Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180116Staff to Vote Solar 1-7.pdfSEAN COSTELLO DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720.007 4 (208) 334-03t2 IDAHO BAR NO. 8743 Street Address for Express Mail: 472 W . WASHINGTON BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5918 Attorney for the Commission Staff BBFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIBS COMMISSION R E CE IVED 2018 JAN l5 Pl{ Z: 25 iilrtli,) l*ljBLlCi, .: j il::li CCIJMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH NEW SCHEDULES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL GENERAL SERVICE CUSTOMERS WITH ON-SITE GENERATION CASE NO. IPC.E-17-13 STAFF'S RESPONSE TO VOTE SOLAR'S FIRST SET OF DATA REQUESTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission responds as follows to Vote Solar's First Set of Data Requests to Commission Staff. REQUEST NO. 1: Please provide all work papers to support all witness testimony you filed in this case, including but not limited to all underlying data and analyses supporting any numerical calculations, tables, and/or figures presented in your testimony. Please provide work papers in native format with formulas and links intact. To the extent that statistical software, other than Excel, was used in the development of your analysis please provide the log file, script and/or code written in the software language that was used, including the original data and output data. Please consider this an ongoing request and timely provide any additional work papers supporting additional testimony filed in this proceeding. STAFF'S PRODUCTION RESPONSE TO VOTE SOLAR 1 JANUARY 16,2018 STAFF RESPONSE NO. 1: As described on pages 10 and 11 of his testimony, Dr. Morrison used data provided by the Company through Staff s Production Request No. 8 in his analysis of net metering consumption patterns. Dr. Morrison's calculation of net metering consumption and billing under current rates and Staff s proposal can be found in cells E8789 through 8895 of the "Residential" tab in the spreadsheet "Net Metering Analysis_171228.xlsx." These cells have been highlighted in Blue. Dr. Morrison used data provided by the Company through Staff s Production Request No. 12 in his analysis of non-net metering consumption patterns. Dr. Morrison's calculation of non-net metering consumption and billing under current rates and Staff s proposal can be found in cells E8790 through E8825 of the "Regional Summary" tab in the spreadsheet "Non Net Metering Analysis 171228.xlsx." These cells have been highlighted in Blue. The data obtained from these spreadsheets, and used as the basis for Tables 7 and 2, and Figures 2,3, and 4 of Dr. Morrison's testimony can be found in the spreadsheet "TestimonyGraphics_l71228.xlsx." All three spreadsheets are included in File Name Idaho Power PR #1 - 3 on the CD produced with Staff s Response to Idaho Power Company's First Production Request. This response is sponsored by Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff Engineer, Michael Morrison, PhD. REQUEST NO. 2: On page 11, lines 7-12Mr. Morrison's Direct testimony refers to "2016 DSM avoided cost rates" that were used to estimate an average net metering customer's bill under Staffls proposal. a. Please provide a reference to the docket number in which those rates were developed and a reference to the Commission Order approving the rates. b. Please provide a copy of the filing(s) relied upon to obtain the 2016 DSM avoided cost rates used in Mr. Morrison's analysis. STAFF RESPONSE NO.2: a. Dr. Morrison used the 20i5 costs from the Company's 2013 IRP, Technical Index (Appendix C), Page 77, Docket No. IPC-E-I3-15. b. The Company's filing can be found at the Idaho Public Utilities Commission website: STAFF' S PRODUCTION RESPONSE TO VOTE SOLAR 2 JANUARY 16,2018 idaho.I I TE,CHNICAL INDEX.PDF. This response is sponsored by Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff Engineer, Michael Morrison, PhD. REQUEST NO. 3: Please confirm that Mr. Morrison's statements on page 9, lines 1 l-77 , regarding a customer's "share" of costs and whether customers "are subsidized" and on page 12, lines 5-T,regarding a "cost shift" are based on a comparison of a customer's bills to the average per-customer cost of service, rather than a customer's bills to that particular customer's cost of service or that customer's load contributions to the class loads used to allocate costs to the class in the cost of service study. STAFF RESPONSE NO. 3: As stated on page 4 of Dr. Morrison's testimony, the Company did not provide a cost of service study, so neither of these statements is correct. This response is sponsored by Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff Engineer, Michael Morrison, PhD. REQUEST NO.5: Please reference page 16, lines 17-20, and Table 2 of Mr. Morrison's Direct. a. Please identify the distribution plant component costs caused by the Net Metering Group's non-coincident peak load. b. Please identify the Net Metering Group's load at 7:00 pm on July 26,2016 (i.e., during the Non-Net Metering Group's Non Coincidental Peak hour). Please provide this in the same format as the data in Table 2 (which appears to be a per customer average). c. To the extent that net metering customers share distribution equipment with non-net metering customers, and the consumption characteristic that causes the Company to incur the cost of that shared distribution equipment is the peak load on the shared equipment, please explain why the net metering customer group's non-coincident peak, rather than the group's contribution to peak loading on the distribution equipment at issue, is an appropriate cost causation allocator. STAFF'S PRODUCTION RESPONSE TO VOTE SOLAR J JANUARY 16,2018 STAFF RESPONSE NO. 5: a. The Company did not provide a cost of service study in this case, and Staff did not perform such an analysis, so it is not possible to provide the information requested by Vote Solar. b. The average net metering load for the hour endingatT:00 pm on July 26th,2016 was 2.351 kW. c. Dr. Morrison disagrees that Vote Solar's proposed allocator premise is appropriate. In an idealized cost allocation scenario, the costs of distribution equipment would be allocated based on each group's contribution to the peak loading of each distribution plant component; however, because this would require a separate analysis of each component, this is not always practical. Outside of the idealized scenario discussed above, distribution plant is often allocated based on each class' share ofnon-coincident peak. This response is sponsored by Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff Engineer, Michael Morrison, PhD. REQUEST NO.6: Reference Direct Testimony of Stacey Donohue, page 5,lines 1-4. Please identify each of the capacity costs that are lowered by net metering customers. STAFF RESPONSE NO. 6: The Company did not provide a cost of service study in this case, so the specific capacity costs which are lowered are unknown. This response is sponsored by Idaho Public Utilities Commission, Technical Analysis Program Manager, Stacey Donohue, MPA. REQUEST NO. 7: Reference Direct Testimony of Stacey Donohue, page 10, lines 15-17. Please confirm (l) that the reference to a below average usage customer receiving a subsidy is based on a comparison between below average usage customer bills and the cost to serve a customer with an average load, and (2) that this statement is not based on a cost of service analysis for below average use customers as a class, or an analysis of the below average usage customer's actual contribution to class loads during the hours to which costs are allocated to the class as a whole in the cost of service studv. STAFF' S PRODUCTION RESPONSE TO VOTE SOLAR 4 JANUARY 16,2018 STAFF RESPONSE NO. 7: Neither of these statements were based on a cost of service study because the Company did not provide such a study in this case. This response is sponsored by Idaho Public Utilities Commission, Technical Analysis Program Manager, Stacey Donohue, MPA. JDated at Boise, Idaho, this /2 day of January 2018. Costello Deputy Attorney General Technical Staff: Michael Morrison Stacey Donohue i.umisc:prodreq/ipcelT.l3scmmsd response to Vote Solar prod req STAFF' S PRODUCTION RESPONSE TO VOTE SOLAR 5 JANUARY 16,2OI8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS I6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018, SERVED THE FOREGOING STAFF'S RESPONSE TO VOTE SOLAR'S FIRST SET oF DATA REQUESTS, N CASE NO. IPC-E-17-73, By MAILING A COpy THEREOF, POSTAGE PREPAID, TO THE FOLLOWING: LISA D NORDSTROM REGULATORY DOCKETS IDAHO POWER COMPANY PO BOX 70 BOrSE rD 83707-0070 E-MAIL: lnordstrom@idahopower.com com C TOM ARKOOSH ARKOOSH LAW OFFICES 802 W BANNOCK ST STE 9OO PO BOX 2900 BOISE ID 8370I E-MAIL : torn.arkoosh@arkoosh.com erin.ceci l@arkoosh. com ANTHONY YANKEL I27OO LAKE AVENUE LINIT 2505 LAKEWOOD OH 44107 E-MAIL: tony@y .net TOM BEACH CROSSBORDER ENERGY 2560 9TH STREET, SUITE 2I3A BERKELEY CA 94710 E-MAIL: tomb@crossborderenergy.com TIMOTHY E TATUM CONNIE ASCHENBRENNER IDAHO POWER COMPANY PO BOX 70 BOrSE iD 83707-0070 E-MAIL : ttatum@idahopower.com caschenbrenner@idahopower. com MATTHEW A NYKIEL ID CONSERVATION LEAGUE I02 S EUCLID #207 PO BOX 2308 SANDPOINT ID 83864 E-MAIL: mnykiel@idahoconservation.org ERIC L OLSEN ECHO HAWK & OLSEN PLLC PO BOX 6119 POCATELLO ID 83205 E-MAIL: elo@.echohawk.com KELSEY JAE NUNEZ LLC 920 N CLOVER DR BOISE ID 83703 E-MAIL: kelse),@kelseyj aenunez.com ELECTRONIC ONLY MICHAEL HECKLER michael.p.heckler@ gmail.com ZACK WATERMAN zack. waterman @,si erracl ub. orq CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ELIAS BISHOP AURIC SOLAR LLC 2310 s 1300 w W VALLEY CITY UT 84119 E-MAIL: elias.bishop@auricsolar.com ABIGAIL R GERMAINE DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY BOISE CITY ATTORNEY'S PO BOX 500 BOrSE ID 83701-0500 E-MAIL : agermaine@cityofboise.ors DAVID BENDER EARTHJUSTICE 3916 NAKOMA ROAD MADISON WI 53711 E-MAIL: dbender@earthjustice.org JOHN R HAMMOND JR FISHER PUSCH LLP PO BOX 1308 BOISE ID 83701 E-MAIL : j rh@fi sherpusch.corn RYAN B FRAZIER BRIAN W BURNETT KIRTON McCONKIE PO BOX 45120 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84I 1 1 E-MAIL: rfrazier@kmclaw.com bburnett@kmclaw.com PRESTON N CARTER DEBORAH E NELSON GIVENS PURSLEY LLP 601 W BANNOCK ST BOISE TD 83702 E-MAIL: prestoncarter@givenspursley.com den@ givenspursle),. com DAVID H ARKOOSH LAW OFFICE OF DAVID ARKOOSH PO BOX 2817 BOISE ID 83701 E-MAIL : david@arkooshlaw.com BRIANA KOBOR VOTE SOLAR 986 PRINCETON AVENUE S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 E-MAIL: briana@votesolar.org ELECTRONIC ONLY SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE wwi I son@snakeriveralliance.org NW ENERGY COALITION diego@nwenergy.orq DOUG SHIPLEY INTERMOUNTAIN WIND AND SOLAR LLC 1953 WEST 2425 SOUTH WOODS CROSS UT 84087 E-MAIL: doue@imwindandsolar.com SECRET CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE