HomeMy WebLinkAbout200504224th staff production request to PAC.pdf--
r...
,... " ''!.
l- '-' '- '~L f"lL:.Ji
1""'"""
----i,SCOTT WOODBURY
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
472 WEST WASHINGTON STREET
PO BOX 83720
BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074
(208) 334-0320
BAR NO. 1895
:-
iI. EO
::005 ilPR 22 Prt 2:1 I
'" " ' '" ..,.., ""
"'" U i U;,Jl,.I\..'
fONu 1 LI I t CUt'
:,). " '
Street Address for Express Mail:
472 W. WASHINGTON
BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983
Attorney for the Commission Staff
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF
ACIFICORP DBA UTAH POWER & LIGHT
COMP ANY FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE
ITS RATES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO
ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS IN THE STATE OF IDAHO.
CASE NO. PAC-05-
FOURTH PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF TO
ACIFICORP
The Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its attorney of record
Scott Woodbury, Deputy Attorney General, requests that PacifiCorp (PacifiCorp; Company)
provide the following documents and infonnation on or before FRIDAY, MAY 6, 2005.
This Production Request is to be considered as continuing, and PacifiCorp is requested to
provide, by way of supplementary responses, additional documents that it or any person acting
on its behalf may later obtain that will augment the documents produced.
Please provide answers to each question; supporting workpapers that provide detail or are
the source of infonnation used in calculations; the name and telephone number of the person
preparing the documents; and the name, location and telephone number of the record holder.
FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
ACIFICORP APRIL 22, 2005
For each item, please indicate the name of the person(s) preparing the answers, along
with the job title of such person(s) and the witness who can sponsor the answer at hearing.
Reference IDAP A 31.01.01.228. For documents provided please include the name and phone
number of the person preparing the document, and the name, location and phone number of the
record holder.
For all responses to the following requests, please provide all workpapers, diskettes
(3.5 in.), CDs with all underlying formulas intact in Excel 2000 compatible language.
REQUEST NO. 50: In PacifiCorp s response to Staff Production Request No. 47 , it is
confinned that meters are typically left on between occupants unless at the next meter
reading/billing date there is no new occupant and usage has crossed the threshold of 400 kWh.
PacifiCorp has stated that at that point, the meter is disconnected. Who is billed for the
electricity between the time that the meter is read for the occupant who closed the account and
the point at which the meter is disconnected after crossing the 400 kWh threshold?
REQUEST NO. 51: During 2004, how many meters fall in this category where the
occupant has closed the account but the meter is not disconnected?
REQUEST NO. 52: Chronologically, what is the process after the 400 kWh threshold is
detennined to have been crossed? Does the meter reader turn the meter off? Is a separate order
generated and a different employee dispatched to turn off the meter?
REQUEST NO. 53: How is unbilled revenue booked?
REQUEST NO. 54: During 2004, how many meters were disconnected after crossing
the 400 kWh threshold?
REQUEST NO. 55: Please provide a current valuation of the three ancillary services
that Monsanto provides to PacifiCorp. Show them individually and provide associated
workpapers.
FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
ACIFICORP APRIL 22 , 2005
REQUEST NO. 56: In Case No. UPL-01-16 the Commission established Monsanto
contract rates at what it deemed to be full cost of service. In that case Monsanto s full cost of
service as an uninterrupted customer was calculated to be $43 971 090 based on a 1999 test year.
In the current case, the Company calculates Monsanto s full cost of service to be $53 885 831. A
number of things have changed that have led to the cost of service difference. They are:
Test year accounting data was 1999 and now is 2004.
Jurisdictional and class allocators were based on 1999 data and now are
based on 2004 data.
Jurisdictional allocation methodology was "rolled-" and now is "revised
protocol" .
Please provide a series of jurisdictional allocation and cost of service model runs that capture the
differences caused by each of these factors individually. If there are other factors that the
Company believes to be significant in defining the change in cost of service, model runs that
establish their value should also be provided. The model runs that capture the jurisdictional
allocation methodology difference should be run last.
REQUEST NO. 57: Please provide the cost of meter reading and billing for each of the
rate schedules.
REQUEST NO. 58: Please provide any analysis justifYing the proposed increase in the
monthly minimum bill Customer Service Charge for each of the schedules.
REQUEST NO. 59: Please provide the analysis that supports the seasonal price
differential in Schedule No.1. Include justification for the specific months included in each
season and the specific rates as proposed.
REQUEST NO. 60: Please provide an analysis that supports the time of use rate
differentials on Schedule 36. Include justification for the time periods chosen and the specific
rates proposed.
FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
ACIFICORP APRIL 22, 2005
REQUEST NO. 61: Please provide the analysis that supports the seasonal price
differential in Schedule Nos. 6, 6A, 8, 9, 10, 23 and 23A. Include justification for the specific
months included in each season and the specific rates as proposed.
REQUEST NO. 62: Please provide an analysis that supports the time of use rate
differentials on Schedule Nos. 35 and 35A. Include justification for the time periods chosen and
the specific rates proposed.
REQUEST NO. 63: Please provide a bill frequency analysis for Service Schedules
and 36 for each month with incremental blocks of 100 kWh for usage from 0 to 1200 kWh; then
1200 to 1500 kWh; 1500 to 2000 kWh; 2000 to 2500 kWh; 2500 to 3000 kWh; 3000 to 4000
kWh; 4000 to 5000 kWh and over 5000 kWh. Include both numbers of bills in that block and
energy use the block. Please provide this in Excel 2000 fonnat.
Dated at Boise, Idaho, this d~ day of April 2005.
Scott Woodbury
Deputy Attorney General
Technical Staff: Marilyn Parker
Keith Hessing
Dave Schunke
i:umisc:prodreq/pace05.lsw pr 3
mp 50-54 kh 55-56 des 57-
FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUEST TO
ACIFICORP APRIL 22, 2005
CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICE
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2005
SERVED THE FOREGOING FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF TO PACIFICORP IN CASE NO. PAC-05-, BY 'MAILING
A COpy THEREOF POSTAGE PREPAID, TO THE FOLLOWING:
JOHN STEWART
ACIFICORP
201 S MAIN ST., SUITE 2300
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84140
MAIL: john.stewart2~pacificorp.com
JAMES M. VAN NOSTRAND
STOEL RIVES LLP
900 S W FIFTH AVE SUITE 2600
PORTLAND OR 97204
MAIL: imvannostrand~stoe1.com
DATA REQUEST RESPONSE CENTER
ACIFICORP
825 NE MUL TNOMAH SUITE 800
PORTLAND OR 97232
MAIL: datarequest~pacificorp.com
ERIC L OLSEN
RACINE OLSON NYE BUDGE
& BAILEY, CHARTERED
PO BOX 1391
POCATELLO ID 83204-1391
E- MAIL: e1o~racinelaw .net
ANTHONY Y ANKEL
29814 LAKE ROAD
BAY VILLAGE OH 44140
MAIL: tony~yanke1.com
RANDALL C. BUDGE
RACINE OLSON NYE BUDGE
& BAILEY, CHARTERED
PO BOX 1391
POCATELLO ID 83204-1391
MAIL: rcb~racinelaw .net
JAMES R SMITH
MONSANTO COMPANY
PO BOX 816
SODA SPRINGS ID 83276
MAIL: jim.smith~monsanto.conl
CONLEY E WARD
GIVENS PURSLEY LLP
601 W BANNOCK ST
PO BOX 2720
BOISE ID 83701-2720
MAIL: cew~givenspursley.com
DENNIS E PESEAU
UTILITY RESOURCES INC
1500 LIBERTY ST SE
SUITE 250
SALEM OR 97302
MAIL: dpeseau~excite.com
BRAD M. PURDY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2019 N 17TH STREET
BOISE ID 83702
MAIL: bmpurdy~hotmai1.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
R. SCOTT PASLEY
ASSIST ANT GENERAL COUNSEL
J R SIMPLOT COMPANY
999 MAIN ST (83702)
PO BOX 27
BOISE ID 83707
MAIL: spasley~simplot.com
DAVID HAWK, DIRECTOR
ENERGY NATURAL RESOURCES
J R SIMPLOT COMPANY
999 MAIN ST (83702)
PO BOX 27
BOISE ID 83707
MAIL: dhawk~simplot.com
TIM OTHY J SHURTZ
411 SMAIN
FIRTH ID 83236
MAIL: tiln~idahosupreme.com
SECRET ARY
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE