Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061124Staff to CAPAI 1-11.pdfDONALD L. HOWELL, II DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 (208) 334-0312 IDAHO BAR NO. 3366 RECEiVED 2006 NaV 22 PM 2: 06 IDAHO PUULiC UTILITIES COMj"4ISSIOi' Street Address for Express Mail: 472 W. WASHINGTON BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983 Attorney for the Commission Staff BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF PACIFICORP DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE FUNDING STRUCTURE OF ITS SCHEDULE 21 (LOW INCOME WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM). CASE NO. PAC-06- FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO THE COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO (CAP AI) The Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its attorney of record Donald L. Howell, II, Deputy Attorney General, requests that the Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho (CAPAI) provide the following documents and information as soon as possible, but no later than THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7,2006. This Production Request is to be considered as continuing, and CAP AI is requested provide, by way of supplementary responses, additional documents that it or any person acting on its behalf may later obtain that will augment the documents produced. For each item, please indicate the name of the person(s) preparing the answers, along with the job title of such person(s) and the witness who can sponsor the answer at hearing. PRODUCTION REQUEST TO CAP AI NOVEMBER 22, 2006 REQUEST NO.1: Please identify the average total weatherization investment per residence in the Rocky Mountain Power service area for calendar year 2005 and the most recent data available for 2006. Please break this down as follows: Average Investment per residence - Calendar Year 2005 Single Family! Elec. Heat Non-Elec Multi-familyElec Non Elec Rocky Mountain Funds Federal Funds Other Funds Total Investment Average Investment per residence - Calendar Year 2006 to date Single Family! Elec. Heat Non-Elec Multi-familyElec Non Elec Rocky Mountain Funds Federal Funds Other Funds Total Investment REQUEST NO.2: Please identify the number of low income units in the area served by Rocky Mountain Power that were weatherized in calendar year 2005 and also for the most recently available information for 2006 (Please use the same time period for all responses requesting information for 2006). Please break this information down by single and multi-family as well as by electrically heated and non-electrically heated. REQUEST NO.3: Please identify the total average energy savings estimated from all DOE-approved measures per unit weatherized in the area served by Rocky Mountain Power that were weatherized in calendar year 2005 and also for the most recently available information for 2006 (Please use the same time period for all responses requesting information for 2006). Please break this information down by single and multi-family as well as by electrically heated and non- electrically heated. PRODUCTION REQUEST TO CAP AI NOVEMBER 22 , 2006 REQUEST NO.4: Please identify the total average energy savings estimated from all measures eligible for Rocky Mountain funding per unit weatherized in the area served by Rocky Mountain Power that were weatherized in calendar year 2005 and also for the most recently available information for 2006 (Please use the same time period for all responses requesting information for 2006.) Please break this information down by single and multi-family units. REQUEST NO.5: How many electrically heated units were not weatherized specifically due to the limitation that Rocky Mountain will only fund 50% of the installed cost of eligible energy conservation measures approved in its Schedule 21. REQUEST NO.6: How many electrically heated homes were weatherized but not all eligible energy conservation measures were installed due to the 50% matching requirement. REQUEST NO.7: Please provide any examples of any electricity saving measures not installed due to the 50% matching requirement. REQUEST NO.8: How many electrically heated units were not weatherized specifically due to the limitation that Rocky Mountain will only fund eligible energy conservation measures approved in its Schedule 21. REQUEST NO.9: How many electrically heated homes were weatherized but not all DOE approved eligible energy conservation measures were installed due to the difference between DOE and Rocky Mountain as to the list of measures eligible for funding. REQUEST NO. 10: Please provide any examples of any electricity saving measures not installed due to the difference between DOE and Rocky Mountain as to the list of measures eligible for funding. REQUEST NO. 11: Please provide copies of the most recently enacted agency contracts with Rocky Mountain Power for the low income weatherization programs in Idaho. PRODUCTION REQUEST TO CAP AI NOVEMBER 22, 2006 DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 22 day of November 2006. Donald L. Ho ell, II Deputy Attorney General Technical Staff: Wayne Hart Chris Hecht i:umisc:prodreq/paceO6.10dhwhchechtpr 1 toCAPAI PRODUCTION REQUEST TO CAP AI NOVEMBER 22, 2006 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2006 SERVED THE FOREGOING FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO CAPAI IN CASE NO. PAC-06-, BY E-MAILING A COpy THEREOF TO THE FOLLOWING: DEAN BROCKBANK ACIFICORP DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 201 S MAIN ST STE 2200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BRIAN DICKMAN P ACIFICORP DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 201 S MAIN ST STE 2300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 DATA REQUEST RESPONSE CENTER ACIFICORP 825 NE MUL TNOMAH STE 800 PORTLAND OR 97232 BRAD M PURDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 2019 N 17TH ST BOISE ID 83702 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE