Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150210ICIP 1-10 to IPC.pdfi::1i.,;:''j: ?ill5 ffiil [0 fiF1 lil: tr] ilrr'i' -;; l-ll iLil'i ::i il''i,',irirJii- :' Peter J. Richardson (lSB No. 3195) Greg Adams (ISB 7454) Richardson Adams, PLLC 515 N. 27ft Street P.O. Box 7218 Boise, Idaho 83702 Telephone: (208) 938-790 I Fax: (208) 938-7904 peter@richardsonadams. com greg@ richardsonadams. com Attorneys for the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY' S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF NEW TARIFF SCFIEDULE 82, A COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAM (FLEX PEAK PROGRAM). CASE NO. IPC-E-I5-03 FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE TNDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY Pursuant to Rule 225 of the Rules of Procedure of the ldaho Public Utilities Commission (the "Commission"), The Industrial Customers of Idaho Power ("lCIP") by and through their attomey of record, Peter J. Richardson, hereby requests that Idaho Power Company ("Company") provide the following documents. This production request is to be considered as continuing, and the Company is requested to provide by way of supplementary responses additionaldocuments that it or any person acting on its behalf may later obtain that will augment the documents produced. Please provide one physicalcopy and one electronic copy, if available, of your answer to Mr. Richardson at the address noted above. Please provide an additional electronic copy, or if unavailable a physical copy, to Dr. Don Reading at 6070 Hill Road, Boise, Idaho 83703, Tel: ICIP First Production Requesst - IPC-E- I 5-03 (208) 3 42-1700; Fax : (208) 3 84- 1 5 1 I ; dreading@mindspring.com For each item, please indicate the name of the person(s) preparing the answers, along with the job title of such person(s) and the witness at hearing who can sponsor the answer. If some of the following requests include disclosures deemed by Idaho Power to be confidential, the ICIP will enter into Idaho Power's standard confidentiality agreement. REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. I What is the target amount of MW for participation in the Flex Peak Program? When is that target expected to be reached? REOUEST FO PRODUCTION NO.2 The proposed Schedule 82's Availability section provides: "The Company shall have the right to accept Participants at its sole discretion based on criteriq the Company considers necessary." It goes on to identifu some of the criteria it may include (total Program capacity, Facility Site location or amount of capacity at a particular location). Please provide a complete list of the criteria that will be used in evaluating a potential Participant's acceptance into the Flex Peak Program. REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.3 Please provide a copy of the Program Application. REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 4 The Company's Application at page 3 provides: "ldaho Power considers demand response a committed resource and 390 MW (including the C&l program) of demand response will be included in each portfolio that is analyzed as part of the 2015 Integrated Resource Planning Process. " Mr. Nesbitt, at page 9 of his direct testimony is asked about the risk of actual load reduction differing from nominated levels. [n response he states: *lnitially the ICIP First Production Request- IPC-E-15-03 Company plans to mitigate the uncertainty by including most, but not all of the total Nominated kW into its forecast of available demqnd response resources. " Please reconcile the two statements and also identify the amount of Nominated kW that will be removed from its load forecasts by year and kW level. REOUEST FOR PROpUCTION NO. s Initially the Flex Peak Program had a target of 50 MW. It was subsequently reduced to between 20 and 35 MW. What will the target for this program be going forward? REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 6 The Company's Application at page 4 provides: "The Company solicited stakeholder preferences and support from its Energt Efficiency Advisory Group ('EEAG) on Friday, January 9, 2015, for either renewing the contract with the third-party administrator or having the Company administer the program. As described more fully in Ms. ll/hite's testimony, the majority of EEAG members appeared to be cautiously supportive of an ldaho Power-managed progrqm; however, one EEAG member expressed a neutral position and another EEAG member recommended the Company retain EnerNOC, lnc. as the third-party manager of the Program." Please provide the minutes and presentation material of the EEAG webinar on January 9,2015. REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 7 Mr. Nesbitt's Direct Testimony at page 5 provides: "ln anticipation of possibly administering the program internally, the Company informally surveyed 25 customers that recently participated in the third-party managed FlexPeak Management program and asked them how they might respond to a change in the way the progrom wos designed and managed. The responses generally indicated those customers would likely participate even if the program changed and they were not provided with the same monitoring and coaching services that ICIP First Production Request - IPC-E-15-03 EnerNOC provided. " Please provide all documents relating to this survey including questions, responses, noteso reports, and internal emails that the Company has pertaining to the survey. REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 8 Mr. Nesbitt's Direct Testimony at page 8 provides: "Additionally, an ldaho Power- managed program may provide an opportunityfor smaller customers to participate -- those who may not have been accepted under a third-party aggregator model. " Please provide the customer size restriction used by EnerNOC and any proposed size limit that will be used by Idaho Power. How many additional kW does the Company assume will be available for the internally- managed program? REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 9 Please provide copies of all material provided to the Commission Staff regarding the Company's application that were provided other than through formal discovery, both prior to, and after, the filing of the Application. REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. TO Please provide discovery responses provided to all other parties in this Docket. DATED this l0th day of February 2015. Richardson Adams,PLLC r. Peter J. Richardson Industrial Customers of Idaho Power ICIP First Production Request - IPC-E-15-03 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 1Oth day of February, 2015, a true and correct copy of the within and foregoing FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER TO IDAHO POWER, in Docket No. IPC-E-15-03 was served as indicated below to: Ms. Jean Jewell X- Hand Delivery Commission Secretary _ U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid Idaho Public Utilities Commission _ Facsimile P O Box 83720 X Electronic Mail Boise lD 83720-0074 Lisa D. Nordstrom X Hand Delivery Idaho Power Company _ U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid 1221 West Idaho Street _ Facsimile Boise,Idaho 83707-0070 X Electronic Mail lnordstrom@ idahopower. com dockets@idahopower.com Tami White Quentin Nesbitt _X Hand Deliver Idaho Power Company _U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid 1221 West Idatro Street _Facsimile Boise,Idaho 83702 X Electronic Mail twhite@ idahopower. com qnessbitt@ idahopower. com Q,, ir\y',$,, Nina Curtis Administrative Assistant ICIP First Production Request - IPC-E-I543