20210429IPC to Staff 1-17.pdf

6MRG r. .-r',fil..
".L. - "-'. L-:r
i',r, l,:'li ?3 Pi"; 3:'+0
McDOWELL RACKNER GIBSON PC
419 SW I lth Ave, Suite 400 | Portland, OR 97205
. L :,.I !fJ Aonu LowxevM(W)Wffi26
*am@rng{a r.ryrt
Re:
April29,2021
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Jan Noriyuki, Secretary
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg 8,
Suite 201-A (83714)
Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4
Case No. IPC-E-21-04
!n the Matter of ldaho Power Company's Application for a Determination of 2020
Demand-Side Management Expenses as Prudently lncuned
Dear Ms. Noriyuki:
Aftached for electronic filing, pursuant to Order No. 34781, is ldaho Power Company's
Response to the First Production Request of the Commission Staff, Nos. 1 through 17.
!f you have any questions about the attached documents, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Adam Lowney
cc: IPC-E-21-04 Service List (via email)
Attachments
main: 503 595 3922 | fax: [phone] | www.mrg-law.com
419 SW llthAve, Suite 400 | Portland, Oregon 97205-2605
ADAM LOWNEY (lSB No.10456)
McDowell Rackner Gibson PC
419 SW 11th Avenue, Suite 400
Portland, OR 97205
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
LISA D. NORDSTROM (lSB No. 5733)
Idaho Power Company
1221West ldaho Street (83702)
P.O. Box 70
Boise, ldaho 83707
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
I n o rd stro m @ id a h opowe r. co m
Attorneys for ldaho Power Company
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE IDAHO POWER
COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR A
DETERMINATION OF 2O2O DEMAND.SIDE
MANAGEMENT EXPENSES AS
PRUDENTLY INCURRED.
CASE NO. !PC-E-21-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S
RESPONSE TO THE FIRST
PRODUCTION REQUEST OF
THE COMMISSION STAFF
COMES NOW, ldaho Power Company ("ldaho Powe/' or "Compohy"), and in
response to the First Production Request of the Commission Staff to ldaho Power
Company dated April 8, 2021, herewith submits the following information:
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 1
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
REQUEST NO. 1: Please provide the cost-effectiveness workpapers and
calculations for each energy efficiency and demand response program in2020 in Excel
format, with allformulas intact.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 1: Please see the attachment provided to this
response.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REOUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 2
REQUEST NO. 2: Please provide the revenue (excluding interest) by class and
tariff schedule for the DSM tariff rider in 2020.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2: The table below contains the 2020 ldaho
Power Energy Efficiency Rider funding by rate class:
2020
Rate Glass Tariff Schedule Rider Fundins
Residential
Commercia!
lndustrial
lrrigation
Lighting
01,03,05,06
07, 08, 09
19,26,29,30
24
15,40, 41,42
13,O70,217
7,225,859
4,275,932
3,897,815
124,827
$
$
$
$
$
Total $ 28,594,651
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REOUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 3
REOUEST NO. 3: Please provide the calculation of the interest accrued to the
DSM tartff rider account.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3: Please see the attiachment provided to this
response.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Poner Company.
IDAHO POVVER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 4
REQUEST NO.4: Please provide a list of market transformation and marketing
activities offered by NEEA that the Company has opted out of for all or part of its service
territory.
a. For those activities, please provide a side-by-side comparison of NEEA
marketing activities and those conducted by the Company.
b. Please provide a financial comparison of those activities. lf applicable,
please identiff how much the Company was reimbursed from NEEA for
those marketing activities.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.4: The Company has not opted out of any market
transformation or marketing activities offered by NEEA in 2020.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 5
REQUEST NO. 5: Please provide the number of Advanced Metering
lnfrastructure ('AMl") switches for the A/C Cool Credit and lrrigation Peak Rewards
programs that the Company has in inventory.
RESPONSE TO REOUEST NO. 5:The inventory of Advanced Metering
lnfrastructure ('AMl') switches utilized in both the A/C Cool Gredit and lrrigation Peak
Rewards programs is approximalely 2,461 as of April 19,2021.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research and Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 6
REQUEST NO. 6: On page 3 of the 2020 DSM Annual report, the Company
states that due to COVID-19 protocols, in-home work was suspended for the following
programs: (1) Easy Savings: Low-lncome Energy Efficiency Education; (2) Energy
House Calls; (3) Home Energy Audit Program; (4) Multifamily Energy Savings
Program; and (5) Weatherization Solutions for Eligible Customers. Please answer the
following questions for each program:
a. Please provide the current status of each program.
b. Please provide the safety protocols and guidelines the Company is
adhering to in order to deem the programs safe to administer.
c. Once deemed safe to administer the programs, does the Company
expect any limitations and modification to the programs? lf yes,
please explain.
d. Once deemed safe to administer the programs, does the Company
expect any issues with ramping up the programs? !f yes, please explain.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 6:
1. Easy Savings: Low-lncome Energy Efficiency Education
a. In-home work with program contractors continues to be suspended due
to COVID-19 protocols.
b. Given the risk associated with in-home visits for customers, employees,
and contractors, the Company is proceeding cautiously. ldaho Power's
Emergency Management Team (.EMT') reviews several key monitors
related to the pandemic including, but not limited to, community spread,
positivity rate, and Company employee infections and quarantines, as
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 7
part of evaluating business processes that were paused due to the
pandemic. The EMT also closely monitors Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention and Iocal health department guidance. Additionally,
information related to operational criticality, need, and impact are
provided by the business unit. Al! these factors will be utilized in
providing a recommendation to Senior Leadership for approval of
restarting the in-home work.
c. \Mile the Company does not necessarily expect modifications to the
program, ldaho Power does anticipate the following safety protocols will
be required after approval of restarting the in-home work:
1. A daily health checklist will be required by the employee/contractor
before entering homes.
2. Masks will be required to be worn during the duration of the visit.
3. Social distancing will be utilized as much as possible during the
duration of the visit.
4. Contracts with Idaho Power's third-party suppliers will be updated
to include safety and protocol requirements for contractors.
The EMT will continue to evaluate the key monitors, previously noted,
and could, at any time recommend modifications to work practices or the
suspension of in-home work to ensure the safety of customers,
contractors, and the Company's employees.
d. No, the Company does not expect issues with ramping up the program
once it is deemed safe to administer. Community Action Partnership
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 8
agencies have been in contact with the HVAC contractors involved in
the program to ensure they are ready to resume when it is safe to do so.
2. Energy House Calls
a. ln-home work with program contractors continues to be suspended due
to COVID-19 protocols.
b. See answer to 1b. above.
c. See answerto 1c. above.
d. The Company does not expect issues with ramping up the program as
customers and contractors continue to express interest in resuming the
program. Enrollments are being accepted and the Company is
maintaining a waitlist until the program is deemed safe to resume in-
home activities. As of April 19,2021, 55 customers are currently on the
waitlist.
3. Home Energy Audit
a. ln-home work with program contractors continues to be suspended due
to COVID-19 protocols
b. See answer to 1b. above.
c. See answer to 1c. above.
d. The Company does not expect issues with ramping up the Home Energy
Audit program. Enrollments are being accepted, and the Company is
maintaining a waitlist until the program is deemed safe to resume in-
home activity. Once in-home activity resumes, the Company anticipates
scheduling pending applicants in the order they were received. Any
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 9
customer at that point not yet comfortable with having an auditor visit the
home will be held for a future date when the customer is comfortable
with the visit. As of April 19,2021, 323 customers were on the waitlist.
4. Multifamily Energy Savings Program
a. ln-home work with program contractors continues to be suspended due
to COVID-19 protocols.
b. Seeanswerto 1b. above.
c. See answerto 1c. above.
d. From a program perspective, the Company does not expect issues with
ramping up activity, however, it is aware that some renters may not yet
feel comfortable having contractors in their homes. As of April 19, 2021 ,
one complex was on the waitlist.
5. Weatherization Solutions for Eligible Customers
a. ln-home work with program contractors continues to be suspended due
to COVID-19 protocols.
b. See answer to 1b. above.
c. See answer to 1c. above.
d. lt is the Company's understanding that agency staffing has been
reduced as a result of the pandemic, which may result in delays to
weatherizing homes when in-home activity resumes. From the
Company's perspective, Idaho Power has continued its engagement
with agencies to identify opportunities to optimize the program and
stands ready to ramp up in-home activity once it is safe to do so. As of
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 10
April 19, 2021, the total waitlist for the program includes 104 customers.
Of these, 18 projects began pre-COVID and were placed on hold as of
March 2020.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Cornpany.
IDAHO POV'JER COMPANYS RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 11
REQUEST NO.7: On page 51 of the 2020 DSM Annual Report, the Company
states that there is a waiting list for the Energy House Calls Program. Please answer
the following regarding the Energy House Calls Program:
a. PIease provide the current number of customers on the waitlist for the
program.
b. How many customers were on the waitlist at the end of 2020?
c. How long does the Company anticipate it willtake to serve all customers
on the wait list?
d. When the Company deems the program safe to administer again, does
the Company foresee any issues with retaining contractors to administer
the program? lf yes, please explain.
e. Please provide a breakdown of expenses incurred for the program
following the suspension of the program due to COVID-19 in March
ol 2020.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 7:
Regarding the Energy House Calls Program:
a. There are currently 55 customers on the waitlist for the Energy House Calls
program.
b. There were approximately 45 customers on the waitlist at the end of 2020.
c. After consultation with the third-party contractors who perform the in-home
work, ldaho Power predicts it may take 3-6 months to get through all the
jobs on the waitlist.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 12
d. No, contractors for the program plan on continuing to work on the program
and are anxious to resume fteld visits.
e. Please see the attachment provided forthis response for expenses incured
since suspension of in-home activity for the program.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANYS RESPONSE TOTHE FIRST PRODUCTION
RESUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 13
REQUEST NO. 8: On page 61 of the 2020 DSM Annual report, the Company
states that there is a waiting list for the Home Energy Audit program. Please answer
the following regarding the Home Energy Audit Program:
a. Please provide the current number of customers on the waitlist for the
program.
b. How many customers were on the waiting list at the end of 2020?
c. How long does the Company anticipate it will take to serve all customers
on the wait list?
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 8:
a. There are 332 customers on the waitlist for the program as of April 19,
2021.
b. There were 233 customers on the waitlist for the program at the end of
2020.
c. After consultation with the third-party contractors who perform the in-home
work, ldaho Power predicts it may take 7-9 months to serve all customers
on the waitlist.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 14
REQUEST NO. 9: On page 45 of the 2020 DSM Annual Report, the Company
states that due to Welcome Kits no Ionger being cost-effective as a stand-alone
measure that the kits will now be offered as a promotional item in 2021. Please answer
the following questions regarding the Welcome Kits in 2021:
a. What are the Company's projected cost for implementing the
program as a promotional item?
b. What are the projected savings for the kit?
c. How will these savings be reported?
d, What programs does the Company plan to cross-promote in
conjunction with the Welcome Kits?
e. What offerings will be included in the Welcome Kits?
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 9:
a. The projected costs to send Welcome Kits to new customers is estimated
to be approximately $610,605 in 2021. This includes the cost of the bulbs,
assembly of the kits, packaging, educational materials, shipping and
handling. For program year 2020, the majority of the costs associated with
the Welcome Kits were charged to the Educational Distributions program,
with a small portion (approx. 7 percent of total program costs) related to the
educational materials assigned to the Residential Energy Efficiency
Education lnitiative ('REEEl"). The educational materials in the kit
encourage the adoption of new energy efficient behaviors and promote
participation in other ldaho Power energy efficiency programs. For program
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 15
year 2021, the Company intends to assign more of the Welcome Kit costs
to REEEI; however, the specifics have not been decided at this time.
b. The projected savings are estimated to be 22.86 kilo-watt hours per kit.
c. The savings will be reported as part of the Educational Distributions
program.
d. The 202l educational flip book included with the kit will cross-promote the
following programs: A/C Coo! Credit, Energy House Calls, Heating &
Cooling Efficiency Program, Home Energy Audit, Multifamily Energy
Savings Program, Rebate Advantage, Residentia! New Construction (pilot),
Shade Tree Project, and both whole-house weatherization programs-
Weatherization Assistance for Qualified Customers and Weatherization
Solutions for Eligible Customers.
e. The 2021 Welcome Kits wil! contain an educational flip book, a Light-
Emitting Diode ("LED") nightlight, two 800-lumen LED bulbs, two 1600-
lumen LED bulbs, and a greeting card.
The response to the request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer Research
& Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 16
REQUEST NO. 10: On page 31 of the 2020 DSM Annual Report, the Company
states that communication levels exceeded 90% for the cycling events for the A/C Cool
Credit program. When communication failed for the cycling events please answer the
following questions:
a. \l/hat communication occurs with the customers in the event of a
communication failure from a cycling event?
b. What is the Company's process for diagnosing the failed
communication?
c. \A/hen a cycling event is activated and communication did not occur, are
incentives paid to the customers whose devices failed to communicate?
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 10:
a. Communication with the customer may take the form of a phone call,
an in-person visit from a technician, or a door hanger left at the premise
in the case of a site visit when the customer is not home. !f the
communication failure with the switch is an ongoing issue, the switch is
investigated to see if the issue can be resolved.
b. The devices are automatically "pinged" throughout the year to check
communications. This happens daily during the spring and summer, and
at least three times a week during the fall and winter. A monthly report
provides information on which switches did not successfully
communicate and the number of failures.
This information is tracked on an ongoing basis to discover patterns. An
example is a switch that is communicating normally over the course of a
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 17
period and then stops all communication, but the customer's electricity
usage indicates they may still be running their air conditioner. ln this
case, a technician would visit the site to diagnose the issue and correct
if possible. lt is through this process that failed communication with
devices is diagnosed and addressed.
c. The financial incentive of $5.00 is paid per month, not per event, to
participants in the A/C Cool Credit program even if their device failed to
communicate during an event. lf communications to a device fails on an
ongoing basis, which is identified using the process described in the answer
above, a technician will make every effort to correct the issue. lf it is not
possible to correct the issue, the customer would be removed from the
program and no longer receive the incentive.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 18
REQUEST NO. 1{: Please answer the following regarding the lrrigation Peak
Rewards Program:
a. Please provide the average number of service points per customer in
2020.
b. Please provide the number of customer opt-outs per dispatch event.
c. PIease provide the tota! estimated amount of demand response reduction
not realized as a result of customer opt-outs per dispatch event.
d. Please provide the amount of device failures per dispatch event.
e. Please provide the total estimated amount of demand response reduction
not realized as a result of device failures per dispatch event.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 11:
a. The average service points per customer in 2020 was 5.
b. The customer opt-outs per dispatch event were as follows: 612412020 -
9 customers with 18 service points,712112020 - 9 customers with 15
service points, 713112020 - 17 customers with 56 service points.
c. The tota! estimated amount of demand response reduction not realized as
a result of customer opt-outs was as follows: 612412020 - 2.9 mega-watts
("MW'), 712112020 - 1.24 MW, and 713112020 - 8.3 MW.
d. The amount of device failures per dispatch event as a percent of enrolled
MW were as follows: 612412020 - 5.48o/o, 712112020 - 5.91o/o, and
713112020 - 4.83%. This information can also be found on page 9 of the
2020 Irrigation Peak Rewards Program Report located in Supplement 2
to the 2020 Demand-Side Management Report.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 19
e. The total estimated amount of demand response reduction not realized as
a result of device failureswas as follows: 612412020 - 10.36 MW,712112020
- 8.68 MW, and 71311202A - 6.95 MW
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research &Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POVVER COMPANYS RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 20
REQUEST NO. 12: On page 87 of the 2020 DSM Annual Report, the Company
describes a "do-it-yourself weatherization" bill insert. \A/hat was the cost of this insert
and was it assigned to the Weatherization Solutions for Eligible Customers program or
another program? ls the Company claiming any energy savings from the bill insert?
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. {2: The cost for sending the bill insert to all
residential customers in ldaho was $4,283. Because any residential customer may
benefit from installing these types of measures, the bill insert was considered a general
education/awareness piece and was assigned to the Residential Education lnitiative.
\Mile it is likely these education efforts will result in energy savings experienced by a
participating customer and accruing to the Company's system over time, ldaho Power
did not claim any energy-savings from the bill insert.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 21
REQUEST NO. 13: On page 26 of the Goralski Direct Testimony, he states
that the Company continued marketing efforts for suspended programs. Please
provide a list of these marketing expenses and please explain why the Company
continued marketing for suspended programs.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 13: Please see the aftachment provided to this
response for the list of marketing expenses.
ldaho Power continued with Iimited marketing for one program, Home Energy
Audits. Some items, including the March bill insert and February/March digital ads, were
scheduled and running before in-home program activity was suspended in mid-March
2020. The Company marketed the program afier March 2020 in a limited capacity to
maintain awareness and afford customers the opportunity to get on the waitlist. Because
many customers were working from home and noticing potential household projects and
improvements, the marketing was tailored using the following message: "Looking to
improve your home after spending so much time in it?"
The marketing activities included customer bill inserts in July, September and
December. The December bill insert contained a disclaimer statement: "Auditor visds
are on hold due to COVID-l9. By signing up, you will be added to a list and contacted
when auditor w'sifs tesume."
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 22
REQUEST NO. 14: PIease describe the methodology change to the Effective
Load Carrying Capacity ("ELCC") used in calculating the Value of Demand ('VOD')
referenced in the Goralski Direct Testimony on page 34. Please include workpapers for
the Company's calculations, in electronic format with links intact and formulae enabled.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 14: The value of demand included in the report,
and ultimately cited in the testimony, was based on the Effective Load Carrying Capacity
("ELCC") established in the 2013 settlement. ln a January 2021 meeting, the Company
and Staff discussed that a revision may be warranted to update the ELCC to reflect the
most recent S-year period. Subsequent to that discussion, the Company performed an
analysis to determine if program cost-effectiveness would be impacted under an updated
ELCC. The result was an ELCC of 85 percent based on 2016-2020 data inputs, which
results in a total value of demand of approximately $18 million, as compared to the $19.6
million using the ELCC of 93 percent from the 2013 settlement. ln 2020, the cost of
operating all three demand response programs was $7.7 million, and ldaho Power
estimates that if the three programs were dispatched for the full 60 hours, the total costs
would have been approximately $10.9 million. Please see the attachment provided to
this response showing how the updated 85 percent ELCC was calculated using 2016-
2020 top 100 hours data, as well as how the $1 8 million value of demand was calculated
using an updated ELCC of 85 percent.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 23
REQUEST NO. 15: Please provide workpapers supporting Table 4-1,Table 4-2,
and Table 4-3 on pages 13-14 in the DNV-GL's "ldaho Power Educational Distributions
lmpact and Process Evaluation" report. Please include workpapers in electronic format
with links intact and formulae enabled.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 15: Please see the attachments provided to this
response. Please note the folder contains several files, some of which are confidential.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 24
REQUEST NO. 16: Please provide workpapers supporting Table 5, Table 6, and
Table 7 on pages 12-15 in the Tetra Tech's "ldaho Power Company lrrigation Efficiency
Rewards Program" report. Please include workpapers in electronic format with links
intact and formulae enabled.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 16: Please see the attachment provided to this
response. Please note the folder contains several files, some of which are confidentia!.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 25
REQUEST NO. 17: Please provide workpapers supporting Table 2-1 and
Table 2-2 on page 8 in the ADM Associates, lnc's "Rebate Advantage PY2019 M&V
Report". Please include workpapers in electronic format with links intact and formulae
enabled.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 17: Please see the attachment provided to this
response. Please note the folder contains severa!files, some of which are confidential.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Quentin Nesbitt, Customer
Research & Analysis Leader, ldaho Power Company.
Respectfully submitted this 29th day of April 2021.
ADAM LOWNEY
LISA D. NORDSTROM
Attorneys for ldaho Power Company
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 26
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 29th day of April2021, ! served a true and correct
copy IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF upon the following named parties by the
method indicated below, and addressed to the following:
Commission Staff
Matt Hunter, Deputy Attorney General
!daho Public Utilities Commission
11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg No. 8,
Suite 201-A(83714')
PO Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
Jan Noriyuki, Secretary
11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg 8,
Suite 201-A (83714)
PO Box 83720
Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4
lndustrial Customerc of ldaho Power
Peter J. Richardson,
Richardson Adams PLLC
515 N.27th St
P.O. Box 7218
Boise, ldaho 83702
Dr. Don Reading
6070 Hill Road
Boise, Idaho 83703
ldaho Conservation League
Benjamin J. Otto
710 N. 66 St.
Boise, ldaho 83702
Hand Delivered
_U.S. Mai!
_Overnight Mail
_FA)(X Email [e-mail]
Hand Delivered
_U.S. Mail
_Overnight Mail
-FAX
X Email [e-mail]
Hand Delivered
_U.S. Mai!
_Overnight Mail
_FA)(X Email [e-mail]
dreadinq@ mindsorino.com
Hand Delivered
_U.S. Mail
_Overnight Mail
FA)(X Email botto@ idahoconservation.orq
A!4,-t^ TJ!
Alisha Till, Paralegal
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF 27
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
GASE NO. IPC-E-21-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
ATTACHMENT TO REQUEST NO. 1
TO
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF
rPc-E-21-04
R$ponse to Staff No. I
Cost-Effectiveness Summary by Program
EABcD
1
G
s
benefit
7
s
s
Annual Gros
Costs
Costs with
Adder
Bill SavinBs
Educational Di5tributions 19,909,747 too%s s,827,739 s 6,410,s13 s 8,899,543
EnerEv Effi cient LichtinR 13.942.202 100%s 7.s94.591 s 8.3s4.050 s 12.333.930
Enersv House Calls 56.944 700%s 29.017 s 31.919 s 55.340
Heatinc & Coolinc Efficiencv Prosram 1.839_058 1009(s 1-009-479 r.770.427s s 7.626.927
Multifamily Energy Savings Prosram 2A,04,.100%12,318 13,550 20,707
Rebate Advanta{e 366.678 100%s 304.047 s 334.452 s 601.152
Residential New Construction Pilot Procram 649.\22 too%s 731.230 s 804-353 1.145_182s
Shade Tree Proiect s2.662 72tv s s s
SimDle SteDs, Smart Savinrs -148,404 1009{77,491s s 85,229 177,745s
Weatherization Assistance for Qualified Customers 218.611 70o%s 160.708 s t76.779 s 307.429
Weatherization Solutions for Elisible Customers 47_360 t0/]%s 28.385 s 31.224 57-901s
Commerclel and lndustrial
C&l EE - Custom Proiects 94.006.717 1009(s 58.874.100 s 64.761.510 s 37.569.495
C&l EE - New Construction 14.555_936 to/J%8_097.575s 4.907.444s 7.740.477s
C&l EE - Retrofits 20.955.21S 100P1 s 11_655.243 s 12.420.769 s tt.t4r.tt
Commercial Energv-Savings Xits 258,368 100%s 128.900 s 741,790 s t28,M3
Small Business Direct lnstall 780.250 100x s 352.505 s 387.757 s 330.703
lrriration
s s
Easy Savings: Low-lncome Energy Efficiency Education 10,628 too%s 1,144 s 1,258 s 2,534
Home Energv Audit ProEram 31,938 100%s 15,417 s 15,958 s 25,2tt
Oreson Residential Weatherization 0 1009(s s s
Residential Enerw Efficiencv Education lnitiative
Residential Overhead
Commercial/lndustrial
Commercial/lndustriaUlrrication Overhead
Oreron Commercial Audit
Green Motors - lndustrial 56.012 700%s 20.643 s 22.704 s 13_802
Green Motors - lrriEation 36,747 100%s 45,464 s 50,01r 27,76ts
(Xher
Enersv Efficiencv Direct Prorram Overhead
lndired Prosram Exoanses
Enero Efficiencv Accountins and Analvsis
Energy Efficiencv Advisory Group
SDecial Accountinc Entries
fotal ldaho Porer Enerrv EffiGienw Portfolio ErD€nses taa.aaa.27,108.566.677 s 119.rUt3.345 s 90.398.790
adiustment WAOC - OH allocation alreadv accounted
adjustment Weatherization Solutions - OH allocation already accounted
Iotal ldaho Power Eneryy Efficiency Portfolio hpenses (Less
Adiustmentsl 1E0.818,277 108,566,677 s 119,tr8345 s 90,39t 790
Residential EE Sector 37.301.800 15.791.558 17.370.713s 3 25.1!r4.OlO
Commercial/lndustrial EE S€ctor'130,632,507 79,L29,070 S 87,ur.,977 s s7,024,034
lrrigation EE sector 5 12.88,!t.970 13.6tl5,050 s 15.010.655 3 8,180.7t6
Cool Credit
Power Portfolio '
Flex Peak Prorram
Peak Rewards
total DSM Expense'
ilotB:
2. Odtcr programs and Ac{rrlt.s Grpcnriea includ.d ln tlE ovrtail Portbllo @6t afulvlols3. SomG lncludad in thc sccto, aort Gfilctfrrcn.3t.
rffcrtwmrrsn#cs,butthrcostlt.rcrumowdlnthcportfollocost-rffccdrrn rranalyrBtonoto,crst t ftGcortrmddoubhcoufttrreasB.
.1. Commcr'cLutn&rifrlal EncAy Etreicncyscctor coet{ftcthEncrs rrtlo3 trcludai.vfiI3.nd p.rttlpilrt co.ts ftom Gean Mobls nc*ih& hom [aG:14.
5. lrErtlon Encrly Etrdancy S.ctor co6t-rfurrcnsr rffo. lncfudG glullEi ard partlclp.nt corB ftom Gra.n iroto.t Rai,ln& fiom nnG 35.
7. Totd tsM cl$etl3s. RGfi!rcnc. 160 Ucs to tht Tobl DSM E ectt3cs ln lgpcndka. 2 - 3.
rPc.E-21-04
Response to Staff No. 1
Educational Distri butions
Segment: Residential
2020 Program Results
Net Benefit lnouts Ref.
Resource Savlngs
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kWh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kwh)
'10% Crodit (Northwest PorerAct)
19,909,74 1
114,912,206 $
$
5,E27,739
s82,774
Total Electric Savings $ 6,410,513
Participant Bitl Savings
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings $ 8,899,541
Other Benefits
Non-Utility Rebatos/lncentives
Non-Enerov Benefts
t
3 2-377.9O1
s
A
B
NUI
NEB
of Cost-Effectiveness Results
in Eech Teet
5,8:
8,7t
5,E:
N/A
S'NTG
(A+NUl+Nl
S-NTG
N/A
$
$
$
Cocts
Discounl Rate
Nominal WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + E6calation)) - 1
Escalation Rate
Net-toGross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segmont Rate/kwh
Notes:
Enorgy savings as reported by Franklin Energy for the 2019-2020 student kits.
NEBs for give away bulbs, welcome kit bulbs, and energy-savings kits include PV of periodic bulb redacamont costs.
NEBS for student kit and energy-savings kit shoriverheads include the net present value (NPV) ofwater and wastewator savings and, wten applicable, therm savings.
No participant cost.
2020 cost-offectiveness ratios include evaluation exponses. lf evalution expenses were removed from the program's cost+tfectiveness, the UCT and TRC would be 1.4E ar
Line
Cost lnputs Ref.
Program Administratlon $ 4,006,023
Prooram lncentives 3 I
P
i,
Totel Utilitv Coet 3 4.006.023
Measure Eouloment and lnstallation (lncnmental Particioant Costl 3
Utility Cosl Test
Tolal R€source Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpacl Measure Tesl
Cost Tesl
Utility Cost Test
Total Resourco Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpac{ Measure Test
tPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff No. 1
Easy Savings: Low-lncome Energy Efficiency Program
Segment: Residential
2020 Program Results
Notes:
No participant cost.
of Cost-Effectiveness Resultg
Beneflts and Coets lncluded in Each Tect
for Levelized Calculations
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / ('l + Es661"1;onr - ,
Escahtion Rate
Net-to-Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rat€/kwh
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cost lnputs Ref.
Program Admlnbtration
Proqram lncentives
$9,503
$I
P
irl
Total utilltv Coct t 9.503
teasuru EouiDment end lnstallation (lncrement l ParticiDant Costl i
Nat Benefit lnputs Ref.
Rerource Savings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kwh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kWh)
10% Credit (Northwtsst PorverAc{)
10,62E
33,4E7 $
$
1,144
't14
Total Electric Savings t 1,258
Participant Bill Savings
NPV Cumuhtive Participant Bill Savings $2,5y
Other Benefits
Non-Utility R6bates/lncentives
Non-Enerqv Benefits
$I
S
A
B
NUI
NEB
Test
Cost Test
Utility Cost Test
Total R$ource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Rosource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Cosl Test
tPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff llo. t
Energy Efficient Lighting
Segmenk Residential
2020 Program ResulB
Notos:
NEBs include PV of periodic bulb roplacement costs.
Cost lnouts Ref,
Program Admlnbtratlon $
3
7U,43
Prooram lncentives 882.117 I
P
it
Totrl Utllitv Cost 3 1.667.{59
il.trur. Eouioment end lnrtelletlon Oncremenbl PtrtlclD.nt Coitl 3 2.28{.338
of Cost EflecUveness Results
Benellta and Coctr lncluded ln Each Tost
= S'NTG
=(A+NUl+Nt
NTG
= S'NTG
+++
for
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real (1 + wAcc) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Escalation Rat6
Net-tccross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/kWh
$
$
$
7,5(
12,E|
7,5(
17 7'.
T..t
Utility Cost Test
Total R$ource Cost T€st
Ratepayer lmpacl Measure Test
Perticioant Cosl Test
Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpaci Measure T6st
l,trilig Cost Test
Net Benefit Ref.
Partlclpant Bill Savingr
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings
Non-utility Rebates/lncentives $t
BenoltE
$ 12,333,930
Savingr
$
7,594,591
8,354,050Total Electric Savings
10% Credit Pouler
13,942,202
149,197,560 S
$
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kWh)
NPV Cumulative Eneryy (kWh)
B
NUI
s
A
tPc-E-21-O4
Response to staff No. 1
Energy House Calls
Segment: Residential
2020 Program Results
Notes:
NEBs include PV of periodic bulb replacoment costs for direct install LED bulbs.
NEBS for showerheads and faucet aerators include the net present value (NPV) ofwater and waste water savings.
No participant costs.
of Gost-Effectiveness Results
Beneflt
N/A
and Costs lncluded in Each Test
S'NTG
(A+ NUI + Nl
S-NTG
N/A
$
$
$
for Levelized Calculations
Discounl Rale
Nominal (WACC)
Real (('l + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Escalstion Rato
Nettccross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/kWh
Line Losses
Cost lnputs Ref.
Program Administration $
3
s,352
Prooram lncentives I
P
M
Total Utiliw Cost $6,352
Measure Equipment and lmtallatlon (lncremental Participant Co.t)$
Test
Utility Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
lmpacl Measure T€st
Benefit Ref.
Participant Bill Savings
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings
Other Benefi6
Polrer
$55,3100
$
$Total Electric Savings
29,017
31,919
Non-Utility Rebates/lncentives
Benefits
56,944
659,466 $
Savings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kwh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kWh)
B
NUI
NEB
s
A
rPc-E-21-(E
Respo$etostaffNo. I
Green Motors - lndustrial
Segment lndustrial
2020 Program Results
Cost lnouts Ref.
Progr.m AdmlnistraUon
Prooram lncentives
$
3 I
P
tul
Tote! tltilitv Goct 3
Ueaiur€ Eouioment and lnrtallation {lncremental ParticlDant Cost)$8.48t
of Cost-Effectlveness Results
and Coctr lncluded in Erch Test
for Levelized Calculatlone
Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Rate
(NTG)
NTG Sensitivity
Customor Segment Rate/kWh
Lo33es
Beneflt
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Net Beneflt lnpuE Ref.
Recource Savings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kwh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kWh)
10% Crodit (Northwest PorverAc-t)
56,012
406,343 $
$
20,643
2,064
Total Elec.tric Savings $12,708
Partlclpant Bll! Savlngs
NPV Cumuhtive Participant Bill Savings t 13,802
Othor Benefits
Non-Utility Rebatevlncentives t
3Non-Enerov Benefits
s
A
NUI
NEB
Teat
Cost Te6t
Resource Cost Test
lmpac't Measure Test
Cost Test
Cost Test
Resource Coet Test
lmpacl Moasure Tost
Cost Test
tPC-E.21-(X
Rcsponse to Staff ilo. 1
Green Motors - lrrigation
Segment lnigation
2020 Program Results
Cost lnputr Ref.
Program Admlnldrallon $
WlttyCoct $
teacuro Eouloment and lmt lla0on {lncromentel P.rticlDsnt Coat}$12.192
!
P
m
of Cost€ffectlvoneaa Results
lnd Costr lncluded in E ch T.st
for Levellzed Calculatlonc
Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - I
Rate
(NTG)
NTG Sensitivity
CuBtomer Segment Rate/kwh
Beneflt
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Net Beneflt lnDuts Ref.
Rerource Savlnp
2020 Annual Gros3 Enorgy (kwh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kWh)
t0% Crodit (Nortlnrest PorcrAct)
fi,117
171,122 $
$
45,464
4,546
Total Elec{ric Savings $50,011
Participant Blll Savlngs
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings $27,781
Other Benefitr
Non-Utility Rebatos/lncentives t
3Non-Enamv Benefils
s
A
B
NU!
NEB
Tert
Cost Tost
Resource Cost Test
lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
lmpact MeasurB Test
Cost Test
lPiC-E-21-(lr
Response to Staff No. 1
Heating & Cooling Efficiency Program
Segment Residential
2020 Program Results
Notes:
NEBs include NPV of RTF values for annual O&M savings and monetized comforl savings.
1,0(
't,5t
1,0(
$
$
$
Results
S'NTG
(A+NUl +Nl
NTG
S*NTG
B+l+NUl+
for Levelized Calculations
Discount Rate
Nominal WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Escalation Rate
Net-to-Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Average Customer Segment Rate/kwh
Line Lossos
Cost Inputs Ref.
Program Administration $2s8,370
Prooram lncantives s 368.190 I
P
l,
Total Utilitv Cost $606,559
teasure Equipment and lnctallation (lncremental Participant Cost)$1.653.423
Net Benefit Ref.
Non-Utility Rebates/lncentives
Benefits
$
$
$ 1,626,927
Total Elec{ric Savings
1,009,479
1,110,427
SaYings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kWh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kwh)
Bill Savings
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings
't,E39,066
19,6E0,'t87 $
B
NUI
NEB
s
A
Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpac{ Measure Test
Total Resourc€ Cost Tost
Ratepayor lmpact Measure Test
Utility Cost Test
Cost Test
tpc-E-2l-tt{
Response to Staff t{o. 1
Home Energy Audit Program
Segment Residential
2020 Program Reeults
Cost lnouts Ref.
Prcgam Admlnlrtr.Uon
Prooram lncontlvss
3 130,545
t I
P
t
Total l,ftllltv Coct 3 130.548
teasum Eouloment and lmt llsUon (lncr.m.ntal PartlclDant Costl 3 t2.t03
of Gost-EffecUveness
Beneflt rnd Co3t3 lncluded ln Each
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Escalation Rate
Net-'tGcross (NTG)
Customer Segmont RetoftWh
Line Losses
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Net Benellt lnputg Ref
Rerource Savlngs
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kWh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kwh)
10% Cr€dit {Northuest PowerAc,t)
31,93E
309,752 t
3
15,417,ta,
Total Electric Saving8 $16,958
Partlclpant Blll Savlnge
NPV Cumulative Participanl Bill Savings t 25,211
other Beneftll
Non-Utility Rebatos/lnc€ntives
Non-Enerqv Benefits
t
$6.135
s
NUt
NEB
T..t
Utilig Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratspayer lmpac't Measure Test
Particioant Cost Test
Resource Coet Teet
Ratepayer lmpaci Measure Test
Utility Cost Test
Cost Test
tPc-E-21-O4
Response to Staff No. 1
Multifamily Energy Savings Program
Segment: Residential
2020 Program Results
Notes:
NEBS include PV of periodic bulb rephcement costs tor direci install LED bulbs.
NEBS for shorverheads and faucet aerators include the net presenl value (NPV) ofwater and waste water savings.
No participant costs.
Sum of Cost-Effectiveness Results
Benefit
N/A
Benefits and Costs lncluded in Each Test
= S'NTG
=(A+NUl +Nl
NTG
= S. NTG
Rete
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Rate
(NTG)
NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/kwh
$
$
$
Cost lnouts Ref.
Program Administration
Proqram lncentaves
$
i
89,829
I
P
it
Total Utilitv Cost 3 89.829
Measurc EouiDment and lmt llation {lncrementel ParticiDant Cost)3
Net Benefit lnputs Ref.
Resource Savings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kwh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kWh)
10% Credit (Northwest PowerAct)
28,041
256,460 $
$
12,3'.t8
1,232
Total Elec{ric Savings $13,550
Particip.nt Bill Savings
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings $20,707
Other Benefits
Non-Utility Rebates,/lncentives
Non-Enerqv Benefits
$
$11.486
s
A
B
NUI
NEB
Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cosl Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
lmpact Measure Test
tFc.E-21.04
Response to Staff llo. 1
Oregon Residential Weatherization
Segmenh Residential
2020 Program Results
Gost lnputs Ref.
Program Admlnbtratlon $5,313
teasurc Equloment and lnrtalhtlon (lncremental Participant CoEt)t
I
P
it
Beneflt
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
for Levellzed Celcuhtlonc
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Escahtion Rate
Net-toGross (NTG)
Customer Segment Rate/kWh
Line Losses
Net Beneflt lnputs Ref.
Rerource Sevlngt
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kVVh) 0
NPV Cumulative Energy (kM) 0 $
10% Cr€dit (Northw€st PorcrAct) $ -
Total Elec'tric Savings $ -
Prrtlclpant BIll S.vlngs
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings I
Other Bonefitr
Non-Utility Rebates/lncentives t
3Non-Enemv Bensfits
s
B
NUr
NEB
of
Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Co6t Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Utility Cost Test
Tolal Reeource Cost Tsst
Ratopayer lmpaci Measurs Test
rPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff ]to. I
Rebate Advantage
Segment Residential
2020 Program Results
of Cott-Effectlveness Results
Bonefiti rnd Coetc lncluded ln Elch Tost
= S'NTG
=(A+NUl +Nl
NTG
=S*NTG
=B+l+NUl+
lor Levellzed Calcul.tlon!
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Roal ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - I
Escahtion Rete
Net-{o-Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivig
Cu3tomor Sogment Rato/kwh
Une Losses
Notec:
2020 cost-efbc'tiveness ratioe indude evaluation expenses. lf evalufion expenses were removed from the program's cost€ffec{iven$s, tho UCT and TRC would b€ 1.73 ar
Beneflt
$
$
$
$
3(
4i
3(
E(
Ref.
Adminiatratlon
lncentiver
il,122
Coat
and lnrt llation t
I
P
xt
Ref.Net Benefit
601,162
t
$
$
Benefitt
t
304,O47
334,.052
Non-Utility Rebates/lncantives
Benefits
Total Electric Savings
'10% Cr€dit Povuer
Blll Savlngs
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings
366,676
6,1E9,330 $
$
SrYlng.
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kwh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kVVh)
B
NUI
NEB
s
A
Te3t
tltility Cost Test
R€source Cost Te3t
Ratepayor lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
Reeource Cost Test
Ratopa)rer lmpad Measur€ Test
t ilityoGtT6t
CostTost
lPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff [rlo. 1
Residential New Construction
Segment: Residential
2020 Program Resulb
Notes:
2012 lntemational Energy Conservation Code (IECC) with am€ndments adoptod in ldaho in 2014.
of Cost-Effectiveness Results
Benofit3.nd Costs lncluded in Each Test
= S'NTG
=(A+NUl +Nl
NTG
=S-NTG
=B+l+NUl+
for Levelized Calculations
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((l + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Escalation Rate
Net-to-Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/kwh
Line Losses
$
$
$
Benefit
7i
1,Ot
7:
7',
Cost lnputs Ref.
Prog ram Admlnlstration $83,704
lncentive6 $
473,5(N
Measu'e Equipment and lnltallation (!ncremental Paiticiprnt CGt)$782,285
!
P
lul
Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Participant Cost Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cosl Test
Ratopayer lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
Benefit Ref,
Other Benefits
$
730
$ 1,140,182
$
$
$
731,230
804,353
123
Non-Utility RebateVlncentives
Benefits
Total Electric Savings
10% Credit Power
6/.9,522
1 1,359,554
Bll! Savings
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings
Savings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kwh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (klrrt)
B
NUI
NEB
s
A
lPc.E.21-{t4
Response to Staff llo. I
Shade Tree Project
Segment: Residential
2020 Program Results
Cost lnouts Ref.
Program Administration $
3
28,.f90
Prosram lncentivec !
P
lt
Total Ljtilitv Cost 3 28.490
teasurc EouiDmant and lnat lletion (lnciementel Particioant CGt)3
of Cost-Effectiveness Resu lts
N/A
and Costs lncluded in Each Test
= S'NTG
=(A+NEl)*
NTG)+NEB
= S'NTG
N/A
$
$
$
for Levelized Calculationr
Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Rate
(NTG)
NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/kwh
Losses
Net Benefit lnputs Ref.
Resource Savlngs
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kWh) -
frcm 2013 - 2016 plantings
Cumulalive Energy (kwh) -
fiom 2020 plantings
NPV Cumulative Energy (kwh)
10olo Credit (No(hwest Power Act)
52,662
0
0$
$
Total Electric Savings $
Partlcipant Bill Savings
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings $
Other BenGfits
Non-Energy lmpacts - Therms
Non-Energy Benefits
$t
S
A
B
NEI
NEB
lmpac{ Measure Test
Cost Test
Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
tPc-E-21-o4
R$ponse to Staff No. 1
Simple Steps, Smart Savings
Segment: Residential
2020 Program Results
Notos:
NEBS include the NPV of water savings from low-llow showerheads and clothes washers.
of Gost-Effectlveness Results
Benefit
3
and Costs lncluded in Each Test
= S'NTG
=(A+NUl+Nl
NTG
= S'NTG
=B+l+NUl+
$
$
$
3{
for Levelized Calculations
Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + fssa151;sn)) - 1
Rate
(NTG)
NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rat€/kwh
Losses
Cost lnputs Ref.
Program Administration $69,862
Program lncentives I 29,279
Total Utilitv Cost $ 99,141
I
P
MMeasurc Eouioment and Installation (!ncromontal P.tticlp.nt CoBt)$28,767
Net Benefit lnputs Ref.
Resource Savlngs
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kWh) 'l4E,4u
NPV Cumuhtive Energy (kWh) 1,439,314 $
10% Credit (Northwest PowerAd) $
77,481
7,74E
Total Electric Savings $85,229
Particip.nt Bill Savings
NPV Cumuhtive Participant Bill Savings $1't7,145
Other Benefits
Non-Utility Rebatedlncenlives $
3Non-Enarov Benefits 2:,/,.281
s
A
B
NUI
NEB
Test
Utility Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
rPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff IIo. I
Weatherization Ass ista nce for Qual ified C ustomens
Segment Residential
2020 Program Results
of Cost-Effectlveness Results
$
$
$
't(
3:
'l(
and Co6ts Included an Each Tost
= S'NTG
=(A+NUl +Nl
NTG
= S'NTG
N/A
Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Rate
Net-tccross (NTG)
NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/k\M
Cort Inputs Ref.
Program Admlnistration
CAP Aoencv Pavmentr
t
3
115,521
654.96t
P
OH
t
Total tftlllty Coet
Accrualc/Revenal of Ganyover Dollarr
$
$
Tto,45
615,092
Tot l Prog6m Expenses 3 1.385.577
ldaho Power lndir6ct Overhead Erponsc Alloc.tion - 2.378%$32,949
Addltlontl State Fundlno s !12-71e
Test
lmpac{ Measure Tesl
Cost Test
Resourca Cosl Test
Cost Tsst
Resourca Cost Test
lmpac{ Measure Test
Cost Test
Net Beneflt lnputs Ref.
Recource Savings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kWh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (k\M)
10% Credit (Northwest PorcrAct)
218,611
3,358,364 $
$
160,706
16,071
Total Electric Savings $176,779
Partlclp.nt Blll Savings
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings $307,429
Other Benelitr
Non-Utility Rebatesfl ncentives
Non-Electric Benefits
Heath & Safety
Repair
Other
t
$
$
$
1 52,1 E9
4E
44,62E
Non-Enerqy Benefits 3 r96.865
s
A
B
NUt
NEB
ila&r:
tuingg updrEd in 2&m and bmed on t billing 8n il!,sL d0te 201&2018 utdrcrtsa$on proirds.
Program oos&,oilbcihronlss hootporaod kldro Putfe tJuruco Conmla$oe oPUC) rf rloomrlonddimE fom ese GNR-E-12-01. Reoommcrhfpm irdlde:
No q"&mqportiipsrt oost!. Cosblhovn apliom the DOE stabnoailpddor GsilEIlcc program
tFc-E-21-(t4
Response to Staff tlo. I
Weatherization Solutions for Eligible Customers
Segment Residential
2020 Program Results
of Cost-Effectiveness Resu lts
Benefits and Costc lncluded ln E ch Tert
= S'NTG
=(A+NUl +Nl
NTG
=S*NTG
for LevelLed Calculations
Rate
Nominal WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + E566151;on1; - ,
Rate
(NTG)
NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/kwh
Losses
Notes:
Savings updated in 2020 and based on a billing analysis ofthe 20,16-2018 wBatherization projects.
Program cost-effectiven€ss incorporated ldaho Public Utilities Commission (IPUC) staff recommendations from case GNR-E-12-01 . Recommendations include:
Claimed 100% of savings; increased NTG to 100o/o; added a 10% conservalion preference addef h6alth, safety, and repair non+nergy benefits, and allocation of indirec{ or
No customer participant costs.
$
$
$
Benefit
N/A
Cost lnputs Ref.
Program Admlnlstration
Weatherlzatlon LLC Pavments
$
3
36,561
172,154
P
OH
M
Total Utllltv Cost 3 208.715
ldaho Power lndlrect Overhead Expense Allocation - 2.37E%$
3
4,963
Additional State Fundino
Net Benefit lnoute Ref.
Recource Savingr
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kwh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kWh)
10% Credit (Northwost PorverAct)
47,360
658,102 $
$
2E,3E5
2,839
Total Electric Savings t 3'.t,24
Partlclpant Bitl Savlngs
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings $57,901
Other Benelits
Non-Utility Rebates/lncentives
Non-Elec{ric Benefits
Heath & Safety
Repair
Other
$
$
$
$
1 1,239
't,026
6,'t84
Non-Enerov Benefits 3 18.'149
s
A
NUI
NEB
Test
Cost Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratopayer lmpac-t Measure Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpacl Measure Test
tPc.E-21-04
Response to Staff No. 1
Commercia! Energy-Savings Kits
Segment Commercial
2020 Program Results
Net Benefit lnouts Ref.
Retource Savings
2020Annual Gross Energy (k\A/h) 25E,36E
NPV Cumulative Energy (kWh) 2,363,048 $ '12E,900
10% Crodit (Northw€st Pofler Act) $ 12,890
Total Electric Savings $ 1,01,790
Paillcipant Bill Savings
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings 128,U3
Other Benefits
Non-Utility Rebates/lncentives
Non-Enerov Benefits 10d.,672
$
$
$
s
A
NUI
NEB
of Cost-Effectiveness Results
tn
= S, NTG
=(A+NUl +Nl
NTG
= S'NTG
N/A
$
$
$
1"
)t
12
for Levellzed Calculations
Discount Rate
Nominal WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Escalation Rate
Net-to-Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/kWh
Notes:
NEBs include PV of periodic bulb replacement costs for direct install LED bulbs and water, waste water, and therm savings from water saving devices.
Cost lnputs Ref.
Program Admanistration t
t
103,678
Prooram lncentivas I
P
lt
Total Utllitv Gost $103,678
toasurc EouiDment and lnstallation (lncremental Pailcipant Cost)$
Test
Utility Cost Test
Resourcs Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact Moasure Test
Utility Cost Test
Cost Test
lPc-E-21-{t4
Response to Staff No. I
Custom Projects
Segmenh lndustrial
2020 Program Results
Net Benefit lnputs Ref.
Resource Savings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kwh)
NPV Cumuhtive Energy (kwh)
10olo Credit (Northwest PowerAc{)
94,005,717
1,04E,711,M6 $
$
5E,874,1 00
5,8E7,4't0
Total Electric Savings $ 64,761,510
Participant Bill Savlngs
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings $ 37,669,.f95
Other Benefits
Non-Utility R€batssy'lncentives
Non-Enerov Benefils
$
3 2.310.595
s
A
B
NUI
NEB
of Cost-Effectlveness Resu lts
Bonefib and Corts lncluded in Each Test
=S-NTG
= (A+ NUI + Nt
NTG
=S*NTG
=B+l+NUl+
for Levelized Calculations
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Escahtion Rate
Net-to.Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/kWh
Losses
Benefit
$
$
$
5E,E]
67,01
58,8;
Notes:
Energy savings are unique by project and are review€d by ldaho Power engineering staff or third-party consultants. Each projec.t must complete a certification inspeclion.
program cost+fiectiveness. Green Rewind savings are induded in the sec{or cosl-effec{ivene$.
Non+nergy benefits/impacts on a $/kwh for each end+se. Based on 2019 impacl evaluation of other C&l programs.
Cost lnputs Ref.
Program Administration
Proqram lncentives
3
3
2,137,551
1s.621.845 I
P
M
Total Utllitv Gost t t8.050.396
Measure Eouioment and lnctallatlon (lncremental PartlclDant Cost)3 39.166.900
Test
Cost Tesl
Utility Cost Test
Total Resourc€ Cost Test
Rat€payer lmpacl Measure Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Utility Cost Test
Cost T€st
rPc-E-21-04
Respome to Staff [to. I
New Construction
Segment Commercial
2020 Program Results
Notec:
Non+nergy bonefits/impac'ts on a $&lMt for each end-use. Based on 2019 impac't evaluation.
of Cortffiectveness Results
Benefltr end Coet3 lncluded an E ch Tert
S-NTG
(A+NUl +Nl
S'NTG
B+1+NUl+
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real (1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - I
Escalation Rate
Net-to-Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivig
Customer Segment Rate/kWh
Lossee
$
$
$
Benefit
8,0!
't 0,9!
E,0!
11 7t
Coct lnouts Ref.
Program Admlnlstratlon $421,337
1.962.845Prooram lncentlvea s I
P
xt
Total tlUlitv Cost 2.383.983
tearurn Eouloment end lnrtalletlon flncrementrl Partlcloant Goct)3 3.75,,.274
Ref.Beneflt
Non-Utility Rebatos/l ncentivss
Beneflta
$
$
s 7,74,477
8,097,676
9,907,444Total Elec{ric Savings
l0% Credit
Blll Savlngs
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings
14,565,936
141,271,009 $
Savlngs
2020 Annual Gross Enorgy (kl,rh)
NPV Cumuhtive Enorgy (kVvh)
B
NUI
NEB
s
A
T.3t
CostT€st
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Teat
Ratepayer lmpact Measur€ Te3t
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact MeasuB Test
lPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff No. 1
Retrofits
Segment: Commercial
2020 Program Results
Net Benefit lnputs Ref.
Resource Savings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (k\M)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kwh)
10% Credil (Northwesl PowerAcl)
20,965,2 t 5
203,335,656 $
$
11,655,243
1,165.524
Total Electric Savings t 12,820,768
Participant Bill Savings
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings I 11,141,114
Other Benefits
Non-Utility R€bates/lncentives
Non-Energy Benefts
t
$3.380.947
s
A
B
NUt
NEB
of Results
Benefit
11,61
16,2(
11,61
$
$
$
rnd Costs lncluded in Each Test
= S'NTG
(A+NUl +Nl
NTG
= S'NTG
B+l+NUl+
for Levelized Calculations
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real (('l + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 'l
Escalation Rate
Net-to-Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segment Rate/kwh
Line Losses
Notes:
Measure inputs ftom Evergreen Consulting Group or the Technical Reference Manual prepared by ADM Associates, lnc. unless otheruise noted.
Non-energy benefitsr/impacts on a $/kwh for each end-use. Based on 2019 impact evaluation.
Cost lnputs Ref.
Program Administration
Proqram lncentives
$
3
994,706
2.592-57',|I
P
M
Total Utilitv Cost 3 3.5e7.277
teasure Eouioment and lnstellation {lncremental Particioant Costl 3 10.989.726
Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpac{ Measure Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Cost Tesl
tPc-E-2lfl
Response to Staff ilo. 1
Small Business Direct lnstall
Segmen[ Commercial
2020 Program Results
Notes:
Energy savings are unQue by pmjec{ and are revievued by a third-party implomonter
Non+nergy benefits/impac,ts on a $/kWh for each end-use. Based on 2019 impacl evaluation of other C&l programs.
of Cost-Effectlveness Resu lts
S'NTG
(A+NUt+Nt
S'NTG
$
$
$
3a
$r
3l
for Levellzed Calculations
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real (('l + WACC) / ('l + Escalation)) - 1
Escahtion Rate
Net-to-Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Customer Segmenl Rate/kWh
Cost lnputs Ref,
Program Admlnbtratlon t 339,830
3 !
P
lt
Totrl Utllltv Coct I 339,830
teasuro Eouipment and lnttalhtlon (lnctemental P.tticip.nt CoGt)E
Net Beneflt lnoutg Ref.
Reeource Savlngr
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kwh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kWh)
10% Crodit (Northwost Po,uerAc{)
760,260
6,1E4,935 $
$
352,s06
3s,251
Total Electric Savings t 387,757
Participant Blll Savlngs
NPV Cumuhtive Participant Bill Savings I 330,703
Other Beneflts
Non-Utility ReMes/lncentives
Non-Enerov Benefits
t
$159,41
s
A
B
NUI
NEB
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpacl Measure Test
Utility Cost Test
Total Resource Cost Tesl
Ratepayer lmpaci Measure Test
Cost Test
lPc-E-21.04
Response to Staff No. 1
lrrigation Efficiency Rewards
Segment: lrrigation
2020 Program Results
of Cost-Effectlveness Results
Benefrt
't 3,6(
6E,9(
13,6(
lnd Cost3 lncluded In Each Tert
S-NTG
(A+NUl +Nl
NTG
S'NTG
+++
Discount Rate
Nominal (WACC)
Real ((1 + WACC) / (1 + Escalation)) - 1
Escalation Rate
Net-to,Gross (NTG)
Minimum NTG Sensitivity
Cuslomer Segment Rat€y'kwh
Notes:
Energy savings are combined tor projec{s under the Custom and Menu program. Savings under each Custom project is unique and individually calculated and ass$sed.
For Custom option, Non-en€rgy benefits including yield, hbor, and other benefits reported by th€ customer. For Menu option, NEBS from RTF
Green Rewind savings are included in the sector cost-effectiveness.
2020 cost-effoctiveness ratios include evaluation expenses. lf evalution expenses wer€ removed from the program's cost-€fbctiveness, th6 UCT and TRC would be 4.030 €
$
$
$
Gost lnouts Ref
Program Administration
Proqram !ncentives
t 432,856
2.968.817t I
P
xt
Total tltllltv Coet 3.tOt.673
teasura EouiDment and lnstallation (lncremental Particioant Cost)3 16.424.199
Benefit Ref
Non-Utility Rebates/lncentives
Benetits
$
I 8,'152,985
Total Electric Savings
't3,600,566
14,960,644
12,E47,823
143,345,570 $
Savings
2020 Annual Gross Energy (kWh)
NPV Cumulative Energy (kWh)
Bill Savlngs
NPV Cumulative Participant Bill Savings B
NUI
s
A
Test
Utility Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
Ratepayer lmpact Measure Test
Cost Test
Resource Cost Test
Ratepayor lmpac{ Measure T€st
Utility Cost Test
2.
9.C096
w cc(Andtls
Fh.ndrl EsHor
SummLlnr L6
tPoE 2Laf.+oB b Si.i tlo. I
2@l
Av!
0
0
0
1
2
3
4
3
5
7
8
9
10u
xt
l:}
t'a
15
t6tl
18
19n
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30lltt
33
3{
35
36
37
38
3tio
a1
a2
434
as4
TID B..dlld lylifit
cqxxia
o.qD€t
o,m4.,
0.@457
oqDa66
o.qrxr6o.drr6
oIIXrt6
o(Eo70.617
[e-mail]
0,qE51
0.otE62
O(XIE il
0.685
o.G96o.ffi11
O(ur2'a
0.q)637
o.ffi50
O.GX64
o.ffi-r8
0.drt2
o.drro6
0.q!r2t
o.qD735
0.G)752
0.@768
omrSa0.duD
odxtl7
0.qD8ilil
0.qt08s2
oqb87o0,@
0.@97
0.m926
0,m945
o.(8 65
0,qD$s
odrrxr
o.@rf,1
o.oloa8
o,0lgr1
omlo93o.mff
o.611t9
o,otlc3
um7
uNa
atNaUMd&1q@
qt,M
q@
q1M
UM
4M
4@
4@
qre
gt@t
UN
di&
4Nsr&otmqlN
Itm
fi&s&
glM
dtrc
dlM
dtM
qN
4NqlM
dtru
,tro
&1N1orc{1rcgl&
?1rc
?1ru
dlN
dtM
3trcsm
?l6t
qlre
?t6qN
glM
ffiyE6tmt7 7W71asiar 7/6aH
srala 7/6re tustm 7wwsi& T,&rd6& 7WW
6r& t,@lD
61@ lt@tuGtrc 7WWsr/@ ,@d
6IM WM6rm l@fs6r@ l@worm 7@tu
stmt ftw w
8i& 7/@M@tre ?/@hsr& Twfa
@16 7@ffi
4l& 7,@hsl@ 7r@&st@ t/@M
srre ,r@k
arm twwDt@l flwtu6t& Tlww
Dt& 7/@&
6'M TINW6i& TtWlE6tm 7,mw
wN ftwtu
Gt& fwwGI,fr 'IMld6& Tt1ffik
6rdr nml 1u6rE2 7r@tu6i@ 't@frst& Tlww
st& TlwM
6tm lwle6IM ?WW6i/ilt3&tu
6!rc 'Wfu6im ?r6umidr ?mr k
6!m TWfa
strc 7rcwd
6t& 7wffist/G 7,6b
CAPACITY
Et .ltlclty
rr:r.-?.rE!rfit lE GEtriFrltiIt7rlt,trElrll|r:"I
E '.il]I|FFIrr.rE:rlli-ll
IliErtl.trt:rllrtt:ll1@tt!F?:!trllllr,tr
o.qrult
o.qrl28
o.qru:rr
o,qEl6a
o6D910.dr:r,,
oor3t5
0.lDtr,itooltoi,
0.qr!l32
0.@L52
ool493
o.qrrs2a
oot5lt6
oollltg
5 o.qrrzr
5 (Iqrt6s6
$ oqE69t
4N
4N
ttm
qM
4m
ANIum
q@
6Na
6m
ilffiqtm
qm
ar@qlN
0mt
dlffi
di/fr
6tEw
atm
srre
6lruDwNl
6m
6tm6Nastm
6iat
wmNMs!aD6!m
st&tsi&6rm
MU7Wk
?ffiH
7l@tufm?bTMlU
7Wk
,WVftwawIMfu
Ttmw
twwtmk,WID7rffitu
tmffi7,mb,Wd
Avoided Capacity Estimate 2019
Program Max MW
Avolded Capacity ($/kW) -
Efective load Carrying Capacity -
Avoided Capacity w/ ELCC
Dlscount Rate -
Value Shifted Energy ($/kwh)
Hourc of events
390.00
Srzr.rg
93%
5tt2.7L
7.t2%
20.00 s/MWh
50
s
Benefits
(El (F)(Dl(cl
2019
2020
202!
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
L70
t70
L70
L70
L70
L70
L70
L70
L70
L70
L70
L70
t70
t70
L70
t70
L70
L70
L70
L70
s19,628,139
s19,629,139
S19,628,139
S19,628,139
s19,629,139
s19,628,139
S19,628,139
S19,628,139
S19,628,139
s19,629,139
s19,628,139
s19,629,139
s19,629,139
s19,628,139
s19,628,139
s19,529,139
S19,628,139
S19,628,139
s19,628,139
sso.33
Sso.sg
ss0.33
Sso.ss
ss0.33
ss0.33
ss0.33
Sso.ss
Sso.33
sso.33
sso.33
sso.33
ss0.33
ss0.33
Sso.sg
Sso.ss
ss0.33
ss0.33
sso.33
s19,628,139
s19,528,139
s19,629,139
s19,628,139
s19,528,139
S19,628,139
s19,628,139
s19,628,139
s19,628,139
S19,G28,139
s19,628,139
s19,628,139
S19,628,139
s19,629,139
s19,628,139
S19,628,139
s19,628,139
s19,628,139
S19,G28,139
s19,628,139
Def icit
(post B2H)
(MW)
DR MW
Capacity
Total Avoided
Capacity& Shifted
E nergy
Max
S/kwYea r Levelized Total
Nominal
NPV
5392,562,180
5206,01s,407
s392,s62,780
5206,01s,407
Non-incentive Program Expenses
lncentives
2020 Actual Expense
Estimated Varlable Credit:
Totel
lfrlg.Uon Pak R0nrds
S282,oo
56,124,937
FhxPek
s92,031
s450,450
ACCool GrGdlt
s42&611
s336,410
Totel
$803,118
s6,gu,797
$6,40l,ltz
$2,893,7ls
$542,4E1
s2VS,7L2
5765,020
$o
$7,7L4,913
s3,L@,A7
Sg,ilrrtz?$8r8,l93 s766,O2O $lorS+3ao
Page 29 of30
tE tkno&1dvorlp/blcCtedla
kw Hn S/kWh Fr6or
8!!e25 /A 0.98 9516
316898 la 0.14t 95t6
S755,033
9,138,681 3At99.rr5
f,o:Paal
Admh & Mrrkctrg s 91,071.q'
s 960.00Mn drlr
SGryiBr
lhcEnthrss
'35,9a$vG.?gew.,lrymmthoEdn.ft/tbvcltil4,.,/8hr4@trs-t2,wt/,l?e1,.nE xi.rdtwrbbbf,.dft)
ftilbllP..tnil.t
rlftnln
Mr*rUtE
Mrtcfuls
sqvlc.r
lCCmlC!.dt
Admh
OdErE.p.rs
trrrbftlt
Srwle3
lncanthca
s 8446e.38S 1,192.8s ss,009.51S 138f03.91
Tord[ I 10,a!+3lll
70,5Ut
L4Pa7
{53r30J cr€dlt d',r. to.csountlry aorircuon
3%,491
336;410
765,t80
s
szraru
. Esthnatxld Vdttohb Cred ltt
lW Hn S/kwh F.stor
35300 {8 0.16 LWX
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
GASE NO. IPC-E-21-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
ATTACHMENT TO REQUEST NO. 3
TO
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF
lPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff No. 3
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
TNTEREST ON DSM RTDER (ORDER #29026)2il201
IDAHO
September
October
November
Beo Balance
(1,787,616.47)
311,044.66
1,109,022.27
1,548,495.61
2,948,642.56
5,697,137.78
7,358,921.72
8,168,754.56
9,086,732.18
7,388,586.05
8,502,754.26
6,795,905.87
Endino Balance
311,044.66
1,109,022.27
1,548,495.61
2,948,642.56
5,697,137.78
7,358,921.72
8,168,754.56
9,086,732.18
7,388,586.05
8,502,754.26
6,795,905.87
8,839,261.59
Averaqe Balance
(738,285.91)
710,033.47
1,329,758.94
2,249,569.09
4,322,890.17
6,528,029.75
7,763,939.14
8,627,743.37
8,237,659.12
7,945,670.16
7,649,330.07
7,817,583.73
Ganying Charoe
(1,230.48)
1,183.39
2,214.60
3,747.62
7,204.82
10,880.05
12,939.73
14,379.57
13,729.43
13,242.78
12,748.88
13,029.31
Rate
December
Jan,202A
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
August
2.000/o
2.000/o
2.000/o
2.000/o
2.000/o
2.00V0
2.00Y0
2.000/o
2.000/o
2.000/o
2.00olo
2.000/0
104,069.70
Page 1 of 1
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
GASE NO. IPC-E-21-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
ATTAGHMENT TO REQUEST NO. 7
TO
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE
FIRST PRODUGTION REQUEST OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF
tPc-E-2'1-04
Response to Staff No. 7
cc
W0 ilm$or
158
nzs0f,u
wo task Disbursement Desc Sum of Total AmountDescrin
Erpcnr ADYISORALTOCATIOTI
BEl{EFltS FRoX 232016
69773
2O2O ADVISOR ALLOCATION
BENEFITS FROM 232016
775
1,071
GREE CoRnECTlol{S
EIIERGY IOUSE GALLS +
IUIRA DAIA TRA]ISFER LID
TISGELTAI{EOUS TAXES
ENERGY HOUSE CALLS +
(blank)
(blank)
Sales Tu, NorrP.O.
SOW 2. BILL PRINT MONTHL
2018 ALEXANDER CLARK IIW
(626)
2,292
12
1,239
270
0t*rdurd GATE COIIITRACIOR SERVIGES
HOTE ElIERGY EFFIGIE]ICY IECIIIIOI
SOW 1 - ENERGY HOUSE CALI
ENERGY HOUSE CALLS. SOW1
4,770
2,179
Grrnd Totrl 21"O5
Page 1 of3
tPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff No. 7
k16r!6 e!tr r& ffi@ @t $lMffireur EES ,!m* &$ &!j2 2& kffi srMffil@M. @r ilmr!I tal o!.lffi*lp ,e urMm M@froffihu[rmoft6,lmU0 uji2 ,N offilm e, &rMcE u dE Mtroffih Ur&m MffiMh6@U!!! &r OffiF @ M &mttt & ffi offih 42 slmoa E Mu &mffi offih M $!mm Mu
ffih lu6 & offia & s'MEfrmaEmil &ffih u s@ffimahil[16aeoffiFM$lmffiMrl@mnl)2e kffi itn, Ilm*ffiffire2W Effi Dffi€ffiffirea O! MA!{snc&@n&q@M ilfrffi 2rn, Dt&*ffiffiuiu ffiA!!!&offiFMmm@d@M&mrS si!2 2N offih mtr Mmt{ Mu offiIm l!7rl rlMm ffiE ffi&rl!n erir fi &r fr* offi@ M 0& &eD!r O!tr offih $ r&m ffiU MmffilF meft!o &ilt 7M offih ul mm @Coffih at @m &tc Mmffih @6ilBtrffih@ffi@ulo$ufr&toffiF@@6@mt$ En: z& offilF ry ffim wC e@rI&rffi*&.@ffi@ffi@ulastur&offihqmrm@ffi&mfrOrnffioffih!4mmsaec
ilr&offi+@semts &fi ffih u MffilildMailfl qffi\o
!o &! offi@ & ffixmHawrMr o& $Mtros S!tr offih mrmm ffits!!!l@0ffi&il@&ffiUMm!E sllr !t! l& offiF tU @ ffi &Oh!f, Ern 2,?a oMh 6t&ffi ffiU!r! l& offiaE dr srmm fiffil& offils: €lmm ffiUffih M e!s Mtr M offih u 6lmoft w[ MffiE&40iuq&Gs@&t& srm&ffirr.m s@dI Onr W offih 0 h@@ WE Mffito e(r offib @ ffi0 Oni 7W offih &lmm s @u frffiffihd 6 6tmaD Heu@ offih em!!r & offiF !U slMm @ effihS@@6ffiUffih &!mm !6 m[ @mh@ ru ffionsurwnr.uil mffimffiffi @ffiUt^msl'rufi 6110 & st@d &!0 ertr ,. &r eM U mMiltffi&LHo, Nll&m rMr t!&r'rm 0!7!6 &te &tu t,:s kW U .lwmilhflhleH!, o&llIilm lee ffiprx Srit ,N offih al7 Smm d W@E &8ftls Etrr offih u 6!s sr, ffih sldEtrtmdffid @seruoffiF&b@wbfi ofi M ffih 5'effidrffid & @M6 &r offitu slMmdEHEil!i oil, & ffih 4 5tmffiE!ffiuil ffi&a &tr offilil s 5@Efrff!ffiila @ro &
tu offih @u!n&offilr.uh@iE ffilF @fts &iil !ffih slMiaoffitu o m@u?l2B m@ &lmffiIarffi( 0e frlr! ffimr! &! kffi &!t stMwrttrM( @OlMh MM UN6E Mffio!ffihr&rMffiMW!o utf 2ffi orffih @ M-fr @ ffi dtrMu emtsst?ffiffiI&HtMmMM@ffiraExr[ll.eoffiF(mmMffi @ ffih u @oh ?r@[ &ffi!!!&rffihu@fi sr ,& offih @m $@[ &m
s 0r offi* rtn u ffi 7,@u emw offih @mffi+UrmtEUo[muemr$ 6tr ,& offib u rmm fim!o onr fr & offitF ffiufr &!tr r& ffih s mMarlE[uiloffi* u MffiErffimaoffih ma@{ooffih @mmnMaffit mo!ffih 4 mm M 6!6 '@0u tuffiio Mn frM oiffih 7r mrm u w6 7ffiu Mmoffih ti ,trlMih M ru ffimw olffih 7tffiv ffibfrrs E![ ,& offih Drmafr!I l@ Offih r, ,rr&m @ ffi ,tr@u &mM ol,lffitd te,mffi
!!! .@ offitu o D!&aE tlt@u emoffi* Dtmmoffih st Mm n@E
rt&!trffioffihuffiem @ ffih Dmmffihr6EroUMmrs qnl w ffib E@mffitu @E efrt$ 6!tr @ offih u Drmm!J! l@ offi* i6 ,a*@U Mmffih Ermxfo!ffih s! Drmffiilrtffi.il* 6 Mtro!g e!fl orffih DrmlmMallmrMn ofi 0m @ao M2M offit.r Ua hrmffidIffirffiiloffitu il! DrM}M!ffirrMrmil 0s 0m @trots &n? W ffi@ {lltr DlMftffi @ !M
D t& ffiffi {lS ttrMeffi u @ mA M!o Ertr !il t& 6ffih 4 srmm u@u!r bn M offih er slmm $ffi[ &omM offih E,mm @ ffilri ls ffi* (r, a@m U@U umtu offihffi* tu 5@m U,mV Mm6 Snr $ &t offi*fr Eni ffi ffi* r! o@omtB Dlf t$ &r ffih1l2ffi offih O! slmmoffil$ M lE ffiE &mr,:m. orffi* ofi o mmotffih M Ormom G lMU M{mrr ,e orffih d 6lMffi @ ul6 @E
lPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff No. 7
.lMrm6xmuilffi!maMrdil
@lmilffimrffiurffiu,lmdrHraE{
l.f,mffiNE,'d'lmmM6ffiarBr!@M6M'HN
ffiuqr&MumeuremeffiffiDmemeureM&
M[qr&MduMUsr&0Mu
^md&qiMM&M&qreMuMU TMffiU
ffl!mdffiBx
En M?!ffiB,@!mrmBr!
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-21-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
ATTACHMENT TO REQUEST NO. 13
TO
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF
IPGE-21+4
Response to Stafi No. 13
j
'ttd
&8ff
ffiffiffitrd ffiffimffffiffi5 ffiffm ,id&b li|ridaa**$h
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
GASE NO. IPC.E.21.O4
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
ATTACHMENT TO REQUEST NO.14
TO
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF
lPc-E-21-04
Response to StaffNo. 14
@ta7:6 ill 2-d 3.131 !.14 7XXS5.6*l 2B stG
Mna*oill 2.Oa 3t$!.is sr
@xa?:oill 318 3.t6
dlato ill !.02 3ffi 3.il5
@!64:O ill t.1D !!s 2H !rli
3,t6 7rr1a7.@il1 3.2$3,111 s
@ia?:@ ill l.is 7Brl6@il1 !xr
t@1oa@Nl 1,26 ,MO7:@il w
t@1af '@41 s.a lrs
ttu1sa@Nl 3.r&s
3,S l@1e $'@il|l,@ 7n1t2O7:@ tu !r17
78196.@il1 2.0n !i2!
3,G 7/r11!6'm rul !.4 2,S m@5:6il s
7&1e!.@ ill 2.5 w
@!65@ml !,24t ?0117 a.@tu|3,fr ftur!!@tu1 a.2N 9n
@!6 6& ill !,u7 ?nn1 e.6Nl 3.&7xulrr@*l !.r!5
toAr iofiill t!?a !.ts 3bi !t&
ta16a.d tul !:U l.tq tln !ai 3202
e2r15 9.d tul 3.124 s.214 3rs
3m7 !u slf,
3E
3r&
!.t5!
@t6g@wl !,01a 7dt75sill !d 7241aa.@ tul !24 &1/105.Otu1 3_6'3X
!*!.2&lt(
1,6 tfr !.s !r6
!,6 tdrT!$il1 trt !.s ua
ild172.mil1 t.217
L027 3,176 !,t!6 !26
3,6 ,/2t1t !.o Nl Lr&36
s.u7 38
Li6 3,S ,/pra5.@ ill ,,2D T{
!,u ,ztt!6m ill t.!!7 298 tili
3_@
ilr179.6il1 4,21 76116.@ tul t2n 2W lrs
3,6 ,utr!r.m PMI !.ts 810 3.@ ill 3.ffi !215
3.r$12l6
7Art6a@ruI LO',n217 5:mtul 3.19!!.ffi 3&!tBr
74$6 7.@ ryl !,r8 3.21 3St ltt
sb7 ft
t1u7 e'@il|3,1!7 ,agrl!.@ ill !.i6 et196otul 3.it !tr
1M72.@Nl 3,6 ,a&lt 3.m tul t.@ 2*!tt
7/1117!:mill 4,212 3.67 @rDlo:oill ,112 976
4.2f1 !.1$s5
h!175.mtu1 ,,297 ,/27116:m ill 3&s
3.ts 3r2i
2016 o 9 d
2017 6 0 0
2018 0 0 0
2019 o 0 2l
2020 4 0 19
s
aPc-E-2144
Response to Staff No. 14
l3!5 31'
m(asfiill LID zrerreorul a.i4
7dt1atfiNl 3.rz
hrnaat@il|!.r07 7Xa17lOill !.6
7t1ot7 a:&il| !,tO
zrlrzsmml lar
M/laG:Oill 26
..,'.'**l
Uffi?:d tul t1n
^.,-*lml!.2!7
l:6!&
!,ig
l.m
!.rt
!,r$@ra50 ill a.lta
!,to @1aa.6 ill !.f7
!,@
!.ti!!a &ritloill !.ff4 s6sill g
!.ts 610mtl !.6t d6affdl g
s.oh urdflssill s%s6aotl s
!tv !_vl tutastl Lfft s6dill g
3m Eiarstl sBtiltl s
!st 2fr s6r6ffl 6
,!rlaa:mrul 3.@ slr
U!rla7:0il1 lpla il
mdaM{l l6 @r7afi fll !s
ndats ill AB @1r7fidl !,1S
hsaisill LQ @t7l:m fll !,is
lPc-E-21-04
Response to Staff No. '14
Program Max MW
Avoided Capacity ($/kwl -
Efective Load Carrying Capacity -
Avoided Capacity d ELCC
Dlscount Rate -
Value Shifted Energy ($/kwhl
Hourc of events
Updated Value of Demand l2OL6-2020 ELCC of 85%l
s
390.00
s121.19
85Yo
s103.2s
7.t2%
20.00 s/MWh
60
Beneflts
(Al (Bl (Dl(cl
2019
2020
202t
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
203L
2032
2033
2034
2035
2035
2037
2038
t70
t70
L70
L70
L70
t70
L70
L70
L70
L70
t70
t70
L70
L70
L70
L70
L70
L70
L70
t70
S18,021,160
s19,021,160
S18,021,160
s18,021,160
S18,021,160
s19,021,160
S18,021,160
s19,021,160
S18,021,160
s18,021,160
$18,021,160
s18,021,150
s18,021,160
s18,021,160
s18,021,160
s18,021,160
S18,021,160
s19,021,160
s18,021,150
S18,021,1G0
s18,021,160
s18,021,160
S18,021,160
S18,021,1G0
s18,021,150
s18,021,160
s18,021,160
S18,021,160
s18,021,160
S18,021,1G0
s19,021,160
s19,021,160
s19,021,160
s19,021,160
s19,021,160
S18,021,160
s19,021,160
S18,021,160
s46.21
s45.21
s46.21
546.2L
546.zL
s46.2t
s46.21
$46.2L
546.21
s46.21
546.21
546.21
546.21
546.zL
546.21
$as.zr
546.2L
546.2L
s46.21
546.21160
Deficit
(post 82H)
(MW)
DR MW
Ca pacity
Total Avoided
Capacity& Shifted
Energy
Max
5/kwYearLevelized Total
Nominal
NPV
5360,423,r92
s1.89,148,677
5360,423,L92
51.89,148,677