Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20020801_223.pdfTO: FROM: DATE: RE: DECISION MEMORANDUM COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSIONER HANSEN JEAN JEWELL RON LAW LOU ANN WESTERFIELD TONY A CLARK DON HOWELL DAVE SCHUNKE RANDY LOBB JOE CUSICK WAYNE HART LYNN ANDERSON BEV BARKER GENE FADNESS WORKING FILE WELDON STUTZMAN JULY 29, 2002 CASE NO. QCC-02- APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR QWEST COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION On April 24, 2002, Qwest Communications Corporation (QCC) filed an Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to provide basic local exchange service within the State of Idaho. QCC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Qwest Service Corporation which also owns Qwest Corporation. Qwest Corporation is an incumbent local exchange carrier in Idaho and a Bell Operating Company as defined by the 1996 Telecommunications Act. QCC intends to provide intra and interLATA toll service upon approval from the Federal Communications Commission pursuant to 47 U.c. ~ 271 and ~ 272. Section 272 requires a Bill Operating Company, which includes Qwest Corporation, to provide interLATA services through an affiliate separate from the Bell Operating Company. QCC also intends to provide local exchange service and vertical features to business and residential customers in the service area of Qwest Corporation and Verizon Northwest, Inc. using both its own facilities and resold DECISION MEMORANDUM service or unbundled network elements. QCC's local telecommunication services would be subject to the Commission s jurisdiction pursuant to Title 62, Idaho Code. On June 10, 2002, the Commission issued a Notice of Application and Notice of Modified Procedure to process QCC's Application. During the comment period, written comments were filed only by the Commission Staff.Staff determined that QCC met the Commission s requirements for approval of a CPCN, but raised concerns regarding two issues. Staff is concerned that customers may not understand the distinction between the regulated basic local service provided by Qwest Corporation and the relatively unregulated basic local service provided by QCC if those services are marketed by the same entity. In reply comments, QCC asserts joint marketing by QCC and Qwest Corporation is expressly permitted by Section 272 of the Telecommunications Act. Section 272 states that "the joint marketing and sale of services permitted under this subsection shall not be considered to violate the nondiscrimination provisions of subsection (c). This language does not limit the authority of the Commission to impose conditions on the marketing of telecommunications services by companies under the jurisdiction of the Commission. The Commission has received hundreds of complaints regarding Qwest's joint marketing and billing of wireless and DSL services. These complaints indicate that Qwest has not adequately clarified to customers the relationship between Qwest Corporation and other Qwest entities for which Qwest Corporation is conducting joint marketing and billing. The potential for confusion is even greater when the products are essentially identical, as they are between QCC and Qwest Corporation. Staff recommends that the order approving the application of QCC to provide basic local exchange service instruct the Company to inform customers about the distinction between products offered by Qwest Corporation and QCc. Staff also expressed concerns about the financial capability of QCC, given the current financial problems ofthe parent company, Qwest Communications. In a related matter, Staff noted that QCC submitted an Application to withdraw the CPCN the Commission previously issued to LCI International Telecom Corp. (LCI). LCI longer exists, and Staff recommends the Commission approve the withdrawal of the CPCN issued to LCI. DECISION MEMORANDUM Staff recommends the Commission issue an order approving the Application of QCC for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to provide basic local exchange service within the State ofIdaho. Commission Decision Should the Commission approve the Application of QCC for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to provide basic local telecommunication service in the state Idaho? Weldon Stutzman vldIM:QCCTO201 DECISION MEMORANDUM