Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210625IPC to Staff 24-26.pdf DONOVAN E. WALKER Lead Counsel dwalker@idahopower.com June 25, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Jan Noriyuki, Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 West Chinden Blvd., Building 8 Suite 201-A Boise, Idaho 83714 Re: Case No. IPC-E-21-09 Idaho Power Company’s Application for Capacity Deficiency To Be Utilized For Avoided Cost Calculations Dear Ms. Noriyuki: Attached for electronic filing is Idaho Power Company’s Response to the Fourth Production Requests of the Commission Staff in the above entitled matter. Please handle the confidential information in accordance with the Protective Agreement executed in this matter. If you have any questions about the attached documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Donovan E. Walker DEW:cld Enclosures RECEIVED 2021June 25, PM 2:15 IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 1 DONOVAN E. WALKER (ISB No. 5921) Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5317 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 dwalker@idahopower.com Attorney for Idaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE CAPACITY DEFICIENCY TO BE UTILIZED FOR AVOIDED COST CALCULATIONS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-21-09 IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company (“Idaho Power” or “Company”), and in response to the Fourth Production Request of the Commission Staff to Idaho Power Company dated June 22, 2021, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 2 REQUEST NO. 24: Response to Staff’s Request No. 16 contains the proposed load forecast in the L&R in an annual format. Response to Staff’s Request No. 11 contains the latest forecast in an annual format. Comparing the two forecasts, the table below shows the latest load forecast is greater than the proposed load forecast in the Application. However, Response to Staff’s Request No. 16 states that the first deficit date will change to July 2029 if all variables are held constant except for using the latest load. Please explain why the updated first deficit date is later than the originally proposed first deficit date of August 2028, when the new load is greater. Please verify that the forecast used to determine the July 2029 deficit date in response to Production Request No. 16 uses the latest load forecast using 50th percentile loads. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 24: The load forecast submitted in response to Staff Request No. 11 was 90th percentile peak loads. For load and resource balance calculations to determine the first deficit date, Idaho Power utilizes 50th percentile peak loads. The load forecast provided in the Company’s response to Staff Request No. 16 and used in the Company’s Application in this case is slightly lower than the 2019 IRP forecast, resulting in a later (July 2029) deficit date. The response to this Request is sponsored by Jared Hansen, Resource Planning Leader, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 3 REQUEST NO. 25: Please provide both the forecast included in the Application and the latest forecast using 50th percentile peak loads in annual format from 2021 through 2040 and the resulting first deficit date due to the change in the forecast. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 25: Please see the CONFIDENTIAL Excel spreadsheet accompanying this request, which contains the sales and load forecast that was included in the Application in this case, as well as the most current sales and load forecast that was produced in March of 2021. Both forecasts are in 50th percentile energy and peak format and summarized by year. The resulting deficiency date due to a changed load forecast (and holding all other factors constant) remains July 2029, consistent with the date given in the Company’s response to Staff Request No. 16. The response to this Request is sponsored by Jared Hansen, Resource Planning Leader of Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 4 REQUEST NO. 26: Response to Staff’s Production Request No. 15 states that generation from Valmy could be replaced by market purchases from Southern market hubs. However, the amount of transmission capacity needs to change from 130 MW to 50 MW. Comparing the updated L&R in this response and the proposed L&R in the Application, Staff identifies that the difference between the two Market Purchase items in both L&Rs is approximately 310 MW, which is much greater than 80 MW (130 MW minus 50 MW). See example below. Please explain in detail the additional adjustments the Company has made to Market Purchases in addition to the 80 MW reduction. Market Purchases July 2025 August 2025 July 2026 August 2026 Proposed L&R 1054 MW 1079 MW 1054 MW 1078 MW Response to Production Request No. 15 744 MW 769 MW 744 MW 768 MW RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 26: The second amended 2019 IRP assumed that 131 MW of transmission would be made available for each North Valmy unit exit and that recent upgrades (increased line wavetrap ratings) would increase the Humboldt (NV Energy) to Midpoint 345 kV capability by 98 MW. The total of these assumptions is the 360 MW south-to-north capability of the Sierra (NV Energy) to Idaho transmission path following exit of each North Valmy unit (131 MW + 131 MW + 98 MW = 360 MW). Recently, the Company determined that firm transmission is not available from southern market hubs to North Valmy through the NV Energy system. Additional firm south-to-north transmission is also not available on the PacifiCorp East transmission path through Utah to Idaho. IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 5 Given the lack of firm and available transmission, the southern transmission capacity assumption for market purchases was reduced from 360 MW to 50 MW total. Idaho Power holds the 50 MW from an existing Transmission Service Reservation on the PacifiCorp East system from Red Butte to Borah. Red Butte is near the Mead trading hub, and firm transmission is available from Mead to Red Butte. The total southern transmission assumption has been reduced by 310 MW (360 MW minus 50 MW). The response to this Request is sponsored by Jared Hansen, Resource Planning Leader, Idaho Power Company. Respectfully submitted this 25th day of June 2021. DONOVAN E. WALKER Attorney for Idaho Power Company IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF - 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 25th day of June 2021, I served a true and correct copy of the within and foregoing IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH PRODUCTION REQUESTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Matt Hunter Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission Po Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX X Email: matt.hunter@puc.idaho.gov ________________________________ Christy Davenport, Legal Assistant