Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210813IPC to Sierra Club 1-12.pdf3Effia An lo coRP compeny JULIAA. HILTON Deputy General Counsel and Director of Legal ihilton@idahopower.com ,-,, .,;.iii'$,mlOll August 13,2021 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Jan Noriyuki, Secretary ldaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg 8, Suite 201-A(83714) PO Box 83720 Boise, ldaho 83720-0074 Re Case No. IPC-E-21-17 ln the Matter of Idaho Power Company's Application for Authority to lncrease lts Rates for Electric Service to Recover Gosts Associated with the Jim Bridger Power Plant Dear Ms. Noriyuki: Pursuant to Order No. 35058, please find ldaho Power Company's Response to the First Production Request of Sierra Club to ldaho Power Company enclosed for electronic filing. Due to the voluminous nature of confidential and non-confidential information provided in response to previous data requests in this case, the Company has posted the attachments to these responses to the secure FTP site to allow parties to view the requested information. Because certain attachments contained confidential information, the FTP site has been divided between confidential and non-confidential information. The login information for the non-confidential portion of the FTP site was provided to all parties on July 21, 2021, and the login information for the confidential portion was provided to those parties that executed the Protective Agreement in this matter on July 21,2021. !f you have any questions about the attached documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, c/-L.,-){(+ JAH:sg Enclosure Julla A. l-{rlton JULIA A. HILTON (lSB No. 7740) ldaho Power Company 1221West ldaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, ldaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-61 17 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 ihilton@ida hooower.com Attorney for ldaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE IDAHO PO\A'ER COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO RECOVER COSTS ASSOCIATED WTH THE JIM BRIDGER PLANT CASE NO. |PC-E-21-17 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMES NOW, ldaho Power Company ("ldaho Powef or "Company"), and in response to the First Set of Production Requests of Sierra Club to ldaho Power dated July 23, 2021, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 1 REQUEST NO, 1: Provide electronic copies of all data requests and responses received from or sent to other parties in this proceeding. lf electronic copies are not available, please contact counselfor Sierra Club to coordinate response. This is an ongoing request. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. {: To date, the Company has received data requests from the lndustrial Customers of ldaho Power and Staff of the ldaho Public Utilities Commission ("Commission"). Copies of ldaho Power's Response to the First Production Request of the lndustrial Customers of ldaho Power was served on the then- existing parties on July 1g,2021, and copies of ldaho Power's Response to the First Production Request of Commission Staff was served on the then-existing parties, including Sierra Club, on July 21,2021. As part of the responses provided on July 21, 2021, all parties received instructions for accessing ldaho Power's file transfer protocol (.FTP") site where copies of all confidential and non-confidential data responses can be found. Passwords for the FTP site were sent in a separate email the same day. As a matter of course, copies of Idaho Power's responses to discovery requests in this case will be provided to all intervening parties. The response to this Request is sponsored by Matt Larkin, Revenue Requirement Senior Manager, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 2 REQUEST NO. 2: Please refer to the Direct Testimony of Mr. Adelman at 4:14- 5:2. Please provide complete, unredacted copies of the agreements referred to, specifically the Agreement for Ownership of the Jim Bridger Project, the Agreement for the Construction of the Jim Bridger Project, and the Agreement for the Operation of the Jim Bridger Project, as well as Amendments 1 through 9. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2: Please see the Company's Response to the lndustrial Customers of ldaho Power's First Production Request No.44 accessible on the Company's FTP site. The response to this Request is sponsored by Ryan Adelman, Vice President of Power Supply, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 3 REQUEST NO. 3: Please provide complete, unredacted copies of the current fuel supply agreements for the Jim Bridger power plant. lf the Company does not have a fuel supply agreement for the Bridger mine, please provide the most recent fueling plan for the Bridger mine. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3: Please see ConfldentialAttachment 1 for the unredacted copy of the current fuel supply agreement between Black Butte Coal Company, ldaho Power and PacifiCorp, and ConfidentialAttachmenl2tor the current life of mine fueling plan budget for Bridger Coal Company ("BCC"), the current fueling plans for Bridger. The term of the current contract with Black Butte expires April 30, 2022. Deliveries from BCC end in 2028 in the current plan followed by final reclamation and monitoring activities through 2050. Due to the voluminous nature of confidential and non-confidential information provided in response to previous data requests in this case, ldaho Power provided parties access to an FTP site where copies of all confidential and non-confidentialdata responses can be found. ConfidentialAttachment Nos. 1 and 2 can be found in the confidentia! portion of that site. The response to this Request is sponsored by Randy Henderson, Principal Joint Projects Coordinator, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 4 REQUEST NO. 4: Has ldaho Power evaluated whether securitizing its remaining debt on the Jim Bridger plant would result in savings for the Company's customers when compared to accelerated depreciation as proposed in this proceeding? a. lf so, please provide such analysis. b. If not, explain why not. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.4: No. The Company's request in this case appropriately computes the Bridger-related revenue requirement in accordance with the Commission-approved cost of capital for prior coal plant recovery mechanisms. The Company did not analyze an alternative that departs from this Commission- approved rate of return. The response to this Request is sponsored by Matt Larkin, Revenue Requirement Senior Manager, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 5 REOU NO.5 : Please provide any analysis conducted by or for ldaho Power, other than ldaho Power's most recent IRP, evaluating whether exiting Jim Bridger earlier than the dates currently proposed in the Company's Second Amended 2019lRP would be economically beneficial for ldaho Power's customers. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.5: There has been no analysis performed outside of the lntegrated Resource Plan ("lRP") process that evaluated alternative exit dates for Bridger. The primary goal of the IRP is to ensure Idaho Power's system has sufficient resources to reliably serve customer demand and flexible capacity needs over the 2}-year planning period. As part of this process, the Company develops portfolios that are quantifiably demonstrated to eliminate the identified resource deficiencies, and qualitatively varied by resource type, in which the considered resource types reflect Idaho Power's understanding that the economic performance of a resource class is dependent on future conditions in energy markets and energy policy. To ensure the portfolios provide customers reliable and affordable energy, the Company selects a subset of the top-performing AURORA-produced portfolios to determine if additional resource modifications - primarily accelerated coal retirements - could further reduce costs and help achieve ldaho Power's clean energy commitments more quickly. The result of this robust analysis is a preferred portfolio that indicates favorable economics associated with the Company's exit from two of the four coal- fired generating units at Bridger by the end of 2026 and exit from the remaining two units at Bridger by 2030. However, ldaho Power recognizes its obligation to reliably deliver affordable electricity to customers cannot be compromised as it strives to IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 6 achieve clean energy goals and emphasizes the need to continue to evaluate the coal units' value in providing flexible capacity necessary to successfully integrate high penetration of variable energy resources. As a result, the Company prepares an IRP every two years, monitoring trends in the energy industry, updating cost inputs, and adjusting the preferred portfolio as a result of the updated analyses, including the potential earlier exit from a Bridger unit if proven to provide favorable economics while maintaining reliability. The response to this Request is sponsored by Matt Larkin, Revenue Requirement Senior Manager, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 7 REQUEST NO. 6: Please refer to Mr. Adelman's Direct Testimony on pages 6 and 7. a. Has ldaho Power evaluated the costs of installing SCRs on Bridger Units 1 and 2 if SCRs are required by the federa! government? If so, please provide such analysis. b. Did ldaho Power's modeling for its most recent IRP assume that SCRs would or would not be required on Bridger Units 1 and 2? c. lf the answer to subpart (b) is that ldaho Power assumed that SCRs would not be required, has Idaho Power completed any modeling assuming that SCRs will be required? If so, please provide such analysis. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 6: a - c. No. ldaho Power assumed Selective Catalytic Reductions ("SCR") would not be required by the federalgovernment on Bridger Units 1 and 2 in the Second Amended 2019|RP. ln addition, no subsequent cost analyses or modeling have been conducted pertaining to Bridger SCRs. The response to this Request is sponsored by Randy Henderson, Principal Joint Projects Coordinator, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 8 REQUEST NO.7: Please confirm whether ldaho Power has reached any partial, tentative, preliminary, or final agreement with PacifiCorp that would permit the Company to exit from the Jim Bridger plant in 2022 (unit 1\, 2026 (unit 2), 2028 (unit 3) and 2030 (unit 4). a. lf any agreement has been reached, please provide a copy of the written agreement or describe the agreement if such agreement is not written; b. lf no agreement has been reached, please describe the current status of ongoing negotiations with PacifiCorp. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 7: Please see the Company's Response to the lndustrial Customers of ldaho Power's First Production Request Nos. 7 and 20 accessible on the Company's FTP site. The response to this Request is sponsored by Ryan Adelman, Vice President of Power Supply, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 9 REQUEST NO. 8: PIease indicate whether Idaho Power and PacifiCorp have come to an agreement on an expected closure date for the Bridger coal mine. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 8: On July 31,2018, ldaho Power provided an updated confidential long-term fueling plan for the Jim Bridger plant to the Commission in Docket No. UE 333. This least-cost, least-risk fueling plan option prepared by PacifiCorp and ldaho Power identified a Bridger mine end of operations date of December 31,2028. This continues to be the estimated end-of-life date the partners consider as they jointly oversee the operations of the mine and fueling of the Bridger plant. The response to this Request is sponsored by Randy Henderson, Principal Joint Projects Coordinator, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB . 10 REQUEST NO. 9: lf no agreement has been reached, please indicate when Idaho Power expects the Bridger coal mine to close and whether that differs from when Pacificorp expects the mine to close. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 9: Please see the Company's Response Request No. 8. The response to this Request is sponsored by Ryan Adelman, Mce President of Power Supply, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB . 11 REQUEST NO. t0: Please refer to the Direct Testimony of Mr. Larkin at 11:7- 9 indicating that "Bridger will require incremental investments to maintain operations prior to the decommissioning of the plant." a. Please explain whether these incremental investments are intended to continue operations at Jim Bridger through 2030 or some later date. b. lf incremental investments are intended to continue operations at Jim Bridger beyond 2030, please explain why ldaho Power customers should contribute to maintaining operations at the plant beyond 2030. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 10: The forecasted Bridger investments for each unit included in the Bridger levelized revenue requirement only consider capital expenditures through ldaho Power's assumed exit date for each unit. ldaho Power is not able to determine with certainty the costs it may incur after it exits the final unit (if PacifiCorp elects to operate the units longer) until negotiations regarding the sharing of costs and ongoing ownership responsibilities are finalized between the two partners. As a result of this uncertainty and the length of time before these costs would be incurred, ldaho Power did not assume any potential Bridger costs responsibilities beyond its exit date from the fina! unit (2030) in the levelized revenue requirement calculation. The Bridger levelized revenue requirement would be adjusted over time through the proposed balancing account mechanism to reflect actua! costs the Company incurs as a result of the business terms negotiated. ldaho Power believes these assumptions represent a reasonable basis for determining the proposed Bridger levelized revenue requirement. The response to this Request is sponsored by Randy Henderson, Principal Joint IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB . 12 Projects Coordinator, ldaho Power Company IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 13 REQUEST NO. 11: Please refer to the Direct Testimony of Mr. Larkin at 26:12-21, indicating that ldaho Power assumes that it will be responsible for fixed O&M costs as Iong as PacifiCorp continues operating Jim Bridger units, but that all O&M costs responsibilities will cease in 2030. a. Please explain why ldaho Power has made this assumption; b. Please explain why ldaho Power customers should be responsible for fixed O&M costs at Jim Bridger units even after ldaho Power exits from these units? RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 11: Please see the Company's Response to the lndustrial Customers of Idaho Power's First Production Request Nos. 7 and 39 accessible on the Company's FTP site. The response to this Request is sponsored by Ryan Adelman, Vice President of Power Supply, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 14 REQUEST NO. 12: Please refer to the Direct Testimony Mr. Adelman at 15:18-16:8. Did ldaho Power evaluate Regional Haze compliance options for Jim Bridger that did not include the continued burning of coal, including conversion to natural gas or retirement? RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 12: The only Regional Haze compliance options ldaho Power evaluated for Bridger were the continued burning of coal and coa! unit retirements. The response to this Request is sponsored by John Carstensen, Joint Projects Leader, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRACLUB - 15 Respec{tu|ff submitted this 13s day of August 2021. Julia A. Hilton Attomey for ldaho Power Gompany IDAHO POI,-I/ER COMPANYS RESPONSE TO TTIE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUEST8 OF THE SIERRAELUB.16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 13th day of August 2021,1 served a true and correct copy IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE SIERRA CLUB upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Erick Shaner Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg No.8, Suite 201-A(837141 PO Box 83720 Boise, lD 83720-0074 lndustrial Customer of ldaho Power Peter J. Richardson RICHARDSON ADAMS, PLLC 515 North 27th Street (83702) P.O. Box 7218 Boise, ldaho 83707 Dr. Don Reading 6070 Hill Road Boise, ldaho 83703 ldaho Conservation League Benjamin J. Otto ldaho Conservation League 710 N. 6th Street Boise, ldaho 83701 City of Boise Ed Jewell Boise City Attorney's Office 150 N. Capitol Blvd. Boise, ldaho 83701 Hand Delivered _U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail -FAX X Email: Erick.shaner@puc.idaho.qov _Hand Delivered _U.S. Mai! _Overnight Mail _FAX_ FTP SiteX Email peter@richardsonadams.com _Hand Delivered _U.S. Mail _Overnight Mai! FAXX EMAIL dreadinq@ mindsorino.com _Hand Delivered _U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX EMAIL botto@idahoconservation.orq _Hand Delivered _U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX EMAIL eiewell@idahoconservation.oro IDAHO POIA'ER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB - 17 Clean Energy Opportunities for ldaho, Inc. Kelsey Jae Law for Conscious Leadership 920 N. Clover Dr., Boise, ldaho 83703 Michael Heckler Courtney \Mite 3778 Plantation River Drive, Suite 102 Boise, !D 83703 Sierra Club Rose Monahan Ana Boyd 2101 Webster Street, Suite 1300 Oakland, CA94612 Micron Technology, lnc. Austin Rueschhoff Thorvald A. Nelson Austin W. Jensen Holland & Hart LLP 555 17th Street, Suite 3200 Denver, CO 80202 Jim Swier 8000 S. FederalWay Boise, lD 83707 _Hand Delivered _U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAX X EMAIL kelsey@kelseyjae.com _Hand Delivered _U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAX X EMAIL m ike@clea nenergyopportu n ities. com cou rtnev@ clea nen erqvo p po rtu n ities. com _Hand Delivered _U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAX X EMAIL rose.monahan@sierraclub.oro ana. boyd@sierraclub. org _Hand Delivered _U.S. Mai! _Overnight Mail _FA)( X EMAI L darueschhoff@hollandhart.com tnelson@hollandhart.com awiensen@ holland hart. com aclee@holland hart. com g lga rg anoamari@ holland hart. com _Hand Delivered _U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAX X EMAIL iswier@micron.com eu^J= Stacy Gust, Regulatory Administrative Assistant IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST SET OF PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB . 18