HomeMy WebLinkAbout20141209IPC to Staff 5.pdf3Effi*.
An IDACORP Company
l-1r-,^i-l i -'i\,i11.-ri--. t "
20lt DtC -9 PH 2: 55
r I i I '.
I r,, '.1 '' r- . .-
I tT l Lll'l ::r,j ilfi i,i L,,l ill5i,t, :
DONOVAN E. WALKER
Lead Counsel
dwalker@idahopower.com
December 9,2014
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Jean D. Jewel!, Secretary
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
47 2 W esl Wash i ngton Street
Boise, ldaho 83702
Re: Case No. IPC-E-14-32
Murphy Flat Power, LLC - Idaho Power Company's Response to the Third
Production Request of the Commission Staff
Dear Ms. Jewell:
Enclosed for filing in the above matter are an original and three (3) copies of
ldaho Power Company's Response to the Third Production Request of the Commission
Staff.
An extemal hard drive containing the requested files is provided. The files
provided on the extemal hard drive are confidential and should be handled in
accordance with the Protective Agreement.
DEW:csb
Enclosures
'1221 W. ldaho St. (83702)
P.O. Box 70
Boise, lD 83707
DONOVAN E. WALKER (lSB No. 5921) f?i:ilflilli ''lldaho Power Company
1221West ldaho Street (83702) 2$llr DIC -9 Pi{ 2: 56
P.O. Box 70
Boise, ldaho 8g707 ilTtliTi=f ,,r?;4,ii,ji;iSii,r_
Telephone: (208) 388-5317
Facsimile: (208) 388-6936
dwalker@idahopower.com
Attorney for ldaho Power Company
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
lN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATTON )
oF TDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR ) CASE NO. !PC-E-14-32
APPROVAL OR REJECTION OF AN )
ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT WITH ) IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S
MURPHY FLAT POWER, LLC FOR THE ) RESPONSE TO THE THIRD
SALE AND PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC ) PRODUCTTON REQUEST OF THE
ENERGY.) coMMtssroN srAFF To rDAHo
) POWER COMPANY
)
COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company ("ldaho Powe/'), and in response to the
Third Production Request of the Commission Staff to ldaho Power Company dated
December 3,2014, herewith submits the following information:
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO ]DAHO POWER COMPANY - 1
REQUEST NO. 5: Please re-calculate the rates for the project by using in
AURORA the exact generation quantities and hourly and monthly shapes as are
represented in Appendix I of the Agreement. Please compare the resulting rates to
those contained in Replacement Appendix E included as Attachment 1 to ldaho Powe/s
lnitial Comments. Please compare the 2O-year levelized rates under both scenarlos
and calculate the difference in the total 2O-year contractual obligation. With your
answer, please provide copies of all AURORA and Excel files used for the analysis.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 5: ldaho Power already uses the exact
generation quantities and hourly and monthly shapes as contained within Appendix ! in
the incremental cost lntegrated Resource Plan ("lRP") model in the incremental pricing
tool. One input into the AURORA model that is required to establish the hourly
generation resource stack of existing resources (not including the proposed qualifying
facility ('QF") project) is the estimated hourly generation from all available resources
that exist prior to the addition of the proposed QF project. ln many cases, ldaho Power
does not have specific hourly energy estimates from the various QF projects; instead,
ldaho Power only has monthly energy estimates. Therefore, to create an hourly energy
shape of these QF resources, ldaho Power shapes the monthly energy estimates by
using generic information related to the resource types. ln the case of solar projects,
this hourly shaping has been based upon industry and local information with regards to
solar radiation and the expected energy deliveries from generic solar projects. Because
some solar projects are now providing hourly energy estimates, a potential
enhancement to the incremental cost IRP model will be to include the project specific
hourly energy estimates (when available) in the cumulative solar hourly energy shapes
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION
REOUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 2
that are used in establishing the hourly generation resource stack. ldaho Power has
included the applicable information for the revised incremental cost IRP model runs with
this response. A comparison of the 20-year levelized rates under both scenarios is
listed below.
20-year Levelized Rates
lst Produc'tion 3rd Production
Murphy Flat Power Request
$64.15
Request
$63.80
Difference
($o.ss;
Below is the difference in the total 20-year contractual obligation.
Zo-year Gontractual Obl i gation-l ncl ud i ng lnteg ration
lst Production 3rd Produc'tion DifferenceMurphy Flat Power Request
$67,294,802
Request
$66,848,271 ($446,531)
Please see the directory titled "!PC-E-14-31,32 IPUC Staffs Third Production
Request" and the confidential subdirectory titled "CONFI DENTIAL-IPC-E-1 4-32-Murphy
Flat Power-IPUC 3rd PROD Request-Response 5" on the external hard drive for the
Exce! files used for the analysis. ln addition, please see the directory titled "lPC-E-14-
31,32 IPUC Staffs Third Production Request" and the confidentia! subdirectory titled
.CONFIDENTIAL-|PC-E-14-31, 32-AUROM Change Set-IPUC 3rd PROD Request-
Response 5" for the AUROM files. The files and data contain non-public, confidential,
and proprietary dispatch costs or project generation of ldaho Power resources and
should be handled in accordance with the Protective Agreement. The extemal hard
drive and file subdirectories are marked .CONFIDENTIAL." However, to maintain the
integrity of the files, the files themselves are not further marked or identified as
confidentia!.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 3
The response to this Request is sponsored by Randy C. Allphin, Energy
Contracts Coordinator Leader, ldaho Power Company.
DATED at Boise, ldaho, this gh day of December 2014.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 4
Attorney for ldaho Power Company
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this gh day of December 2014 t served a true and
correct copy of IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD
PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER
COMPANY upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and
addressed to the following:
Commission Staff
Kristine A. Sasser
Deputy Attomey General
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
47 2 W est Washington (83702)
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4
Murphy Flat Power, LLC
Ron Williams
Williams Bradbury, P.C
1015 West Hays Street
Boise, ldaho 83702
Ben Fairbanks
Director, Development
Firct Wind
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Ovemight Mail
FAXX Email kris.sasser@puc.idaho.sov
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
_Ovemight Mail
_FAXX Email ron@williamsbradburv.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Ovemight Mail
_FAXX Email bfairbanks@firstwind.com
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 5
rista Bearry, Legal Assistant