Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230804IPC to ICIP 10-21.pdf MEGAN GOICOECHEA ALLEN Corporate Counsel mgoicoecheaallen@idahopower.com August 4, 2023 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Jan Noriyuki, Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg 8, Suite 201-A (83714) PO Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 Re: Case No. IPC-E-23-11 Idaho Power Company’s General Rate Case Dear Ms. Noriyuki: Enclosed for electronic filing, please find Idaho Power Company’s Response to the Second Production Request of the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power to Idaho Power Company. Due to the collectively voluminous confidential and non-confidential information provided in response to data requests in this case, the Company is posting the confidential attachments to these requests to the secure FTP site to allow parties to view the requested information remotely unless otherwise noted in the response. The login information for the confidential portion of the FTP site has been provided the parties that have executed the Protective Agreement in this matter. If you have any questions about the attached filing, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Megan Goicoechea Allen MGA:sg Enclosures RECEIVED 2023 AUGUST 4, 2023 4:37PM IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 1 LISA D. NORDSTROM (ISB No. 5733) DONOVAN E. WALKER (ISB No. 5921) MEGAN GOICOECHEA ALLEN (ISB No. 7623) Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5825 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 lnordstrom@idahopower.com dwalker@idahopower.com mgoicoecheaallen@idahopower.com Attorneys for Idaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE IN THE STATE OF IDAHO AND FOR ASSOCIATED REGULATORY ACCOUNTING TREATMENT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-23-11 IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company (“Idaho Power” or “Company”), and in response to the Second Production Request of the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power (“ICIP”) dated July 14, 2023, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 2 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10: At page 7 of her testimony, Ms. Grow references "our [Idaho Power's] seven peer utilities." Please provide the written criteria and documentation used to select the seven listed utilities as Idaho Power's "peer utilities." Please also explain in narrative form the rationale for selecting the listed utilities as Idaho Power's "peer utilities." RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10: The Company did not establish written criteria when selecting the seven peer utilities. These seven utilities were chosen as peer utilities because they are investor- owned utilities of similar size and geographically close to or adjacent to Idaho Power. The response to this Request is sponsored by Mitch Colburn, Vice President of Engineering, Planning and Construction, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 3 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11: At page 16 of her testimony, Ms. Grow observes that, "Since the Company's last general rate case the Company has shared $126,752,809 of earnings with its customers under the ADITC/Revenue Sharing Mechanism." Please identify the dollar amount of the shared earnings that were used to fund the Company's pension or retirement plans. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11: As discussed in the Direct Testimony of Company witness Matthew T. Larkin [at 6-7], pursuant to Order Nos. 30978 and 32424 the pension balancing account was reduced by $68,148,692, as earnings above a 10.5 percent return on equity were used to offset future rate increases associated with pension deferrals. The response to this Request is sponsored by Matthew Larkin, Revenue Requirement Senior Manager, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 4 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12: At page 23 of her testimony Ms. Grow presents Figure No. 6 showing "Net Electric Plant in Service." That Figure has superimposed a line representing the Company's annual depreciation expense. The two data points present a relatively smooth and steady increase over the decade with one exception. In the 2021 - 2022 year the annual depreciation expense line takes a sharp out-of-trend jump relative to the trend line for plant in service. Please explain the reason for this disparate increase in annual depreciation expense relative to net plant in service. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12: The 2022 depreciation expense reflected in Figure No. 6 of Ms. Grow’s testimony does not reflect any accounting adjustments made to accelerated depreciation expense for Bridger coal-related assets resulting from Commission Order No. 35423. The response to this Request is sponsored by Paula Jeppsen, Forecasting and Planning Director, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 5 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 13: Ms. Grow comments on a "recent downgrade by Moody's" at page 28 of her testimony. Please provide copies of all communications between the Company and Moody’s for the time period beginning January 1, 2022 through today. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 13: Communications related to the July 26, 2022, credit rating downgrade of Idaho Power Company by Moody’s Investor Services that were not conducted telephonically consisted of the publication of a credit opinion by Moody’s Investor Services. This credit opinion is attached to this response as “CONFIDENTIAL Attachment 1 - ICIP DR No. 13 - Credit Opinion - Idaho-Power-Company - 26Jul22.” In addition, the Company has made presentations and provided the following CONFIDENTIAL materials to Moody’s. The requested information is highly confidential. It will be made available to ICIP at Idaho Power's corporate headquarters. Please contact Tami White at (208) 388-6938 or David Fewkes at (208) 388-2628 to arrange a time to review the requested material. No. Description CONFIDENTIAL ATTACHMENT 2 Financial forecast dated March 25, 2022 2022-2026 IPCo Published BB FF 3-25- 22.xlsx 3 Financial forecast narrative dated March 25, 2022 2022-2024 IDA LTF Published Memo BB- Rating Agency Final.docx 4 Financial forecast dated June 2023 2023-2027 IPC Published BB FF Rating Agency.xlsx 5 Financial forecast narrative dated June 2023 2023-2027 IDA LTF Published Memo BB-Rating Agency.docx 6 Presentation dated April 12, 2022 2022 Moody’s Presentation Deck.pdf 7 Email correspondence re: Moody’s walk forward report Moody's 8-24-22 email.pdf 8 Moody’s walk forward report Walk-Forward Report for IDACORP, Inc Annual 2021.xlsm 9 Email dated 6-13-2023 with presentation dated 6-20-2023 Moody's 2023 presentation.pdf IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 6 The response to this Request is sponsored by Brian Buckham, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Idaho Power Company. . IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 7 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14: Also on page 28 Ms. Grow references a “recent note from Standard and Poor's ("S&P") downgrading its liquidity assessment of the Company." Please provide copies of all communications between the Company and Standard and Poor's for the time period beginning January 1,2022 through today. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14: Communications related to the February 7, 2023, downgrade of Idaho Power Company’s liquidity assessment by S&P Global Ratings that were not conducted telephonically consisted of the publication of a research update by S&P Global Ratings. This update is attached to this response as CONFIDENTIAL Attachment 1 – Response to ICIP DR No. 14 - RatingsDirect.pdf. In addition, the Company has provided and presented the following CONFIDENTIAL materials to S&P. The requested information is highly confidential. It will be made available to ICIP at Idaho Power's corporate headquarters. Please contact Tami White at (208) 388-6938 or David Fewkes at (208) 388-2628 to arrange a time to review the requested material. No. DESCRIPTION CONFIDENTIAL ATTACHMENT 2 Financial forecast dated March 25, 2022 2022-2026 IPCo Published BB FF 3- 25-22.xlsx 3 Financial forecast narrative dated March 25, 2022 2022-2024 IDA LTF Published Memo BB-Rating Agency Final.docx 4 Financial forecast dated June 2023 2023-2027 IPC Published BB FF Rating Agency.xlsx 5 Financial forecast narrative dated June 2023 2023-2027 IDA LTF Published Memo BB-Rating Agency.docx 6 Presentation dated April 13, 2022 2022 S&P Presentation Deck.pdf 7 Email dated June 14, 2023, re draft of S&P publication FW_ SPGCONFIDENTIAL – Pre- Publication Draft - Idaho Power 8 Attachment to email dated June 14, 2023 Pre-Publication Draft - Idaho Power - 13 June 2023 comments.pdf IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 8 9 Email dated June 13, 2023, with attached June 22, 2023, presentation 2023 S&P presentation deck.pdf The response to this Request is sponsored by Brian Buckham, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 9 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 15: Please provide the current Moody's rating and the current Standard and Poor's liquidity assessment for each of the seven peer utilities Ms. Grow identified on page 7 of her testimony. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 15: The Company does not collect and keep current such information from this specific peer group, which is being used to compare system reliability measures, not liquidity or credit measures. Further, the Company does not subscribe to Moody’s Investor Services credit ratings services and does not have the reports available to provide for this peer utility group. Current information may be available directly from Moody’s as part of a paid subscription or publicly as companies typically provide such information in annual reports, other Securities and Exchange Commission filings, or on their corporate websites. Similarly, in the case of Standard and Poor’s, credit ratings and the inclusion of liquidity assessments within those credit ratings, are available for public consumption directly from S&P Global Ratings, as part of a paid subscription. CONFIDENTIAL Attachment 1 to ICIP Request No. 13, page 10, provides Moody’s ratings for Avista Corporation, NorthWestern Corporation, Portland General Electric and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. as of July 26, 2022. Also, workpaper file “McKenzie Idaho Power Exhibit File.xlsm” on tab “Proxy Group Risk Measures” available on the Company’s FTP site includes the March 28, 2023, S&P corporate rating of the Company’s ROE peer group, which includes Avista Corporation, NorthWestern Corporation, and Portland General Electric. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 10 The response to this Request is sponsored by Brian Buckham, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 11 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16: At page 29 of her direct testimony Ms. Grow reports that, "immediately following the last GRC [General Rate Case]" the company began increasing its equity ratio to achieve a 55 percent equity ratio as recently as year end 2022. Please identify the equity ratio the Commission approved in the Company's last GRC. Please provide copies of all communications between the Company and the Commission since its last GRC addressing the Company's equity ratio. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16: Commission Order No. 32426 in Case No. IPC-E-11-08, the Company’s last GRC, approved a Settlement Stipulation entered into by the Company, Commission Staff and several intervenors. The specific rate of return components such as an equity ratio are not identified in either the Order or the Settlement Stipulation. Since its last GRC, the Company has not had any communications with the Commission addressing its equity ratio. The response to this Request is sponsored by Matt Larkin, Revenue Requirement Senior Manager, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 17: Please provide the current equity ratio for each of the seven peer utilities Ms. Grow identified on page 7 of her testimony. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 17: The Company does not collect such information from this specific peer group, which is being used to compare system reliability measures, not capitalization structure. The current equity ratio of each of the peer utility companies identified are available within each of those entities’ Annual Reports on Form 10-K and/or their FERC Form 1 reports, as applicable. In order to ensure the most accurate and current equity ratios, the Company encourages parties to view them in the utilities’ most recent reports, which are available online or by direct request from those utilities. Also, note that, Exhibit No. 10 to the direct testimony of Adrien McKenzie presents the December 31, 2022, capital structure of the Company’s ROE peer group, which includes Avista Corporation, NorthWestern Corporation, and Portland General Electric. The response to this Request is sponsored by Brian Buckham, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 13 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18: At page 32 of her testimony Ms. Grow is asked to identify the options available to customers to "help them manage their energy costs." Has the Company conducted any analyses or studies as to whether the adoption of its proposed Residential Price Modernization plan will have any impact on its customers' ability to manage their energy costs? If so, please provide copies of all such analyses, studies and supporting workpapers. Has the company conducted any analyses or studies as to the ability of its customers to manage their energy usage if the proposed Residential Price Modernization Plan is adopted? If so please provide copies of all such analyses, studies and supporting workpapers. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18: No, the Company has not conducted any analyses or studies specific to the impact of the Residential Price Modernization Plan’s impact on customers’ ability to manage their energy costs. The options described on page 32 of Ms. Grow’s testimony would continue to be available to customers. As described starting on page 22 of Mr. Anderson’s testimony, the Company did conduct a bill impact analysis associated with the Residential Price Modernization Plan, which has been provided as Exhibit No. 54 to the Direct Testimony of Grant Anderson. The response to this Request is sponsored by Connie G. Aschenbrenner, Rate Design Senior Manager, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 14 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19: At page 23 of her testimony Ms. Grow states, "In addition, environmental mandates require the replacement or retrofitting of aging equipment with technology that is often more expensive." For the time period since the conclusion of the company's last general rate case, please identify each "environmental mandated" Ms. Grow is referencing and the associated "equipment" that such mandate requires to be replaced and/or retrofitted. Please quantify the dollar impact of each referenced instance of equipment that has been or is being replaced due to each such "environmental mandate" Ms. Grow is referencing in her testimony. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19: Idaho Power’s activities are subject to a broad range of federal, state, regional, and local laws and regulations designed to protect, restore, and enhance the quality of the environment. Additionally, since the conclusion of the Company’s last rate case Idaho Power has completed over 114,000 capital projects, many of which were at least partly related to environmental requirements. Therefore, it is not possible for Idaho Power to manually sort through each of the approximate 114,000 completed projects to determine their relation to the multitude of environmental regulations to which Idaho Power is subject. A comprehensive list of these projects was provided to parties in the Company’s Response to Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff’s Request No. 35. The above- referenced statement in Ms. Grow’s testimony is generally referring to the fact that environmental regulations have resulted in investment in the Company’s system since the conclusion of its last rate case. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 15 In light of the breadth of completed projects and the extensive and often overlapping nature of environmental regulations, Idaho Power offers the following examples of environmentally-driven investments completed since the conclusion of its last general rate case as generally referenced by Ms. Grow in her testimony:  Selective Catalytic Reduction (“SCR”) systems installed on Units 3 and 4 of the Jim Bridger Power Plant as a result of the Regional Haze Rule implemented by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Idaho Power is currently collecting these amounts in rates, therefore there is no dollar impact included in this application.  Fish ladder construction at the Upper Malad hydro facility as a result of Article 408 of the facility’s federal license. The total amount closed to plant was $11.3 million.  White sturgeon conservation hatchery investment to supplement sturgeon populations in the Middle Snake River in accordance with Article 406 of the Swan Falls hydro facility’s federal license. The total amount closed to plant was $6.0 million. The response to this Request is sponsored by Ryan N. Adelman, Vice President Power Supply, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 16 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 20: Does the Company consider carbon emissions reduction one such environmental mandate that is referenced by Ms. Grow at page 23 of her testimony? RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 20: No. While the Company has set short-term, medium-term, and long-term carbon emission reduction goals for itself, Idaho Power is not currently subject to an environmental mandate to reduce carbon emissions resulting in retrofitting or replacement of equipment. The response to this Request is sponsored by Ryan N. Adelman, Vice President Power Supply, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 17 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 21: Regardless as to whether the Company views carbon emissions reduction as a mandate or not, please identify each of the Company's carbon emissions reduction activities and quantify the dollar amount spent by the Company on each such project. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 21: As stated in the prior response, Idaho Power has set internal short-term, medium- term, and long-term carbon emission reduction goals for itself which are laid out in the Company’s Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) report.1 The ESG report discusses some of the ways Idaho Power is working to reduce carbon intensity. For example, by 2030, Idaho Power projects that 75 percent of its passenger cars and forklifts (including all new purchases) will be electric as will 35 percent of other fleet vehicles under 8,500 pounds. As of December 31, 2022, 55 percent of passenger cars, 32 percent of forklifts and 4 percent of other vehicles under 8,500 pounds in Idaho Power’s fleet are electric. Idaho Power has invested approximately $11 million in capital and maintenance expenses associated with electric vehicles. In addition, the Company’s Integrated Resource Plan (“IRP”) allows the Company to economically evaluate decisions related to its existing resources as well as future resources over a 20-year time horizon. The early exit of coal-fired generation at both the Valmy and Bridger power plants was shown to be cost-effective with the additional benefit of reduced carbon emissions. The 2021 IRP preferred portfolio calls for continued integration of more cost-effective clean resources to ensure Idaho Power can reliably serve its customers. The Company’s most recent resource additions (purchasing energy 1 https://www.idahopower.com/energy-environment/environmental-stewardship/sustainability/ IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 18 from a 120-MW solar plant and utility-scale battery energy storage systems) were the result of a competitive process to select the most cost-effective resource for customers, while at the same time contributing to reduced carbon emissions. The response to this Request is sponsored by Ryan N. Adelman, Vice President Power Supply, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 19 DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 4th day of August 2023. MEGAN GOICOECHEA ALLEN Attorney for Idaho Power Company LISA D. NORDSTROM Attorney for Idaho Power Company DONOVAN E. WALKER Attorney for Idaho Power Company IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 4th day of August 2023, I served a true and correct copy of Idaho Power Company’s Response to the Second Production Request of the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Dayn Hardie Chris Burdin Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg No. 8 Suite 201-A (83714) PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0074 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email Dayn.Hardie@puc.idaho.gov Chris.Burdin@puc.idaho.gov Clean Energy Opportunities for Idaho Kelsey Jae Law for Conscious Leadership 920 N. Clover Dr. Boise, ID 83703 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email Kelsey@kelseyjae.com Courtney White Mike Heckler Clean Energy Opportunities for Idaho 3778 Plantation River Drive, Suite 102 Boise, ID 83703 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email courtney@cleanenergyopportunities.com mike@cleanenergyopportunities.com Industrial Customers of Idaho Power Peter J. Richardson Richardson Adams, PLLC 515 N. 27th Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email peter@richardsonadams.com IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 21 Dr. Don Reading 280 Silverwood Way Eagle, Idaho 83616 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email dreading@mindspring.com Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Association, Inc. Eric L. Olsen ECHO HAWK & OLSEN, PLLC 505 Pershing Avenue, Suite 100 P.O. Box 6119 Pocatello, Idaho 83205 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email elo@echohawk.com Lance Kaufman, Ph.D. 2623 NW Bluebell Place Corvallis, OR 97330 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email lance@aegisinsight.com Micron Technology, Inc. Austin Rueschhoff Thorvald A. Nelson Austin W. Jensen Holland & Hart, LLP 555 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3200 Denver, Colorado 80202 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email darueschhoff@hollandhart.com tnelson@hollandhart.com awjensen@hollandhart.com aclee@hollandhart.com clmoser@hollandhart.com Jim Swier Micron Technology, Inc. 8000 South Federal Way Boise, Idaho 83707 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email jswier@micron.com IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 22 City of Boise Ed Jewell Darrell Early Boise City Attorney’s Office 150 N. Capitol Blvd. Boise, ID 83701 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email ejewell@cityofboise.org dearly@cityofboise.org boca@cityofboise.org Wil Gehl Boise City Dept. of Public Works 150 N. Capitol Blvd. P.O. Box 500 Boise, Idaho 83701-0500 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email wgehl@cityofboise.org Idaho Conservation League Marie Callaway Kellner Idaho Conservation League 710 N. 6th Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email mkellner@idahoconservation.org Brad Heusinkveld Idaho Conservation League 710 N. 6th Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email bheusinkveld@idahoconservation.org IdaHydro C. Tom Arkoosh Arkoosh Law Offices 913 W. River Street, Suite 450 P.O. Box 2900 Boise, Idaho 83701 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email tom.arkoosh@arkoosh.com erin.cecil@arkoosh.com IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 23 Federal Executive Agencies Peter Meier c/o U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., S. W. Washington, DC 20585 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email peter.meier@hq.doe.gov Dwight Etheridge Exeter Associates 5565 Sterrett Place, Suite 310 Columbia, MD 21044 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email detheridge@exeterassociates.com NW Energy Coalition F. Diego Rivas 1101 8th Ave Helena, MT 59601 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX FTP Site X Email diego@nwenergy.org _______________ Stacy Gust, Regulatory Administrative Assistant