Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230915IPC to Micron 21-24.pdf MEGAN GOICOECHEA ALLEN Corporate Counsel mgoicoecheaallen@idahopower.com September 15, 2023 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Jan Noriyuki, Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg 8, Suite 201-A (83714) PO Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 Re: Case No. IPC-E-23-11 Idaho Power Company’s General Rate Case Dear Ms. Noriyuki: Enclosed for electronic filing, please find Idaho Power Company’s Response to Micron Technology, Inc.’s Third Set of Discovery Requests to Idaho Power Company. Due to the collectively voluminous confidential and non-confidential information provided in response to data requests in this case, the Company is posting the attachments to these requests to the secure FTP site to allow parties to view the requested information remotely unless otherwise noted in the response. Because certain attachments contain confidential information, the FTP site is divided between confidential and non-confidential information. The login information for the non-confidential portion of the FTP site has been provided to all parties that have intervened to date. The login information for the confidential portion of the FTP site has been provided the parties that have executed the Protective Agreement in this matter. If you have any questions about the attached filing, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Megan Goicoechea Allen MGA:sg Enclosures RECEIVED Friday, September 15, 2023 1:44:07 PM IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 1 LISA D. NORDSTROM (ISB No. 5733) DONOVAN E. WALKER (ISB No. 5921) MEGAN GOICOECHEA ALLEN (ISB No. 7623) Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5825 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 lnordstrom@idahopower.com dwalker@idahopower.com mgoicoecheaallen@idahopower.com Attorneys for Idaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE IN THE STATE OF IDAHO AND FOR ASSOCIATED REGULATORY ACCOUNTING TREATMENT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-23-11 IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company (“Idaho Power” or “Company”), and in response to Micron Technology, Inc.’s (“Micron”) Third Set of Discovery Requests dated August 25, 2023, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 2 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 21: Please provide a proof of revenue showing how annual billing units applied to current and proposed rates produce the current and proposed revenues for each class, and the total requested revenue requirement. Please provide the proof of revenue in electronic spreadsheet format with all formulas and links intact. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 21: Please see the attachment provided for this request, Attachment – Response to Micron’s Request No. 21. The response to this Request is sponsored by Paul Goralski, Regulatory Consultant, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 3 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22: Please refer to the Direct Testimony of Pawel P. Goralski at pages 8 and 9. In electronic spreadsheet format, with all formulas and links intact, please provide the following: a. The workpapers used to produce the demand and energy allocation factors by jurisdiction and by tariff rate class used in the Company’s filing in this case, in electronic spreadsheet format with all formula intact, including all supporting schedules and/or workbooks. b. The system (retail and total company) peak demands for each month of the test year. c. The monthly retail coincident peak demands for the system and by each customer class for the test year. d. The calculation of Idaho Power Company’s 12 coincident peak (“12CP”) demands by customer class used to allocate demand-related base-load generation plant costs in the CCOSS. e. The calculation of Idaho Power Company’s four coincident peak (“4CP”) demands by customer class used to allocate peak-load serving generation capacity costs in the CCOSS. f. The calculation of Idaho Power Company’s 12 CP demands by customer class used to allocate transmission capacity costs in the CCOSS. g. The calculation of Idaho Power Company’s energy-related cost allocators inclusive of marginal-cost weighting. h. The three-year load duration curve used to classify distribution plant between demand and customer. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 4 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22: a.-g. Please see previously provided Confidential Attachment 6 to Supplemental Response to Staff’s Request No. 75, Goralski Exhibit No. 44, and Goralski Exhibit No. 45. h. Please see the attachment provided for this request, Attachment – Response to Micron’s Request No. 22. The response to this Request is sponsored by Paul Goralski, Regulatory Consultant, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 5 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 23: Please refer to Mr. Goralski’s Direct Testimony at page 11, lines 6-8. a. Please indicate whether Account 555.0 Purchased Power Agreements are used to meet the Company’s production resource adequacy requirements or planning reserve requirements. If affirmative: i. Please identify the capacity provided by the PPA and describe how the capacity is reflected in the PPA price. ii. Please identify the annual PPA capacity commitment and energy commitment, by year over the contract agreement. iii. If the response to part a. is affirmative, please explain why Idaho Power Company proposes to allocate the capacity-related benefits of the PPA on an energy basis. b. Please indicate whether Account 555.1 – PURPA provides production capacity that the Company relies on to meet its production resource adequacy or planning reserve requirement. If the response is affirmative: i. Please identify the amount of qualifying capacity. ii. Please identify the annual qualifying capacity and energy entitlement under the PPA. iii. Please explain why Idaho Power Company proposes to allocate the capacity-related benefits of the PURPA resource on an energy basis. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 23: a. Idaho Power has Power Purchase Agreements (“PPAs”) or Energy Sales Agreements (“ESAs”) with several different resource types. These PPAs and ESAs IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 6 are assumed to count toward the Company’s production resource adequacy requirements and planning reserve requirements. In resource planning, the methodology by which the projects are assigned capacity contribution depends on the resource type, not on the agreement type (i.e., PURPA or non-PURPA). For PPAs or ESAs of various resources (wind, solar, run of river hydro, thermal, biomass, etc.), Idaho Power currently assumes the resource provides capacity based on a total calculated Effective Load Carrying Capability (“ELCC”). Idaho Power resource planning does not assign a particular ELCC value to each PPA or ESA resource, but instead utilizes historical hourly data in its internally developed Reliability and Capacity Assessment Tool (“RCAT”) to account for the capacity contribution of those resource types to system reliability. For example, wind projects are combined to determine a total wind contribution, independent of whether a project is in Account 555.0 or Account 555.1. Idaho Power provides the capacity contribution by resource type in the biannually published Integrated Resource Plan (“IRP”); the ELCC values of existing and future resources as published in the 2021 IRP are provided below for informational purposes. However, the PPAs and ESAs do not identify a capacity value the project is required to provide. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 7 ELCC of Existing Resources ELCC of Future Resources  Resource Average Resource Average  PURPA Solar 62.3% Solar PV  10.2%  Oregon Solar 62.3% Jackpot Solar 34.0%  PURPA Wind 15.0% Wind 11.2%  Elkhorn Wind 15.0% 4‐Hour Storage 87.5%  Current Demand Response 17.3% 8‐Hour Storage 97.0%    Solar PV + 4‐Hour Storage 97.0%    Proposed Demand Response 58.5%    Incremental Demand Response 36.0%  i. Capacity provided by a PPA is not tracked by project. The Company highlights the difference between the cost of PPAs versus how they impact resource adequacy and planning reserve requirements. Specifically, PPA cost is negotiated for a fully bundled product Idaho Power receives, which may include capacity value, energy value, and environmental attributes, among others. The “value layers” of a PPA are not individual components which are enumerated and combined into a final PPA rate. ii. Individual PPA capacity commitment is not tracked over the contract agreement. The energy entitlement under the PPA is provided in a monthly forecast. iii. As noted in response to part a(i), capacity is not tracked by project, and each PPA price is negotiated as a bundled product with a single price which is identified in the PPA and paid to the project as compensation based on variable output of the project. The price is paid to the project based on actual generation, which is variable and not dispatchable. For these reasons and the reasons described above regarding how the project’s capacity is IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 8 counted in resource planning, allocation on an energy basis is appropriate. b. Please see the response to part a. For PURPA resources, Idaho Power includes below a portion of the response provided to the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power Request No. 9(2): Prior classification of purchased power in the Company’s 2011 general rate case, including PURPA energy and capacity cost did not classify costs in a manner matching the respective component of PURPA payment, that is PURPA capacity costs were not classified as 100 percent demand-related, nor were PURPA energy costs classified as 100 percent energy-related, instead they followed classification of production plant. Further, the capacity-related expense listed in the 2011 general rate case test year, $2,815,214 out of $86,772,920 of account 555.1 Cogeneration & Small Power Production cost, represented capacity payments for contracts which had a levelized capacity payment independent of energy generation for generators such as hydro and biomass, and were contracts executed in the 1980s which utilized a different Commission-approved methodology for capacity payment structure. As contracts have expired since the 2011 general rate case, upon their renewal all contracts were transitioned to current, Commission-approved methodology to include the capacity payment on a combined basis with the energy rate and are expressed on single, dollars per megawatt-hour values differentiated between heavy-load and light-load hours, which is the single contract cost value for any specific hour entered into the Company’s accounting system. The last year Idaho Power recorded separate capacity payments was 2019. Payments made for PURPA contracts for both energy and capacity are variable based on the variable output of the project, thus the Company has classified all PURPA expense as 100 percent energy related. i. The qualifying capacity of an ESA project is not tracked. ii. Please see the response to part a(ii). iii. Please see the response to part a(iii). Prices in ESAs are determined either under the avoided cost methodologies approved by the Commission, and IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 9 the prices identified in the ESAs, and as described in part a(iii), the compensation to the project is based on the prices as applied to the variable output of the project. The response to this Request is sponsored by Jared Ellsworth, Transmission, Distribution, and Resource Planning Director and Paul Goralski, Regulatory Consultant, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 10 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 24: Regarding the Company’s proposal to transfer Demand-Side Management (“DSM”) labor-related cost collection from the Energy Efficiency Rider into base rates, please respond to the following: a. Please identify the amount of DSM labor-related cost being transferred to base rates. b. Please explain how the DSM labor-related cost is currently allocated across customer classes for collection through the Energy Efficiency Rider. c. Please explain how the DSM labor-related cost will be allocated to customer classes once it is rolled into base rates. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 24: a. $3,474,5551 b. All energy efficiency-related costs recovered through the Energy Efficiency Rider are collected from customers at the percentage identified in Schedule 91 – Energy Efficiency Rider, multiplied by the customer’s monthly billed charges for the base rate components. c. The $3.5 million in DSM labor-related expense transferred into base rates is recorded in FERC account 908, Customer Assistance, which is allocated to customer classes based on customer count. The response to this Request is sponsored by Paul Goralski, Regulatory Consultant, Idaho Power Company. 1 Noe Exhibit No. 34; Noe Exhibit No. 35; Goralski Exhibit No. 41. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 11 DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 15th day of September 2023. MEGAN GOICOECHEA ALLEN Attorney for Idaho Power Company LISA D. NORDSTROM Attorney for Idaho Power Company DONOVAN E. WALKER Attorney for Idaho Power Company IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 15th day of September 2023, I served a true and correct copy of Idaho Power Company’s Response to Micron Technology, Inc.’s Third Set of Discovery Requests to Idaho Power Company upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Dayn Hardie Chris Burdin Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg No. 8 Suite 201-A (83714) PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0074 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email Dayn.Hardie@puc.idaho.gov Chris.Burdin@puc.idaho.gov Clean Energy Opportunities for Idaho Kelsey Jae Law for Conscious Leadership 920 N. Clover Dr. Boise, ID 83703 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email Kelsey@kelseyjae.com Courtney White Mike Heckler Clean Energy Opportunities for Idaho 3778 Plantation River Drive, Suite 102 Boise, ID 83703 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email courtney@cleanenergyopportunities.com mike@cleanenergyopportunities.com Industrial Customers of Idaho Power Peter J. Richardson Richardson Adams, PLLC 515 N. 27th Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email peter@richardsonadams.com IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 13 Dr. Don Reading 280 Silverwood Way Eagle, Idaho 83616 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email dreading@mindspring.com Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Association, Inc. Eric L. Olsen ECHO HAWK & OLSEN, PLLC 505 Pershing Avenue, Suite 100 P.O. Box 6119 Pocatello, Idaho 83205 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email elo@echohawk.com Lance Kaufman, Ph.D. 2623 NW Bluebell Place Corvallis, OR 97330 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email lance@aegisinsight.com Micron Technology, Inc. Austin Rueschhoff Thorvald A. Nelson Austin W. Jensen Holland & Hart, LLP 555 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3200 Denver, Colorado 80202 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email darueschhoff@hollandhart.com tnelson@hollandhart.com awjensen@hollandhart.com aclee@hollandhart.com clmoser@hollandhart.com Jim Swier Micron Technology, Inc. 8000 South Federal Way Boise, Idaho 83707 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email jswier@micron.com IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 14 City of Boise Ed Jewell Darrell Early Boise City Attorney’s Office 150 N. Capitol Blvd. Boise, ID 83701 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email ejewell@cityofboise.org dearly@cityofboise.org boca@cityofboise.org Wil Gehl Boise City Dept. of Public Works 150 N. Capitol Blvd. P.O. Box 500 Boise, Idaho 83701-0500 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email wgehl@cityofboise.org Idaho Conservation League Marie Callaway Kellner Idaho Conservation League 710 N. 6th Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email mkellner@idahoconservation.org Brad Heusinkveld Idaho Conservation League 710 N. 6th Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email bheusinkveld@idahoconservation.org IdaHydro C. Tom Arkoosh Arkoosh Law Offices 913 W. River Street, Suite 450 P.O. Box 2900 Boise, Idaho 83701 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email tom.arkoosh@arkoosh.com erin.cecil@arkoosh.com Federal Executive Agencies Peter Meier Paige Anderson Tanner Crowther U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washin ton, DC 20585 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email peter.meier@hq.doe.gov IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S THIRD SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 15 Dwight Etheridge Exeter Associates 5565 Sterrett Place, Suite 310 Columbia, MD 21044 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email detheridge@exeterassociates.com NW Energy Coalition F. Diego Rivas 1101 8th Ave Helena, MT 59601 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email diego@nwenergy.org Walmart Inc. Norman M. Semanko Parsons Behle & Latimer 800 West Main Street, Suite 1300 Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email NSemanko@parsonsbehle.com Steve W. Chriss Director, Energy Services Walmart Inc. 2608 Southeast J Street Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email Stephen.Chriss@walmart.com Walmart Inc. Justina A. Caviglia Parsons Behle & Latimer 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 750 Reno, NV 89502 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email jcaviglia@parsonsbehle.com Stacy Gust Regulatory Administrative Assistant