20070912PAC to IIPA 5-1 to 5-3.pdf

~~~~OUNTAIN 201 South Main, Suite 2300
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
,-. .r.
,..,. j', '~;: \
:= l '
zon'/ SEP I 2 (\;'1 9: I j
September 11 , 2007 !DAi'iO
TT.JT1ES
Eric Olsen
Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Assoc
Racine, Olsen, Nye, Budge & Bailey
201 East Center
Pocatello , ID 83204
RE:PAC-07-
IIPA Set 5 (1-
Please find enclosed Rocky Mountain Power s Responses to IIP A 5th Set Data Requests
1 - 5.3. Provided on the enclosed CD are Attachments IIPA 5.5.2 and 5.3. The
Response to IIP A Data Request 5.4 is in process and will be provided when available.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
lIP
Brian Dickman, Manager
Regulation
Enclosures
Cc:Tony Y ankel/IIP A
Jean Jewell/IPUC
Randall C. Budge/Monsanto
James R. Smith/Monsanto
Maurice BrubakerlMonsanto
Richard Anderson/Energy Strategies
Conley WardiAgrium
Dennis Peseau/ Agrium
Brad Purdy/CAPAI
Timothy Shurtz
P AC- E-07 -05/Rocky Mountain Power
September 11 , 2007
lIP A 5th Set Data Request 5.
lIP A Data Request 5.
With respect to the Company s response to IPUC Request 25, here is a figure
listed for Schedule 10 or -001 %. Please answer the following:
a. Does this figure mean that the actual usage was 8% higher or lower than the
usage predicted by the sample?
b. Were the sample results increase/decreased by the 8% figure in order to
develop coincident and non-coincident demand data for the Irrigation class?
c. Presumably the "sample" data is on a calendar month basis and the
population" data is on a billing month basis. How were (if at all) these two
sets of data put on the same time basis?
d. What were the energy values there were being compared for the "sample" and
for the "population" that resulted in the difference in 8.001 %?
e. Over what time frame was the "summer months , and what were the energy
values there were being compared for the "sample" and for the "population
that resulted in the difference in 6.623%?
f. Which sample customers were on Schedule 72 or 72A during the 2006
Schedule 10 load research study? Please simply provide the identification
numbers used in the load research data.
Response to liP A Data Request 5.
a. For calendar year 2006, the energy calculated by the load research sample was
001 % less than the calendar adjusted billing energy for the same period.
b. The net, annual adjustment to coincident loads was 8.001%. It should be
noted, however, that these loads are adjusted on a monthly basis. These
individual monthly adjustment factors were provided in the response to IIP
1- 7. No adjustment was applied to non-coincident loads.
c. Billing energy was adjusted to a calendar month basis for comparison and
adjustment purposes.
d. This information has been provided in the response to IIP A 1-
e. Summer months include calendar months June, July and August. The relevant
energy values were provided in the response to IIP A 1-
f. The load research identification numbers have been provided in Attachment
IIPA 5.1
(Scott D. Thornton prepared this response and is the recordholder. It has not been
determined who will sponsor this response at hearing. Please contact Brian
Dickman at 801-220-4975 to discuss this response.
IDAHO
P A C- E-07 -
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
lIP A DATA REQUEST SET 5 (1-
ATTACHMENT lIP A 5.
ON THE ENCLOSED CD
PAC-O7-05/Rocky Mountain Power
September 11 , 2007
IIP A 5th Set Data Request 5.2
lIP A Data Request 5.
Regarding the Company s response to IPUC request 27 , it is stated that the
Company conducted an analysis of Schedule 36 usage over a test period ended
September 2005 and that load research data used in the study demonstrated "that
Schedule 36 load often reaches its peak during off-peak hours, while Schedule
peaks during the on-peak hours." Please supply a list of the identification
numbers in the load research data for customers that are presently on Schedule 36
as well as those that were on Schedule 36 during the referenced study.
Response to liP A Data Request 5.
Please refer to Attachment IIPA5.2 for a list of identification numbers of the
load research customers used in Schedule 36 for the time periods 12 months
ending September 2005 and 12 months ending December 2006.
(Scott D. Thornton prepared this response and is the recordholder. It has not been
determined who will sponsor this response at hearing. Please contact Brian
Dickman at 801-220-4975 to discuss this response.
IDAHO
P AC-07-
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
lIP A DATA REQUEST SET 5 (1-
ATTACHMENT lIP A 5.
ON THE ENCLOSED CD
PAC-07-05/Rocky Mountain Power
September 11 , 2007
IIPA 5th Set Data Request 5.
lIP A Data Request 5.
Contained in the Company s response to IPUC 27-1 is an ID Residential Time-of-
Use Program Analysis for 2005. Contained in that analysis are four graphs.
Please supply in electronic format the data points for each of those graphs.
Response to lIP A Data Request 5.
The requested information is provided as Attachment IIPA 5.
(Scott D. Thornton prepared this response and is the recordholder. It has not been
determined who will sponsor this response at hearing. Please contact Brian
Dickman at 801-220-4975 to discuss this response.
IDAHO
P AC-07-
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
lIP A DATA REQUEST SET 5 (1-
ATTACHMENT lIP A 5.
ON THE ENCLOSED CD