Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090306Staff 1-8 to PAC.pdfSCOTT WOODBURY DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 472 WEST WASHINGTON STREET PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 (208) 334-0320 BARNO. 1895 Street Address for Express Maìl: 472 W. WASHINGTON BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983 Attorney for the Commission Staff RECE ~:rì in09 MAR -6 PM 2: 20 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER FOR APPROVAL) OF AN ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT )MECHANISM. ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. P AC-E-08-8 FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER The Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its attorney of record, Scott Woodbury, Deputy Attorney General, requests that Rocky Mountain Power (Company; Rocky Mountain) provide the following documents and information as soon as possible, but no later than FRIDAY, MARCH 27, 2009. This Production Request is to be considered as continuing, and Rocky Mountain Power is requested to provide, by way of supplementary responses, additional documents that it or any person acting on its behalf may later obtain that wil augment the documents produced. For each item, please indicate the name of the person(s) preparing the answers, along with the job title of such person(s) and the witness who can sponsor the answer at hearing. In addition to the written copies provided as response to the questions, please provide all Excel and electronic fies on CD with formulas activated and operationaL. FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER MARCH 6, 2009 REQUEST NO.1: Please provide a backcast of the methodology that the Company is proposing for the period January 2006 to present. Show how the accounts included in the ECAM mechanism would have changed over the period and why the calculation of the Energy Cost Adjustment Mechanism (ECAM) rate for each anual period and how the monthly deferral balance would have changed during the period when ECAM rates were in effect. REQUEST NO.2: Please provide the same backcast information provided for Request No. 1 with ECAM methodology modified to include: a) 90/1 0 customer/company sharing of deferred power supply costs b) An adjustment of $30/MWH for load above or below monthly normalized loads approved by the Commission c) An anual interest rate of 2% applied to the deferral balance REQUEST NO.3: Please provide a description of power supply tracking mechanisms either existing or proposed in other PacifiCorp state jurisdictions. Include in the description the power supply accounts tracked and the history of rate adjustments since inception. REQUEST NO.4: Please describe the risk management strategy employed by the Company for market energy/capacity purchases and how that strategy could/wil impact the power supply costs that flow through the proposed ECAM mechanism. REQUEST NO.5: Please provide the unbundled production revenue requirement per kWh on a system basis that is curently embedded in rates. REQUEST NO.6: To evaluate the impact of an Idaho ECAM on corporate financial statements, please quantify and provide the workpapers showing the anual impact on total Company earings. Please include at least the impact in dollars, cash flow impact, change in percent or basis points of retur on equity, etc. Please provide workpapers in Excel with formulas activated and operationaL. FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 2 MARCH 6, 2009 REQUEST NO.7: Gregory Duvall on page 2 of testimony discusses volatUity largely outside the Company's control. For each factor please provide a list of each process and description of that process utilized by the Company to control the volatilty. In the answer also identify the areas where the process is completed, for instance a process for planning, modeling, operations, etc. REQUEST NO.8: Please provide analyses showing why a 90/1 0 customer/Company sharing of deferred power supply costs is inadequate or not appropriate. DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 6 ~ay of March 2009. Technical Staff: i:umisc:prodreq/pace08.8swkhrltc prod req i FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 3 MARCH 6, 2009 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2009, SERVED THE FOREGOING FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO PACIFICORP DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER, IN CASE NO. PAC-E-08-8, BY MAILING A COPY THEREOF, POSTAGE PREPAID, TO THE FOLLOWING: TED WESTON MGR, ID REGULATORY AFFAIRS ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 201 S MAIN ST STE 2300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 E-MAIL: ted.weston(ipacificorp.com DATA REQUEST RESPONSE CENTER PACIFICORP 825 NE MUL TNOMAH STE 2000 PORTLAND OR 97232 E-MAIL: datareguest(ipacificorp.com KA TIE IVERSON BRUBAKER & ASSOCIATES 17244 W CORDOVA COURT SURPRISE AZ 85387 E-MAIL: kiverson(iconsultbai.com ERIC L OLSEN RACINE OLSON NYE BUDGE & BAILEY 201 E CENTER PO BOX 1391 POCATELLO ID 83204 E-MAIL: elo(iracinelaw.net DANIEL SOLANDER SENIOR COUNSEL ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 201 S MAIN ST STE 2300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 E-MAIL: daniel.solander(ipacificorp.com RANDALL C BUDGE RACINE OLSON NYE BUDGE & BAILEY 201 E CENTER PO BOX 1391 POCATELLO ID 83204 E-MAIL: rcb(iracinelaw.net JAMES R SMITH MONSANTO COMPANY E-MAIL: jim.r.smithaYmonsanto.com ELECTRONIC COPIES ONLY ANTHONY Y ANKEL 29814 LAKE ROAD BAY VILLAGE OH 44140 E-MAIL: tony(iyanel.net SECRETARY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE