Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210623IPC to Staff 1-4.pdfntmloN51yg1- An IDACORP Company June 23,2021 VIA ELECTRONIC iITAIL Jan Noriyuki, Secretary ldaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 West Chinden Blvd., Building 8 Suite 201-A Boise, ldaho 83714 Re Case No. IPC-E-21-15 ldaho Power Company's Application to Update the Gas Forecast in the lncremental Cost lntegrated Resource Plan Avoided Cost Model Dear Ms. Noriyuki: Attached for electronic filing is ldaho Power Company's Response to the First Production Request of the Commission Staff in the above entitled matter. lf you have any questions about the attached documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. Please be aware that Response Nos. 2 and 4 and the Attachment to Response No. 3 are confidential. Please handle the confidential information in accordance with the Protective Agreement executed in this matter. Very truly yours, DONOVAN E. WALKER Lead Counse! dwalker@idahopower.com DEW:cld Enclosures fuzda!4- Donovan E. Walker DONOVAN E. WALKER (lSB No. 5921) ldaho Power Company 1221West ldaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, ldaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5317 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 dwalker@ idahopower. com Attorney for ldaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE THE GAS FORECAST IN THE INCREMENTAL COST INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN AVOIDED COST MODEL CASE NO. |PC-E-21-15 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF COMES NOW, ldaho Power Company ("ldaho Power' or "Company"), and in response to the First Production Request of the Commission Staff to ldaho Power Company dated June 2,2021, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO PO\A/ER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REQUEST NO. 1: The 2017 lntegrated Resource Plan ("lRP") used the U.S. Energy lnformation Administration's ("ElA") Henry Hub High Oil and Gas Resource and Technology forecast. The 2019 IRP used the gas forecast from S&P Global Platts ("Platts"). Please describe the key difference between the two methods and explain the advantages of the Platts forecast over the EIA forecast. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 1: When preparing for the 2019 lntegrated Resource Plan in October 2018, the Company assessed the information in the chart below and determined that the EIA natural gas forecasts were significantly above market in the first several years; therefore, the Company decided to evaluate other sources: Henry Hub Natural Gas Forecast as of October 2018 s8.oo 57.00 Se.oo Ss.oo - EIA Ref Case - EtA High oil and Gas Market on 10/3/2018S4.oo 53.00 Sz.oo 20L8 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 Because the first few years of forwards are traded actively, ldaho Power felt that what the EIA was forecasting was not accurate, at least for those first few years. After examining how other utilities in the area forecast natural gas prices in their IRP's the Company observed that it is common practice to use third-party providers for such IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF .2 forecasts. For the study the Company used both Moody's and Platt's and the results are indicated in the chart below. Platt's forecast appeared to more closely align with the first several years of the forward market and then was in range with the others by 2026. Based on these observations, and the fact that Platt's is an industry leader in providing market information whose daily and monthly indexes are the standard for physical and financial transactions for the locations that are relevant to ldaho Power, the Company chose to use Platt's. Henry Hub Natural Gas Forecast as of October 2018 S8.oo s7.00 s6.oo - Plattrs - EIA Ref Case - EtA High oil and Gas Market on l0l3l20t9 - Moodys 5s.oo Sq.oo s3.oo s2.oo 20L8 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 \Mth respect to methodologies, both the EIA and Platt's use typical supply and demand fundamentals, assumptions fortechnological improvements, and othereconomic factors in their forecasts. The differences in the resulting forecasts are primarily due to the differences in the assumptions each entity makes for each factor, as well as the use of their own proprietary weighting of these factors in determining their independent natural gas price forecasts. For more information on factors the EIA used in their Annual Energy Outlook 2021 please refer to their website at the following address: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF .3 Similarly, Pletts' slide deck ftorn their presentation at the March 2021 IRPAC meeting is availabh upon request. The response to this Requeet is sponsored by Michael Polito, Power Supply Operations Senior Manager, ldaho Pover Company. IDAHO POTfVER COMPANYS RESPONSETOTHE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUESTS OFTHE COMMISSIO}I STAFF - 4 REQUEST NO. 2: The Application states that the 2021 Platts forecast is approximately 3% lower overall than the 2018 Platts forecast, except for the periods of 2021-2023 and 2039-2040. Please explain what causes the 2021 Platts forecast to be 3% lower and why the periods of 2021-2023 and 2039-2040 are exceptions. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2: Please see the confidentia! attachment provided for this response. The confidential attachment will be provided to those parties who have executed the Protective Agreement in this matter. The response to this Request is sponsored by Michael Polito, Power Supply Operations Senior Manager, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 5 REQUEST NO. 3: Please provide Table No. 1 in ConfidentialAttachment No. 1 in Excel format and include the 2021 EIA Henry Hub High Oil and Gas Resource and Technology forecast for comparison. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3: See the attached confidential Excelfile for the requested information. The response to this Request is sponsored by Michael Polito, Power Supply Operations Senior Manager, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 6 REQUEST NO.4: Please explain how Plafts determines the first five years of the natural gas forecasts. If forward market prices are used, how are they incorporated into the forecast, especially during the first five years of the forecast. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4: PIease see the confidential attachment provided for this response. The confidential attachment will be provided to those parties who have executed the Protective Agreement in this matter. The response to this Request is sponsored by Michael Polito, Power Supply Operations Senior Manager, ldaho Power Company. Respectfr.rlly submitted this 23rd day of June 2021. Mzrlat4- DONOVAN E. WALKER Attorney for ldaho Power Company IDAHO POIA/ER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 23d day of June 2021,1 served a true and correct copy of the within and foregoing IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: John R. Hammond Deputy Attorney General ldaho Public Utilities Commission Po Box 83720 Boise, ldaho 83720-0074 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail _ FAXX Email: iohn.hammond@puc.idaho.qov Christy Davenport, Legal Assistant IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 8