HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061124Staff to CAPAI 1-11.pdfDONALD L. HOWELL, II
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
PO BOX 83720
BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074
(208) 334-0312
IDAHO BAR NO. 3366
RECEiVED
2006 NaV 22 PM 2: 06
IDAHO PUULiC
UTILITIES COMj"4ISSIOi'
Street Address for Express Mail:
472 W. WASHINGTON
BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983
Attorney for the Commission Staff
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF
PACIFICORP DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE
FUNDING STRUCTURE OF ITS SCHEDULE 21
(LOW INCOME WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM).
CASE NO. PAC-06-
FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF TO THE
COMMUNITY ACTION
PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION
OF IDAHO (CAP AI)
The Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its attorney of record
Donald L. Howell, II, Deputy Attorney General, requests that the Community Action Partnership
Association of Idaho (CAPAI) provide the following documents and information as soon as
possible, but no later than THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7,2006.
This Production Request is to be considered as continuing, and CAP AI is requested
provide, by way of supplementary responses, additional documents that it or any person acting
on its behalf may later obtain that will augment the documents produced.
For each item, please indicate the name of the person(s) preparing the answers, along
with the job title of such person(s) and the witness who can sponsor the answer at hearing.
PRODUCTION REQUEST TO CAP AI NOVEMBER 22, 2006
REQUEST NO.1: Please identify the average total weatherization investment per
residence in the Rocky Mountain Power service area for calendar year 2005 and the most recent
data available for 2006. Please break this down as follows:
Average Investment per residence - Calendar Year 2005
Single Family!
Elec. Heat Non-Elec
Multi-familyElec Non Elec
Rocky Mountain Funds
Federal Funds
Other Funds
Total Investment
Average Investment per residence - Calendar Year 2006 to date
Single Family!
Elec. Heat Non-Elec
Multi-familyElec Non Elec
Rocky Mountain Funds
Federal Funds
Other Funds
Total Investment
REQUEST NO.2: Please identify the number of low income units in the area served by
Rocky Mountain Power that were weatherized in calendar year 2005 and also for the most
recently available information for 2006 (Please use the same time period for all responses
requesting information for 2006). Please break this information down by single and multi-family
as well as by electrically heated and non-electrically heated.
REQUEST NO.3: Please identify the total average energy savings estimated from all
DOE-approved measures per unit weatherized in the area served by Rocky Mountain Power that
were weatherized in calendar year 2005 and also for the most recently available information for
2006 (Please use the same time period for all responses requesting information for 2006). Please
break this information down by single and multi-family as well as by electrically heated and non-
electrically heated.
PRODUCTION REQUEST TO CAP AI NOVEMBER 22 , 2006
REQUEST NO.4: Please identify the total average energy savings estimated from all
measures eligible for Rocky Mountain funding per unit weatherized in the area served by Rocky
Mountain Power that were weatherized in calendar year 2005 and also for the most recently
available information for 2006 (Please use the same time period for all responses requesting
information for 2006.) Please break this information down by single and multi-family units.
REQUEST NO.5: How many electrically heated units were not weatherized
specifically due to the limitation that Rocky Mountain will only fund 50% of the installed cost of
eligible energy conservation measures approved in its Schedule 21.
REQUEST NO.6: How many electrically heated homes were weatherized but not all
eligible energy conservation measures were installed due to the 50% matching requirement.
REQUEST NO.7: Please provide any examples of any electricity saving measures not
installed due to the 50% matching requirement.
REQUEST NO.8: How many electrically heated units were not weatherized
specifically due to the limitation that Rocky Mountain will only fund eligible energy
conservation measures approved in its Schedule 21.
REQUEST NO.9: How many electrically heated homes were weatherized but not all
DOE approved eligible energy conservation measures were installed due to the difference
between DOE and Rocky Mountain as to the list of measures eligible for funding.
REQUEST NO. 10: Please provide any examples of any electricity saving measures not
installed due to the difference between DOE and Rocky Mountain as to the list of measures
eligible for funding.
REQUEST NO. 11: Please provide copies of the most recently enacted agency contracts
with Rocky Mountain Power for the low income weatherization programs in Idaho.
PRODUCTION REQUEST TO CAP AI NOVEMBER 22, 2006
DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 22 day of November 2006.
Donald L. Ho ell, II
Deputy Attorney General
Technical Staff: Wayne Hart
Chris Hecht
i:umisc:prodreq/paceO6.10dhwhchechtpr 1 toCAPAI
PRODUCTION REQUEST TO CAP AI NOVEMBER 22, 2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2006
SERVED THE FOREGOING FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION
STAFF TO CAPAI IN CASE NO. PAC-06-, BY E-MAILING A COpy THEREOF
TO THE FOLLOWING:
DEAN BROCKBANK
ACIFICORP
DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
201 S MAIN ST STE 2200
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
BRIAN DICKMAN
P ACIFICORP
DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
201 S MAIN ST STE 2300
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
DATA REQUEST RESPONSE CENTER
ACIFICORP
825 NE MUL TNOMAH STE 800
PORTLAND OR 97232
BRAD M PURDY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2019 N 17TH ST
BOISE ID 83702
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE