw_wwg.com es/irp_/irggup_porthtrn_l.If possible please provide the outputs in both a present value and nominal dollars.If this is not available,please provide the discount rate assumptions necessary to convert the present value to nominal.For reference purposes,the three files that show the system optimizer outputs similar to those we are seeking are: (a)http://www.pacificorp.com/content/dam/pacificorp/doc/Energy Sources/Integrated Ressum-2015IRP RH1-SORepartPa_ck_age-03162015.xlsx (b)http;//www.pacificorp.com/content/dam/pacificorp/doc/Enerav Sources/Integrated R esource Plan/2015IRP/PacifiCorp-20l5IRP RH2-SOReportPackage-03162015.xlsx (c)hy:m c_ontentitanciñegg/_dodEgergyjoure ad R esource Plan/2015IRP/JPacifrC_orp-2015]IR_P_SensitivityiO_R._ep_o_rt_ac_ka_ge- 03162015.xlsx Response to WIEC Data Request 5.12 Please refer to the confidential work papers supporting the direct testimony of Company witness,Rick T.Link,specifically the folder "SO Model Summary Reports"for the System Optimizer model (SO model)study results,and the folder "SO Model Inputs- Outputs"for the SO model studies input and output files.PacifiCorp used a discount rate of 6.57 percent in present-value calculations used in its economic analysis. Respondent:Dan Swan Witness:Rick Link