20141202IPC to Staff 3-4.pdf

3Effi*.
An IDACORP Company
DONOVAN E. WALKER
Lead Gouneel
il.ICIi1.;'1 i.,
?CIlt n[[ -2 p]1 t2: hg
tir, r, r'u I -. E/:.
i JT lLl i: "i (:Cl,ii:::'Il - ii
December 2,2014
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
Boise, ldaho 83702
Re: Case No. IPC-E-14-32
Murphy Flat Powea LLC - ldaho Power Company's Response to the
Second Production Request of the Commission Staff
Dear Ms. Jewell:
Enclosed for filing in the above matter are an original and three (3) copies of
ldaho Power Company's Response to the Second Production Request of the
Commission Staff.
DEW:csb
Enclosures
1221 W. ldaho St. (83702)
P.O. Box 70
Boise, lD 83707
Very tryly yours,
6novan E. Walker
DONOVAN E. WALKER (!SB No. 5921)
ldaho Power Company
1221West Idaho Street (83702)
P.O. Box 70
Boise, Idaho 83707
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for ldaho Power Company
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR
APPROVAL OR REJECTION OF AN
ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT WITH
MURPHY FLAT POWER, LLC FOR THE
SALE AND PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC
ENERGY.
nf C[1r,r:irt
:IM[[ -2 Pt4 12: t+9
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-14-32
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S
RESPONSE TO THE SECOND
PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO
POWER COMPANY
COMES NOW, ldaho Power Company ("ldaho Powe/' or "Compaoy"), and in
response to the Second Production Request of the Commission Staff to ldaho Power
Company dated November 20,2014, herewith submits the following information:
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 1
REQUEST NO. 3: ldaho Poweds application states under Paragraph 15 that
"[c]onsistent and materia! deviations from the hourly energy estimates in the generation
profile will be considered by ldaho Power to be a material breach of the agreement--
meaning that the entire pricing is fundamentally flawed as a result of an inaccurate
generation profile". Please discuss how consistent and materia! the deviations need to
be before the entire pricing can be considered fundamentally flawed, and before ldaho
Power would consider this to be a material breach of the agreement.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3: A key input of the ldaho Public Utilities
Commission-approved avoided cost calculation (ldaho Power incremental cost
lntegrated Resource Plan methodology) for this Energy Sales Agreement ("Agreement")
is the hourly energy estimates provided by the project (Appendix ! of the Agreement).
As described in paragraph 15 of the Application, the Agreement contains various price
adjustment mechanisms and materia! deviation clauses to provide a level of assurance
that the hourly energy shape provided by the project and the resulting avoided cost
calculation is an accurate estimate of the project's expected energy production.
Evaluation of materia! deviations will be on a case-by-case basis for each project.
Numerous factors will be considered in determining the impact of material deviations,
some of those factors being time, magnitude, and frequency of the deviations, as well
as whether the pricing adjustments within the Agreement are adequately addressing the
deviations, etc.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Randy C. Allphin, Energy Contract
Coordinator Leader, ldaho Power Company, in consultation with Donovan E. Walker,
Lead Counse!, ldaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 2
REQUEST NO. 4: If the entire pricing is considered fundamentally flawed, what
actions would ldaho Power take?
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4: Idaho Power would determine the most
appropriate action on a case-by-case basis and at the time the material breach
occurred. Please see the Company's response to Staffs Request No. 3 above. The
action taken will be intended to protect ldaho Power customers' interests and ldaho
Power will seek the ldaho Public Utilities Commission's approva! of the action at the
time it is required. Some examples of actions that could be taken are termination of the
Agreement, recalculation of future contract year avoided cost payments, collection of
damages, etc.
The response to this Request is sponsored by Randy C. Allphin, Energy
Contracts Coordinator Leader, ldaho Power Company, in consultation with Donovan E.
Walker, Lead Counsel, ldaho Power Company.
DATED at Boise, ldaho, this 2nd day of December 2014.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 3
AN E. WALKER
Attorney for ldaho Power Company
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 2nd day of December 20141 served a true and
correct copy of IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND
PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER
COMPANY upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and
addressed to the following:
Gommission Staff
Kristine A. Sasser
Deputy Attomey General
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
47 2 W est Washington (83702)
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4
Murphy Flat Power, LLG
Ron Williams
Williams Bradbury, P.C
1015 West Hays Street
Boise, ldaho 83702
Ben Fairbanks
Director, Development
First Wind
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAXX Emai! [e-mail]
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
Email [e-mail]
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mai!
FAX
Email [e-mail]
Christa Bearry, Legal Assistant
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND PRODUCTION
REOUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 4