Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170410IPC to ICL & Sierra Club 4-1 to 4-7.pdf3Iffi*. An IDACORP Company LISA D. NORDSTROM Lead Counsel I nordstrom@idahopower.com April 10,2017 VIA HAND DELIVERY Diane Hanian, Secretary !daho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington Street Boise, ldaho 83702 Re: Case No. IPC-E-16-24 Recovery of Costs Associated with North Valmy Power Plant- ldaho Power Company's Response to the Fourth Set of Data Requests of the Sierra Club and the ldaho Conservation League Dear Ms. Hanian: Enclosed forfiling in the above matter please find an originaland three (3) copies of ldaho Power Company's Redacted Response to the Fourth Set of Data Requests of the Sierra Club and the ldaho Conservation League. Also enclosed for filing are an original and three (3) copies of ldaho Power Company's Confidential Response to the Sierra Club and the ldaho Conservation League's Data Request No. 4-5. ln addition, enclosed are four (4) copies each of non-confidential and confidential disks containing information responsive to the Sierra Club and the ldaho Conservation League's data requests. Please handle the confidential information in accordanee with the Protective Agreement executed in this matter. Very truly yours, X"-P@ LDN:csb Enclosures 122 1 W. ldaho St. (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, lD 83707 Lisa D. Nordstrom LISA D. NORDSTROM (lSB No. 5733) ldaho Power Company 1221West ldaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, ldaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5825 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 lnordstrom@id ahooower.com Attorney for ldaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORIry TO INCREASE RATES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO RECOVER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE NORTH VALMY PLANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-16-24 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE COMES NOW, ldaho Power Company ("ldaho Power" or "Company"), and in response to the Fourth Set of Data Requests of the Sierra Club and the ldaho Conservation League to ldaho Power Company dated March 21, 2017, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 1 REQUEST NO. 4-1: Please refer to the Application at paragraph 1 1 (page 6). Please verify that ldaho Power Company is proposing, in this docket, to include within rates "all the investments made between the 2011 test year and July 31 ,2016." RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4-1: The statement contained in the Company's Application is correct; the levelized revenue requirement amount requested in this case includes actua! investments made at Valmy through July 31 ,2016. The response to this Request is sponsored by Matt Larkin, Revenue Requirement Manager, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 2 REQUEST NO. 4-2: Refer to Response to Staff Request No. 1, file "Attachment 8 - Response to Staffs Request No. 1_Exhibit 6 Workpapers_Fixed Costs (00207922xBCD5C)" tab "Valmy 10 Year budget." ("2015 to 2024 North Valmy Capita! Plan") a. Does this table represent Valmy total costs (irrespective of ownership), or IPC-share? b. lf this table represents IPC-share, does it represent whole Company, or ldaho share only? c. Provide a table of annual actual capital expenditures at Valmy Unit 1, Valmy Unit 2, and at any shared Valmy facilities from 2010 to the present day, broken down into Budget lD, Unit, and Project Title, as per the referenced worksheet (to be labeled "2010 to 2017 North Valmy Capital Spend") d. Refer to IPC Response to Staff DR 22 (Attachments 1 through 30). Provide a crosswalk between projects listed in Staff DR22 and (c) above ("2010 to 2017 North Valmy CapitatSpend"). RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4.2: a. Attachment I - Response to Staffs Request No 1_Exhibit 6 Workpapers*Fixed Costs.xlsx, tab "Valmy 10 Year budget," rows 1 through and including 273 are Valmy total project costs. Rows 275 through and including 339 are ldaho Power's share of the Valmy total costs. b. The ldaho Power-specific information contained in rows 275 through and including 339 reflects ldaho Power's total Company share, not the ldaho-allocated share. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 3 c. Please see the "Request No 4-2 c." tab in the Excel file, "2010 lo 2017 North Valmy Capital Spend," provided on the non-confidential CD. Please note that the cost information included in this Excel file is classified by ldaho Power work order number and not "Budget lD." Please see the "Request No 4-2 d." tab for the NV Energy Budget lD that corresponds to each ldaho Power work order number. d. PIease see the "Request No 4-2 d." tab on the Excel file, "2010 to 2017 North Valmy Capital Spend." The response to this Request is sponsored by Tom Harvey, Resource Planning and Operations Director, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 4 REQUEST NO. 4-3: Refer to IPC Response to Staff 22, attachment 28 ("Valmy 1 Utility MACT") a. Identify the date upon which this document was provided to IPC from NV Energy. b. ldentify the individuals (name, department) charged with the review of this document at lPC. c. Provide any written internal correspondence at IPC with respect to the review of this document. d. Provide any written correspondence with NV Energy with respect to the review of this document. e. ldentify the date upon which IPC provided approval to NV Energy to proceed with with the Valmy 1 Utility MACT project as scoped in this document. t. ldentify the date upon which final notice to proceed was provided to the buiber by NV Energy. g. What was the final cost of this project on a plant-wide basis? RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. a-3: a. The information from the Generation Business Case was presented to ldaho Power during the 2010 capita! budget meeting in summer 2010. b. The individuals that reviewed this information from ldaho Power were John Carstensen (Joint Projects Department) and the Joint Projects financia! analyst, who was in transition at the time and it is unclear who represented finance during that time. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 5 c. There was no written internal correspondence at ldaho Power with respect to review of this document. d. This project was part of the capital approval process that was approved by ldaho Power on February 4, 2011, via a budget approval letter to NV Energy, which is provided on the non-confidential CD. e. Please see the Company's response to the Sierra Club and the ldaho Conservation League's ("Sierra Club-lCL") Request No.4-3.d, above. f. The award date for the installation of the Valmy 1 Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology ("MACT") was September 26,2013. g. The final plant-wide project cost was $14,300,344. The response to this Request is sponsored by Tom Harvey, Resource Planning and Operations Director, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 6 REQUEST NO. 44: Refer to IPC Response to Staff 22, attachment 28 ("Valmy 1 Utility MACT"); refer specifically to page 5 of 6 ("Cost Benefits Calculations"). a. Verify that this document was provided to IPC by NV Energy. b. Please provide any workpapers or calculations or spreadsheet versions of this document that were either generated by IPC or provided by NV Energy. c. Describe what is represented by the line labeled "Duration of Derate \ hr" in this specific circumstance. Specifically, page 3 of 6 ("Assumptions") states that "derated [sic] is based on loss of the unit's ability to operate beyond the compliance date," so why does the analysis draw on a duration of derate at72OO hours for 2016- 2019? d. Describe what is represented by the line labeled "facility capacity factor." e. Provide the annual capacity factor of Valmy 1 from 2003-2013, inclusive. f. Describe what is represented by the line "probability of occurrence." g. State if IPC believes that the values of "probability of occurrence" as documented in this analysis were true and correct at the time it was developed. h. Describe what is represented by the line "Replacement Power Margin \ $/MWh." i. Produce any economic analysis of the Valmy 1 Utility MACT project conducted by lPC. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 44: a. The Generation Business Case was provided to ldaho Power in summer 2010 by NV Energy. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 7 b. No workpapers, calculations, or spreadsheets associated with the Generation Business Case were generated by ldaho Power or provided by NV Energy. c. The line labeled "Duration of Derate \ hr" is referencing the fact that the unit would not be able to operate past April 15, 2015, if the Dry Sorbent lnjection System (DSl) was not installed as per the Federal Utility MACT Rule. d. The "facility capacity factor" is the assumed capacity factor of the uniUplant in future years. Because this project was required by the implementation of a federa! rule, the plant operational assumption was set to 100 percent. e. Please see the table below. North Valmy Unit 1 Net Capacity Factor 2003 83.73o/o 2004 83.230/o 2005 80.58% 2006 66.85% 2OO7 76.210/o 2008 72.37% 2009 65.99% 2010 68.96% 2011 34.78o/o 2012 36.760/o 2013 55.70% f. The "probability of occurrence" is the probability the derate would occur. Because the unit would not be able to operate beyond April 15,2015, the probability of a derate was 100 percent. g. Yes. ldaho Power believes the values of the "probability of occurrence" documented in the analysis were true and correct at the time it was developed. h. The "Replacement Power Margin \ $/MWh" is the difference between the market price and the dispatch price of North Valmy. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 8 i. There was no other economic analysis conducted by ldaho Power with respect to the Valmy 1 Utility MACT project. The response to this Request is sponsored by Tom Harvey, Resource Planning and Operations Director, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVAT]ON LEAGUE - 9 REQUEST NO. 4.5:Refer to the ldaho Power Company's 2013 lntegrated Resource Plan ("lRP") a. ldentify the date upon which the final model runs in the 2013 IRP were conducted. b. For each of the nine portfolios examined in the 2013 lRP, provide the annual projected capacity factor for Valmy 1 through the full analysis period. c. For each of the nine portfolios examined in the 2013 lRP, provide the annual production cost (in $/MWh) for Valmy 1 through the full analysis period. d. For portfolios 3 through 9 in the 2013lRP, provide the annua! production cost (in $/MWh) for the combined-cycle combustion turbine (CCCT) through the full analysis period. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4-5: Please see the confidential Excel file provided on the confidential CD for the detail behind the responses to subparts a-d provided below. The confidential CD will only be provided to those parties that have executed the Protective Agreement in this matter. a. The date upon which the final model runs in the 2013 IRP were conducted was March 2013. b. The capacity factors for Valmy 1 from the 2013 IRP portfolios were: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 1O Year 2013 2014 201s 2016 20t7 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 202s 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2042 SCCI 1 So.rdman to Hemintway plus Demand Re$pnse and 2 Boadman to Hemingway plus Demaad Response Demand CCCr and 4 Demand Respons dus rwo CCCT5 5 oemand Respon* dusTwo Con*otive CCCfs tct--Bsu 7 Coal to Natural Gas Conve6ion plus Boardman to Hemingway and Demand Response I North valmy Oosurc, ,eplaced with Demand Response, Boardman to HeminflaL and a CCCT 9 North valmy clo$re, Boardman to Hemingway Altemative c. The confidential annual nominal variable cost dollars per megawatt-hours (.MWh") for Valmy 1 from the 2013 lRP portfolios using a planning case carbon adder of $14.64 per ton starting in 2018 escalating at 3 percent annually were: d. The annual nominal variable cost dollars per MWH for the CCCT 1 from the 2013 IRP portfolios using a planning case carbon adder of $14.64 per ton starting in 2018 escalating at 3 percent annually were: The response to this Request is sponsored by Tom Harvey, Resource Planning and Operations Director, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 11 Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 20t7 2018 2019 2020 2027 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s 5 s s s 60.34 64.93 68.53 72.42 76.33 80.78 84.51 44.77 93.42 98.15 103.49 80.32 44.67 88.89 93.57 98.32 103.54 37.10 38.89 46.48 49.L4 52.00 55.85 60.68 54.81 68.37 72.25 76.25 80.54 84.39 88.55 93.30 97.94 LO4.42 46.48 49.10 51.98 55.96 60.67 54.4O 64.47 72-45 76.34 80.79 84.46 88.59 93.50 98.18 105.20 46.44 49.10 51.98 55.98 60.77 64.92 58.49 72.49 76.39 80.54 84.50 88.75 93.46 98.08 105.12 50.34 64.88 68.51 72.47 76.45 80.87 84.50 88.80 93.49 98.19 105.28 s s s s s( s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s $ s s s s 5 s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ) s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ttlt I Demand n"rponr"l l5 oemand Response plusaccCTandan l4OemandResponseplus lplusTwoConsecutive sccr ltwo cccrs lcccrt ICL_BSU 7 Coal to Natural Gas Conversion plus Boardman to Hemingway and Demand Response 8 Nonh Valmy Closure, replaced with Demand Response, Boardman to Hemincwav, and a CCCT I lg uorilr vatmv lclosure, Boardman Ito Hemingway lAlternative REQUEST NO. 4-6: Refer to IPC Response to Staff 22, attachment 4 ("Valmy 2 Cooling Tower, Replace"). a. ldentify the date upon which this document was provided to IPC from NV Energy. b. ldentify the individuals (name, department) charged with the review of this document at lPC. c. Provide any written internal correspondence at IPC with respect to the review of this document. d. Provide any written correspondence with NV Energy with respect to the review of this document. e. ldentify the date upon which IPC provided approval to NV Energy to proceed with the Valmy 2 Cooling Tower project as scoped in this document. f. ldentify the date upon which final notice to proceed was provided to the builder by NV Energy. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4-6: a. The information from the Generation Business Case was presented to ldaho Power during the 2010 capital budget meeting in summer 2010. b. The individuals that reviewed this information from Idaho Power are John Carstensen (Joint Projects Department) and the Joint Projects financia! analyst, who was in transition at the time and it is unclear who represented finance during that time. c. There was no other written internal correspondence at ldaho Power with respect to Attachment 4 provided in the Company's response to the ldaho Public Utilities Commission Staffs ("Staff') Request No. 22. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 12 d. There was no other written correspondence with NV Energy with respect to Attachment 4 provided in the Company's response to Staff's Request No. 22. e. This project was part of the capital approval process that was approved by ldaho Power on February 4, 2011, via a budget approva! letter that is provided as an attachment to the Company's response to Sierra Club-lCL's Request No. 4-3. f. NV Energy provided a notice to proceed on the Valmy 2 Cooling Tower Project on December 13, 2013. The response to this Request is sponsored by Tom Harvey, Resource Planning and Operations Director, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 13 REQUEST NO. 4-7: Refer to IPC Response to Staff 22, atlachment 4 ("Yalmy 2 Cooling Tower, Replace"); refer specifically to page 5 of 6 ("Cost Benefits Calculations"). a. Verify that this document was provided to IPC by NV Energy. b. Please provide any workpapers or calculations or spreadsheet versions of this document that were either generated by IPC or provided by NV Energy. c. Confirm or deny: the section entitled "heat rate improvements" assumes a 100o/o capacity factor from Valmy for 2016 through 2021. lf not, please state the capacity factor assumed in the values of "heat rate savings." d. Produce any economic analysis of the Valmy 2 Cooling Tower Replacement project conducted by lPC. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4.7: a. Yes. NV Energy provided ldaho Power with this document. b. There were no other workpapers, calculations, or spreadsheets associated with this document generated by ldaho Power or provided by NV Energy. c. Please see the line labeled "Total Available Hours/yea/'on page 5 of 6 of the Generation Business Case to confirm Attachment 4 uses 8,760 hours/year for the heat rate improvement, or a 100 percent capacity factor. Although the capacity factor was overstated, as stated on page 2 ol 6 of the Generation Business Case, "Even without the heat rate improvement, this project is still viable with a 1.20 lProtitability lndexl Pl. This business case has been calculated very conservatively, and if the probability risk of failure increases, the Pl will only increase." Further justifying the project, on page 3 of 6, under the section "Avoided Derates/Outages," the business IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE- 14 case concludes that the project "Avoids a 1Oo/o chance lor a 50o/o tower failure, with an escalating failure probability ol 5o/o year over year over year, requiring (5) months to repair at a current cost of $15,000,000, plus the equivalent chance of structural failure of the basin resulting in 100% loss of tower capacity." Therefore, in addition to the Valmy 2 Cooling Tower Replacement being economical, the cooling tower was aging, raising safety and reliability concerns. !f the tower was to collapse during the summer season, the unit would be forced offline for approximately five months to construct a new tower. The Valmy 2 Cooling Tower Replacement was based on economics, safety, and reliability. d. ldaho Power did not conduct any other economic analysis with respect to the Valmy 2 Cooling Tower Replacement. The response to this Request is sponsored by Tom Harvey, Resource Planning and Operations Director, ldaho Power Company. DATED at Boise, ldaho, this l Oth day of April 2017 . Attorney for ldaho Power Company IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVAT]ON LEAGUE - 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this l0th day of April 2017 I served a true and correct copy of IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Camille Christen Deputy Attorney General ldaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington (83702) P.O. Box 83720 Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4 Micron Technology, Inc. Thorvald A. Nelson Frederick J. Schmidt Emanuel T. Cocian Brian T. Hansen HOLLAND & HART, LLP 6380 South Fiddlers Green Circle, Suite 500 Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Pete Bennett Micron Technology, Inc. 8000 South FederalWay Boise, ldaho 83707 ldaho lrrigation Pumpers Association, lnc. Eric L. Olsen ECHO HAWK & OLSEN, PLLC 505 Pershing Avenue, Suite 100 P.O. Box 6119 Pocatello, ldaho 83205 Anthony Yankel 12700 Lake Avenue, Unit 2505 Lakewood, Ohio 44107 X Hand Delivered _U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX Email camille.christen@puc.idaho.qov _Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX Email tnelson@hollandhart.com fschmidt@hollandhart. com etcocian@ hol land hart. com bhansen@hollandhart.com klhall@hollandhart.com kmtrease@ hol land ha rt. com _Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX Emai! cbennett@micron.com tawolf@micron.com _Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX Email elo@echohawk.com _Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX Email tony@yankel.net IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 16 ldaho Conservation League Benjamin J. Otto ldaho Conservation League 710 North Sixth Street P.O. Box 844 Boise, ldaho 83701 Sierra Club Travis Ritchie Sierra Club 2101 Webster Street, Suite 1300 Oakland, California 94612 United States Department of Energy and Federal Executive Agencies Steven Porter Office of the General Counsel (GC-76) The United States Department of Energy 1000 lndependence Avenue, SW (Room 6D-033) Washington, D.C.20585 _Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX Email botto@idahoconservation.oro _Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mai! _Overnight Mail _FAXX Email travis.ritchie@sierraclub.orq _Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail_Fru(X Email steven.porter@hq.doe.qov fry,al IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REDACTED RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH SET OF DATA REQUESTS OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE - 17