Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20141209IPC to Staff 5.pdf3Effi*. An IDACORP Company l-1r-,^i-l i -'i\,i11.-ri--. t " 20lt DtC -9 PH 2: 55 r I i I '. I r,, '.1 '' r- . .- I tT l Lll'l ::r,j ilfi i,i L,,l ill5i,t, : DONOVAN E. WALKER Lead Counsel dwalker@idahopower.com December 9,2014 VIA HAND DELIVERY Jean D. Jewel!, Secretary ldaho Public Utilities Commission 47 2 W esl Wash i ngton Street Boise, ldaho 83702 Re: Case No. IPC-E-14-32 Murphy Flat Power, LLC - Idaho Power Company's Response to the Third Production Request of the Commission Staff Dear Ms. Jewell: Enclosed for filing in the above matter are an original and three (3) copies of ldaho Power Company's Response to the Third Production Request of the Commission Staff. An extemal hard drive containing the requested files is provided. The files provided on the extemal hard drive are confidential and should be handled in accordance with the Protective Agreement. DEW:csb Enclosures '1221 W. ldaho St. (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, lD 83707 DONOVAN E. WALKER (lSB No. 5921) f?i:ilflilli ''lldaho Power Company 1221West ldaho Street (83702) 2$llr DIC -9 Pi{ 2: 56 P.O. Box 70 Boise, ldaho 8g707 ilTtliTi=f ,,r?;4,ii,ji;iSii,r_ Telephone: (208) 388-5317 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 dwalker@idahopower.com Attorney for ldaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION lN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATTON ) oF TDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR ) CASE NO. !PC-E-14-32 APPROVAL OR REJECTION OF AN ) ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT WITH ) IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S MURPHY FLAT POWER, LLC FOR THE ) RESPONSE TO THE THIRD SALE AND PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC ) PRODUCTTON REQUEST OF THE ENERGY.) coMMtssroN srAFF To rDAHo ) POWER COMPANY ) COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company ("ldaho Powe/'), and in response to the Third Production Request of the Commission Staff to ldaho Power Company dated December 3,2014, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO ]DAHO POWER COMPANY - 1 REQUEST NO. 5: Please re-calculate the rates for the project by using in AURORA the exact generation quantities and hourly and monthly shapes as are represented in Appendix I of the Agreement. Please compare the resulting rates to those contained in Replacement Appendix E included as Attachment 1 to ldaho Powe/s lnitial Comments. Please compare the 2O-year levelized rates under both scenarlos and calculate the difference in the total 2O-year contractual obligation. With your answer, please provide copies of all AURORA and Excel files used for the analysis. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 5: ldaho Power already uses the exact generation quantities and hourly and monthly shapes as contained within Appendix ! in the incremental cost lntegrated Resource Plan ("lRP") model in the incremental pricing tool. One input into the AURORA model that is required to establish the hourly generation resource stack of existing resources (not including the proposed qualifying facility ('QF") project) is the estimated hourly generation from all available resources that exist prior to the addition of the proposed QF project. ln many cases, ldaho Power does not have specific hourly energy estimates from the various QF projects; instead, ldaho Power only has monthly energy estimates. Therefore, to create an hourly energy shape of these QF resources, ldaho Power shapes the monthly energy estimates by using generic information related to the resource types. ln the case of solar projects, this hourly shaping has been based upon industry and local information with regards to solar radiation and the expected energy deliveries from generic solar projects. Because some solar projects are now providing hourly energy estimates, a potential enhancement to the incremental cost IRP model will be to include the project specific hourly energy estimates (when available) in the cumulative solar hourly energy shapes IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REOUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 2 that are used in establishing the hourly generation resource stack. ldaho Power has included the applicable information for the revised incremental cost IRP model runs with this response. A comparison of the 20-year levelized rates under both scenarios is listed below. 20-year Levelized Rates lst Produc'tion 3rd Production Murphy Flat Power Request $64.15 Request $63.80 Difference ($o.ss; Below is the difference in the total 20-year contractual obligation. Zo-year Gontractual Obl i gation-l ncl ud i ng lnteg ration lst Production 3rd Produc'tion DifferenceMurphy Flat Power Request $67,294,802 Request $66,848,271 ($446,531) Please see the directory titled "!PC-E-14-31,32 IPUC Staffs Third Production Request" and the confidential subdirectory titled "CONFI DENTIAL-IPC-E-1 4-32-Murphy Flat Power-IPUC 3rd PROD Request-Response 5" on the external hard drive for the Exce! files used for the analysis. ln addition, please see the directory titled "lPC-E-14- 31,32 IPUC Staffs Third Production Request" and the confidentia! subdirectory titled .CONFIDENTIAL-|PC-E-14-31, 32-AUROM Change Set-IPUC 3rd PROD Request- Response 5" for the AUROM files. The files and data contain non-public, confidential, and proprietary dispatch costs or project generation of ldaho Power resources and should be handled in accordance with the Protective Agreement. The extemal hard drive and file subdirectories are marked .CONFIDENTIAL." However, to maintain the integrity of the files, the files themselves are not further marked or identified as confidentia!. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 3 The response to this Request is sponsored by Randy C. Allphin, Energy Contracts Coordinator Leader, ldaho Power Company. DATED at Boise, ldaho, this gh day of December 2014. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 4 Attorney for ldaho Power Company CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this gh day of December 2014 t served a true and correct copy of IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Kristine A. Sasser Deputy Attomey General ldaho Public Utilities Commission 47 2 W est Washington (83702) P.O. Box 83720 Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4 Murphy Flat Power, LLC Ron Williams Williams Bradbury, P.C 1015 West Hays Street Boise, ldaho 83702 Ben Fairbanks Director, Development Firct Wind Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Ovemight Mail FAXX Email kris.sasser@puc.idaho.sov Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _Ovemight Mail _FAXX Email ron@williamsbradburv.com Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Ovemight Mail _FAXX Email bfairbanks@firstwind.com IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 5 rista Bearry, Legal Assistant