Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20101130PAC to IIPA 134-143.pdf" ~~~OUNTAIN i-"C ~,J ~o.= rylln \lfW ':n M" 9: 48lJJiU r'HJ ii yoU 201 South Main, Suite 2300 Salt Lake Cit, Utah 84111 November 29, 2010 Eric L. Olsen ISB# 4811 Racine, Olson Nye, Budge & Bailey, Chaered P.O. Box 1391; 201 E. Center Pocatello, Idaho 83204-1391 RE: ID PAC-E-10-07 IIPA Data Request (134-143) Please find enclosed Rocky Mounta Power's responses to lIP A Data Requests ~-143. Provided on the enclosed CD are Attchments IIPA 137 -(1-2) and 138 -(1-2). Provided on the enclosed Confdential CD are Confdential Atthments IIPA 136, 139 -(1-2), and 142. The Confidential Atthments are Confdenti and are provided to pares tht have signed a protective order in ths docket. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (801) 220-2963. Sincerely, ~'.Tdw~¿~ J. Ted Weston Manger, Reguation Enclosur: cc: Rady Budge/Monsanto (C) Jean JewelllUC (C)/3 copies Anthony Y anellIP A (C) Ben OtolICL (C) James R. Smithonsanto (C) Richad AndersonIonsto (C) George C. Carer, llI/onsanto (C) Denns PeseauIonsanto (C) Gareth R. KajanderlMonsanto (C) Mauce Brubaker/Monsanto (C) Brian Collin/Monsto (C) Michal Gormanonsanto (C) Kathn IversonIonsto (C) Mak Widmer/Monsanto (C) .. P AC-E-1 0-07 !Rocky Mounta Power November 29,2010 LIP A Data Request 134 LIP A Data Request 134 Regarding Ms. Hunter's sttement on page 6 liens 8-10 of her rebutt testimony, is she recmmending that the Agrcultual Energy Saver program be eliminated: 1) solely by itself; 2) in conjunction with her recommendations to cut back and/or chage the Irrgation load control progr, or 3) as a separate option tht could be considered afer her recommendations regarding the Irgation load control program were implemented? Response to lIP A Data Request 134 Mr. Gryson diects the Company to "endeavor to fid ways to pursue all cost- effective DSM while strving toward greater balance with regard to customer segment equity". DSM expenditues to support agcultu programs (Idaho irgation load control program and Agrcultual Energy Savers) represented 81 % of the Company's investment in 2009. If the Commsion seeks to achieve balance, Ms. Hunter suggested that since the Agrcultual Energy Savers program's cost effectiveness is less th irrgation load control, suspension of the Agricultual Energy Savers progr would be preferable. Later in her testiony' she recommends that if the Commission is seeking to reduce the tota costs associated with the DSM programs, based on cost- effectiveness, suspension of the Agrcultual Energy Savers program would be preferable to other program. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hunter Carol Hunter '~~'-~ PAC-E-10-07!Rocky Mountain Power November 29, 2010 LIP A Data Request 135 LIP A Data Request 135 Oter than chaging the overall energy effciency portfolio cost effectiveness from 1.93 to 2.05 as measured by the utilty cost test (Hunter rebutt pages 5-6), what other benefits would accrue if the Agrcultual Energy Saver program was elimiated? Response to lIP A Data Request 135 The improvement in overall energy effciency portfolio cost effectiveness from 1.93 to 2.05 is not techncally a benefit but rather suggests the portfolio's benefit per dollar invested improves slightly provided the program is eliminated. Eliminating the program actuly reduces the overall portfolio's net benefit by $400,000. The Agrcultual Energy Saver program's 2009 results indicate, from a utility perspective, the program was cost-effective, just less so than other programs in the Company's portolio. The elimtion of the program, by virte of reducing program expenditus in the agrcultul sector, would reduce the percentage of portfolio investment in the agrcultual sector and increase the percentae of portolio investment across the remaing non-agcultu customer sectors, providing a more equa yet not equa distrbution of costs across all customer sectors. Furer, the on-going cost ofDSM in Idao would be lower than it otherwse will be with Agricultual Energy Savers. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hunter Carol Hunter P AC-E-l 0-07 !Rocky Mountai Power November 29,2010 LIP A Data Request 136 UP A Data Request 136 Please provide copies of the thee thid-par vendor agreements referenced on page 6 line 13 of Ms. Hunter's testiony. Response to UP A Data Request 136 Please refer to Confidential Attchment LIP A 136. The agreements being provided are confdential and ar provided subject to the ters and conditions of the protective agreement in this proceedg. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hunter Carol Hunter P AC-E-1 0-07 !Rocky Mounta Power November 29,2010 LIP A Data Request 137 LIP A Data Request 137 Please provide copies of the reques for proposal that was issued in July as referenced on page 6 lines 15-16 of Ms. Hunter's testimony. Response to UPA Data Request 137 Please refer to Attchments LIP A 137 -1 and LIP A 137 -2. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hunter Carol Hunter PAC-E-1 0-07 !Rocky Mountai Power November 29,2010 LIP A Data Request 138 UP A Data Request 138 Pleas provide copies of the cancellation of the request for proposal that was issued as referenced on page 6 line 16 of Ms. Hunter's testiony. Response to UP A Data Request 138 Please refer to Atthments liP A 138 -1 and LIP A 138-2. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hunter Carol Hunter P AC-E-l 0-07/Rocky Mountain Power November 29,2010 LIP A Data Request 139 UP A Data Request 139 Whch two agreements were exteded though 2011 as referenced on page 6 lines 19-20 of Ms. Hunter's testony? Pleae provide copies of these extensions. Response to lIP A Data Request 139 Please refer to Confdential Atthments LIP A 139 -1 and LIP A 139 -2. These agreements ar confdential and are provided subject to the ters and conditions of the protective agreement in ths proceeding. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hunter Carol Hunter PAC-E-I0-07!Rocky Mounta Power November 29,2010 LIP A Data Request 140 IIPA Data Request 140 Please explai why any control unt purchased before or durg 2011 has a reasonable probabilty of only being in servce one year as referenced on page 7 lines 5.6 of Ms. Hunter's testimony. . Response to UPA Data Request 140 Due to the expirig delivery and equipment vendor contracts, the Company intends to competitively rebid the program's delivery in 2011 for the 2012 control season. Should the successfu applicant(s) choose to migrate to alternative equipment and communcation platform at that time, any equipment the Compay acquires in 2011 would be obsolete by 2012. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hunter Carol Hunter PAC-E-10-07!Rocky Mountan Power November 29,2010 LIP A Data Request 141 IIPA Data Request 141 On the bottom of page 10 of Ms. Hunter's testimony, there is a table. One of the colums lists a benefit of $44/k. Please provide all work papers that demonstrate how this value was developed and how it relates to any demand related avoided cost values tht the Company has used in its most recent IR. Response to IIPA Data Request 141 The $44/kW-yr is the product of $8,437,440 credit provided through the allocation process divided by 191.76 mw provided in Mr. Eelkema's testiony. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hunter Carol Hunter P AC-E-l 0-07 !Rocky Mounta Power November 29, 2010 LIP A Data Request 142 IIPA Data Request 142 Please provide all data reports, and anysis that were prepared in 2009 and 2010 regarding the removal of load from the varous distrbutions circuits as referenced on page 11 of Ms. Hunter's testimony. Response to IIPA Data Request 142 Please refer to Confdential Atthment LIP A 142. Ths inormation is confdential and is provided subject to the terms and conditions of the protective agreement. in this proceedig. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hooter Carol Hunter P AC-E-l 0-07/Rocky Mountan Power November 29, 2010 LIP A Data Request 143 IIPA Data Request 143 Please list all times, all circuits, and all loads that had two dispatch periods as referenced on page 11 lines 14-20 of Ms. Hunter's testimony. Response to IIPA Data Request 143 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00PM 3:00PM 4:00PM 5:00PM 6:00PM 7:00PM 56,04.35 56,04.35 56,04.35 56,04.35 118,n6.22 118,n6.22 118,776.22 118,n6.22 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 91,079.43 91,079.43 91,079.43 91,079.43 91,079.43 56,04.3 56,04.3 56,04.3 149,123.8 211,855.7 211,855.7 211,855.7 211,855.7 2,000.0 In addition, staing late in July approximately 26 megawatts were dispatched at 7:00 am. asa result of contiuig issues on ciruits out of Big Grassy. Recordholder: Sponsor: Carol Hunter Carol Hunter